Malaysiakini - Ngeh: Resignation letters valid - however, Perak DAP chairperson Ngeh Koo Ham said the resignation letters by the two previously MIA PKR duo are kosher, regardless of what they are saying now, and that the speaker (of the Perak state assembly) has already accepted the letters as legal documents.
Before I come to the question of who is right and wrong, I must ask whether Perak DUN speaker V Sivakumar had, on receiving the two faxes, made an effort to contact the two PKR ADUNs to confirm that they had really resigned?
… or he just made accepted the canned resignations (regardless of who sent them) and on that basis, declared to the EC the two state constituencies are now without representations and therefore require by-elections ...
... with somewhat perceived indecent haste?
Legally, are the resignations still valid when the two persons who signed them said they didn’t resign at all, and in fact are still serving as the ADUNs for their constituencies?
Or, can the speaker ignore their personal and public declarations and insist on accepting the faxes as the far superior intent?
Ngeh has virtually said 'yes' to the above queries.But even as a layperson, I reckon ADUN speaker V Sivakumar is skating on thin ice here.
Meanwhile the King of Frogs (as Koh Tsu Koon called the Defacto Defective Deformer wakakaka), just like the little boy who didn’t want to play football anymore after being nicely trounced by the other village boys, wanted to take his ball home and cry to mama. He, the King of Bull-frogs, had the brazen shameless cheek to blame Najib for the PKR wannabe frogs as if he's lily-white in the slime shit business.
As if that wasn’t hypocritical enough, he also lambasted AAB for the immorality of hinting of froggie flow the other way.
Brahma was out-frogged every which way. Aiyoh, how to be PM if he can’t even manage such a small deformasi? Well, is he gonna run to the Turkish Embassy and claim he’s being targeted for assassination?
Meanwhile the pathetic pundee piffling pariah piranhas blasted the PKR tadpoles with their full wrath, which of course they denied the real frog Nasarudin. Instead they lavished the Bota frog with high praises of political enlightenment and commendable social morality for doing what the two PKR tadpoles haven’t quite done yet - wakakakakaka.
What brazen bullshit bodoh hypocrisy.
Then, the usual weaponry by a particular political party made its entrance at a timely moment, in the form of the much abused and misused Statutory Declaration wakakakakaka as reported in Malaysiakini 'Najib promised RM50mil for defections'.
Looks like PKR has resorted to throwing even the kitchen sink.
Two, sorry, three reasons why I don’t believe it:
(a) Why make the Stat Dec now and not earlier, like at the Permatang Pauh or even the KT by-elections. In fact the Permatang Pauh by-election would have badly needed this juicy information and put it to good use. Instead the party had to recruit, resource and rely on poor Ramlang Porigi who subsequently lost his public servant job for campaigning for a political party.
(b) The staggering implausible sum, which after some hesitation the author reduced to just RM5 million (a far more plausible sum).
(c) It’s made by a PKR bloke wakakakakakakakakaka - who the f* would believe him other than other PKR people or supporters ;-)
I see Mr Deformasi has even dug up the sorry tale of the missing private investigator Bala, resorting to the doctrine of ‘flinging poo and hoping some will somehow stick somewhere, anywhere’ when in dire circumstances.
I have my own opinion of why Bala disappeared – I would ask ‘Cui Bono’ (who profits) regarding Bala’s mysterious disappearance, and ponder on the most likely political beneficiary of the scandal.
Surely not Najib.
If not Najib, then who could have paid or persuaded Bala to deliberately made two conflicting Stat Decs, ...
... remembering that the second one had been made after he visited the police station, implausibly WITHOUT being accompanied by any lawyer, and then mysteriously f* off conveniently, leaving of course Najib with a lot of questions to answer, a ‘mystery’ to explain and a blame/stigma to carry.
But in the end, I ask – who was the rear end orifice who started the whole sorry froggie business to subvert the ballot box? Whose trademark or modus operandi was, has been and now still is the shonky crass shit of encouraging, enticing and egging political defections for his benefit?