Thursday, December 01, 2022

Here’s What The West Plans To Do With Russia’s $300 Billion Frozen Reserves – And Moscow Warns Of Similar Retaliation





Here’s What The West Plans To Do With Russia’s $300 Billion Frozen Reserves – And Moscow Warns Of Similar Retaliation



After the U.S. and Europe imposed sanctions on Russia over Ukraine invasion, it triggered a massive devaluation of the country’s currency – ruble. Russians lined up at ATMs to withdraw their money. The Bank of Russia immediately hiked the interest rates to 20% to slow the withdrawal, as the ruble plunged 30% against the US dollar after the ban of Russian banks from the SWIFT system.



Indeed, the financial sanction was more lethal than economic sanction like the trade war between the U.S. and China. The reason why the Russian currency collapsed so easily and quickly was because the U.S. and its allies shut off the Russian central bank’s access to most of its US$630 billion of foreign reserves – effectively emptying its coffers critical to support the rubles.



The move to banish big Russian banks from SWIFT has put a limit to Moscow’s use of its US$630 billion war chest. However, the U.S. and the E.U. have underestimated Russian’s powerful leverage on its oil and gas, not to mention China or even Western allies like India and the Arab world, who refused to sanction Moscow. Vladirmir Putin also has a brilliant plan to boost its currency.



The strategy was to limit ruble selling and force ruble buying. First, Russia’s central bank immediately hiked interest rates to 20% from 9.5% to limit withdrawal as fresh sanctions by Western countries put pressure on the country’s financial system. Then it capped the amount of dollars (US$10,000 limit) that every Russian can withdraw from foreign-currency bank accounts.



Next, local banks were barred from selling foreign currencies to customers for the next 6 months (till Sept 9). At the same time, brokerages are not allowed to let foreign clients sell securities. The capital controls kicked in to fight the U.S. and its allies’ attempt to isolate Putin and Russia, hoping the economic disaster would trigger an uprising and regime change.



In retaliation against the European Union’s economic and financial sanctions, Putin has issued an ultimatum – Russia wants “unfriendly countries” to pay for Russian natural gas in ruble. Russian gas accounts for some 40% of Europe’s total consumption and E.U. gas imports from Russia contributes up to US$1 billion – every day – to Moscow even during the ongoing war.



Moscow’s unexpected retaliation saw the ruble becomes the world’s best performer against the dollar instead as the plan boosts demand for the Russian currency. On the contrary, it creates an energy crisis in Europe – even sparking inflation and escalating cost of living in the Western nations and the world. As the winter arrives and the war is still ongoing, recession is inevitable in 2023.



But what will happen to the US$630 billion belonging to Russia? About 2 months after the Kremlin launched what it called a “special military operation” to de-Nazify against Ukraine “neo-Nazis”, Russia said it was preparing to take legal action to challenge the freeze on its US$630 billion assets – consisting of gold and foreign currency. However, slapping the powerful Western nations with lawsuits would take ages.



Luckily only half of its foreign reserves were frozen. After Barack Obama and his EU allies unveiled a co-ordinated set of sanctions to punish Russia in annexing Crimea in 2014, Moscow has diversified its foreign reserves in Chinese currency. That, included over 20% of reserves in gold, had saved about US$300 billion of Russian assets from being frozen by the West.



Now, the U.S. and European Union are toying with the idea of confiscating the entire frozen foreign reserves under the pretext of using it to help Ukraine. According to the Russian Central Bank’s 2021 annual report, the largest portion of its foreign currency and gold assets (16.8%) were stored in China, followed by France (9.9%), Japan (9.3%), the United States (6.4%) and the United Kingdom (5.1%).




The countries that had frozen the Russian assets include the U.S., France, Japan, Germany, the U.K. and Canada. Some US$30 billion assets belonging to Russian billionaires linked to Russian president Vladimir Putin had also been seized. Even though the E.U. claims it has only frozen US$18 billion worth of Russian assets, internal European Commission document shows it has actually frozen US$70 billion.



On November 30, EU permanent representatives discussed how to forfeit the US$300 billion foreign reserves during a meeting in Brussels, despite Russian condemnation that such illegal confiscation would violate the European Constitution and international law. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, meanwhile, has proposed the creation of a special structure to manage the frozen Russian assets.



Some U.S. lawmakers have sought to add a provision to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) last month that would allow Washington to transfer the frozen Russian assets to Ukraine. However, it was so illegal that a group of U.S. House and Senate Republicans has opposed it. Moscow said both the U.S. and EU will risk losing the trust of the international community for robbing what does not belong to them.



Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council and the country’s former president and prime minister, has warned that Russia will retaliate by confiscating the money and property belonging to Western investors in Russia. While over 1,000 companies have shut down their operations in Russia, Putin has banned investors from so-called unfriendly countries from selling shares in key energy projects and banks.



Essentially, foreign investors with assets in production sharing agreements (PSA), banks, strategic entities, companies producing energy equipment, as well as in other projects – from production of oil and gas to coal and nickel – could not sell under a decree signed by Putin. Companies affected included Shell, Exxon, Mitsubishi, Mitsui, UniCredit, Intesa, Citigroup, HSBC and others.



Medvedev claims coincidentally, there are about over US$300 billion worth of foreign assets frozen in Russia, which would be enough to compensate it if the U.S. and its allies proceed to confiscate Russia’s US$300 billion foreign reserves. The biggest effect will be the reputation of the U.S. if Washington seizes and disposes foreign assets without a proper justification.



The financial sanctions have already raised the burning question – why should a country accumulate US dollar or currencies of its allies when it could easily be frozen or taken away? Would it not be safer to buy other assets such as gold as reserves? Even the idea of stockpiling commodities like crude oil or other metal sounds like a better alternative.



Now that the Western nations can easily convert frozen foreign assets as its own property, which is tantamount to daylight robbery, foreign investors would have to think twice about investing in those countries for fear of its assets being seized whenever they like during a political conflict. Worse, they might start selling their assets in the U.S. and its allies.


PM may announce partial cabinet list tomorrow







PM may announce partial cabinet list tomorrow


Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim might unveil the names of new cabinet members tomorrow - albeit a partial list, according to sources close to the PKR president.

If an announcement is made, however, it is not likely that those named will be sworn in on the same day.

The prime minister is scheduled to be in Perak for a list of programmes until the afternoon, including having an audience with Perak Ruler, Sultan Nazrin Shah.

The Straits Times, citing sources, said Istana Negara has also not added a swearing-in ceremony to its itinerary for tomorrow.

A PKR insider speaking to Malaysiakini claimed that as of this afternoon, Anwar was still working to finalise the list of ministers.

It was described as a challenging task for the premier as he had to deal with "many requests and demands" while at the same time, scaling down the number of ministries.

Many quarters to please

One of the sources claimed that the premier is capping the number of ministers at around 25, down from 32 in the previous two administrations under Muhyiddin Yassin and Ismail Sabri Yaakob.

"There are lots of people asking for positions. (Anwar) has to consider demands from over 10 parties," said the insider.

"Ideally, the list should be finalised by tonight, because a cabinet announcement may be made tomorrow. But I heard he might just announce the list partially," he added.

Asked to elaborate further on what he meant by a partial list and whether there is a rough figure to expect, the source said he had no clear indication on the matter yet.

The high-ranking PKR leader was reluctant to reveal the share of positions each coalition in the government would get, but added that a report by Sinchew Daily yesterday was not far off from what is on the table.

According to the daily, PKR will get Anwar as prime minister and four minister posts; BN will get a deputy prime minister post plus four minister posts; Sarawak's GPS will get a deputy prime minister post plus three ministers; DAP will get five ministerships, Amanah will get two ministers and Upko will get one.

Meanwhile, an Umno insider claimed that there was a setback in forming the new cabinet due to lobbying by a former minister, who is allegedly eyeing the finance minister position.

Ex-minister becoming a stumbling block?

The source, who is close to Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's office told Malaysiakini that the former minister is from the nationalist party, but his name was not among those in the list of candidates that Umno had sent to the Prime Minister's Office.

"He is the stumbling block. He was not part of the list and Anwar also doesn’t want him as finance minister.

"But because he had been lobbying with certain figures, so now we are in this situation," the source claimed.

Malaysiakini has reached the former minister for comment and is withholding his name pending a response.

Since Anwar was sworn in as Malaysia's 10th prime minister last Thursday, the spotlight had been on his cabinet planning.

It has attracted a lot of interest chiefly due to the composition of the unity government - which consists of major political coalitions like Harapan, BN, Sarawak's GPS, and GRS and Warisan from Sabah.

Last Friday, at his first press conference after being sworn in as prime minister, Anwar announced that the government he leads will have a smaller cabinet size.

In 2018, when Harapan won the 14th general election, the then-prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad had also taken the step of announcing his three key cabinet portfolios first before revealing his full line-up.


Russia accuses Nato of fanning tensions in South China Sea




Russia accuses Nato of fanning tensions in South China Sea


Foreign minister Sergei Lavrov says they are developing military cooperation with China because of Nato’s escalation of tensions there. (AP pic)


MOSCOW: Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov today accused Nato of whipping up tensions near China in a way that posed risks for Russia.

“The South China Sea is now becoming one of those regions where Nato is not averse, as they once did in Ukraine, to escalating tensions,” Lavrov told a news conference.


“We know how seriously China takes such provocations, not to mention Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait, and we understand that Nato’s playing with fire in these regions carries threats and risks for the Russian Federation. It is as close to our shores and to our seas as Chinese territory,” he said.

Lavrov said that was why Russia was developing military cooperation with China and conducting joint exercises.

“The fact that Nato members under the leadership of the US are trying to create an explosive situation there, in the wake of Europe, is well understood by everyone,” he said.

Lavrov did not provide evidence to back his assertions, but alluded to the formation of the Aukus alliance between the US, Britain and Australia.

He also accused Nato of trying to drag India into what he called an anti-Russian and anti-Chinese alliance at a time when he said the West was attempting to squeeze out Russian influence.


Thank BN for stopping PN 'frogs' from hopping again, Wan Saiful told








Thank BN for stopping PN 'frogs' from hopping again, Wan Saiful told


Umno supreme council member Mohd Puad Zarkashi launched an amphibious retaliation to Wan Saiful Wan Jan’s contention that PN is the sole coalition entitled to speak about principles because it chose to remain as the opposition.

Reminding the Bersatu information chief that PN comprises frogs who deserted Umno, Puad said it is the anti-hopping legislation that is keeping the coalition intact.

“Without the Act, many of its MPs would have switched parties…

“His party should be grateful to BN. The (anti-hopping) law was drafted and passed when a BN leader was the prime minister,” he said in a Facebook post.

According to Puad, this was proven when PN was unable to prevent GRS, which consists of MPs who are Bersatu members, from supporting Pakatan Harapan chairperson Anwar Ibrahim as prime minister.

The anti-hopping law, gazetted on Sept 6, was a key component of the confidence and supply agreement (CSA) inked by former prime minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob's administration and Harapan.

Puad also said that BN had joined the “unity government” based on “trust”.

On the other hand, he claimed PN chairperson Muhyiddin Yassin accepted BN’s support for his administration while harbouring a vendetta and had “intended to kill Umno”.


Perikatan Nasional chairperson Muhyiddin Yassin


“This is why Muhyiddin could be the prime minister for just 17 months. His own mistake was the ‘scheme of things’. His administration failed,” Puad added.

Muhyiddin had become prime minister following the Sheraton Move which collapsed the Harapan government in 2020, just 22 months after it came into power.

However, the PN chairperson, who was accused of heading a backdoor government, later fell victim to a political coup himself.

BN’s decision to join Harapan instead of BN altered the race for the premiership and government after the 15th general election resulted in a hung Parliament.

Despite suffering its worst-ever electoral setback, BN became the kingmaker with its 30 parliamentary seats and tipped the balance in Anwar’s favour.


Putrajaya urged to review trans-Pacific trade deal




Putrajaya urged to review trans-Pacific trade deal


An economist said the government needed more active industrial, trade and innovation policies rather than free trade agreements. (Bernama pic)


KUALA LUMPUR: An economist has urged the government to review the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), saying the free trade agreement could have grave consequences on Malaysia’s economy.

Jomo Kwame Sundaram said the CPTPP mainly benefitted a few big companies and businesses, and would worsen inequality in the local economy.

He said the government needed to take a more pragmatic approach to international trade, adding that more active industrial, trade and innovation policies were required for Malaysia’s economic development rather than free trade agreements (FTAs).

“Malaysia already has FTAs with Singapore, Japan and Australia. The three countries account for about 82% of Malaysia’s exports and 84% of imports among countries under the CPTPP.

“Malaysia will not lose much due to trade diversion by staying out of the CPTPP,” he said during a panel discussion titled “CPTPP: Why Malaysians Must Wake Up.”

The CPTPP is a free trade agreement among Malaysia, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Mexico, Peru, New Zealand, Singapore and Vietnam.

The agreement came into force for Australia, Canada, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand and Singapore in December 2018, for Vietnam in January 2019, Peru in September 2021 and Malaysia on Nov 29.

Brunei and Chile are now the only countries which have yet to complete their ratification processes.

Jomo said the agreement would also put Malaysia at risk of legal suits by foreign investors as it contains provisions for investor-state dispute settlements, where foreign investors could sue the government for actions related to foreign direct investment (FDI).

Speaking at the same discussion, Parti Sosialis Malaysia chairman Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj said there was no evidence that an FTA such as the CPTPP would be beneficial in attracting FDIs.

He said political stability and a sound local economic system would attract more FDIs.


Terengganu ramps up enforcement of unisex hair salon ban, warns of fine for offenders




Terengganu ramps up enforcement of unisex hair salon ban, warns of fine for offenders





TERENGGANU has reinforced its ban on unisex hair salons in the PAS-led state and operators who go against the gender-segregation licensing regulation will face a fine between RM500 and RM1,000.


According to state executive councillor Datuk Dr Alias Razak, this was not a new rule; rather, it is an existing licensing regulation under the jurisdiction of the local government.

“The hair salon or barbershop, be it run by Muslims or non-Muslims, is not allowed to provide haircut services for both men and women at the same time,” he was reported as saying by Sin Chew Daily.


The state housing and local government committee chairperson further warned that operators who do not abide by the licensing regulations will face a fine or have their license revoked.“There is no exemption for hair salons or barbershops run by non-Muslims. If we allow non-Muslim female hairdressers to provide haircuts for male customers, Muslim men may visit the shop,” he remarked.

During a debate session at the state assembly sitting on Tuesday (Nov 29) state assemblyperson Zuraida Md Noor called for enforcement action to be taken to ensure that barbershops and spas in the state observe Syariah requirements and gender-segregation regulations.

She said barbershops for men should only be managed by men and hairdressing salons for women should only be managed by women.

Zuraida further questioned the extent of which these regulations are complied with, adding that she had received complaints from locals who had voiced their concerns about men and women appearing in the same premise.

She also noted that this also happened in spas and beauty salons, and demanded to know how the hairdressing industry and beauty salons could overlook such a major issue. — Dec 1, 2022



“Care to comment on JAC appointment issue?” Najib asks Tun M, Tommy Thomas




“Care to comment on JAC appointment issue?” Najib asks Tun M, Tommy Thomas





A POSTING aired on Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s Facebook page has called for Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Tan Sri Tommy Thomas to comment on news reports yesterday (Nov 30) that the Conference of Rulers wants the Prime Minister (PM) to not be allowed to appoint anyone to the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC).


“Yesterday the Conference of Rulers it has been decreed that the JAC should be free of influence from the prime minister,” the posting read.

“Can (Dr Mahathir and former attorney-general Thomas) comment on this matter given that they had repeatedly violated the JAC Act by appointing judges of their choice (when in government)?


“Don’t pretend not to see yesterday’s decree and the special task force’s report on (Thomas) which was revealed two months ago.”

In a decree, the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, who chaired the 260th Conference of Rulers, said that the structure of the JAC needed to be reviewed.

The JAC is responsible for appointing judges to the judiciary. Under the current arrangement, five of the committee members are appointed by the PM while the remaining four slots are filled by sitting judges.

Tuanku Muhriz said in order to ensure that the JAC is free to carry out its responsibilities, the five slots to be appointed by the PM should instead be entrusted to other institutions such as the Bar Council, Sabah Law Society, Advocates Association of Sarawak and Parliament’s Select Committee.

The monarch said this way, the JAC’s membership is “more balanced” and would not “carry the interests of any groups”.

For context, Dr Mahathir had appointed constitutional law expert Thomas right after he became the prime minister for the second time.

According to a news report on MalaysiaGazette.com, Dr Mahathir appointed Thomas as the attorney-general (AG) in 2018 after Pakatan Harapan (PH) became the government. Thomas had resigned after the administration collapsed in February 2020.

The same news report also noted that Thomas himself had admitted that his appointment was not based on merit; rather, he said that it was a “political appointment”.

In September 2022, then PM Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob said Thomas should be immediately investigated for sedition and several other offences arising from the contents of his infamous memoir “My Story: Justice in The Wilderness”.

The former AG was subsequently probed under Section 8 of the Official Secrets Act (OSA), Section 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act and Sections 124I and 203A of the Penal Code.

A special task force formed to look into allegations in Thomas’ book had identified 19 issues, which had been narrowed down into four main issues.

The four issues included allegations levelled against the judiciary; exposing government secrets; abuse of power and professional negligence, and seditious statements. – Dec 1, 2022


T'ganu Syariah amendments to punish women acting as men






T'ganu Syariah amendments to punish women acting as men


The Terengganu state legislative assembly has passed the amendment to the Syariah Criminal Offences (Punishments) Enactment 2022 to strengthen the implementation of Syariah law in the state.

State Syariah Implementation, Education and Higher Education committee chairperson Satiful Bahri Mamat said the amendments were aimed at improving the state’s Syariah Criminal Offences (Punishments) Enactment 2001, which includes the addition of four new sections and 21 amendments to the existing punishments.

The four new sections include offences for Section 3A (witchcraft and black magic), 29A (pregnancy or giving birth out of wedlock), 33A (women acting as men) and 36A (sodomy ‘preparation’)(persediaan melakukan liwat).

“Several additions and amendments have been made where the basis for the amendment is to replace in accordance to the current terms,” Satiful (above) was reported as saying by Sinar Harian.

He also told reporters today that such amendments were made to maximise the punishment as per the federal Act 355 (Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction Act) which allows Syariah courts to impose maximum sentences of imprisonment not exceeding three years, any fine not exceeding RM5,000 or with whipping not exceeding six strokes or with any combination thereof for offences under the Islamic law.

On Section 3A (witchcraft and black magic), Satiful was reported by the Malay daily as saying that the state Religious Affairs Department has established a coordinating committee to monitor the matter.

He said the establishment of the unit is to ensure Muslims get alternative treatment that does not conflict with Syariah law and there are no elements that are against Islam.

"It is the same with the punishment of women acting like men. The enactment that existed before was for men acting like women only. This is why it was created because that trend is seen to be more prevalent recently.”

He stressed that the amendment is timely considering that it has been enacted for more than 20 years and the last amendment was made in 2016 involving only five sections.

The enforcement of the enactment will begin after getting the assent of the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin.


Post-GE15 challenges and opportunities


The Star:

Post-GE15 challenges and opportunities



By SHAD SALEEM FARUQI

Monday, 28 Nov 2022


FOR the fourth time since 2018, Malaysia has demonstrated to the world that a peaceful transfer of power is possible despite the ferment and foment of multi-party elections.

The Election Commission is to be congratulated for its professionalism and integrity in facilitating democracy’s iconic electoral exercise. The police and the Armed Forces worked closely to maintain law and order.


His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, with the wise counsel of his brother Rulers, steered the rocking ship of state through turbulent waters with skill and wisdom. Constitutional historians will record this challenging period as part of his enduring legacy.

Almost 74% of the electorate turned up to exercise their democratic right. Regrettably, the result was a “hung parliament” in which no person, party or coalition commanded an absolute majority of 112/222 seats. (Voting for Kedah’s Padang Serai parliamentary seat was postponed following the sudden death of one of the candidates.)

Hung parliaments arouse a mixed reaction among political commentators. The absence of an absolute majority creates a political impasse about who should be the prime minister.

In the exercise of his constitutional powers under Articles 43(2) and 40(2), the Monarch is unwillingly drawn into the vortex of politics. Whoever forms the next wobbly government is under constant threat of removal by acts of political betrayal.

Other commentators point out that hung parliaments are, ironically, an indication of a free and fair electoral contest, and are well known to mature democracies.

Malaysia is fretting unnecessarily because we are so conditioned to a political behemoth towering over all others. In many other democracies, the challenge of a hung parliament is easily overcome and the advantages are enjoyed.

The advantages are that hung parliaments require political, legal, social and economic compromises, which moderate the extremist policies of the various factions in parliament. A better check and balance ensues than in a parliament in which an all-powerful government enjoys a mammoth two-thirds or three-fourth majority.

Whatever one’s view of hung parliaments may be, the stark reality is that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is inheriting a broken, disunited and economically distraught nation riddled with multiple problems. But there is hope for the future if we are prepared to learn from the past.

For five decades after independence, Malaysia was regarded by much of Asia and Africa as an exemplar of a society in which peace, prosperity, democracy and development flourished. With all its flaws, Malaysia’s Constitution was a masterpiece of compromise, compassion and moderation. It sought to be inclusive and to promote unity in diversity.

We have had 65 years of peace, stability and prosperity with only a few dark episodes. There have been no threats of coup d’etats. No religion, region or race is at war with the central government. The dazzling diversity of the nation is permitted and even celebrated. Other than fringe groups of hate mongers, we are a nation of many colours.

In the human rights arena, political and civil liberties were always under stringent state control due to nearly 48 years of emergency rule and many tough security and emergency laws from the communist subversion days. However, socio-economic rights were well protected.

In many areas, like primary and secondary education, medical care, women’s emancipation and poverty eradication, Malaysia was doing very well. All in all, the country offered everyone a chance for upward mobility. Of course, there were unmet needs because the quest for justice is a journey, not a destination.

In the last three decades, however, the social fabric has come under severe strain. Constitutionalism faces threats from many quarters. The check and balance among the organs of the state has broken down. Corruption and looting of public revenues have become widespread and are regarded by many as natural.

Hooligan politics, hate speech, religious extremism and even enforced disappearances have marred our landscape. Race and religious polarisation is endemic and growing. Blatant misuse of religion and race to incite hatred is not uncommon.

In many areas of governance, economy, law, education and social life, decisions are made or thwarted by powerful elements who constitute a “state within a state”.

In addition to the above challenges, the new PM will have to face the statesman’s challenge of providing leadership to what some say will be essentially a “minority” government. Others brand it as a “unity” government in a “grand coalition”. Whatever it is, Anwar will have the ambitious task of reconciling the irreconcilable.

On a positive note, if anyone can do it, he can. With all his flaws, he is the leader best prepared for this historical moment. He has known adversity and he is better qualified than most to convert dares into doors and adversities into opportunities.

As hope and prayer, this column wishes that Anwar will set high standards of governance for himself and his Cabinet. Integrity must begin at the top.

Despite the imperatives of coalition politics, a bloated Cabinet is not what the nation needs. The PM may note that in our Federation, every State Constitution prescribes a modest limit of eight to 10 for its Executive Council. At the federal level, 15% of the number of MPs appears a workable proportion.

We hope the new PM will surround himself with a good team and unlock the potential in others. He may also wish to listen to advisory councils of technocrats and intellectuals for specific areas. This American-style innovation need not burden the taxpayer. The country is rich with people of patriotism who will advise committees free of cost.

The woes of the poor and marginalised cannot be remedied if a large chunk of the budget allocated for economic or educational development is abused for political patronage or is siphoned off by grossly overpriced contracts, kickbacks and cunning schemes. Unless corruption is tackled vigorously and with equal harassment, the economy may not improve and foreign investment may continue to leave our shores.

There are many fractured national institutions that require repair and reform. Parliament is one of them. A Law Reform Commission is needed to point out the other shortcomings or voids in our legal, political, economic and educational system. Primary and secondary education have long lost its lustre and does not arouse confidence.

Race relations are deteriorating. At home and in schools, our kids are being taught to hate and not to love. A multi-pronged approach is needed to reverse this trend. It is not too late. It is never too late.

Besides using the law and the education system as instruments of social control, the police and the Attorney General’s office must be prompt and impartial in enforcing the law against hate mongers who manufacture threats from imaginary enemies and whip up “ethno-populism and jingoist nationalism” to arouse distrust of “others”.

Our leaders as well as citizens must take a stand against such gutter politics and primordial tendencies. We all must promote respect and moderation. We must condemn hate speech and hate crimes promptly, strongly, publicly and consistently.

Despite the political benefits of identity politics, on matters of race and religious relations, leaders of substance should not follow opinion polls. American author Max Lucado reminds us that “a man who wants to lead the orchestra must turn his back on the crowd”.



Emeritus Professor Dr Shad Faruqi is holder of the Tunku Abdul Rahman Chair at Universiti Malaya.


Appointing Umno reps into cabinet must follow party hierarchy - Annuar







Appointing Umno reps into cabinet must follow party hierarchy - Annuar


Former Umno secretary-general Annuar Musa, who had been very vocal against party president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi including calling for the latter's resignation, took a different tone today over the BN-Pakatan Harapan government.

Commenting on the formation of the new cabinet, Annuar reminded Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim that he should choose cabinet members from Umno according to the party hierarchy.

He said Umno should not be taken for granted and its decision to support the government must be respected by all including the Pakatan Harapan chairperson.

"Umno through its supreme council had made a decision to participate in this unity government. It is a party decision that should be respected not only by party members but also Anwar as the leader of the government.

"Umno is not to be taken for granted. Umno also should not be taken halfway. It is like a bowl of dish, you cannot just take its soup but discard the content.

"Thus, in choosing who from Umno to be in the government, (the prime minister) must follow party hierarchy and accept the leadership," Annuar (above) said on Facebook today.

Anwar was appointed as the country's 10th prime minister after he received support from BN, GPS, GRS and Warisan to form a government.

Following this, the spotlight shifted towards the forming of Anwar's cabinet.

Zahid's name had been speculated to be a deputy prime minister candidate from Umno.

Annuar, who is a former Ketereh MP, was one of Umno's leaders who had been very critical of Zahid's leadership, including pressuring him to step down following BN's poor performance in GE15.

He had also criticised Zahid previously for bringing BN towards cooperation with Harapan.


PM Anwar Ibrahim and Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi


Meanwhile, in the same statement, Annuar also expressed his confidence that the prime minister would be able to handle the forming of his cabinet.

"What is important now is that the prime minister should have a credible and strong team.

"The people are waiting for things to improve for everyone. The people had been waiting for a long time," he added.


Mat Sabu: New govt joined forces to repel threatening ideologies







Mat Sabu: New govt joined forces to repel threatening ideologies


Amanah president Mohamad Sabu has warned that dangerous ideologies are on the rise again, amid a wave of attacks from PAS against the government.

He said this is why Pakatan Harapan joined forces with BN and others, in order to repel threats to the country.

Speaking for the first time at a BN-organised ceramah in Rompin, Pahang last night, Mohamad said while anyone can be criticised, there are lines that should not be crossed.

"Lately, Malaysia is overcome by ideologies that are unsettling.

"I can criticise Umno, whack BN, criticise or whack DAP, but there is a limit.

"It must not go back to how it once was, to the point that Umno was declared kafir (infidels)," he added.

The Amanah president said the culture of takfiri (declaring others as kafir) is on the rise again - and warned that it could ruin Malaysia as it had ruined other Muslim states such as Somalia.

PAS had not recently declared any of its rivals as kafir.


Series of attacks

However, PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang labelled Malays in DAP as "stupid liberals" that Islam rejects.

During the 15th general election campaign, Sik PAS Youth chief Mohd Shahiful Mohd Nasir said that those who voted for Harapan or BN would go to hell.

Shahiful and Perikatan Nasional (PN) chief Muhyiddin Yassin both apologised for the remarks.

Mohamad also criticised a video of Hadi saying that Muslims would be forced to be pig herders if non-Muslims ruled the country.

It should be noted that the video - which went viral yesterday - is from 2020.

Mohamad also claimed there was a call to "kill Chinese" during a ceramah.

This is believed to be in reference to a speech by actor Zul Huzaimy - who is a PN supporter - stating that he harboured a wish to "slaughter kafir harbi".

Kafir harbi are non-Muslims who are deemed as enemies, as opposed to kafir dhimmi or protected non-Muslims.

Zul did not say "kill Chinese". He had apologised for the remarks and claimed it was taken out of context.


PAS and PN continuously attacked Harapan and BN in the aftermath of the 15th general election, which resulted in a hung Parliament.

In the race to Putrajaya, PN claimed to have secured a majority, but Harapan chief Anwar Ibrahim eventually was appointed prime minister to lead a government comprising Harapan, BN, Sarawak's GPS, and Sabah's GRS and Warisan.

Harapan and BN also formed state governments under the latter's leadership in Perak and Pahang.


Amanah president Mohamad Sabu (centre) with BN’s Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail on his right along with other leaders and supporters.


Mohamad said those in the opposition can criticise the government all they want, but should let them serve a full five-year term.

He urged for there to not be a repeat of the 2020 Sheraton Move which toppled the previous Harapan government, and said that the opposition can vie for power at the next general election.

"In five years we can fight at the polls, if we win you accept it, if you lose, you accept it.

"Whether we win or you lose, there is no problem," he quipped.

On a separate note, Mohamad called on Anwar to launch an investigation into PN's campaign funds - claiming it was far beyond what PAS was usually able to afford in the past when they had to cut down their own bamboo poles and climb coconut trees to hang flags.


Mat Sabu brings laughter to Tioman campaign

The Amanah president had graced the ceramah in Rompin to campaign for BN's incumbent for the Tioman state seat Mohd Johari Hussain - whom he referred to as "our candidate".

Harapan had agreed to make way for BN in the by-election, although the name of the Harapan candidate will still remain on the ballot paper.

Based on the live stream of the ceramah, Mohamad was well-received by the crowd who laughed merrily at his jokes.



He quipped at the start of his speech that Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and deputy president Mohamad Hasan were especially curious as to how he would campaign in front of Umno.

"They said, 'We want to hear how you campaign in front of Umno. You've been whacking Umno for 44 years'.

"I told them, ‘Where do I begin?’," he said, inciting laughter from the crowd.





A recipe for a great cabinet










P Gunasegaram


COMMENT | A recipe for a stable, great cabinet which reflects the aspirations of the people as indicated by the number of Parliamentary seats the respective coalitions obtained should have three, not two deputy prime ministers (DPMs), with important ministries to be handled largely by Pakatan Harapan nominees.

After all, Harapan has 82 seats, Umno/BN 30, and Sarawak’s GPS 23, giving just these three coalitions a clear majority of 135 in the 222-seat Parliament. Thus, cabinet positions should be given in proportion to the seats held by these parties with exceptions made for one or two ministers for Sabah.

But first the thorny issue of DPMs. The PM is from Harapan and if anything happens to him, the one to succeed him should be from Harapan as reflected by the numbers. To ensure a smooth transition that means there should be a Harapan DPM now in addition to one from Umno and GPS.

Here’s the thorny part. We all know that under the law one is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

But does that mean that a person who has the proverbial sword hanging over his head can be made DPM or even minister? No! Unless it is pretty obvious that they are being fixed.



Looking at the various court clusters and the ongoing court cases, the indications are that none of them falls into the category. Thus it might be an excellent idea to simply exclude all people facing court cases from any ministerial position and thereby avoiding needless controversy.

Then, the PM can suggest that Umno and GPS name untainted, able senior MPs for the position of DPM - ask them to give a list of three names from which the PM can choose, one each from the two coalitions.

The three DPMs will have relatively important portfolios.

For the Harapan DPM, the choice is clear - the deputy president of PKR becomes the DPM. This way, the kingmakers won’t become kings when anything untoward occurs. It is important to get these things right from the start to prevent history from repeating itself.

This team of the PM and the three DPMs can work as the kitchen cabinet, all of whom will know how the country is being run and all of whom will be responsible to ensure that both their ministers and others do their job properly. They will also ensure their MPs are accordingly briefed and support the government in legislative matters.

Everybody remains in the loop and there is a clear line of succession - the next PM is the DPM from Harapan. There is communication, cooperation and continuity, all expressed clearly and concisely.




Appointment of ministers

Now comes the next prickly problem: the appointment of cabinet ministers. First, keep to the promise to reduce the size of the cabinet - perhaps to 21. Why 21? It seems like a nice number. That means some ministers can hold dual portfolios. This is nothing new - many countries do that, including our neighbours across the causeway.

But ensure no double salaries for ministers - ensure they get just one salary. Remember they get MPs allowances too. That will set the example for austerity and the emphasis on serving rather than rewards. And keep ministerial perks low as well to keep to the overall theme of austerity and service.

Next, keep the promise to fight corruption. If anyone is tainted, just reject them and ask for more names from the partners in the unity coalition. It is imperative that the cabinet is a good one, otherwise, it will have a tough time taking off. A good engine is absolutely necessary for a successful launch.

Now for the numbers. This is easy - just go by proportional number of seats. The total number of seats of the three coalition components is 135. Harapan has 82 or 61 percent, similarly Umno/BN 22 percent and GPS 17 percent. The respective number of cabinet members works out to 13 Harapan, five Umno/BN and four GPS. That makes a cabinet of 22, because of rounding errors, with perhaps two more for Sabah, making it 24.

Add to each ministry a deputy minister and a parliamentary secretary. No more.

As the largest party among the three by far, it is right that Harapan leads and that it gets most of the major cabinet positions. But it needs to be inclusive and take cognisance of the legitimate interests of those that Umno/BN, GPS and the Sabah ministers represent.



If that is done then this will be a stable government and there will be no problem ahead in the next five years if everyone listens and if everyone talks.

The main thing is to get the cabinet to act as one. This will involve a coordinating minister, probably the best is the finance minister, and a coordinating unit to ensure cross-ministry efforts are all working together and in the same direction.

The days when ministries act as fiefdoms of their ministers must be totally banished and accountability, responsibility and governance must be put in place. Cabinet meetings should be more than once a week and there should be working committees across ministries.

This way, there is a check and balance to what ministries and ministers can do and they will always reflect the aspirations of the cabinet as a whole and the inner kitchen cabinet. All these, hopefully, will reflect the broad aspirations of the people.

Finally, it will be necessary to harness all the resources of the civil service, use them to the maximum and pool together the vast human capabilities within the service for the benefit of the nation.

In other words, ministers should work with the civil service and use their expertise to the full.

And perhaps the PM should not have a portfolio but be a busybody and involve himself in all the portfolios to see that they are all moving in the overall correct direction.

If this is done, we Malaysians can look forward to the setting up of the necessary infrastructure to take this country up to the next level and move beyond the middle-income trap.



P GUNASEGARAM, a former editor at online and print news publications, and head of equity research, is an independent writer and analyst.



Election of Speaker first on agenda for Dec 19 Dewan sitting




Election of Speaker first on agenda for Dec 19 Dewan sitting


Azhar Harun is the current Dewan Rakyat Speaker. (Bernama pic)


PETALING JAYA: The election of the Dewan Rakyat Speaker for the new Parliament term is first on the agenda when the lower house convenes for two days from Dec 19.

Azhar Harun is the current Dewan Rakyat Speaker.


In a notice to MPs, Dewan Rakyat secretary Nizam Mydin Bacha Mydin said the next item after the Speaker’s election is the swearing-in of the newly elected MPs.

The MPs will then vote on the appointment of the new deputy speakers.

It will be followed by a procedural motion for the inspector-general of police to ensure MPs were not hindered from going to and from Parliament, a motion of confidence in Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, as well as government bills and businesses.

Azhar was appointed the Dewan Rakyat Speaker in July 2020, with much furore in the lower house.

The former Election Commission chief was the Muhyiddin Yassin-led government’s sole candidate for the post after a motion for then speaker Ariff Yusof to vacate his post was passed.

Opposition MPs did not nominate anyone for the post in protest.


Malaysian Bar welcomes Ruler’s call to strip PM of power to appoint panel members who decide on judges




Malaysian Bar welcomes Ruler’s call to strip PM of power to appoint panel members who decide on judges




Malaysian Bar president Karen Cheah Yee Lyn called the advice for JAC reforms timely, noting that the call to amend the law that empowers the prime minister to appoint five out of nine members in the JAC started more than four years ago. — Picture by Choo Choy May.

Thursday, 01 Dec 2022 1:34 PM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 1 — The Malaysian Bar welcomed today the proposal by Negri Sembilan Ruler Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir to boost the courts’ independence by reducing the prime minister’s power to appoint members of the Judicial Appointments Committee (JAC).


Its president Karen Cheah Yee Lyn called the advice for JAC reforms timely, noting that the call to amend the law that empowers the prime minister to appoint five out of nine members in the JAC started more than four years ago.

“The Malaysian Bar has always had concerns relating to the process of the appointment of judges, which should always be free from the influence of the Executive, because the underlying purpose behind the establishment of a JAC is to maintain the separation between the Legislative, Judiciary, and Executive to ensure transparency at all levels,” she said in a statement.


She said the Malaysian Bar had since 2018 submitted a comprehensive paper to the Institutional Reforms Committee (IRC) to propose ideas to reduce political interference and strengthen the democratic institutions within Malaysia.


As chairman of the 260th meeting of the Conference of Rulers yesterday, Tuanku Muhriz proposed the removal of the prime minister’s role in appointing members of the JAC, a panel which nominates prospective new judges.

He had stressed on the importance of keeping enforcement agencies and the judiciary independent and free from external influence.

The Malaysian Bar said it had submitted more than 60 working papers to “initiate progress in working towards a matured and truly democratic nation”, among them a paper advocating the review of the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009.

The body had also advocated for a more inclusive JAC, one that should reflect the country's diversity. “This means an inclusion of the wide spectrum of Malaysia’s rich multicultural and multireligious population, and a reflection of a good balance of the genders and professional practice areas,” Cheah said.

The JAC has nine members, four of whom are the most senior judges in Malaysia, while the remaining five are appointed by the prime minister.

The Malaysian Bar had warned that the selection of eminent persons leaves open the possibility that former members of the executive and public service, members of Parliament and other politicians may sit on the JAC, which could lead to political interference.

“The Malaysian Bar reiterates yet again that the powers of the PM in the judicial selection and appointment process under the JAC Act be removed, so as to ensure independence of the JAC to run its own affairs, and that a Parliamentary Select Committee on key matters be possibly involved to provide check and balance.

“These reforms would be necessary to uphold the independence of the Judiciary,” Cheah said.


BN in unity govt because of trust, Puad tells Wan




BN in unity govt because of trust, Puad tells Wan


Umno leader Puad Zarkashi (left) says Bersatu’s Wan Saiful Wan Jan is wrong to state that the new government is unstable and can be threatened at any time by BN.


PETALING JAYA: Barisan Nasional’s participation in the Anwar Ibrahim-led unity government is based on trust, says Umno Supreme Council member Puad Zarkashi.

On the other hand, the Umno leader claimed that Perikatan Nasional chairman Muhyiddin Yassin accepted BN’s support for his government in 2020 with “vengeful intentions”.


“(Muhyiddin) wanted to kill Umno. That is why he could only be prime minister for 17 months. It was his own mistake. His ‘scheme of things’ failed,” Puad said in a Facebook post today.

The phrase “scheme of things” first surfaced in a leaked audio recording allegedly made during a Bersatu Supreme Council meeting in 2020.

In the recording, a man said to be Muhyiddin is heard proposing that Bersatu shore up its position by joining forces with Umno to form Malaysia’s largest Malay political party, with offers of positions in government-linked companies made to Umno as an incentive.

Last night, Bersatu information chief Wan Saiful Wan Jan said Anwar’s government was unstable and could be threatened at any time by BN.

He said the situation was the same during the PN government under Muhyiddin’s leadership, and the government made up of PN and BN ministers led by Umno vice-president Ismail Sabri Yaakob.

Wan Saiful also said he was proud that PN chose to remain in the opposition and not put aside its principles, adding that it was unlike PH, which was willing to reach a compromise with BN.

But Puad said the anti-hopping law had “saved” PN, claiming that many of its MPs would have already hopped over if not for the new legislation.

“The clear evidence is that PN could not stop Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) from backing Anwar as prime minister, when several GRS MPs are members of Bersatu, which is a component of PN,” he said.


Will Pakatan, BN clash in state polls? And how will it affect the unity govt? Analysts explain




Will Pakatan, BN clash in state polls? And how will it affect the unity govt? Analysts explain




PH and BN have no choice but to work together as the alternative could leave either in the incongruous situation of needing to partner with PN to form a state government, say analysts. — Picture by Farhan Najib

Thursday, 01 Dec 2022 7:00 AM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 1 — Pakatan Harapan (PH) and Barisan Nasional’s (BN) collaboration in the national unity government could be tested in the six state elections next year, as they must choose between straight fights with Perikatan Nasional (PN) and engaging in free-for-alls.

With the two now allied in the federal government, the latter approach could have repercussions to the partnership that allowed PH chairman Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to become prime minister ahead of PN’s Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.


University of Malaya Centre for Democracy and Elections (UMcedel) research fellow Awang Azman Awang Pawi said PH and BN should carry out seat negotiations over the state elections in Selangor, Penang, Negri Sembilan, Kedah, Kelantan and Terengganu “to ensure a more strategic long-term relationship”.

To avoid seat clashes, he suggested they use the last state election results to decide whether PH or BN will be the one contesting against PN, based on the number of votes each coalition garnered then.


“If it is a PN seat, for example, the one that should contest is the second-highest in terms of votes. If in constituency A which was won by PN, the second-highest is BN, the third-highest is PH, then BN will contest in constituency A,” he said in giving a hypothetical example.


Awang Azman said PH and BN have no choice but to work together as the alternative could leave either in the incongruous situation of needing to partner with PN to form a state government.

He said PH and BN would also be disadvantaged if they clash in state elections as their votes would be split, which could result in lower chances against PN and trigger a backlash from their supporters.

Overlaps could also create an “uncomfortable” atmosphere that could poison their ties in the federal government, he said.

“Clashes in the states will cause enmity due to political campaigns and be carried on to the national level. This will become a nightmare for both,” he said, having said that an existing framework of cooperation at the federal level — if there is one — should be followed at the state level.



It would be premature to judge how closely the two former rivals will be able to cooperate on such challenging topics given that the partnership in the national unity government was also still very new, said Oh Ei Sun. — Picture courtesy of Oh Ei Sun




Oh Ei Sun, senior fellow of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs, suggested it was too early to tell how the national unity government may be affected if PH and BN do not work out seat allocations for the six state elections.

While it would be ideal to divide the seats nearly between the two coalitions, Oh said this was “easier said than done” as it would need the unanimous agreement of all components on both sides.

“The leaders of, let’s say, PH and BN might agree to allocate seats, but they will have internal upheavals within their own coalition,” he said.

PKR, DAP and Parti Amanah Negara may disagree if they suddenly had to give up state seats they considered to be theirs to counterparts in BN and vice-versa, he said.

The partnership in the national unity government was also still very new, he said, making it premature to judge how closely the two former rivals will be able to cooperate on such challenging topics.

“I think this is very early on in the coalition building between PH and BN, and I think at this point, the focus is on for example, formation of Cabinet and allocation of ministerial positions, and so on.

“But of course, after that, they will seriously need to think of those state elections, and in particular also whether they would allocate seats among themselves to avoid clashes or is it a free for all.”

Asked if the national unity government might collapse if PH and BN clash in the six state polls, Oh said: “Certainly, at least a feeling of queasiness between the two coalition partners, just like between PN and BN not long ago.”



Datuk Jayum Jawan said PH would need to prove itself by showing it is capable of taking over states such as Negri Sembilan, Kedah, Kelantan and Terengganu in order to be ‘the next force in Malaysian politics’. — Picture by Miera Zulyana




Datuk Jayum Jawan, professor of political sciences at Universiti Putra Malaysia, believed the cooperation at the federal level would not extend to the state elections as every political party would want to establish itself.

Jayum said there is “no reason for PH to cooperate with anybody” in the upcoming state polls, pointing out that the current unity government is just a “convenient arrangement because none of the main bloc won a simple majority” in the recent 15th general election (GE15).

“PH and PKR under the leadership of the much-awaited and popular PM is expected to go alone and secure their mandate,” he said, adding that public acceptance of PH under PM Anwar is expected to improve now that it is helming the federal government.

He said PH “going alone” into the state elections would probably be the best option, as voters may otherwise think that PH is not serious about reformation when many BN leaders are still held in disrepute.

“Partnering outside the PH bloc would mean salvaging the declining support of some parties that PH members such as PKR and DAP may not want to agree to,” the Academy of Sciences Malaysia fellow said.

With PKR and DAP holding sway in Selangor and Penang, respectively, Jayum said PH would need to prove itself by showing it is capable of taking over states such as Negri Sembilan, Kedah, Kelantan and Terengganu in order to be “the next force in Malaysian politics”.

“Even increasing its presence there would be a step forward in reaching out to the Malay states/ electorates and as a precondition that it is capable to take over the role that Umno once had in the peninsula and from PAS that has proven to be a dominant political force in the East Coast states,” he said.

Although he viewed the national unity government to be a fragile one, Jayum believed that it could remain intact even if PH and BN were to clash in state elections.

He also said it would be better if the two coalitions contested openly and freely against each other despite their partnership in the federal government, as this would make it clear which should then go on to head the states.

After the prime minister at the time, Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob, dissolved Parliament to trigger GE15, PH and PN refused to dissolve the assemblies of Selangor, Penang, Negri Sembilan, Kelantan, Terengganu, and Kedah.

The decision meant these six states must hold their respective elections next year as the terms of their legislative assemblies will expire.


Churches laud Malay Rulers for urging political leaders to stop fanning racial, religious hatred




Churches laud Malay Rulers for urging political leaders to stop fanning racial, religious hatred




The CCM pointed out that the institution of constitutional monarchy has been 'a great blessing' to Malaysia. — Bernama pic

Thursday, 01 Dec 2022 10:15 AM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 1 — The Council of Churches Malaysia (CCM) today thanked the Conference of Rulers for urging political parties to refrain from inciting racial disharmony following the conclusion of the 15th general election (GE15).

It also lauded the Yang di-Pertuan Agong for promoting what it termed "politics of reconciliation and unity" to replace toxic politics, subsequently preparing Malaysia for a phase of coalition politics.


"The CCM welcomes, with respect and gratitude, the decree of the Conference of Rulers that leaders of political parties are to cease and desist raising racial and religious issues to instigate or incite the public.

"The decrees of their Majesties for the government to instil the spirit of equality among the people and to emphasise the Rukunegara as the basis of Malaysian society are also timely and vital for the full functioning of the Malaysian polity under a unity government," it general secretary Reverend Jonathan Jesudas said in a statement.


The CCM also pointed out how the institution of constitutional monarchy has been "a great blessing to the nation".


"In the past few years, we have seen how the leadership and counsel of their Majesties, the Malay Rulers, individually, and jointly as the Conference of Rulers. have ameliorated and moderated the excesses of acrimonious party politics in Malaysia," Jesudas said.

He also expressed the prayers of the churches in the CCM will be with the nation, their Majesties and the various branches of government of Malaysia.

The CCM is an ecumenical fellowship of churches and Christian organisations in the country, and is one of the three constituent members of the umbrella coalition Christian Federation of Malaysia.

CCM's statement comes after Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negri Sembilan Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir decreed yesterday that the Malay rulers are calling for political leaders to cease and desist from raising religious issues to flame public anger after chairing the 260th Conference of Rulers.

A Flourish election chart

The conference came following a divisive GE15 which saw ethnoreligious rhetoric amped up by political coalitions, especially Perikatan Nasional (PN) and its component Islamist party PAS during campaigning.

Centre for Independent Journalism’s Social Media Monitoring Initiative had pointed to PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang as what it called “one of the key amplifiers of divisive, racist, intolerant and hate-based narratives”, while the initiative #KamiNampak categorised one of Hadi's remarks as “public incitement to genocide” as it contains elements that justify the erasure of individuals based on identity-based characteristics.

Social media users also pointed to TikTok posts warning about a possible repeat of the deadly May 13, 1969 race riots, carrying anti-Chinese messages, threatening violence, and questioning the religiosity of Malay-Muslims who voted for DAP.


Most of them were directed against supporters of Pakatan Harapan and some were affiliated with PN.

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission and the police have since summoned the management of TikTok after Malaysiakini reported that at least three such videos were published on the platform as part of “paid partnerships”.

PAS and PN continue to question the formation of the coalition government between Pakatan Harapan and Barisan Nasional, believing that they should instead form the government despite not possessing the support of the majority of the Dewan Rakyat.

PAS has since attempted to undermine the PH administration by attacking component DAP with accusations that the party is Islamophobic and a "parasite" that will ruin the "Malay unity" government.


MCMC, police haul up TikTok over sponsored ‘May 13’ videos




MCMC, police haul up TikTok over sponsored ‘May 13’ videos




The commission said the video sharing platform was summoned over a news portal’s report that found at least three such criminally provocative videos were paid to be promoted to viewers on the service. — Reuters pic

Wednesday, 30 Nov 2022 10:36 PM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 30 — The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) said it and the police have summoned the management of TikTok to explain videos warning that the May 13, 1969 race riots could repeat on the platform.

The commission said the video sharing platform was summoned over a news portal’s report that found at least three such criminally provocative videos were paid to be promoted to viewers on the service.


“Spreading such videos is an irresponsible act that can cause disharmony, division, and feelings of hatred and prejudice in issues related to race and religion,” the MCMC said in a statement today.

The commission said it will work closely with the police to investigate and curtail videos that may disrupt the public order.


Previously, news portal Malaysiakini reported that at least three such videos were published on the platform as part of “paid partnerships”.


The police have warned the public against uploading content that would threaten public safety and order, after some internet users began exposing the distribution of videos threatening or referring to the May 13 riots following the result of the 15th general election.