JPJ can bar drivers with
unpaid summonses from
renewing licence, says\
Loke
While the High Court ruled in 2008 that JPJ could not do so, minister Loke Siew Fook says this decision was set aside by the Court of Appeal in 2012.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83786/83786a092c325972ef244e81ee06a03bf5713c75" alt="JPJ WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN"
While the Kuching High Court ruled in 2008 that JPJ could not do so, Loke pointed out that the Court of Appeal had set aside the decision in 2012.
“The Court of Appeal’s decision meant that JPJ’s actions of barring the renewal of one’s driver’s licence or road tax (over outstanding summonses) is legitimate and right under the law,” he said in a written parliamentary reply.
He added that Section 119B of the Road Transport Act permitted the JPJ director to bar any transaction related to the Act if there were any unresolved cases or matters related to the breach of any of its provisions.
“Sections 17 and 29 of the Act, as well as the Commercial Vehicles Licensing Board Act 1987, also provides JPJ with the authority to take similar actions,” said Loke.
He was replying to Ngeh Koo Ham (PH-Beruas) who asked why JPJ could take such actions when the court had decided previously that the department was not allowed to do so.
In his question to the minister, Ngeh did not detail the specific court decision.
***
kt comments:
Light years ahead of the periodic idiotic "discount for fines"
Knowing Malaysians habits, it will lead to many vehicles without current valid road tax and insurance
ReplyDeleteWith the "digital road tax" system now, it is much less obvious which vehicles have expired road tax...
Which can be financially very damaging in an accident to a victim where even when the other vehicle is in the wrong, you are unable to claim against their insurance.
One time my insurance NCD was hit for some years because the other guy "chow khar" expired road tax and insurance.