Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Israelis anti-Semitic?

MM Online - Palestinian president calls US ambassador to Israel ‘son of a dog’ (extracts):

Relations between Abbas’s government and Trump’s administration have broken down since the White House recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in December.

The Palestinians also see the disputed city as the capital of their future state and have refused to meet with Trump’s envoys since.

Friedman, who was Trump’s personal lawyer before being appointed last year, is a longstanding supporter of settlement building in the occupied West Bank, considered illegal under international law.

In response to Abbas, Friedman, who is Jewish, told a conference that Abbas’s comments could have anti-Semitic connotations.

“His response was to refer to me as son of a dog. Is that anti-Semitism or political discourse? I leave that up to you,” he said, according to a US embassy spokeswoman.

Anti-Semitism? Who the hell is a Semite?

The dictionary tell us a Semite is "a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs."

That's right, Arabs are also Semites, thus anti-Semitism is also being against Arabs. Therefore I could say quite correctly that Israeli government, settlers and ultras are the most anti-Semitic people.

In recent years there has been a brazen Jewish move to monopolise or copyright-reserve the term 'anti-Semitism' for only Jews to depict global antagonism, hostilities or adverse actions against Jews. It has been part of an ongoing campaign to deliberately promote belief among Westerners that only Jews are Semites while Arabs are just Arabs. 

There has also been a similar move to monopolise the sufferings of atrocities perpetuated by Nazi Germany to Jews, when the fact has been the Nazis killed as many if not more gypsies, non-Aryan races such as Slavs, Poles, Bolsheviks, homosexuals, Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc etc etc.

The aim is of course to claim sole ownership of victim-hood to perpetuate guilt (about the Holocaust in WWII) amongst non-Jewish people, especially Europeans and Americans.

It's fatal for any American or European politician to be termed anti-Semitic, just as it's fatal for any non-Malay Malaysian politician to be described as anti-Melayu or anti-Islam or anti-raja2.

Interesting note: Many do not realise that Chinese are among the most ardent of monarchists while Islamic countries and their clerics (with a few exceptions) promote republicanism.


  1. With typical German bureaucratic thoroughness, the Nazis kept meticulous records of the activities of The Final Solution. How many trainloads were sent to the Extermination Camps, how many people were on board, and their category .

    There is Zero doubt (except among Neo Nazis and Racist deniers) that the primary target of The Final Solution was the eradication of Juden or Jews.

    There were other groups in Europe which were considered Undesirables, but they were comparatively. also-rans.

    It appears Ktemoc is not only politically opposed to the State of Israel , which I can accept as a political viewpoint, but he has a Racist abhorrence to those who profess the religion of Judaism - which I condemn.

    1. where is it that I've written/denied the primary target of The Final Solution was the eradication of Juden or Jews.

    2. don't promote fake news Monsterball

    3. 1) WHY r u so keapochi in meddling in a family feud, lagi teruk, consistently?

      U got a share of the family heirloom (wakakakaka, a piece of the rock from the Holy of Holies/The Dome and Al-Aqsa Mosque)?

      2) mana Monsterball accused u about the aim of the Final Solution?

      U buat fake accusation ke?

    4. Kaytee exhorted this statement :

      What does yanks know about Malaysia?

      Likewise to kaytee,

      "What the fuck does kaytee knows about Isreal and jews?"

      This youtube clip is very funny. The film is banned in Malaysia though. You know what! Wahid, former Indon President did propose diplomatic recognition between Indonesia and Isreal


      Palestinian : We have settled here (Palestine/Isreal) hurdreds of years

      Zohan : Good point! And none of my ancestors (jews) settled in Isreal......


  2. Israel is apartheid done the right way. The world-sanctioned way.

  3. Apartheid within a family?!!

    What's an insight!!! Wakakakaka

    1. within the Malaysian family?

    2. Wa lau-eh…… can u re-read what u have written ke:

      The dictionary tell us a Semite is "a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs."

      Within the M'sian family? R u naïve or u r smoking something……

      Wakakakaka… over many death bodies lah!

    3. you talked about apartheid in a family, so I showed you an example - ta'boleh baca kah?

    4. Is there an entity known as M'sian family?

      Tell that to the ketuanan freaks & they will show u the mono-ethnic composition they only recognise!

      So sama2 macam that cursed land of Abrahamic cults!

      Siapa tu tak bolih baca?

    5. CK, not sure I have mentioned before kaytee was slighted by one christian teacher while studying in missionary school. Do understand why he is so much against christianity and to the certain jewish.

      I always thought even chinamen from china are very supportive of jews. Hahahaha!

  4. Islamic republicanism is normally associated with Iran and the ideological claims of Ayatollah Khomeini, a Syiah. Saudi Arabia is a Kingdom, a Sunni. Kingdom of Malaysia? Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps?

    1. what about Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Algeria, Chad, Niger, Mali, etc etc etc?

    2. Bloody feudalistic backward looking moron!

    3. Chinese are among the most ardent of monarchists ~ KTemoc

      Then Chinese should suppory the Kingdom of Malaysia.. Wakakaka.

    4. with 5,000 years of experience (ketagih macam merokok, wakakaka) they do, but they keep clear of religion

    5. KT has a weird wet dream thus that most ardent of monarchist cry.

      Causing multiple orgasm amongst the ketuanan freaks!


    6. Kaytee.....huh? Chinamen? Monarchists? Since when?

    7. We need to be very clear this is in relation to CHINA's history ... the Chinese have a long-held belief in The One Paramount Ruler for all of China.

      The latest incarnation Xi Jinping is under the guise of The People's Republic of China... but the roots lie deep in feudalistic China.

      Malaysian Royals....not so much...they will have respect if they are seen as impartial apolitical rulers for All.

      If they are seen as part and parcel of One Race overlordship and partakers in the Corrupt state, then they will not be respected.

    8. Many has misread WHY dynasties exists in China history.

      The monarchists will go through the full orgasm to declare that the Chinese r inherently people of ardent flame of monarchy!

      The problem lies with the common association of monarchy with family linkage inheritancy of power.

      In the very ancient China, emperor was succeeded by a selection process know as 禅让. The successor was chosen based on his ability to serve the common good of the people at large. Bloodline wasn't the consideration. The current emperor abdicated the throne once the successor had been identified.

      The system was abolished when Hsia dynasty was founded & the bloodline inheritance to the throne was 'canonised' by the feudalistic royal households ever since.

      But to the commoner, the spirit of meritocracy remains. Hence, the falls of the various malfeasant dynasties cause by the numerous uprisings along the long corridor of Chinese history.

      Many new emperors were commoners & many dethroned royal houses reversed back to commoner status.

      This is strangely unlike the European system where the royal houses holding on to their inherited titles even when they lost their power.

      Perhaps, this is bcoz social status is strongly & rigidly upheld, just like the caste system of India. Once u r born into that caste/status, yr life pattern is fitted forever.

      For the Chinese, one can interchanges the classes of royal, soldier, scholar, peasant, worker & businessman via ones ability. There r no fixation in life status, it's ALL self-driven with meritocracy.

      And EDUCATION is the only tool for that interchanges.

    9. Really? And you really think that Xi Jinping can survive nong nong if he really alluded to feudalistic mindset?

      If you are talking about kaytee moc kong kali kong, I fully agree la

    10. To add on to CK's point where that cibai kaytee knows NUTS about it while kaytee still insist dispensing his "nuts" (Ptui! Ptui!), even when emperor is ascended to the throne. Those within the bureaucracy are treated with equals. Only think is that chinamen never force the so called emperor to sign the china version of Magna Carta.

      These technocrats can challenge anybody including the emperor himself/herself.....hahahahaha

      Again what does that cibai knows about china and its culture? He didn't even study in chinese primary school. Fuck kaytee la.