Paralegal gets 5½ years’ jail for biting off police sergeant’s fingertip during chaotic Hong Kong protest at shopping mall
- To Kai-wa, 24, committed a series of offences within minutes during clashes at New Town Plaza shopping centre in July 2019
- Judge also noted defendant knowingly attacked two other officers with an umbrella and incited protesters on site to assault or insult police
Defendant To Kai-wa was earlier found guilty of four offences.
Photo: K. Y. Cheng
A paralegal has been jailed for 5½ years for a rapid string of assaults and disorderly conduct which included biting off a Hong Kong police sergeant’s fingertip during an anti-government protest in 2019.
District Judge Johnny Chan Jong-herng on Monday said To Kai-wa, 24, committed a series of offences within minutes during chaotic clashes at New Town Plaza shopping centre in Sha Tin on July 14, 2019, and “cruelly” inflicted tremendous harm upon the sergeant in a serious case of wounding.
The judge also noted the defendant had knowingly attacked two other officers with an umbrella – fracturing a finger of one – and incited protesters on site to assault or insult police.
“[The attacked officer] had no prior contact with the defendant, let alone any confrontation,” he said. “He was attacked only because he was a police officer.”
Chan said this aggravating factor warranted a deterrent sentence, which he believed was more important than the defendant’s rehabilitation.
District Judge Johnny Chan Jong-herng on Monday said To Kai-wa, 24, committed a series of offences within minutes during chaotic clashes at New Town Plaza shopping centre in Sha Tin on July 14, 2019, and “cruelly” inflicted tremendous harm upon the sergeant in a serious case of wounding.
The judge also noted the defendant had knowingly attacked two other officers with an umbrella – fracturing a finger of one – and incited protesters on site to assault or insult police.
“[The attacked officer] had no prior contact with the defendant, let alone any confrontation,” he said. “He was attacked only because he was a police officer.”
Chan said this aggravating factor warranted a deterrent sentence, which he believed was more important than the defendant’s rehabilitation.
Anti-government protesters and police officers clash at New Town Plaza in Sha Tin on July 14, 2019.
Photo: Felix Wong
But he also accepted To was a man of prior good character without any previous criminal record, and discounted his sentence before imposing an overall term of 5½ years.
To, an employee at Kenneth Lam Solicitors who graduated from the University of Hong Kong, was found guilty last month of all four counts he had been charged with: disorderly conduct in a public place, assaulting a police officer, inflicting grievous bodily harm and wounding with intent.
The District Court heard To dropped an umbrella from height and used another to assault two police officers, before he bit off the tip of the sergeant’s right ring finger and fractured what remained of the digit.
To, an employee at Kenneth Lam Solicitors who graduated from the University of Hong Kong, was found guilty last month of all four counts he had been charged with: disorderly conduct in a public place, assaulting a police officer, inflicting grievous bodily harm and wounding with intent.
The District Court heard To dropped an umbrella from height and used another to assault two police officers, before he bit off the tip of the sergeant’s right ring finger and fractured what remained of the digit.
The sergeant had testified to experiencing “intense” pain while holding To down using pressure-point control tactics he had learned in training.
A neurologist for the prosecution concluded the bite was deliberate, while another one hired by the defence argued it could have been a spontaneous response to shock or pain – specifically, the sergeant using his right index finger to poke To in the eye.
The judge sided with the prosecution in finding that a reflexive movement of the jaw was merely a “fanciful possibility”, and had never been documented by medical journals.
He dismissed the defence doctor’s claim that the movement could have been an involuntary response to shock or pain as unsubstantiated speculation, ruling that To must have knowingly bit down on the sergeant’s fingertip with intent to cause him grievous bodily harm.
But, in sentencing, Chan also accepted that To did not set out to bite the sergeant, finding that he had only done so when the officer slipped his hand into the defendant’s mouth.
The sergeant was granted sick leave for 13½ months, after the tip of his right ring finger was “completely severed”, with the remaining section fractured.
He underwent reattachment surgery on the severed fingertip on July 15, 2019.
Still, he complained of frequent sharp pain when he testified at trial last October, noting he had only achieved 60 to 70 per cent recovery.
Wounding with intent is punishable by a maximum sentence of life in prison, but the term is capped at seven years when the case is heard at the District Court.
A neurologist for the prosecution concluded the bite was deliberate, while another one hired by the defence argued it could have been a spontaneous response to shock or pain – specifically, the sergeant using his right index finger to poke To in the eye.
The judge sided with the prosecution in finding that a reflexive movement of the jaw was merely a “fanciful possibility”, and had never been documented by medical journals.
He dismissed the defence doctor’s claim that the movement could have been an involuntary response to shock or pain as unsubstantiated speculation, ruling that To must have knowingly bit down on the sergeant’s fingertip with intent to cause him grievous bodily harm.
But, in sentencing, Chan also accepted that To did not set out to bite the sergeant, finding that he had only done so when the officer slipped his hand into the defendant’s mouth.
The sergeant was granted sick leave for 13½ months, after the tip of his right ring finger was “completely severed”, with the remaining section fractured.
He underwent reattachment surgery on the severed fingertip on July 15, 2019.
Still, he complained of frequent sharp pain when he testified at trial last October, noting he had only achieved 60 to 70 per cent recovery.
Wounding with intent is punishable by a maximum sentence of life in prison, but the term is capped at seven years when the case is heard at the District Court.
*********
kt notes:
Pity To Kai-wa, a mere 24 years old, did not escape to Britain or USA. Such a ferocious person with utterly no respect for the law would have benefited the two Western nations, wakakaka - "O Nancy (Pelosi), you just missed having a wonderful lad."
Indeed, China would be better off without a thug like To Kai-wa - Jeez, imagine this young brat dropping an umbrella from height (obviously to hurt people below) and used another to assault two police officers, before he bit off the tip of the sergeant’s right ring finger and fractured what remained of the digit.
By the by, I know of a Malaysian politician who bit policemen too, wakakaka.
lucky this police not born when ccp revolt, his dick n haed oso kena chopped off if try to stop ccp thug.
ReplyDeleteFiction coming out from that fart filled well!
DeleteIs this the best Bully-Police can come up with....?
ReplyDeleteFully armed and protected policemen got his finger bitten off by civilian "dangerously armed with a payung" in self defence?
Have they punished the policemen who committed violence against an innocent 12-year old girt out to buy art supplies...? So zalim this kerajaan.
QUOTE
Hong Kong shocked by violent police arrest of 12-year-old girl. When will this case be put on trial?
Child’s mother says her daughter was buying art supplies when she was tackled and pinned to the ground by police
Riot police run towards protestors and disperse them during a rally in Hong Kong against the government’s decision to postpone the legislative council election
12-year-old girl one of hundreds arrested in huge Hong Kong protest – video report
Helen Davidson
Mon 7 Sep 2020
Hong Kong police have been strongly criticised over the rough arrest of a 12-year-old girl whose family says was caught in a protest crowd while out buying art supplies.
Video widely shared across social media and in Hong Kong media showed the officers seeking to corral a group of people including the young girl, who ducked aside and tried to run away. An officer tackled her to the ground, while several others helped to pin her down.
The arrest came amid the largest street protest seen in Hong Kong since 1 July, the first full day under the national security laws imposed by Beijing on the city, outlawing acts of sedition, secession, foreign collusion and terrorism.
The girl’s mother told Apple Daily she intended to sue and lodge a formal complaint. She said her daughter and her 20-year-old son – who were both fined under the city’s pandemic-related laws against gatherings – were out buying art supplies, and that the girl ran away because she was scared. Her daughter was bruised and scratched after the encounter.
Claudia Mo, a pro-democracy legislator, said the actions taken towards the girl “shows how unnecessarily jumpy [and] trigger-happy Hong Kong police have become”.
UNQUOTE
Bullyland hasn't answered to any of these yet....but can only find one policeman's fingertip got bitten off....?? Ha ha ha so lucu.....
ReplyDeleteQUOTE
Still no Accountability for Hong Kong’s Police Force
Maya Wang
China Senior Researcher
HRW
Among the gloomy news coming out of Hong Kong is a bright spot: on November 19, the Hong Kong High Court ruled that the government had violated its Bill of Rights by not providing an independent mechanism for complaints about police. Two days earlier, Professor Clifford Stott, an independent policing exert in the UK, published a report concluding that the indiscriminate use of force by the Hong Kong police escalated the 2019 protests. Stott had last year quit a panel appointed by the Hong Kong government to investigate police conduct, citing the body’s limited investigative powers.
These findings will come as no surprise to anyone who witnessed police brutality over six months of 2019. Police officers were seen beating, pepper-spraying and teargassing people, including those subdued on the ground; shooting and blinding several, including a journalist; unnecessarily tackling demonstrators to the ground, including pregnant women, children and older people; and then giving patently improbable and outright false explanations about their actions in press conferences.
No police officers alleged to have used excessive force during the 2019 protests have been held accountable. Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, still claims that the existing police complaints mechanism – one that is part of the Police Force – is adequate. Even more disturbing is that the Hong Kong police have taken on greater authority, obstructing efforts to hold them accountable by arbitrarily arresting people for uncovering police abuses and by restricting press freedom.
Hong Kong public opinion polls have consistently shown that over 80 percent of people support an independent commission of inquiry to look into police misconduct.
Beijing has intentionally misrepresented the protest movement as pro-independence to justify tightening its grip over the territory. But denying people’s real grievances seems to be further angering its residents, whose desires for democracy, justice, and accountability are only growing despite increased repression.
The Hong Kong government has not yet responded to the court ruling. Beijing will likely put even more pressure on Hong Kong’s judiciary, the last major state institution standing to protect people’s freedoms, to fall in line.
Resolving grievances will come from respecting human rights. Authorities should establish an independent commission of inquiry into the 2019 police brutality, create an independent body to investigate police misconduct more broadly, and respect – not trample – the human rights commitments under Hong Kong’s Bill of Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
UNQUOTE
Talking about fine since Jibby admitted guilt to not wearing facemask and will pay RM10,000 fine does that not mean he is automatically disqualified as MP...?
ReplyDeleteQUOTE
...a person will be disqualified from being a Member of either House of the Malaysian Parliament under Article 48(1)(e) of the Federal Constitution if the fine imposed on him by a Court upon conviction for an offence is RM2,001 and above.
UNQUOTE
Keeping to yr farted c&p masterpiece of no brainer.
DeleteU r doing fine as a demoNcratic cur. Why don't u try yr luck at Atlanta?
To Kai-wa is very fortunate the CCP didn't demand the Death Penalty .
ReplyDeleteCCP now daily interferes with Hong Kong's administration, with CCP Fanboys cheering on.
Wakakalakakaka…
DeleteJust liken to what the hkies like to say
你吹!
Blowing wing to follow yr western masters' expressed frustration, mfers.