OPINION | Umno’s Solo Gamble for GE16: A Risky Leap or a Calculated Path Back to Power?
14 Mar 2026 • 8:00 AM MYT
Kpost
Operation Consultant who is a keen observer of politics and current affairs
Photo Credit: Kosmo , Graphic Image by GeminiAi
As Malaysia slowly inches toward the next general election, political parties are already positioning themselves for what promises to be another fiercely contested battle.
Among the boldest declarations so far comes from Barisan Nasional (BN), which reportedly aims to contest at least 115 parliamentary seats in the upcoming 16th General Election (GE16). The move is seen as an attempt to reassert its relevance and signal that BN is not merely a junior partner within the current unity government led by Pakatan Harapan (PH).
But political analysts warn that such ambitions may be far more optimistic than realistic.
At the heart of BN’s strategy lies Umno, the coalition’s backbone and once-dominant political force in Malaysia. While Umno has enjoyed several morale-boosting victories in recent by-elections, analysts caution that these wins may not accurately reflect the broader national political landscape.
Mazlan Ali of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia argues that Umno’s recent successes were not solely due to its own strength. Instead, they were heavily influenced by support from PH voters and the mobilisation of federal government machinery during those contests.
“Umno’s victories were also influenced by other factors such as the contribution of votes from Pakatan Harapan supporters,” Mazlan noted, adding that by-elections often produce very different dynamics compared to nationwide polls.
This reality raises questions about whether Umno truly has the grassroots strength required to reclaim dominance - particularly in Malay-majority states where PAS has consolidated its influence.
PAS remains a formidable force across states such as Kelantan, Terengganu, and Kedah. In these regions, Umno’s ability to challenge the Islamist party remains uncertain. Despite decades of political experience, the once-dominant Malay party still struggles to rebuild voter trust after its defeat in the historic 2018 election and the turbulent years that followed.
The situation becomes even more complicated for BN’s smaller component parties.
Mazlan warned that MCA and MIC could suffer the most if BN and PH decide to contest against each other in the next election. With non-Malay voters continuing to gravitate toward PH - particularly the Democratic Action Party (DAP) - these component parties risk further erosion of their electoral relevance.
He said that as long as non-Malay voters still support PH, especially DAP, the performance of MCA and MIC will continue to decline like in the last elections.
Yet despite these challenges, some analysts believe BN’s strategy may not be entirely unrealistic.
Azmi Hassan of Akademi Nusantara described BN’s 115-seat target as ambitious but still possible within Malaysia’s 222-seat parliamentary system. Under such a scenario, PH would retain about 107 seats while BN focuses on reclaiming ground in Malay-majority constituencies - particularly in states currently influenced by PAS.
Azmi also highlighted growing tensions within Perikatan Nasional (PN), pointing to factional disputes between PAS and Bersatu as well as internal friction within Bersatu itself.
He noted that PN is in disarray, and BN is bold in its decision to go solo.
Indeed, Umno’s calculation may be less about outright victory and more about strategic survival.
Even if the party wins only a modest number of seats, it could still emerge as a kingmaker in a fragmented parliament - something that has become increasingly common in Malaysia’s post-2018 political landscape. In such a scenario, Umno would still have the flexibility to negotiate alliances with whichever coalition secures the largest bloc of seats.
For Umno, therefore, going solo may not be a reckless gamble but a calculated political maneuver.
After all, in Malaysia’s era of coalition politics, losing an election outright no longer necessarily means losing power.
Among the boldest declarations so far comes from Barisan Nasional (BN), which reportedly aims to contest at least 115 parliamentary seats in the upcoming 16th General Election (GE16). The move is seen as an attempt to reassert its relevance and signal that BN is not merely a junior partner within the current unity government led by Pakatan Harapan (PH).
But political analysts warn that such ambitions may be far more optimistic than realistic.
At the heart of BN’s strategy lies Umno, the coalition’s backbone and once-dominant political force in Malaysia. While Umno has enjoyed several morale-boosting victories in recent by-elections, analysts caution that these wins may not accurately reflect the broader national political landscape.
Mazlan Ali of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia argues that Umno’s recent successes were not solely due to its own strength. Instead, they were heavily influenced by support from PH voters and the mobilisation of federal government machinery during those contests.
“Umno’s victories were also influenced by other factors such as the contribution of votes from Pakatan Harapan supporters,” Mazlan noted, adding that by-elections often produce very different dynamics compared to nationwide polls.
This reality raises questions about whether Umno truly has the grassroots strength required to reclaim dominance - particularly in Malay-majority states where PAS has consolidated its influence.
PAS remains a formidable force across states such as Kelantan, Terengganu, and Kedah. In these regions, Umno’s ability to challenge the Islamist party remains uncertain. Despite decades of political experience, the once-dominant Malay party still struggles to rebuild voter trust after its defeat in the historic 2018 election and the turbulent years that followed.
The situation becomes even more complicated for BN’s smaller component parties.
Mazlan warned that MCA and MIC could suffer the most if BN and PH decide to contest against each other in the next election. With non-Malay voters continuing to gravitate toward PH - particularly the Democratic Action Party (DAP) - these component parties risk further erosion of their electoral relevance.
He said that as long as non-Malay voters still support PH, especially DAP, the performance of MCA and MIC will continue to decline like in the last elections.
Yet despite these challenges, some analysts believe BN’s strategy may not be entirely unrealistic.
Azmi Hassan of Akademi Nusantara described BN’s 115-seat target as ambitious but still possible within Malaysia’s 222-seat parliamentary system. Under such a scenario, PH would retain about 107 seats while BN focuses on reclaiming ground in Malay-majority constituencies - particularly in states currently influenced by PAS.
Azmi also highlighted growing tensions within Perikatan Nasional (PN), pointing to factional disputes between PAS and Bersatu as well as internal friction within Bersatu itself.
He noted that PN is in disarray, and BN is bold in its decision to go solo.
Indeed, Umno’s calculation may be less about outright victory and more about strategic survival.
Even if the party wins only a modest number of seats, it could still emerge as a kingmaker in a fragmented parliament - something that has become increasingly common in Malaysia’s post-2018 political landscape. In such a scenario, Umno would still have the flexibility to negotiate alliances with whichever coalition secures the largest bloc of seats.
For Umno, therefore, going solo may not be a reckless gamble but a calculated political maneuver.
After all, in Malaysia’s era of coalition politics, losing an election outright no longer necessarily means losing power.
No comments:
Post a Comment