A year-end reflection — Hafiz Hassan
Friday, 29 Dec 2023 8:21 AM MYT
DECEMBER 29 — Lee Kuan Yew once said in a parliamentary session in 1987 that the effectiveness of the country’s system to check and to punish corruption rested, first, on the law against corruption; second, on a vigilant public ready to give information on all suspected corruption; and third, on an anti-corruption agency which “is scrupulous, thorough, and fearless in its investigations”.
But the strongest deterrent “is in a public opinion which censures and condemns corrupt persons”. In other words, “in attitudes which make corruption so unacceptable that the stigma of corruption cannot be washed away by serving a prison sentence”.
Addressing the Speaker of Parliament, Lee said:
“Sir, there is no way a Minister can avoid investigations, and a trial if there is evidence to support one.”
Lee’s speech in an august institution of the state was said to reveal the statesman’s zero tolerance of corruption.
Eight years later, when the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) was first launched in 1995, Singapore ranked third out of 41 countries, with a score of 9.26/10.
Lee had, by then, resigned as prime minister in November 1990 but continued to serve as senior minister (Nov 1990 — Aug 2004) and mentor minister (Aug 2004 — May 2011).
Malaysia, on the other hand, ranked 23rd in 1995 with a score of 5.28/10 — thirteen years after Dr Mahathir Mohamad sloganised “Bersih, Cekap dan Amanah” (Clean, Efficient and Trustworthy). It was a powerful slogan with the aim of changing the way Malaysians did things.
Lee Kuan Yew’s speech in an august institution of the state was said to reveal the statesman’s zero tolerance of corruption. — Reuters file pic
Have we, particularly being “amanah”?
Since 1995, Singapore has always ranked in the top 10 in the CPI. Malaysia ranked 37th out of 133 countries with a score of 5.2/10 in 2003, the year Dr Mahathir stepped down as prime minister.
Last year, the island state ranked fifth out of 180 countries with a score of 83/100, down by two scores. Malaysia ranked 61st with a score of 47/100, down by one score.
It’s year end, and time to reflect, particularly, on whether we are a public which censures and condemns corrupt persons with such an attitude which makes corruption so unacceptable that the stigma of corruption alone serves as a deterrent.
Have we, particularly being “amanah”?
Since 1995, Singapore has always ranked in the top 10 in the CPI. Malaysia ranked 37th out of 133 countries with a score of 5.2/10 in 2003, the year Dr Mahathir stepped down as prime minister.
Last year, the island state ranked fifth out of 180 countries with a score of 83/100, down by two scores. Malaysia ranked 61st with a score of 47/100, down by one score.
It’s year end, and time to reflect, particularly, on whether we are a public which censures and condemns corrupt persons with such an attitude which makes corruption so unacceptable that the stigma of corruption alone serves as a deterrent.
In Malaysian political circles, especially those beholden to Race and Religion Supremacists : which is All main parties these days, it is taboo to quote or speak admiringly of Lee Kwan Yew.
ReplyDelete