Thursday, February 05, 2026

U.S.-Iran War: Why India Could Be Worst Hit If Trump Strikes Tehran & Strait of Hormuz Closes?


Thursday, February 5, 2026


U.S.-Iran War: Why India Could Be Worst Hit If Trump Strikes Tehran & Strait of Hormuz Closes? OPED


By MJ Augustine Vinod
-February 5, 2026



Tensions are brewing between the US and Iran. Yesterday, a US F-35-C jet shot down an Iranian drone heading towards USS Abraham Lincoln. If a war breaks out, Tehran is likely to block the Strait of Hormuz, which could adversely affect India and China.

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow maritime passage between Iran and Oman. It is one of the most strategic global energy pressure points, and any disruption here will adversely impact Asia, Europe, and beyond.

At its narrowest point, it is only 33 km wide. The navigable lane is not more than 10 km, with about 3 km of passage for outbound traffic and 3 km for inbound traffic.

The northern side of the strait is controlled by Iran, which has hilly terrain. From these hills, Iran can effectively monitor traffic flowing through the strait using radar. It can also deploy air defence and surface-to-surface weapons on these mountains to control who enters or exits the strait.
Geographic & Strategic Overview of the Strait of Hormuz

The geographic importance of this strait cannot be overemphasized, as global shipping lanes are completely dependent on it.

The southern part of Hormuz belongs to Oman, and the Musandam Peninsula juts into the strait, narrowing the passage even further. Very large naval ships cannot manoeuvre effectively in the strait because of the shallow depth. This limits naval vessels’ ability to carry out tactical actions, thereby restricting their options as they enter this choke point.

This geography favors asymmetric warfare. A smaller power does not need naval superiority to cause disruption; it only needs to create uncertainty.

Why the Strait of Hormuz Is So Important?

This is the world’s most important strategic energy chokepoint in human history.

The average daily energy flow through this strait, in terms of crude oil and condensate, is about 21 million barrels, which is roughly 20% of global consumption.

When it comes to LNG, about 90 million tonnes move annually, accounting for nearly 25% of global trade. Apart from these, refined petroleum products also move in large quantities through Hormuz every day.

To put this in perspective, one in every five barrels of fuel consumed in the world passes through this strait.
Why Pipelines Cannot Fully Replace the Strait

Saudi Arabia’s East–West pipeline carries oil to the Red Sea, but it is not sufficient to replace full Gulf exports.

The UAE’s Fujairah pipeline bypasses Hormuz, but it serves only a fraction of UAE exports. Kuwait and Qatar remain completely dependent on this strait.

Simply put, pipelines can offset the strategic importance of Hormuz to some extent, but they cannot completely replace it, at least not in the near future.
Nations that Depend on the Strait of Hormuz

Let us look at how oil-exporting countries of the Gulf would be affected.


Saudi Arabia exports millions of barrels per day, and oil revenue funds infrastructure, development, social spending, Vision 2030 reforms, as well as government salaries. Any disruption in oil flow outside the country will severely affect these sectors.


Iraq relies on oil for over 90% of its government revenue and social spending. Nearly 100% of Iraq’s exports depend on the Strait of Hormuz.

Qatar is the world’s largest liquefied natural gas exporter. It’s gas heats homes, powers factories, and generates electricity across Asia and Europe. Any disruption to Qatar’s gas exports will have a serious impact on the ground.


Strait of Hormuz


Major Energy Importers

India


India is one of the most exposed countries when it comes to any disruption of oil trade through this region. . India imports about 80–90% of its fossil fuels, including crude oil, and over 50% of its natural gas requirements from the Middle East.

Middle Eastern supply dominates due to proximity and compatibility with refining. Even a $10 increase in crude prices significantly worsens India’s trade deficit.

China

China is the world’s largest consumer of crude oil. Nearly 50% of its crude flows through this region. China does maintain strategic reserves, but these are not infinite. The Chinese economy, its stability, and the well-being of its people are heavily dependent on uninterrupted oil imports.

Japan and South Korea


Japan and South Korea have no domestic oil or gas production. Both of them are completely dependent on Middle Eastern energy supplies.

They hold large strategic reserves of around 120 days; however, these reserves are designed for emergencies, not prolonged crises.


How Energy Dependence Translates into Economic Vulnerability

Oil’s Role Beyond Transport

Oil drives nations. Diesel-powered agricultural pumps and tractors depend entirely on fuel. Any price fluctuation has a cascading effect on agricultural output, which directly impacts the common man. It also affects foreign reserves and inflation.

Aviation fuel plays a major role in transporting people and goods. Any increase raises ticket prices and fuels inflation.

India’s Inflation Sensitivity

India’s inflation sensitivity to increases in crude prices cannot be overstated. Food inflation, driven by higher transportation costs, directly affects the Indian government’s budgets and subsidies.

Household spending power declines sharply as oil prices rise. Historically, crude price shocks in India have weakened the rupee, forced tax adjustments, and widened fiscal deficits, severely impacting the country’s annual budgets.


Image for Representation


Military Reality: Why the Strait Is Hard to Secure

Militarily, Iran enjoys substantial asymmetric capabilities.

It can render warships and even aircraft carriers ineffective through fast-attack boats, anti-ship missiles, and mining the region. This could prevent American vessels from entering or exiting Hormuz.

There are also intelligence reports suggesting Iran has developed submarine-launched anti-ship missiles in addition to torpedoes, with ranges sufficient to sink very large crude carriers. All of this gives Iran a tremendous asymmetric advantage.

VLCCs as Strategic Targets

VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) is an ideal tool for disruption. It is over 300 meters long and must move slowly in confined, shallow waters like Hormuz.

It can carry up to 2 million barrels of crude. An attack could spill oil, contaminate the region, and make it unusable for months.

Such a catastrophe is something neither America nor the world is prepared to accept. In many ways, this would be worse than a nuclear attack.


Scenario Analysis: If One or Two VLCCs Are Sunk or Disabled

Physical Disruption

A single disabled VLCC in the narrow lane can obstruct traffic in both directions.

As discussed earlier, the navigable width is only about 10 km. This would force ships to reroute, sometimes taking weeks or months to reach their destinations. Ships west of the strait could remain tangled, unable to exit Hormuz.

Salvage operations would be extremely slow due to the risks of oil spills and explosive hazards. The narrow corridor further complicates salvage efforts.

Insurance and Commercial Reaction

The shipping industry is entirely dependent on insurance. As risk rises, insurance premiums spike sharply, and insurers may even withdraw coverage from the region. Ship owners would then refuse to enter the area, as operating without insurance would be commercially unviable. Even without a formal blockade, shipping would be severely affected.

Immediate Impact on Global Oil Markets

A spike of up to 50% in global fuel prices is a realistic scenario. Panic buying by nations and consumers cannot be ruled out. Stock markets would plunge, especially in countries fully dependent on imported energy.


Specific Impact on India

Fuel Prices and Public Pressure

An increase in crude prices would directly translate into higher petrol and diesel prices. This would provide ammunition to opposition parties and intensify political pressure on the ruling government to cut taxes, thereby increasing subsidy burdens. In extreme cases, such pressures could even lead to the fall of a government.

Since India does not hold large strategic reserves, the impact would be immediate and severe.

External Sector Stress


Higher oil prices would increase import bills, weaken the rupee, and place heavy pressure on foreign exchange reserves. The RBI would struggle to manage inflation, and in extreme cases, India could slip into recession. This could lead to law-and-order issues and even malnutrition, reminiscent of conditions during the Second World War.

Strategic Reserves: A Temporary Buffer

India’s reserves cover only a few weeks of consumption. While higher prices may slightly reduce demand, the reduction would not be sufficient to withstand prolonged disruption.

Indian Railways would also be affected, affecting rural India’s access to food, medicine, and essential supplies.

Would Iran Take Such a Risk?

Whether Iran would take such a risk is a question no one can answer definitively. It may resort to such drastic measures if pushed to the wall by the US or Israel.

The current Iranian regime has demonstrated its resolve, allegedly even executing its own citizens to stay in power. Given this level of resolve, such actions cannot be ruled out and must be factored into any military planning involving Iran.


Can the Strait be Secured?

Naval Presence

International intervention appears to be the only viable solution. The United Nations has repeatedly demonstrated its inability to control such situations and has long been perceived as a toothless tiger.

Countries dependent on fossil fuels are gradually expanding mitigation strategies through renewable energy, increasing strategic reserves, and seeking alternative pipelines. India, for instance, is looking toward Russia for energy. These measures will take time to yield results. Until then, the Strait of Hormuz remains a major fault line.

Conclusion


The Strait of Hormuz is critically important because the global economy depends on the energy that flows through it. It is extremely fragile, both geographically and politically.

For India and other Asian countries that are heavily dependent on imported energy, there is little control over the actions of the US, Israel, or Iran.

Iran holds significant leverage due to its strategic advantage. If pushed to the wall, it may take drastic action—one that could trigger consequences potentially worse than a nuclear winter.



Group Captain MJ Augustine Vinod (Retd), VSM, is a former Mirage 2000 fighter pilot, air accident investigator, and co-founder of AMOS Aerospace. He writes on emerging defense technologies, AI in warfare, and India’s aviation future.


Secretary of NGO that collected donations for Gaza nabbed


FMT:

Secretary of NGO that collected donations for Gaza nabbed

An MACC source says the suspect allegedly misappropriated RM4.2 million in funds belonging to the organisation


The suspect being hauled to the Putrajaya magistrates’ court for his remand hearing. (MACC pic)



PETALING JAYA: The secretary of an NGO has been arrested by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission for allegedly abusing his power by misappropriating RM4.2 million in funds belonging to the organisation.

An MACC source said the organisation had collected donations for humanitarian missions to Gaza, Palestine, while the suspect, who owns a food company, is alleged to have committed the offences between 2022 and 2024.

“The suspect is believed to have approved and transferred RM4.2 million in the NGO’s funds to the accounts of two other companies for the purpose of investments.

“It is believed that the individuals in the organisation’s management had interests in the two companies,” said the source.

The suspect, who is in his 40s, was arrested around 6pm yesterday while giving his statement at the MACC headquarters. He has since been remanded until Feb 7.

MACC anti-money laundering division director Norhaizam Muhammad confirmed the arrest.


***


Pilfering money meant for GAZA relief - what an S-Whole


Heavy vehicles prohibited on Malaysian roads Feb 14-15 and Feb 21-22, says JPJ





Heavy vehicles prohibited on Malaysian roads Feb 14-15 and Feb 21-22, says JPJ



A lorry drives along the Federal Highway on January 2, 2025. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

Thursday, 05 Feb 2026 8:34 PM MYT


PUTRAJAYA, Feb 5 — Goods transport vehicles are prohibited from being on the roads for four days in conjunction with the Chinese New Year celebrations, to ensure smoother traffic flow and reduce the risk of crashes during the festive season.

Road Transport Department (JPJ) director-general Datuk Aedy Fadly Ramli said the ban would be enforced two days before the festival, on Feb 14 and 15, as well as on Feb 21 and 22.

“All operators and drivers of the affected vehicles are advised to comply with this directive.

“Meanwhile, road users are also advised to always comply with traffic rules, ensure their vehicles are in safe condition, and plan their journeys properly throughout the festive season,” he said in a statement today.

Aedy Fadly said any complaints related to traffic offences could be channelled via the MyJPJ application through e-Aduan@JPJ or email aduantrafik@jpj.gov.my.

Through an attachment provided by JPJ, it showed that there were three categories of goods vehicles involved in the enforcement of the ban from being on the roads throughout the festive season.

For category one, the ban is enforced at all times on the specified dates.


The vehicles involved in the category are heavy haulage lorries and tipper lorries with a laden weight exceeding 7,500 kilogrammes, low-loader lorries, pole trailers, flatbed trailers, log lorries, wheeled heavy machinery (except wheeled heavy machinery, tow trucks and tractors used for emergency and rescue operations); as well as tractors.

Lorries transporting cement, steel, stones, sand, soil, other construction materials, tin tailings, tin ore, quarry products and other minerals are also included under category one.

For category two, the ban is from 8 pm to 8 am throughout the period the ban is in force.

Vehicles under category two include container lorries transporting goods, except container lorries transporting goods from ports or airports to industrial areas within the same state and vice versa.

This also covers cargo lorries transporting electronic or electrical goods or industrial chemical materials from ports or airports to industrial areas within the same state and vice versa.

Lorries transporting fresh oil palm fruit bunches, crude palm oil products, scrap rubber and latex, as well as empty cargo lorries, are also among the vehicles under category two.

For category three, namely mobile cranes and concrete mixer lorries, the ban is enforced from 6 pm to 6 am throughout the ban period, and is subject to a distance of 25 kilometres from the base to the construction site as well as the permitted operating hours on specific roads.

According to JPJ, wheeled heavy machinery and mobile cranes are exempted when carrying out emergency works.

“Any goods vehicles or types of goods not stated in the attachment or schedule are allowed to use the roads during the ban period. — Bernama

Thai election now just 3 days out


Murray Hunter


Thai election now just 3 days out



Feb 05, 2026





When the Thai election was called mid-December, the writer predicted that the Thai-Cambodia conflict would favour the conservative side of politics, especially prime minister Anutin Charnvirakul’s Bhumjaithai Party. However, with 32.0 percent of undecided voters at the time, anything could happen.

The latest National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) Poll taken January 23-27 with 2,500 respondents representing all regions of Thailand, national political party support was 34.20 percent for the People’s Party, 22.60 percent for the Bhumjaithai Party, 16.20 percent for the Pheu Thai Party, and 13.20 percent for the Democrat Party. A number of small parties like the Economic Party, Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party, and Kla Tham Party received far less support but this support may be in concentrated areas. An important finding was that only 2.60 percent of voters remain undecided.

Given that the various parties have differing support across the various regions, individual candidate support will be a major factor, especially in tight races. The results on Sunday night are uncertain.

Its highly likely that the People’s Party will win the most number of seats, just like Move Forward did in 2023. However, almost certain not to be enough for them to govern in their own right in the 500-member assembly. Pheu Thai looks to be struggling with the Shinawatra factor gone. Yodchanan Wongsawat just doesn’t have the same pull. The Bhumjaithai Party doesn’t look to be benefitting from the Thatcher factor as much as it expected, leaving it short.

Any new government will most likely be a negotiated-coalition and it will depend upon how pragmatic the People’s Party is for it to play any part of the government. Anutin with Pheu Thai support could be returned as prime minister, unless the Democrat Party plays a spoiler role. However, based upon past performance the Democrats would firmly align with the conservative side of politics. As has been seen, after 2023, anything could happen post-election, such as Pheu Thai abandoning its ties to the conservative block.

There could be some electoral surprise coming NIDA didn’t pick up. For example, how betrayed do Pheu Thai voters feel? How did voters feel with Anutin as prime minister? He played a lay back non-controversial role during the election, unlike previous leaders like Prayut Chan o-cha. Some commentators see this election as a great test for Thai nationalism. How far have the Democrats been rehabilitated by the electorate is another question The Novermber floods in the south may play a major role.

The low profile of the referendum during the election doesn’t point to any spirit of desire for radical change by voters. There seems to be some acceptance of the accommodation between the conservative elite and pragmatists. Just how the People’s Party will disturb this remains to be seen on Sunday. There was a lot of pushbacks from People’s Party voters when a grand coalition with Bhumjaithai was suggested.

There are two aspects to Sunday’s election, national support verses local voter sentiments. The party lists are always important, but ‘twisted’ single electorate results can distort national tallies.

Over that last days Bhumjaithai is stressing that it is the only party which can deal with Cambodia, Move Forwards Pita Limjaroenrat is out on the hustings for the People’s Party talking about a true peoples’ government and Democrat leader and former prime minister Abhisit Vejjajiva is pushing his party as a safe option.

Sunday night could return Thailand back to the future with a conservative-pragmatist alliance or throw the dice for something progressive. The first option is most likely blending in with a cabinet of technocrats to run the next government.



From Wankee to Ozzie - Re AUKUS - Thanks for your hundreds of billions, but Frigg Off



Guardian:

US congressional report explores option of not delivering any Aukus nuclear submarines to Australia


Report offers alternative of the US navy retaining boats and operating them out of Australian bases

Ben Doherty
Thu 5 Feb 2026 08.10 AEDT



From Wankee to Ozzie - Re AUKUS


A new United States congressional report openly contemplates not selling any nuclear submarines to Australia – as promised under the Aukus agreement – because America wants to retain control of the submarines for a potential conflict with China over Taiwan.

The report by the US Congressional Research Service, Congress’s policy research arm, posits an alternative “military division of labour” under which the submarines earmarked for sale to Australia are instead retained under US command to be sailed out of Australian bases.


One of the arguments made against the US selling submarines to Australia is that Australia has refused to commit to supporting America in a conflict with China over Taiwan. Boats under US command could be deployed into that conflict.


Australia’s confidence in Trump’s US has evaporated. What will it take for the alliance to rupture?


The report, released on 26 January, cites statements from the Australian defence minister, Richard Marles, and the chief of navy that Australia would make “no promises … that Australia would support the United States” in the event of war with China over Taiwan.


“Selling three to five Virginia-class SSNs [nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines] to Australia would thus convert those SSNs from boats that would be available for use in a US-China crisis or conflict into boats that might not be available for use in a US-China crisis or conflict,” the report argues.

“This could weaken rather than strengthen deterrence and warfighting capability in connection with a US-China crisis or conflict.”

Under the existing Aukus “optimal pathway’, Australia will first buy between three and five Virginia-class nuclear-powered conventionally armed submarines, the first in 2032.


Following that, the first of eight Australian-built Aukus submarines, based on a UK design, is slated to be in the water “in the early 2040s”.

But the Congressional Research report describes an alternative “military division of labour”, under which the US would not sell any Virginia-class submarines to Australia.

The boats not sold to Australia “would instead be retained in US Navy service and operated out of Australia” alongside US and UK attack submarines already planned to rotate through Australian bases.

The report speculated Australia could use the money saved to invest on other defence capabilities, even using those capabilities as a subordinate force in support of US missions.

“Australia, instead of using funds to purchase, build, operate, and maintain its own SSNs, would instead invest those funds in other military capabilities – such as … long-range anti-ship missiles, drones, loitering munitions, B-21 long-range bombers … or systems for defending Australia against attack … so as to create an Australian capacity for performing other missions, including non-SSN military missions for both Australia and the United States.”

The report also raises cybersecurity concerns, noting that “hackers linked to China” are “highly active” in attempting to penetrate Australian government and contractors’ computers.


It argues that sharing nuclear submarine technology with another country “would increase the attack surface, meaning the number of potential digital and physical entry points that China, Russia, or some other country could attempt to penetrate to gain access to that technology”.

The debate over whether the US should sell boats to Australia is also grounded in ongoing concern over low rates of shipbuilding in the US: the country’s shipyards are failing to build enough submarines to supply America’s own navy, let alone build boats for Australia.

For the past 15 years, the US Navy has ordered boats at a rate of two a year, but its shipyards have never met that build rate “and since 2022 has been limited to about 1.1 to 1.2 boats per year, resulting in a growing backlog of boats procured but not yet built”.

The US fleet currently has only three-quarters of the submarines it needs (49 boats of a force-level goal of 66). Shipyards need to build Virginia-class submarines at a rate of two a year to meet America’s own needs, and to lift that to 2.33 boats a year in order to be able to supply submarines to Australia.

Legislation passed by the US Congress prohibits the sale of any submarine to Australia if the US needs it for its own fleet. The US commander-in-chief – the president of the day – must certify that America relinquishing a submarine “will not degrade the United States undersea capabilities”.


What is Aukus pillar one?





Pillar one of the Australia-UK-US (Aukus) agreement involves Australia being given the technology to command its own fleet of conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines. There are two stages:

• First, Australia will buy between three and five Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines from the US, the first of these in 2032. But before any boat can be sold to Australia, the US commander-in-chief – the president of the day – must certify that the US relinquishing a submarine will not diminish its navy’s undersea capability. The US submarine fleet now has only three-quarters of the submarines it needs (49 boats of a force-level goal of 66). And there are significant concerns the US cannot build enough submarines for its own needs, let alone any for Australia.

• Second, by the “late 2030s”, according to the "optimal pathway" outlined in Australia’s submarine industry strategy, the UK will launch the first specifically designed and built Aukus submarine for Britain’s Royal Navy.

The first Australian-built Aukus submarine, for the Royal Australian Navy, will be in the water “in the early 2040s”. Australia will build up to eight Aukus boats, with the final vessels launched in the 2060s.

Each of Australia’s nuclear submarines is forecast to have a working life of about three decades. Australia will be responsible for securing and storing the nuclear waste from its submarines - including high-level nuclear waste and spent fuel (a weapons proliferation risk) - for thousands of years.

Aukus is forecast to cost Australia up to A$368bn to the mid-2050s.

The report argues that Australia’s strict nuclear non-proliferation laws could also weaken US submarine force projection under the current Aukus plan.

Australian officials have consistently told US counterparts that, in adherence to Australia’s commitments as a non-nuclear weapon state under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Australia’s attack submarines can only ever be armed with conventional weapons.

“Selling three to five Virginia-class SSNs to Australia would thus convert those SSNs from boats that could in the future be armed with the US nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile with an aim of enhancing deterrence,” the report states.

The report – authored by Ronald O’Rourke, an analyst for naval affairs in the Congressional Research Service for more than four decades – also makes the case for retaining the current Aukus arrangement.

It argues that selling Virginia-class boats would send “a strong signal to China of the collective determination of the United States and Australia, along with the UK, to counter China’s military modernisation effort”.

“The fact that the United States has never before sold a complete SSN to another country – not even the UK – would underscore the depth of this determination, and thus the strength of the deterrent signal it would send.”

It was also argued that selling nuclear-powered submarines would accelerate the establishment of an Australian submarine fleet “and thereby present China much sooner with a second allied decision-making centre – along with the United States – for attack submarine operations in the Indo-Pacific.

“This would enhance deterrence of potential Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific by complicating Chinese military planning.”

The report says selling Virginia-class boats to Australia would be comparable to assistance the US gave to the UK and France in the 20th century in establishing their nuclear submarine fleets and nuclear weapon arsenals.

Previous Congressional Research Service reports have flagged the possibility of no submarines being available to sell to Australia, but Australia has previously rejected contemplation of any “division of labour” in lieu of acquiring submarines.

The Guardian has approached Australia’s defence minister, Richard Marles, for comment.


Anger among Labour MPs grows over Starmer's handling of Mandelson-Epstein scandal



Thanks MF:



BBC:

Anger among Labour MPs grows over Starmer's handling of Mandelson-Epstein scandal




Summary


Anger is growing among Keir Starmer's own Labour MPs over his handling of the Peter Mandelson scandal


It comes after the prime minister told Parliament he was aware of the former business secretary's ongoing friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein when he appointed him as US ambassador


Starmer said he was misled about the "sheer depth and extent" of Mandelson's relationship with Epstein


Asked on BBC Newsnight if the prime minister should step down, Labour MP Barry Gardiner said: "I think he needs to think very hard about what is in the country's best interest"


MP Rebecca Long-Bailey said Starmer's decision to appoint Mandelson was a "catastrophic misjudgement"


After pressure from the Conservatives and some Labour MPs, Starmer said the government would release all material relating to Mandelson's 2024 appointment - barring national security and "international relations" exemptions


There is a sense of fury across the Labour Party, with the latest events leaving the PM's authority severely weakened, writes our correspondent Harry Farley


Mandelson has not responded to requests for comment - the BBC understands his position is that he has not acted in any way criminally and that he was not motivated by financial gain


An elected KL Mayor drives xenophobic politicians insane





An elected KL Mayor drives xenophobic politicians insane



Thursday, 05 Feb 2026 9:53 AM MYT
By Praba Ganesan


FEB 5 – The ringgit rises and Malaysians are eager to travel to flaunt relative affluence.

Here’s a question, do not salivate, do not pack the bags yet, who runs these desired destinations? Whether by flight, oceanic voyage or bus, are these cities governed through local elections or not?

Bangkok, Jakarta, Manila, Cebu, Chiangmai, Delhi, Lahore, Tokyo, London, Paris or New York?

Have a good think before answering. Rattle the head sideways, tell you what, screw columnists and their tricky questions, use AI; Gemini, ChatGPT or perhaps Claude?


They are. Run through elections.


But surely there are exceptions, nations with sanity who do not madly, unthinkingly rush into becoming freely elected cities.

That would be cities in one-party nations of China, Vietnam and North Korea, for Beijing, Shanghai, Hanoi or Pyongyang.


But we hate communists, absolutely abhor them. Umno politicians have built their whole careers spewing their hatred for commies and their commie ways which threaten to humiliate, decimate and annihilate our sacred ways.

There is nothing worse than adopting a communist mindset. It is the number one objective for the true Malay nationalist patriot, to keep Malaysia communist free.

We won’t trust those city elections by commies with only party approved candidates. Damn communists!

That leaves us with Singapore and Brunei. Only one is a travel destination, and not an aspirational destination for Umno leaders.

So, who to follow when deciding on local elections? Because every sane city in the world elects its leadership, with different styles and methods, but the bottom line, elect. Not appoint, elect.

A slew of Malay nationalists here oppose elections in a zeal akin to assuming Kuala Lumpur residents deciding their city management means killing the soul of Kuala Lumpur.

What a very weird way of looking at representative government. In their minds, they have to protect Kuala Lumpur residents from their own foolishness.

But they are completely convinced that all the cities named above are competently run, actually wonderfully run, that they would like to visit them.

That they let their children study in them, safe and reassured their children are not in elected asylums.

It’s the who, not the what

Umno, PAS, Bersatu politicians are not opposed to elections, because their parties hold elections, and they are elected at the state and federal levels.

The study by International Islamic University is commissioned to independently validate what a world already knows.

They are not about to crack the code. It’s political cover for DAP, so that an election in Kuala Lumpur has academic backing, not just the backing of political parties.

Which is why Malay nationalists urge studies into the split public schools system, meaning the existence of Chinese vernacular schools and the UEC examination system.

You dare question appointed mayors, we will question Chinese schools and UEC!

This country is so stuck in 1950s trepidations and haunted by ghosts of the past that what we desperately need is group therapy rather than academic research.

The real opposition is not to elections but the ethnic compositions of city leaderships at the end of elections.

It is the spectre of a Chinese mayor for Kuala Lumpur. Which is Armageddon minus the pyrotechnics for them. Inconceivable, impossible and indecent.

They feel Kuala Lumpur residents, even if the majority of them are Malays, are going to vote for a Chinese.

That’s it, that’s what we are really talking about. All the smokescreens and euphemisms are reduced to the fear of the yellow wave.

As long as Putrajaya appoints the KL mayor, he or she will not be ethnic Chinese.



Kuala Lumpur voters are capable of electing the worst kind of mayor, just as Putrajaya is likely to continue appointing mayors few Kuala Lumpur residents know. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa



KL the new Gotham City

Former MP Puad Zarkashi fears cartels and gangsters will run Malaysian cities if there were free city elections.

Somehow, if civil servants are appointed and hold no direct accountability to Kuala Lumpur residents but to the politicians who appointed them, they will be eminently capable and corruption free.

Corruption happens when things happen in the dark and are done unquestioningly. Corruption in governance directly correlates to transparency, auditing discipline and judiciary oversight.

People do not steal less because they are good people with great values, people do not steal if the likelihood of them being caught is extremely high.

Elections keep those in power in check. Which is why the first six prime ministers diligently warded off fair elections and administered through the bloated institutional corruption being fought today.

The path to reform was the ending of BN monopoly of power in 2008, and BN’s fall from power in 2018.

Private sector corruptors hate elections because they bring uncertainties. They prefer a fixed power structure they can appease to garner privileges.

Better buy out the same guy in power for decades rather than needing to try to buy out all the guys in position to win power.

Worse, forced to witness each proceeding winner highlight the corruption by previous administrations, dragging the private sector corruptors along in their fall.

This city of floods, empty buildings and dirty night markets

As a grandchild of Kuala City Hall garbage collectors and market cleaners, let me weigh in.

Nothing like local knowledge, eh?

They wake up early to be out serving the city, for decades. They are dead now.

Kuala Lumpur voters are capable of electing the worst kind of mayor, just as Putrajaya is likely to continue appointing mayors few Kuala Lumpur residents know.

An elected mayor has a more direct relationship with the electorate. This is not an earth-shattering reveal, this is just the normal thing that happens in normal democracies.

Why fight the world on this?

Why are so many people who do not suffer the city traffic, never rue the long waits for transit buses after their train rides, never cringe when it rains in case their car floats in a parking lot or dinner is under a bridge, want to tell KL what it needs?

Why are so many adamant KL has to avoid modernity in order to preserve imaginary race symbols?

Why disallow Kuala Lumpur folks the right to argue among themselves about what is best for them rather than allow prime ministers from different corners of the federation determine their leadership?

Maybe these politicians won’t answer while they are in team-mode inside Malaysia.

Maybe when they travel out of the country, to any of the thousands of elected cities from Ankara to Wellington, they can look out of their hotel windows and realise the cities have not burnt themselves to the ground.

This does not have to go on in perpetuity because opponents have in them the ability to play out fears in regular Malaysians.

Stop being alarmists. Start being humans who appreciate democracy.

JEFF BEZOS WAS RIGHT to sack a large number of Washington Post staff last night

 Nury Vittachi

JEFF BEZOS WAS RIGHT to sack a large number of Washington Post staff last night, I’m sorry to say.
The paper yesterday booted out more than 300 staff in a mass culling of jobs.
Now before I am torn to shreds by my counterparts in the profession, let me add that I offer deep sympathy, on a personal level, for every individual who lost their jobs. I mean that. It’s a tough industry (I’ve been sacked from news outlets several times) and it always hurts to be shown the door.
.
REDUCTIVE AND SHALLOW
But something else MUST be said specifically about the people in the section of Washington Post coverage that I am familiar with—the ones who produce reductive, hostile, nuance-free coverage of mainland China and Hong Kong. Their work has been extremely harmful to all sides, and it is very, very good thing for everyone that it may be over.
The sackings of these people give the world a chance to rise above the shallow anti-China narrative that has been used to trigger an arms race, and instead move towards a world characterized by healthy geopolitical relationships based on trade and mutual respect: in other words, peace and understanding.
You want evidence? I have evidence. Look at the coverage for yourself.
.
'TENTACLE WRITING'
For example, China correspondent Katrina Northrop was sacked by the Washington Post yesterday.
For the readers of the Washington Post, she took the huge, complex, richly cultured, beautifully complex Chinese nation, and reduced it to a malevolent force in Beijing that could do nothing except reach out, tighten its grip, and create crackdowns on everything.
- Her story on finance: “What does Beijing’s tightening grip over Hong Kong mean for the world’s most valuable stock exchange?”
- Her story on the tragic Hong Kong tower blocks fire: “First came the fire. Then came the political crackdown.”
- Her story on the Chinese beauty industry: “Amid Botched procedures, Beijing is cracking down on cosmetic surgery”.
- Her story on politics in Taiwan: “On today’s Washington Post front page, our investigation into the murky mix of organized crime and politics allowing Beijing to extend its reach into Taiwan.”
- Her story on China’s amazing rise in AI: “How China is Using AI to Extend Censorship and Surveillance”.
Get the message? Everything is in the language of tentacles – Beijing reaching out, gripping, tightening, cracking down.
But let’s not be unfair to Ms Northrop, who may be a very nice person, and who writes very well. She was simply following the over-arching “west-good-China-bad” narrative of her industry, like her colleagues.
.
AN AGGRESSIVE HOTEL?
Also sacked was Mike E Miller. In August last year, Miller lead-wrote an article in the Washington Post that reported that both China and the US were spending money on the island of Palau.
But he notably failed to highlight the fact that they were not doing the same thing at all. Chinese people were building a hotel to boost Palau’s tourism industry and employ locals. The US was building special harbors for warships for America’s planned war on China.
Incredibly, Miller’s article painted the Chinese as the aggressive ones! “China, which has the world’s largest navy, has been aggressively increasing its influence across the South China Sea and into the Western Pacific, seeking to becoming the predominant maritime power in a region the U.S. has long considered its domain,” he wrote.
How is a hotel designed to employ locals worse than a warship base? The Chinese-built tourist hotel, Mr Miller wrote, may be used to look at the US war preparations, he explained.
The cringeworthy level of bias was so transparent that a child could see through it. But he may be a nice person, just following orders.
.
FALSE VISION OF HONG KONG
Also sacked was Shibani Mahtani, who wrote wildly negative articles about Hong Kong. Residents of the city know that their home is one of the richest, safest places in the world, and literally the healthiest city on earth, with a longevity level that beats Japan.
But in her hands, it came across as a nightmarish place where awful things happened to the innocent.
To take just one example, Jimmy Lai was kept in solitary confinement, she told the world, omitting the rather crucial fact that he requested it.
Her writing gave the impression that Lai’s trial was about free speech, as she chose to downplay the crucial fact that the heart of it was foreign collusion—and a huge amount of hard evidence of this was shown during the trial. I mean, Mike Pompeo’s office literally talked to Lai as the US passed laws and sanctions that did incredible harm to the innocent people of Hong Kong. Why not report that?
Lai printed a positive portrayal of the terrifying Dragon Slayers Brigade, who went on to gather terrorist-grade bombs and firearms to try to mass-murder innocent people in Wan Chai.
How do these things make Lai a hero, Ms Mahtani?
Again, she may be a nice person, just following orders. But I’m blessed with a large number of friends in Hong Kong, of all political leanings, and I don’t know a single one who is not horrified by the deeply unfair coverage of their city and their country by foreign correspondents working for the west against China.
.
SHORTAGE OF JOURNALISTS
As for the journalists out of a job in this region, I have a suggestion.
The world has a massive shortage of journalists who can rise above Tentacle Writing (“crackdown”, “grip”, “tightening hold” “Beijing's reach”) and write intelligently and even-handedly about East Asia, with insight and nuance and balance and fairness and honesty, even to the Chinese. I refer to people who can create bridges instead of walls.
Why not try being one of those? The world needs you.