Tuesday, August 22, 2023

AG urged to answer quickly over ‘leaked memo’ on Najib case


FMT:

AG urged to answer quickly over ‘leaked memo’ on Najib case


Neow Choo Seong of MCA says the AGC must confirm whether the leaked memo is authentic as it purportedly says the government should drop the case.



The Attorney-General’s Chambers has said it is investigating a purportedly leaked memorandum that there was no case against Najib Razak and Irwan Serigar Abdullah.


PETALING JAYA: An MCA leader has urged the Attorney-General’s Chambers to quickly explain a purportedly leaked internal memo suggesting that the government drop a 1MDB case involving Najib Razak.

Neow Choo Seong of MCA said the AGC must immediately confirm whether the document is authentic or not.

“Among the contents of the alleged internal memo is the conclusion that there was no case to bring against Najib (and former Treasury secretary-general Irwan Serigar Abdullah),” he said.

The case was that involving 1Malaysia Development Bhd and the Abu Dhabi-owned International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC).

“The issue must be clarified swiftly as it also involves Malaysia’s diplomatic ties with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates because IPIC is owned by Abu Dhabi,” he said in a Facebook post.

The alleged memo was purportedly sent to the then attorney-general Tommy Thomas by the lead prosecutor in the case, Jamil Airpin, in September 2019.

It said an evaluation of available evidence found that they were “grossly insufficient to prove not even a prima facie case for the six charges, let alone to secure a conviction beyond reasonable doubt”.

The AGC has since said it is probing the leak of the document but did not confirm its authenticity.


1 comment:

  1. Internal AGC discussions or debates about the merits or lack of concerning a case must not be allowed to become another political playground.

    One, the AG has full discretion to proceed with a prosecution or not.
    UMNO/BN politicians and their supporters (wakakaka) may detest Tommy Thomas, but the fact is he was duly appointed by the Agong ccording to the advice of the PM , per the Constitution.

    Two, the AG is not the judge, so the guilt or innocence of the accused is for the Judge to decide, after all the evidence is presented in Court.

    Do not interfere with the court

    ReplyDelete