Malaysia's goosey goosey gander story

Najib has been regularly if not constantly accused of (sometimes) murdering Altantuyaa Shaariibuu, or (sometimes) being complicit in the murder of Altantuyaa, or (sometimes) having a wife who was involved in the murder of Altantuyaa, or (sometimes) having a wife who was at the murder scene to supervise the demolition of Altantuyaa's corpse, or (sometimes) the father of Altantuyaa's unborn baby ... so on so forth.

Initially his guilt was by grapevine accusative allusions, but which become more firm with the statutory declaration of a private investigator Perumal Balasubramaniam (Bala).

Bala made the accusation against Najib and even included a salacious titbit about Altantuyaa being partial to sex in her behind, this puerile information during a period when someone was accused again of sodomy (who knows whether the salacious titbit was to serve as some form of equalizing and/or compensating morality?).

It was a declaration based on he was allegedly told by Razak Baginda, who Bala said was in turn allegedly told by Najib, who Bala said was in turn allegedly told by Altantuyaa herself (the enjoyable 'in her behind' bit) - all these from a chain of information told by and known only by Bala.

Man suffered a lot, personally and financially
I wonder how he sustained his family and himself in India
as well as flying here and there
hope at least his children continue to attend good schooling
available at international schools in most countries
am not brilliant with house keeping expenses but I guess-timate
Bala needs at least RM20,000 a month - help him if you can

And that's why Najib is guilty as hell, until he can be proven innocent.

Furthermore, his guilt is 'confirmed' by his own silence on the allegations ... though I distinctively saw on TV Najib telling a western reporter (Australian, I believe) that there was no truth in the murder allegations.

But then, if we admit he wasn't silent about the accusations, it would f* up the desired depth of 'guilt' that we want people to see in him. So I suppose it's best we continue with the urban legend that Najib kept silent despite all the allegations and accusations.

Incidentally, is it true Najib had also sworn on the Qu'ran that he didn't have anything to do with Altantuyaa?

I can't be sure about this because I am a bit careful about touching on Muslim politicians swearing on Qu'ran as some politicians and a very new political party member have shown they have been leery of and possessed very distinctive disquiet dislike about swearing on the Qu'ran.

It's sad and also unfortunate for us that Indonesian former president (Gus Dur), who came to Malaysia during the Permatang Pauh by-election to enlighten us about swearing on the Qu'ran, had passed away, or you would be able to confirm with him if you don't believe me.

However, I did a bit of research on the taking of oath by the Qu’ran, and obtain the following:

Scholars, looking at the fact that the Qur’an is also an attribute of Allah, considered an oath taken by the Qur’an to be valid.

Imam al-Haskafi (Allah have mercy on him), said in his Durr: Kamal (ibn al-Humam, the great Hanafi Mujtahid) said: “Let it be known that the taking of an oath by the Qur’an is something that has become customary, thus it would be considered a valid oath.”

Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) explained the above by stating: “This is based on the fact that the Qur’an is the Speech of Allah, thus it will be considered to be one of His attributes.” (Radd al-Muhtar ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar, 3/712).

Anyway, let's move on regardless of whether Najib has sworn and others refused to swear on the Qu'ran, because as I have said, Najib is guilty until proven otherwise.

Besides, he has himself to blame for as we have been informed he has 'kept silent' on the slew of accusations against him ........ regardless of what had actually happened (his repudiations in TV interviews, etc).

Besides, Bala is the PKR's new G-D of 'truth' so there should not be any further argument against his 'revelations'.

He is not only a G-D of 'truth' but a hero who has been welcomed back to Malaysia in the last of his several trips back to Malaysia, wakakaka, by none other than Sivarasa Rasiah, The missing man in the Altantuyaa story, and garlanded by PKR members, a ceremonial honour reserved only for Anwar Ibrahim on the PKR side and Najib on the BN-UMNO side (used to be Mahathir, and Samy Vellu - oh how these two must have missed this form of adulation! wakakaka)

Sivarasa about to garland Bala - 'thunderous applause' please

To borrow and paraphrase one of Mr Americk Singh Sidhu's wonderful erudite brilliant phrases on truth, "Bala has said so".

And the G-D of 'truth' just proclaimed to us His 11th Commandment, that "We cannot simply send two innocent policemen to the gallows."

Innocent? But then, he's a G-D, isn't he?

Meanwhile, RPK has made allegations of Bala issuing his first SD following an alleged financial inducement to do so from Anwar Ibrahim for the princely sum of RM700,000 - see RPK's The Deepak-Bala marriage: in Deepak’s own words.

Has Anwar denied this silly allegation by RPK? As far as I can gather, Anwar has been deafeningly silent.

Look, maybe the Great Man might not even be aware.

Can someone please please please inform him to do so as soon as possible as he may be in danger of falling into the same situation as Najib, that is, for not repudiating the adverse allegations against him (though of course in Najib's case, he did repudiate the allegations against him on the murder of Altantuyaa in an interview with an Australian reporter, and as I was informed, swore on the Qu'ran he wasn't involved in her murder).

And then there was the rather overt, aggressively in-your-face and inflammatory accusations against Anwar Ibrahim by Yuktes Vijay as reported in Malaysia-Today's The real story of Anwar’s Sodomy 2 ( Part 1), which apart from information about the Saiful case, mentioned something about Astroboy and e-mails, presumably by someone to Astroboy, or vice versa?

Yes, can someone please please please inform Anwar to immediately deny this, or sue the sh*t out of Vijay, or at least lodged a complaint, a qazaf under Islamic law, with the Syariah Court against Yuktes Vijay.

Then it'd be beholden on the Syariah Court to probe into Vijay's undoubtedly ‘false allegations’.

Under syariah laws, Vijay will be required to produce four credible witnesses (must be all male) to back up his accusations of what happened to Saiful and where necessary, the alleged Astroboy.

If Vijay fails to do so, he will declared a fasid or unreliable person. The penalty is three years imprisonment, or a fine up to RM5,000, for bearing false witness.

What? Vijay is not a Muslim and has no standing or won't even be allowed to appear in the Syariah Court?

Well, that'll kowtim the whole silly allegations accusations by Vijay then. G-D is truly great.

Besides, there was a precedent for this which I blogged in cleaning the Augean stables.

Oh BTW, is there a PKR run restaurant somewhere? I feel like having roast gander tonight. I wonder whether it'll be as good as the roast goose I had last week? 

Goosey goosey gander,

Where shall I wander?

Up stairs and down stairs,

In the hypocrites' chamber?