Friday, July 01, 2022

Ismail Sabri: An attack against me as PM is an attack on BN


Ismail Sabri: An attack against me as PM is an attack on BN



Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob deliver his speech during the launch of the University Malaya Law Faculty golden jubilee at University Malaya in Kuala Lumpur June 17, 2022. Picture by Yusof Mat Isa


KOTA KINABALU, July 1 — Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob told the public today that he is a prime minister from Barisan Nasional, and therefore an attack against him would also be an attack on the coalition's leadership.

He said that he has been at the receiving end of brickbats from many parties and that he had to fend off speculations on many occasions, even from his own side of the political divide.


"I hope those among us can give their support in facing these attacks. An attack on the government means you are attacking BN’s leadership. And I am in the government representing Umno and the BN.

"I am the PM from BN, not PM from another party. Attacking me means weakening the BN leadership. So I ask for your support here,” he said during his speech at a dinner among the coalition in conjunction with the Sabah BN convention here tomorrow.


Ismail Sabri, who is here on a short half-day trip, said he insisted on speaking at the event tonight to make up for missing tomorrow’s convention because he needs to clarify his position.


"I was not supposed to be speaking tonight, I was given a slot to speak at tomorrow’s convention but I apologise for not being able to attend because I have to attend the MTUC’s annual meeting,” he said, accusing the Malaysian Trades Union Congress of not being traditionally close to BN due to DAP influence.

"I have to explain this here to avoid speculation of all sorts,” he said, drawing an example from when he did not attend the Umno Supreme Council meeting because he had to represent the country in an international meeting being hosted by President Xi Jinping with 17 other head of states and government leaders.

"I had informed the party president, but still all sorts of stories came up, like I was boycotting the party meeting and there were many resolutions made that night. So now everyone has to know what I’m doing otherwise there will be all kinds of speculations,” he said.

He said that he insisted on speaking at tonight’s event, even if only for five minutes to prevent talk that the prime minister is prohibited from speaking at the Sabah BN convention.

"Today, even though PBS is part of the government, they’ve begun to attack us with the belief that the election is nearing. But to face GE15, we must start attacking the opposition, and not one of our own,” he said.

He was referring to Parti Bersatu Sabah president Datuk Seri Maximus Ongkili who had earlier today blamed a BN party for the state’s migrant issues by giving out Malaysian identity cards in exchange for votes.

He stopped short of naming the party but said it was a known fact.

The Bera MP said it was evident that not only outside forces, but allies were trying to create disunity and pressure is getting stronger as talk of the election gets heated.

Ismail Sabri added that any character assassination would only create unnecessary competition within their own ranks when the real challenge was against the opposition.

Umno leaders should stop quarrelling, focus on closing ranks ahead of GE15, says Hishammuddin



Umno leaders should stop quarrelling, focus on closing ranks ahead of GE15, says Hishammuddin




Senior Minister of Defense Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein after the handing over ceremony of the Maritime Operations Helicopter to the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) at the East Fleet Command Headquarters of the RMN Kota Kinabalu Sepanggar Base July 1, 2022. — Bernama pic


KOTA KINABALU, July 1 — The quarreling among Umno leaders should be stopped immediately, as it could lead to a loss of public confidence, says Barisan Nasional (BN) treasurer-general Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein.

Instead, he said everyone in Umno should focus on closing ranks to bring stability ahead of the 15th General Election (GE15).


The Sembrong Division Umno chief said all party leaders who held positions either in the government or the party's Supreme Council should carry out their responsibilities sincerely.

"We will face a general election, the people will determine our position as a government and we (Umno) will also face a party election, and party members will determine the position of the party's top leadership," he said.


The Senior Defence Minister said this during a press conference after officiating the Kota Kinabalu Naval Air Station and the setting up of Squadron 503, besides witnessing the handing over of new maritime operations helicopters at the Royal Malaysian Navy’s (RMN) Base here today.


Meanwhile, Hishammuddin said rifts in the party leadership did not only occur in Umno or BN, as other political parties also faced a similar situation.

However, he was confident that Umno would handle the matter well based on similar situations faced by the party previously, which had seen greater clashes among its leaders.

"But, it (the clashes in the past) did not affect Umno as a party that the people can count on," he said. — Bernama

Tok Pa: Govt to continue consumption subsidies in the short term


Tok Pa: Govt to continue consumption subsidies in the short term



Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Economy) Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed speaks during a dialogue session on current economic issues with the industry and non-governmental organisations in Kota Baru, July 1, 2022. — Bernama pic


KOTA BARU, July 1 — The government will continue the consumption subsidies currently being implemented at least in the short term, according to Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Economy) Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed.

He said the petrol, cooking oil, electricity tariff and other subsidies are being continued to lower the cost of living for the people. As for maintaining these subsidies in the medium to long term, he said it will be assessed in detail to ensure the government’s finances are not adversely affected.


“So far, we have done our best by providing consumption subsidies amounting to RM77.3 billion for 2022. This is the highest subsidy ever borne by the government in history.

“It would be difficult for us to justify (such) a large subsidy over the long term, (but) in the current situation, it has allowed the government to help the people,” he told reporters after attending a dialogue session on current economic issues with the industry and non-governmental organisations here today.


Mustapa, who is also a member of the Special Task Force on Jihad Against Inflation, expressed the intention to empower the consumer bodies in dealing with the rising prices of goods.


“The government will continue to assist the people to handle this problem. National and state-level seminars will be organised to raise consumers’ awareness as we don’t want traders taking advantage of them by increasing prices exorbitantly.

“Our hope is that through communication, the people will have a better understanding of the current situation, and know what the government has done and will do to curb the rise in the prices of goods,” he added. — Bernama


"ANOTHER" vote-buying claim bogs down Ampang PKR polls

theVibes.com:

Another vote-buying claim bogs down Ampang PKR polls

Party member accuses celebrity for ethical misconduct over two-vote win


Muhammad Syafiq Zulkifli has attached photos of a person wearing Datuk Hans Isaac’s (pic) campaign wristband holding two pieces of RM50. – Screen grab pic, July 1, 2022


KUALA LUMPUR – Could Ampang PKR potentially be headed for another re-election?


An allegation of vote-buying in the division has surfaced yet again, this time against Datuk Hans Isaac.

The claim comes a day after the unofficial result of the re-election for the division chief post. Final counts showed that the celebrity-cum-politician came out victorious by bare margins.

The Vibes has contacted Hans and PKR election committee chairman Dr Zaliha Mustafa for comments and is awaiting their respective responses.

In an official complaint lodged to the committee, PKR member, Muhammad Syafiq Zulkifli, has alleged ethical misconduct involving Hans.

According to the document sighted by The Vibes, Syafiq claims the Ampang division chief candidate and those in his team were supposedly involved in money politics in a bid to secure votes during the re-election on Wednesday.

He said he identified the perpetrators as being from Hans’ team via wristbands worn by the supposed malefactors which depicted the latter’s campaign motto “Ayuh Ampang Baru”.

Syafiq also attached a couple of images portraying a person wearing the wristband holding two RM50 notes, although no elements of vote-buying were shown in the pictures.

He also claimed to have video evidence of the supposed act, and that this would be furnished to the PKR election committee upon request via WhatsApp.

When contacted for verification, Syafiq confirmed that the letter was submitted this morning.

Unofficial results released yesterday showed that Hans managed to clinch victory in the race for the Ampang division chief post after edging his closest competitor Syed Ahmad Abdul Rahman, or Altimet, by a meagre two votes in the re-election.

The former garnered 748 votes to Altimet’s 746, although official results are yet to be released, with a number of dubious votes yet to be accounted for.

Altimet has submitted a request for a recount to be conducted.

The re-election was held after the PKR election committee decided to revoke Daing Muhammad Reduan Bachok’s victory last month and disqualified him from contesting after he was found engaging in vote-buying during campaigning. – The Vibes, July 1, 2022

*********

kt comments:

Maybe PKR has been cursed by the ghosts of 40,000 Bangladeshis whom their party stalwarts used to blame in earlier elections (prior to 2018), wakakaka.


Related:

Bangla in Pilihanraya


Ukraine Is the Latest Neocon Disaster



Volume 27, Number 179–- Friday, July 1, 2022


Ukraine Is the Latest Neocon Disaster

If Europe has any insight, it will separate itself from these U.S. foreign policy debacles, writes Jeffrey D. Sachs.



President Joe Biden delivering “stand with Ukraine” remarks on May 3 at the Lockheed Martin facility in Troy, Alabama. (White House, Adam Schultz)


By Jeffrey D. Sachs
Common Dreams



The war in Ukraine is the culmination of a 30-year project of the American neoconservative movement. The Biden administration is packed with the same neocons who championed the U.S. wars of choice in Serbia (1999), Afghanistan (2001), Iraq (2003), Syria (2011), Libya (2011), and who did so much to provoke Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The neocon track record is one of unmitigated disaster, yet Biden has staffed his team with neocons. As a result, Biden is steering Ukraine, the U.S. and the European Union towards yet another geopolitical debacle. If Europe has any insight, it will separate itself from these U.S. foreign policy debacles.

The neocon movement emerged in the 1970s around a group of public intellectuals, several of whom were influenced by University of Chicago political scientist Leo Strauss and Yale University classicist Donald Kagan. Neocon leaders included Norman Podhoretz, Irving Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Robert Kagan (son of Donald), Frederick Kagan (son of Donald), Victoria Nuland (wife of Robert), Elliott Cohen, Elliott Abrams and Kimberley Allen Kagan (wife of Frederick).

The main message of the neocons is that the U.S. must predominate in military power in every region of the world and must confront rising regional powers that could someday challenge U.S. global or regional dominance, most important Russia and China. For this purpose, U.S. military force should be pre-positioned in hundreds of military bases around the world and the U.S. should be prepared to lead wars of choice as necessary. The United Nations is to be used by the U.S. only when useful for U.S. purposes.

Wolfowitz Spelled It Out

This approach was spelled out first by Paul Wolfowitz in his draft Defense Policy Guidance (DPG) written for the Department of Defense in 2002. The draft called for extending the U.S.-led security network to Central and Eastern Europe despite the explicit promise by German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher in 1990 that German unification would not be followed by NATO’s eastward enlargement.

[Related: The New York Times’ Shift on Victory in Ukraine]

Wolfowitz also made the case for American wars of choice, defending America’s right to act independently, even alone, in response to crises of concern to the U.S. According to General Wesley Clark, Wolfowitz already made clear to Clark in May 1991 that the U.S. would lead regime-change operations in Iraq, Syria and other former Soviet allies.



Oct. 2, 1991: Paul Wolfowitz, on right, as under secretary of defense for policy, during press conference on Operation Desert Storm. Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf in center, Gen. Colin Powell on left. (Lietmotiv via Flickr)



The neocons championed NATO enlargement to Ukraine even before that became official U.S. policy under President George W. Bush, Jr. in 2008. They viewed Ukraine’s NATO membership as key to U.S. regional and global dominance. Robert Kagan spelled out the neocon case for NATO enlargement in April 2006:


“[T]he Russians and Chinese see nothing natural in [the ‘color revolutions’ of the former Soviet Union], only Western-backed coups designed to advance Western influence in strategically vital parts of the world. Are they so wrong? Might not the successful liberalization of Ukraine, urged and supported by the Western democracies, be but the prelude to the incorporation of that nation into NATO and the European Union — in short, the expansion of Western liberal hegemony?”

Kagan acknowledged the dire implication of NATO enlargement. He quotes one expert as saying, “the Kremlin is getting ready for the ‘battle for Ukraine’ in all seriousness.”

The neocons sought this battle. After the fall of the Soviet Union, both the U.S. and Russia should have sought a neutral Ukraine, as a prudent buffer and safety valve. Instead, the neocons wanted U.S. “hegemony” while the Russians took up the battle partly in defense and partly out of their own imperial pretensions as well. Shades of the Crimean War (1853-6), when Britain and France sought to weaken Russia in the Black Sea following Russian pressures on the Ottoman empire.

Kagan penned the article as a private citizen while his wife Victoria Nuland was the U.S. ambassador to NATO under George W. Bush, Jr.

Nuland has been the neocon operative par excellence. In addition to serving as Bush’s ambassador to NATO, Nuland was President Barack Obama’s assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs during 2013-17, when she participated in the overthrow of Ukraine’s pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and now serves as Biden’s undersecretary of state guiding U.S. policy vis-à-vis the war in Ukraine.

The neocon outlook is based on an overriding false premise: that the U.S. military, financial, technological, and economic superiority enables it to dictate terms in all regions of the world. It is a position of both remarkable hubris and remarkable disdain of evidence.



May 16, 2015: Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland at the police patrol training site in Kiev, Ukraine. (U.S. Embassy Kyiv)


Since the 1950s, the U.S. has been stymied or defeated in nearly every regional conflict in which it has participated. Yet in the “battle for Ukraine,” the neocons were ready to provoke a military confrontation with Russia by expanding NATO over Russia’s vehement objections because they fervently believe that Russia will be defeated by U.S. financial sanctions and NATO weaponry.

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a neocon think-tank led by Kimberley Allen Kagan (and backed by a who’s who of defense contractors such as General Dynamics and Raytheon), continues to promise a Ukrainian victory.


Regarding Russia’s advances, the ISW offered a typical comment:

“[R]egardless of which side holds the city [of Sievierodonetsk], the Russian offensive at the operational and strategic levels will probably have culminated, giving Ukraine the chance to restart its operational-level counteroffensives to push Russian forces back.”

The facts on the ground, however, suggest otherwise. The West’s economic sanctions have had little adverse impact on Russia, while their “boomerang” effect on the rest of the world has been large.

Moreover, the U.S. capacity to resupply Ukraine with ammunition and weaponry is seriously hamstrung by America’s limited production capacity and broken supply chains. Russia’s industrial capacity of course dwarfs that of Ukraine’s. Russia’s GDP was roughly 10X that of Ukraine before the war and Ukraine has now lost much of its industrial capacity in the war.

The most likely outcome of the current fighting is that Russia will conquer a large swath of Ukraine, perhaps leaving Ukraine landlocked or nearly so. Frustration will rise in Europe and the U.S. with the military losses and the stagflationary consequences of war and sanctions.

The knock-on effects could be devastating, if a right-wing demagogue in the U.S. rises to power (or in the case of Trump, returns to power) promising to restore America’s faded military glory through dangerous escalation.

Instead of risking this disaster, the real solution is to end the neocon fantasies of the past 30 years and for Ukraine and Russia to return to the negotiating table, with NATO committing to end its commitment to the eastward enlargement to Ukraine and Georgia in return for a viable peace that respects and protects Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.


Jeffrey D. Sachs is a university professor and director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University, where he directed The Earth Institute from 2002 until 2016. He is also president of the U.N. Sustainable Development Solutions Network and a commissioner of the U.N. Broadband Commission for Development. He has been adviser to three United Nations secretaries-general and currently serves as an SDG advocate under Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Sachs is the author, most recently, of A New Foreign Policy: Beyond American Exceptionalism (2020). Other books include: Building the New American Economy: Smart, Fair, and Sustainable (2017) and The Age of Sustainable Development, (2015) with Ban Ki-moon.

This article is from Common Dreams.


Weak Bersatu now riding on GRS’ name, says Najib



Weak Bersatu now riding on GRS’ name, says Najib


Former prime minister Najib Razak receiving a souvenir while at a meeting with his social media supporters in Kota Kinabalu today. (Facebook pic)


KOTA KINABALU: Barisan Nasional adviser Najib Razak says Bersatu’s leaders in Sabah are now riding on the Gabungan Rakyat Sabah brand as the party itself is starting to weaken.

Najib said the party’s Sabah leaders were no longer touting the Bersatu name as they did before. He said PAS was similarly seeking to contest the next general election under its own banner, rather than that of Perikatan Nasional.


“Individually, I see that the party’s strength is dwindling, and the same goes for Warisan,” he told reporters here.

GRS currently comprises Sabah Bersatu, Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS), the Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP), Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku (STAR) and the United Sabah National Organisation.


GRS and Barisan Nasional are partners in the Sabah state government.

Najib said the political situation in Sabah would depend on how things turned out in the peninsula at the general election.

He said BN seemed to have the edge in West Malaysia currently, but believed the same would happen in Sabah. “In the context of Sabah, we have to show that BN is not just a peninsula-based party,” he said.


Fact check: Did Dr M ask Zahid to dissolve Umno?





Fact check: Did Dr M ask Zahid to dissolve Umno?


FACT CHECK | On June 28, Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi testified in court that he was asked by former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad to dissolve Umno when the two met in June 2018 - a month after Pakatan Harapan won power.

Zahid told the court this during the defence stage of his trial for criminal breach of trust, money laundering and corruption.

The former deputy prime minister was making a case that the charges against him were politically motivated.

Following this, Mahathir suggested Zahid should prove his ‘dissolve Umno’ claims.

This instalment of Fact Check will look at some of the statements made by the duo back in 2018 concerning Umno and if Mahathir had asked Zahid to dissolve the oldest Malay party.



The short answer: Mahathir did publicly admit to asking Zahid to dissolve Umno and persuading Umno members to join Bersatu.

Zahid, as acting Umno president, visited Mahathir - the prime minister at the time - at the Perdana Leadership Foundation headquarters in Putrajaya on June 7, 2018. Later that month, he was elected president of Umno.

By Oct 20, 2018, Zahid was charged with criminal breach of trust, corruption and money laundering in relation to Yayasan Akal Budi.

A week later, he attended the MIC annual general meeting where he revealed that Mahathir had asked him to dissolve Umno.

Dr M: Umno lost original cause

Mahathir responded to this revelation on Nov 9, 2018, in a video uploaded on Bersatu's Facebook.

"I asked him to dissolve (Umno) because there is no more Umno. In practice, there is no more Umno, only a legal entity. Its original cause is gone.

"Why would Umno members need a party that has left its roots and prioritises money? Cash is king. Therefore, Umno, in its present form, should be dissolved," he said.

After criminal charges were laid against Zahid, several Umno MPs defected, putting further doubts on his legitimacy to lead the party.

As pressure mounted, Zahid went on leave as Umno president on Dec 19, 2018, handing over the reins to his deputy Mohamad Hasan. Zahid returned on June 30, 2019.


Muhyiddin Yassin


In recent months, Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin has been claiming that Zahid visited him with "stacks of files" when the former was a prime minister, suggesting that the Bagan Datuk MP wanted executive interference in the trial.

Zahid denied the claims and filed a defamation suit against Muhyiddin over it.


The woman whose loose tongue has set her country on fire



India’s top court slams spokeswoman who sparked Prophet row


Indian Muslims hold placards during a protest in Ahmedabad last month. (AP pic)


NEW DELHI: A ruling party spokeswoman whose remarks on Islam embroiled India in a diplomatic row and sparked huge protests should apologise for having “set the country on fire,” New Delhi’s top court said today.

Anger engulfed the Islamic world last month after Nupur Sharma’s incendiary comments during a TV debate on the relationship between the Prophet Mohammed and his youngest wife, with nearly 20 countries calling in their Indian ambassadors for an explanation.


Rallies also erupted around South Asia, with police killing two demonstrators in India, while this week two Muslim men were accused of the grisly murder of a Hindu tailor who had posted in support of Sharma on Facebook.

“She and her loose tongue have set the country on fire,” India’s Supreme Court said during a procedural hearing on several criminal complaints filed against Sharma.

“This lady is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country,” it added. “She should apologise to the whole nation.”

Since her comments, Sharma has been subjected to multiple police complaints filed against her across India by members of the public.

While the 37-year-old’s whereabouts are unknown, her lawyer was in court asking that the cases be consolidated in New Delhi, a request denied today.

Sharma was at one time seen as a rising star in the governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) but her remarks forced it into damage control.


The party soon suspended the spokeswoman from her post and issued a statement insisting it respected all religions.

Since coming to power nationally in 2014, the BJP under Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been accused of championing discriminatory policies towards followers of the Islamic faith.

Critics also say the government has presided over a crackdown on free speech and rights activists.

This week police arrested the Muslim journalist Mohammed Zubair, a vocal critic of the government who had helped draw attention to Sharma’s remarks.

He was arrested on Monday and remains in custody over a four-year-old tweet about a Hindu god that police said had been the subject of complaints by Hindu groups.


Legal scholar who advised Malay Rulers against Rome Statute appointed Suhakam chair, ex-Jakim DG among new commissioners



Legal scholar who advised Malay Rulers against Rome Statute appointed Suhakam chair, ex-Jakim DG and former Bar, MMA presidents among new commissioners



Suhakam logo is pictured at its headquarters in Kuala Lumpur November 25, 2019. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa


KUALA LUMPUR, July 1 — Former Universiti Teknologi Mara’s (UiTM) deputy vice-chancellor and Faculty of Law dean Prof Datuk Rahmat Mohamad was today appointed as the new chairman of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam).

In a statement today, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob announced his appointment including seven more commissioners for the term between 2022 and 2025 effective June 22, after receiving the consent of Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah.


"It is hoped that these inclusive appointments will further empower Suhakam in carrying out its activities for the wellbeing of the country,” the prime minister said.

Rahmat is currently the National Sports Institute of Malaysia chairman, and had formerly served in the Asian-African Legal Consultative Organisation and the International Union for Conservation of Nature.


The others appointed were Prof Datuk Noor Aziah Mohd Awal, Datuk Mohamad Nordin Ibrahim, Dr Chew Chee Ming, Datuk Mary @ Mariati Robert, Datuk Hasnal Rezua Merican Habib Merican, Nazira Abdul Rahim and K. Ragunath.


Nordin was formerly the director-general of the Islamic Development Department of Malaysia (Jakim) between 2018 and 2019.

Ragunath is the former Malaysian Bar president, and Hasnal and Nazira are both law practitioners.

Dr Chew was the former president of the Malaysian Medical Association, and Mary was formerly a deputy public prosecutor — from Sarawak and Sabah respectively.

Noor Aziah has been serving Suhakam since 2019 as the Child Commissioner.

Rahmat was among those who had explained the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court to the Conference of Rulers in April 2019, besides former attorney-general Tan Sri Tommy Thomas, Foreign Minister Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah, and then chief of the Armed Forces General Tan Sri Zulkifli Zainal Abidin.

Putrajaya later informed the United Nations of its decision to withdraw from the ratifying it later that month, with the then prime minister saying the decision was made due to a lot of confusion on what the statute entails caused by people with vested political interests.

Rahmat was one of the four academics who were said to have prepared a paper for the Malay rulers, with the executive summary of the paper later leaked by nine student activists.

The other three academics who drafted the paper are International Islamic University of Malaysia’s law lecturer Assoc Prof Shamrahayu Ab Aziz, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia’s law lecturers Fareed Mohd Hassan and Hisham Hanapi.

In the document, they warned among other things that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court as he is the supreme commander of the country’s armed forces.



Annuar rubbishes claim ministers pushing for GE15 by Oct

theVibes.com:

Annuar rubbishes claim ministers pushing for GE15 by Oct

Comms minister insists news fake, says cabinet never discussed election in recent meetings


Tan Sri Annuar Musa, after launching the logo and theme for this year’s National Day and Malaysia Day, says the prime minister and the ministers meet every week to discuss national issues, but never over the coming general election. – SYEDA IMRAN/The Vibes pic, July 1, 2022


KUALA LUMPUR – Tan Sri Annuar Musa has rubbished a report claiming cabinet members advised Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob to hold the general election latest by October, when inflation will supposedly peak.


Describing it as fake news, the communications and multimedia minister also dismissed any suggestion that the cabinet discussed the election in its recent meetings.

“Fake! As the minister in charge of communications, I can answer briefly that the news is fake,” he told a press conference after launching the logo and theme for this year’s National Day and Malaysia Day here today.

“The prime minister meets the ministers every week to discuss national issues, but never over the election.”

He was asked to comment on a media report claiming that Ismail Sabri met with ministers recently to get their views on when best to hold national polls.

In an op-ed by Sin Chew Daily, it claimed that most ministers and deputies felt that the general election must be held latest by October, as the effect of global inflation would be fully felt by the end of the year.

The report mentioned that Annuar and Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim were among the cabinet members who disagreed with the suggestion.

Responding to the questions from the media, Annuar expressed bemusement that anyone can predict when inflation would peak.

“Come and see me, we’ll discuss, because I would love to learn from him. If he can identify which month inflation will peak just like moon sightings during Hari Raya, I want to learn from him.”

Ismail Sabri has been under pressure from his party leadership to move the election date forward to take advantage of a weakened opposition.

However, the prime minister had previously said that now is not a good time to conduct the polls amid spiralling cost of living and inflation.

There have been speculations that the cabinet meeting on Wednesday had discussed the general election. – The Vibes, July 1, 2022


Guan Eng awarded RM150,000 in suit against 2 Chinese dailies



Guan Eng awarded RM150,000 in suit against 2 Chinese dailies


Lim Guan Eng said the published remarks made him look like he had abused his power as then finance minister and ‘misused’ the Inland Revenue Board.


GEORGE TOWN: The High Court here has ordered two Chinese dailies to pay former finance minister Lim Guan Eng RM150,000 in damages over defamatory articles published three years ago.

The articles published by China Press and Guang Ming Daily involved remarks by a businessman who was slapped with an order to pay RM2.4 million in tax arrears to the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN).


In the articles published in 2019, the businessman insinuated that the taxman was after him after being instigated by Lim.

In delivering the verdict in favour of Lim, judge Tun Majid Tun Hamzah said the dailies did not seek Lim’s side of the story before publishing the reports.


He ordered the publishers – Guang Ming Ribao Sdn Bhd and The China Press Berhad – to pay a total of RM120,000 in damages and RM30,000 in costs.

The articles were published on China Press’ online news portal on May 13, 2019, and Guang Ming Daily published it in its print edition the next day.

They were based on a press conference held by businessman Chang Wei Lu, a former leader of a Chinese clan council and business chamber in Penang.

Based on court documents, Chang had said his RM500,000 donation to the Tunku Abdul Rahman University College had “inadvertently” upset Lim, who had refused to fund the institution.

At the same time, he said, he was slapped with a RM2.4 million bill by LHDN and was barred from leaving the country.


Lim contended that the published remarks made him look like he had abused his power as the finance minister and “misused” LHDN to go against Chang.

He said the statements had “gravely injured” his character, reputation and good name, adding that China Press and Guang Ming Daily were supposed to uphold responsible journalism.

Both publications had told the court they had sought Lim’s comment after the articles were published, but he refused to comment.

K Simon Murali appeared for Lim, while Yiew Voon Lee appeared for China Press and Guang Ming Daily.


Najib’s Federal Court motion raises key questions about recusal of judges



Najib’s Federal Court motion raises key questions about recusal of judges


Najib Razak wants the Federal Court to admit fresh evidence to show that Court of Appeal judge Nazlan Ghazali had ‘personal involvement’ in setting up SRC and was present at meetings to discuss a loan for 1MDB.


PETALING JAYA: A key question unfolding within former prime minister Najib Razak’s appeal to the Federal Court from his criminal conviction in the SRC International case is whether High Court judge Nazlan Ghazali ought to have disqualified himself from presiding over the trial due to an alleged conflict of interests.

By a motion filed on June 7, Najib is asking the Federal Court to admit fresh evidence, which he claims was not available previously, to show Nazlan, Maybank’s general counsel and company secretary between 2006 and 2015, had “personal involvement” in setting up SRC and was present at meetings which deliberated an RM4.17bil loan for 1MDB to acquire Tanjong Energy.


Such “involvement” made Nazlan a potential witness in the former prime minister’s 1MDB criminal trial – presently on-going in another High Court – and gave rise to a conflict of interests, Najib claims. He says Nazlan should have recused himself from presiding over the SRC trial on that basis.

In his affidavit-in-reply, deputy public prosecutor Ashrof Adrin Kamarul claims that Nazlan’s previous position in Maybank had no relevance to the SRC trial.

Ashrof says that the judge’s purported knowledge of Maybank’s loan to 1MDB was unrelated to the issues in the SRC case and did not bar Nazlan from presiding.

The prosecutor also contends that Nazlan’s employment with Maybank was public knowledge and was always known to Najib who never raised any objection. In any case, Ashrof says, the documents which Najib seeks to admit were already available to him while the trial was on-going.

Apart from the usual rules which govern the admission of fresh evidence and an assessment of whether Nazlan was indeed sufficiently “involved” to be a potential witness as claimed, the case raises several important questions surrounding the recusal of judges which the Federal Court may have to look at.

One key question is how proximate the relationship between an arbiter and the factual scenario or the parties in the dispute must be before a potential conflict of interests situation is triggered.

The 1MDB saga has had more than its fair share of recusals and requests for judges to step aside. Questions remain whether some were legally justified or not.


The judges and judicial commissioners who have recused themselves from 1MDB-linked cases are (clockwise from top left) Sofian Razak, Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh, Liza Chan, Adlin Majid, Arief Emran Arifin and Quay Chew Soon.


In July 2018, the Malaysian Bar objected to High Court judge Sofian Razak hearing Najib’s SRC criminal case as his brother was an Umno state assemblyman in Pahang.

Last month, judge Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh also recused himself from hearing an application for Queen’s Counsel Jonathan Laidlaw to represent Najib in the Federal Court as his brother is an Umno member.

In June 2021, judicial commissioner Liza Chan recused herself from a civil suit taken out by 1MDB against Najib based on her friendship with him despite them not having been in contact for several years.

kt comments: Like Caesar's wife judicial commissioner Liza Chan strived to be above reproach, a most commendable effort, and which should be a standard EVERY other judges should have equally strived for

JCs Adlin Majid and Arief Emran Arifin also recused themselves as the law firms where they had practised before their appointment had acted for 1MDB and SRC even though they themselves were not involved.

Another JC, Quay Chew Soon, voluntarily notified parties in a 1MDB-related civil suit of a potential conflict for the same reason.

Other related questions may also need consideration, including when and in what circumstances will disclosure become obligatory; when, how and to whom must it be made; and how much disclosure is necessary.

Presently, judges are left to navigate such matters on their own, guided no doubt by long established principles of natural justice, but invariably interpreted according to their own conscience. The result is a lack of uniformity, and in some cases, incoherence.

Perhaps, the longer-term solution may be to draw up a code of conduct to govern the subject.


Najib denies backing Anwar to have court cases dropped



Najib denies backing Anwar to have court cases dropped


Najib Razak (left) has described Anwar Ibrahim’s allegations as ‘absolutely untrue’.


PETALING JAYA: Najib Razak has denied Anwar Ibrahim’s claim that he signed a statutory declaration (SD) backing the PKR president as prime minister in return for an assurance that his court cases would be dropped.

“What Anwar says is absolutely untrue,” Najib said in a Facebook post, adding he never asked anyone for help to drop his cases.


Najib also questioned the opposition leader’s claim of having the support of 120 MPs.

“Then why did Istana Negara not appoint him as prime minister?

“And why did he not prove this support through votes in Parliament, including by way of thwarting the 2021 budget vote at the time?” he said.

Yesterday, Anwar claimed he rejected two SDs backing him as prime minister because he did not want to interfere with the judiciary.

He said the two SDs were signed by Najib and Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, adding that after the declarations in support of him were signed, he was asked to give an assurance that Najib’s court cases would be discontinued.

*********

kt comments:

I personally doubt Anwar would have refused anyone's support to become PM - that has been his lifelong wish and thus, his non-achievement becoming his consequential heart-breaking frustration



Singaporean man emailed photos of his genitals to female police officer, jailed nine weeks



Singaporean man emailed photos of his genitals to female police officer, jailed nine weeks




Yesterday (June 30), the 58-year-old Singaporean pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual exposure. He was jailed for nine weeks. ― TODAY pic


SINGAPORE, July 1 — Frustrated that an investigation officer had allegedly not attended to his case several years ago, Lau Kian Tiong emailed the female officer photographs of his penis along with an obscene suggestion.


Yesterday (June 30), the 58-year-old Singaporean pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual exposure. He was jailed for nine weeks.

Another charge of transmitting obscene material was taken into consideration for sentencing.


His victim, aged 36, cannot be named due to a court order to protect her identity.


Lau claimed that in 2018, he had gone to Central Police Division headquarters on the officer’s instructions since she had sent him letters asking him to report for an interview there for an alleged offence.

She was assigned to investigate his case of voluntarily causing hurt, the court heard.

He claimed that when he was there, she did not attend to him. This caused him to feel annoyed.

On May 25 last year, he then sent two photos of his private parts to her official Singapore Police Force email address in order to humiliate her, the court heard.

His two emails were titled: “Hi, good morning, my dear wife. Please help me oral sex because my penis is really itchy. Thank you so much.” Court documents did not reveal why he decided to do this three years later.

A short while later on June 4 last year, police officers at Orchard Neighbourhood Police Centre spotted him loitering and taking photos outside the police station.

They screened him and realised that a police gazette had been issued for his arrest under the voluntarily causing hurt offence.

They then contacted the female officer handling his case, who directed Lau to report for another interview three days later for the case.

At the same time, on checking Lau’s mobile phone, the officers discovered the two photos of his genitals that he had sent to the female officer. He then confessed to emailing her these photos.

The victim was later alerted to this.

Yesterday, the prosecution sought eight to 10 weeks’ jail.

In mitigation, Lau — who did not have a lawyer — told District Judge John Ng in Mandarin through an interpreter: “Sir, because I did it out of a fit of anger, I hope for a lighter sentence. I’m already in regret and frustration over this.” His sentence was backdated to May 25 this year.

He was previously fined S$400 (RM1,267) for wrongful restraint in 1988, as well as fined S$5,000 in 1994 for committing mischief that caused damages of S$500 or above.

For each offence of sexual exposure, he could have been jailed for up to a year or fined, or punished with both. ― TODAY

Indonesia to cease sending domestic helpers to M’sia due to mistreatment, unpaid wages

theVibes.com:

Indonesia to cease sending domestic helpers to M’sia due to mistreatment, unpaid wages

Country yet to decide on deadline, says ambassador


Indonesian Ambassador to Malaysia, Hermono, says documents of only 10 people have been fully processed to allow them to work as helpers in Malaysia. – MTUC pic, July 1, 2022


KUALA LUMPUR – Indonesia is no longer keen on sending its citizens to work as domestic helpers in Malaysia due to bad treatment and unpaid wages.


Indonesian Ambassador to Malaysia Hermono said documents of only 10 people have been fully processed to allow them to work as helpers in Malaysia.

He added that Indonesia is moving away from supplying domestic workers to Malaysia and the Middle East, but yet to decide on a deadline, reported The Star.

He was reported as saying that common issues faced by Indonesian helpers in Malaysia are mistreatment and unpaid wages.

The arrival of the first batch of domestic workers will only be in mid-July and delayed due to their training, he added.

On May 31, it was reported that the arrival of Indonesian domestic workers was delayed even though there was overwhelming demand.

However, the two countries had signed on April 1, a memorandum of understanding on the Employment and Protection of Indonesian Domestic Workers in Malaysia.

Under the agreement, workers are entitled to weekly and annual leave, right to communicate and able to lodge complaints via an online system.

It was also agreed that employers or agencies would no longer be able to withhold passports and allows one maid per household with not more than six people. – The Vibes, July 1, 2022


From 'heavenly kings' to football team - plight of Perak farmers





From 'heavenly kings' to football team - plight of Perak farmers


As Malaysians grapple with a food crisis, 12 farming communities in Perak are facing eviction and staring at a bleak future.

There is some consolation in the form of PSM, whose lawyers are assisting more than 300 vegetable farmers from Chemor, Bidor and Kampar through legal actions and petitions.

According to documents sighted by Malaysiakini, those with land grants who are driving the farmers out are mostly developers seeking to build residential areas on these lands.

This is despite the “2021 Malaysia Annual Property Market Report” revealing that Perak is the sixth among states with the highest number of unsold properties. In total, 2,748 units remain unsold.

Meanwhile, PSM pointed to the “dubious backgrounds” of some landowners. It also claimed that the state government is selling land at bargain-basement prices.


Farmlands give way to housing projects


Case 1: From prawn farming to residential houses

In 2019, eight farmers from Sungai Pari, Chemor received letters from Bukit Aneka Sdn Bhd demanding them to vacate the 22.7ha land within a month.

Lawyers later discovered that the Perak Department of Lands and Mines granted a temporary occupation licence (TOL) to Bukit Aneka in 1993.


According to PSM chairperson Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj, the property investment firm initially applied to farm freshwater prawns but switched to constructing affordable houses in 2014.

Later, Bukit Aneka altered the land purpose again, this time to build general residential housing.

Bukit Aneka is solely owned by LTS Properties Sdn Bhd, which was founded and owned by tycoon Law Tien Seng. He is also the honorary adviser of the Federation of Chinese Associations of Malaysia (Hua Zong).

The farmers are currently locked in a legal dispute. The matter is pending over their bid to include Perak Department of Lands and Mines in the case to explain prioritising Bukit Aneka over farmers.

Case 2: ‘Heavenly king’ awarded 41.7ha of farming land

According to an affidavit sighted by Malaysiakini, the Perak state government awarded 41.7ha (103 acres) in Pusing to Tee Yam Holdings Sdn Bhd on Aug 25, 2017.

The company is owned by Koo Tee Yam, a controversial businessperson who is listed as one of Kuala Lumpur’s “four heavenly kings" underworld figures.

Four months later, on Dec 15, 2017, Tee Yam sold the land to two businesspersons, who paid a down payment of RM2.5 million.

Based on the typical 10 percent down payment practice, Jeyakumar said the land was sold for RM25 million or in other words, RM250,000 per acre.

“What has Tee Yam contributed to the people of Perak (to be given the land)?” asked the former Sungai Siput MP.


PSM chairperson Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj


PSM reported this issue to MACC and its chief commissioner Azam Baki last year.

The farmers are pursuing the case in court. The outcome would determine the fate of 19 families.

Case 3: Farming land awarded to football team as gift

In May 2019, the Perak football team defeated Terengganu to win the Malaysia Cup.

As a reward, then menteri besar Ahmad Faizal Azumu awarded land to them to build houses.

The land earmarked for this purpose was 9.7ha in Tanah Hitam, where 11 farmers are cultivating vegetables.

Following the menteri besar’s announcement, the farmers received letters from the government instructing them to vacate the land in two weeks.

The farmers have since appointed a lawyer to initiate legal proceedings against the state government and Perak Department of Lands and Mines.

Case 4: Companies owned by ex-MCA Youth leader

During the 80s, the Perak state government initiated a “Vegetable Farming Project” (Projek Persayuran) in the Ulu Kinta area. Farmers from Belakang Chemor successfully applied to rent farming lands under the project, but their dreams have now come to an end.

Last March, 20 farmers received letters from two companies - Kinding Maju Sdn Bhd and Infinite Acres Sdn Bhd - stating that they owned the 32ha of land. The farmers were told to vacate within three months to pave the way for the construction of houses.



The two real estate companies have common shareholders - Liew Yin Yin Land Sdn Bhd and Liew Mun Hon.

Mun Hon is the former Ipoh Timur MCA Youth chief. In the 2008 general election, he lost to DAP’s Lim Kit Siang in the Ipoh Timur seat. Mun Hon is the chairperson of Liew Yin Yin Group Berhad - the parent company of Liew Yin Yin Land Sdn Bhd.

The group is working with the Perak government to build affordable houses in Kinta, Bidor and Sungkai.

Case 5: Farming land sold at 65pct discount?

According to Perak Department of Lands and Mines’s records, the ownership of 19.4ha (48 acres) of land near Taman Chepor Sentosa was transferred from the Perak State Development Corporation (PKNP) to KM Majubina Sdn Bhd.

The eight farmers who were working on the land challenged the land transfer in court.

During the proceedings, KM Majubina presented a deed of assignment to the court, which revealed the firm paid RM4.82 million to PKNP.

A check on iProperty revealed that one acre in the area is valued at RM290,000, which means that the market rate for 48 acres should be around RM13.92 million.

Therefore, Jeyakumar said the state government incurred a huge loss by selling the land at around RM100,000 per acre to KM Majubina.

He questioned the motive behind the 65 percent or RM9.1 million discount.

Malaysiakini has reached out to Perak Menteri Besar Saarani Mohamad's office and the abovementioned developers for their responses.


Perak Menteri Besar Saarani Mohamad


Farmers being evicted by housing developers

Besides the five cases mentioned above, another seven groups of farmers are also facing eviction in Perak.

1. Perak State Development Corporation (PKNP), which is owned by the state government, plans to build the Silver Valley Technology Park, which will reclaim a total of 422.9ha of farming land in Kanthan, Chemor. Under this project, 132 farmers will be evicted.

READ MORE: Amid food crisis, an 'invisible fortune' is being robbed

2. Some 20ha of farming land near Taman Chepor Impian, Chemor was partly cleared by a property investment company - Ain Bina Sdn Bhd. The firm claimed to be the actual landowner. Eight farmers and activists tried to stop the eviction but were arrested. Ain Bina plans to build a residential area.

3. Thirty-six farmers from Changkat Kinding, Chemor discovered that their farming land had been transferred to Generasi Simbolik Sdn Bhd when they received notices to vacate in May. Generasi Simbolik, a subsidiary of LBS Bina Holdings, plans to build a housing project on the 101ha.

READ MORE: Farmers urge the developer to postpone a project, lease land instead

4. In Kuala Kampar, the Perak Agriculture State Development Corporation (PPPNP) sold farming land cultivated by 10 farmers to Suria Fishery Sdn Bhd.

5. In Tanah Hitam, Chemor, the state government sold 6.5ha to housing developer Saujana Amanjaya Properties Sdn Bhd. Sixteen farmers have been ordered to vacate the land.

6. In Mambang Diawan, Kampar, 156ha was sold to Deslcon Properties Sdn Bhd. The livelihood of 100 farmers will be affected.

7. In Bidor, 28ha was sold to Selangor-based Bangsa Mahir Sdn Bhd. Bangsa Mahir’s nature of business is “activities of holding companies”.


Ex-MACC panel member laments board’s attitude in Azam Baki controversy



Ex-MACC panel member laments board’s attitude in Azam Baki controversy


Edmund Terence Gomez quit MACC’s Consultation and Corruption Prevention Panel last December over the Azam Baki share ownership issue.


PETALING JAYA: A former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission panel member who quit following apparent inaction over a report implicating the top anti-graft buster is bemoaning the manner in which the scandal has been dealt with.

Edmund Terence Gomez has also questioned the process of appointing his successor.


Gomez resigned from the Consultation and Corruption Prevention Panel (CCPP) in December after it failed to discuss reports of MACC chief Azam Baki’s alleged extensive ownership of corporate stock.

MACC’s advisory board (ACAB) apparently cleared Azam, with its chairman, Abu Zahar Ujang, saying he had adequately explained his ownership of more than two million shares.

According to Abu Zahar, the board was satisfied with the explanation and had determined that Azam had no pecuniary interest and there was no conflict of interest in the acquisition of the shares.

Subsequently, however, the six other members of ACAB issued a joint press statement disputing what Abu Zahar had said. They said the statement was not the board’s position but his personal view.

Gomez told FMT the board was, six months on, working “as if nothing had happened” in spite of this problem between Abu Zahar and the rest of its members.

“Since there was a clear disagreement between Abu Zahar and the rest of the members, the six of them should have resigned,” he said.


He said the government should have stepped in to review the advisory board’s handling of the situation. That it did not do so suggested a dereliction of duty by the prime minister, he said.

“What the prime minister and his Cabinet should have done is institute an independent investigation as soon as they became aware of the controversy in December,” he said.

The ACAB, he said, was established as a check and balance mechanism and it was “clearly not the case” in this matter.

Gomez also said he had been left “deeply upset” by how the controversy had panned out.

“We thought a change was imminent the way protests were mounting, including a public demonstration,” he said. “There was much pressure on the prime minister to act decisively by instituting an independent investigation and reforming MACC.”

He said it appeared that the Johor election shifted everyone’s attention from the controversy.

Referring to the selection process of his successor, Gomez said he had come to learn that “someone from MACC” had contacted an activist to offer him the post.

He said the appointment of panel members should be done by an independent body, adding that it was nonsensical for MACC to have a say on who should sit on the panel.

Since it was the prime minister who appointed the members of the panel, it was his office that should be responsible for handling the selection process, he said.

“This clearly needs to be reviewed. The selection process is problematic. Will the members really serve as a check and balance on the MACC? Are they truly independent?” he said.


Religious knowledge not mandatory, says Sarawak Museum after copping flak for job ad



Religious knowledge not mandatory, says Sarawak Museum after copping flak for job ad



The job advertisement published in Utusan Borneo on Wednesday. — Picture via Borneo Post


KUCHING, July 1 — The Sarawak Museum has dismissed claims that knowledge of Islam as one of the conditions in an advertisement for the post of an administrative assistant in the Turtle Management Board is discriminatory.

Responding to the allegations on social media, its director Tajuddin Mokhtar said even though the board preferred the applicant to have Islamic knowledge, the condition was not mandatory.


“If critics care to read between the lines, that particular condition is not mandatory but it has got something to do with Malay heritage and Islamic rites,” he told The Borneo Post.

Tajuddin asserted that the condition was definitely not racist because at one particular time, the Sarawak Museum had a Bidayuh holding the post.


The advertisement was published in Malay in the local daily, Utusan Borneo, on Wednesday and was met with criticism, particularly on Facebook.


Besides knowledge of Islam, the other conditions are that the applicant be between 21 and 35 years old, is capable of conversing and writing in English, have a minimum SPM or SPVM qualification with credit in Bahasa Malaysia, and resides in Kuching.

It also said that applicants who can swim and do not get seasick will be shortlisted. — Borneo Post


In Pasir Salak, voters see little chance of Tajuddin defending seat as independent



In Pasir Salak, voters see little chance of Tajuddin defending seat as independent



Sharul Hafiz Zam, 36, from Kampung Pulau Gajah said the area has been a BN stronghold for decades and it would be difficult for any independent — even Tajuddin — to overcome this. — Picture by Farhan Najib


KAMPUNG GAJAH, July 1 — Datuk Seri Tajuddin Abdul Rahman’s popularity in Pasir Salak alone would not be enough to overcome the disadvantages he faces should he contest without Umno and Barisan Nasional's backing, several residents here have predicted.

Voters interviewed by Malay Mail said the three-time MP would struggle to win over support from BN even if he could convince loyalists to switch their support.


Sharul Hafiz Zam, 36, from Kampung Pulau Gajah here said the area has been a BN stronghold for decades and it would be difficult for any independent — even Tajuddin — to overcome this.

At best, he said the Umno leader who has fallen out with the current leadership would get the backing of hardcore supporters and those with a vested interest in his victory.


Pasir Salak is a federal constituency in Perak Tengah District and Hilir Perak District. It has two state seats, namely Kampung Gajah and Sungai Manik. — Picture by Farhan Najib


“I don’t think he (Tajuddin) can win contesting independently. It has been BN all this while and if they put any candidate as long as under BN banner and definitely there is high chances of winning,” he told Malay Mail.

On June 27, Tajuddin claimed he was confident of defending the Pasar Salak federal seat even if he were dropped by Umno, following his sacking from the Malay nationalist party’s supreme council recently.

Tajuddin said he could contest as an independent that supports Umno, jokingly adding that he may even consider Islamist party PAS’ offer to fight under its banner.

Pensioner R Lingam, 71 from Kampung Goh Hong, Langkap, shares his views on Pasir Salak MP Datuk Seri Tajuddin Abdul Rahman, June 30, 2022. — Picture by Farhan Najib


Pensioner R Lingam, 71 from Kampung Goh Hong, Langkap, conceded that Tajuddin was prominent in the constituency. “But his popularity alone may not be able to get the support he needs to defend the seat.”

Another pensioner M Marimuthu 72, from Taman Pelangi, Langkap, said no independent candidate has ever come close to winning here and Tajuddin was not likely to be the first.

He also noted that the voters in Pasir Salak were primarily Malay who were already affiliated with either Umno and PAS, along with pockets of support for PKR, Bersatu, and Amanah.

“But the question now is, how Tajuddin will attract voters from these parties if he contest alone? I’m sure the supporters will vote for their respective party candidates,” he said.

A 68-year-old restaurateur from Langkap who asked to be named only as Ah Chai was also unconvinced of Tajuddin’s claim.

“I was born and raised here. Doing my business for 50 years now and it has been BN all this while. They always win with big majority. So, I think it’s difficult for Tajuddin to win as an Independent candidate,” he said.


Ah Chai, 68, from Langkap, who runs an economy rice restaurant, shares his view on Datuk Seri Tajuddin Abdul Rahman. — Picture by Farhan Najib



Still, not all voters were so quick to dismiss Tajuddin’s prospects outside of Umno.

“He (Tajuddin) is very prominent in the constituency. Almost every month there will be programmes for the people here. He is very well connected with most of the residents,” said Mohd Hamdan Zainal Aznam, 37, from Taman Murni here.

“I’m sure this plays a part when it comes to voting. The voters will want someone they know personally to represent them and this is why Tajuddin could still win even if he contests as an Independent candidate.”

PAS lifeline?

Earlier this week, PAS secretary-general, Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan told Tajuddin that the latter can join PAS at any time to continue his political career, and some Pasir Salak voters said this could give Tajuddin a fighting chance.

Abdul Rahim Ahmad Tahir, 47, from Kampung Selat Pulau said this might give him the needed support to win.

“Maybe he can win and maybe he can’t. The situation is too fluid for now. We don’t know how the PAS supporters and grassroot will react to this,” he said.

Another voter Mohd Rizal Ambiah, 40, from Kampung Pasir Salak here, said that the previous general election result showed the constituency could no longer be considered a BN stronghold, which meant Tajuddin could still win as a PAS candidate.

“In the previous general election, BN garnered 20,003 votes while Pakatan Harapan (PH) received 12,291 votes and PAS received 11,151 votes.

“If PH and PAS were not separated in the previous general election, BN would have definitely lost. So how then the constituency can still be said to be a BN stronghold?” he asked.

“Anything can happen in the election. We have seen it so many times. If Tajuddin can get half of the votes from his previous number and if PAS could maintain their previous vote record then it is certain he can win.”

Mohd Rizal also insisted that Tajuddin would get full support from PAS’ supporters and grassroots as these were always obedient to their party’s leaders.

However, one voter who asked not to be named said even PAS supporters were turned off by Tajuddin, saying his controversies and missteps were too high-profile to ignore.

“People, including PAS supporters, are aware of the problems and issues he caused. Things are different now. Social media plays an important part,” the person said.

He added that it was rumoured that Tajuddin had tried to insist that his son be selected to defend the seat, but that Umno president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi rejected this.