Jakel says didn’t mean to blame FT minister for blocking legal action over temple relocation, says decision made independently

Jakel says didn’t mean to blame FT minister for blocking legal action over temple relocation, says decision made independently



Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (third left) observes a replica of Madani Mosque during the groundbreaking ceremony at Jalan Masjid India, Kuala Lumpur. — Bernama pic

Friday, 28 Mar 2025 9:03 AM MYT

• Jakel Trading clarified that its decision not to pursue legal action against the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple was made independently and was not due to intervention from Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zaliha Mustafa.
• The company explained that Dr Zaliha had only shared her views on the legal and social implications of the matter, and criticised those who misinterpreted or selectively shared its managing director’s speech, which led to misunderstandings.

KUALA LUMPUR, March 28 – Jakel Trading Sdn Bhd has reportedly clarified that it was not prevented from pursuing legal action against Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman temple seeking for its relocation.

On TikTok, the company said it made the decision independently and did not wish to implicate Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zaliha Mustafa’s intervention in favour of the temple.

“Our decision not to pursue any legal action against any party was made independently, following consultations with our legal advisors and in consideration of the most peaceful resolution for all involved,” it said in a statement.

Jakel said Dr Zaliha had merely conveyed her views on the possible legal and social implications should this matter escalate, based on advice from relevant authorities.

The statement came as a response to the speech by its managing director Datuk Seri Mohamed Faroz Mohamed Jakel during the groundbreaking ceremony of the Madani Mosque yesterday on the land it owned — where the temple currently sits.

Faroz had said that the company was prevented from suing the temple by Dr Zaliha — leading to some quarters directing their anger on the minister.

“It is unfair to place blame on her when she has played a crucial role in facilitating and realising the construction of Masjid Madani — an endeavour deeply meaningful to our family and the wider community.

“Without her involvement, this effort would not have come to fruition as it has today,” it added.

Watch on TikTok

Jakel has since criticised those who shared snippets of the impromptu speech, saying it had led to misunderstandings and unnecessary concerns.

“At no point did he intend to place any blame on Dr Zaliha. We also acknowledge that his use of the word ‘menghalang’ may have caused confusion,” it said, referring to Faroz’s use of the word that may mean “obstructing”.

“His speech was delivered spontaneously, without any intention to discredit or criticise any party. Unfortunately, an excerpt from the full speech was selectively taken and published separately by certain media outlets, leading to inaccurate interpretations and negative reactions among the public.”

Yesterday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim launched the groundbreaking ceremony of the Madani Mosque — and said the “victory” achieved over erecting a mosque on the site of a Hindu temple is not one borne out of arrogance.

Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) previously confirmed that the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple will be relocated to another site agreeable to parties involved, following a proposal by landowner Jakel Trading to build a mosque on its land.

According to city officials, the new site will be roughly 50 metres away from the current one and that the temple will continue to operate until the relocation process begins.

Jakel Trading bought the plot in question from DBKL in 2014, allegedly without the temple management being informed of the matter.

***

kt suspects:

When Jakel "said that the company was prevented from suing the temple by Dr Zaliha" the bloke was actually trying to provide brownie points to Dr Zaliha. That backfired when some 3Rs-clowns manipulated the statement to indicate that there was ministerial interference to favour the Temple authorities. 😂😂😂