
Navi Pillay, head of UN commission that accused Israel of genocide, wins Nobel Peace Prize
A meeting place to exchange views, no matter how different or diverse these may be. Keeping these civil and courteous would be appreciated

Navi Pillay, head of UN commission that accused Israel of genocide, wins Nobel Peace Prize




From Terence Netto
There is in sports parlance a saying that it is the last 50 metres that separates the men from the boys.
This piece of wisdom is relevant to the scene playing out as Bersama attempts to test its hypothetical strength in the upcoming Melaka polls and from there determine how it should shape up for GE16.
Properly speaking, Bersama should want to give the Melaka polls a miss, just as it did the one in Negri Sembilan where a poor showing in the earlier Johor polls caused the party to opt for a no-show barely three weeks later.
Bersama wants to contest 15 seats in Melaka, a decision that will place it in direct clashes with not only PKR but also DAP and Amanah.
This is folly.
Bersama’s forte is that it has Rafizi Ramli, the standard bearer by default of Anwar Ibrahim, of the reformasi movement.
The majority of supporters of the reformasi movement would endorse the notion that Rafizi can pick up the reins of that movement once Anwar is seen as of no more use to it.
Given that Anwar is 79 years old, the discovery about his nullity is not far off.
As there is no heir to Anwar in PKR — Nurul Izzah Anwar, for long a shaky proposition, having abruptly quit the deputy presidency and sauntered off centre stage — the focus on succession to the leadership of the reformasi movement inevitably shifts to Rafizi.
But he and Bersama will do themselves no favours by alienating reformasi supporters within the Pakatan Harapan (PH) fold.
The PH combine of PKR, DAP and Amanah is the core of the reformasi movement.
True, it has withered on the vine from the time Bersatu departed its fold in February 2020 and were joined by a batch of PKR dissidents led by Azmin Ali.
But the nucleus of the movement can regather and raise its banner once again.
Rafizi is best equipped for the role because of his analytical acuity and his penchant for simplifying complex problems and explaining them to the public.
But Rafizi should be wary of hubris; he knows a lot but shouldn’t think he knows it all.
Bersama should focus on what it conceivably can win in GE16.
This is the 10 or so parliamentary seats, from the 31 seats PKR won in GE15.
Presently, four to six of the seats are held by PKR dissidents favouring Rafizi and another four to six seats are occupied by MPs just biding their time in the party and awaiting the dissolution of Parliament to declare themselves for Bersama.
Being returned in those seats in GE16 will be Bersama’s biggest challenge.
If Bersama acquits itself of this challenge, it will be a big boost to Rafizi and his suitability to resurrect the fallen banner of reformasi.
At all costs, Bersama should avoid a scenario where in its quest to bite off more than it can chew, the party splits votes that would have gone to PKR, DAP or Amanah.
This will allow Umno or PAS to gain.
Both parties are not exactly opposed to the reformasi agenda but they are not keen on it either.
Bersama ought to avoid their deserved rise to prominence in the national political landscape be it at the expense of parties that belong to the broad coalition supportive of economic and institutional reform of the country.
A nuanced recognition of these realities separates the men from the boys in the struggle for reform.
Terence Netto is a senior journalist and an FMT reader.

Zara’s mother, Noraidah Lamat, said she proposed a meeting involving the hostel warden, the security guard, the senior students concerned and Zara to clarify the issues her daughter had raised.
However, she said Zara disagreed with the proposal, fearing reprisals from the senior students.
“My daughter stopped me. She said something like, ‘Please don’t do it, Mum. They might treat me even worse. They have a gang, a big gang, in the hostel,'” Noraidah, the 81st witness in the inquest into her daughter’s death, told coroner Amir Shah Amir Hassan.
Noraidah, 46, was responding to questions from lawyer Joan Goh, who represents one of the teenagers accused in the bullying case, about the steps she had taken after receiving complaints from her daughter concerning senior students at the hostel.
When asked why she had not met the school principal or warden to address the complaints, Noraidah said she continued to trust the school administration despite her daughter’s reluctance to let her intervene.
“I still trusted the school administration because it is a renowned school in Sabah… a religious school,” she said.
Goh said Zara’s complaints about problems with senior students were not isolated incidents, to which Noraidah agreed.
When asked why she had not approached the school authorities despite receiving repeated complaints, Noraidah said she never imagined that a serious bullying incident resulting in her daughter’s death could happen at the school.
Zara died at Queen Elizabeth Hospital on July 17, 2025, a day after she was found unconscious near a drain at her school dormitory in the early hours of the morning.
‘She wouldn’t have jumped’
Noraidah also said she did not believe that Zara, her only child, jumped from the third floor of the school building, saying the teenager was cheerful, strong and not one to give up easily.
Lawyer Ram Singh, also representing one of the teenagers charged in connection with the bullying case, referred to expert testimony given during earlier inquest proceedings indicating that Zara had not been pushed. He said there was a possibility that she had voluntarily jumped.
Noraidah said she did not believe her daughter would have made such a decision.
“To me, Zara was a cheerful, strong child who would not give up easily, no matter what provocation others subjected her to,” she said.
When asked to explain what she meant by provocation, Noraidah said: “It refers to the taunts, bullying and names they called her throughout her time at the hostel.”
Noraidah also dismissed the possibility that Zara had concealed emotional distress from her, saying she did not notice any change in her daughter’s behaviour before the incident, although Zara continued to recount the taunts and names used by senior students during their telephone conversations.
Noraidah said during their telephone call on July 14, Zara was still cheerful and excited, talking about a “Kak Badar” named Wana who wanted to meet her that night.
Regarding the investigation into Zara’s death, Noraidah claimed the police never gave her clear information, and that her WhatsApp messages to the investigating officer went unanswered.