PRIME Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s decision to appoint former Thai PM Thaksin Shinawatra as his personal advisor on ASEAN matters raises serious questions about his respect for Malaysia’s own diplomatic talents.
As Malaysia prepares to assume the ASEAN chairmanship next year, this move has sparked concerns over national interests and the role of domestic expertise in shaping the nation’s regional strategy.
During the recent visit of Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Anwar revealed to her – much to her appreciation – that Thaksin would serve as his personal advisor due to his “vast experience”.
Thaksin, once a popular leader in Thailand, spent years in exile after he was ousted by the military and only recently returned to Thailand where he was imprisoned and later pardoned.
Notably, Paetongtarn – who is Thaksin’s youngest daughter – and her family’s enduring political and financial influence in Thailand is well-documented.
While Thaksin may have significant clout and experience, appointing him as an advisor to Malaysia’s leader on ASEAN affairs is problematic.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (second from right) and his Thai counterpart Paetongtarn Shinawatra (second from left) with their respective spouses
Looking down on Malaysian diplomats?
It suggests a lack of confidence in Malaysian diplomats and experts, many of whom possess extensive experience in Asean matters.
This move undermines the contributions of Malaysian talent at a critical moment when Malaysia is poised to lead the regional bloc.
Anwar’s approach is even more puzzling when juxtaposed with his staunch nationalism on other issues.
For instance, he took a hardline stance against twice former premier Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad for unilaterally withdrawing Malaysia’s appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding the Batu Puteh dispute.
Yet, in this instance, where is Anwar’s nationalism in ensuring that Malaysia’s interests are prioritized within ASEAN?
ASEAN is undoubtedly about fostering cooperation and mutual development among member states.
However, appointing Thaksin – a figure whose primary allegiance remains with Thailand – arises questions about how this decision aligns with Malaysia’s interests.
A populist move?
Moreover, the powerful Thai military which has historically viewed Thaksin with suspicion may perceive this appointment as politically sensitive. Could this create unintended tensions with Thailand who is also an ASEAN member?
Prof Ramasamy Palanisamy
Anwar’s decision appears driven by excitement and populism rather than careful deliberation. Ideally, such a significant appointment should have been debated in Parliament to ensure transparency and consensus.
By bypassing these channels, Anwar risks alienating Malaysian diplomats and undermining national pride in favor of a controversial international figure.
Before this decision creates further complications, Anwar should re-consider and withdraw Thaksin’s appointment.
Malaysia has no shortage of qualified individuals with the expertise and experience needed to navigate the complexities of ASEAN leadership.
Elevating these homegrown talents would not only safeguard Malaysia’s interests but also demonstrate a commitment to national pride and self-reliance.
In this critical moment, Anwar must reflect on his priorities. Where indeed is his nationalism in advancing Malaysia’s role within ASEAN? – Dec 17, 2024
Former DAP stalwart and Penang chief minister II Prof Ramasamy Palanisamy is chairman of the United Rights of Malaysian Party (Urimai) interim council.
No comments:
Post a Comment