Wednesday, November 11, 2026

'They will kill you too': Sonia Gandhi's turbulent journey in Indian politics





'They will kill you too': Sonia Gandhi's turbulent journey in Indian politics


5 hours ago
Soutik Biswas
India correspondent


Reuters
Sonia Gandhi has been one of the most powerful political figures in India's history


On the morning of 31 October 1984, Sonia Gandhi was a young wife and mother, living in the prime minister's residence in Delhi. She was about to take a bath when she heard shots ring out in the garden.

Her mother-in-law, Indira Gandhi, India's prime minister, had just left for her office in an adjoining building. Moments later, she would be assassinated by two of her Sikh bodyguards, in retaliation for the Indian army's storming of the Golden Temple in Amritsar, Sikhism's holiest shrine, earlier that year.

The sound was like firecrackers, but "different". The children's nanny came pounding on the bathroom door, hysterical, pointing towards the garden.

Sonia ran towards the path. A white Ambassador car was moving slowly towards her. Inside, Indira lay covered in blood, her sari stained, her eyes open, her face wearing what Sonia remembered as a look of surprise.

"Mummy, Mummy," she tried to say. No words came. At the hospital, she waited for hours before a doctor's shake of the head told her what she feared.

The ordeal did not end there. Rajiv Gandhi, her husband and the elder son of Indira Gandhi, summoned from a rally in West Bengal, arrived to tell her that party leaders wanted him to become prime minister.

Sonia's response was fury and terror. "They will kill you; they will kill you, too!" she pleaded. Rajiv replied: "They will kill me anyway." That evening, as Indira's body lay at home, Rajiv was sworn in.

It is one of the most searing passages in Belonging: A Journey of Love, Sonia Gandhi's new memoir: private devastation unfolding alongside the pressures of public life.

The woman who had largely stayed away from politics was now married to India's prime minister, and would eventually find herself at the head of the Congress party, leading it through two general election victories and becoming one of the country's most consequential political figures.

The passage also foreshadows another devastating loss. In 1991, Rajiv himself was assassinated.


Getty Images - Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards in October 1984


For Sonia, the years that followed were marked by retreat.

At 19, a young woman from a small Italian town, she had met Rajiv, an Indian student, in England. Their relationship took her into a new country and family, and a close bond with Indira followed. India became home through her husband and her mother-in-law.

After Rajiv's killing, even the public appearances required by the memorial trusts she headed became an ordeal. Before speeches, she feared tears would overwhelm her.

When the Dalai Lama asked whether she felt vengeful towards her husband's killers, she answered, "No, I don't," and burst into sobs. Slowly, she writes, Rajiv became "a presence within me rather than a piercing absence".

But grief returned at family milestones. At her son Rahul's Cambridge graduation in 1995, she and her children were overcome by the thought of how proud Rajiv would have been.

Politics, meanwhile, was closing in. The Congress party, the political vehicle of her husband's family for generations, was losing cohesion and electoral ground. Senior leaders were defecting, and the calls for Sonia to step in were growing louder.

She initially refused. She writes she had seen politics through Rajiv: its achievements, but also its "ambition and greed, hypocrisy and treachery". "I'd always disliked politics," she writes. It had taken first her mother-in-law, then "the love of my life, my children's father".

Yet the party's decline began to feel personal. Walking past photographs of Indira and Rajiv, she was seized by "a mixture of pain and guilt". She feared that the forces they had fought to "protect India's pluralistic ethos" were gaining ground: a rising Hindu nationalism that, in her view, threatened the "secular and pluralistic vision" of India they had sought to defend.

Congress leaders argued that without her, the party could splinter, leaving little to resist communal politics. The family name, she believed, carried an appeal beyond religion, caste, language and region. This, she says, was "the most compelling argument".


Getty Images - Rajiv Gandhi took oath as India's youngest prime minister hours after his mother's death


Her doubts were also about her own credentials. How could an outsider occupy a position held by two formidable figures? At home, Rahul and Priyanka feared losing their mother as they had lost their grandmother and father. Before a New Year holiday, they extracted a promise: "Don't you do anything crazy while we're away."

The "answer", she says, came through the Bhagavad Gita. Though not religious in adult life, Sonia arranged private lessons with a Sanskrit scholar in January 1997. They read the text verse by verse. She writes that its central message – to perform one's dharma, or duty, without attachment to the fruits of one's actions – eventually resolved her inner conflict.

"I had the answer to my own doubts and questions. I had to step out and go where my duty called. And I did."

The memoir's most dramatic political scene, however, comes seven years later, after Congress's 2004 election victory. Sonia had led the party's campaign.

Sonia goes with Manmohan Singh to meet India's president at the presidential palace in Delhi and formally stake the Congress-led alliance's claim to form a government. Everyone assumes she will become prime minister. She says nothing.

At home, she tells a senior aide she intends to refuse. Party workers gather at the gates; senior colleagues demand a meeting.

"You fought the election, you led us," says one. "People believed in you. How can you let them down like this? Our workers will revolt. You think they'll accept another leader?"

Alliance leaders arrive to persuade her. They surround her, she recalls, and one insists: "We will not take no for an answer." Overwhelmed, she murmurs "Theek hai" - all right. They take it as consent and begin congratulating her.

Her children are appalled, she writes. Rahul storms in: "You said yes?" Her daughter Priyanka urges her not to be forced into a decision.

Sonia writes she spends a long night arguing with herself, friends and family. The risk is not merely personal. She believes the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would continue to exploit her foreign birth and that accepting office would allow the controversy to "create havoc" and hurt the country. By morning she is clear. "I've made up my mind. I'm going to stick to my stand," she tells Rahul.


AFP via Getty Images - Sonia Gandhi (centre), with daughter Priyanka and son Rahul, at the funeral of Rajiv Gandhi in 1991


She chooses Singh, a trained economist and a party member, instead, describing him as a man "above reproach", with a "deep and consummate understanding of governance".

The book is at its most revealing when it turns from family memory to the India she believes has been lost.

Sonia says that when she entered public life there was "a certain decency and decorum in parliamentary politics".

Political attacks and harsh words were not new, but she sees a sharper appetite among those in power "to belittle and torment those who differ from them, to intimidate those they perceive as opponents". It is, she says, part of a wider international drift towards "a heartlessness that accompanies authoritarian regimes".

Her portrait of prime minister Narendra Modi of the Hindu nationalist BJP is unusually direct.

The two have had "practically no real contact", she writes, beyond formal greetings at parliamentary gatherings and occasional exchanges - "Theek hain, aap?" ("Are you all right?") - when she returned from hospital. "He tends to look away," she says, "avoiding eye contact."


Getty Images - Sonia Gandhi with Manmohan Singh, whom she chose as prime minister after declining the post herself when Congress returned to power in 2004


Modi's idea of India, she writes, was shaped by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and "affirmed a fundamentalism in which his faith and culture superseded all others". His is an India of "hierarchy, order, and control"; hers is "an India against hegemony", standing for "inclusiveness, secularism, and social justice".

There is a striking concession amid the polemic - she says she understood Modi's "discomfort with the ruling elite of our times".

Sonia says she felt uneasy in Delhi's privileged drawing rooms, where political conversation seemed "very far removed from the reality of India".

Modi's origins, she writes, "may not be as humble as his PR team" suggests, but he "had certainly worked his way to power within the RSS from an underprivileged world". It is a rare acknowledgement of the social distance between the Congress establishment and the electorate Modi came to represent.

The memoir also offers some glimpses of Sonia's encounters with world leaders.

She remembers Vladimir Putin as an "engaging personality" who took her on a boat ride in St Petersburg, pointing out monuments along the way. She says she was impressed by his grasp of geopolitics and his "determination to restore Russia to its former powerful status" - "long before the Ukraine war, a different era".


Reuters - Sonia Gandhi writes that she and PM Modi (foreground) have had "practically no real contact"


A more amusing encounter involved France's Nicolas Sarkozy, who arrived in India in 2008 without his then partner Carla Bruni because they were unmarried.

At a state banquet, the Indian vice-president's wife cheerfully grilled him about when he planned to marry her, whether he missed her and whether a date had been fixed. Sarkozy obligingly answered her questions while messaging Bruni on his phone.

Belonging is not a neutral history. The Bofors gun scandal, which badly damaged Rajiv Gandhi's government and dogged the family for decades, gets a relatively brief treatment.

The 502-page memoir is less forthcoming about the less flattering aspects of Congress's own record. Sonia has much to say about political corruption, hypocrisy and the decline of public standards under her opponents, but largely sidesteps the culture of patronage, cronyism and corruption that dogged Congress during its years in power. There is little reckoning, either, with the party's own share of responsibility for the erosion of public trust.

She is at pains to defend the political inheritance of her husband and mother-in-law, even as the party they built has suffered a prolonged decline. The story she tells is as much about the costs of carrying that inheritance as it is about a woman who says she never wanted the life she ended up leading.

That gives the memoir's final pages an unmistakable melancholy. Sonia, 79, is now a member of the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of parliament. Rahul, 55, is a four-term MP and leader of the opposition; Priyanka, 53, is also a member of parliament.

Sonia says the challenge was to remain faithful to "a just and humane society", through pain and loss, victory and defeat, and the manoeuvring that politics demands. But she ends not with triumph, nor even with the assurance that history will vindicate her.

"At this moment it seems to me that, although I tried my best, I didn't succeed in beating back the forces I'd set out to fight."

Unburdened Loke swings at MCA, urges voters to deny BN return to the old days








Unburdened Loke swings at MCA, urges voters to deny BN return to the old days

Published: Nov 11, 2026 9:00 AM


MALACCA POLLS | No longer saddled with the responsibility of maintaining cabinet harmony, DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke has taken aim at BN chairperson Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and MCA president Wee Ka Siong, challenging voters to reject a return to the coalition's rule.

Loke (above), whose resignation as transport minister took effect yesterday following the transfer of former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak to house arrest, was responding to Zahid's reminder that he had vowed to step down once Najib returned home.

"I want to tell Zahid, this is the secretary-general of DAP, not the president of MCA. This is Anthony Loke, not Wee Ka Siong.

"I have stated that I will resign - I will resign," he roared at a ceramah in Batu Berendam, Malacca last night.


He added that DAP respected the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's constitutional power to grant pardons, but maintained that the party had its own position on Najib's house arrest.

Loke's resignation was first offered following a DAP central executive committee (CEC) meeting on Sept 19, which decided that he would leave the cabinet to reflect the party's opposition to Najib serving the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest.

Najib Abdul Razak

He subsequently submitted his resignation letter to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on Sept 28, but agreed to remain in office temporarily at the latter's request.

The following day, Loke said he had set a clear timeframe for his departure, insisting that his resignation would take effect on the day Najib returned home.


Najib arrived at his Kuala Lumpur residence last night following a Kuala Lumpur High Court order paving the way for his transfer from Kajang Prison.

Under the order, Najib, 73, will serve the remainder of his reduced six-year sentence in the SRC International case under house arrest until Aug 23, 2028. He must then return to Kajang Prison on Aug 24, 2028, to serve his separate sentence in the 1MDB case.


Making threats, but not following through

Striking a noticeably more fiery tone than usual, Loke took a pointed jab at MCA by suggesting that the party's leaders were accustomed to making threats without following through on them.

He cited Wee's repeated warnings that MCA would take firm action after BN's decision to negotiate seat allocations for the Malacca state election without his knowledge, and the announcement of candidates without consulting him.

Wee Ka Siong

However, Loke pointed out that MCA eventually accepted BN's arrangement, which saw it contest two seats it had previously held along with two additional seats.

"This is the nature of the MCA. They have no principles and lack the courage to take action," Loke claimed.

In contrast, he said DAP and Harapan were prepared to stand by their words and principles, even when doing so came at a political cost.
Loke further urged Malacca voters to remember the public anger over corruption and the 1MDB scandal that drove BN's defeat in the 2018 general election.

"We have never forgotten the struggle for the people. We know that when we formed the government in 2018, we brought down BN and a corrupt government because of the 1MDB scandal, as the people rose to reject kleptocracy and corruption," he said.

"That was why we succeeded in forming the government in Putrajaya and also Malacca in 2018. We have never forgotten that the people hoped to see a clean government."

Johor state election 2026 PH generic flag


He called on voters to support Harapan's candidates in Saturday's polls, framing the election as an opportunity to defend the principles that had catalysed BN's fall.
Despite heavy rain, approximately 300 people attended the ceramah, which featured speeches by Deputy Higher Education Minister Adam Adli Abdul Halim, Deputy Education Minister Wong Kah Woh, and Entrepreneur Development and Cooperatives Minister Steven Sim, among others.

Also sighted were DAP's Seputeh MP Teresa Kok and Deputy Finance Minister Liew Chin Tong.

Guan Eng praises Loke's resignation, says it's proof DAP stands by its principles








Guan Eng praises Loke's resignation, says it's proof DAP stands by its principles


Published: Nov 11, 2026 11:00 AM


DAP adviser Lim Guan Eng has praised party secretary-general Anthony Loke's decision to resign as transport minister as a sign of protest against former premier Najib Abdul Razak being allowed to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest.

Lim (above) said in a statement that Loke's resignation proves DAP has been consistent in its stance on Najib and his role in the RM52 billion 1MDB scandal.

"Loke's resignation proves the consistency of DAP's stance, whether in the opposition or in government, in remaining steadfast and vocal in opposing Najib's primary role in the scandal," he said.

Lim stated that Loke also demonstrated his commitment to principles by giving up his position and relinquishing all the facilities and privileges of being a minister.


"DAP is always different because it firmly adheres to the principles of championing the truth and rejecting wrongdoing.

"Loke has clearly proven that this is the real DAP when he is willing to sacrifice his position for the sake of principles, and give up all the conveniences and privileges of office to defend dignity," he said.

Anthony Loke

Lim stressed that the DAP leadership and members were firmly behind Loke.


Loke steps down

Loke announced his intent to resign as transport minister on Sept 19 after a DAP central executive committee meeting decided on the party's response to the conditional pardon granted to Najib.

The pardon granted on Sept 18 allows the former prime minister to serve the remainder of his six-year prison sentence in the SRC International case via house arrest until Aug 23, 2028, subject to stipulated conditions including the payment of a RM50 million fine.

On Sept 29, Loke confirmed that he had submitted his resignation letter to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim the day before, but after being persuaded to continue his duties temporarily, the former set his resignation to take effect as soon as Najib returns home.


Loke reiterated this stance on Nov 6. Four days later, the Kuala Lumpur High Court allowed Najib to serve the remainder of his SRC International sentence at his residence in Langgak Duta, Kuala Lumpur.

Following the court's decision, Loke announced his resignation as transport minister with immediate effect.

Mat Sabu calls for law to make house arrest available to all convicts

 


Mat Sabu calls for law to make house arrest available to all convicts

Mat Sabu calls for law to make house arrest available to all convicts

Agriculture and food security minister says he is prepared to donate his ministerial salary to fund NGOs campaigning for such legislation.

Mat Mohamad Sabu MAHA 2026
Agriculture and food security minister Mohamad Sabu said his stance was not motivated by any personal grievance with former prime minister Najib Razak. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA:
Legislation must be drawn up to allow convicts to serve half of their prison sentences under house arrest, agriculture and food security minister Mohamad Sabu said today, adding that justice cannot be the “exclusive right of certain groups”.

He said he was prepared to donate his entire ministerial salary for the rest of the current parliamentary term to fund NGOs campaigning for such legislation.

Mohamad, the Kota Raja MP and Amanah president, said his stance was not motivated by any personal grievance with former prime minister Najib Razak.

“The principle of equality before the law must not be compromised on the basis of position, political influence or family ties. The law must be fair to all. Malaysia cannot practise a two-tiered justice system,” he said in a statement.

The High Court issued an order yesterday allowing Najib to serve the remainder of his prison sentence in the SRC International case under house arrest until Aug 23, 2028.

Najib was jailed in August 2022 after the Federal Court upheld his conviction for abuse of power, criminal breach of trust and money laundering involving RM42 million in SRC International funds.

He was sentenced to 12 years’ jail and fined RM210 million. In January 2024, then Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah halved the prison sentence and reduced the fine to RM50 million as part of a royal pardon.

In September this year, the current Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Sultan Ibrahim, granted Najib a further conditional pardon, allowing him to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest, subject to payment of a RM50 million fine and compliance with other stipulated conditions.

Zahid wary of losing ministerial post in Cabinet reshuffle, says Puad

 


Zahid wary of losing ministerial post in Cabinet reshuffle, says Puad

Zahid wary of losing ministerial post in Cabinet reshuffle, says Puad

Ex-Umno leader Puad Zarkashi says the portfolios of other BN ministers could also be changed in the event of a reshuffle.

Puad Zarkashi
Former Umno supreme council member Puad Zarkashi said a Cabinet reshuffle would be more appropriate as the 16th general election is still some way off.
PETALING JAYA:
Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi may have proposed dissolving Parliament instead of a Cabinet reshuffle out of fear of losing his rural and regional development ministry portfolio, according to former party leader Puad Zarkashi.

The former Umno supreme council member said a Cabinet reshuffle would be more appropriate than Zahid’s suggestion of dissolving Parliament, as the 16th general election (GE16) was still some way off.

“Zahid is afraid that a Cabinet reshuffle could see him lose his portfolio at the rural and regional development ministry. Not only that, the portfolios of other BN ministers could also change,” Puad said in a Facebook post.

Zahid, who is also a deputy prime minister, said yesterday that dissolving Parliament would be better than a Cabinet reshuffle, as it would allow the people to give a fresh mandate before a new Cabinet is formed.

Loke Siew Fook stepped down as transport minister yesterday while finance minister II Amir Hamzah Azizan’s appointment as a senator expires in December.

Puad also said BN appeared to be burning its bridges with Pakatan Harapan (PH) by drawing up a joint manifesto with PAS for the Melaka state election.

He said PH would be seen as having no dignity if it failed to take action against BN to uphold the principle of collective responsibility within the unity government.

“The unity government’s name and image will be tarnished if no action is taken,” he said.

Puad cited former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s actions in 1987, when several ministers and deputy ministers who supported the Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah-led “Team B” were dropped from the Cabinet.

“Let us wait and see whether BN ministers will dare to resign if their portfolios are changed,” he said.