Putin threatens UK with new ballistic missile as Ukraine war escalates
The UK government confirmed that Russia had, for the first time, used a ballistic missile with a range of ‘several thousand’ kilometres
David Hughes
Saturday 23 November 2024 13:38 GMT
Putin suggested the missile could be used to hit Kyiv’s allies who have given Ukraine permission to use Western-supplied weapons to hit targets within Russia (AP)
Russian President Vladimir Putin threatened to strike the UK with a new ballistic missile after using the weapon to hit a target in Ukraine.
Downing Street condemned Mr Putin for further escalating the conflict by using a ballistic missile with a range of “several thousand kilometres” against the city of Dnipro.
Mr Putin suggested the missile could be used to hit Kyiv’s allies who have given Ukraine permission to use Western-supplied weapons to hit targets within Russia.
The UK is believed to have allowed its Storm Shadow missiles to be used by Ukrainian forces within the Kursk region of Russia, while the US has given permission for its ATACMS weapons to be fired at targets in Mr Putin’s country.
Mr Putin confirmed Russia has tested a new intermediate-range weapon, saying it came in response to Ukrainian strikes on the Russian territory with US and British missiles earlier this week.
The Russian leader declared that Russia would issue advance warnings before strikes on other countries to allow civilians to evacuate to safety.
“In response to the use of American and British long-range weapons on November 21 of this year, the Russian armed forces launched a combined strike on one of the facilities of the Ukrainian defence industry,” Mr Putin said in a televised address.
“One of the newest Russian medium-range missile systems was tested in combat conditions, in this case, with a ballistic missile in a non-nuclear hypersonic warhead.”
He added: “We consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities.”
The US said the weapon was a new, experimental intermediate-range missile based on Russia’s existing RS-26 Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile.
In Westminster, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “My understanding is that it is the first time that Russia has used a ballistic missile in Ukraine with a range of several thousand kilometres.”
No 10 said it was “an example of escalatory behaviour from Russia”.
(PA Graphics)
But the Prime Minister’s spokesman added it “only serves to strengthen our resolve and to ensure that Ukraine has what it needs to act in self-defence against Russia’s reckless and illegal invasion”.
Defence SecretaryJohn Healey said: “Since the illegal invasion of Ukraine began, Russia has consistently and irresponsibly escalated the conflict while Ukraine continues to fight in self-defence for a democratic future.
“Today’s ballistic missile attack is yet another example of Putin’s recklessness.”
The missile’s range far outstrips that of newly authorised US and British supplied weapons.
The distance from Moscow to London is around 2,500km, suggesting the range of the new missile could threaten the UK.
Russia’s military claims it has shot down two British-made Storm Shadow missiles, following reports that debris from the weapons had been discovered in the country’s Kursk region, where Ukrainian forces have launched an incursion.
Mr Healey earlier revealed to a committee of MPs that the UK knew Russia had been “preparing for months” to fire a new ballistic missile.
(PA Graphics)
Mr Healey warned Ukraine faces a “serious moment” in its defence against Mr Putin’s invasion, but refused to confirm that Kyiv had been given permission to use Storm Shadow in Russia.
Downing Street and the Ministry of Defence have repeatedly declined to comment publicly on the use of Storm Shadow.
“It risks both operational security and in the end the only one that benefits from such a public debate is President Putin,” the Defence Secretary told MPs.
Battle lines in Ukraine are now “less stable than at any time since the early days of the full-scale Russian invasion”, Mr Healey said, citing British intelligence.
Speaking at the same time, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer told the House of Commons the UK “will not be deterred or distracted by reckless threats” from Mr Putin, who has lowered the threshold for using his nuclear arsenal.
Sir Keir also insisted that all the UK’s support for Kyiv was “in accordance with international law” and “always for self-defence”.
The head of the UK’s armed forces visited Ukraine to discuss the country’s military needs.
Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky met Chief of the Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin in Kyiv.
Mr Zelensky said: “We discussed defence co-operation between Ukraine and the United Kingdom, focusing on developing and enhancing the technological capabilities of the armed forces of Ukraine.
“Particular attention was given to Ukraine’s current military needs and the continued support from our partners.”
Britain has 4 Vanguard-class Ballistic Missile submarines, at least 1 which is always on patrol, 365 days a year, undetectable "somewhere" in the ocean depths.
ReplyDeleteEach is armed with 16 Trident Thermonuclear missiles, each with 4 independently targetable thermonuclear warheads. Sufficient deterrence against Russki nuclear blackmail
because , if Russkis attack UK with nuclear ICBMs, the 16x4 Trident thermonuclear warheads are sufficient to send Russia back to before the Dinosaur Age.
Wakakakaka…
DeleteDo u know how OLD r those Vanguard-class Ballistic Missile submarines?
Have those Trident Thermonuclear missiles, each with 4 independently targetable thermonuclear warheads been seriously maintained & serviced?
Looking at pommie's service records of her latest aircraft carrier, bet yr wet dream that those Vanguard-class Ballistic Missile submarines r in retiring & mothballing states of various deterioration.
Oooop… u ain't know for yr inconsequential farts of thin air!
Really rich coming from a China Communist fool.
DeleteChina's super-duper submarine fleet lost two submarines this year.
One in the Gulf of Bohai , caught in a China own created trap intended to snare and sink Wankee submarines.
Instant karma.
China Communist Party attpted to suppress all news about the loss, until the mothers of those lost at sea started posting demands to know what happened to their sons, including Chinese language forums hosted.outside China - which the CCP couldn't censor.
The other submarine was lost at a Dock on the Yangtze River. Likely undergoing some maintenance or resupply, the sub just sank, but reportedly no major loss of lives.
The Chinese Communits.Party couldn't suppress this one because major operation to reflect the submarine.was impossible to hide from.
satellites, including commercial satellites.
Wakakakaka…
DeleteTalking about fake farts from u. Especially those about yr pet hatred - China!
China's super-duper submarine fleet lost two submarines this year - wow…wow…
Where r yr concrete & substantiable evidences?
Protesting emails from deceased family members? -Especially those from outside China proper! Where r the verifiable 3rd sources etc etc?
Sinking submarine under repair? For yr know nothingness, repaired vessel - submarine included - is always done on dry dock. So where r the sinking water coming from?
Ooop… yr diarrhea!
It could be carrying something real significant that can create a false flag event that blame RU, but got taken out before damage can be done...just speculating only.
ReplyDeletehttps://x.com/Zlatti_71/status/1860960706448838794?s=19
🇱🇹 DHL plane crash in Lithuania could have been caused by a terrorist attack
Lithuanian police said they are also considering this version of the cargo plane crash, LRT reports. Technical problems could also have been the cause.
✖️ The head of the National Crisis Management Center Vilmantas Vitkauskas said that the plane did not fall on a residential building, but next to it. 12 residents were evacuated.
❗️ Vilnius authorities declared an "extreme situation" in the Boeing-737 crash zone in order to collect "hazardous substances." The plane's wreckage was scattered over a large area.
Ostashko reports