Saturday, June 29, 2019

PH govt fails minimum standards of justice, impartiality and integrity

Extracts from FMT:

Is Pakatan Harapan committed to human rights?

It’s been more than a year since our “new” government came to power. I was there outside the gates of Istana Negara, alongside thousands of other excited Malaysians, waiting for Dr Mahathir Mohamad to be sworn in as prime minister that May night. There was so much hope and excitement that we had finally turned the page on decades of corruption, the abuse of power and disrespect for human rights.
Mahathir later captured that sense of excitement and hope in his UN speech when he said that Malaysians want a nation that “will firmly espouse” the principles promoted by the UN including “truth, human rights, the rule of law, justice, fairness.” And then he gave a pledge to an admiring world that the new government of Malaysia would “ratify all remaining core UN instruments related to the protection of human rights”.
What a disappointing year it has been! Hope is now turning to despair. Today, it’s hard to even imagine that some of these Pakatan Harapan (PH) politicians were the same ones who campaigned last year on a platform of democratic transformation.
During the election campaign (and in its manifesto), PH politicians repeatedly pledged to repeal oppressive, anti-democratic legislation that had been introduced over the years essentially to keep Umno-BN in power. Several PH politicians were themselves victimised and incarcerated by Umno-BN under these laws.
It didn’t take them long, however, to renege on these promises. In office, they suddenly became defenders of the very laws they once opposed. Even Communications and Multimedia Minister Gobind Singh Deo, once fearless in his opposition against all things undemocratic, became a defender of the status quo. He was quoted as saying (in January this year) that the government chose to lift a freeze on several controversial security laws because there is “concern over the threat to national security, public order and race relations.”
How many times have we heard Umno-BN politicians offer the same excuses to justify laws that ought to have no place in any democracy worthy of its name?
Of course, Umno like, he also sought to reassure the public that the government will only use these laws “in exceptional” cases, but don’t these PH politicians realise that the issue is about putting an end to such anti-democratic legislation so that no government, present or future, will ever be able to terrorise the people again the way Umno-BN did?
And enough has been said about their spineless retreat on ICERD and ICC. So much for solemn pledges.
Earlier this week, we were also treated to yet another example of our new government’s utter disdain for human rights and justice. After stonewalling and dragging their feet for months, the home minister finally announced the formation of a rather nebulous “task force” to look into the enforced disappearances of Amri Che Mat and Pastor Raymond Koh.
Shockingly, the task force was stacked heavy with former police and government officials despite the fact that the Suhakam enquiry clearly implicated the police in the disappearances. There wasn’t even the pretence of impartiality and independence. Even the choice to head the task force immediately set off alarm bells.
And yet the prime minister summarily dismissed these concerns with an offhand remark that “we cannot please everyone.” It’s not about pleasing anyone; it’s about meeting minimum standards of justice, impartiality and integrity without which any investigation is meaningless.
Is this an effort to bury the truth or uncover it? If the families of Amri and Koh can’t find justice in Malaysia Baru, all the talk about reform and change means nothing.


  1. DAP winning is the best thing to happen to DAP's enemies. When DAP becomes opposition again, what is their platform?

    DAP will eventually need their own version of Pribumi. A new party for its members to join when they lose so they can repeat the slogans of the original DAP without sounding too two-faced.

    Learn from the mamak how to disown past actions.

    1. Another idea for DAP.

      When DAP realizes PH is going to lose, it should pick any Cina or human rights issue to argue with it's Malay masters about.

      Don't compromise, then leave PH "over principles" before the elections ...ahem...

      If this doesn't work, can always fall back on the new party solution like I mentioned.

  2. Wakakakakakaakaka

    I wonder whether TDM will even allow any more credible opposition parties to survive for the next 10-20 years after he has built his Kingdom.

    Of course, those parties and warlords who have betrayed him would not even be alive to see his Kingdom he has built anew. These ignoramus can continue to be Mat Jenins just like some of the commentators who continue to believe in illusions of a past Malaccan Sultanate or the birth of an Islamic State.


    1. You actually mean Klingdom: they eat their fallen enemies....