Friday, July 09, 2021

Hong Kong police arrest two suspected of inciting others via social media to commit murder, arson targeting officers

SCMP:

Hong Kong police arrest two suspected of inciting others via social media to commit murder, arson targeting officers

Arrests come days after 50-year-old man stabbed police officer in back before fatally plunging knife into his own chest

Police decline to say whether pair’s case is linked to July 1 attack, but note comments were posted a day after the incident



Police have arrested two people accused of inciting others to commit arson and murder officers. 
Photo: Warton Li

A man and a woman suspected of using social media to incite others to set fire to Hong Kong police stations and murder officers were arrested on Sunday, just days after a 50-year-old man stabbed a constable in the back before fatally plunging the knife into his own chest.

While police declined to say whether the pair’s case was believed to be linked to the attack on July 1, they noted the “abusive comments and inciting messages” were allegedly posted by the 20-year-old woman and 26-year-old man on two unspecified social media platforms a day after the incident.

“The investigation is still under way, and police will not rule out further arrests,” said Superintendent Wilson Tam Wai-shun, who did not disclose the number of messages posted, but stressed the seriousness of their content.

According to a source, the man worked in advertising, while the woman was a student. They were accused of making the offending posts on the encrypted messaging app Telegram and the local online forum LIHKG, both popular among protesters during the
2019 social unrest.



Police investigate the stabbing of an officer in Causeway Bay on July 1 by a man who then turned the knife on himself. Photo: Reuters

The arrests came as police said on Sunday that a preliminary investigation suggested the assailant in the “lone-wolf” knife attack last week had been “radicalised by myriad fake information”.

The force added that its national security unit had been put in charge of the case.

Sunday’s arrests, however, were not made under the Beijing-imposed national security law, but rather under the city’s criminal code. The two stand accused of sedition, and inciting others to commit murder and arson.

Tam also noted a court injunction was in place forbidding threatening police officers and maliciously exposing their personal information – a practice known as doxxing.

In a televised interview on Sunday, former security minister and new Chief Secretary John Lee Ka-chiu warned of the dangers of people using their frustration towards the government to justify what police had dubbed an “act of domestic terrorism”, noting the potential for unpredictable copycat attacks.

“This time, it happened to a police officer. Next time it could happen to other citizens,” Lee said of the stabbing.

“Acts of terrorism should not be accepted by anyone. If we have problems, we talk it out.”

Police this year barred the city’s annual July 1 protest – which traditionally coincides with the anniversary of its return to China – citing public health grounds.

But the relative calm that day was shattered when the attacker stabbed a police officer in the back in Causeway Bay, puncturing his lung, before killing himself. As of Saturday morning, the officer was in a stable condition after undergoing two surgeries.

A police spokesman on Sunday said the case had been referred to the national security unit the day before, and urged people to come forward to provide information.

“Police’s initial investigation revealed that this was a lone wolf-style act of domestic terrorism in which the attacker was believed to have been radicalised by myriad fake information, but we will not rule out any possibilities,” he said, without revealing the nature of the material in question. He added the unit would look into whether the man was incited or supported by others.

Simon Young Ngai-man, a law professor at the University of Hong Kong, explained that prosecutors did not need to establish a message had directly led to an act to prove an incitement charge. As long as the author of the message had intended for the act to take place, and the perpetrator of the act had seen the message, that would be enough to constitute incitement.

“With the incitement offence, there need not be causation,” he said.

Incitement could also be prosecuted even if the crime being encouraged did not take place, Young added. The offending message only needed to be considered “reasonably capable of persuading someone to commit the act”, he said.



Chief Secretary John Lee attends a ceremony marking the 24th anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to China last Thursday. Photo: Reuters

In his interview, Lee also said the government was still looking at ways to stymie the spread of so-called fake news – which it has blamed in part for the 2019 anti-government protests – including by prosecuting those who disseminated it under a law that was currently being considered.

Lee said authorities aimed to target offending content rather than platforms, but would not rule out the possibility of a licensing system for media outlets under the proposed legislation, saying: “I would not make any conclusion at this stage.”

Since Thursday’s attack, some residents have visited the location to lay flowers in memory of the assailant, and accused police of thwarting their commemorations by throwing away the tributes. Police have defended their approach, saying the acts incited further hatred.



Police stop a man carrying flowers in Causeway Bay near where an officer was stabbed on Thursday. Photo: Xiaomei Chen

New police commissioner Raymond Siu Chak-yee said on Sunday that he had noticed comments online calling for violence against officers over the past few days.

“Whether you are the one carrying out the attack, or whether you are just behind the scenes inciting others to commit such a serious case, it is a very serious act and we will resolutely take enforcement action,” he said.

Siu also explained the stabbing case had been taken over by national security police because it was being treated as an act of terrorism, while warning people not to glorify the attack or mourn the assailant.

“We cannot allow such behaviour because it aims to incite hatred against police and split up society,” he said. “These activities can also affect public security and public order.”

Chief Secretary Lee on Sunday stopped short of saying such mourning was illegal, but denounced it as morally indefensible, adding those who took part disregarded the potential ramifications of endorsing acts of terrorism.

“One cannot underestimate [terrorism’s] ability to spread and proliferate,” he said, pointing to attacks overseas. “On a moral level, society should criticise its incorrectness.”

Responding to critics’ arguments that the government’s own missteps had given rise to the situation, Lee allowed there was room for the administration to improve, but urged the public to instead join in sensible discussions.

He said Beijing’s recent overhaul of the city’s electoral system – which vastly reduced the number of directly elected representatives in the legislature and granted new powers to an establishment-dominated Election Committee – had made the atmosphere more conducive to such discussions.

He added that local bodies such as district-level crime-fighting committees – which were given seats on the Election Committee under the overhaul – could help residents channel their views to the government.


29 comments:

  1. "Police stop a man carrying flowers in Causeway Bay near where an officer was stabbed"

    Looks like the once highly respected Hong King Police have become as stupid as PDRM under UMNO , which arrested people who lit candles in sympathy for ISA detainees.

    Moronic

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't kerbau lah, pray tell how is it that ISA detainees is equivalent to the moronic, senseless, cruel attempt to murder by stabbing a policeman? What did the ISA detainees do? Did they destroy public properties? (If they did they also deserve to be arrested) Did they harass and attack people who disagree with them? (If they did they also deserve to be arrested) You are just twisting the comparison.

      Delete
    2. You are comparing only based in your point of view.

      I won't try to defend PDRM, but from PDRM point of view , the ISA detainees were dangerous threats to National Security. No doubt some of them may actually be dangerous.

      Sounds very familiar, just like Hong Kong police.

      Delete
    3. In the ISA cases government cannot produce any proof. Technically, though it is also factually, honestly and truly, no conviction and not guilty of anything. That why LKS, LGE & Tian Chua were not disqualify for standing for election. One is support the guilty, the other is support the not guilty. This is same ah?

      Delete
  2. Bully Grandma Wong. Like in Malaysia polis arrest her simply for flying a flag. What law did she break for doing that?

    QUOTE
    Missing Hong Kong protester Alexandra Wong 'was held in mainland China'
    17 October 2020

    Alexandra Wong: "I won't give up fighting"

    A prominent Hong Kong protester has made her first public appearance in 14 months, telling the media she had been held in mainland China.
    Alexandra Wong, 64, was nicknamed "Grandma Wong" and was often pictured waving a British flag at protests.

    She said she was detained last August in the border city of Shenzhen and forced to renounce her activism in writing.

    Ms Wong said she was also sent on a "patriotic tour" of Shaanxi province.
    UNQUOTE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Missing Hong Kong protester Alexandra Wong 'was held in mainland China'"

      Blurred mfer don't u realised that the last time this deranged old pommie lover is still waving her beloved pommie flag on her lone protest on 30 May 2020.

      What an opened lie by a blurred f*ck.

      This old fool is just a fame seeker. What a concocted story of "detained last August in the border city of Shenzhen" & "sent on a "patriotic tour" of Shaanxi province"!

      To tell the truth, if this old pommie lover dares to chant her pommie jingo & carrying a pommie flag in Shenzhen, she would be laying in the hospital since she open her jingo song!

      Delete
  3. After HK, China is tightening control in Macau. It has now barred 21 opposition members from standing for the legislative election in September.

    One cannot blame China for its efforts to rein in democratic tendencies especially in HK. I believe China learnt a lesson from Taiwan that if left too long on its own, the Hong Kongers will entertain thoughts of independence.

    The way I see it, the younger Taiwanese generation will have had no emotional longing to be reunited with the motherland. These young Taiwanese would have been brought up simply as Taiwanese.

    Thus, I expect China to up its pressure on Taiwan. And China has repeatedly said it was willing to force reunification by military means if necessary and damn the consequences.

    The world will be in deep s**t when that happens. To add to the already volatile situation the US is obliged to defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "US is obliged to defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack"

      Wakakakaka…

      What did that sleepy biden said about defending Taiwan?

      Not even anywhere near the latest withdrawal from Afghanistan!

      Those meme-ed Formosa 台毒 should just migrate away from Taiwan where they love if the land is superfluously fraud.

      Delete
  4. Kerajaan Bullyland becoming like Malay-sia, so zalim, arrest civilians for flying flags, carrying flowers, wearing black, holding candles..... what next....?

    QUOTE
    ‘Unreasonable’ to arrest Hongkongers wearing black or holding candles, says Tiananmen Massacre vigil organiser

    Over 1,000 anti-riot officers will be deployed to patrol the area around Victoria Park on Friday, local media reported.

    by RHODA KWAN
    2 JUNE 2021

    Organisers of Hong Kong’s banned Tiananmen Massacre vigil have said it would be “unreasonable” to arrest people based on their clothing. It follows local media reports that people wearing black, holding candles or chanting slogans near Victoria Park this Friday may be arrested for participating in an unauthorised assembly.

    “It’s not reasonable at all,” the group’s vice-chair Chow Hang-tung told HKFP on Wednesday. “[People] should be able to wear what they want… or to hold a candle on the streets – that can’t be illegal.”

    “These things should not be against the law just because we made an application for an assembly,” Chow continued.

    Over 1,000 anti-riot officers will be deployed to patrol the area around Victoria Park on Friday, the reports suggest. Police presence across the city will also be strengthened, despite the long history of peaceful gatherings on the anniversary.

    Black-clad people found in the vicinity of Victoria Park risk being charged with participating in an unauthorised assembly, while other vigils held around the city may violate the four-person limit on social gatherings during Covid-19, reports said. Officers may also make video recordings in the area and take action at a later date.
    UNQUOTE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blurred mfer, anyone been arrested during that twisted Tiananmen vigil in Victoria park?

      U?

      Delete
    2. Stop perpetuating the western evil lie of Tiananmen Massacre you blind western worshipper. There was no Tiananmen Massacre. All these Black-clad people found in the vicinity of Victoria Park are just the same, blind silly western worshippers, promoting and perpetuating the evil western lie. They deserve to be condemned.

      Delete
    3. The Tiananmen Massacre was real.
      The People's Liberation Army turned on The People with Tanks and Machine Guns.

      It is the rule of the Chinese Communist Party which is founded on lies.
      Abetted by Commie worshipers.

      Delete
    4. As been told ad nauseam by the western propagandas & demoNcratic as slicking mfers, like u!

      Again, abetted by who?

      Delete
    5. You mean all these your most trustable western media all lied?

      QUOTE:
      “As far as can be determined from the available evidence, NO ONE DIED that night in Tiananmen Square.” What?! Who would make such a blatant propagandist claim? China’s communist party? Nope. It was Jay Mathews, who was Washington Post’s Beijing Bureau Chief in 1989. He wrote this for Columbia Journalism Review.

      Here are a few more examples of what western journalists once said about what happened in Tiananmen Square in June 1989:

      CBS NEWS: “We saw no bodies, injured people, ambulances or medical personnel — in short, nothing to even suggest, let alone prove, that a “massacre” had occurred in [Tiananmen Square]” — thus wrote CBS News reporter Richard Roth.

      BBC NEWS: “I was one of the foreign journalists who witnessed the events that night. There was no massacre on Tiananmen Square” — BBC reporter, James Miles, wrote in 2009.

      NY TIMES: In June 13, 1989, NY Times reporter Nicholas Kristof – who was in Beijing at that time – wrote, “State television has even shown film of students marching peacefully away from the [Tiananmen] square shortly after dawn as proof that they [protesters] were not slaughtered.” In that article, he also debunked an unidentified student protester who had claimed in a sensational article that Chinese soldiers with machine guns simply mowed down peaceful protesters in Tiananmen Square.

      1/2

      Delete
    6. 2/2 continued

      REUTERS: Graham Earnshaw was in the Tiananmen Square on the night of June 3. He didn’t leave the square until the morning of June 4th. He wrote in his memoir that the military came, negotiated with the students and made everyone (including himself) leave peacefully; and that nobody died in the square.

      But did people die in China? Yes, about 200-300 people died in clashes in various parts of Beijing, around June 4 — and about half of those who died were soldiers and cops.

      WIKILEAKS: A Wikileaks cable from the US Embassy in Beijing (sent in July 1989) also reveals the eyewitness accounts of a Latin American diplomat and his wife: “They were able to enter and leave the [Tiananmen] square several times and were not harassed by troops. Remaining with students … until the final withdrawal, the diplomat said there were no mass shootings in the square or the monument.”

      And blah blah blah ........
      UNQUOTE

      https://worldaffairs.blog/2019/06/02/tiananmen-square-massacre-facts-fiction-and-propaganda/

      Delete
    7. And you are a racist. What is wrong with a communist. They don't behave like those hypocrite people who accused others for genocide when in truth they were the real culprits such as your beloved Americans, Canadian and the Australians. Chinese Communist Party didn't lie, you did!

      Delete
    8. Peter is a Commie LIAR

      This is James Miles actial words.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8057762.stm


      Page last updated at 12:25 GMT, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 13:25 UK
      E-mail this to a friend Printable version
      Tiananmen killings: Were the media right?
      Reports of the pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Square and their violent end have had a huge impact on how the outside world sees China. James Miles - who was the BBC's Beijing correspondent at the time - reflects on the difficulties of covering the story.

      Pro-democracy demonstration by Chinese students in Tiananmen Square in May 1989
      The massacre was the culmination of weeks of student-led demonstrations
      The first draft of history can be crude. Even if the thrust of a story is well described by journalists on the scene, some of its details might need refinement, and sometimes even correction.

      Such was the case with the massacre in Beijing on 3 and 4 June, 1989. I was one of the foreign journalists who witnessed the events that night.

      We got the story generally right, but on one detail I and others conveyed the wrong impression. There was no massacre on Tiananmen Square.

      Looking back at the radio despatches I filed for the BBC, the following words stand out from a draft script that I sat down to write back in the office at 0230 on 4 June: "Around two in the morning, troops using armoured personnel carriers crashed through barricades set up by residents on the outskirts of the square.

      "Eyewitnesses said thousands of troops later poured into the square, firing as they advanced. Tens of thousands of students and workers crouched in the centre of the square."


      The Chinese government was quick to exploit the weaknesses in our reporting
      Scripts are often revised by hand at the last minute in the studio, but the actual words as broadcast probably did not differ considerably from these.

      Towards midday on 4 June, amid reports of widespread casualties, I wrote in another draft that "many of the deaths occurred at Tiananmen Square, not only from gunshots, but also from being crushed by tanks, which ploughed relentlessly through any obstacle in their way."

      Reports by other foreign journalists conveyed a similar impression. "Death in Tiananmen; Witnesses Describe the Devastating Assault" said a Washington Post headline on 5 June.

      Credible reports

      Evidence of a massacre having occurred in Beijing was incontrovertible.

      Chinese army tanks guard the strategic Chang'an avenue leading to Tiananmen square (6 June 1989) Manuel Ceneta/AFP
      Troops fired at unarmed citizens on the strategic Chang'an Boulevard
      Numerous foreign journalists saw it from widely scattered vantage points.

      On the morning of 4 June, reporters in the Beijing Hotel close to the square saw troops open fire indiscriminately at unarmed citizens on Chang'an Boulevard who were too far away from the soldiers to pose any real threat.

      Thirty or 40 bodies lay, apparently lifeless, on the road afterwards.

      That scene outside the Beijing Hotel alone justified the use of the word massacre. But the students who had told me and other journalists of a bloodbath on the square proved mistaken.

      Protesters who were still in the square when the army reached it were allowed to leave after negotiations with martial law troops (Only a handful of journalists were on hand to witness this moment - I, like most others at the time, had spent the night in various different parts of the city monitoring the army's bloody advance).

      A few of the students were crushed by armoured vehicles some distance from the square after the retreat.

      There were credible reports of several citizens being shot dead during the night on the outer perimeter of the square, but in places which strictly speaking could be said to be outside the square itself.

      But we are far less certain of killings on Tiananmen proper. There were probably few, if any

      Delete
    9. Peter thinks Communism is a Race.
      What a Moron.

      Delete
    10. Old moneyed mfer have u checked the facts from both sides?

      U believe those lies yet u ignore the facts as written in

      https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB16/index.html

      Tiananmen Square, 1989: The Declassified History
      Edited By Jeffrey T. Richelson and Michael L. Evans

      The book has disputed many points raised by BBC/James Miles & the massacre propagated by Times reporter Nicholas Kristof!

      Creditable reports?

      Only from the side that u loved.

      How convenient!

      Delete
    11. Maybe u do think demoNcracy is the best god given gift to humanity!

      What a know-nothing idiot!

      Delete
    12. This is James Miles actial words. . . . REVISED on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 13:25 UK

      Actual event date June 3 and June 4, 1989

      And in his revision he added "But we are far less certain of killings on Tiananmen proper. There were probably few, if any"

      What about CBS NEWS, NY TIMES, REUTERS, WIKILEAKS which reported there was no massacre on Tiananmen Square?

      China has banned BBC World News from broadcasting in the country, its television and radio regulator announced on Thursday because BBC has been habitually making false reports smearing China.

      Obviously you would believe only BBC and not the rest, you cannot handle the truth ???

      Delete
    13. An extract from the Wikipedia on Racism :

      "In terms of political systems (e.g., apartheid) that support the expression of prejudice or aversion in discriminatory practices or laws, racist ideology may include associated social aspects such as nativism, xenophobia, otherness, segregation, hierarchical ranking, and supremacism."

      Perhaps I should re-phrase my words : You behave like a racist!

      Is that better?

      Delete
  5. Chairman Mao's Cultural Revolution (formally known as the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution) was a violent socio-political purge movement in China from 1966 until Mao Zedong's death in 1976. Launched by Mao Zedong, Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and founder of the People's Republic of China (PRC), its stated goal was to preserve Chinese communism by purging remnants of capitalist and traditional elements from Chinese society, and to re-impose Mao Zedong Thought (known outside China as Maoism) as the dominant ideology in the PRC. The Revolution marked Mao's return to the central position of power in China after a period of less radical leadership to recover from the failures of the Great Leap Forward, which contributed to the Great Chinese Famine only five years prior.

    Today the Modern Mao, wearing Modern Mao Suit on CCP's 100'th birthday, is unleashing a similar Cultural Revolution in helpless HongKong, wanting to wipe out all memories of 150 years of Britannia Rule. No grateful gratitude for the critical role HongKongers played in decades helping the mainland countryside of turnip pullers and donkey slappers become a global superpower today.

    In 1997 (handover) Hongkong's GDP was 18% of China's, even though its population was less than 1% of China's.

    In 2018 Hongkong's GDP was only 2.8% of China's. So Hongkongers can be forgotten. Treat them like trash.

    Like in Malay-sia today, the contribution of Chinese and Indians of the early 20th century can be forgotten. Treat them like trash.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep repeating yr f*cking lies lah, blurred mfer!

      This is the age of internet where info is no longer monopolized & dictated by insidious & contemptible Myers, like u.

      Eat yr heart out!

      Delete
  6. The Cultural Revolution of Hong Kong has started. Purging of Western Capitalism and the Total Adoption of the New Maoism.

    Love Your Country = Love Your CCP Leaders.

    QUOTE
    China’s Communist Party emerges from shadows during HK crackdown
    AFP -July 10, 2021

    HONG KONG: China’s Communist Party has abandoned its tradition of working from the shadows in Hong Kong as authorities pursue a sweeping crackdown on critics and remould the financial hub in the mainland’s authoritarian image. While Hong Kong was returned by colonial Britain in 1997, Beijing has historically been wary about making the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) too visible in a city where many hail from families who fled the worst excesses of its rule.

    “There were a few reasons for the CCP to be kept out of sight,” political analyst Willy Lam told AFP. “The CCP was associated with a series of horrendous mistakes including the Cultural Revolution, the three years of famine and so forth.”

    Beijing’s quiet support for leftist riots which killed about 50 Hong Kongers in 1967 – and Beijing’s 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown – also left a deeply ingrained suspicion of the party for many residents.
    Ahead of the handover, former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping – creator of the “one country, two systems” model where Hong Kong could keep key freedoms and autonomy – moved to calm nerves by assuring residents that they did not need to love the party to be deemed patriots.

    “We don’t demand that they be in favour of China’s socialist system; we only ask them to love the motherland and Hong Kong,” he said.

    With 90 million members, the party is ubiquitous on the mainland but in Hong Kong it has been all but invisible. The party itself has never registered as an official entity and the city’s proxy leaders have always denied being members – at least while in office. But the CCP has moved increasingly centre stage in recent years, culminating most prominently in this month’s festivities marking the centenary of the party’s founding. Hammer and sickle flags have sprung up across the city in recent weeks along with huge billboards proclaiming the anniversary. The local government hosted an exhibition titled “A Hundred Years of Prosperity and Greatness” while Beijing’s four government agencies also held a prominent symposium with a series of bellwether speeches. It was the first time high-profile events had been put on for a party anniversary in Hong Kong and it offered a vivid illustration of how far Deng’s definition of patriotism has changed under President Xi Jinping.

    “Safeguarding the leadership of the CCP is safeguarding ‘one country, two systems’,” Luo Huining, director of Beijing’s Liaison Office, said in his symposium speech.

    “Those who raise a hue and cry for ending the one-party rule … are the real enemies of Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability,” he added.
    .....con't

    ReplyDelete
  7. ....con't

    The party’s increased visibility comes as authorities enforce a political orthodoxy on the once outspoken city in response to huge and often violent democracy protests two years ago. Beijing has imposed a sweeping national security law that criminalised much dissent and rolled out a campaign dubbed “Patriots rule Hong Kong” to vet people’s political views. Protests have been all but banned using anti-coronavirus measures and most of the city’s pro-democracy opposition leaders are now in jail, facing prosecution or have fled overseas.

    “Beijing has turned to direct governance over Hong Kong,” veteran journalist and political analyst Johnny Lau told AFP.

    “The representatives of the central government do not mind coming forward to the front stage and showing their presence and leadership.

    “With ‘Patriots rule Hong Kong’ and the new security law … authorities have implied that people now have to love the country and love the party,” he added.

    Hong Kongers with connections to Beijing’s officialdom have suggested the same. In an interview published Wednesday by ultra-nationalist mainland media outlet Guancha.cn, Lau Siu-kai, a former chief adviser at Hong Kong’s central policy unit, said the Chinese Communist Party had once been considered a “sensitive phrase” in the city. As a result, the party had chosen not to carry out its activities publicly. But that approach, Lau said, was now “outmoded” because democracy protests had tried to turn Hong Kong into “an infiltration base that could be used by opposition forces to challenge the CCP’s rule”, he said. Now that Hong Kong’s democracy opposition had been “utterly defeated and scattered”, he added, it was time for the party to “seize the power of discourse”.

    Hong Kong officials have embraced that idea. After new laws were passed ordering all public office holders to make oaths of loyalty, Erick Tsang – the secretary for constitutional and mainland affairs – said there was now no room for political ambiguity.

    “You cannot say that you are patriotic but you do not love the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party or you do not respect it,” he said
    UNQUOTE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After all yr egoistic c&p DON'T u forget HK is a China territory.

      Yr pommie reigned HK has no more!

      Delete
  8. Just What is Bullyland and CCP afraid of?

    Population 1.3 billion vs 8 million
    90 million CCP cadre members vs 2-3 million rag-tag "liberals"
    GDP 100 times larger
    Alibaba, Didi, Huawei, Tiangong
    Aircraft carriers, largest navy in the world
    Largest standing Army
    Full control of media, no Google, Facebook, WhatsApp, Apple Daily ha ha
    Etc etc etc

    So if 100-yo CCP has such a great track record there is nothing to be afraid of. Have a Free and Fair Election in Hong Kong, as stipulated in the Handover Agreement, Hongkongers will surely vote for Bullyland and kick the liberals out.

    So What is Bullyland Scared Of? Anyone care to answer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. China is afraid of nothing!

      A Free and Fair Election in Hong Kong can be allowed PROVIDED the HK electorate must pledge their loyalty to China.

      Pure & simple.

      No sovereign country in the world would allow partitioning of territory by a small group of meme-ed foreign lovers.

      The CCP central committee wouldn't dare to allow it BCOZ the 1.4B Chinese wouldn't allow it.

      A simple & truth answer for u!

      Can understand?

      Delete