UEC: Two UMNO Leaders, Two Realities & One Very Confused Nation

OPINION | UEC: Two UMNO Leaders, Two Realities & One Very Confused Nation


13 Dec 2025 • 8:30 AM MYT


Fa Abdul
FA ABDUL is a former columnist of Malaysiakini & Free Malaysia Today (FMT)

Photo credit: Sinar Daily


What is the purpose of education? To acquire knowledge. To sharpen the mind. To prepare a generation to compete in a world that doesn’t care about our petty politics. Simple, right?


Apparently not - if you look at how two UMNO leaders are talking about the UEC.


On one side, you have Mohamad Hasan, insisting the UEC can only be recognised if it is aligned with “national aspirations” - which, in his definition, means the medium of instruction must be in Bahasa Malaysia. The whole certificate must essentially transform itself into BM before anyone can even discuss recognition.


On the other side, you have Johari Abdul Ghani, politely reminding Malaysia to chill. He says people should be free to choose the education system they prefer, and we should respect that diversity instead of politicising everything. In his view, the UEC debate shouldn’t be about enforcing uniformity - it should be about understanding different pathways.


Two men from the same party. Two completely different universes.


The language obsession makes no sense


Let’s ask a basic question: If UEC graduates can speak Bahasa Malaysia fluently, doesn’t that already meet the goal of nation-building? Why must the entire qualification suddenly switch its medium of instruction?


The UEC exists because the Chinese community wanted instruction in Chinese. That’s literally the point. Demanding that UEC be taught in BM is like saying O-Levels and A-Levels should also be conducted in BM or Malaysia shouldn’t recognise them.



Well then, by that logic - no O-Levels, no A-Levels, no Australian matriculation, no Singapore A-Level equivalent, no degrees from UK, US, China, or anywhere else.


Because guess what? None of them are conducted in BM.


Yet Malaysia recognises foreign degrees from Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard, NUS - all delivered in their own languages - without blinking. But suddenly UEC must be “pure BM” to be good enough?


That’s not national policy. That’s kampung mindset. Stone age edition.


Education isn't a Tool for insecurity politics


We’re living in a world that’s moving at lightning speed - AI, global markets, digital industries, multicultural talent pools. And here we are debating whether recognition should depend on the language the textbook was printed in.


Language alone has never magically created unity. Mutual respect does. Shared goals do. Opportunities do.



But every few years, the “Malay, Malay, Malay and nothing less” rhetoric resurfaces - loud, proud, and completely out of touch. It's ridiculous. It's annoying.


This obsession with linguistic purity has nothing to do with education and everything to do with insecurity.


Malaysia’s children deserve better than leaders trapped in a dark square room, clinging to old scripts while the rest of the world races ahead.


Two UMNO leaders, one big contradiction


While Johari says “Respect diverse education choices,” Mohamad says “Convert everything to BM or don’t even bother showing up.” One speaks like a leader preparing Malaysia for globalisation while the other sounds like he’s guarding a cultural museum.


And the rest of us? We’re left wondering which version of UMNO even represents the future.


If the real goal is unity, competitiveness, and progress, then we need to stop weaponising language and start focusing on what education actually means: knowledge, skills, and the ability to stand tall in the world.


Until then, the debate continues - not because Malaysians are confused, but because our leaders are.