The mfering Zionists r desperate to show her nuclear capability after her Yankee suppliers run out of viable military stockpiles!
The mfering Zionists r desperate to show her nuclear capability after her Yankee suppliers run out of viable military stockpiles!
Nuclear Weapon Used By Israel In Its Attack On Syria?
On December 16, Israel conducted an airstrike on a Syrian weapons depot in Tartus, reportedly destroying a Scud missile facility. Speculation arose that Israel used a small nuclear weapon, as increased radiation levels were detected in Turkey and Cyprus. The strike caused a magnitude 3 earthquake, felt as far as Turkey. This incident, along with ongoing Israeli military activities, has raised global concerns about Middle Eastern stability.
Idiots... it just proves Israel successfully destroyed a massive cache of conventional missiles in Syria..
With missiles , both the warhead and the missiles propellants comprise highly explosive material. The resulting explosion would be stupendous and also radioactive.
Syria may well have also produced a "dirty bomb" along the way, not particularly difficult to make.If one had been blown up, it would spread radioactivity through a wide area without a nuclear blast.
Bodoh idiots obviously never read about the Messines nines if WW1 the most powerful conventional explosive attack ever conducted in history. The explosion was felt and heard in Manchester, 500 miles away.
Or the explosion that destroyed the town of Halifax in WW2. The largest detonation in history caused by non-nuclear explosives .
"With missiles , both the warhead and the missiles propellants comprise highly explosive material. The resulting explosion would be stupendous and also radioactive"
Wow… mfer, u know propellents/explosives used in missiles! In yr wet dream!
"Syria may well have also produced a "dirty bomb""
If Syria has that bomb, it would be in the league of NKorea, whom nobody DARES to invade!
Messines mines/Halifax of WW1/WW2, the most powerful conventional explosive attack ever conducted in history. Yet their explosive signatures & aftermath destructive evidences shown their ineffective match to an nuclear explosion! Radioactive fallouts included!
Care to check yr f*cked sources about the quantitative description of the Messines/Halifax explosions? If u want to lie, make sure u can backup yr mfering lie!
Ooop… better still wikipedia records can be rewritten by 3rd party. Time for a mfering Zionist whitewashed to do it's job - paid or volunteer.
CCP Waumao idiot should check with his fucked sources on what a Dirty Bomb is. You don't need to be North Korea to make a dirty bomb. Any country or group with access to highly radioactive material , including nuclear waste, and conventional explosives can make a Dirty Nomb. It would take some expertise to configure the explosives to spread the radioactive material as widely as possible, but such know how does exist among many military or retired military officers.
Back to my question, CCP Waumao idiot should check with his fucked sources on what a Dirty Bomb is.
A dirty bomb is Not an atomic weapon. It is a conventional explosive device designed to spread radioactive material as widely as possible. In a worst case it could render a whoe city dangerous to human habitation for decades or centuries
The most common dirty radioactive projectiles used in battlefields is Depleted uranium (DU), a less radioactive and non-fissile 238U. The more potent dirty bomb uses dynamite or other explosives to scatter radioactive dust, smoke, or other material in order to cause radioactive contamination. That radioactive dust is commonly the spent nuclear fuel or nuclear material in transit. There r evil intent in using the highly toxic, long half-life plutonium fragment s in dirty bomb deployment. The main purpose of using dirty bomb is to create fears amongst individuals close to the site of the explosion.
Thus Zionist using dirty bomb on Syrian weapons depot in Tartu is purely imaginative. Their intent is to destroy , not fear mongering!
A fact check would show that the Zionist state has run out of potent missiles to destroy any large military armour depots. But they have small nuclear warhead that have been long designated as their last resource of war. Many of these warhead have reached the end of their shield life & thus using one to cleanse out an enemy's depot suits perfectly.
Wakakaka… "render a whoe city dangerous to human habitation for decades or centuries" via dirty bomb?
Idiots... it just proves Israel successfully destroyed a massive cache of conventional missiles in Syria..
ReplyDeleteWith missiles , both the warhead and the missiles propellants comprise highly explosive material.
The resulting explosion would be stupendous and also radioactive.
Syria may well have also produced a "dirty bomb" along the way, not particularly difficult to make.If one had been blown up, it would spread radioactivity through a wide area without a nuclear blast.
Bodoh idiots obviously never read about the Messines nines if WW1 the most powerful conventional explosive attack ever conducted in history. The explosion was felt and heard in Manchester, 500 miles away.
Or the explosion that destroyed the town of Halifax in WW2. The largest detonation in history caused by non-nuclear explosives .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mines_in_the_Battle_of_Messines_%281917%29?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Explosion?wprov=sfla1
Wakakakaka…
Delete"With missiles , both the warhead and the missiles propellants comprise highly explosive material.
The resulting explosion would be stupendous and also radioactive"
Wow… mfer, u know propellents/explosives used in missiles! In yr wet dream!
"Syria may well have also produced a "dirty bomb""
If Syria has that bomb, it would be in the league of NKorea, whom nobody DARES to invade!
Messines mines/Halifax of WW1/WW2, the most powerful conventional explosive attack ever conducted in history. Yet their explosive signatures & aftermath destructive evidences shown their ineffective match to an nuclear explosion! Radioactive fallouts included!
Care to check yr f*cked sources about the quantitative description of the Messines/Halifax explosions? If u want to lie, make sure u can backup yr mfering lie!
Ooop… better still wikipedia records can be rewritten by 3rd party. Time for a mfering Zionist whitewashed to do it's job - paid or volunteer.
CCP Waumao idiot should check with his fucked sources on what a Dirty Bomb is.
DeleteYou don't need to be North Korea to make a dirty bomb.
Any country or group with access to highly radioactive material , including nuclear waste, and conventional explosives can make a Dirty Nomb.
It would take some expertise to configure the explosives to spread the radioactive material as widely as possible, but such know how does exist among many military or retired military officers.
Back to my question, if Syria can make a 'dirty bomb' can any other countries tried to invade her?
DeleteRadioactive material, no matter how lousy is the quality, still need sufficient concentration to achieve explosive reaction.
Mfer, how many country in the world can directly & singlehandedly doing that successfully?
Iran tried, & yet the centrifugal systems were sabotaged by Zionist state & Yankee underhands!
Wakakaka… yr mfering military or retired military officer can do that… wow…
Back to my question, CCP Waumao idiot should check with his fucked sources on what a Dirty Bomb is.
DeleteA dirty bomb is Not an atomic weapon.
It is a conventional explosive device designed to spread radioactive material as widely as possible.
In a worst case it could render a whoe city dangerous to human habitation for decades or centuries
Wow… yr kind of dirty bomb made in the backyard!
DeleteThe most common dirty radioactive projectiles used in battlefields is Depleted uranium (DU), a less radioactive and non-fissile 238U.
The more potent dirty bomb uses dynamite or other explosives to scatter radioactive dust, smoke, or other material in order to cause radioactive contamination. That radioactive dust is commonly the spent nuclear fuel or nuclear material in transit. There r evil intent in using the highly toxic, long half-life plutonium fragment s in dirty bomb deployment.
The main purpose of using dirty bomb is to create fears amongst individuals close to the site of the explosion.
Thus Zionist using dirty bomb on Syrian weapons depot in Tartu is purely imaginative. Their intent is to destroy , not fear mongering!
A fact check would show that the Zionist state has run out of potent missiles to destroy any large military armour depots. But they have small nuclear warhead that have been long designated as their last resource of war. Many of these warhead have reached the end of their shield life & thus using one to cleanse out an enemy's depot suits perfectly.
Wakakaka… "render a whoe city dangerous to human habitation for decades or centuries" via dirty bomb?
Ooop… in yr wettest dream!