Monday, September 30, 2024

Pope slams use of Israeli force in Middle East and calls for immediate ceasefire in Lebanon, Gaza as he denounces abuse cover-ups during thorny Belgium visit





Pope slams use of Israeli force in Middle East and calls for immediate ceasefire in Lebanon, Gaza as he denounces abuse cover-ups during thorny Belgium visit




Pope Francis talks to journalists on the flight back to Rome at the end of his four-day visit to Belgium and Luxembourg, September 29, 2024. — Reuters pic

Monday, 30 Sep 2024 10:39 AM MYT



BRUSSELS, Sept 30 — Pope Francis implored bishops not to cover up the sexual abuse of children, during an open-air mass on Sunday that capped a three-day visit to Belgium, which is still struggling with the legacy of past scandals.

Gathered in bright morning sunshine, about 40,000 faithful, some waving Belgian and Vatican flags, packed the King Baudouin stadium north of the capital to hear the 87-year-old pontiff.


“There is no place for abuse, there is no place for covering up abuse,” Francis said during a homily.

“I ask everyone not to cover up abuse, I ask the bishops not to cover up abuse, to condemn the abusers and help them heal themselves of this disease of abuse.”


During his stay, the pontiff was pressed by Belgian authorities and victims’ advocates on the Catholic Church’s handling of child sexual abuse, which was put back on the front pages by a hard-hitting documentary last year.


The Belgian documentary prompted around 200 more people to come forward with allegations that they were abused by members of the Church, adding to around 1,000 cases reported before then.

On Friday, Francis met with 17 victims. “I felt their suffering,” he told the Sunday mass.

“Evil must not be hidden, evil must be brought out into the open, let it be known,” he added, calling for all perpetrators to be judged.


Women and values

The programme of Sunday’s mass had to be changed at the last minute after it emerged that the closing hymn was composed by a priest accused of sexual abuse.

The blunder prompted the head of the Belgian bishops’ conference, Archbishop Luc Terlinden, to admit that the Church needed to better monitor cases and perpetrators.

While the question of abuse cast a shadow throughout his stay, the Argentine pontiff was given a rapturous welcome at Sunday’s mass, where young people and families cheered as he toured the venue in his Popemobile.

“He transmits all kinds of values,” Olivier Caillet, 44, from Brussels, said of the pope, praising his welcoming stance on migration.

“He’s a bit like the pope of surprises, he’s with the underprivileged... he’s opening up new possibilities, trying to change people’s consciences so that we don’t close borders like barriers.”

Belgium’s King Philippe and Queen Mathilde were also in attendance at the mass, which Francis used to appeal for an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon and the wider Middle East.

“I call on all parties to immediately cease fire in Lebanon, Gaza, the rest of Palestine and Israel,” the pontiff said, as Israel continued to target the Hezbollah armed group in Lebanon.

On the flight back to Rome, he slams the “immoral” use of force in the region.

“Defence must always be proportional to the attack. When this is not the case, a dominating tendency appears that goes beyond morality,” he told reporters travelling with him when asked about the effects of Israel strikes on civilians.

“Even in war there is a morality to defend. War is immoral, but the rules of war indicate a form of morality.”

Francis’s visit, the first by a pope to Belgium since John Paul II in 1995, also highlighted the growing disconnect between the Vatican and some faithful in progressive, secular countries over issues such as gender inequality.

On Saturday, he was challenged during a frank exchange with students about the place of women in the Church — after paying tribute to a former sovereign who took a public stance against abortion.

His response, describing women as daughters, sisters and mothers upset some, with the Catholic university hosting the meeting later expressing its “incomprehension and disapproval” at the reductive view.

“I don’t understand why women can’t become priests. It’s something that was established because it was rooted in society at the time, but now we’ve moved on,” Alice Vanwijnsberghe, an 18-year-old student, told AFP after attending a festival with 6,000 young Catholics.

During his traditional press conference on board the plane flying him back to Rome, the pontiff saluted former Belgian monarch King Baudouin’s bravery for opposing a law in favour of abortion in 1990.

“The king was courageous because faced with this murderous law, he did not sign, and he resigned,” the pope said. “That takes courage.” — AFP


The peace appeals of Israel’s Western enablers are a cynical charade

 

al Jazeera:


The peace appeals of Israel’s Western enablers are a cynical charade

For the West, Lebanese lives are as disposable as Palestinian lives. Its calls for a ceasefire are no more than a sham.

Smoke rises from Israeli airstrikes in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon, Saturday, Sept. 28, 2024. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)

Smoke rises after Israeli bombardment of Beirut's southern suburbs on September 28, 2024 [AP Photo/Hassan Ammar]



You cannot negotiate a ceasefire, let alone peace, with a man who prefers to wage war.

That is the conundrum facing a host of suddenly fretting Western leaders, led by retiring US President Joe Biden, who insist – publicly, at least – that they are working hard to prevent another, cataclysmic war from engulfing the Middle East.

Let’s pretend for a moment that their “concerns” are sincere. Then, these same Western leaders ought to acknowledge finally that they are, in large measure, responsible for that pressing conundrum.

Long before October 7, 2023, Biden and company have, at every turn, enabled, armed, and provided diplomatic cover for their “man” in Tel Aviv – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist government.

Netanyahu has reciprocated by telling the chumps in Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels, and Ottawa who, at every turn, have enabled, armed and provided him and his fanatical coalition government with diplomatic cover to – let me put this as politely as I can – take a hike.

True to obstinate form, Netanyahu has rebuffed efforts to arrange for a 21-day ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah with a view to crafting a more sustainable truce.

A strutting Netanyahu made his opposition to any brokered settlement plain in a typical “I am the toughest dude on the block” address to the United Nations General Assembly on Friday where he warned Iran that the “long arm of Israel” can “reach… the entire Middle East”.

The chumps in Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels, and Ottawa have feigned surprise and disappointment at Netanyahu’s grating intransigence. Now, belatedly, Biden et al want to play “peacemaker” when, all along, they have remained true to the West’s defining Middle East doctrine: Kill first, think later.

They have been joined lately in this predictable bit of chicanery by Western news organisations who, despite their history of blatant support for the disastrous “kill first, think later” policy, wish Netanyahu would cease what he has been doing with their explicit and hearty approval.

And if he can’t be stopped, some of them want him toppled to prevent “Lebanon from turning into Gaza”.

It’s too funny. Netanyahu – the saint turned apparent sinner – isn’t going anywhere. The bulk of Israelis support what their beloved prime minister has done and is doing in Gaza and the occupied West Bank with an evangelical thirst and zeal.

If it is necessary to bludgeon Lebanon until it resembles Gaza and cause the deaths of tens of thousands of innocents, well, so be it. The Lebanese “asked for it” and they’re going to get a stinging taste of “Israel’s wrath”, too.

Netanyahu isn’t going to “change course” because he is incapable of changing course. He knows that war is his golden ticket to remaining prime minister and, by convenient coincidence, helps him stave off those troublesome pending criminal indictments.

Time may also be his ally. Netanyahu is banking on former US President Donald Trump soon returning to the Oval Office. If that happens, America’s vacuous rhetorical reservations vis-à-vis his genocidal destruction of Gaza and planned invasion of Lebanon will evaporate.

Netanyahu is loath, as well, to hand Trump’s opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, a foreign policy “victory” on the eve of the presidential election.

Harris keeps repeating, like a metronome, that she and the president are “working around the clock” for a ceasefire between Hamas and Israel. It is a ridiculous pantomime and Harris, I suspect, realises it.

The chumps in Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels, and Ottawa embraced Netanyahu – knowing, full well, that their disagreeable man in Tel Aviv has had a lifelong allergy to diplomacy.

Still, they held him tight to their welcoming bosoms. And they told him, again and again, that he could, in effect, kill as many Palestinians as he wanted to, for as long as he wanted to, whenever he wanted to.

Lebanon’s fate was sealed in that instant. But the chumps in Washington, London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels and Ottawa didn’t possess the good sense or foresight to recognise what would inevitably follow.

Remember, these are supposed “statesmen” and “statewomen” who tout their phantom credentials as foreign policy “experts”. That’s too funny, part two.

But, as I alluded to earlier, I’m not convinced that Biden and his compliant confederates are really that upset by Netanyahu’s plans to kill more people in more places since they share the same geopolitical aim to “destroy” Hezbollah. Towards that impossible end, Israel has assassinated Hassan Nasrallah, the secretary-general of Hezbollah, proving the West’s kill first, think about the consequences later strategy for the combustible region still reigns.

The deaths of more than 41,000 Palestinians and counting – most of them children and women – haven’t prompted Biden and friends to halt arming, defending, and giving Israel diplomatic shade at the United Nations.

Only last week, Germany, the UK, and Canada abstained from a UN motion – sponsored by the State of Palestine – demanding that Israel end its illegal occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The US voted against.

The resolution was based on a ruling by the International Court of Justice in July that said Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territory is unlawful and must end.

The supposed “split” between Israel and its steadfast allies in the West is an exercise in cynical, self-serving posturing. It is a mirage designed to suggest that Western capitals are concerned about the destiny of people they have never been that concerned about.

The truth is just as Western presidents and prime ministers have been content to permit Israel to vent, unrestrained, its “killing rage” and bomb Gaza into dust and memory, they will allow Netanyahu to do the same to Lebanon in due and deliberate course.

Lebanese civilians are as forgettable and disposable as Palestinian civilians. Their lives, their hopes, their dreams don’t matter. All that matters is Israel’s “right to defend itself”.

So, Benjamin Netanyahu will continue to strut as Palestinian and Lebanese innocents continue to die.


Mahkota: The byelection that shouldn’t have been



Murray Hunter


Mahkota: The byelection that shouldn’t have been

Sometimes allowing the opposition to win by walkover can be a strategic victory

Sep 29, 2024





On 29th September 2024, the state seat of Mahkota in Johor had a by-election to replace Sharifah Azzah Syed Zain, who passed away. Shahifah had won the seat for UMNO in the 2022 Johor State election with a hefty 5,166 majority in a four-way contest. With the BN winning 16,611 votes and Pakatan Harapan winning 11,445 votes in Mahkota during the 2022 state election, a victory for Barisan Nasional was almost assured in the by-election. In any other country, the opposing party with virtually no chance of winning it, would have just let UMNO have a walk-over.

However, Perikatan Nasional contested anyway.

The by-election gave a resounding win for Syed Hussein Syed Abdullah of UMNO with 27,995 votes to the Bersatu candidate Mohamad Haizan Jaafar, who garnered only 7,347 votes. That gave BN a massive 20,648 vote majority and bragging rights, that stupidly Bersatu handed UMNO on a silver platter.

Much has been made of the result in the media today.

There have been numerous interpretations of the results. For example, Nicholas Chung, writing in FMT pushed the line that attacks by Perikatan Nasional on UMNO showed PN had no new innovative policies to present the voters of Mahkota.

Bersatu’s Azmin Ali said that PN support remained the same despite the heavy loss and low voter turnout. The 7,347 votes obtained by Bersatu’s Haizan Jaafar was not far off from the 7,614 voted gained by the PN candidate Nor Lingan in the 2022 Johor state election, where the voter turnout was higher at 57.34 percent, compared to 53.84 percent at the byelection yesterday. Che GuBard added to this on a Facebook post, where he said that even when the government controlled all the machinery, BN could only muster 45.6 percent of total voters. That’s 27.941 votes from 67,274 registered voters.

DAP’s Anthony Loke was concerned at the low turnout rates of non-Malays in Mahkota yesterday. Voter turnout among Chinese was only 32 percent, and 34 percent for Indian voters. On the Bersatu side, FMT reports Lau Zhe Wei of the International Islamic University saying “The loss is a primary setback for Bersatu. The majority of seats previously won by PN, were won by PAS”. Former Bersatu Supreme Council member Faiz Na’aman urged founding Bersatu members to join PKR, following the defeat in Mahkota.

Veteran Sabah politician Bung Moktar Radin says that BN and Pakatan Harapan must employ the same formula and cooperate in the coming Sabah State elections. Anwar supporter Imraz Ikhbal says the result shows that UMNO voters now accept the party’s ties with the DAP. Finally, UMNO president and deputy prime minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said BN’s victory reflected the public’s acceptance of the (unity) government. This was reiterated by Amanah president Mohamed Sabu.

Zaid Ibrahim in a post on X said that the weakness of PN is not healthy for a democratic system in Malaysia. The loser is the nation at large.

So much is being surmised above without having enough data available to make sweeping general conclusions about yesterday’s byelection. It wasn’t a real hard ‘one on one’ contest with PAS taking a backseat in a place they are not dominant in. To the contrary, the state government is run by UMNO, and the area is one of UMNO’s bastions of popularity.

Why did so many not even turnout to vote? Perhaps Syed Akbar Ali in his OutSyed blog is absolutely correct. There is absolutely no different between Bersatu/PN or PH/BN.

The ‘mythical green wave’ reached its peak during the 2023 state elections. Now it has only one way to go. Nenggiri and Mahkota are both traditional UMNO territories. PAS south of Perak ‘tak laku’ in the south of the peninsula. So, all these electoral support idiosyncrasies on the peninsula will once again lead to a hung parliament in GE16.





Muhyiddin may be sitting alone very soon.

The odds for PN to win in Mahkota were so low, they should have just not contested it and let UMNO keep the seat by default. It was all just a waste of time and money.

Bersatu, that was only set-up to fight Najib Razak, has a lot to think about. Its electoral weakness is much more public after Mahkota. Bersatu should have not damaged itself.

A passive opposition is not working. PN will have to learn how to behave like an opposition, or are there other plans afoot?


It started with Israel’s invasion: A look at the decades-long conflict with Hezbollah that escalates with Nasrallah’s killing





It started with Israel’s invasion: A look at the decades-long conflict with Hezbollah that escalates with Nasrallah’s killing




Smoke rises from the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted the southern Lebanese border village of Zawtar on September 29, 2024. — AFP pic

Monday, 30 Sep 2024 12:01 PM MYT



NICOSIA, Sept 30 — Israel and Lebanon’s Shiite Muslim movement Hezbollah, whose leader Hassan Nasrallah was killed in an Israeli air strike on a Beirut suburb, have been sworn enemies for decades.

Here is a history of their long conflict:


1982: Israel invades Lebanon; birth of Hezbollah

Hezbollah — the “Party of God” — was born in the wake of Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon in the country’s eastern Bekaa area, and overseen by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps.


In 1985 Hezbollah emerges from the shadows, establishing its armed wing the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon as the spearhead in the fight against Israel.

It carries out suicide car bombings and human wave attacks in the south against Israeli forces and their ally the South Lebanon Army (SLA), a mostly Christian militia.


1992: Nasrallah becomes the group’s leader

In February 1992 an Israeli helicopter gunship attack kills Hezbollah secretary-general Sheikh Abbas al-Musawi.

Aged just 32, Hassan Nasrallah is elected his successor. His baptism of fire comes a year later when Hezbollah, the only group that refused to give up its weapons after Lebanon’s 15-year civil war ended in 1990, battles a large-scale Israeli incursion dubbed “Operation Accountability”.

The stature of the man considered at his death to be the most powerful in Lebanon begins to build.

It is enhanced even further in 1996.


1996: ‘Operation Grapes of Wrath’

On April 11, 1996, Israel launches “Operation Grapes of Wrath”, raids aimed at breaking Hezbollah’s military potential and halting the firing of rockets into northern Israel.

Over 17 days, Israeli forces launch 600 raids and fire 23,000 shells, killing 175 people in Lebanon, mostly civilians. More than 300,000 refugees flee their homes.

International calls for a ceasefire mount after artillery bombards a United Nations camp where fleeing civilians had sought shelter. More than 100 people are killed.

On April 26 an agreement is signed ending the Israeli operation.


2000: Israel withdraws from Lebanon

Israel’s army withdraws in May 2000 after its years-long occupation. The pull-out from its so-called “security” zone is intended to end a situation that had cost it 1,000 men.

Nasrallah will be seen as the architect of this climbdown, after a war of attrition by Hezbollah forces a change of heart among the Israeli population.

This pressure also leads to the Israeli government accepting in 1998 a UN Security Council resolution demanding its immediate withdrawal from south Lebanon.


2006: Israel-Hezbollah war

In 2006 Hezbollah seizes two Israeli soldiers on the Israel-Lebanon border. Hezbollah says it wants to exchange the pair for prisoners held inside Israel, but the outcome is war.

The conflict lasts through July and August and causes 1,200 deaths in Lebanon, mostly civilians, and 160 in Israel, mostly military.

Israel is unable to vanquish Hezbollah, which paints the conflict as a victory.


2023-2024: A new front opens up

When war begins between Israel and Hamas after Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip attack southern Israel on October 7, Iran-backed Hezbollah forces in south Lebanon fire into Israel in support of Hamas.

After nearly a year of cross-border exchanges of fire, Israel on September 23 severely escalates deadly air strikes targeting Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Israel says it is acting to end attacks on it from south Lebanon.

Israel’s military says it has killed most of Hezbollah’s senior leadership. The Hezbollah chief is killed in an air strike on the group’s southern Beirut bastion. — AFP

Israeli attacks kill 105 people in Lebanon as war escalates

 

al Jazeera:


Israeli attacks kill 105 people in Lebanon as war escalates

Israeli military carries out an air raid against an apartment building in the heart of Beirut for first time in years.


air strike lebanon

People stand on the rubble at the site of the Israeli air strike that killed Lebanon's Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut's southern suburbs, September 29 [Ali Alloush/Reuters]

Lebanon has seen another bloody day as relentless Israeli bombardment killed at least 105 people across the country and injured 359 others, according to health officials.

A single attack in Ain al-Delb near the southern Sidon flattened two residential buildings, killing 32 people, Lebanon’s Health Ministry said. Many displaced families sheltering at the site were among the victims.

Several Lebanese politicians described the assault as a “massacre”.

While Israel said it attacked dozens of Hezbollah targets, Lebanese officials said the bombardment struck homes and buildings in southern Lebanon, the Bekaa, Baalbek-Hermel governorate and the southern suburbs of Beirut.

In the early hours of Monday, local media outlets reported an Israeli air strike in the Kola bridge area in the heart of Beirut. The bombing is Israel’s first attack within the city limits since the start of the hostilities last year and will likely be seen as another escalation of the conflict.

The bombing of municipal Beirut suggests that the Lebanese capital, which was previously seen as a safe haven from Israeli attacks, is now in the line of fire as well – like much of the rest of the country.

The assault killed at least three people, Lebanese news outlets reported.

It came two days after Israel assassinated Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah in an enormous series of air raids in the southern suburbs of Beirut that flattened several buildings.

Sunday, September 29, 2024

BERSATU / PERIKATAN NASIONAL WIPED OUT AGAIN, SECOND TIME. TIME FOR SERIOUS RETHINK

 

Sunday, September 29, 2024


BERSATU / PERIKATAN NASIONAL WIPED OUT AGAIN, SECOND TIME. TIME FOR SERIOUS RETHINK


Bersatu has lost the Mahkota by-elections as well. They lost Nenggiri too.

  • UMNO secured  fourfold majority over PN in Mahkota
  • UMNO's Syed Hussien secured 27,941 votes
  • PN Mohamad Haizan garnered 7,347 votes.
  • commanding majority of 20,648 votes
  • crushing defeat for PN, similar to loss in Nenggiri  
  • voter turnout 53.84%
  • Despite lower turnout, BN landslide
  • BN swept all 18 polling districts
  • PN chairman Muhyiddin Yassin must accept blame for wipeout
  • PN leadership reshuffle long overdue 
  • PN lost support from both Malay and non-Malay voters
  • increased votes for UMNO despite lower overall turnout
  • PN should focus on livelihood issues and socioeconomy
  • presenting new solutions compared to PH/BN
  • non-Malay voters want non-racist, moderate policies
  • progressive parties like PH rather than conservative ones like PN
  • Non-Malay votes lost cause for PN
  • PN unpopular among younger voters


My Comments :

With all due respect to Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin he must stand aside and let Hamzah Zainuddin take over the leadership of Bersatu as well as Perikatan Nasional.

And please break with Pas. Pas is of no benefit to Bersatu or PN. Do not be surprised if after this second major loss by the PN, that Pas does a backdoor play with PKR and PH. 

Pas can drop PN and team up with PH at the drop of a kopiah. Dont say I did not warn you. 

But the real problem with Bersatu is that Bersatu is still dancing to the old lagu-lagu zaman black and white TV. 

  • DEAR TAN SRI BAJU, SONGKOK, KOT PUN BLACK AND WHITE JUGA!! 
  • WE NEED NEW COLOURS.


Bersatu has lost both the Malay and non-Malay vote. 

Theresa Kok (DAP) is suing that Pemuda UMNO fellow yet the UMNO candidate won Chinese votes as well in Mahkota. How do you explain that?

There is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE between Bersatu / PN or PH/BN. 

All of you are still selling the same policies that were put in place 50 years ago which ultimately got BN kicked out (2018), Dr Mahathir 2.0 got kicked out (2020), Tan Sri Muhyiddin got replaced (2021) and Ismail Sabri got kicked out 2022. 

Then in 2023 the PH actually lost the SIX State By-elections to PN. Well it looks like those SIX State By elections in 2023 were a watershed. Because since then the PH is performing better than the PN. They won big in Nenggiri and now this landslide in Mahkota.

What is happening is after more time has passed, the people are seeing that Bersatu and PN really are not offering anything new. You are not offering anything new that is different from PH - which is actually the same old failed policies of the past 50 years. 

But Malay sentiment has helped in Johor and of course the Chinese just do not like Pas. Nobody likes Pas. Get rid of them. Let them go and join PH and pull PH down.

Bersatu should not waste time on really useless issues like "we are adamant that vernacular schools be abolished".  What the hell for? Almost 20% of the over 500,000 students at Chinese schools are Malays. That is about 100,000 Malay kids in Chinese schools. That means 200,000 Malay parents or 200,000 Malay voters will be angry if Bersatu wants to abolish Chinese schools. Tak reti kira ke brader? And the number of Malays in Chinese schools is increasing. That is why Bersatu is also losing Malay votes. A lot of Malay voters  send their children to Chinese schools.

The number of Malays in international schools is also increasing. International schools teach in English. So does Bersatu  want to abolish these English language schools too? Or is it only Chinese schools that you dont like? Racist betul.

Why not Bersatu come up with solid plans to revive the sekolah kebangsaan system? Malaysia is dropping like a stone in so many 'international indexes' including education. What is your plan to revitalise the sekolah kebangsaan system.

Now even the MRSM colleges are suffering food poisoning. Kononnya toilet kotor, toilet rosak etc. Recently we heard about that one Chinese school toilet which is comparable to a 5-star hotel.

Why not Bersatu come up with ideas to create 6-star toilets in the sekolah kebangsaan? It is very easy brader. Teach BOTH the cikgu and the students to flush the toilets after they use it. If they can wash their hands that will be a bonus. (How else do you think e coli, bacteria semua masuk dalam makanan?) 

Why not Bersatu stand up and say 'We will abolish all gomen granted monopolies'. Anthony Loke said the Puspakom monopoly will not be renewed. Meaning other entrants will be allowed into vehicle inspection.  That is why they are getting more votes from Malays, Chinese, Indians. Who likes Puspakom's monopoly?

So why dont Bersatu stand up and say 'We will abolish the Bernas' rice import monopoly'. Hello Bersatu, do you honestly think the Malay voters, the Chinese voters, the Indian voters, the Dayak voters and the Kadazan voters all like the Bernas rice monopoly? You must still be stuck in the time zone from before black and white TV. The Twilight Zone. Wake up lah Bersatu.

So why dont Bersatu stand up and say 'We will abolish the APs and insanely high import duties, levies and taxes for motor vehicles. Hello Bersatu, do you honestly think the Malay voters, the Chinese voters, the Indian voters, the Dayak voters and the Kadazan voters all like the APs and the sky high car prices? You must still be stuck in the time zone from before black and white TV. The Twilight Zone. Wake up lah Bersatu.

So why dont Bersatu stand up and say 'We will abolish the Sedition Act and the MCMC Act." Hello Bersatu, do you honestly think the Malay voters, the Chinese voters, the Indian voters, the Dayak voters and the Kadazan voters all like the Sedition Act and the MCMC Act? You must still be stuck in the time zone from before black and white TV. The Twilight Zone. Wake up lah Bersatu.

So there really is nothing for the Malay voters, Chinese voters, Indian voters etc to differentiate Bersatu from PH or UMNO or even Pas. Semua sama juga. 

In 2018 "we" were all fighting Najib. Najib was insanely corrupt. Najib is now in jail. He is history. We succeeded in getting rid of Najib.

But now we must run the country. We have to chart the new direction for the 21st century. This is already 2024 but Bersatu, PKR, UMNO, Pas are still stuck in the 1970s. That was still zaman black and white TV.

"RTM began broadcasting in colour since 28 December 1978 in Peninsular Malaysia and 31 August 1980 in East Malaysia".

So I am not joking when I say that the dasar-dasar kerajaan that are still in place today were first formulated since the 1970s when Malaysia had only black and white TV. And PKR, Bersatu, UMNO, Pas, Amanah all basically agree and still follow these failed policies from the 1970s.

Bersatu really has to offer new thinking to the voters especially the Malay voters. Orang Melayu pun sudah fed up dengan dasar-dasar berkarat dan goblok zaman dinosaur.

No wild horse ideas. 
Dasar kuda liar semua tak boleh. 
We need real, practical and workable ideas for all Malaysians.