Sunday, July 11, 2021

Australia’s inglorious exit from Afghanistan - she shamefully asks herself "what role did we have in the decision-making in Washington over the prosecution of the campaign?"

Guardian (Aus Ed):

A tragic and wasted opportunity’: Australia’s inglorious exit from Afghanistan

Was two decades of war worth the price in human life, enduring suffering and monetary cost? It depends who you ask


‘It’s almost like, were we ever there? There’s just a few remnants of bases and buildings. It all looks as if it’s been essentially for nothing.’
File photo of Australian soldiers in Tarin Kowt, Afghanistan. Photograph: Cpl Raymond Vance/Australian Department of Defence/AAP

During the two decades in which Australia was ensnared in an unwinnable war after trailing the US into Afghanistan, a succession of our political leaders spoke reassuringly about how they would not desert the Afghans.

“We will not abandon Afghanistan,” the then prime minister Julia Gillard declared in 2011.

Her successor, Tony Abbott, said we must never “cut and run”.

And yet, with no formal announcement, Australia finally retreated from Afghanistan in mid-June with barely a whimper, pulling out the last of its 80 military personnel ahead of America’s final troop withdrawal in late August.



The war has killed 41 Australian troops. Another 260 have been seriously injured and a staggering 500 others have taken their own lives since their deployment. Australia has invested more than $10bn in a war that has also perhaps irreparably damaged the reputation of the elite Special Air Service amid allegations of war crimes against the most decorated living Australian soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith (which he strenuously denies), among others.

Australia’s Afghanistan adventure is ending ingloriously.

The Taliban are resurgent, capturing Afghan National Army bases and threatening many who worked with the US, its allies and Nato – including hundreds of interpreters who helped Australian forces. The divided, corruption-plagued US-backed central government is unable to properly defend itself with its fragmented, ill-disciplined army. Fear of an uncertain future grips Afghanistan.

The conclusion that Australia has abandoned Afghanistan on the exiting coat tails of America seems inescapable.

The optics are pitiful. Even shameful.
The remnants of the Australian military departed unceremoniously, the only public sign they had done so a news report two weeks later.

Aspects of the US withdrawal have been more ignominious. Under cover of night this week US forces plunged their main operating base at Bagram into darkness, shutting off the power and abandoning the HQ to looters while slipping out the unlocked back door.

The Americans didn’t bother to tell the Afghan commander who remained at Bagram he was now in charge.

‘We’ve abandoned Afghanistan’

Retired Adm Chris Barrie was chief of the Australian Defence Force when Australia joined the American invasion of Taliban-governed Afghanistan in late 2001, after the September 11 al-Qaida attacks on the US.

“We’re leaving with indecent haste, as the Americans have,” Barrie says. “We followed the Americans in, and we were not going to stay an hour longer than they were. Really, we’ve abandoned Afghanistan. Twenty years of effort comes to almost nothing.”

The invasion had the express aim of ridding Afghanistan of al-Qaida terrorist bases and capturing or killing Osama bin Laden.

“It’s impoverished, and its infrastructure has been destroyed in a lot of places,” Barrie says. “A lot of breadwinners in a lot of families have been killed by a lot of coalition forces including ours. The Taliban is on the rise, and I am troubled by the unfolding events.

“But we weren’t really there to do any good for the people of Afghanistan, we were there to help the US. And it raises the question, what role did we have in the decision-making in Washington over the prosecution of the campaign?”


12 comments:

  1. You see, this is Free Press. Australian Guardian hentam their own gomen. And they won't be shut down.

    We never see that in 5,000 yo Bullyland. Jimmy Lai and Daily Apple the latest case in point.

    QUOTE
    China is world’s ‘biggest jailer of journalists’, says RSF
    Reporters Without Borders says repression and attacks on press freedom increased worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    20 Apr 2021

    China continues to take internet censorship, surveillance and propaganda to “unprecedented levels”, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), making it one of the world’s worst countries for journalists.

    In its annual press freedom index, published on Tuesday, the global watchdog also highlighted an increase in repression and attacks on journalists worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The index examines the press freedom situation in 180 countries and territories, and RSF said its data showed that journalism is “totally blocked or seriously impeded” in nearly three-quarters of the countries evaluated, making it even harder for people to access proper information at a time of a health emergency.

    Aside from China, the four countries at the bottom of the ranking are Djibouti, Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea.

    Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Costa Rica were ranked highest for press freedom.

    “Journalism is the best vaccine against disinformation,” RSF Secretary-General Christophe Deloire said in a statement accompanying the report.
    UNQUOTE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Journalism is the best vaccine against disinformation”

      Wakakakakaka…

      It's also the best disguise for sensationalism & dispersion of misinformation!

      Mfer, takes yr pick.

      Delete
    2. Freedom of speech also include first report no Tiananmen massacre but revised it 20 years later based on "reliable he said and she said" but NONE was personally witness even though he was at the scene when it happened. So maybe the first report was first hand witness but revision got no choice have to be he said she said and just in case so add on the caveat :

      But we are far less certain of killings on Tiananmen proper. There were probably few, if any.

      Oh so there was probably none in Tiananmen Square but it happened probably, maybe, possible in Beijing.

      But so far there was no, NONE first hand report it happened in Beijing.

      Delete
  2. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=aY9KDgAAQBAJ
    Anyone who had taken the trouble to study the history of Adghanistan should have known to stay away and avoid occupation.

    They needed to excise AlQaeda and kick out AlQaeda's willing hosts The Taliban.
    That had been accomplished by end 2002.
    They should have got out by 2003.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So much of freedom of speech in democratic countries :

    Ofcom has revoked the license of the Chinese state broadcaster CGTN to air programmes in Britain

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/02/04/chinas-state-broadcaster-cgtn-kicked-uk-raising-fears-tit-for/

    Taiwan takes pro-China cable news TV station CTi off the air

    https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/pro-china-news-station-chung-tien-television-shut-down-in-taiwan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The principle in International Relations is Reciprocity.

      The BBC broadcast signal has been blocked in China for over 15 years, so CGTN , the China Government broadcaster can hardly complain if it is not allowed to broadcast in UK.

      China is currently playing an all spectrum attack to undermine Taiwan, just a little bit short of actual bullets flying, so nothing to complain about if China Communist propaganda is blocked in Taiwan

      Delete
    2. Wakakakakaka…

      Do that's yr understanding of freedom of speech!

      Wakakakaka…

      As defined in the demoNcratic fancy.

      No more surprises for anything leaking out from the katak dwelling under that fart filled well!

      Delete
  4. "The BBC broadcast signal has been blocked in China for over 15 years"

    The ban was only carried out from February 2021 only after China reciprocate upon UK banning of CGTN first, so you are right, The principle in International Relations is Reciprocity.

    Anyway what, how and where this "over 15 years" coming from?

    Undermine Taiwan? Ask those Taiwanese who are not in favour of independence. Where is their freedom of speech?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Should we rename that MonstrousBigot to MonstrousLiar ? wa ka ka ka

      Delete
    2. Wakakakakaka…

      Look at it this way.

      The namesake in that monster tag could mean humongous big or tremendously minute!

      Mmm… associated that with its ball!

      Take yr pick.

      Usually the Freudian interpretation is ALWAYS opposite to the user's intent!

      Delete
  5. Afghanistan has always taught the super powers to stop meddling in the affairs of other countries or else face the shameful consequences of being expelled or flee out like frightened rats. Vietnam and the Vietcongs taught the Americans and the West once, but the Talibans of Afghanistan did that several times. First the British, then the mighty Russians and now the Stupid Americans.Those intending to control the lucrative poppy and opium trade of Afghans by occupying the hilly and barren country must realize the Talibans have gone through years of war with the outside enemies and among themselves and have amassed large volumes of arsenals left behind by the frightened retreating losers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Taliban r not Afghan!

      Within Afghanistan, before the collapse of law & order from the last old government, there were already multitudes of tribal warlords fighting for their opium turfs.

      No less with the helps of pommie & russko!. & later the Yank!

      The Taliban emerged in 1994 as one of the prominent factions in the Afghan Civil War and largely consisted of students (talib) from the Pashtun areas of eastern and southern Afghanistan who had been educated in traditional Islamic schools, and fought during the Soviet–Afghan War.

      Despite having trillion or more in mineral deposits, it remains one of the world's least developed countries. Afghanistan's rough physical geography and its landlocked status has been cited as reasons why the country has always been among the least developed in the modern era – a factor where progress is also slowed by contemporary conflicts and political instability.

      Long period of conflicts, despairs & poverty breed formidable grounds for religious extremism - especially with the meme-ed an-eye-for-an-eye bloodletting dogma of Abrahamic cults.

      All the foreigners that came before had no good intentions but just her mineral wealth & geopolitical interplays.

      Thus, the misery continues to be flamed by growing hatred towards any foreign military interferences that were masquerading as humanitarian gimmicks.

      When REAL peace, no though how marginally defined in a long war torn state, eventually arrives, the radicalised theocratic rule would collapse by itself due to rising expectation.

      It would be a long hard climb for the Afghan, with possible much much more internal fightings & bloodlettings before decent sensibilities return.

      It's the ONLY way out for them - to solve themselves out by themselves via growing infighting fatigues & self awareness.

      Delete