Thursday, August 20, 2026

Trump unleashes 'most crushing economic war ever' on Iran, warns backers of consequences










Trump unleashes 'most crushing economic war ever' on Iran, warns backers of consequences


Published: Aug 20, 2026 3:27 PM
Updated: 5:35 PM



US President Donald Trump has unveiled a sweeping new economic offensive against Iran, warning that countries and companies helping Tehran circumvent sanctions will also face punishing financial consequences, according to international media reports.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump described the campaign as the “most crushing economic operation ever taken against any country”, saying Washington would impose unprecedented economic isolation on the Islamic republic.

“This will be economic warfare and Isolation on an unprecedented scale,” he said.

Trump argued that Tehran had been handed ample opportunity to reach an agreement with Washington but had failed to seize it.

“No one has given the Islamic Republic of Iran a greater opportunity to make a deal than me,” he said, adding that “Tragically, for them, they have failed to take it.”




He claimed Iran’s military capabilities had already suffered devastating losses, with its navy, air force and military production facilities destroyed and its currency reduced to near worthlessness. The Iranian regime, he said, was now “hanging by a thread”.

Trump warned that the punishment would extend beyond Iran, saying governments, businesses and financial institutions that provide Tehran with a “lifeline” could be hit with what he called tremendous economic consequences.

Among the activities targeted are oil smuggling, currency swap arrangements, cash transfers, exchange houses, ship registries and front companies. Trump said these channels must be shut down immediately, reiterating that Iran would not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.

‘Economic terrorism’

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi, however, dismissed Trump’s threat, accusing Washington of using the confrontation to divert attention from its own worsening fiscal problems, including soaring debt and interest costs.

“Doubling down on failed policies will only bring further defeat -and enmity of Iranians,” Araghchi said in a post on X on Thursday.

He also accused Washington of practising “economic terrorism”, arguing that the sanctions campaign could damage the wider global economy and undermine the sovereignty of countries beyond Iran.

Araghchi has previously accused the US of repeatedly tightening sanctions after earlier measures failed to force Tehran to change course, arguing that Washington’s approach has instead made a negotiated resolution to the six-month conflict more difficult.


Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi


The UAE has taken steps to distance itself economically from Iran, announcing on Tuesday that it was halting trade, commercial dealings and financial transactions with Tehran indefinitely.

The move followed a statement from the UAE defence ministry that two missiles launched from Iran had been detected before falling into the sea. Iran rejected the claim as baseless. The UAE, which hosts a major US military base, has long maintained extensive commercial links with Iran.

However, Trump’s broader effort to squeeze Iran economically could prove far more complicated when it comes to China.

China accounted for more than 80 percent of Iran’s seaborne oil exports in 2025, according to analytics firm Kpler, making it by far Tehran’s most important oil customer.

China is a major supplier to the US, including critical rare-earth minerals, and could retaliate if Trump moves aggressively to disrupt its trade with Iran.


***


Good boy, there's a doggy bone waiting for you in Tel Aviv😂😂😂

Anwar's Taiwan remarks need to be seen in their proper context











Tian Chua
Published: Aug 20, 2026 3:13 PM
Updated: 5:13 PM



COMMENT | Recent statements by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on China and Taiwan have created some controversy. He has appeared to cause outrage in some circles.

His remarks have been framed by some as an endorsement of Beijing using force to unify Taiwan. That interpretation, however, misreads both the letter and the spirit of his words.

Let me be clear from the outset: I am a friend of Taiwan. I deeply respect the Taiwanese people’s desire to preserve their way of life, and I would be devastated to see their society and economy ravaged by war. I wish to see peace and prosperity continue to prevail over the beautiful island.

Malaysia and Taiwan share generations of cultural and economic ties that I hope will flourish indefinitely, regardless of diplomatic status.

I do not speak for the prime minister nor for the Malaysian government. But I believe Anwar’s statement must be understood in its proper context - legal, diplomatic, and geopolitical.


What Anwar actually said

In his Al Jazeera interview, Anwar stated a simple truth: Malaysia, like the vast majority of nations - including the United States - recognises the One China Policy.

Under international law, Taiwan is part of China. This is not Anwar’s opinion or emotional preference. It is a recognition of international legal reality.

Then he went on to elaborate: If any foreign power threatened Malaysia’s territorial integrity - for example, by arming separatists in any state - our prime minister would be duty-bound to respond with every tool available, including force. That is the responsibility of every government to defend its sovereignty.

Every nation on earth reserves that right. Why, then, is China condemned for asserting what is considered an international norm?





What this doesn’t mean

I hope the people of Taiwan, and those who sympathise with Taiwan, can appreciate that recognising the One China Policy is not the same as endorsing violent reunification.

No neighbour - Malaysia included - wants war across the Taiwan Strait. We have too much to lose: trade, stability, and the lives of ordinary people.

One must read Anwar’s speech within the dynamics of current geopolitical turmoil. Anwar was not projecting ill wishes toward Taiwanese citizens. Nor was he deliberately appeasing Beijing. He was stating reality.

The interview was broadcast by Al Jazeera, a network with a global audience deeply familiar with the hypocrisies of international power politics.

The Al Jazeera interview was never really about Taipei or Beijing. It was about Washington, London, and Brussels.


Critique is for the West

Anwar’s sharper criticism was directed at Western powers that rushed to defend the island against so-called “Chinese aggression”.

His question is this: How can you claim to accept the One China Policy while simultaneously trying to restrict China’s lawful exercise of its rights within that very framework?

Admittedly, China’s hostile posturing over Taiwan might not be the most desirable or palatable for the international community or adjacent countries. However, the same powers now lecturing China on “peaceful resolution” have, in the last two decades alone:

  • Invaded Iraq on false pretences (2003), killing hundreds of thousands.
  • Bombed Libya into failed-state status (2011).

  • Armed and funded proxy wars in Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan.
  • Imposed crippling sanctions on Cuba, Iran, and Venezuela.
  • Launched an illegal war against Iran and massacred innocent civilians.
  • Supported Israel’s genocide acts against Palestinians.

There are plenty of cases of violent oppression against third-world countries with impunity, disregarding international law and, in some cases, endorsing the killing of foreign leaders and civilians.

This double standard has become routine. Yet no Western power would tolerate its own territory being fragmented or encroached upon. Yet these same nations reserve the absolute right to defend their own territory - by nuclear arms if necessary.


Consistent standard, or none at all

If the West genuinely desires peace across the Taiwan Strait, let it condemn all violations of sovereignty with equal vigour - whether in Gaza, Kyiv, or Taipei.

Let it apply the same standard to itself that it demands of others. Only then can its appeals for stability carry moral weight.

The international community faces a simple choice: uphold the rule of law for everyone, or admit to the “might-is-right global order”. This means “rules bind the weak and exempt the strong”.

Recognition of the One China Policy is not hostility toward Taiwan. It is a diplomatic reality. And if we are to avoid the very conflict we all fear, that reality must be engaged with consistent ethical standards that apply to all nations equally.

TIAN CHUA is a former Batu MP.


***


Well stated Tian Chua, and PMX also gave a sterling performance in the interview by al Jazeera - kudos

👍👍👍😁😁😁


'Kafir, murtad': DAP Malay leaders lament hurtful labels levelled at them





'Kafir, murtad': DAP Malay leaders lament hurtful labels levelled at them


Mastura Malak & Hariz Mohd
Published: Aug 20, 2026 10:00 AM
Updated: 3:10 PM




Since embarking on their political journey with DAP, party central executive committee member Sheikh Umar Bagharib Ali and vice-chairperson Syahredzan Johan have faced relentless criticism.

Among the labels hurled at them were "traitors" to the Malays and Islam, amid long-standing perceptions among some conservative Malays that DAP poses a threat to their interests and identity.

During an interview on an episode of KiniTV’s “Explain Sikit” podcast, the duo shared how they have endured some of the most painful attacks.

"To me, the worst and most hurtful label was when some called me a 'kafir' (infidel)," said Syahredzan (above, left).

"As a Muslim, that is something totally unacceptable because it has come to the extent of questioning my religious belief.

"That label actually makes me angry. Other than that, like being called 'barua' (lackey) and sorts, I think I have gotten used to it," the Bangi MP added.

According to Syahredzan, such nasty attacks mostly occurred online so far.

Similarly, Sheikh Umar said that while he had grown accustomed to the various insults hurled at him, being called a “kafir” still hurt.


DAP central executive committee member Sheikh Umar Bagharib Ali


‘Part and parcel of politics’

The former Paloh assemblyperson, however, mentioned that he had learned to ignore such labels, viewing them as part and parcel of his political struggle.

He said such accusations were merely perceptions that DAP’s rivals sought to cultivate for political gain.

"Please publish what I say here: DAP is not against Islam. DAP is a political party, and its political approach is social democracy.

"It is moving towards a more centrist and moderate position, advocating sound policies and upholding the aspirations and spirit of the Constitution, which has already accorded Islam and the Malays their proper place within the constitutional framework. DAP has never opposed this.

"Based on that, I reiterate that DAP is a political party, and all the criticisms we have received are perceptions deliberately created by political opponents in the course of political competition and elections in our country.

"Therefore, joining DAP has never been a problem for my faith, and I am fully confident and convinced of that," Sheikh Umar stressed.

According to Sheikh Umar, he was also puzzled as to how certain quarters could conclude that a Muslim becomes “murtad” (apostate) just by becoming a member of a political party like DAP.




Brickbats for PAS

Firing a salvo at PAS, Sheikh Umar said the Islamist party has been responsible for declaring other Muslims apostates just because they do not share PAS' political views.

The Dewan Negara member cited an incident in 1981 when PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang labelled Umno as “kafir” in his infamous sermon called “Amanat Haji Hadi”, which sparked a split among the Malays.

"The one that has been accusing others as infidels and questioning people's religious beliefs is, sorry to say, the party that uses an Islamic brand.

"There is actually no need for it to go that far, because our faith is not literally or directly tied to the political party or platform we choose to join, including DAP," said Sheikh Umar.


PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang


Regardless, the Johorean said he has never let his spirits wane because of the nasty labels. Instead, it has strengthened his resolve to stay in DAP.

However, he admits that such attacks had some impact on his family, especially his ageing parents who recently learned to use social media.

"So, what I do is I pray to Allah that I forgive these people (critics) because they actually do not know," Sheikh Umar added.


READ MORE: DAP's red line for quitting govt not yet defined, reform push is priority, leaders say


Penny Wong condemns ‘insulting’ decision to clear IDF over Gaza strikes that killed Australian aid worker Zomi Frankcom

 



Penny Wong condemns ‘insulting’ decision to clear IDF over Gaza strikes that killed Australian aid worker Zomi Frankcom

Foreign affairs minister says Australia is ‘outraged’ after Israeli government decided not to pursue criminal proceedings over 2024 triple drone strike on humanitarian convoy

Australia’s foreign affairs minister has expressed “outrage” and will call in the Israeli ambassador over the Israel Defense Forces decision overnight not to open a criminal investigation into Gaza strikes that killed Australian aid worker Zomi Frankcom.

In a statement released on Thursday, Penny Wong called the timing of the decision, on World Humanitarian Day, “especially insulting”.

Wong said she would call in Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Hillel Newman, for formal talks and directed Australia’s ambassador to Israel, Neil Hawkins, “to convey our views directly to Israel as the Australian government considers next steps”.

The April 2024 strike hit a convoy of World Central Kitchen vehicles, killing seven humanitarian workers from the US-based aid group, which has distributed food in Gaza throughout the war.

The aid group said at the time it had coordinated with the military over the movement of its cars. The vehicles, which had the group’s logo on their roofs visible from the air, were left incinerated and mangled, indicating a series of targeted strikes.

The IDF said on Wednesday it had mistaken several individuals in the vehicles for armed Hamas military operatives, and that the convoy deviated from the previously coordinated route. It concluded that “the decisions of the commanders did not raise reasonable suspicion of criminal misconduct”. Two officers were removed from their positions at the time and three others reprimanded.

Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email

One of those killed in the strike was Frankcom, an Australian aid worker. The Australian government has previously called the deaths a “tragedy and an outrage” and pressed for full accountability and “any appropriate criminal charges”. In February the Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said he had made it clear to Israel and its president, Isaac Herzog, that Australia expected transparency about Israel’s then-ongoing investigation into the incident.

Australian aid worker killed by Israeli airstrike in Gaza – video

“Australia is outraged the Israeli Government has decided not to pursue criminal proceedings against those responsible for killing Zomi Frankcom and her World Central Kitchen colleagues,” Wong said in her Thursday morning statement.

“The Australian government learned of Israel’s decision late last night, moments before it was announced, on World Humanitarian Day – which is especially insulting to Zomi’s loved ones, humanitarians and all Australians.

“Zomi represented the best of Australia. Her courage deserves to be celebrated. Her family deserves justice.”

Wong said the move “falls far short of the accountability we expect”.

“This is despite Israel Defense Forces admissions that the IDF strikes on Zomi and her colleagues’ vehicles were the result of serious failures to follow IDF procedures, mistaken identification and errors in decision-making.”

This was confirmed by special adviser air chief marshal Mark Binskin’s report, Wong said.

“Democracies seek and accept higher standards. The Australian Government will not stop pressing Israel for justice for Zomi and her colleagues.”

World Central Kitchen said it strongly disagreed with Israeli officials’ account of the airstrikes and their decision not to pursue a criminal investigation.

skip past newsletter promotion

“There has never been any excuse or justification for the attacks, and there is nothing in this account that does so. The decision is inconsistent with the full truth and deeply offensive,” it said in a statement.

“At the time of the lethal attacks, the IDF knew that our team in Gaza was unarmed and posing a threat to nobody. It had full visual clarity on our clearly marked humanitarian vehicles during the extended, multiple airstrikes. It knew our team’s movements, identities and activities in advance.”

Human rights expert Chris Sidoti said the federal government should send Newman, the Israeli ambassador, home.

Sidoti, a former human rights commissioner, was a member of the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel.

“The minister, when she sees the ambassador, should tell him that he’s going home. I don’t support breaking diplomatic relations with Israel. I don’t support the closing of embassies, but this bloke is clearly an unacceptable representative.”

The Greens leader, Larissa Waters, demanded Israel’s government be hit with new sanctions.

“Now, strong words are not enough,” she told ABC radio on Thursday.

“The Australian government sending some strongly worded statements has meant nothing. Now it is time that the Australian government puts on sanctions against the state of Israel and stops sending weapons parts to this genocide.”

In April this year, Wong paid tribute to Frankcom on the second anniversary of her death, saying “people like Zomi are rare and their selflessness should not only be celebrated but protected”.