Wednesday, February 24, 2021

PN suffering from pride, jealousy, egotism, arrogance, greed, lust for power, etc


Perikatan Nasional’s Problem Is Merely Ego And Envy

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Perikatan Nasional’s problem is really not that complex or complicated. It is merely about ego and envy.

The fact that the Abrahamic faiths (meaning Islam, Christianity and Judaism) forbid the sins of pride, envy, jealousy, egotism, arrogance, greed, lust (lust for power and position included), etc., does not seem to matter to those who give an appearance they are ‘good’ Muslims.

Actually, Islam is not merely about praying, fasting, going to Mekah, etc. That is merely scratching the surface. Islam is about what is in your heart. But many Muslims do not have a pure heart. Many of them are what Malays would call ‘hati busuk’, or foul hearted.

Anyway, enough talk on theology. Let’s talk about the problem in Perikatan Nasional. What is wrong with the coalition partners in Perikatan Nasional? After all, there are no ideological differences between Umno, PAS and Bersatu. All have the same ideals and objectives.

Umno, PAS and Bersatu — all three — berjuang for ‘God, King and Country’. In short, they all place Islam, the Malays and the Raja-Raja Melayu as their supreme struggle.

If it was about DAP, then we can understand that there would be ideological differences. DAP wants a secular Malaysian Malaysia based on common law and the abolishment of the Sharia (which is why they hate PAS, who wants the Sharia) — plus DAP opposes the National Language, especially involving education (which is why they want Chinese schools).

In short, DAP want to ‘un-Islamise’ and ‘un-Malay’ Malaysia, the opposite of what Umno, PAS and Bersatu want. DAP wants Malaysia to be a carbon copy of Singapore (which was why Lee Kuan Yew set up DAP in 1965, the unofficial branch of Singapore’s PAP).

Hence there is no logical reason why Umno, PAS and Bersatu should hate one another (but it appears they do) and no reason why any of the Perikatan Nasional members would want to work with DAP (but, apparently, they are considering doing so).

Yes, the problems in Perikatan Nasional defy logic. But then politics is not based on logic. If politics was based on logic, no God-fearing Malay would want to work with DAP when DAP wants to see the destruction of Islam and the Malays.

Currently, DAP does not need to wipe out the Malays. The Malays are wiping out each other. It is like America in the old days. More Native Americans killed each other than the whites did. In fact, the whites were able to take the land of the Native Americans (what used to be called ‘Red Indians’) because they were so divided and were at war with one another.

Battle of the Little Bighorn

On June 25, 1876, Native American forces led by Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull defeat the U.S. Army troops of General George Armstrong Custer in the Battle of the Little Bighorn near southern Montana’s Little Bighorn River.


But then this is the problem with pride, envy, jealousy, egotism, arrogance, greed, lust (lust for power and position included), etc. Even suicide or hara-kiri is acceptable when it involves pride, envy, jealousy, egotism, arrogance, greed, lust for power and position, and so on. And Malays in Perikatan Nasional are suffering from this disease.

Of course, they are raising all sorts of lame excuses to justify their internal rivalry and make it appear like what they are doing is sincere and noble. Even the Spanish Conquistadors said they are massacring millions of South American Indians ‘to save their souls and to send them to heaven’.

Yes, the white Spanish were killing the brown Indians merely with the intention to assist them to journey to heaven (not to steal their gold and land).

Spaniards massacring Incas

Spaniards massacring Aztecs

These Perikatan Nasional Malays might give all sort of ‘noble’ excuses and justification as to why they are fighting each other. But all those excuses and justification are nonsense, utter bullshit. It is all about pride, envy, jealousy, egotism, arrogance, greed, lust for power and position, and whatnot.

I have lived for 20 years in a Malay kampung in Kuala Terengganu. It was a PAS stronghold facing the South China Sea, hence supposedly a very religious community. But the culture of dengki and tamak is very strong amongst these Malays. Most Malays are Islamic externally, but not internally. That is what I discovered living amongst them for 20 years.

You will be surprised that England can at times be more ‘Islamic’ than Malaysia. In fact, if you want to find an Islamic country, then travel to a Christian country. Unfortunately, you will find more ‘nilai-nilai Islam’ in a Christian country than in a Muslim country, which is the sad reality.


  1. As always Raja Petra loves to create fear by saying DAP wants to destroy Islam and the Malays. He casually put it such that it sounds like what he said is a God given truth.

    What a dangerous man this is!

  2. stupid article, the main reason the 3 malay n muslim party fight is bec they know dap n chinese is no more a threat. either one who pen this is stupid or he thot the readers r stupid, highly probable is the latter bec only a malay know how msia zombie react, similarly how ccp know whats in chinese zombie mind.

    1. 犬养mfer is twisting fact using its Formosa trained sophism!

      CCP knows what's in Chinese mind - 以民为政而治.

      Ketuanan f*cks, learned from Formosa dickheads - fear mongerings & elite demoNcratic indoctrination.

      Mfer, r u in that team?

  3. Why do most Muslims prefer to emigrate to or seek asylum in non-Muslim countries? Is it true that Islam flourishes best when Muslims are the minority? Is it true that when Muslims are the majority or hold power the Islam they practice is different?

    Egyptian scholar Mohammad Abduh, traveling to Europe in the late 19th century, summed it up with a neat adage:

    I went to the West and saw Islam, but no Muslims; I got back to the East and saw Muslims, but no Islam.

  4. The original Abrahamic faith Judaism is the best and purest. Then Christianity came along and "modified" it a bit...ha ha ha....and finally more changes came with Islam and we have what we have today.

    1. Deuteronomy 20:10-17 (King James Version)

      10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.

      11 And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.

      12 And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it:

      13 And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword:

      14 But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the Lord thy God hath given thee.

      15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

      16 But of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:

      17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee:

      Best and Purest???

      The Israelites (or their descendants) are still obeying the dictates of their god YHWH today

    2. Jews never conquered any foreign land, only defend what YHWH gave them, a tiny strip of barren land. For thousands of years everywhere in the world except in Israel they are the minority, practicing their faith peacefully.

      And Israel, the size of Perak, only came to be in the 1940s.

      Not so for Christians and Muslims, throughout their histories always fighting and conquering in the name of their God. And using their religion to oppress and mistreat minorities. Fortunately the Christians have, to a large extent, stopped doing that.

    3. Throughout history how many "countries" have Jews conquered or wanted to convert to a state under Jewish law?

      Contrast with the Christian Roman/Byzantine/British/Portuguese/Spanish and Muslim Ottoman Empires always fighting, conquering and converting locals to follow their religion.

      Compare these empires with the "empire" of Israel, the Jewish homeland the size of Perak.

      Till today there are efforts to make countries 100% Islamic, including Malaysia....ha ha ha....even though Islam already control millions of square kilometers of land all over the world, from Morocco in the west to Indonesia in the east but still tak cukup, nak lagi...dan lagi....dan lagi.....but Jews, they just mind their own business and try their best to protect themselves and their God-given country the size of Perak and never try to convert anyone to Judaism by force, by Hotel California or by TIPU.

      Early Jewish traders came to Malaya to trade but never tried to convert anyone neither did they bring any weapons to conquer the local Malays. But the Portuguese, Dutch, British brought in weapons and religion. And when the Muslim traders (eg Arabs) came they brought in Islam.

      Judaism NAMBAR WAN.

    4. since you wish to quote YHWH giving Israelites the land (presuming believe this tale), then it's undeniable that Israelites invaded Canaan, cause this is in the Bible

      my god also gave me Malaya - can I claim it?

    5. Malaya - mana ada tulis dalam Buku Suci? Sila tunjuk.

    6. my god, my holy book - I can write it tonight, wakakaka

  5. "DAP opposes the National Language, especially involving education (which is why they want Chinese schools)"

    As usual this bail jumper's article is filled with lies and slanders as above. Wonder why KT is affording him so much coverage? Guess his Malaysia-Today site is as deserted as the streets in KL during the early MCO so KT has to help out?

  6. To understand the severe obstacles DAP faced in getting anything done in the 18 short months it was in the Ruling Party, you just need to read the hateful write up portion in Rpuki's post.

    "DAP wants a secular Malaysian Malaysia .....abolishment of the Sharia....DAP opposes the National Language....DAP want to ‘un-Islamise’ and ‘un-Malay Malaysia......DAP wants Malaysia to be a carbon copy of Singapore.....the unofficial branch of Singapore’s PAP..."

    ( You want to know why Ktemoc accepted this portion without any critique? )

    Labouring under such evil constraints, DAP has to move cautiously.

    MCA - the Good Guys couldn't get ANYTHING done in 61 years , what do you expect from EVIL DAP in 18 months ?


    Ching Dynasty conquest of Xinjiang, about the same time as the Spaniard Conquistadors were rampaging in Central and South America.

    Mexico , Peru and all the South American countries have been independent for over a hundred years.

    The Uyghurs are still a subjugated people, and will probably remain so "forever".

    1. Wakakakakakaka…

      Keep to yr c&p of western twisted & hp6 history of China.

      The ties of Xinjiang with China goes way way back into the Western Han dynasty in 50BC when the then local Uyghurs (of Persian origin) were fighting the invading Turks with the helps of the Han administrators!

      Thus, the historical blood feuds between the Uyghurs & the Turks!

      History changes when the pommie interfered during the Ching dynasty via Tibetians & indians influences.

      U know about subjugated people?

      Maybe u confuse yr subjugated child as with yr f*cked reading of the western trashes!

    2. y talk west han, qin shihuang already unified china before that y not follow qin map? however
      if western han map is preferred, obviously spratly appear only in eastern han map few hundreds years later when sabahan was having their sunset cruise tour barbecue there, so make up yr mind which dynasty map to use, the best one i suppose is of course genghis n kublai map, tis 2 ccp chinese do their conquer even to eastern europe n middle east.

      more thick face than the umno melayu.


  8. Shihuang Di united China but Qin dynasty lasted for a brief period of 15yrs.

    The ancient western frontiers of the China have always been a roaming ground of the nomadic tribes of the steppes. Many of these nomadic tribes were finally been absorbed into China proper under 西汉 when 河西走廊 was established.

    So what do a nonchinese know about the China history? More so using that Formosa trained sophism to twist the facts!

    "spratly appear only in eastern han map few hundreds years later when sabahan was having their sunset cruise tour barbecue there"

    犬养mfer, do show yr proofs that the ancient Sabahan visited spratly prior to 25-220 CE.

    If u want to fart about the dynasty map of genghis n kubla, then make very sure u look up yr favourite katak island. Formosa was an official 宋朝 district of “毗舍那”. Even in 秦朝,it was known as “满洲”!

    BTW, 元朝 was never a maritime superpower. Many of her attempts to conquer Japan failed due to the weather & sea conditions. It had also mistaken Formosa as “琉球” - a ancient name used for The Ryukyu Islands (present day Okinawa).

    So have yr petrified face been smacked kauX2? Or that thickness has no bound?