Friday, September 18, 2026

Saudi Welcomes F-35 Fighter Jet Sale to the Kingdom. Will China Espionage Threat Sink the $24.3B Deal?





Saudi Welcomes F-35 Fighter Jet Sale to the Kingdom. Will China Espionage Threat Sink the $24.3B Deal?


By Sakshi Tiwari
-September 18, 2026



The US has approved a possible sale of F-35 Lightning II fighter jets and related equipment to Saudi Arabia. The State Department announced the determination on September 17, 2026. However, it is a proposed Foreign Military Sale (FMS), not a signed contract, and requires Congress’s approval.

The estimated cost is $24.3 billion. Saudi Arabia has requested 48 F-35 aircraft and 49 Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 engines, including one spare, along with communications gear, training, spare parts, and other support.

The State Department said the proposed sale “will support the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States by improving the security of a major non-NATO ally that is a force for political stability and economic progress in the Gulf region.”

It also said the sale “will improve Saudi Arabia’s capability to deter current and future threats by strengthening its homeland defense, and improving interoperability with U.S. forces, and other regional and NATO forces.”

“The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the military balance in the region,” the department said. Congress still has a review period before any final agreement can proceed.

The Saudi Embassy in Washington welcomed the proposed F-35 sale, calling it another step in US-Saudi defense ties.

In a post on X, the embassy said the package “reflects the strength and enduring nature of the Saudi-U.S. strategic partnership and the continued advancement of our defense cooperation.” It added that decades of security cooperation have “contributed to regional stability, strengthened our collective defense capabilities, and advanced our shared security interests.”


Roadblocks?

Earlier, Saudi Arabia had received approval from US President Donald Trump to acquire F-35s in November 2025 after Riyadh and Washington signed a “historic strategic defense agreement.”

Now, US intelligence analysts have raised concerns in internal assessments about possible Chinese espionage related to the nearly $24 billion sale of dozens of advanced F-35 warplanes to Saudi Arabia, the New York Times reported, citing sources.

Intelligence analysts fear China could obtain F-35 technology by conducting espionage operations inside Saudi Arabia or leveraging its existing military ties with the kingdom.

According to one official cited by the NYT report, a detailed assessment the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) produced several months ago examined Chinese military access to Saudi bases and the kingdom’s reliance on Chinese technology in its telecommunications networks. The same report raised doubts about whether the United States and Saudi Arabia can keep F-35-related sites adequately secure from China.

The DIA report in question has been shared across multiple administration agencies and congressional offices, along with evaluations from other intelligence organizations.

The US State Department forwarded a package covering 48 aircraft plus a spare engine to two congressional committees in June 2026, seeking preliminary clearance. However, several US lawmakers and their staff have since pressed the administration about the intelligence community’s reservations, the NYT report claimed.


Chinese Shadow Looms Over F-35?

The recent Pentagon intelligence report states that only Saudi and American officials and contractors should have access to locations where F-35s would be housed.

Pentagon officials are particularly worried about safeguarding the F-35’s cutting-edge radar and surveillance systems, according to the report.

Intelligence analysts have asked in the report whether Saudi Arabia would generally consent to restrict contact with Chinese military and intelligence officers and related organizations. The report also raises concerns about Saudi authorities’ willingness to remove equipment from defense sites, router infrastructure, and telecommunications from two well-known Chinese technology companies, Huawei and ZTE.


Israel’s F-35 Lightning II fighter jet takes part in an aerial display during a graduation ceremony of Israeli Air Force pilots at the Hatzerim base in the Negev desert, near the southern city of Beer Sheva, on June 23, 2022. (Photo by Menahem KAHANA / AFP)


The United States officially considers Huawei and ZTE to have deep ties to the Chinese government, the CPC (Communist Party of China), and the Chinese military.

In fact, these recent concerns echo earlier US objections that contributed to the collapse of a proposed F-35 sale to the United Arab Emirates.

Earlier, the US government had raised strong security concerns regarding the UAE’s use of Huawei 5G network equipment. Washington feared that Chinese technology could be used to spy on or compromise sensitive US military technology embedded in the stealth F-35 aircraft.

However, Emirati officials felt these stringent conditions and demands—which included requirements to remove or alter Chinese tech infrastructure—infringed on their national sovereignty and called off talks over the F-35 purchase.

On its part, Saudi Arabia has long cultivated ties with Chinese arms manufacturers despite being the world’s largest buyer of American weapons. It has obtained short-range ballistic missiles from China for years and, more recently, has signed agreements for sophisticated, extended-range versions that include technology transfers enabling local manufacturing and the construction of testing sites, as the EurAsian Times previously explained.

In fact, some reports suggested that the kingdom had used a Chinese-origin DF-15A short-range ballistic missile—whose purchase by Riyadh was previously unknown— against Houthi forces in Yemen.

In addition, the kingdom has purchased Wing Loong and CH-series drones and acquired PLZ-45 155mm self-propelled howitzers and the Norinco LG5 40mm anti-materiel grenade launcher. It has also purchased the Silent Hunter laser directed-energy weapon.

Meanwhile, a Reuters report in January 2026 claimed that Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are working out a deal that could convert roughly $2 billion in Saudi loans to Pakistan into the purchase of Sino-Pak JF-17 jets for the Royal Saudi Air Force. Pakistan authorities refuted these reports at the time, but the deepening Sino-Saudi defense ties have fueled persistent US unease about technology security.

Whether the latest intelligence assessment will become a roadblock as Congress prepares to decide whether to green-light the deal remains to be seen.

Earlier, former U.S. Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Stephen Bryen said, “Congress will need to evaluate the level of China’s penetration of Saudi Arabia’s defense industries, the safeguards that might be applicable to the F-35, and the impact of the sale of the F-35 on the regional power balance.”

Additionally, several analysts believe the US could do without risking its technology for close ties with Riyadh.

For instance, China expert Gordon Chang warned that Beijing has already shown it can penetrate US defense programs and should be assumed to be targeting the F-35 again.

“We should assume China has everything already. They already stole the whole plane once. They probably did it again,” he told Fox News Digital last year, cautioning, “Washington must balance the risks with the strategic benefits of strengthening ties with Riyadh.”

Earlier, Su Bin, who worked in Canada under the name Stephen Su, stole tens of thousands of documents on the F-22 and F-35 with help from Chinese hackers, as detailed in a previous EurAsian Times report

For now, a looming concern in US intelligence circles and the Pentagon is that if China gained access to F-35 technology and secrets, it could use them to further refine its own fifth-generation stealth fighters or develop tactics to counter the F-35.

Beyond concerns over Chinese espionage, a Saudi purchase of F-35s also faces opposition from Israel, which fears that delivering these cutting-edge stealth fighters would erode its Qualitative Military Edge (QME).

The US has an agreement with Israel, which stipulates that US weapons supplied to Israel should be “superior in capability” compared to those sold to Israel’s neighbors and rivals in the region. Therefore, even if a sale went through, the US could likely downgrade the F-35s meant for Saudi Arabia to strike a balance and honor its commitments to Tel Aviv.

The US could also make the Saudi F-35s technologically inferior to Israeli jets through the software package commissioned for the jet, or ensure the Saudi jets do not receive certain other advanced Israeli features, such as enhanced electronic warfare suites for jamming radars and disrupting enemy communications.

If Saudi Arabia gets the F-35, it will become the first Arab country to have arguably the world’s most sophisticated stealth aircraft. The question is: will the US Congress approve the FMS?



Contact the author at sakshi.tiwari13 (at) outlook.com


***


The main block for Saudi will be the Shailoks who have enormous veto power in the American Congress.





Najib gets conditional pardon, to serve remainder of sentence under house arrest





Najib gets conditional pardon, to serve remainder of sentence under house arrest



Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak arrives at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur on April 7, 2026. — Bernama pic


Summary

  • Former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has been granted a conditional royal pardon, allowing him to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest.
  • This decision was finalized during the Pardons Board meeting for the Federal Territories, with approval from His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, the King of Malaysia.
  • Najib is required to pay a RM50 million fine and adhere strictly to the statutory terms, failing which the pardon will be revoked.
  • Initially sentenced in 2020 for the SRC International corruption case, Najib's sentence was later reduced from 12 to six years, with a previous fine reduced from RM210 million to RM50 million.


By Malay Mail
First Published: Friday, 18 Sep 2026 12:20 PM MYT


PUTRAJAYA, Sept 18 —Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has been granted a conditional royal pardon allowing him to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest, the Legal Affairs Division announced today.

The division under the Prime Minister's Department said the decision was finalized during the 64th meeting of the Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan, and Putrajaya, which convened this morning.

“His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, the King of Malaysia has consented to grant a conditional pardon to Datuk Swri Najib Razak, allowing him to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest until 23 August 2028, subject to his payment of a fine of RM50 million,” the statement said.

The secretariat noted that Najib must strictly comply with all statutory terms attached to the royal pardon. Should he breach any of the stipulated terms, the conditional pardon will be automatically revoked, and he will be immediately returned to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.

Najib was convicted in 2020 in the SRC International corruption case, one of several major trials linked to the 1MDB scandal. He began serving his initial 12-year prison sentence at Kajang Prison in August 2022 after the Federal Court dismissed his final appeal.

His prison term was subsequently halved to six years and his original RM210 million fine reduced to RM50 million following an earlier review by the Federal Territories Pardons Board in early 2024.

The division did not disclose further specific conditions attached to the house arrest order.

France arrests far‑right policeman suspected of plotting terrorist attack and making 3D‑printed weapons





France arrests far‑right policeman suspected of plotting terrorist attack and making 3D‑printed weapons



Picture for illustration purposes only. A policeman who follows ‘a violent radical far-right ideology’ has been arrested in France on suspicion of plotting a terrorist attack. — AFP pic


Summary

  • A French policeman was arrested on suspicion of plotting a terrorist attack and manufacturing weapons, linked to a far-right ideology.
  • The 35-year-old officer, apprehended on August 23, faces charges including preparing a terrorist act and unauthorised weapon manufacture.
  • The arrest follows controversy involving France's National Rally party expelling another officer for racist behaviour, as Marine Le Pen prepares for the upcoming presidential election.


First Published: Friday, 18 Sep 2026 9:51 AM MYT


PARIS, Sept 18 — A policeman who follows “a violent radical far-right ideology” has been arrested in France on suspicion of plotting a terrorist attack, sources told AFP late yesterday.

Confirming a report by the TF1/LCI broadcaster, a judicial source said that the man was also suspected of having manufactured weapons, among other crimes.


A separate source close to the case told AFP that the police officer, aged 35, was “apprehended on the street” on August 23.

He has since been placed in detention while awaiting trial.


According to TF1/LCI, the officer “is suspected of having planned to carry out violent attacks against the interests of the state” and of having “manufactured 3D-printed weapons”, among other things.


The policeman faces charges including preparing a terrorist act, the unauthorised manufacture or trade in weapons in connection with a terrorist organisation and unauthorised weapon possession.

He is also charged with incitement to terrorism through social media.


The police officer’s lawyers had not responded to AFP as of yesterday evening.

The news comes in the wake of revelations that France’s far-right National Rally (RN) party expelled another policeman after body cam footage of him making racist comments sparked outrage.

The RN’s Marine Le Pen hopes to become France’s president in next year’s elections after years of seeking to make the anti-immigration party she inherited from her father more palatable to the wider public. — AFP

China presses Iran to rein in Houthis after Saudi appeal





China presses Iran to rein in Houthis after Saudi appeal


China’s call comes after Saudi Arabia sought Beijing’s help over the group’s rapid advances near the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait


Updated 36 minutes ago · Published on 18 Sep 2026 9:54AM


China has privately asked Iran to use its influence to rein in Yemen’s Houthis (Photo from Reuters) - September 18, 2026



CHINA has privately asked Iran to help rein in Yemen’s Houthis after Saudi Arabia appealed to Beijing over the Iran-backed group’s rapid military advances along the Red Sea coast and around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, according to three Iranian sources familiar with the matter.

Reuters reported on Friday that Houthi advances have increased risks to Saudi oil exports and shipping through the strategic waterway, the sources said, prompting Riyadh to seek China’s help.

Beijing has publicly called for restraint, dialogue and the restoration of safe navigation, but its private message to Tehran went further, with China urging Iran to use its influence over the Houthis to prevent the conflict from spreading further along energy routes vital to the world’s second-largest economy, the sources said.

It was unclear how the message was delivered or whether it was conveyed during a visit to China on Wednesday by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi.

The sources said Tehran responded that regional stability and peace depended on ending the US-Israeli war on Iran.

Chinese officials did not explicitly threaten Iran or indicate that Beijing would use economic pressure if Tehran failed to act, the sources said.

In response to a Reuters request for comment, China’s Foreign Ministry said Beijing did not want regional tensions to spill over into Yemen and the Red Sea.

“China does not wish to see regional tensions further spill over into Yemen and the Red Sea. Escalating regional instability is not in the interests of any party,” it said.

“The sovereignty and security of all countries should be respected, and facilities vital to people's livelihoods must not be targeted. China calls for an end to actions that further complicate the situation and urges resolving issues through dialogue and negotiation,” it added.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry and the Saudi government’s media office did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment.


Dangers Of A Wider Regional War

China has been Iran’s largest trading partner for more than a decade and remains its main oil buyer. Chinese purchases accounted for more than 80% of Iran’s seaborne oil exports in 2025, averaging about 1.4 million barrels per day, according to commodities data and analytics firm Kpler.

A senior Western diplomat in the region said Beijing was among the few capitals that could still pressure Iran to rein in the Houthis.

The Houthis, which emerged in the 1990s in opposition to Saudi Arabia’s Sunni religious influence in Yemen, are armed, trained and funded by Iran, according to Iranian sources and Western countries. The group forms part of Tehran’s anti-Western, anti-Israel “Axis of Resistance”.

Any Houthi threat to shipping through the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait could further worsen the global energy crisis, particularly with the Strait of Hormuz already effectively shut following Iran’s actions there.

Sustained Houthi attacks on vessels or ports in the Red Sea would put pressure on the Middle East’s two main oil-export routes simultaneously, potentially opening a new front in the energy crisis and Iran’s confrontation with the United States.

One of the Iranian sources said Iran and its allies now exert pressure over both ends of the region’s key maritime network, adding that China depends on both routes.

Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran Program at the Middle East Institute in Washington, said China’s interests in the Middle East extended beyond Iran, despite Beijing’s opposition to US pressure on Tehran.

About half of China’s oil imports come from the region, while trade between China and the Gulf Cooperation Council states totals about US$300 billion a year, he said.

“Iran can disrupt Hormuz. But at some point that leverage begins hurting the very power Tehran increasingly depends on,” Vatanka said.


China’s Dilemma

It remains unclear whether Tehran will act on Beijing’s concerns, according to the three Iranian sources.

China remains an important economic and strategic partner for Iran as the country faces continued hostilities with the United States, they said.

Beijing is among the few countries with the financial capacity to provide investment needed to sustain Iran’s oil industry and ease pressure on an economy battered by war and sanctions.

China has also demonstrated diplomatic influence in the region. In 2023, it brokered an agreement that restored diplomatic ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia after years of hostility.

But Beijing’s influence has limits. Critics in Iran have pointed to relatively modest Chinese non-oil trade and investment since the two countries signed a 25-year cooperation pact in 2021, particularly compared with China’s growing investment commitments in Gulf Arab states.

Two of the Iranian sources said China’s interests were only one consideration among Tehran’s competing strategic, economic and political priorities.

“Tehran and Beijing need each other. China is a factor Tehran cannot ignore, and Beijing wants Hormuz reopened and Red Sea shipping secured,” the Western diplomat said. - September 18, 2026

Malaysia must look beyond Malay unity for political stability – Sarawak Minister





Malaysia must look beyond Malay unity for political stability – Sarawak Minister


Sabah and Sarawak had become increasingly uncomfortable with political developments in the peninsula, particularly the growing emphasis on race and religion


Updated 22 hours ago · Published on 17 Sep 2026 12:06PM


“After more than 60 years of Merdeka, there should not be too much focus on race,” he said. - September 17, 2026


by Alfian Z.M. Tahir



MALAYSIA needs to look beyond Malay political unity if it wants lasting stability, says Sarawak minister Datuk Seri Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah.

Karim, who is also Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) information chief, said Sabah and Sarawak had become increasingly uncomfortable with political developments in the peninsula, particularly the growing emphasis on race and religion.

“After more than 60 years of Merdeka, there should not be too much focus on race,” he said.

He stressed that Sarawak did not want to see Malay parties divided, but said political stability should not be measured only by whether Malay parties were united.

“We would love to see stability and togetherness not just among Malay parties in Malaya but also among parties that represent the other races and religious groups,” he said.

Karim said instability in the peninsula would eventually affect the Borneo states, including their development and relations with other countries.

“An unstable Malaya would lead to an unstable Malaysia, and this will also affect Sabah and Sarawak’s future development, especially in our relationship with foreign countries,” he said.

He also urged leaders in the peninsula to remember that Sabah and Sarawak were equal partners in the federation.

Although Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) does not have enough parliamentary seats to determine on its own who should lead the federal government, Karim said its support remained important to parties seeking to form a government.

“GPS is very united and that probably makes the disunited Malayan parties want to court us — to increase their support to form the national government,” he said.

“We will act as the ‘stabiliser’ for who should lead Malaysia.”

Karim made the remarks as he spoke about the importance of Sarawak’s multicultural identity during the opening of the 23rd Kuching Inter-Cultural Mooncake Festival at Carpenter Street last night.

His speech was delivered by Deputy Tourism, Creative Industry and Performing Arts Minister Datuk Snowdan Lawan.

Karim said the festival’s strength was not simply that different communities were represented, but that people from those communities actually mixed and interacted.

“Our diversity is not something that separates us. It is something that brings us together,” he said.

Chinese, Malay, Dayak, Indian and other communities are represented at the festival, with traders, performers, families and young entrepreneurs sharing the historic streets of old Kuching.

Karim said this was also how the city’s heritage remained relevant.

“A heritage street without people is only a collection of old buildings,” he said.

“But when communities continue to gather here, when young entrepreneurs bring new ideas here, when cultural traditions are performed here, and when visitors are welcomed here, heritage becomes alive.”

He said the participation of younger traders was particularly important, as traditions could not survive if younger generations were simply expected to preserve them without having a role in shaping them.

“Our traditions will survive only when the younger generation finds a place within them,” he said.

Karim said KIMF’s 23 editions showed that an event could become part of a city’s identity when it was embraced by the wider community.

“An event may be started by a committee, but an event can survive for more than two decades only when the community embraces it,” he said.

“KIMF has reached that stage. It is no longer merely an annual event. It has become part of Kuching’s story.”

He said the Sarawak government would continue supporting initiatives that promote cultural diversity and the creative industries. – September 17, 2026

***

👍👍👍💙💙💙

Why is the AGC, prosecution so lax over Muhyiddin’s son-in-law who has been missing for 3 long years?





Why is the AGC, prosecution so lax over Muhyiddin’s son-in-law who has been missing for 3 long years?


By Datuk Dr Sivasampoh Kannikuddy
17 hours ago




DATUK Seri Muhammad Adlan Berhan, the son-in-law of eighth premier Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, left Malaysia on May 17, 2023.

The Malaysian Anri-Corruption Commission (MACC) is still seeking him over alleged corruption and misappropriation involving a governmentt project for the registration, recruitment and storage of foreign workers’ biometric data.

The graft buster agency publicly released Adlan’s name, photograph, age and last-known address alongside that of lawyer Mansoor Saat on Aug 7, 2023.

According to MACC, the duo had failed to appear despite being contacted through their lawyers, hence requested the public to provide information concerning their whereabouts.




Adlan denied being a fugitive. Through his lawyer, he claimed that he had left Malaysia legally for business, remained in communication with the investigating officer and would return after completing his affairs provided that the alleged threats and persecution ceased.

That was more than three years ago. If he was contactable and genuinely willing to cooperate, why has he still not returned?


Wishy washy affair

Adlan has not been convicted and remains innocent unless proven guilty. However, innocence should be defended through Malaysia’s legal process – not indefinitely from overseas.

MACC announced in October 2025 that its investigation was complete, all relevant witnesses had been interviewed and assets believed to belong to Adlan abroad were being traced.

An arrest warrant had also reportedly been issued. The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) must therefore explain whether the investigation papers have been reviewed, whether charges have been approved and what legal options remain available while Adlan stays overseas.




Malaysia submitted documents to Interpol in August 2023 seeking a Red Notice. As to-date, the government of the day has never clearly confirmed that Interpol approved and issued it.

An application is not the same as an active Red Notice. Interpol reportedly requested further technical information. Was that information supplied and what is the application’s present status?

Adlan’s Malaysian passport was cancelled only on Sept 12, 2025 which is approximately 28 months after he left Malaysia. Why did such a basic enforcement measure take more than two years?

MACC later suggested that he might be travelling with another passport or foreign travel document. The government must clarify what it has verified about that document and what lawful measures are available to restrict his movements.

Authorities believe that Adlan is in a Middle Eastern country without an extradition treaty with Malaysia.

They also previously claimed that cooperation with Interpol and foreign authorities had produced “new leads”. Has Malaysia since requested deportation, mutual legal assistance or another lawful arrangement to secure his return? What became of those supposed new leads?




Separately, Muhyiddin is currently defending four abuse-of-power and three money-laundering charges involving RM225.3 mil linked to Jana Wibawa.


Why has Adlan not returned home?

He has pleaded not guilty. An MACC officer has reportedly lodged a police report alleging the public disclosure of a classified document referred to during the trial.

Editor’s Note: The Bersatu president was on Tuesday (Sept 15) granted a discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) on four out of seven charges related to the Jana Wibawa project which court hearing commenced on March 10, 2023.

The Kuala Lumpur High Court discharged and acquitted the Pagoh MP of three counts of money laundering and one abuse of power charge involving RM200 mil related to Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd.





Police must investigate that allegation independently. It is unrelated to Adlan’s case and nothing here prejudges Muhyiddin, his lawyers or the on-going court proceedings.

But it creates another serious issue concerning transparency, document security and the handling of politically sensitive MACC investigations.

Muhyiddin frequently speaks about integrity, selective prosecution and political persecution. He should therefore publicly and unequivocally urge his son-in-law to return, cooperate with the authorities and clear his name.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police, the Home Minister and the AGC owe Malaysians clear answers. Why has Adlan not been returned?

Was the Interpol Red Notice ever approved? Why was his passport cancelled only after 28 months? What foreign travel document is he allegedly using? What assets have been traced or frozen? Why has no prosecution followed when MACC says its investigation is complete?

This politically sensitive case cannot be allowed to disappear quietly from public attention. Bring Adlan home, place the evidence before the court and allow justice to proceed transparently, independently and without fear or favour. – Sept 17, 2026



Governance advocate and political commentator, Datuk Dr Sivasampoh Kannikuddy is also a group CEO/executive with a background spanning finance, banking and strategic management, including leadership roles with MyOwn Inc.

Negeri crisis an embarrassment to UMNO, says former supreme council member





Negeri crisis an embarrassment to UMNO, says former supreme council member


Puad, who left Umno in June, said the developments were embarrassing for the party, particularly after voters had given it a strong mandate to form a stable state government


Updated 14 hours ago · Published on 17 Sep 2026 6:00PM


The controversy intensified after Menteri Besar Datuk Ismail Lasim claimed he had been forced to sign the proclamation. - September 17, 2026


by Alfian Z.M. Tahir



FORMER Umno Supreme Council member Datuk Dr Mohd Puad Zarkashi has questioned whether Negeri Sembilan Umno is facing an internal split amid the controversy surrounding a proclamation linked to the position of Yang di-Pertuan Besar Negeri Sembilan.

Puad, who left Umno in June, said the developments were embarrassing for the party, particularly after voters had given it a strong mandate to form a stable state government.

The controversy intensified after Menteri Besar Datuk Ismail Lasim claimed he had been forced to sign the proclamation.

Ismail subsequently lodged a police report, saying his signature on the Instrument of Proclamation had been made without his consent and under duress.

The state government had also questioned the process and procedures surrounding the document.

The statements that followed from members of the state executive council have now prompted Puad to question whether there are differing positions within the state administration.

“To the people, it looks like there is an internal crisis. It does not make sense for state executive councillors to issue a media statement,” he said in a Facebook post.

Puad then asked whether the developments pointed to the existence of two factions within Negeri Sembilan Umno.

“Is it true that there are two different factions within Negeri Sembilan Umno?” he asked.

He called on Umno to issue an official statement explaining what had happened and what steps the party intended to take to resolve the matter.

Puad did not provide evidence that Negeri Sembilan Umno is divided into two factions. His comments were based on the series of statements and developments surrounding the controversy.

The dispute, which initially centred on questions involving the state’s customs and constitutional processes, has now also raised questions about political unity within the state administration. – September 17, 2026

Masuk Syurga Bersama PAS


Malaysiakini:





Yeoh denies signing Najib's house arrest order, calls document fake








Yeoh denies signing Najib's house arrest order, calls document fake


Published: Sep 18, 2026 7:46 AM


Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Federal Territories) Hannah Yeoh has denied signing a house arrest order for imprisoned former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak, saying the document circulating on social media is fake.

“I have never signed a house arrest order such as the one currently circulating on social media. The Pardons Board has yet to convene.

“Please do not circulate this fake document. My press secretary has lodged a report with the authorities,” she said in a social media post late last night.

Earlier, Yeoh’s press secretary Ahmad Fazli Yadi also denied that the minister had signed the letter, describing it as slander.


“I deny that it is the official signature (of Yeoh on the document), and it is clear this is pure slander. It is not Yeoh’s signature.

“I will file a report with authorities soon,” he said on Threads.


The circulation of the letter, which also bore a “royal seal”, comes amid a news report that the Federal Territories Pardons Board is scheduled to reconvene today (Sept 18) to consider Najib’s application, just a week after the matter was deferred.




Najib's application postponed

Following the previous meeting, the Legal Affairs Division of the Prime Minister’s Department said the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had consented to defer Najib’s application to the board’s next meeting.

At the same meeting, the Agong also consented to the release of 65 prisoners, with non-citizens to be deported to their countries of origin within six months.

On Wednesday, Yeoh said any views she had expressed concerning Najib during the previous Pardons Board meeting were made with the nation’s interests in mind.

"I have stated my views honestly, guided by my conscience, and with the best interests of the nation in mind. In accordance with Article 42 of the Federal Constitution, the authority and final decision rest with the Agong, including the decision to defer Najib's pardon bid," she said.

The possibility of Najib’s application being considered has also triggered a war of words between Pakatan Harapan and Umno.

This followed a statement by the Harapan presidential council which, without naming anyone, said individuals convicted of corruption or abuse of power, particularly in high-profile cases, should serve the full sentences handed down by the courts.

Najib began serving a 12-year prison term in 2022 after being convicted in the SRC International corruption case. In 2024, the Pardons Board halved his sentence and reduced the RM210 million fine to RM50 million.

In December last year, Najib was convicted of corruption for a second time and sentenced to 15 years in jail over the 1MDB case, together with an RM11.38 billion fine, which he will serve after completing his SRC sentence.

EVIL AS EVIL CAN BE


From the FB page of:




Sons of BAAL




Umno, PAS still not on the same page on ummah unity, say analysts





Umno, PAS still not on the same page on ummah unity, say analysts


2 hours ago
Chia Wan Rou


They say the latest ummah unity endeavour may face some hiccups if it involves PAS's PN allies, particularly Hamzah Zainudin's Wawasan


The rekindling of ties between Umno and PAS saw leaders of both parties attending each other’s annual general assemblies earlier this month.



PETALING JAYA: PAS and Umno still appear to be on different wavelengths about the form of cooperation required to “unite the ummah”, particularly whether it should involve other parties in Perikatan Nasional (PN), say analysts.

Akademi Nusantara’s Azmi Hassan said Umno appeared to prefer dealing directly with PAS, as it did under its now-defunct Muafakat Nasional pact.

He said the ummah unity endeavour was likely to face some hiccups if it involved PAS’s PN allies, particularly opposition leader Hamzah Zainudin’s Wawasan, which also vies for Malay-majority seats.


The inclusion of more parties would mean more complicated seat negotiations, especially ahead of the 16th general election, he added.

“To Umno, unity of the ummah specifically means uniting with PAS only.


“That’s why they only want to deal with PAS, so that it’s PAS’s responsibility in PN to divide seats among its coalition partners,” he told FMT.

Tawfik Yaakub of Universiti Malaya said PAS was trying to account for its PN partners, including new additions like Wawasan and Pejuang.

However, he said the pact faced a conundrum. He said the push for ummah unity should not be focused on PAS and Umno alone, as it could cause the perception that other parties in PN are only supporting acts and can be sidelined when major negotiations take place.

“Any formula for political cooperation needs to be inclusive, without sacrificing the interests of partners,” he said.


He also said that expanding the cooperation to more parties would lead to tougher negotiations in terms of key leadership roles, seat allocations and the direction of Barisan Nasional (BN) and PN’s relationship.

A wider cooperation model could help PAS build a more inclusive Malay unity image, but lead to conflicting interests between parties, he said.

Earlier this week, PAS deputy president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man said PAS and Umno needed to expand their ummah unity agenda to more parties instead of limiting it to themselves.

Tuan Ibrahim argued that the shifting political landscape and entry of young voters demanded a more inclusive political framework.


BN and PAS-led PN formed an alliance in the Negeri Sembilan election which secured a two-thirds majority in the state assembly.

The rekindling of ties between Umno and PAS saw leaders of both parties attending each other’s annual general assemblies earlier this month.

Umno deputy president Mohamad Hasan however said the party must spearhead any cooperation to forge Malay-Muslim political unity, and that Umno had been deceived by others in past efforts.

Rumours circulating of FT Pardons Board to discuss Najib's application tomorrow





Rumours circulating of FT Pardons Board to discuss Najib's application tomorrow


Thursday, 17 Sep 2026 | 9:29 PM MYT



PETALING JAYA: There is speculation that the Federal Territories Pardons Board will sit on Friday (Sept 18) to discuss former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's application for pardon.

This came days after the matter of Najib's pardon was deferred during the board's last meeting on Sept 11.


The Star has reached out but has yet to receive confirmation of the meeting.

The decision to defer Najib's bid for pardon was made at the 63rd meeting of the Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya on Sept 11.


The Prime Minister’s Department’s Legal Affairs Division had said then the board agreed to defer Najib’s application for a pardon to a future meeting.

The meeting was held in Putrajaya.

Najib, 73, was convicted of misappropriating RM42mil belonging to SRC International and sentenced to 12 years in prison, along with a RM210mil fine.


He began serving his sentence at Kajang Prison on Aug 23, 2022.

The Pardons Board subsequently halved his prison term to six years and reduced the fine to RM50mil.

On Dec 22, then High Court judge Justice Alice Loke, now a Court of Appeal judge, dismissed Najib’s application to serve the remainder of his reduced sentence under house arrest.

Najib later withdrew his appeal against the decision.


Prosecuted Until Politically Convenient

 

Dennis Ignatius

 

~ Provoking discussion, dissent & debate on politics, diplomacy, human rights & civil society.

Prosecuted Until Politically Convenient

Tags

, , , ,



[1] On Monday, the Kuala Lumpur High Court acquitted Muhyiddin Yassin of four charges linked to Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd, after the prosecution applied for a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA). The judge, noting that the prosecution offered no reason for the DNAA application — only that it did not wish to proceed — ordered Muhyiddin to be discharged and acquitted.¹

[2] The AGC has since tried to explain itself, arguing that a prosecutor’s duty is not simply to press ahead with any case regardless of circumstance, but to proceed only with charges resting on a sufficient evidentiary basis that can be sustained in court.² Fair enough, as a principle. But the AGC also denied that the four charges were without basis. They cannot have it both ways. Either the evidence was insufficient, in which case they should explain why they went ahead with the charges in the first place, or if the evidence was sound, why the charges were dropped. Asserting both at once is not an explanation; it is evasion dressed up as prosecutorial prudence.

[3] One is left to wonder whether the AGC is incompetent or simply dancing to the drumbeat of its political masters, turning the prosecutorial tap on or off as political expediency demands. Either way, it doesn’t speak well of the AGC or the government. Separating the office of the public prosecutor from that of the AG has long been touted as the fix. After this, one has to wonder if it would fix anything.

[4] This kind of sudden about-turn happens with some regularity. Zahid Hamidi’s case is the starkest example: in January 2022 the High Court found a prima facie case on all 47 charges.³ In September 2023, mid-defence, the prosecution suddenly sought a DNAA, which the court granted.⁴ By January 2026, the AGC closed the file for good, citing insufficient evidence, never addressing the prima facie finding its own prosecutors had secured.⁵

[5] All these about turns have left stunned citizens with tons of questions. Is the AGC chronically incapable of building prosecutable cases against the powerful? Why are charges levelled and then suddenly withdrawn? Has our justice system been taken hostage by our politicians? Does political expediency trump justice? Why are charges brought mostly against opposition figures? Is it mere coincidence or is someone pulling the strings from behind?

[6] The AGC said it had dropped the four charges against Muhyiddin in order to strengthen the case for the remaining charges.⁶ When the charges against Zahid were dropped, the AGC issued a statement suggesting it was only a temporary measure until a more thorough and complete investigation was completed.⁷ Let’s see where all this leads this time. Will Muhyiddin and Bersatu suddenly have a change of heart and declare support for Anwar as Zahid did? If it turns out that way, it will be the height of cynicism and hypocrisy, and the end of the rule of law in Malaysia.

[7] There’s irony here too. The Malay Mail reported that Muhyiddin himself called Zahid’s 2023 DNAA a threat that would “shake the confidence of investors in our justice system.”⁸ No doubt his faith in the legal system has now been fully restored thanks to this latest discharge.

[8] But the double standard runs deeper than one man’s convenient memory. Lim Guan Eng, a member of Anwar’s own coalition, has been on trial since 2020 over the Penang undersea tunnel project — a case that, the court heard in May, initial MACC investigators found insufficient evidence to bring in the first place.⁹ Five years on, it grinds forward while the cases against Zahid and Muhyiddin were discontinued. It looks like which side of the aisle you sit on doesn’t matter as much as how useful you are in the scheme of things at any given time. So far, the DAP has not said anything about the apparent contradiction.

[9] Every time I start to believe that Anwar is really getting serious about fighting corruption and upholding the law, something happens to dash my hopes — a high profile case allowed to fade into the background, allegations against a crony ignored, another DNAA offered without credible explanation. It’s all too convenient. How does one sustain faith in a prime minister whose administration seems to have so little respect for the rule of law and the justice system.

[10] Some argue that Anwar has to make compromises for the sake of political and economic stability, that he needs more time to implement reforms. But if, in the process, our justice system is discredited and diminished, what’s the point of it all? What future can there be for Malaysia without a credible justice system?

[Dennis Ignatius | Kuala Lumpur | 17 September 2026]

Aminuddin wants action against exco members over royal statement



Malaysia's #1 Content Aggregator



Aminuddin wants action against exco members over royal statement


17 Sep 2026 • 9:53 AM MYT



Daily Express



PETALING JAYA: Former Negeri Sembilan menteri besar Aminuddin Harun has urged the authorities to take action against the state executive council members involved in issuing a statement affirming Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir’s removal as the Yang Dipertuan Besar.

Aminuddin said the actions of the exco members in issuing the Sept 16 statement amounted to an act of treason against Tuanku Muhriz.

“I urge the authorities to take appropriate legal action against every exco member involved,” he said in a statement.



👍👍👍


Aminuddin also said that under the constitution, exco members have no power to make decisions concerning the Yang Dipertuan Besar’s position.

The state executive council yesterday said that Tuanku Muhriz’s removal in April was legitimate and that Tuanku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar was therefore the new ruler of Negeri Sembilan.

It said the council, chaired by menteri besar Ismail Lasim, convened on Tuesday and collectively decided that the April 19 proclamation for the removal of Tuanku Muhriz had been signed and sealed by the duly constituted and incumbent undangs.

The council said that the proclamation was also signed by Ismail on Aug 3, rendering it complete in accordance with Article 10(2) of the Negeri Sembilan constitution. Ismail has disputed the validity of the document.

Aminuddin pointed out Ismail’s statement on Sept 9 that the state government had taken the position that the instrument he signed did not comply with the processes and procedures provided for under Article 10 of the Negeri Sembilan constitution.

“However, seven days later, the exco members decided that the proclamation was duly completed and had taken effect. This change in position is difficult to understand,” Aminuddin said.

Aminuddin, who was still menteri besar on April 19, said a proclamation to remove Tuanku Muhriz was presented to him while he was in office. However, he reiterated that he refused to sign the document and explained his reasons publicly on April 20.

“I do not recognise the Sept 16 exco announcement. I affirm that Tuanku Muhriz is the Yang Dipertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan,” he said.

DAP’s Bahau assemblyman Teo Kok Seong said yesterday that the statement purportedly issued by members of the Negeri Sembilan executive council should not be considered to represent the state government, only the council members involved.

Rembau Undang Hassan Ab Hamid had said that the exco members could not supersede the Negeri Sembilan constitution, as the Dewan Keadilan and Undang had declared the proclamation invalid, while lawyer Rosli Dahlan also questioned the validity of the statement.