Thursday, May 23, 2019

Affordable education - shooting fish in a barrel

From Malaysiakini:

Race quotas affect us all

Ikmal Rozlan  |  Published:   |  Modified: 
Getting affordable education as a Malay is like shooting fish in a barrel. Getting affordable education as a non-Malay is like shooting at that same barrel but with a bulletproof-glass lid. While Malaysia is still a long way from having free education, public universities and other state-funded tertiary education institutions in the country are still considered as being affordable and having one of the lowest tuition fees in the world due to government subsidies. 

Be that as it may, a caveat of this system is that most state-funded institutions have a fixed intake quota set in favour of bumiputera citizens, those legally considered to be descendants of the indigenous peoples of the Malay world. This system, by virtue of the NEP, has been a controversial issue for decades, becoming a visceral touching point for both citizens and politicians and once again floating in the zeitgeist due to the government’s recent decision to not change the 90:10 quota, but instead increase the number of overall seats in the matriculation programme.
On average, the cost of an undergraduate degree in a Malaysian public university rarely exceeds RM30,000, which is why placement in these institutions is highly sought after. One way to almost guarantee a spot is to go through a pre-university course called matriculation. The matriculation programme, which provides a diploma-level certificate in either science, accounting or technical subjects, is highly coveted by those looking for an affordable route to higher education. 
The one-year course only costs RM580 after subsidies and students even receive a significant monthly stipend. This makes the programme especially coveted by the B40, the economic group categorised by the government as having a household income less than the national median. Notwithstanding the affordability of public education, many non-bumiputera students in the B40 group are cast aside due to the rigorous quota system and are left to either take out an extensive loan for a private college, which many are not able to afford, or put their education on hold and start working at low-income jobs until they have saved up enough money, if ever.
Since the change of government in 2018, many had hoped that the quota for the matriculation programme would be adjusted to accommodate marginalised B40 Chinese and Indians. Alas, the prime minister announced that instead of decreasing the 90 percent quota for bumiputera students, they would instead increase the number of slots by 60 percent, thus increasing non-bumiputera seats from 2,500 to 4,000. While this seems like a step in the right direction, conversely, the decision takes two steps backwards as it could have adverse impacts on all stakeholders, bumiputera or otherwise.
As the programme is heavily subsidised by the government, an increase in seats means that the programme is now 60 percent more expensive for government coffers, not to mention having to allocate more seats in public universities for said students; an ostensibly irresponsible decision considering how the new government has been expounding non-stop rhetoric about the dire state of the country’s financial debt since its takeover. The additional seats also lead to a higher student-faculty ratio, increasing the workload for lecturers and giving them less time and opportunity to focus on each individual student, which could consequently lead to a drop in the quality of education. 
Furthermore, the student body is also affected as a higher number of students means that competition is tougher and more stressful due to the fact that the aforementioned near-guaranteed ticket for public university placement is diluted as these institutions would not be able to afford opening allocations for the overflow of matriculation graduates.
It is a ubiquitous Malaysian story - many Chinese and Indian parents have experienced their straight-As children being denied placement in the matriculation programme while discovering that many Malays with subpar grades being accepted. The standard of acceptance for Malay students is now likely to lower due to the extra 15,000 seats. This not only diminishes the concept of meritocracy in academia but is also an affront to the self-dignity of the Malays. 
A quota system favouring the Malays implies that Malays are lesser and not able to perform outstandingly on their own effort, indignation overlooked by those who are for the system whom often pressure dissidents to stay reticent through political rhetoric.
Staunch supporters of the quota system often disregard the fact that the taxes that fund these institutions are contributed by citizens of all races. The concept of public education is to provide equity for the poor, racial discrimination only negates the effects and keeps the vulnerable demographic stagnant. Opportunities should be afforded to all and only those with merit should be rewarded, that is a universal truth. 
Understandably, the government is not able to ignore those who are able to vote them out of power and make drastic changes overnight. Changing a public mindset takes time, effort and amicable understanding but for that to occur, communication is key; the public must be allowed to discuss these issues out in the open, without interference from the powers-that-be, which at the moment, are the biggest bulwark.


  1. Fair is fair. Private sector favour Cina. Govt sector favour Melayu.

    Like these "Freedom Swimmers"
    who risked drowning to escape rule by fellow Cinatocks, in order to live under Orang Putih rule.

    Cina here are descendants of those who prefer to be ruled by non-Cina, first Putih, then Melayu. You complain apa?

    Cina don't like to be ruled by Cina. Otherwise they wouldn't be in non-Cina ruled countries and continue to refuse to balik Tiongfuckingcock.

    1. we complain when the ruler is a liar, thief n robber. u tak apa is yr problem, we r diff.

    2. Your nenek moyang approach to such a ruler is to leave, go to a non-Cina ruled country, then produce cucu-cicit who then complain about the ruler their forebears voted for with their feet.

      Bahlul punya Cina.

    3. What about yr nenek moyang approaches?

      How many time u have turned the pages of yr copy of Sulalatus Salatin?

      Wakakakakaka…… lagi teruk! Betul tak, otakrosak?

    4. our nenek moyang approach is to kick the ruler out. we kiss hand no more.

      cucu cicit now choose to live under a democracy, so we can fuck n oust the liar thief n robber from time to time.

  2. "A quota system favouring the Malays implies that Malays are lesser and not able to perform outstandingly on their own effort, indignation overlooked by those who are for the system whom often pressure dissidents to stay reticent through political rhetoric."

    Really funny bullshit.

    Sons of Cina bosses of even publicly listed companies don't mind being favoured by their fathers when inheriting their posts...even ahem...cough.. spreadsheet enhanced political parties ... cough ... cough..

    Pure Cina bullshitting...

  3. The Race/Native (Malay/Bumiputera) Quota allowed for in the Constitution as a temporary affirmative quota has been so abused by UMNO and the BN Govt. to fit their philosophy of Ketuanan Melayu that it has now become:

    1. Quotas ratio so unreasonable as to become a blatant racist quota to suppressed other races for equal rights as citizens even after the initial disparities and handicaps have been reduced dramatically over the past 60+ years.

    2. The thinking that it is a perpetual quota based solely on race considerations across all sectors when it should be based on needs and limited to sectors where affirmative actions is still required to address social justice.

    3. The abuse of such quotas by those undeserving, rich and powerful to hop onto the bandwagon of affirmative priviledges due to wanton greed and at the expense of other citizens who really are in dire need of those affirmative quotas to also have social justice as citizens.

    And thus today, instead of the aims of Social Justice in the spirit of The Constitution drafted by all our forefathers, we have instead have it substituted with blatant Ketuanan Melayu quotas cheered on by those with wanton Greed.

  4. "Alas, the prime minister announced that instead of decreasing the 90 percent quota for bumiputera students"

    Oh! really did the PM announced that? You are really ingenious to pass off such accusation as truth in your writing. This is not the same KTemoc as the old who called a spade a spade, wakakakaka .........

  5. i dun believe private firm require mandarin fluency. the reason they prefer chinese is because most outstanding malay rather choose to work with govt n glc. even if a malay is hired, the moment he got an offer from govt n glc, he will leave.

    but i somehow agree many firm discriminate against indian, one strong reason or excuse is u rarely win a debate or argument against a indian, n most indian never back down in a debate or argument, unlike lks wakaka.

  6. If Mandarin as a requirement is made out to be as discriminating against Malays or Indians (which is a perception), it doesn't show reality when on the ground with most Malaysian Chinese in the domestic maids, construction, farming, food, retail, fishing, estates, repair services, entertainment, tourism, transportation etc hiring lots of non-chinese as their employees compared to Malaysian Chinese.

    So those who continue perpetuating such perceptions as facts are definitely not living in Malaysia or are cocooned living in only among their community blind to these realities.

    1. Including those cinapek apologists who tried very hard to look fair in their bleedingheart-ish way!

      A sign of terminal sinoapoligistis!