Red is the official colour of Umno. The leader of the Red Shirts is the head of its Sungai Besar division. The use of Red Shirts by his band of rabble rousers is no coincidence but an obvious flaunting of this colour to impress the public that they are part and parcel of the ruling government and therefore are carrying out some duty of the government.
That they are carrying out some duty of the government is subtly implied by the deputy home minister, Nur Jazlan, who reasoned that having to use the relevant authorities to maintain public order during street rallies would be a waste of funds.
By this, he actually let the cat out of the bag, as he is implying that it is the right of any “patriotic” groups of people to take the law into their own hands to block roads and stop public rallies. This also explains a lot about the degree of the freedom of speech and actions accorded to the Red Shirts compared to others, particularly those from the opposite side.
A smoke screen was created by statements of cabinet ministers Nazri Aziz, Khairy Jamaluddin and Noh Omar, who said they do not approve of the samseng behaviour of the Red Shirts, and that the Red Shirts are not showing their “patriotism” in the name of Umno. Most of those who roughed up members of the media outside Giant supermarket in Kuala Selangor were not wearing Red Shirts. Mere co-incidence? But Jamal, their general, acknowledged that they were his Red Shirts.
Also present with the anti-Bersih group were Umno Youth exco member Armand Azha Abu Hanifah and Tanjong Karang Umno Youth deputy chief Shahrizal Shaari. If this is not Umno’s official support of the Red Shirts, why were these Unmo officials with the rabble rousers?
Jamal says there wouldn’t be a Red Shirts movement if not for Bersih, the coalition for free and fair elections.”Our intention is not violence, no matter what happens…”If there is no yellow (Bersih), there would be no red. So long as there is yellow, so long as there is Bersih, we’ll be around,” he said.
That they are carrying out some duty of the government is subtly implied by the deputy home minister, Nur Jazlan, who reasoned that having to use the relevant authorities to maintain public order during street rallies would be a waste of funds.
By this, he actually let the cat out of the bag, as he is implying that it is the right of any “patriotic” groups of people to take the law into their own hands to block roads and stop public rallies. This also explains a lot about the degree of the freedom of speech and actions accorded to the Red Shirts compared to others, particularly those from the opposite side.
A smoke screen was created by statements of cabinet ministers Nazri Aziz, Khairy Jamaluddin and Noh Omar, who said they do not approve of the samseng behaviour of the Red Shirts, and that the Red Shirts are not showing their “patriotism” in the name of Umno. Most of those who roughed up members of the media outside Giant supermarket in Kuala Selangor were not wearing Red Shirts. Mere co-incidence? But Jamal, their general, acknowledged that they were his Red Shirts.
Also present with the anti-Bersih group were Umno Youth exco member Armand Azha Abu Hanifah and Tanjong Karang Umno Youth deputy chief Shahrizal Shaari. If this is not Umno’s official support of the Red Shirts, why were these Unmo officials with the rabble rousers?
Jamal says there wouldn’t be a Red Shirts movement if not for Bersih, the coalition for free and fair elections.”Our intention is not violence, no matter what happens…”If there is no yellow (Bersih), there would be no red. So long as there is yellow, so long as there is Bersih, we’ll be around,” he said.
Red Shirts do this, Red Shirts do that.
Why are we tolerating gangsters?
Why, Mr IGP?
if it is true that the yellow shirts, malaysiakini and bar council have received funding support from the jews, then the malays/muslims should strongly support the red shirts.
ReplyDeletesupport gangsters?
Deletetreachery vs thuggery - take your side?
Deletetreachery needs to be proven, thuggery has been proven, wakakaka
Deleteare you suggesting that we should wait until our country is ruled by the jews by proxy, perhaps like our neighbour? ha ha
DeleteAnd likewise KT, lechery has been proven too, wakakaka.
Deletewakakaka also Bro Hasan
DeleteUnknown, our neighbour ain't doing too badly, wakakaka
Deletehmmm no comment on that thief behind the thug? tok kok aje pandai.
ReplyDeleteCan zombies have inbred selective inclination?
ReplyDeleteFunding support from the Jews is treachery, while funding support from the Arab is not!
Both also foreign entities mah.
Masuk akal ke????
hello.. zionists killing palestinians/muslims in gaza including many women, children, and the elderly, none of whom were zombies.. oh itu boleh diterima akal ke? ha ha
DeleteMuslims also kill muslims in gaza including many women, children, and the elderly, too.
DeletePerbuatan zombies, betul tak??
Itulah yang tak masuk akal minda orang lain.
Zombies tak bolih fikir. Otak tak ada lah! Faham tak?
Talking about selection bias! Actually they could be just blind you know, like the guy staring sideway but actually was looking straight at you! So you thought they actually saw Syria's refugees vis-a-vis the rich Arab nations like Saudi etc
Deletehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/09/04/the-arab-worlds-wealthiest-nations-are-doing-next-to-nothing-for-syrias-refugees/
Zionists killing palestinians/muslims in gaza was wrong but your fellow rich and who can afford muslims and nearer and faster to extend help actually were "indirectly trying to kill" them too!
it's well published in the western news, that Saudi and egyptian Intelligence works closely with Mossad to suppress the Palestinians, Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and other Muslim rebel groups
DeleteThe Saudis fear republican Muslim groups, seeing them as threats to Saudi royalty.
Those who worry about being ruled by Jews by proxy may want to reflect on this....
ReplyDeleteYour beloved Najib is , or at least was in lying the same bed with a Chinapek by the name of Jho Low, and an American corporation called Goldman Sachs.
It will be good for the education of Melayu dudes to know about the origin of the surname "Goldman".
For centuries, up to quite late, just a couple of hundred years ago, it was considered morally wrong for European Christians to levy usury or interest ("riba" in Arabic) on other Christians. So most European Christians stayed away from the money lending or financing business. Jews had no such hang-ups about lending to Gentiles , or non-Jews. So, in Europe, when Kings and other nobility needed to raise finance or borrow money, they went to Jewish moneylenders...who grew very rich in the process.
The name "Goldman" basically means the person's ancestry was literally a Gold-man i.e. a man you went to , for borrowing Gold , money, financing. Most of these family businesses lasted for many generations.
Goldman Sachs is today a public company incorporated on the New York Stock Exchange, but it is still largely owned and controlled by Jewish shareholders, most of whom are also extremely, extremely Pro-Israel.
Hey....as it is obvious on Ktemoc's blog I'm not anti-Israel or anti-Jewish, but its worth educating all these Melayu dudes on what kind of people their UMNO top leadership lies down to fornicate with.