Activist lawyer Nik Elin Rashid has accused Perkasa of blindness in matters of faith in retaliation against the group’s allegation that she is ignorant about Islam.
Speaking to FMT, she said Perkasa’s statement against her showed that it had failed to appreciate a famous saying of the Prophet to the effect that Islam allows for differences of opinion and another hadith, equally well known, about God’s love for seekers of knowledge.
Perkasa’s criticism came on Thursday in response to a Facebook post in which Nik Elin argued that the Quranic injunction regarding chastity did not mean that women must cover their hair.
Amini Amir Abdullah, who heads Perkasa’s Islamic affairs department, warned her against speaking on matters about which she had no knowledge. He urged religious authorities to prevent her from spreading “deviant” teachings.
Nik Elin said it appeared that Perkasa members believed Muslims were not permitted to think or express their thoughts.
“Who are they to point fingers and say my knowledge of Islam is limited?”
She said it was unfortunate that there were Muslims in the country who sought to allow only a single interpretation of Islam.
“The blessed Prophet is reported to have once remarked, ‘Differences of opinion in my community are a blessing.’ But in Malaysia nowadays, only a certain class of people are permitted to interpret the sacred texts, being given absolute authority in all matters relating to faith and law.
Speaking to FMT, she said Perkasa’s statement against her showed that it had failed to appreciate a famous saying of the Prophet to the effect that Islam allows for differences of opinion and another hadith, equally well known, about God’s love for seekers of knowledge.
Perkasa’s criticism came on Thursday in response to a Facebook post in which Nik Elin argued that the Quranic injunction regarding chastity did not mean that women must cover their hair.
Amini Amir Abdullah, who heads Perkasa’s Islamic affairs department, warned her against speaking on matters about which she had no knowledge. He urged religious authorities to prevent her from spreading “deviant” teachings.
Nik Elin said it appeared that Perkasa members believed Muslims were not permitted to think or express their thoughts.
“Who are they to point fingers and say my knowledge of Islam is limited?”
She said it was unfortunate that there were Muslims in the country who sought to allow only a single interpretation of Islam.
“The blessed Prophet is reported to have once remarked, ‘Differences of opinion in my community are a blessing.’ But in Malaysia nowadays, only a certain class of people are permitted to interpret the sacred texts, being given absolute authority in all matters relating to faith and law.
 |
"If God is just as Islam is just, why do laws and policies made in the name of Islam create injustice?" |
Furthermore, intelligent and well-educated women threaten them or rather, their coco-balls, wakakaka.
 |
lelong lelong, bola Perkasa |
Thy coco-balls can be easily pulverised
By strength of our resolve and knowledge
We will then those smithereens sanitised
And make them for the cattle nice porridge
Wakakaka.
Who cares the fuck what Amini Amir Abdullah thinks.Dato bomoh got two bigger coconuts that Amir Abdullah.Amir Abdullah thinks he and the other fake religious leaders can tell women what to do.Now in the United States,women are coming out in droves and bitten the tiny pricks off of Donald Trump and his pack of sad sodomists.So,you religious fakes better watch out.Malaysian women can bite harder because they have bigger teeth.
ReplyDeletewakakaka, bruno matey, you certainly have the 'words'
Deleteintelligent and well-educated women vs poor logic n lying? hmmm like father like daughter.
ReplyDelete'Perkasa members believed Muslims were not permitted to think or express their thoughts.'
ReplyDeleteThe consensus of blur-sotongs is you should not comment on Islam if you are not an ulamak. Only ulamak have the right to talk about Islam and if you are not an ulamak then stop talking about Islam.
Wakakakaka....talk about deviant doctrine le!
What does one expect from the zombieic ketuanan freaks?
It's their impulsive response lah to keep the believers dumb & compliance. Otherwise, there will be NO zombieic setups.
Zombies MUST read!
ReplyDeletehttp://m.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/malaysian-constitution-in-line-with-islam-arab-scholar-says
Key points:
1) Any legal system and style of governance that protect lives, property and freedom of faith are already consistent with the Islamic tenets of justice. Muslims should only be governed by the Shariah were factually wrong!
2) The five tenets of the maqasid shariah are the right to faith, life, lineage, property, and the mind or intellect. They r universal values not limited to Islam.
3) Historical studies that included revelations from the Muslims’ Holy scripture, the Quran, to show that the religion had never espoused the idea of an Islamic nation state.
4) Historical studies to show that Prophet Muhammad did not try to establish an Islamic state. Evidence like documents and scriptures found during the Muhammad’s time showed the Prophet’s political leadership focused mostly on administering justice via Alliance of Virtuous (Hilf al-Fudul), not ideology.
5) The covenants between Muslims and the Jews of Madinah as well as between Muslims and pagans of Mecca showed Muhammad had only wanted the freedom to practise his faith and preach, and not the establishment of an “Islamic government”.
The zombieic towel-heads WILL shout blasphemy & WILL demand a Mustafa Akyol action on Jasser Auda, a distinguished professor at the Sultan Omar ‘Ali Saifuddien Centre for Islamic Studies in Brunei.