Wednesday, March 04, 2026

How many countries has the US bombed since 2001, and how much has it cost?




How many countries has the US bombed since 2001, and how much has it cost?

Since 9/11, the US has engaged in three full-scale wars, bombing at least 10 countries under four presidents


(Al Jazeera)
By Marium Ali
Published On 3 Mar 2026


Despite promising to end United States involvement in costly and destructive foreign wars, President Donald Trump, together with Israel, has launched a massive military assault on Iran, targeting its leadership and nuclear and missile infrastructure.

Much like his predecessors, Trump has relied on military force to pursue US strategic interests, continuing a pattern that has defined US foreign policy for more than two decades.

Since the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and the US capital, the US has engaged in three full-scale wars and bombed at least 10 countries in operations ranging from drone strikes to invasions, often multiple times within a single year.

The graphic below shows all the countries the US has bombed since 2001.

These may not include all military strikes, particularly covert or special operations.

The US has bombed at least 10 countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, Libya, Syria, Venezuela, Nigeria and Iran since 2001. [Al Jazeera]


The cost of decades of war

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, President George W Bush launched what he called a “war on terror”, a global military campaign that reshaped US foreign policy and triggered wars, invasions and air strikes across numerous countries.

According to an analysis by Brown University’s Watson Institute of International & Public Affairs, US-led wars since 2001 have directly caused the deaths of about 940,000 people across Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen and other conflict zones.

This does not include indirect deaths, namely those caused by loss of access to food, healthcare or war-related diseases.


(Al Jazeera)


The US has spent an estimated $5.8 trillion funding its more than two decades of conflict.

This includes $2.1 trillion spent by the Department of Defense (DOD), $1.1 trillion by Homeland Security, $884bn to increase the DOD base budget, $465bn on veterans’ medical care and an additional $1 trillion in interest payments on loans taken out to fund the wars.

In addition to the $5.8 trillion already spent, the US is expected to have to lay out at least another $2.2 trillion for veterans’ care over the next 30 years.

This would bring the total estimated cost of US wars since 2001 to $8 trillion.


Afghanistan war (2001-2021)

The first and most direct response to 9/11 was the invasion of Afghanistan to dismantle al-Qaeda and remove the Taliban from power.

On October 7, 2001, the US launched Operation Enduring Freedom.

The initial invasion succeeded in toppling the Taliban regime within just a few weeks. However, armed resistance groups mounted a prolonged resistance against US and coalition forces.

The war went on to become the longest conflict in US history, spanning four presidencies and lasting 20 years until the final withdrawal in 2021, after which the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan.

An estimated 241,000 people died as a direct result of the war, according to an analysis from Brown University’s Costs of War project. Hundreds of thousands more people, mostly civilians, died due to hunger, disease and injuries caused by the war.



At least 3,586 soldiers from the US and its NATO allies were killed in the war, which is estimated to have cost $2.26 trillion for the US, according to the Cost of War project.


Iraq war (2003-2011)

On March 20, 2003, Bush launched a second war, this time in Iraq, claiming that President Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction – a claim that proved to be false.

On May 1, 2003, Bush declared “mission accomplished” and the end of major combat operations in Iraq.

Bush on board the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier, where he declared combat operations in Iraq over on May 1, 2003 [Larry Downing/Reuters]


However, the subsequent years were defined by violence from armed groups and a power vacuum that fuelled the rise of ISIL (ISIS).

In 2008, Bush agreed to withdraw US combat troops, a process completed in 2011 under President Barack Obama.


The drone wars: Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen

Although not declared wars, the US has also expanded its air and drone campaigns.

Beginning in the mid-2000s, the CIA launched drone strikes inside Pakistan’s tribal areas along the Afghan border, targeting al-Qaeda and Taliban figures believed to be operating there. These strikes marked the early expansion of remote warfare.

Obama dramatically expanded the drone strikes in Pakistan, particularly in the early years of his presidency.

At the same time, the US conducted air strikes in Somalia against suspected al-Qaeda affiliates, later targeting fighters linked to al-Shabab as that armed group grew in strength.

In Yemen, US forces carried out missile and drone strikes against al-Qaeda leaders.


Libya intervention

In 2011 during an uprising against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, the US joined a NATO-led intervention in Libya. American forces launched air and missile strikes to enforce a no-fly zone.

Gaddafi was overthrown and killed, and Libya descended into prolonged instability and factional fighting.


Iraq and Syria

From 2014 onwards, the US intervened in the Syrian war with the stated goal of defeating ISIL. Building on its campaign in Iraq, the US conducted sustained air strikes in Syria while supporting local partner forces on the ground.

In Iraq, US forces advised Iraqi troops, fought ISIL remnants and tried to counter Iranian influence, highlighted by a Trump-ordered 2020 strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani.


Why Britain’s Air Defence Destroyer HMS Duncan Can’t Protect Key Bases From Iranian Strikes


Military Watch: 


Why Britain’s Air Defence Destroyer HMS Duncan Can’t Protect Key Bases From Iranian Strikes

Middle East , Naval


The British Ministry of Defence was reported on March 3 to have decided to dispatch the Type 45 class destroyer HMS Duncan to Cyprus to help defend British military facilities there, after several reports indicated that multiple Iranian drones had targeted RAF Akrotiri, a major Royal Air Force base. This has occurred amid a broader buildup by multiple NATO member states in the theatre of operations, including France, Germany and Greece, as the growing depletion of the air defences of the United States, Israel and their strategic partners in the Gulf region has raised serious questions regarding how long they can sustain their assault against Iran. The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps fields one of the largest arsenals of ballistic missiles and single use attack drones in the world, and has widely targeted the U.S. and its strategic partners’ military facilities, after the United States and Israel launched attacks on targets across Iran on February 28. 

British Royal Navy Type 45 Class Destroyer HMS Duncan
British Royal Navy Type 45 Class Destroyer HMS Duncan

The Type 45 is a heavily specialised air defence destroyer, and lacks a cruise missile strike capability or any significant offensive capabilities against surface ships or ground targets. Despite this specialisation, its air defence capabilities remain highly limited, particularly compared to those of U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke class destroyers deployed in the Middle East. Against drone attacks, Type 45 class ships are highly prone to being overwhelmed, as they carry some of the smallest missile arsenals in the world, with just 48 vertical launch cells. To place the limitations of the ships’ arsenals in perspective, Arleigh Burke class destroyers integrate 96 vertical launch cells, while Chinese Type 055 class destroyers integrate 112 cells. With Iranian forces having deployed swarms of hundreds of attack drones in the past, the Type 45 is far from an optimal asset to engage them. 

Iranian Khorramshahr Ballistic Missile Launch
Iranian Khorramshahr Ballistic Missile Launch

In spite of its focus on air defence operations, Type 45 class destroyers have no ballistic missile defence capabilities, again contrasting to Arleigh Burke Class ships which integrate a multi-layered networks built around the SM-2, SM-3 and SM-6 anti-ballistic missiles. At a Defence Select Committee in early 2021 it was highlighted that this had left the British Armed Forces without any maritime ballistic missile defence capability. Dr Sidharth Kaushal, a research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, stressed “the absence of a capability to counter anti-ship ballistic missiles on the Type 45 destroyer.” “That was discussed in the 2015 strategic defence and security review, as part of a wider ballistic missile defence capability for the vessel, but it was absent in this review, which I thought was noteworthy,” he added. 

Type 45 Class Destroyer Launches Aster Missile - These Lack a Ballistic Missile Defence Capability
Type 45 Class Destroyer Launches Aster Missile - These Lack a Ballistic Missile Defence Capability

Regarding the Type 45’s inability to defend against ballistic missile attacks, Rear Admiral Alex Burton in 2021 similarly observed: “one of the gaping holes within the defence review is an anti-ballistic missile defence mechanism, both at sea and ashore.” “There is a gaping hole in our ability to defend a carrier against a ballistic missile without the support of our allies… The Navy has been clear that there has been a national capability gap, for the last 10 years, at least, in an anti-ballistic missile defence capability,” he added. Although Type 45 class destroyers are scheduled to be modernised with subsystems and new missiles that will allow them to defend against ballistic missile attacks under the Sea Viper Evolution Programme, this will only meet required standards in the late 2030s or early 2040s. Thus while the deployment of a Type 45 class destroyer will represent a show of force, its practical utility remains limited. Moreover, Iran’s advanced anti-ship ballistic missile capabilities may lead it to escalate by seeking to fire on the vessel, which represents a high value target for such strikes. 


***


Used to be one of the best navies, now RN has gone to the dogs🙄🫩🥴



Tuesday, March 03, 2026

Prof Solehah Yaacob: 'Srivijaya was an Islamic empire'



From the FB page of:


SEA Heritage & History








| How could the Malaysian Ministry of Education permit someone to make unfounded statements while presenting themselves as a " Professor " ?


" if she had expressed such views without invoking her academic credentials, I would not have considered it a concern.”


The claim that Srivijaya was an Islamic empire is not supported by credible historical evidence.


Primary inscriptions from the 7th century, including the Kedukan Bukit (683 CE) and Talang Tuwo (684 CE) inscriptions, clearly show Buddhist terminology and Sanskrit religious expressions. These inscriptions reflect Mahayana Buddhist concepts, not Islamic doctrine.


Chinese monk Yijing, who stayed in Srivijaya in 671 CE, described it as a major center of Buddhist learning with more than 1,000 monks studying Buddhist scriptures before traveling to India. His records provide direct contemporary testimony.


Archaeological findings in Palembang, Jambi and surrounding areas include Buddhist statues, stupas, and Vajrayana artifacts, not mosques, Islamic royal titles, or Islamic inscriptions from the Srivijaya period.


Historically, Islam began spreading significantly in the Indonesian archipelago around the 12th-13th centuries. By that time, Srivijaya had already declined after the 1025 attack by the South Indian Chola kingdom. The earliest clearly documented Islamic kingdom in the region was Samudera Pasai in the 13th century, not Srivijaya.


Mainstream historians such as George Cœdès, O.W. Wolters, Anthony Reid, and M.C. Ricklefs consistently identify Srivijaya as a Buddhist maritime empire.


Historical discussion should be grounded in inscriptions, archaeology, and credible scholarship, not retrospective reinterpretation without evidence.



😂😂😂


____________


Source:


1. George Cœdès, The Indianized States of Southeast Asia (1968).
2. O.W. Wolters, Early Indonesian Commerce (1967).
3. Yijing, A Record of the Buddhist Religion as Practiced in India and the Malay Archipelago (7th century).
4. Anthony Reid, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce (1988).
5. M.C. Ricklefs, A History of Modern Indonesia Since c. 1200 (2001).

'Srivijaya was an Islamic empire'?

😂😂😂





Jim Rickards: "Cuba's Next" After Iran Strikes








Tuesday, Mar 03, 2026 - 8:40




While the mainstream dithers over the "fog of war" in the Middle East, Jim Rickards is connecting the dots on the global chessboard. Following the successful decapitation strike on Iran’s entire leadership—a hit accelerated after intel found the Ayatollah and his cronies all in one room—Rickards reveals the U.S. has already locked down Venezuelan oil. Now, he warns the administration is eyeing its next target: Cuba.

This isn't chaos; it's a strategy to control global energy spigots and squeeze China. With Brent spiking and gold shattering $5,300, the signal is clear. The dollar is bleeding out in gold terms, and $10,000 is no longer a forecast—it's a timeline. The COMEX lost control long ago.

Follow Daniela on X: Daniela Cambone


Oil Spikes To Session High As Iraq Starts Shutting Output At Massive Oil Field








by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Mar 04, 2026 - 01:20 AM


Update(0920ET): In a massive though not completely unexpected development, Iraq has shut down 460,000 barrels per day of production at the West Qurna 2 field, Iraqi oil officials told Reuters. Officials warned the country will be forced to cut more than 3 million barrels per day within days if oil tankers cannot move freely and access loading terminals, as confirmed in Bloomberg.

On Tuesday, Iraq reduced output at the Rumaila oil field by 700,000 barrels per day. Rumaila is the second-largest oil field in the world, and storage levels at southern export terminals have reached critical capacity due to disruptions and slowdowns in tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, according to local officials.

Importantly, Iraq also halted crude exports from its semi-autonomous Kurdistan region through the key pipeline to Turkey’s port of Ceyhan, according to sources cited by Bloomberg. Roughly 200,000 barrels per day have been shut in as producers cut output amid escalating regional conflict. Only about 50,000 barrels per day are now being produced for domestic use.

Energy infrastructure in northern Kurdistan has faced repeated attacks during prior unrest. And now with major fields throttling output and exports constrained, oil prices are surging.



Targeting Gulf production from across water in Iran....


Thick black smoke pours Tuesday from the Port of Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates, located on the Gulf of Oman as one of the UAE’s only oil terminals south of the Strait of Hormuz, following a drone attack this morning on oil storage tanks and other infrastructure at the port Show more
676
Reply
Copy link


Iran appears to have turned its sights on Fujairah in the UAE. The port is the the Middle East's largest bunkering terminal for tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz and major loading point for Murban crude. Map from @EnergySPG shows scale of the facility.
281
Reply
Copy link

* * *

Israeli and US forces pressed forward with their assault on Iran, striking targets across the country, including Iran's state broadcaster and central military command centers, as the official death toll has climbed to 787 Iranians killed since the start of the Trump-ordered Operation Epic Fury. The US has sustained at least six troop deaths and several more seriously wounded.

Fears that this could open to a broader multi-front war appear to be coming to reality, as at the same time Israel escalated operations on a second front, intensifying airstrikes on Lebanon and launching a new ground incursion into the south. Beirut is once again under Israeli bombs, after Israel accused Hezbollah of firing rockets on the north. What's more is that Kann News is citing a senior Israeli official as follows: We assess that Saudi Arabia will attack Iran soon after it was attacked yesterday. The war is expanding.



Beirut on fire, via AP


The conflict has continued to spread across the Gulf. Saudi authorities said two drones struck the US Embassy in Riyadh, igniting a small fire and causing minor damage. However, there's been surprisingly little information or video to come out of this major incident.

Qatar has formally joined the war on the US-Israeli side, having already said it took out a pair of Iranian jets. The tiny oil and gas rich GCC country Foreign Ministry stated that "the two Iranian planes shot down by Qatar yesterday were flying toward Doha and were warned before being shot down. Qatar is searching for the pilots."

Iran has continued its retaliation by targeting energy infrastructure across the Gulf, driving global oil and gas prices sharply higher. As we reported previously, Qatar's state-owned petroleum company suspended all LNG production after two of its facilities were hit.

The status of the vital Strait of Hormuz remains a big unknown, with Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announcing that the vital oil transit chokepoint for roughly one-fifth of global oil consumption is now "closed". While the consensus is that after the US blew up all or most of the Iranian Navy's vessels, it doesn't have the maritime power to effect a blockage, the IRGC can certainly wreak havoc through its drone and missile arsenal.

New Footage Shows US Base in Bahrain Under Iranian Missile Strike New video has surfaced online showing US military base in Bahrain that were targeted in recent hours by heavy Iranian missiles.
3.5K
Reply
Copy link

Iran has also continued missile attacks on Israel, with the Israeli military reporting interceptions over West Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Eilat. At least 10 people have been killed in Israel since Saturday. Many dozens, possibly in the hundreds, have been injured and wounded. Fox live shots and correspondent on the ground Trey Yingst have been offering proof that Israel's anti-air defenses are routinely being overwhelmed and significant impacts have resulted.

Costly interceptors are also being expended at a high rate across the Gulf, and these countries are urgently appealing for more from Washington, but they will soon be in short supply at this rate. The Wall Street Journal warns as follows:

Persian Gulf nations targeted by Iran have, so far, managed to limit the damage by deploying sophisticated U.S.-made air defenses against the hundreds of drones and missiles that have rained on their cities.

With costly interceptors and radar, all integrated with the U.S. military, the oil-rich Gulf Arab states have fielded some of the most advanced air defenses in the world, despite their small populations and militaries.

A crucial variable in this war, however, is whether these monarchies start running out of interceptors before the Iranian regime runs out of projectiles. At current burn rates, it could be very soon.

Alarmingly, initial White House talking points of a 'limited' campaign of mere days (and based on pre-war comments during the build-up) have now gone out the window as on Monday President Trump and Secretary Rubio indicated the operation could run for roughly four or five weeks. But they also admitted there's a basically open-ended timeline to "do whatever it takes" to eliminate Tehran’s missile and nuclear capabilities, and to destroy the country's missile arsenal.

⚡️Massive explosion in Tehran
1.7K
Reply
Copy link

But then here's what the Trump administration failed to take into account, or perhaps chose to completely ignore. Trita Parsi told The Economist:


"This is not a monarchy in which the shah is gone and you take out all of the male heirs." He explained: "This is a system—not a particularly popular system—but nevertheless one with a security establishment that is not dependent on a single person or a single family."

Pentagon brass doesn't seem to know what the plan is, how long it will last, or why they're there: "The hours, days, and perhaps weeks ahead will challenge you. There will be noise and confusion."

Adm. Brad Cooper, the top U.S. military officer at @CENTCOM, sent this message to the roughly 50,000 U.S. troops directly involved in operations against Iran, I'm told.
17.1K
Reply
Copy link

There are reports that in the instance of the Ayatollah's death under US-Israeli bombs, which is the first thing that happened Saturday as he was apparently not in hiding, Iran put a strict emergency protocol in place. This reportedly involved plans for the IRGC and various military units across the country to begin acting autonomously within their respective chains of command, so that a state decapitation strike won't disrupt the ongoing retaliation.

That retaliation has already killed at least six US service members stationed at Gulf bases:


The U.S. is facing increasing risks to its military forces and diplomatic presence in the Middle East as Iran is launching waves of missile and drone attacks across the region that are testing its ability to defend a swath of territory.

U.S. Central Command said that six servicemembers had been killed in the three-day-old campaign on Monday. The six died in a drone strike on a base in Kuwait, The Wall Street Journal reported. Separately, three American F-15 jets were downed by apparent friendly fire over Kuwait on Monday, in one of the most significant losses of equipment for the U.S. in the operation.

Bases that house U.S. forces have also come under attack in Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

In at least one instance troops were in a mobile trailer which served as a makeshift command center or office when an Iranian projectile hit.

The White House has meanwhile said it is not at all in diplomatic contact with the Iranians, who may want to impose a deeper cost before even starting a discussion for an offramp - and it's the same with the Gulf states - there doesn't seem to be any top-level contact.

Rubio and Hegseth have kept repeating that "this is not Iraq" and have insisted this is not another Neocon "endless war". They might be right in that what just opened up might prove far worse than the Iraq war. So far there's no US boots on the ground that we know of, but we're already at that admin talking point of 'we haven't ruled it out'. White House leadership has also been surprisingly open as to Israel's role in the US decision to attack Iran.

🎯STRUCK: The Iranian Regime’s Leadership Compound — the central headquarters have been dismantled This command headquarters was one of the most heavily secured assets in Iran. The compound that housed the regime’s most senior forum was struck by the IAF overnight using precise Show more
7.1K
Reply
Copy link

More latest headlines via Newsquawk: 

  • Israeli defence forces announce that they did not deploy ground troops in Iran, Israeli source report.
  • The IDF announces that they have struck Iran's leadership compound in Tehran.
  • IAEA confirms recent damage to entrance buildings of Iran's underground Natanz fuel enrichment plan.
  • Israel's Home Front announce early warning after detection of rockets fired from Iran toward Israel, Al Jazeera reported.
  • Israeli Military Spokesperson said it is not likely that Israel will deploy ground forces to Iran as it is not practical.
  • IDF spokesperson said launches detected from Iran and alerts expected in the northern area from the Golan to northern Sharon.
  • Iran's military said it targeted the Al Udeid base with missiles.
  • Iran's IRCG said they targeted the aircraft carrier "Lincoln" with 4 cruise missiles; The aircraft carrier "Lincoln" headed towards the southeastern Indian Ocean , Al Arabiya reported.
  • Member of Iran’s Assembly of Experts said choosing a successor to Supreme Leader Khamenei “won’t take long”, according to ISNA.
  • Hezbollah said it targeted the Ramat David Air Base in northern Israel.
  • US VP Vance said President Trump wants to make sure Iran never had nuclear weapons, adds the US has a lot of capacity in Iran.
  • US President Trump held a call with Kurdish leaders in Iraq on Sunday to discuss the US-Israel war with Iran and what might come next, according to three sources with knowledge of the called cited by Axios.
  • US is said to prepare for a 'pickup' of attacks in Iran during the next 24 hours, according to CNN.