Put the sprint coach on the first flight home

FMT:

Put the sprint coach on the first flight home



6 hours ago

Frankie D'Cruz


A teen sprinter was told to fake an injury so a slower teammate could take his place. Why is the coach who orchestrated it still at the SEA Games?

Malaysia entered the SEA Games in Bangkok with the usual expectations — discipline, integrity and faith in those guiding our athletes.

Instead, among the national contingent stands a coach accused of the unthinkable: telling an 18-year-old to lie, fabricate an injury and step aside for a slower senior sprinter.

That man is now in the games village, credentialled by Malaysia, surrounded by young athletes who rely on their coaches for trust, guidance and safety.

A figure facing allegations of coercion, document distortion, retaliation and abuse of authority should not be there.

Not for another hour. Not for another race. Not for another team meeting.

He should be on the first flight home.

Because a coach who allegedly tells a teenager to lie — in writing, step by step — is not just a threat to one athlete’s career.

He is a risk to every athlete under his influence, and to the integrity of the sport itself.


And this case, backed by WhatsApp messages, medical records and a formal letter from the family, is not a “miscommunication”.

Not a personality clash. Not a quibble over selection criteria.

It is a clear breach of authority, involving pressure on a minor, manipulation of information, intimidation and interference in selection — conduct Malaysian sport cannot tolerate.

The question is not whether the coach is guilty; that will be determined by due process.


The question is why he remains with the national team in Bangkok while that process unfolds.

Under global SafeSport standards in the UK, US and Australia, any allegation involving pressure on a minor, misuse of medical information, intimidation or behaviour affecting selection triggers immediate suspension pending inquiry.

Not “monitoring”. Not “waiting for the panel to meet”.

Immediate removal from athlete environments to prevent influence, tampering or repeat behaviour.

Malaysia’s decision to leave him in place, overseeing athletes, some minors, all vulnerable, is a failure of safeguarding.

Athletes in a games village are isolated from their families, dependent on coaches for daily decisions, and often afraid to speak.

It is the very environment where pressure can thrive if unchecked.

A coach under investigation for instructing a teenager to lie should not be mentoring or monitoring anyone.

This is not harsh. This is standard. And right now, Malaysia is falling below standard.

A sport with no guardrails

The case of Danish Irfan Tamrin exposes a deeper structural failure long whispered within athletics: coaches have disproportionate control over selection, with weak checks and no independent oversight.

Danish, one of the season’s top four sprinters with 10.61s, had every reason to expect fair SEA Games consideration.

He had results, momentum and consistency. What removed him was not performance — it was pressure.

The WhatsApp messages show the coach dictating a withdrawal letter, telling the teenager exactly what to write and asking him to cite “back pain” despite no diagnosis.

Danish’s response, “Write what, coach?”, should chill anyone familiar with athlete–coach power dynamics.

It is the voice of a boy who feels he has no choice.

When athletes comply not because they trust but because they fear consequences, the system is not a talent pathway; it is a pressure chamber.

The ISN contradiction reveals a wider institutional weakness

One of the most alarming elements is how the medical system was drawn into the saga.

Danish underwent a full assessment at the National Sports Institute (ISN). The result was unequivocal: he was fit to compete.

Fit — directly contradicting the withdrawal letter he had been told to submit.

This raises a fundamental question: what happens when athletes are instructed to “act injured” before seeing ISN?

It undermines the integrity of one of Malaysia’s key high-performance institutions.

Medical appraisals must reflect reality, not the agenda of coaches seeking to sway selection.

Once medical information becomes a tool, the entire sports-science ecosystem stands compromised.

A shadow over meritocracy

That the SEA Games 4x100m spot went to a senior sprinter with slower season times is not the issue — selectors may weigh experience, past form and relay chemistry.

The issue is if that place was safeguarded by forcing a younger, faster athlete to withdraw through deceit.

That crosses the line from discretion into manipulation, a serious breach internationally.

Meritocracy cannot survive if athletes believe places are predetermined by relationships rather than performances.

And when a coach manipulates the process, he does more than rob one athlete; he weakens the country’s best possible team.

Then comes the allegation of blacklisting.

When Danish’s family heard from a third party that the coach allegedly said, “Maybe after this, Danish will be blacklisted,” it confirmed their worst fear: that refusing to comply or speaking up could end their son’s path.

Whether the remark was real, exaggerated or misheard is not the point. The point is that athletes believe blacklisting is possible.

That belief alone is a systemic red flag. When careers depend on silence, wrongdoing multiplies.

What Malaysia must do — now

Malaysia Athletics has said its disciplinary committee will investigate, but that is the wrong starting point.

This requires an independent selection review by a panel with no ties to the national body.

The wider ecosystem must also respond:

• Suspend the coach immediately. This is not punitive; it is protective.
• Guarantee Danish immunity from retaliation. Put it in writing — publicly.
• Clarify ISN’s independence. Medical integrity must not be traded away.
• Establish a real SafeSport mechanism. Athlete welfare cannot be managed by ad-hoc committees and silence.

If the WhatsApp messages are authenticated and the pressure proven, consequences should follow international precedent:

• revocation of coaching licence,
• multi-year ban,
• prohibition from working with youth athletes,
• and, if blacklisting threats are verified, a lifetime ban.

This is the standard Malaysia should uphold. It is a referendum on how seriously we take athlete welfare.

A country cannot aspire to be a sporting nation while tolerating behaviour that corrodes trust in its pathways.

Put the coach on the first flight home, and fix the sport so no Malaysian athlete ever feels this fear again.

***

Hannah, jangan tidur OK?