Monday, October 15, 2018

Israeli court bullies foreign critics a la US extraterritorial jurisdiction

Guardian (Australian Edition) - Israel fines New Zealand women $18,000 for urging Lorde concert boycott:


Lorde cancelled her Tel Aviv concert in 2017

Photograph: Jess Gleeson

An Israel court has ordered two New Zealand women to pay damages for harming the “artistic welfare” of three Israeli teenagers after the pop star Lorde cancelled a planned performance in Tel Aviv.

Judge Mirit Fohrer ruled that Justine Sachs and Nadia Abu-Shanab of New Zealand must pay damages to Israeli teenagers Shoshana Steinbach, Ayelet Wertzel and Ahuva Frogel totalling more than NZ$18,000 for writing a letter urging the singer to cancel her concert in Tel Aviv, the Jerusalem Post reports.


It is believed to be the first effective use of a 2011 Israeli law allowing civil lawsuits of anyone who encourages a boycott of Israel.



Lorde cancels Israel concert after pro-Palestinian campaign 

The Israeli teenagers claimed their “artistic welfare” was damaged because of the cancellation and that they suffered “damage to their good name as Israelis and Jews”.

It remained unclear whether the claimants would be able to collect the cash. Legal experts said the judgement was not automatically enforceable under New Zealand law, and the chance of the women being compelled to pay damages was unlikely as they were not in Israel when they wrote the open letter and did not participate in the court process in any way.

A spokesperson for the New Zealand ministry of foreign affairs said it would be up to the courts of New Zealand to decide whether the claim for damages was enforceable.

In December 2017 the Grammy winning New Zealand pop star Lorde cancelled her planned June 2018 concert in Tel Aviv after a social media campaign sparked by an open letter from Sachs and Abu-Shanab.

The lawsuit argued that Lorde’s response on Twitter after receiving the letter showed her decision was directly influenced by the New Zealand women’s plea.

“I have had a lot of discussions with people holding many views, and I think the right decision at this time is to cancel the show,” Lorde wrote at the time, adding: “I’m not too proud to admit I didn’t make the right call on this one.”

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, president of the Shurat HaDin NGO, who filed the suit called the ruling “precedent-setting”.

“This decision makes it clear that anyone who calls for a boycott against the state of Israel could find themselves liable for damages and need to pay compensation to those hurt by the boycott call, if they’re in Israel or outside it,” Darshan-Leitner told the Jerusalem Post.

“We will enforce this ruling in New Zealand and go after their bank accounts until it has been fully realised.”

In a joint statement on Friday, Sachs and Abu-Shanab said they had been flooded with offers of financial assistance from around the world to help pay the damages, but had no intention of doing so. Instead, the women have started a crowdfunding page to raise funds for The Gaza Mental Health Foundation.

“Our advice from New Zealand legal experts has been clear: Israel has no right to police the political opinions of people across the world,” the statement read.

“They also continue to believe that this is a stunt of which the sole intention is to intimidate Israel’s critics ... We’ve contacted the relevant people in our government in the hope they can make it clear that New Zealand will not stand by and allow Israel to attempt to bully its citizens.”

At the time that calls for the boycott began, Lorde said she had received an “overwhelming number of messages and letters” regarding the issue.

“Dear Lorde ... we’re two young women based in Aotearoa, one Jewish, one Palestinian,” wrote Sachs and Abu-Shanab in their open letter.

Today, millions of people stand opposed to the Israeli government’s policies of oppression, ethnic cleansing, human rights violations, occupation and apartheid. As part of this struggle, we believe that an economic, intellectual and artistic boycott is an effective way of speaking out against these crimes. This worked very effectively against apartheid in South Africa, and we hope it can work again.

“We can play an important role in challenging injustice today. We urge you to act in the spirit of progressive New Zealanders who came before you and continue their legacy.”

The cultural boycott of Israel through the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement launched in 2005 and has gathered momentum in recent years even if its economic impact remains negligible.

Lorde has been contacted for comment.


Racists since c. 1450 BCE


20 comments:

  1. So ?

    The concert was essentially a commercial undertaking, and if you take actions to deliberately obstruct the event, people who can show cause that they have been damaged by the actions have a right to sue.

    Its up to New Zealand courts to decide whether the award is enforceable in New Zealand. They have a reputation for independence and impartiality.

    The other complications , of course, is that Justine Sachs and Nadia Abu-Shanab have to be careful they don't find themselves in some other national juristdiction where the Israeli court order IS enforceable....then they would be fully liable.

    Probably rules them out from travelling to the USA for the foreseeable future....wakakaka...


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. only a pro Israeli balls carrier like you would agree to the charge of damaging the Israeli teenagers' “artistic welfare” -what kok-tok

      Delete
    2. Wakakaka...Yes I am an admirer of many things about Israel.
      But Ktemoc paints people who support an opposite viewpoint from his as a Ball Carrier

      Delete
    3. and what do you call me for having opposite political views to you??? People like you who live in glass houses should not throw stones

      Delete
    4. The Israeli Court allowing civil suits against citizens or non-citizens of another country is opening a Pandora Box if it thinks it can make rulings like the International Courts.

      What dumb judges when even criminal charges are not even enforceable, what more civil charges.

      What's next? Those citizens in other countries follow suit and their own courts judges also make criminal and civil charges against Israeli?

      Religous courts may also jump in on the bandwagon and we have more work and $$$$$$$ for civil and religious lawyers, judges etc?

      Delete
    5. So Ktemoc admits he is a Najib admirer !

      Delete
    6. monsterball, as I have often remarked, have been stupidly childish when he's desperately out of ideas or substantial rebuttals - he's so driven by dedak that he has been prepared to demean himself with infantile comments and wild reckless accusations

      Delete
    7. Huh? Cheebye motherfucker kaytee calling others childish

      Kettlw......pot.......black

      Don't give any hoot about the Isrealis'ruling. I am very interested when Najib shall be beheaded for treason. More important!

      Delete
    8. I did not fCk your mother so stop calling me motherfucker in the silly hope I will be your father

      Delete
    9. Every living soul and his dog knows that you and your liar sifu are chest deep in dedak la, jangan kelentong here by accusing your visitors like Monster of the same. Macam pencuri..yelling thief ! thief ! when oneself is the actual thief just to deflect attention away, wakakkaka. Tactic basi la...yawnnn

      Delete
    10. wakakaka, you are such a desperate and insubstantial liar - actually you are worse than CK

      Delete
    11. Hehe...for someone who hails fervently that Mabuk RPuKi Liar as your Sifu, who had proven again and again a shameless and depraved liar and fake news fabricator, your running down of CK and me as being 'worse' than him, I will take it as an honour.

      Delete
  2. Cheebye Motherfucker kaytee should be very very afraid

    https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/15/australia/pauline-hanson-white-australia-intl/index.html

    28 senators supporting it. Perhaps we should encourage Pauline Hanson to tangkap kaytee instead

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did not fCk your mother so stop calling me motherfucker in the silly hope I will be your father

      Delete
  3. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/oct/16/australian-senators-inadvertently-back-far-right-motion-saying-its-ok-to-be-white

    hahahahahha...

    If only administrative error would result in sending kaytee to sungai buloh prison

    Fuck you cheebye motherfucker kaytee.......that issue is fucking more important than the cheebye palestinian issue la.

    Kaytee should do himself a favour by committing seppuku and die

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did not fCk your mother so stop calling me motherfucker in the silly hope I will be your father

      FYI, Derryn Hinch (Victoria Independent Senator) said one only have to look at the faces in Parliament to rubbish Pauline Hanson's racist motion

      Delete
    2. Australia’s government has been forced into an embarrassing re-vote in parliament after it supported a far-right motion declaring “It’s OK to be white”.

      The ruling Liberal-National Coalition blamed an “administrative error” for its senators’ decision to vote in favour of the motion on Monday, which had been put forward by Pauline Hanson, the leader of the anti-immigration One Nation party.

      The phrase has been used by far-right groups including the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis to stoke racial division.

      On Tuesday, in the face of enormous backlash, the government backed away from its support for the motion, with the prime minister saying the original vote was “regrettable”.

      The government accepted a challenge from the opposition Labor party to recommit the vote, with senators present voting unanimously against the motion during the second vote.

      The government’s leader in the upper house, Mathias Cormann, said he took personal responsibility for Monday’s error, apologising to the Senate. “This is severely embarrassing,” he told parliament.

      After Labor and the Greens cast doubt on the government’s explanation as an administrative error, Cormann said that, while seeming implausible, it was true. “It is often said when wondering whether something is a conspiracy or a stuff-up, go for the stuff-up every time,” he said.

      The attorney general, Christian Porter, admitted it was his office’s fault. “An early email advising an approach on the motion went out from my office on this matter without my knowledge,” Porter said in a statement on Tuesday.

      ***

      the difference in Australia is people's power which terrified the Coalition (especially with the Wentworth by-election just around the corner) into backing down and bullshitting it was an admin error

      if the Coalition loses its blue-ribbon seat in Wentworth, it not only loses its one seat majority in parliament but faces disgrace for losing a blue ribbon seat

      And it';s all your fault looes because you failed to keep Pauline "tied down", wakakaka

      Delete
  4. Israel has a right to defend itself over the aggressive and discriminatory BDS movement.

    No nation on earth will allow itself to be a passive sitting target of such an international conspiracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wonder why Europeans applied BDS against Israel?

      Delete
    2. Scratch the vast majority of Europeans 0.1 mm below the skin and you will find centuries of European anti-Jew racism still very much alive.

      Case in mind Jeremy Corbin, leader of the British Labour Party and potential future British PM.

      Delete