Tuesday, September 14, 2021

The “Wolf Warrior”



Please “Shut Up” – China’s New Ambassador To U.S. Told Biden Administration In Zoom Meeting


Qin Gang, a former vice minister of foreign affairs and foreign ministry spokesman, arrived in Washington as China’s new ambassador to the U.S. in July. Notorious for tart responses, 55-year-old Qin was deliberately chosen by Beijing to replace Cui Tiankai at a delicate time when relations with Washington have plunged to their worst level in decades with no sign of bottoming out.

Unlike predecessor Mr Cui, who was ambassador to the United States for eight years, Mr Qin, a fluent English speaker, is known for his tougher and undiplomatic open remarks towards the West, especially the United States. His appointment to the key post has raised eyebrows, with some calling him the “Wolf Warrior”, while others called him a fox in sheep’s clothing.

Seen as a confidante of President Xi Jinping, Mr Qin may not possess the experience like Mr Cui, a veteran specialist in U.S. affairs. But with Sino-US relations at their more toxic in decades, Beijing was not concerned about diplomacy. After all, President Joe Biden has pledged to prevent China from passing the U.S. to become the most powerful country in the world.



Weeks before Qin started his job at the Chinese Embassy in Washington, President Xi unleashed his warning during the 100th anniversary of the founding of the ruling Chinese Communist Party – China will never allow any foreign force to bully, oppress or subjugate the Chinese people. It was revealed that China was building 119 silos for intercontinental ballistic missiles in a desert.



A man who is not evasive and does not beat around the bush, Qin Gang is precisely the type of ambassador Beijing needed to ruffle feathers in Washington. And he did exactly that during a Zoom meeting hosted by the National Committee on United States-China Relations (NCUSCR), a nonprofit organization dedicated to fostering bilateral cooperation and understanding.



Apparently, Ambassador Qin had just delivered a speech about the current state of bilateral ties to a small group that included NCUSCR’s board of directors on August 31 when he shocked everyone during a Q&A (question-and-answer) session. He was asked what steps the U.S. and China could take to improve the bilateral relationship.



In answering the question posted by Evan Medeiros, a Georgetown University professor who served as National Security Council director for China, Taiwan, and Mongolia in the Obama administration, Qin said Washington should stop worsening the situation in order to create conditions for dialogue. He then condemned Washington’s policy toward China using a “Cold War playbook”.



Subsequently, he dropped the bombshell – “If we cannot resolve our differences, please shut up“. According to the National Review, the diplomat’s stunning undiplomatic language had shocked the audience, who included senior American China experts, including former secretary of state Henry Kissinger and former Clinton and Obama staffer Jack Lew.



Interestingly, Chinese and the U.S. officials have so far not commented publicly on Qin’s extraordinary remarks – suggesting that the new ambassador has the full support of Beijing and there’s nothing Washington could do about it. That’s because what Qin said was consistent with what top Chinese officials have conveyed to their American counterparts in recent months.




Hilariously, Qin Gang and the Chinese Embassy in Washington then described the meeting as a welcome event. As vice foreign minister previously, Mr. Qin has been a vocal defender of Chinese policies and would not think twice about summoning foreign diplomats in Beijing to express official displeasure with their governments’ statements on Xinjiang, Hong Kong and other contentious issues.



The following week after he told Biden administration to shut up, Mr. Qin visited the Juilliard School in Manhattan and met with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and PepsiCo CEO Ramon Laguarta. He was also invited to attend events hosted by Kissinger and former Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew (Jack Lew), as if nothing had happened.



In reality, Qin Gang has long served as a concierge at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which he joined in 1988 and served as the spokesperson twice (from 2006 to 2014). A former news assistant at United Press International’s bureau in Beijing, Qin became a diplomat in 1992 and has served in various capacities at the Chinese embassy in London three times throughout his 8-year career in the UK.



Promoted to deputy minister in 2018, he was in charge of news and protocol work, and planned various diplomatic activities for Xi Jinping. Hence, Qin isn’t actually a greenhorn in diplomacy. Describing China’s diplomacy, he once said – “Diplomacy is complex and systematic work. It can be hard with some softness, or soft with some hardness. It can also be both hard and soft.”



When Barack Obama turned down Beijing’s invitation to include China during the U.S. president’s visit to Asia, Qin famously said – “Cozying up to the U.S. in exchange for the U.S. president’s visit is the last thing Beijing would do. I’d say China is right here, whether he comes or not”. When Obama finally visited China in 2015, the POTUS was humiliated.



Obama was deliberately not provided with a staircase to leave his Air Force One when he arrived in Hangzhou for G20 Summit, forcing the most powerful man to exit from the rear door. A few days after Obama gave a speech declaring the U.S. would remain a world leader for the next century, Qin said – “It must be nice to be the boss of the world. China was once boss of the world for more than a century”.



In 2009, Qin Gang chided a BBC journalist when answering a question about China’s “Green Dam” internet filtering system. He grilled the journalists – “Do you know what this software is about? Do you have kids?” His handling won him praise back home. Clearly, he wasn’t sent to Washington to explain or apologize what China is doing in Hong Kong, Xinjiang, or South China Sea.



He was sent to Washington as Xi Jinping’s representative to deliver the message that China is now a major power and it is going to stand firm on policies that are non-negotiable. The new envoy is not expected to change his style and will remain vocal. With the seal of approval from President Xi, he will speak authoritatively about the top leadership’s views on the China-US relationship.



12 comments:

  1. On current demographic trends, China will have a rapidly shrinking and aging population.

    No country in the history of the world has ever prospered with a shrinking population and China almost certainly will not be the first.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. China has 5000 yrs history to enlighten her about how to deal with aging population in a competitive world. There were records in her long history that such & worst cases happened multiple times!

      So, don't u worry.

      Remember how every nations failed that covid-19 pandemic open book test while china, as the first country in dealing the test as an unknown, fare so much better?

      Adaptation & change as one goes along the untried path IS inherent in the Chinese nature.

      Ooop… can't say anything about those anmokausai bananas who hate their skin!

      Delete
  2. Very Fitting Behaviour For A Bully’s Diplomat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. U do mean those Yankee ambassadors, right?

      Oooop… you have forgotten how that US ambassador to UN had behaved!

      Remember, play with muds then prepare to get muddy, blurred mfer.

      Delete
    2. Why got sour taste? Wakakakaka

      Delete
  3. Following Original Mao's Great Leap Forward (40 million deaths) and Cultural Revolution (2 million), the One Child Policy started by Deng Xiaoping was an even bigger human disaster, 400 MILLION births were prevented. It has been estimated that there were 336 million abortions as a result of this Cruel and Zalim Policy. For those against the Death Penalty Please Note -

    This is Death Penalty to Innocent Unborn Lives With No Voice.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy#:~:text=The%20impact%20of%20China's%20birth,child%20era%20beginning%20around%201980

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/9933468/336-million-abortions-under-Chinas-one-child-policy.html

    QUOTE
    China’s dilemma: Growing old before it becomes rich and powerful
    Eryk Bagshaw
    April 10, 2021

    For all countries, a lot depends on the dependency ratio. That is, the number of people aged under 14 and over 65, compared with the rest of the population.....

    ....In Beijing last month at the National People’s Congress its leaders grappled with measures designed to avert a looming economic and fiscal crunch: By 2050, China is forecast to reach an old and young age dependency ratio of 70 per cent.

    That will leave just 30 per cent of a population of more than 1.4 billion carrying the tax bill for an economy that will become the world’s largest by the end of the decade.

    How big will the bill be?

    The International Monetary Fund believes China will have to increase public spending on pensions by an amount equivalent to over 100 per cent of GDP in aggregate over the next 30 years based on current plans.

    That is $18.7 trillion. Four times the level of the average developed country as a proportion of the economy.

    “Chinese and international experts have been warning about a demographic time bomb in China for decades: That China will grow old before it grows rich and powerful,” wrote Australian National University researchers Yun Jiang and Adam Ni in their China Neican newsletter in March.
    UNQUOTE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ".... Great Leap Forward (40 million deaths) and Cultural Revolution ....."

      Don't forget contribution to this 40 millions deaths by the west that plundered China blind and left it hopeless and helpless to face the famine in absolute poverty and war torn ruins, no western help, no aids, none from all these faked self-proclaimed human rightists.

      Delete
    2. "...... 336 million abortions ......"

      If the robbery by the west didn't happen, China would not need to make that desperate decision of birth control. There was no money, no food can't feed the population Why? Because the west had ganged up (8 countries invaded China) to plunder China and left China in ruin. So the West, US and UK were also directly responsible with blood of these 336 million in their hands!!!

      Delete
    3. Wakakakakaka…

      Same old songs from the same old sources fr that fart filled well.

      Ooop… in yr world that's the ONLY sources of (mis)information u care to c&p!

      Delete
  4. 400 million Han lives taken away. 10 Afghanistans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The blood of 400 million Han in the hand of those marauders, plunderers US, UK and the West, those self-proclaimed faked human rightists

      Delete
    2. Wakakakakaka…

      As showcased in yr wet dream by our uncle Sam!

      Tan kuku lah or just don't wake up.

      Delete