Thursday, September 10, 2026

Defending Malays doesn’t mean protecting wrongdoers, says Pejuang

 FMT:


Defending Malays doesn’t mean protecting wrongdoers, says Pejuang

Defending Malays doesn’t mean protecting wrongdoers, says Pejuang

The party's deputy president Mior Haidir says concerns over selective prosecution should not be used to shield individuals from the legal process.

Pejuang deputy president Mior Haidir said rejecting selective prosecution is not the same as rejecting the legal process. (Facebook pic)
PETALING JAYA:
Defending the Malays does not mean protecting those who have committed wrongdoing and opposing selective prosecution does not mean rejecting the legal process, says Pejuang deputy president Mior Haidir.

Mior said in a statement that questions over selective prosecution were legitimate, but this did not justify halting prosecutions or protecting individuals.

“If there’s wrongdoing, investigate and charge. If not guilty, give room to mount a defence. The law must proceed without regard to who holds power and who becomes the victim,” he said.

He warned that political cooperation among Malay parties must not be used to shield individuals facing prosecution.

“If unity is only sought when pressure intensifies, the public has the right to ask: does it really stem from genuine awareness of the need to unite the race, or is it merely a manoeuvre to find a way out of present difficulties?” he asked.

His statement comes after recent charges were filed against several Umno figures following probes into Tabung Haji and Felda.

It also comes as Umno and PAS pressed for Malay unity, with the two parties rekindling their relationship after Barisan Nasional and PAS-led Perikatan Nasional had an understanding in the Negeri Sembilan state election which led them to win a two-thirds majority in the state assembly.

Mior said Malay unity should not be “an umbrella that is opened when it rains and folded when the weather clears”.

He also said any effort to unite the Malays should instead be built around a broader agenda covering the economy, education, asset ownership, integrity, governance and the future of the Malay community and not just to protect an individual or a particular group’s interests.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“We need more mature politics; politics that can defend Malay rights without sacrificing principles, uphold justice regardless of who is involved, and reject corruption regardless of the perpetrator,” he said.

Ukrainian F-16s Forced to Rely on Cannons Due to Severe Air-to-Air Missile Shortage

 



Ukrainian F-16s Forced to Rely on Cannons Due to Severe Air-to-Air Missile Shortage

Military Watch Magazine Editorial Staff


Ukrainian Air Force F-16 pilots are increasingly being forced to engage aerial targets using their aircraft’s onboard cannon because of an acute shortage of air-to-air missiles, highlighting the severe ammunition constraints facing Ukraine’s Western-supplied fighter fleet. Reports point to a significant limitation for a force whose effectiveness depends heavily on access to modern air-to-air weapons. While the F-16 is equipped with a six-barrel M61A1 20mm Vulcan cannon for short-range engagements, its principal advantage in air combat comes from its ability to employ guided missiles against targets at considerably greater distances.

Ukrainian Air Force F-16 Equipped for Air-to-Air Combat
Ukrainian Air Force F-16 Equipped for Air-to-Air Combat

Using the cannon against airborne targets is not an alternative method of employing the same fighter. It generally requires the F-16 to approach much closer to its target, increasing the exposure of the Ukrainian aircraft to enemy fighters, surface-to-air missiles and other air-defence systems. The reported shortage is particularly consequential because Ukrainian F-16s have primarily been employed in defensive missions rather than traditional fighter-versus-fighter engagements. The aircraft have been used to intercept cruise missiles and drones threatening Ukrainian cities and military infrastructure, placing substantial demands on stocks of air-to-air missiles.

Russian Geran 2 Attack Drone During Strike on Ukraine
Russian Geran 2 Attack Drone During Strike on Ukraine

Ukraine’s F-16 fleet has received weapons from several NATO member states, including AIM-9 Sidewinder short-range infrared guided missiles and AIM-120 AMRAAM medium-range radar guided missiles. These weapons allow the aircraft to engage targets without necessarily having to close to cannon range, but continued combat operations can rapidly consume stocks, particularly when relatively inexpensive drones and cruise missiles have to be intercepted. The economics of the problem are especially challenging. A fighter such as the F-16 may be able to destroy a drone with a missile, but doing so can represent a disproportionately expensive use of ammunition. Yet allowing an incoming drone or cruise missile to continue toward its target can result in potentially much greater damage.

F-16 Fires AIM-120 Air-to-Air Missile
F-16 Fires AIM-120 Air-to-Air Missile

Ukraine has faced increasingly serous shortages of advanced weaponry, including interceptors for its MIM-104 Patriot long range air defence systems. While its F-16s were supplied second hand after being retired by multiple European air forces, and are obsolete Cold War era variants being phased out of NATO air forces, demand for modern air-to-air missiles remains high across Western and Western-aligned states. A greater reliance on cannons highlights the continue importance of visual range combat capabilities for even more modern fighter types, as in a high intensity conflict scenario the depletion of supplies of air-to-air missiles could force air forces to adapt doctrine to emphasise visual range engagements.