LETTER | Practising double standards in saving human lives
Pola Singh
LETTER | When it comes to saving human lives, are we practising double standards? Shouldn't every life be equally valued and important? Two recent maritime-related disasters shed light on the contrasting responses of the international community.
On June 18, the submersible named Titan went missing, carrying five individuals who held high positions, possessed great influence, and were exceptionally wealthy - often referred to as VVIPs.
Unfortunately, they were later confirmed dead after debris from the vessel was found near the wreckage of the Titanic. The initial response to this incident was overwhelming, with countries like the United States, Canada, and France swiftly joining the international search effort.
The world community recognised the significance of rescuing and preserving human lives, no matter the circumstances. However, despite the multinational rescue operation, the efforts were in vain as the five VVIPs had already perished due to an implosion that occurred on the day the Titan went missing.
In another tragic incident earlier that week, over 300 Pakistani nationals lost their lives when an overcrowded fishing trawler sank off the coast of Greece.
Half-hearted reaction
This event once again highlighted the refugee crisis faced by the European Union, as tens of thousands seek refuge from war, persecution, and poverty.
Greek authorities faced criticism for their alleged failure to rescue the hundreds of refugees and migrants aboard the vessel. This incident revealed a stark contrast in the international response where double standards were exposed.
Comparing the response to the tragedy near Greece with that of the Titan, it becomes evident that a lukewarm and half-hearted reaction from the international community prevailed in the former case.
Many, like the Greeks, seemed reluctant and hesitant to prioritise saving valuable lives. Unlike the swift and coordinated response witnessed in the Titan incident, the rescue efforts here were delayed, with each country pointing fingers at others to do more.
Unfortunately, due to this slow response, numerous lives were lost on board the trawler. The refugees certainly deserve better.
Universal commitment
Can we not treat every human life with dignity and equality, regardless of their social status, wealth, or nationality?
The international community must prioritise and support initiatives that foster a universal commitment to the sanctity of every human life.
Prominent past and present world leaders and world bodies can champion the cause of equal treatment for all individuals.
Saving human lives speedily, irrespective of race, creed, or nationality, should be something that all countries should internalise – to make this world a better place.
LETTER | When it comes to saving human lives, are we practising double standards? Shouldn't every life be equally valued and important? Two recent maritime-related disasters shed light on the contrasting responses of the international community.
On June 18, the submersible named Titan went missing, carrying five individuals who held high positions, possessed great influence, and were exceptionally wealthy - often referred to as VVIPs.
Unfortunately, they were later confirmed dead after debris from the vessel was found near the wreckage of the Titanic. The initial response to this incident was overwhelming, with countries like the United States, Canada, and France swiftly joining the international search effort.
The world community recognised the significance of rescuing and preserving human lives, no matter the circumstances. However, despite the multinational rescue operation, the efforts were in vain as the five VVIPs had already perished due to an implosion that occurred on the day the Titan went missing.
In another tragic incident earlier that week, over 300 Pakistani nationals lost their lives when an overcrowded fishing trawler sank off the coast of Greece.
Half-hearted reaction
This event once again highlighted the refugee crisis faced by the European Union, as tens of thousands seek refuge from war, persecution, and poverty.
Greek authorities faced criticism for their alleged failure to rescue the hundreds of refugees and migrants aboard the vessel. This incident revealed a stark contrast in the international response where double standards were exposed.
Comparing the response to the tragedy near Greece with that of the Titan, it becomes evident that a lukewarm and half-hearted reaction from the international community prevailed in the former case.
Many, like the Greeks, seemed reluctant and hesitant to prioritise saving valuable lives. Unlike the swift and coordinated response witnessed in the Titan incident, the rescue efforts here were delayed, with each country pointing fingers at others to do more.
Unfortunately, due to this slow response, numerous lives were lost on board the trawler. The refugees certainly deserve better.
Universal commitment
Can we not treat every human life with dignity and equality, regardless of their social status, wealth, or nationality?
The international community must prioritise and support initiatives that foster a universal commitment to the sanctity of every human life.
Prominent past and present world leaders and world bodies can champion the cause of equal treatment for all individuals.
Saving human lives speedily, irrespective of race, creed, or nationality, should be something that all countries should internalise – to make this world a better place.
Hiding behind the dipolar reactions to these two tradegies r the intrinsic cognitive nature of the capitalistic society.
ReplyDeleteThe 5 victims of the Titan r the rich & famous members of the top echelon of the rich society, using their fortune to seek thrills & fame!
Those Greece drowned illegal immigrants r down&trodden representatives of some poor & war-torn nations, trying to seek a new lives.
Richness is welcome with open arms. While poorness is rejected with closed mind.
Nothing comes in full cycle for that congenital theme of a full pledged demoNcracy.
The international standards are clear.
ReplyDeleteWhenever a life-threatening crisis at sea occurs, the primarily response responsibility lies with the nation or nations closest to the location.
So, for the Titan submersible case, the primary response authorities under international rules lay with USA and Canada -and so they did.
In the refugee case off the Greek coast, the primary responsibility lay with Greece.
So what the Fuck is this Pola Singh idiot talking about double standards ?
This POLA SINGH is a typical Left-wing Wanker IDIOT.