Loh Siew Hong’s children remain Hindus as Federal Court shuts down Perlis govt’s last attempt to validate conversion

Loh Siew Hong’s children remain Hindus as Federal Court shuts down Perlis govt’s last attempt to validate conversion



Loh Siew Hong and her lawyer at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, April 8, 2025. The Federal Court today struck down the Perlis state government’s final attempt to argue why the three children of Hindu mother Loh should be recognised as Muslims, despite their previous conversion being ruled illegal. — Picture by Sayuti Zanudin

Tuesday, 08 Apr 2025 4:04 PM MYT


PUTRAJAYA, April 8 — The Federal Court today struck down the Perlis state government’s final attempt to argue why the three children of Hindu mother Loh Siew Hong should be recognised as Muslims, despite their previous conversion being ruled illegal.

A three-member panel chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim delivered the unanimous decision alongside Federal Court judges Datuk Nordin Hassan and Datuk Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera.

Today’s decision follows an application filed by the Perlis state government last year to review its decision denying them leave to appeal the appellate court’s ruling on the conversion of Loh’s three children to Islam without her consent.

The latest ruling effectively endorsed an earlier Federal Court decision which had in May 2024 unanimously decided against the Perlis Islamic Religious and Malay Customs Council (MAIPs), the Perlis government, and other respondents in the years-long legal battle to have the children’s conversion to Islam declared unconstitutional.

“We find no merit in the review application as the applicant has not met the threshold under Rule 137 of Rules of the Federal Court 1995.

“Therefore Enclosure 1 (application for review) is dismissed with no cost,” she said.

Loh previously challenged the children’s conversion in 2022, losing initially at the High Court but later winning at the Court of Appeal and Federal Court.

On May 14, 2024, the Federal Court reaffirmed the binding Indira Gandhi precedent requiring both parents’ consent for child conversions.

The Perlis state government then filed an application on October 29, 2024 to review the Federal Court’s decision.

In its application, it is seeking a review by a new panel, claiming its right to be heard was “severely compromised”.

It wants the Federal Court’s May 2024 panel — chaired by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat — decision for refusal to be set aside and the leave application reheard, or for leave to appeal to be granted directly.

Rule 137 of the Rules of the Federal Court 1995 recognises the Federal Court’s inherent power to review its previous decisions in order to prevent an injustice or an abuse of process, and it has been mostly used to set aside Federal Court’s decisions.

Ultimately, Perlis wants the Federal Court to hear its full appeal to argue the conversion should be declared valid.

In May 2024, the Federal Court said the Court of Appeal’s decision to invalidate the three children’s conversion was correct, noting Perlis’ arguments would encourage the “unconstitutional practice of unilateral conversion to persist”.

In short, this means the children remain Hindus and the unilateral conversion illegal.