Saturday, August 15, 2026

Is the US ready for President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?





Is the US ready for President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez?


David Smith in Washington


Composite: The Guardian/Getty Images


The New York congresswoman’s power is in the spotlight as people wonder if the stars are finally aligning for her to run for US president in 2028
Sat 15 Aug 2026 15.00 AEST
Share


“They assume that my ambition is positional. They assume that my ambition is a title or a seat. And my ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country.”


The words were delivered slowly, deliberately and with some steeliness by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Her audience, crammed into the pews of Rockefeller Memorial chapel at the University of Chicago, burst into spontaneous applause. That was in May. In the three months since, the speculation around Ocasio-Cortez’s ambitions – for herself and for America – has only grown louder.

Friends and foes alike wonder if the stars are aligning for the New York congresswoman to run for US president in 2028. They point to voters raging against the machine – including the ageing Democratic party establishment – and hungry for change. They note how progressives pushing for economic justice and universal healthcare have won a string of impressive victories in mayoral elections and congressional primaries over the past year.


Then there are the opinion polls. Last month a Granite State Poll from the University of New Hampshire found Ocasio-Cortez leading a potential Democratic field in that crucial state. She has the kind of name recognition that money can’t buy, nearly 10m followers on Instagram alone and fans ranging from the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) to Nancy Pelosi, the former speaker of the House of Representatives.

As Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden showed, presidential elections have a habit of finding the right person at the right time in the right place. Ocasio-Cortez, a 36-year-old with a progressive agenda and can’t-be-taught social media smarts, could meet the moment for a nation eager for a fresh start after a decade of Trumpism.

If modern politics is about pendulum swings, it is hard to imagine anyone who better personifies a rebuke of the octogenarian Trump and his nativist “Make America great again” (Maga) movement. This week a Zogby Strategies national poll found that a generic democratic socialist candidate leads generic Maga candidate 45% to 33%.

Ashik Siddique, a co-chair of the DSA, of which Ocasio-Cortez is a member, said: “If she were to throw her hat in the ring, there would be a lot of excitement for it from members of Democratic Socialists of America. We definitely want to see a strong working class voice in the 2028 presidential primary.”

Ocasio-Cortez has not ruled out a run for president and her actions have done nothing to quell the notion of a campaign in stealth mode. Last year she joined her mentor, the independent senator Bernie Sanders, on a “Fighting Oligarchy” tour that drew huge crowds. More recently she has crisscrossed the country to support progressive candidates, further enhancing her national profile.

In the past week alone she made two moves that intensified political pundits’ chatter. First Ocasio-Cortez used Instagram to announce that she is freezing her eggs, a decision she described as a move to “feel more in control of my life”. She acknowledged the “political risk” in sharing personal family planning details but stated her goal is to normalise conversations about the professional and personal challenges women face. The internet quickly became awash in speculation that Ocasio-Cortez ended her relationship with and engagement to long-time partner Riley Roberts , driven by reports from Puck News and others noting she had long since stopped appearing with him in public and mentioning his name.

Then, when asked by ABC interviewer Jonathan Karl about the cultural battles of the 2020 pandemic era – including calls from some on the left to defund the police – she laughed and, quoting a New York city council ally, remarked: “Woke One was crazy” – apparently trying to draw a strategic line between hard-fought struggles for racial justice and the performative excesses of lockdown isolation that became an easy target for the right.

Unlike many would-be presidents of the time, Ocasio-Cortez does not appear to be driven by personal ego, according to those who knew her, which may prove to be her political superpower. She was a volunteer organiser for Sanders’ 2016 campaign, his first presidential run and one that built a national movement around his vision of democratic socialism, even as he lost to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.


Ocasio-Cortez during her victory celebration New York City in 2018. Photograph: Rick Loomis/Getty Images


When she decided to run for office herself, the former bartender and waitress had virtually no money but was assisted by progressive organisations such as Brand New Congress and Justice Democrats. In 2018 she beat 10-term incumbent congressman Joe Crowley, a member of the Democratic leadership and potential future speaker, in a New York primary.

Corbin Trent, her first communications director in the House of Representatives and the co-founder of Justice Democrats, was there on the night she ousted Crowley. He recalls that the political industrial complex began trying to map her career path before the ink on the ballots was even dry.

“Primary night, she beats Joe Crowley,” he recalled. “I get phone calls from elected officials and other people and their question is, what’s next? What’s the pathway here? What’s she going to run for? What higher office would she seek? This is literally a few hours after the polls close in the primary. That’s the way DC thinks. Not, hey, what can we do with Medicare for all or this or that or any of the other things?”

As Ocasio-Cortez’s national profile exploded – bringing in $15m in her first electoral cycle and attracting unprecedented demands from foreign heads of state – Trent tried to lay out a long-term strategic map. He suggested upstate New York events to prepare for a statewide Senate run. But she resisted the logic of political careerism.

“To my chagrin and frustration that never was a way in which she could plan or operate. She did not have an idea in her head of this ultimate prize of president or governor or senator.”

Instead, Trent argues, her appeal lies in a rare authenticity – an ability to validate the deep-seated economic anxiety of Americans. “Alexandria has two things going for her. She’s genuinely curious about other people. It’s not like she has to pretend to be. I’ve had politicians ask me, ‘How can I be more genuine?’ Well, that’s probably not going to help if you have to fucking ask me that.

“Two, she is genuinely open about herself. Some people believe that nobody cares what they think or who they are and then other people don’t want you to know who they are. She doesn’t suffer from either of those failings.”

Other observers agree that Ocasio-Cortez has that X factor missing from so many professional politicians: relatability. Chris Scott, a political strategist who served as the coalition director for Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign, said: “When you talk about AOC’s humble beginnings being a bartender that’s a lived experience story that resonates, especially with millennials, with their upbringing.

“What you are starting to see – whether it’s conservative or progressive - is people are leaning more and more towards candidates with lived experience that they feel they relate to as politics gets more polarising.”

That said, Ocasio-Cortez has now been in Washington long enough to draw accusations of going from outsider to insider. The activist who critiqued the establishment and championed the Green New Deal has spent recent years working closely with Democratic leadership. This week she received warm praise from Pelosi, who told a Politico summit in Sacramento, California: “I think that she has been so operational, and it’s just wonderful. I know it’s a joy to work with her.”

The transition has caused some on the far left to wonder if the system has simply co-opted its most dangerous critic. Cenk Uygur, a controversial political commentator and co-founder of the online progressive news show The Young Turks, watches Ocasio-Cortez’s recent evolution with a mixture of policy agreement and tactical despair.

Ocasio-Cortez has described Israel’s actions in Gaza as a “genocide” and last month voted to block US military aid to the country. But Uygur has not forgotten her high-profile appearance at the 2024 Democratic National Convention, where she delivered a rousing speech praising vice-president Harris’s efforts to secure a ceasefire in Gaza — a claim that many leftwing activists viewed as a dishonest whitewashing of the administration’s complicity in the conflict.


Ocasio-Cortez speaks during the Democratic national convention in August 2024. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images


“Why did she basically fib on Kamala Harris’s behalf during the DNC and pretend that Kamala Harris cared about Palestinians and was trying to keep the Israelis in check?” he said. “Because she secretly loves Israel? No, it’s because she wanted to prove to mommy and daddy that she’s a good girl. If you’re a good girl you support Kamala Harris and, if you need to, you fudge her record.

“Then you go tell Jonathan Karl that your side is ‘crazy’ and you changed and you can’t explain what you changed into or how you changed or why you changed. But the message is super clear both for the establishment and progressives: ‘I’m not going to challenge the system so establishment, you can rest easy, I’m not a threat.’ And they have rested easy. That’s why she’s getting enormously positive coverage.”

The 2028 Democratic presidential primary election is expected to be crowded and noisy. If Ocasio-Cortez runs, she might face challenges from fellow progressive Congressman Ro Khanna of California along with heavyweights including Harris, Pete Buttigieg, Gavin Newsom and Jon Ossoff. Some Democrats, scarred by Clinton and Harris’s defeats in 2016 and 2024, might be reluctant to nominate Ocasio-Cortez out of perceived expediency if they believe the US is still not ready to elect its first female president, a fear expressed by former first lady Michelle Obama among others.

The congresswoman faces another potentially formidable hurdle. Centrist Democrats have long argued that the democratic socialist wing of the party might succeed with white, college-educated voters but struggles to connect with African American communities, pointing to primary races where progressive insurgents have hit a wall. That could prove decisive in an early primary state such as South Carolina.

Nina Turner, a national co-chair of Sanders’ 2020 campaign, who has just been travelling in South Carolina, said: “There are some rumblings in some segments of the Black community that DSA and progressives in general are not doing what it takes to court Black voters and in some ways are leaving us behind for other people who are of colour but not Black.

“That’s real and so DSA as well as progressives are going to have to do something to say, no, we understand the Black plight and we understand that the survival of working-class people comes through Black liberation. They have not done a good job of doing that. I’m hoping that they will.”

Antjuan Seawright, a Democratic strategist in South Carolina, suggests that Ocasio-Cortez’s national viability depends on her remaining a disciplined team player who addresses universal, kitchen-table concerns. He said: “I would love her to run as far away as she can from being any sort of liability in places where we know we have to win in November where we’ve lost before because people have been used as a weapon of mass political destruction and distraction.

“If she continues to talk about health care in such a way that is accessible and affordable for all Americans without burning down the system, but making some alterations to the system, she will be a positive voice to the conversation.”

If she runs, Ocasio-Cortez can also expect a crude onslaught from Republicans and a rightwing media machine that has spent years demonising her as a radical communist who threatens the essence of America. Her “Woke One was crazy,” comment has been seen as an attempt to assuage the concern.

Tara Setmayer, a former Republican communications director on Capitol Hill, said: “That was a very interesting strategic decision to do that and that’s her way of trying to moderate. But she’s palling around with Bernie Sanders and hasn’t completely, as far as I’m aware, repudiated [the influencer] Hasan Piker and some of those leftwing folks. People are not going to forget that and, in this day and age of the internet, it lives forever.”

Setmayer, cofounder of the Seneca Project, a women-led, bipartisan political super political action committee, argues that, instead of campaigning for the White House, Ocasio-Cortez could seek to cement her legislative power by challenging Chuck Schumer for his New York Senate seat.

“If I were advising her, given the failures, unfortunately, of women candidates for the Democrats over the last two election cycles, it would behoove her to run for Senate,” Setmayer said. “She’s almost guaranteed to win that Senate seat.


Ocasio Cortez outsie the US Capitol in January 2023. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images


“It would provide her more gravitas and she’s young enough that she could do a term or two – or a term and a half like Barack Obama – and then run for president. I don’t think that she can go from being a congresswoman to a serious presidential candidate without some time in the Senate.”

History, however, is littered with examples of White House aspirants who waited their turn and missed their moment. There are others, such as Obama, who said “carpe diem” and rode a wave all the way into the Oval Office.

Ocasio-Cortez, who would beat Theodore Roosevelt and John F Kennedy to become the youngest US president in history, has said her ambition is way bigger than that. The calling to change America may prove irresistible.

Kurt Bardella, a political commentator and former congressional aide, said: “When you look at the current trajectory of the Democratic party, she is the natural successor to the Bernie Sanders-Elizabeth Warren coalition. She is one of the most gifted communicators in all of politics.

“She is someone who engenders a tremendous amount of passion, either for or against. She does possess the unique quality of: people give a shit. She’s got a lot more going for her than most people. She never has to worry about standing out. The attention vacuum that we live in, and the way that content works, she is in a league of her own.”



Hounded to death (literally), a black professor at Cambridge

 



Jason Arday, professor at centre of Cambridge plagiarism row, found dead

Academic was pronounced dead at his home in south London after police called to address after 3pm on Friday



Jason Arday was appointed as professor of sociology of education at Cambridge in 2023, and was the university’s youngest black professor. Photograph: Christian Sinibaldi/The Guardian

Jason Arday, the academic who resigned last week as a professor at the University of Cambridge, has been found dead at his home in south London.

The Metropolitan police said officers were called to Arday’s address by the London ambulance service after 3pm on Friday.

A spokesperson for the Met said: “A 41-year-old man was pronounced dead at the scene. His next of kin have been informed and are being supported by officers.

“At this time his death is being treated as unexpected, but is not believed to be suspicious. The case is being investigated by officers from the Met’s central south command unit. A file will be prepared for the coroner.”

The body was believed to be that of Arday. At this stage, police are understood not to believe anyone else was involved in the death.

London ambulance service was the first emergency service at the scene. The person discovered inside the home was found unresponsive.

Arday’s family said in a statement: “Jason was subjected to a campaign of sustained abuse for more than three years since he accepted the role of professor at Cambridge University by those who would leave no stone unturned in their quest to undermine him.

“The campaign of misinformation was too much for Jason, who was a gentle man and who always wanted to see the best in everyone.

“We are in shock to have lost this amazing father, partner, brother, uncle and son.

“We won’t comment further at this point beyond asking the press to leave us alone now, and to stop the campaign of harassment which has been waged against Jason and his family for too long.”

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said: “I’m devastated for the family and friends of Jason Arday. He faced an unacceptable public hounding and campaign of abuse. I know many Londoners will be angry and upset this evening.

“Jason Arday was the victim of a pernicious public shaming that other people in his position simply wouldn’t have faced. His death was a tragedy, but once again it should be a wake-up call for all of us.”

Arday was appointed professor of sociology of education at Cambridge in 2023, and was the university’s youngest-ever black professor. But he resigned last week after accusations of plagiarism and inconsistencies in statements about his career and achievements.

In a statement announcing his resignation, Arday said: “It is with profound sadness that I write to resign, with immediate effect, from my position at the University of Cambridge and Jesus College.

“When I accepted the extraordinary honour of becoming professor of sociology at Cambridge, it was, without question, the greatest professional privilege of my life.”

Arday said he had been driven to resign because the “relentless accusations, speculation and public commentary have taken a profound toll on me and on those I love”.

Prof Deborah Prentice, Cambridge’s vice-chancellor, said in a statement: “We are desperately saddened to hear this tragic news. Our heartfelt sympathies go to Jason Arday’s family and friends at this incredibly difficult time.”

Durham University, where Arday worked between 2019 and 2021, said: “We are shocked and terribly sad to learn of the death of Jason Arday.

“He is remembered at Durham as a kind and warm person who actively sought to promote opportunities for PhD students. We want to express our deepest sympathy to his family who are in our thoughts.”

Arday’s rise to a prestigious professorial chair was remarkable. Arday said he had been nonverbal until the age of 11, requiring extensive speech and language therapy, as well as being illiterate until 18.

That life story contributed to him being made a torchbearer for the 2012 London Olympics flame.

After leaving school, Arday went on to further study before completing a doctorate in education at Liverpool John Moores University in 2015. That was followed by a string of academic posts culminating in a professorship at the University of Glasgow and a professorial chair at Cambridge.

Arday was initially accused of plagiarising another academic’s work for his PhD thesis. But he denied the accusations, and an investigation by Liverpool John Moores University earlier this year upheld its decision to award him a PhD.

But other elements of his life story were increasingly questioned, including claims of prodigious money-raising for charity and feats of long-distance running.

He was also challenged about whether he was nonverbal as a child.

However those claims meant little in the world of academia. After initially defending Arday as the victim of a smear campaign, as further questions arose about his academic career, the university began to temper its support.

On 5 August Cambridge announced it would hold an internal inquiry after it said it received “new information” about his academic qualifications and honorary appointments, as well as what it described as “a number of ongoing complaints regarding academic misconduct”. Jesus College, of which he was a member, said it would also hold an inquiry.

But while Cambridge said Arday would remain in post and continue to receive support, Arday immediately announced his resignation.

At the end of last week Glasgow University said it would also investigate Arday’s academic credentials.

The controversy has stirred considerable anger within Cambridge’s academic community, both between Arday’s supporters and those who said the university had erred in appointing him to such a prestigious position.

After resisting calls from senior staff for an independent inquiry, earlier this week Prentice backed down, saying she recognised the “anger and anxiety around this damaging and difficult case”.

She described it as an aberration that should not be used to cast aspersions on the abilities of its staff of colour.

Arday’s memoir, entitled Great and Unfortunate Things, was published this week in the US by an imprint of Simon & Schuster, with UK publication scheduled for later this month. Simon & Schuster has been contacted for comment.


What Islamic scholars say about non-Muslim leadership

 



What Islamic scholars say about non-Muslim leadership

What Islamic scholars say about non-Muslim leadership

Views that completely forbid non-Muslims from becoming leaders typically stem from the Salafi-Takfiri perspective.

From Moaz Nair

There is a stark contrast between the stance of certain political factions, such as PAS under Abdul Hadi Awang, and Dr Zakir Naik, both of whom reject non-Muslim leadership—and that of mainstream scholars, whose views are more inclusive and contextual.

The view of the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar

The Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Sheikh Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed El-Tayeb, stated:

“Any Muslim or non-Muslim can become a leader of a society or a country if he is trustworthy. If a leader transgresses (is guilty and untrustworthy), it is the duty of both Muslims (the citizens) and non-Muslims to oppose and not vote for him.”

The influence of the Salafi-Takfiri ideology

Views that completely forbid non-Muslims from becoming leaders typically stem from the Salafi-Takfiri perspective.

They interpret Quranic verses through the lens of the 7th century CE—an era of hostility between Muslims and non-Muslims—without accounting for contemporary contexts. As a result, this ideology tends to readily label others as non-believers (kafir) or apostates (murtad).

Conversely, reputable scholars (ulama muktabar) untethered by this school of thought interpret the Quran through a broader perspective that aligns with the evolution of time.

The view of Sheikh Ali Jum’ah

His Eminence Sheikh Ali Jum’ah, the former Grand Mufti of Egypt, untangles this issue using the example of electing MPs:

  • Election scenario: If there are two candidates—a Muslim candidate with a poor and corrupt administrative record, versus a non-Muslim candidate with a transparent, efficient administrative and management record—the vote should rightfully be given to the non-Muslim candidate who can deliver public benefit (maslahah).
  • Property management analogy: If a person has property or land to manage, that responsibility is undoubtedly assigned to someone who is trustworthy and competent, regardless of their religious background alone.

Confusion over the concept of ‘Wali Amri’

MPs are not “Wali Amri” in the true context of Islamic jurisprudence, such as a supreme ruler. The duty of a MP in the Dewan Rakyat is to enact laws, debate policies, and pass the national budget.

This discussion aims to highlight the distinct contrast between the people of knowledge (fuqaha) who argue based on authentic scholarly disciplines, and individuals who debate legal rulings based purely on sentiment and fervour.

Speaking about Allah’s laws and His verses demands a heavy trust (amanah). This trust requires strength (quwwah), meaning a mastery of knowledge recognised by the scholarly community of Islam.

Conclusion

Some traditional scholars cite Quranic verses, such as verse 141 of Surah An-Nisa and verse 51 of Surah Al-Ma’idah, to argue that Muslims should not place non-Muslims in positions of supreme authority or governance, which might allow them to rule contrary to Islamic principles.

Accordingly, in traditional Islamic jurisprudence and classical political theory, being a Muslim is considered a fundamental prerequisite, particularly for underlying religious obligations like leading prayers or enforcing religious law.

However, a diversity of views exists regarding political leadership, voting systems, and administrative roles within modern pluralistic societies.

Through a modern, contextual lens, the majority of Muslim scholars and contemporary Islamic institutions draw a definitive line between the religious caliphate institutions of past eras and modern civil or political posts today, such as MPs, ministers, or local government leaders in multi-ethnic nations.

Therefore, in multiracial and multicultural countries populated by both Muslims and non-Muslims, they conclude that non-Muslims may hold public office, serve in administrative capacities, or be elected through voting processes based on the principles of justice, efficiency, and their ability to protect citizens’ rights.

Moaz Nair is an FMT reader.