Tuesday, June 16, 2026

Dark Times was from 1981 to 2003


I have decided NOT to publish the piece of news "warning Malaysians of dark times"


😌😌😌😇



Selamat Awal Muharram Mateys 👍😁💖

 




Six firms probed over alleged RM5.7m AADK tender cartel, says MyCC






Six firms probed over alleged RM5.7m AADK tender cartel, says MyCC



MyCC chairman Tan Sri Idrus Harun said investigations conducted by the commission found indications that the companies had engaged in information sharing and collusion during the preparation and submission of their tender bids. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2026 2:44 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, June 16 — The Malaysian Competition Commission (MyCC) has issued a Proposed Decision against six companies over suspected involvement in a bid-rigging cartel linked to a RM5.7 million food supply tender under the National Anti-Drug Agency (AADK).

MyCC chairman Tan Sri Idrus Harun said investigations conducted by the commission found indications that the companies had engaged in information sharing and collusion during the preparation and submission of their tender bids.

According to him, the alleged conduct involved agreements that had the effect of significantly preventing, restricting or distorting competition in relation to public procurement for the supply of raw, fresh and dried food products.

“These companies were found to have successively breached Section 4(1), read together with Sections 4(2)(d) and 4(3) of the Competition Act 2010 [Act 712]. The tenders involved carried a procurement value of RM5.7 million,” he said in a statement today.


However, Idrus stressed that the Proposed Decision represents only a preliminary finding and should not be interpreted as conclusive proof that the companies had violated Act 712.

He said all six companies have been informed of the proposed financial penalties that may be imposed should the findings be upheld.

The companies have been given 30 days from the date of receiving the Proposed Decision to submit written representations and will also be allowed to present oral representations before the commission at a later date.


“MyCC will only issue a Final Decision after taking into account the representations submitted by the companies together with all evidence gathered throughout the investigation process,” he said. — Bernama

PKR says it will contest Puteri Wangsa in Johor election, seat previously ceded to Muda





PKR says it will contest Puteri Wangsa in Johor election, seat previously ceded to Muda



Johor PKR vice-chairman Jimmy Puah reportedly said PKR will contest Puteri Wangsa in the coming Johor election. — File picture by Yusof Mat Isa

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2026 2:59 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, June 16 — PKR is reportedly set to contest Puteri Wangsa in the coming Johor election, taking over a state seat that was given to Muda under its previous electoral arrangement with Pakatan Harapan (PH) in 2022.

Free Malaysia Today reported that Johor PKR vice-chairman Jimmy Puah said the arrangement had been agreed among PH parties, including Amanah, which had also been eyeing the constituency.

“I can confirm that PKR will contest Puteri Wangsa. Our candidate will, of course, be someone who can win,” the Tebrau MP was quoted as saying.

His remarks come after Johor Amanah chief Aminolhuda Hassan reportedly said discussions over Puteri Wangsa and Larkin had not yet produced a final outcome.

FMT reported that Amanah is likely to be fielded in Larkin, a seat contested by PKR in the previous Johor state election.

Muda’s Amira Aisya Abd Aziz won Puteri Wangsa in 2022 by 7,114 votes, while Barisan Nasional’s Hairi Mad Shah defended Larkin with a 6,178-vote majority.


Prawn dispute a rising threat to Thai-Malaysia relations


Murray Hunter
Jun 16, 2026



Prawn dispute a rising threat to Thai-Malaysia relations


What began as reciprocal concerns over food safety has morphed into a retaliatory ban with outsized economic and political consequences, exposing deeper vulnerabilities in bilateral ties






My latest from The Vibes


A SEEMINGLY niche trade spat over shrimp is rapidly escalating into a diplomatic irritant that could undermine the historically cordial and economically intertwined relationship between Thailand and Malaysia.

What began as reciprocal concerns over food safety has morphed into a retaliatory ban with outsized economic and political consequences, exposing deeper vulnerabilities in bilateral ties.

Since June 1, 2026, Malaysia has suspended imports of five key Thai shrimp species — brown tiger prawn, banana prawn, whiteleg shrimp, giant tiger prawn, and blue shrimp, while tightening scrutiny on Thai sea bass.

Malaysian authorities frame the move as a necessary food safety measure in response to Thailand’s earlier restrictions on Malaysian seabass following detections of chemical residues.

Thailand, however, sees it as disproportionate retaliation.

The economic stakes are significant. Official Thai estimates put affected monthly exports at 300-400 tonnes, but opposition figures and industry players, including People’s Party deputy leader Veerayooth Kanchoochat, warn the real volume approaches 3,000 tonnes.

Redirecting this surplus into Thailand’s domestic market risks a price collapse, hammering already struggling shrimp farmers in the south.

Thailand’s once-dominant shrimp industry has shrunk dramatically from 640,000 tonnes annually at its peak to around 270,000 tonnes today.

The industry is plagued by persistent disease outbreaks and lagging innovation compared to agile competitors like Ecuador.

Beyond immediate losses estimated in tens of millions of US dollars, the dispute threatens broader ripple effects.

The Southern Thai provinces, heavily reliant on cross-border seafood trade, face livelihood threats that could fuel local discontent.

Thailand has signalled readiness to escalate the matter to the WTO and ASEAN if bilateral talks falter, moves that risk airing grievances in multilateral forums and drawing unwanted regional attention.



Image from www.shutterstock.com


This friction arrives at a sensitive time. Thailand and Malaysia share deep people-to-people ties, extensive border commerce, joint ASEAN initiatives, and cooperation on security and tourism.

Yet recurring trade irritants compounded by occasional nationalist rhetoric on both sides are eroding trust.

The shrimp ban highlights a number of structural issues.

Differing regulatory standards, competitive pressures in global seafood markets, and a tendency toward tit-for-tat responses rather than collaborative problem-solving.

If unresolved swiftly through quiet diplomacy, the dispute could chill investment flows, complicate border management, and foster public suspicion.

Citizens on both sides may perceive the other as protectionist or unreliable, weakening the goodwill essential for deeper integration in areas like the Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle.

Both nations have much to lose from prolonged acrimony.

Malaysia gains reliable Thai supply chains; Thailand accesses a valuable neighbouring market.

As two of ASEAN’s more developed economies, they should model mature dispute resolution.

The prawn spat is a deep warning. Small triggers can ignite larger fires when underlying economic anxieties and political sensitivities are involved.

Swift, transparent negotiations focused on mutual food safety standards and market access would not only save the shrimp trade but also safeguard the broader Thai-Malaysian partnership.

Failure to do so risks turning a manageable disagreement into a lasting dent in neighbourly relations. – June 15, 2026

Malaysia’s Middleclass Losers


Murray Hunter
Jun 16, 2026



Malaysia’s Middleclass Losers


The middleclass is under stress



Man in Malaysia. Photo by Firdaus Roslan on Unsplash



Malaysia’s middleclass is being financially squeezed. The middle class is categorized as the M40 group (middle 40% of income earners, roughly RM4,850–RM10,960 per month). This group is facing financial pressure in 2025 due to a combination of economic reforms. While Malaysians are being told they are better off financially, their feelings are contrary. Rising costs, policies and structural challenges are diminishing middleclass spending ability and turning them into financial slaves of society, locked into this by their work and lifestyles they have grown accustomed to after so many decades of growing national prosperity.

Targeted Subsidy Reforms have put many within the middleclass out of range of subsidies their livelihoods were based upon. The government has shifted from blanket subsidies to targeted ones, particularly for fuel (e.g., RON95 petrol subsidies phased out for the T15 group, earning above RM13,000/month) and electricity. Middle-class households, especially those in urban areas like Kuala Lumpur, often fall just outside subsidy eligibility, facing higher costs for essentials. For instance, the removal of petrol subsidies could add RM1,000–RM2,000 monthly to household expenses for some families.

New Tax Measures are eroding middleclass incomes. The 2025 budget introduced taxes impacting the middle class, including a 2% tax on dividends exceeding RM100,000 and an expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST) covering services like insurance, financial planning, and private education. These taxes, initially aimed at the wealthy, have hit urban middle-class families who rely on these services, increasing their financial burden.

The rising Cost of Living is eroding a family’s ability to spend. Urban middle-class households face higher living costs, with incomes barely covering essentials in cities like Kuala Lumpur or Johor Bahru. For example, an M40 household earning RM7,000/month may struggle in urban areas due to high housing, education, and healthcare costs.

Many M40 households face “lifestyle inflation,” juggling rising costs and family obligations, such as supporting B40 relatives. A single financial shock, like a medical bill or job loss, can push these households toward financial instability, as they often lack a sufficient savings buffer. This is especially the case after the Covid era, where many families and proprietors of MSMEs are still facing debt repayments. M40 households are facing rising costs inhibiting their ability to save for when they need money to cover unexpected expenses. The relative ease that M40 households can obtain credit cards has played a role in pushing them into a debt lifestyle. The bottom line is households are not saving, they are paying off debt instead.

One of the major challenges to the Malaysian economy today are stagnant wages. Despite Malaysia’s economic growth (projected at 4–4.8% in 2025), wage growth lags behind inflation and productivity gains. The benefits of economic growth are not being passed onto M40 households. The middle class, particularly young graduates, struggles to find high-skilled jobs, with 42% of late primary-school children showing poor learning outcomes, limiting future workforce competitiveness. This compounds financial strain as aspirations for upward mobility and thus higher wages are unmet.

Malaysia has not been immune to pressure on the Ringgit. The ringgit’s volatility, despite a 0.8% appreciation against the US dollar in Q1 2025, increases costs for imported goods, which hit urban middle-class households harder due to their consumption patterns. Global trade tensions and higher shipping costs (e.g., due to Red Sea disruptions) further drive-up prices, squeezing budgets. The rise of the cost of goods in many categories is greater than the official inflation rate.

Malaysia has fallen victim to the “Middle Income Trap”, where middleclass families are unable to transition into the upper-middle class. This is partly a result of stagnant productivity and the failure of corporations to more equally share their profits to their respective labour forces.

While the government has been focusing on programs for the poor, the middle class feels pinched by policies that disproportionately affect their disposable income and limited safety nets. The government’s income classification system is not picking up this problem (or politicians are ignoring it). Malaysia’s statistical system needs an overhaul to better reflect regional cost-of-living differences and multidimensional poverty. The B40-M40-T20 classification system fails to account for these disparities, leaving urban M40 households feeling squeezed.

As a result, many families have been forced to curtail spending decisions. This means deferring holidays, going out less for dinner, wearing old clothes for longer, not buying consumables, and even cutting down on the food they buy outside the house. Come the end of 2025 and into 2026, aggregate household spending will no longer be a major driver of the economy.

With pensions not rising according to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), tolls rising, more taxes coming, and living costs rising, the middleclass is being squeezed. This is happening at the same time the T20 is getting a ‘free ride’ from the government. Taxes on the T20 have not risen proportionally to the middleclass.

Politically, the middleclass is a powerful voting cohort for Pakatan Harapan. Pakatan relies on the middleclass vote in urban areas, where it holds many of its seats. Failure to address the above problem will logically cost Pakatan dearly in the seats it holds.

The government still has three annual budgets to address this mostly unidentified issue. Overlooking the middleclass will be an electoral disaster. Budget 2026 needs to be a budget for the middleclass to get them back onboard and maintain a robust economy in 2026.


Ikram member hit with 158 corruption charges over RM98.27m in organisation funds










Ikram member hit with 158 corruption charges over RM98.27m in organisation funds


Farah Solhi
Published: Jun 16, 2026 2:36 PM
Updated: 5:30 PM




A member of Ikram Malaysia was charged at the Shah Alam Sessions Court today with 158 counts of abusing his position for gratification involving RM98.27 million of the organisation’s funds.

Fakhrudin Abd Karim, 56, faces 149 charges of abuse of power as an officer of a public body and authorised signatory to Hulu Selangor Ikram’s bank account.

He is accused of directing RM81.95 million to be transferred to a company, Ehsan Solution Care, which is allegedly linked to him.

He also faces nine additional charges of committing the same offence by directing RM16.32 million to be transferred into two of his personal bank accounts.

Ikram, an Islamic NGO established in 2009, is involved in education, welfare, humanitarian aid, and community development programmes across the country.

The offences allegedly took place through 158 transactions at Hulu Selangor Ikram’s office at Adenium Business Centre in Bukit Beruntung, Rawang, between Jan 6, 2021 and Aug 6, 2025.





The transactions involved amounts ranging from RM100,000 to RM10 million.

All charges were framed under Section 23(1) of the MACC Act 2009, which carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and a fine of not less than five times the amount of gratification or RM10,000, whichever is higher.

Clad in a brown jacket, Fakhrudin stood steadily as the charges were read alternately by two court interpreters before judge Nasir Nordin. He pleaded not guilty to all charges.


Bail fixed at RM500k with conditions

MACC senior deputy director of the legal and prosecution division Ahmad Akram Gharib informed the court that the offences were non-bailable, but said the prosecution would not object should the court exercise its discretion to grant bail.

He proposed bail of RM1 million with two sureties, along with additional conditions that Fakhrudin surrender his passport and refrain from interfering with prosecution witnesses.


MACC


Defence counsel N Sivananthan appealed for bail to be reduced to RM300,000, saying his client had no objection to the other conditions.

Sivananthan also told the court that MACC had frozen Fakhrudin’s bank accounts, as well as those belonging to his family members, since April. He added that the accused is a father of 10.

The court granted bail at RM500,000 with two sureties, ordered Fakhrudin to surrender his passport, and barred him from interfering with witnesses.

The court fixed Aug 7 for case management.

Lawyer Ashwida Abd Samad, who held a watching brief for Ikram, told reporters that Fakhrudin has been suspended and barred from participating in the organisation’s decision-making processes.

Yesterday, Free Malaysia Today quoted MACC chief commissioner Abdul Halim Aman as saying an individual would face 158 charges at the Shah Alam Sessions Court, with additional money laundering charges to be brought at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court next week.

He said MACC’s Op Sutra investigation, which centred on allegations of misappropriation of public funds, found that the person leading the organisation was believed to have siphoned off hundreds of millions of ringgit through a network of companies.


***


I wonder if the accused Fakhrudin Abd Karim could be a 'Chinese' (in disguise?) - In a Straits Time report (29 August 2022), Abdul Hadi had claimed that the root of corruption in Malaysia was the influence non-Malays wielded over the economy and politics. "These groups who chase illicit gains... damage our politics as they are the roots for corruption and the majority of them are non-Muslims and non-Bumiputras."


Bersama Is Malaysia’s Best Hope Now

 

Dennis Ignatius

 

~ Provoking discussion, dissent & debate on politics, diplomacy, human rights & civil society.

Bersama Is Malaysia’s Best Hope Now

Tags

, , , ,


[1] As we head into another election cycle, many voters feel weary, frustrated, and close to despair. Public faith in the political system has all but evaporated. Whichever party wins, the outcome feels depressingly familiar: grand promises, unmet expectations, and a country often worse off than before. Corruption remains rampant. Cronyism flourishes. Injustice persists. Meanwhile, life remains a struggle for all too many.

[2] Anwar Ibrahim is but the latest in a long line of leaders promising hope but leaving only disappointment. I decided some time ago that if the next election offered nothing but the same discredited faces, I would not vote. Participating in a futile exercise makes a mockery of democracy.

[3] For some time now, voters have felt politically trapped, having to always choose between the lesser of two or three evils – Pakatan Harapan, Barisan Nasional or Perikatan Nasional. That is a terrible situation to be in because it means that no matter who wins, you still end up with evil.

[4] Which is why Parti Bersama is drawing attention. Rafizi and Nik Nazmi are building something genuinely different: a party that funds itself through ordinary citizens, recruits candidates openly, and treats Malaysians as citizens to be served rather than ethnic blocs to be exploited. It is a conscious repudiation of the backroom deals, patronage networks, and money politics that have corrupted Malaysian governance for decades. Unlike parties chasing shortcuts to power, they are building a real grassroots movement for change. 

[5] Their platform reflects this too — less preoccupied with race and religion than with building a prosperous, inclusive, and just society. Social security reform, migrant labour policy, institutional accountability, democratic reform — these have been promised before and quietly shelved. Bersama seems intent on making them the centre of its politics, not the footnote.

[6] Both men have deep roots in the Reformasi movement. It has defined their adult lives and their political careers. They know what the movement stood for — and what it has become. Walking away from PKR couldn’t have been easy. That they did it anyway speaks of an abiding commitment to what Reformasi was always meant to be. They also represent the generational change the country needs — younger, widely respected, and unburdened by the baggage that has made so many of their predecessors objects of disdain, if not contempt.

[7] Critics have noted that both men served as ministers in Anwar’s cabinet without particular distinction, and that Rafizi moved against Anwar only after losing a party election. These are fair points. But they miss something important. Rafizi and Nik Nazmi walked away from power, patronage, and the comfort of incumbency to build something from scratch — on principle, with a lot of their own money, without guaranteed reward. That is not the behaviour of opportunists but people who are passionate about their cause.

[8] I have been disappointed before. I backed Mahathir in GE14 and Anwar in GE15, and came to regret both. So I understand the scepticism. Yes, Bersama is untested. Yes, Rafizi and Nik Nazmi have little record to run on. Yes, I may end up adding their names to my long list of political regrets.

[9] But what exactly is the safe choice? BN? PN? PH? We have tested all of them and found them wanting. The risk isn’t in supporting Bersama. The risk is in telling ourselves that the same corrupt, incompetent, dishonest or bigoted politicians will somehow do better the next time around. That is not caution. That is delusion.

[10] There is something else. Twenty-five thousand Malaysians — among them, by most accounts, a majority of Malays — signed up within days of Bersama’s launch. Many had never joined a political party before. The numbers suggest something simple: a public tired of being managed, frightened, and taken for granted. That is not a data point. That is the sound of a country that has not given up on itself, of a country coming alive again because, finally, there’s an alternative.

[11] The case for Bersama is clear: they are the only party that is trying to do politics differently, and Malaysia desperately needs politics done differently. They have the vision, the integrity, and the courage to build something our country has never had — a politics of principle over patronage, of citizens over cronies, of the future over the past. Back them. Hold them to their promises. And give our country the chance it deserves. For the first time in a long time, something better is possible. Do not let this moment pass.

[Dennis Ignatius |Kuala Lumpur | Tuesday,  16 June 2017]

Is it Anwar's last hurrah?












P Gunasegaram
Published: Jun 16, 2026 8:00 AM
Updated: 10:02 AM




COMMENT | With all the hullabaloo muddling and muddying the terrain, it now seems likely that parliamentary polls may go full term, raising questions, given his increasingly tenuous predicament, whether Anwar Ibrahim will even be a candidate in the next one.

We can unpack the recent events, but it's more difficult to understand the underlying reasons and determine which of the moves are significant and which parties will benefit the most.

One of the major winners from unfolding events may again be PAS, while Umno may do well in the Johor state election and perhaps Negeri Sembilan but not so great elsewhere.

Casualties will be Anwar’s fortunes, along with PKR and Bersatu, while the fate of dark horse newcomer Parti Bersama Malaysia may be mixed and even encouraging.

There’s a lot to absorb in mere weeks following the long seeming calm after Anwar renewed ties with Umno and Sarawak, making promises to both as he cobbled together a loose alliance, stable on the surface but with deep undercurrents beneath post-15th general election in November 2022.




Despite appearances of calm, there was dissension waiting to bubble up at the right time. Anwar’s excessive comfort cost him as Umno showed its hands despite many concessions given, dissolving the Johor state assembly and promising to contest all seats in the state.

It has been a rocking, roiling month for politics in May as Umno announced on May 16 it will contest all state seats in Johor, throwing the fragile Madani coalition headed by Anwar into chaos and for the PM to give a sharp rebuke to Umno at a Harapan summit the following day.

As if that was not enough, even as the Harapan summit was in progress and Anwar with his hands full with Umno’s intransigence, former PKR ministers and MPs Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad dropped a bombshell.

The duo exited PKR and Parliament, uniting under the dormant Bersama to push a fresh agenda for Malaysians, vowing to ally with no other party and fighting for a new agenda which was announced in some detail on their website.


Anwar’s woes continue

Anwar’s woes continued into June when PAS ended its dalliance with Bersatu, terminating political ties after six years. It was announced by its president Abdul Hadi Awang on June 9 on the back of continued wrangling between the two parties.




Not so bad for Harapan and PKR, but PAS seems amenable to making political pacts with other parties, including Umno, which should worry the Madani coalition a lot about what Umno is up to, even if now that is with regard to Johor only. Nothing says it can’t happen for parliamentary elections too.

And then former Bersatu deputy president Hamzah Zainudin, who has fallen out with the party president Muhyiddin Yassin, announced he has formed a new party called Parti Wawasan Negara.

It’s a mystery how it was formed so fast and whether they have the necessary approvals, but the party will be aligned to the Perikatan Nasional coalition.

What is significant is that the new party has the support of PAS, whose president Hadi was present to lend his support. In fact, Hamzah said the party’s name was approved by PAS’ leadership, including Hadi, who was at the so-called “Reset” gathering. Hadi even launched the meeting.




Also present were PN chairperson Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar, Gerakan president Dominic Lau, and Kelantan Menteri Besar Nassuruddin Daud. Significantly, Samsuri is a rising star within PAS and vice president.

It is often speculated that either he or Hamzah may be prime ministerial material if PAS should be asked to form the next government.

Hadi also announced in his officiating speech at the so-called “Reset” convention on Saturday that PAS and its allies within PN have decided to retain Hamzah as its parliamentary opposition leader.

Now, this coalition seems rather strange considering that PAS and Bersatu are the main parties in it and PAS has announced they are cutting political ties with Bersatu. But it looks like if the PN coalition remains, it will be controlled by PAS and Wawasan Negara, sidelining Muhyiddin.

Hamzah’s Wawasan Negara has the backing of 19 previous Bersatu MPs, leaving six with Muhyiddin. Together with PAS’ 43, they form the backbone, accounting for 62 of PN’s 68 seats. The other two parties, Gerakan and MIPP, don’t have any seats.


PAS in strong position

And then on Saturday night too, former Umno member and minister, lawyer Zaid Ibrahim, joined PAS. He said in a Facebook post on Sunday: “Last night I was welcomed as a PAS member by its top national leaders. They're warm, sincere, and friendly.


Lawyer Zaid Ibrahim (right) has joined PAS


“I will repay their faith. I will work hard to dispel the image of PAS as an extreme anti-democratic party, not suitable for a multicultural Malaysia.

“On the contrary, PAS is the only Malay-majority party with the strength and resolve to do away with inequality, hegemony and class preferences. The essence of Islam will be the governing principle.

“You will not have under the PAS rule where we are described as equal, but some are more equal than others. That's why PAS will govern Malaysia together with like-minded progressive MPs after the next GE.”

That’s a coup of sorts for PAS: a Malay liberal who has previously been a member of Umno, DAP and PKR - the three other major parties in Malaysia besides PAS - has unequivocally endorsed PAS. A feather in PAS’ cap even if one thought of Zaid as an itinerant party hopper.

The developments perhaps favour PAS most, which seems to have a more coherent strategy going forward than the other three major parties, PKR, DAP and Umno/BN. Bersatu had previously rode on PAS’ robes to gain 25 seats but is now left with six.




By aligning with Wawasan Negara, PAS hopes to have some semblance of multiracialism and moderation. That is helped by Zaid coming into PAS and extolling its virtues, including an endorsement as the only party which might work for all.

Together with the groundwork that it has been doing to strengthen its position and extend its support base, PAS is probably the strongest, best organised party going into the polls and stands the best chance of getting the greatest number of seats for the second time in a row.

Umno is all gung-ho about Johor, but as with previous polls, it has no standing in the Malay heartland where PAS and its allies reign supreme. Even if it retains Johor, it is not likely to do much better elsewhere.

PAS is too smart to ally with Umno in areas where it is dominant, although Umno may make overtures in that direction. Umno’s performance is likely to be middling or even worse at GE16 for Parliament. It has nothing new to offer.

With Chinese and non-Malay support, DAP will still likely pull through but probably could lose seats because of its voicelessness on important issues and the rising support for the Bersama duo, Rafizi and Nik Nazmi, where they are likely to take some urban votes from DAP.


Bersama leaders Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad (left) and Rafizi Ramli


The party most likely to be wiped out in the next election is Bersatu, and with it the exit of Muhyiddin from politics. Its standing of 25 seats in the last election is most likely entirely due to aligning with PAS. They could lose all their seats.


Uncertain future

Anwar’s PKR faces a rather uncertain future from Bersama, which is mounting a credible, coordinated and early challenge to almost all of PKR’s seats, with 10 MPs already in the bag by some counts.

Peculiarly, any support that Anwar may have through Harapan post GE16 may continue to come from DAP, the largest party in the coalition with 40 seats compared to PKR’s 31 and Umno/BN’s 30.

It’s hard to see how Anwar can win enough to ensure the largest number of seats for Harapan to ensure he gets a chance to form the government again. That is likely to pass on to PAS.

It’s unlikely that even if there was some kind of electoral pact with PAS, the Islamic party will give up an opportunity to get its own prime minister. Anwar must be able to see this and therefore will likely go for a full term and announce his resignation before the polls.




As for dark horse Bersama, it is likely to make a significant impact by taking seats in urban areas previously the domain of PKR and even DAP. They may do very much better than expected, but even if they don’t, they will likely set a base for the future by retaining their deposits.

As the only party which has nothing to lose and everything to gain, the possibility for significant upside surprise for Bersama cannot be dismissed. They are, so far, acting true to their intentions, asking for a review of Selangor’s controversial guidelines for places of worship of non-Muslims, for instance.

One thing for sure, this is not an election that Malaysians are going to sit out. Expect participation to increase even if early polls are not called.



P GUNASEGARAM cannot ever understand the logic that you should protest by not voting. If necessary, just choose the best of the worst.


Higher Education Ministry weighs legal action after Haim Hilman alleges ‘backdoor’ entry into public universities






Higher Education Ministry weighs legal action after Haim Hilman alleges ‘backdoor’ entry into public universities



The Ministry of Higher Education is considering legal action over what it described as unfounded allegations by Jitra assemblyman Haim Hilman Abdullah concerning the public university admission system. — Picture via Facebook/Haim Hilman Abdullah

Monday, 15 Jun 2026 8:26 PM MYT


PUTRAJAYA, June 15 — The Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) is considering legal action over what it described as unfounded allegations by Jitra assemblyman Dr Haim Hilman Abdullah concerning the public university admission system.

In a statement today, the ministry said it was reviewing appropriate legal avenues to safeguard the integrity of MOHE, public universities and the country’s higher education system against slander and baseless accusations.

It said Haim Hilman had made allegations, including claims that public universities were ‘selling places meant for our children to those with money’ and that tens of thousands of students had entered public higher education institutions through a ‘back door’.

The latest instance involved a video of his speech posted on Facebook following a public ceramah held in conjunction with the Negeri Sembilan state election campaign on June 13.


“Such allegations are not only serious, but also have the potential to undermine the reputation and credibility of the country’s higher education system, including public universities, university management, government officials and thousands of students who entered through legitimate admission channels.

“It must be stressed that this is not the first time Haim Hilman made such allegations against MOHE,” the ministry said.

MOHE said it remained open to constructive, fact-based criticism, but any allegations that could erode public confidence in the country’s higher education institutions must be supported by strong evidence.


The ministry added that it would not allow any party to irresponsibly tarnish the reputation of the country’s education institutions through unsubstantiated allegations without being held accountable for their statements. — Bernama

‘Looks competitive, but only one bidder fits’: MoF finds signs of government tender system being gamed






‘Looks competitive, but only one bidder fits’: MoF finds signs of government tender system being gamed



Treasury Secretary-General Tan Sri Johan Mahmood Merican presents a souvenir to Universiti Teknologi MARA Vice-Chancellor and Malaysian Statutory Bodies Conference President Prof Datuk Dr Shahrin Sahib @ Sahibuddin during the opening ceremony of the conference in Putrajaya on June 15, 2026. — Bernama pic

Monday, 15 Jun 2026 8:26 PM MYT


PUTRAJAYA, June 15 — The Ministry of Finance (MOF) has detected irregularities in government tender procurement processes through the practice of tailoring tender specifications to favour specific vendors, said Treasury Secretary-General Tan Sri Johan Mahmood Merican.

He added that there have been incidents showing that while the tender process initially appeared competitive, evaluations of financial and technical aspects ultimately left only one qualified company because the set specifications were skewed toward a particular vendor.

He stated that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is also the Minister of Finance, has halted the practice of direct negotiations for government tender procurements.

“Now, almost all procurements are executed via tender. However, as we all know, Malaysians can be quite creative when all tenders are implemented.


“We are seeing many incidents where the tender looks good on paper, but after financial and technical evaluations, only one bidder remains because all the specifications were tailored toward a single vendor,” he said during his opening speech at the 2026 Malaysian Statutory Bodies Conference here today.

Also present were Public Service Department (JPA) Deputy Director-General (Development) Datuk Dr. Mohd Bakhari Ismail and Ministry of Entrepreneur Development and Cooperatives (KUSKOP) Secretary-General Datuk Seri Khairul Dzaimee Daud.

Others in attendance included Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Vice-Chancellor and President of the Association of Statutory Bodies of Malaysia (PBBM) Prof. Datuk Dr. Shahrin Sahib @ Sahibuddin, and Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) Director-General Datuk Dr. Ahmad Parveez Ghulam Kadir.


Elaborating further, Johan said this issue has been detected repeatedly across several agencies, and the Prime Minister is taking a firm stance against these occurrences.

“I wouldn’t mention this if it had only happened once. The MOF tracks these matters, and this is happening across various agencies, including the MOF itself. On this issue, the Prime Minister is taking a strict stand as part of the agenda to reform government procurement governance,” he said.

Johan said the government has passed the Government Procurement Bill 2025, which strengthens accountability and enforcement actions.

“Previously, government procurement issues were treated merely as administrative matters; if someone had retired, no action could be taken against them. But now, with the Government Procurement Bill, even I am not safe after retirement.

“I could also face punitive action if I commit any irregularities in government procurement. That is among the approaches to enhance procurement regulations and governance,” he said.

Meanwhile, Johan noted that statutory bodies serve as key institutions within the country’s administrative and development landscape.

“The role they play involves not only delivering services to the people but also driving the nation’s economic development, innovation, education, investment, and social well-being,” he added.

Themed “Statutory Bodies & National Aspirations: Shaping the Future,” the conference – organised by PBBM in collaboration with MPOB and the Majlis Amanah Rakyat (Mara) – serves as a strategic platform to discuss the role of statutory bodies in supporting the national development agenda by strengthening governance, leadership, organisational transformation, public sector reform, and service digitalisation. — Bernama

Monday, June 15, 2026

BERATUS UNEMPLOYED BERATUR INTERVIEW JAWATAN KOSONG DI INDIA. BERIBU UNEMPLOYED BERATUR INTERVIEW JAWATAN KOSONG DI MELAKA

 

Monday, June 15, 2026

BERATUS UNEMPLOYED BERATUR INTERVIEW JAWATAN KOSONG DI INDIA. BERIBU UNEMPLOYED BERATUR INTERVIEW JAWATAN KOSONG DI MELAKA.


 1. Berita dari India. Beratus orang penganggur beratur untuk interview jawatan kosong di Orissa di India. Tak tahu berita lama mana tapi bukan lama sangat. Ramai daripada mereka ini masih tiada peluang kerja.



 2. Berita dari Melaka (lihat di bawah).  Beribu orang penganggur beratur untuk interview jawatan kosong di Melaka.  




Thousands of job seekers turned up at a hotel in Melaka after a semiconductor manufacturer offered starting salaries of RM3,500, creating a queue that stretched nearly 1km at its peak

held at Holiday Inn Melaka from 8am to 4pm yesterday, 14 June, and aimed to fill around 400 vacancies for operator and technician positions.

massive turnout, with applicants arriving hours before registration opened and roads surrounding the venue becoming congested with vehicles believed to belong to job seekers.

According to reports, some job seekers began queuing as early as 5am. By morning, the line had extended along the main road leading to the hotel

My Comments:

Pagi ini saya dan isteri menyaksikan satu peristiwa yang benar-benar menyedihkan. Seorang lelaki Melayu muda sedang membuat penghantaran makanan dengan motosikalnya sambil membawa dua orang anaknya. Seorang kanak-kanak kecil duduk di depan manakala seorang bayi yang lebih kecil berada dalam baby carrier yang diikat pada dada si ayahnya. Jelas sekali si ibu sedang bekerja dan si ayah tidak mempunyai sesiapa lagi untuk menjaga anak-anak tersebut. Saya tidak tahu berapa lama anak-anak itu terpaksa berada di atas motosikal, dibawa ke sana sini bersama ayah mereka — di bawah panas matahari. Mereka tidak boleh berlari, bermain, malah susah pergi ke tandas sekalipun jika perlu. Satu pemandangan yang menyedihkan, tetapi beginilah keadaan di negara ini. Rakyat biasa, terutamanya orang Melayu, terlalu banyak menanggung penderitaan.

Padahal negara kita kaya raya. Setiap kali penjual ubat dan Abu Khaddab buka mulut mereka sebut berbeliyon-beliyon Ringgit untuk projek ini dan itu. 

Atau mereka ditangkap rasuah berpuluh juta Ringgit. Baru ini seekor Jembalang Betina pula disaman berpuluh juta sebab 'ghaibkan' jewellery mewah.

Berita panas sekarang Rohingya bermaharajalela mampu membuat rumah apartmen EMPAT tingkat. 



Illegally built? Hello brader tapi bangunan sudah built lah. Bangunan sudah siap sejak zaman Saloma kah? Nampak tak kabel letrik hitam itu (yellow circle)? Siapa lulus pasang kabel letrik? Sebelum boleh lulus mesti ada bayar fulus. Depa ada bayar api dan air tak? Ada resit tak? Mana resit dia? 

Sekarang sudah pecah tembelang depa nak roboh pula bangunan ini. Tapi ada orang kata perlu ada peruntukan RM600,000 untuk kerja-kerja robohkan bangunan haram ini.

Banyak cantik Tuan-Tuan. Sekarang kita pula kena bayar (DANA AWAM atau TAXPAYERS MONEY)  RM600,000 untuk robohkan bangunan haram. Siapa dapat kontrak RM600,000 roboh bangunan? Dulu masa bangunan haram naik, mesti ada geng tutup mata sebelah. Mesti ada geng yang dapat untung. 

Bila projek depa sudah bau t_ _k kita pula kena bayar RM600,000 untuk roboh kerja bodoh mereka. Bila untung depa yang sikit enjoy. Bila jadi masalah kita semua kena tanggung. Banyak cantik.

Ketirisan, rasuah, kebodohan, tak ada akal. penipu, pembohong, penyamun mereka-lah yang bermaharajalela. Mereka-lah telan duit kita dulu. 

Lihat gambar interview jawatan kosong di Melaka itu. Hampir semua yang beratur di tepi jalan itu anak Melayu. Yang menghancurkan masa depan mereka bangsa sendiri juga. Yang nak interview mereka beri peluang pekerjaan adalah syarikat German. 

The tragedy of Zaid Ibrahim





The tragedy of Zaid Ibrahim


There are politicians whose political journeys become so crowded with reinventions that one begins to wonder whether there was ever a fixed destination to begin with.


Updated 10 hours ago
Published on 15 Jun 2026 8:16AM


For years, Zaid positioned himself as the thinking man’s politician. - June 15, 2026



by Vinod Sekhar




There are politicians who evolve.

There are politicians who learn.

There are politicians who change their minds because the world changes around them.

And then there are politicians whose political journeys become so crowded with reinventions that one begins to wonder whether there was ever a fixed destination to begin with.

Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has now joined PAS.

Let that sink in for a moment.

This is the same Zaid who built a national reputation as a moderate. The same Zaid who cultivated the image of a liberal constitutionalist.

The same Zaid who spoke eloquently about pluralism, moderation, civil liberties and the need for Malaysia to reject extremism.

The same Zaid who was often presented to Malaysia’s urban intellectual class as proof that reason and moderation still had a place in our politics.

Today, he is in PAS.

Not merely cooperating with PAS.

Not merely finding common ground with PAS.

A member of PAS.

A party whose senior leaders have, over the years, made statements that many non-Muslims and many moderate Muslims have viewed as exclusionary.

A party that continues to advocate for Hudud. A party whose vision of Malaysia has frequently raised concerns among those who believe our constitutional settlement was intended to protect a multicultural and multi-religious nation.

The obvious question is not whether PAS has the right to recruit him.

The obvious question is: what happened to all those principles?

For years, Zaid positioned himself as the thinking man’s politician. He was with UMNO when UMNO offered relevance.

Then, PKR, when reformasi offered relevance. Then KITA, when leadership offered relevance.

Then DAP, when the opposition wave offered relevance. Then back to UMNO when UMNO once again appeared useful. And now PAS.

At some point, the public is entitled to ask a simple question.

What exactly is the ideology here?

Because if every political destination becomes acceptable, then perhaps the destination was never the point.

Perhaps the journey itself was.

More specifically, perhaps remaining politically significant was.

I am often told that we should not question people’s motives.

Normally, I agree.

But politics is ultimately about trust.

And trust is built on consistency.

If a football manager changed clubs every season, supporters would ask questions.

If a politician changes ideological homes repeatedly, voters have every right to ask questions.

The defenders will say that Zaid is independent-minded.

Perhaps.

The defenders will say he follows his conscience.

Perhaps.

The defenders will say he is searching for the best vehicle to serve Malaysia.

Perhaps.

But eventually “perhaps” stops being enough.

Because every move creates a new contradiction.

When he joined DAP, he praised DAP’s progressive credentials.

When he returned to UMNO, he spoke of reforming UMNO from within.




Now he joins PAS.

Was DAP wrong?

Was UMNO wrong?

Or is PAS suddenly right?

They cannot all be true at the same time.

The deeper concern is not about Zaid himself.

Malaysia has survived bigger political disappointments than one man’s latest membership card.

The concern is what this says about our political culture.

We increasingly reward personalities over principles.

We celebrate clever commentary more than consistent conviction.

We mistake eloquence for courage.

And we confuse visibility with leadership.

Real leadership is not about finding the next stage from which to speak.

It is about standing where you are when it becomes difficult.

The people I admire most in life are not those who were always popular.

They are those who remained faithful to their principles even when it cost them influence, access, money or status.


Consistency is expensive

That is why it is so rare. As for Zaid Ibrahim, perhaps he genuinely believes PAS is now the best platform for Malaysia.

If so, he owes Malaysians a full explanation.

Not a slogan.

Not a press statement.

Not political poetry.

A real explanation.

What changed?

What did PAS change?

What did he change?

And what exactly was he offered that convinced him this latest political migration was necessary?

Until those questions are answered, many Malaysians will inevitably reach their own conclusion.

That this was never really about ideology.

It was about relevance.

And relevance, unlike principles, is always searching for a new home. - June 15, 2026



Datuk Dr Vinod Sekhar is the publisher of The Vibes and Chairman of the Petra Group


***


Zaid was a hero when he resigned on principles as Law Minister from the AAB cabinet because of ISA being applied on Teresa Kok, RPK and a Chinese media journalist. That's why I like him.

He joined PKR but was flabbergasted by the politics within - thanks to Ass-binte. He left out of disgust, as was I.

When he joined DAP, alas, the party bigwigs 'cold-shouldered' him, so what could he do but to leave once again - I understood his frustration at his 'no role' membership.

Thereafter he was a broken man, wandering into all sorts of yucky 'company'.

Poor Zaid - I still like him.