Friday, August 01, 2025

Kamala Harris says she doesn’t plan to return to ‘broken’ system of US politics


Guardian:


Kamala Harris says she doesn’t plan to return to ‘broken’ system of US politics

Former vice-president talked to Colbert in first interview since election, after declining bid for California governor




Kamala Harris has said that she currently has no desire to re-enter “the system” of American politics because it is “broken”.

On Thursday night the defeated Democratic party’s presidential nominee, who replaced Joe Biden late in the 2024 campaign after he dropped his re-election bid, gave her first interview since losing the election to Donald Trump, talking to Stephen Colbert on The Late Show.

After she announced she will not run for the governorship of California just a day earlier, Harris told the TV show that it was about something more “basic” than whether she wanted to run for something else instead – with the subtext being whether she will attempt a White House run again in 2028.

“Recently I made the decision that I just – for now – I don’t want to go back in the system. I think it’s broken,” she said, provoking a collective groan from the studio audience. Colbert later returned to the subject, saying that her remark was harrowing.

“Well, but it’s also evident, isn’t it?” she said.

Describing herself as a “devout public servant”, the former vice-president added: “I always believed, that as fragile as our democracy is, our systems would be strong enough to defend our most fundamental principles. And I think right now that they’re not as strong as they need to be. And for now I don’t want to go back into that system.”

Harris’s choice of The Late Show as the channel for her first post-election defeat interview was pointed. The most-watched talk show was cancelled last month by the CBS network that pleaded financial stress, though the decision was widely denounced as being politically motivated.

The cancellation was announced after Colbert had criticized CBS and its parent company Paramount Global for reaching a $16m settlement with Trump. The president had sued CBS News over an interview on the 60 Minutes show with Harris at the height of last year’s presidential campaign, which Trump claimed had been manipulated in her favour.

None of this febrile back story was mentioned by either Colbert or Harris on Thursday. But she did delivery a passionate lament for the numbers of people who she said had “capitulated” to the aggressive second Trump administration.

When Colbert invited her to say “I told you so” after she had predicted many of Trump’s most contentious moves – including Medicaid cuts, ignoring court orders, and “massive tax cuts to the rich” – she replied: “But Stephen, what I did not predict was the capitulation.”

She went on: “Perhaps it’s naive of me … there should be many who consider themselves to be guardians of our system and our democracy who just capitulated, and I didn’t see that coming.”

The timing of the interview was also poignant, as she was considered to be the automatic frontrunner if she had decided to run to become the next governor of California.

Her wider remarks on “the system” help explain that decision, though they still notably left room for another possible presidential run. In the meantime, Harris has a book to sell, 107 Days, which she name-checked copiously on the Late Show in advance of its publication next month.

The book, as its title suggests, relates the story of the shortest presidential run of all time. She said it would give a “behind-the-scenes sharing” of those intense days.

Whether it is to sell the book or to lay the foundations for another presidential bid remains a moot point, but Harris said she wanted to use the next period to “travel the country and listen to people. I don’t want it to be transactional, where I’m asking for their vote.”

Harris admitted that it had taken her months following her defeat before she had the strength to tune into the news again. “You know, I’m just not into self-mutilation,” she said. Instead there had been “lots of cooking shows”, her top choice being The Kitchen.

Economy is getting worse under Trump’s leadership, Americans say in new poll on eve of his tariff D-Day




Economy is getting worse under Trump’s leadership, Americans say in new poll on eve of his tariff D-Day


Trump has announced a new wave of countries affecting dozens of countries - but American voters are not impressed with his strategy


John Bowden
in Washington, D.C.
Friday 01 August 2025 09:23 BST




Awkward moment Trump leaves Starmer squirming over Family Farm Tax


A new poll shows Donald Trump underwater on the issue of his tariff agenda just as the president announced a new wave of levies affecting dozens of countries.

On Thursday night, Trump signed an executive order that sets new tariffs on U.S. trading partners that are due to go into effect on August 7. Canada is one of the countries hardest hit, facing an increased rate of 35 percent.

However, while Trump has been gung-ho on threatening other nations with stiffer levies, it would seem voters are not so convinced it is the right approach. Trump won a second term in November boosted by the same issues that propelled him to victory the first time around. Concerns over immigration and the economy were at the forefront of voters' minds, though he received a key boost from the implosion of Joe Biden’s campaign.


Donald Trump’s strongest polling was on the issues of immigration and the economy. He’s losing ground on both (Reuters)


A Times of London/YouGov poll out Thursday said the president’s tariff agenda is one of the biggest anchors driving down his approval numbers.

Some 48 percent of Americans graded Trump’s job performance over the first six months of his administration as poor, compared to just 21 percent who rated it excellent, 16 percent who rated it good and 11 percent who rated it as fair. On the core issue of tariffs, Trump is clearly tanking — despite months of pronouncements from the White House of America’s impending “Golden Age.”

Four in ten Americans say that Trump’s tariffs will make the country poorer and stifle economic growth. Just 26 percent believe the White House’s line about economic prosperity coming down the pike.

And most alarmingly for the White House, inflation still ranks as the No. 1 issue for voters. That could prove to be dangerous ground for the president as the summer concludes with potentially sharp increases to consumer prices stemming from the president’s reciprocal tariffs.

A CBS News poll further dove into the president’s declining numbers on the economy.

Six in 10 of voters under 30 now say that Trump’s policies are harming the economy, and making them worse off financially. Seven in 10 voters in the same category say that they didn’t believe the president is focused enough on lowering prices for consumers.

If Trump is losing ground with the younger voters he peeled off from Democrats in 2024, Republicans are set for trouble in the midterm elections next year. Polling isn’t yet registering significant voter support for the GOP budget reconciliation package, the “big, beautiful bill”, as it’s been overshadowed by the president’s tariffs and mass deportation agenda, among other issues.

Another factor driving down Trump’s numbers with younger voters is Jeffrey Epstein.



open image in gallery
Tulsi Gabbard led efforts to accuse Barack Obama of ‘treason’ as the White House spun distractions on Jeffrey Epstein (Getty Images)


The Justice Department blew up the investigation into Epstein, a convicted pedophile and sex criminal who died in 2019, when in early July the agency declared that the billionaire financier died by suicide, as had previously been found, and that no evidence linking him to accomplices, other than Ghislaine Maxwell, was uncovered.


The sudden declaration that the “Epstein Client List”, which Vice President JD Vance and others in the administration pledged to release, supposedly did not exist at all erupted into a wildfire on the MAGA right, particularly among Trump’s younger supporters.

Trump then spent the month of July embracing a series of increasingly obvious attempts at distraction, infuriating many and driving speculation even higher.

The Times/YouGov poll found that a much larger share of voters, more than four in ten, think that Trump and his team have partially or completely lied in their public statements regarding the case. Less than 20 percent of Americans believe them.

Immigration has been another issue where the president has lost ground as the White House and Department of Homeland Security have accelerated mass deportation programs under his second term. Images of immigration enforcement raids have caused massive protests in Los Angeles and alarmed many Americans including Trump-supporting independents around the country.

Nearly every poll on the Decision Desk HQ Average, with the exception of two surveys conducted by Republican outfits, now shows Trump with popularity ratings in the negative, some by double digits.

Some pollsters have speculated that Trump began at a deficit other presidents escaped in their first six months due in large part to the circumstances of his 2024 victory and the rank unpopularity that the Democratic Party encouraged with its jumbled mess of a re-election campaign for Biden and later Kamala Harris.

Coming into 2025, the president was already burdened by some of the highest disapproval ratings of any incoming president in history.


Opinion: PJ defies state govt directive to privatise parking operations





Opinion: PJ defies state govt directive to privatise parking operations


1 Aug 2025 • 3:26 PM MYT



Citizen Nades
A legally qualified journalist and a good governance champion



Image Credit: Malay Mail


When it comes to standing up to authoritative directives that are seen as unfair, unproductive, or destructive, it boils down to the mettle of the people who stand up and say “no”.


Three state-council engagements did not yield the desired results, but rather a rebuff. The cajoling was rejected, the threats muffed, and even the sweeteners were denied.


Yesterday, Members of the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) stood as the last bastion against directives being imposed on local authorities.


According to a state government source, whilst three other local authorities fell by the wayside, sacrificing millions in revenue, Petaling Jaya City Council stood defiantly against the proposed privatisation of street parking.


If not seen as defiance, it was a show of strength. Their collective decision reflected the wishes of the residents, exercising their powers and carrying out their duties as representatives of the people.


They baulked at this directive from the state, as it was seen as unfair and unjustly taking away the much-needed revenue and handing it over to a third party.


Doubling collection, but at what cost?


But is it the end of the line for the much-touted privatisation pushed by the state government? Not likely.


PJ mayor Zahri Samingon said MBPJ supported the move as it was a policy approved by the state executive council; the privatisation process must not disrupt the existing parking situation in the city.



“One of our conditions is that the revenue (MBPJ earns) must be the same or higher than what we get currently,” he said.


This means the private contractor must guarantee an annual income of RM18 million, which it has so far refused to provide.


However, in other areas administered by three local authorities - Subang Jaya City Council (MBSJ), Shah Alam City Council (MBSA), and Selayang Municipal Council (MPS) - parking operations are being conducted as scheduled today under a privatisation scheme announced by the Selangor government.


After days of deliberations, discussions, and debates touching on legal, ethical, and principled issues affecting the community, with a swoosh of the pen, the income from street parking has been halved, with the other half going into the pockets of the company awarded the franchise.


Two weeks ago, Selangor state executive councillor Ng Suee Lim stated that discussions were still ongoing regarding the privatisation of street parking management across four local authorities, with a final agreement expected to be signed by Aug 1.



His key selling points include doubling the current collection rate from 30 percent to 60 percent by utilising artificial intelligence and installing 1,900 CCTVs, which cost RM200 million.


However, the cost, although not astronomical, was amusing - at RM110,000 each, one would assume that they were made of gold or diamond-studded.


As unconvincing as they were, Ng has not given up on Petaling Jaya and is still at it, trying his persuasive talents but to no avail.


Two days ago, he was still at it, according to his post on Facebook: “Exciting, beautiful, and wonderful Wednesday! This morning, I convened a meeting with Bukit Gasing assemblyperson Rajiv Rishyakaran, Kampung Tunku assemblyman Lim Yi Wei, and the Selangor Menteri Besar Incorporated (MBI) to thoroughly discuss the Smart Parking System implemented by MBPJ, jointly seeking a mutually beneficial solution.”



But what can be “mutually beneficial” when one party is going to forfeit 50 percent of its revenue? Would anyone in his or her right mind give away half of his or her hard-earned money?


Perhaps Ng underestimated the PJ councillors, though this is not the first time they stood up against unfair directives and decisions.


In June 2023, the councillors stood up to then mayor Azhan Amir, who dared to assert his supposed authority, ignoring the powers vested in the councillors and claiming that they are there only to “give input on social and political matters.”


What about those who conceded?


Let’s look at Shah Alam. According to mayor Fauzi Mohd Yatim, MBSA collected RM21.9 million in parking fees and RM8.9 million from compound fines last year.


Between January and June this year, MBSA collected RM10 million in parking fees and RM3.6 million in compound fines.



So, with a shortfall of about RM10 million, in what areas are the cuts expected? Would it affect cleanliness and sanitation or maintenance and upkeep?


For now, the council will have to grapple with the shortfall, or it will resort to increasing charges in other areas.


The same for the Selayang and Subang Jaya councils, but one question that has yet to be satisfactorily answered: If it ain’t broken, why fix it?


Why the need for privatisation? Ng argues for the increase in revenue, but is it guaranteed? Can the private contractor guarantee such income?


Round One may have gone to the state, but Round Two, though two years away, is more crucial. That is when the same people who made all those promises of “working for the people” return to your doorsteps seeking a fresh mandate.


The reaction and response they will get may not be music to the ears of those seeking your vote, but they could be loud and devastating.


Malaysia looks to China’s Comac jets over Boeing and Airbus delays




Friday, 1 August, 2025 - 8:52 PM


Malaysia looks to China’s Comac jets over Boeing and Airbus delays





KOTA KINABALU: Malaysia’s Transport Minister Anthony Loke says Southeast Asia’s growing air travel demand and delivery backlogs from Airbus and Boeing are sparking regional interest in China’s Comac C919 jet.

Chinese manufacturer Comac is positioning its C919, the country’s first home-grown narrow body airliner, as a cheaper, faster alternative to Western-built aircraft.

Loke confirmed that budget carrier AirAsia and new airline Air Borneo are amongst those exploring options with Comac.

“All airlines are looking for faster delivery and more affordable options. There’s a long wait for Airbus and Boeing aircraft. Comac is definitely being considered," Loke told the South China Morning Post.

Featuring over 100 booths it is one of the largest trade and culture showcases ever held in East Malaysia.
He added that AirAsia has expressed interest, but no deals have been finalised and he is not involved in the commercial discussions.


M’sian Woman Says She Was Treated Like A Foreigner At Kelantan Govt Clinic For Speaking Standard Malay


Weirdkaya:


M’sian Woman Says She Was Treated Like A Foreigner At Kelantan Govt Clinic For Speaking Standard Malay


They didn’t care where she was from, after 2 years, they just expected her to speak Kelate.



Cover image via CanvaWikipedia


Ever found yourself nodding and smiling awkwardly just to hide the fact that you had no idea what the other person just said?

For one Malaysian woman living in Kelantan, that has been her reality for two whole years.

What started as a simple post on Threads about a frustrating experience has now gone viral. It sparked a broader discussion among Malaysians about language, respect, and the expectations of professionalism.


‘I had no idea what that was’

The woman recalled an incident at a government clinic where she was met with confusion, not because of the medical issue, but because of the language barrier.


For illustration purposes only. Photo via Internet


Should I have just guessed what she meant? She said ‘ubak comor’. I had no idea what that was.”

Even after asking the pharmacist to repeat herself, the same word, “comor” was repeated with no further clarification.

When she guessed and asked, “Do you mean sapu (apply)?” the pharmacist finally responded with a dismissive “Hoo laaahhh! (yes!!!)”

It wasn’t just the word itself that left a bad taste but also the attitude that came with it.


‘Use standard Malay in professional settings’

Her post wasn’t just about being left out of a conversation. It raised a larger concern about communication in professional spaces.


Photo via Canva


According to her, it wasn’t wrong for people to speak dialect casually. But in formal settings like hospitals, government offices, or schools, standard Bahasa Malaysia should be the default to ensure everyone is on the same page, especially those who aren’t from the area.


Dialect is fine when it’s just a few words here and there. But when the whole conversation is in a different ‘language’, it becomes a problem,” she explained.

This point resonated with many Malaysians, who began sharing their own experiences with dialect-related miscommunication.


‘Professionalism comes first’


As the post gained traction, the comments section filled up quickly. Some were supportive, some frustrated, and others outright angry.

Many agreed that it can be isolating when people insist on using heavy dialect in places where clear communication is important.


“I get annoyed when Kelantanese speak thick dialect even though they’re living in Johor. Do they think everyone understands them?” one user wrote.

Some even took it a step further, arguing that refusal to use standard Malay in professional roles should disqualify someone from those positions altogether.

‘Don’t want to use proper Malay? Go sell fish at the market. Know the difference between the pasar and the office.’


Clearly, the issue hit a nerve and sparked broader reflections on what it means to be “professional” in Malaysia.

Not all the responses were critical. In fact, several Kelantanese netizens came forward to defend the original poster and distance themselves from the behaviour she described.

“I’m Kelantanese, living in Kedah for over a decade. Still can’t speak Kedah dialect but people here are nice. Those who treat outsiders that way, no manners lah,” said one user.


Others even shared their own stories of being judged, ironically, by their own people for not conforming to dialect or food preferences.

‘I once ordered nasi kerabu without budu. The makcik shouted, ‘Darat lah mu dok make budu!’ (So fussy of you for not eating budu!). Like chill, aunty, it’s just food.’

While dialects are a rich and beautiful part of Malaysia’s diverse identity, most netizens agreed that they should be used with care, especially in situations where understanding and clarity are crucial.

‘It’s not like she asked them to speak English or German. It’s just standard Malay, every Malaysian should know that.‘


‘The Era Of Big Gov’t Is Over’ – Yeo Bee Yin Opposes EPF Monthly Payout Scheme


Weirdkaya:


‘The Era Of Big Gov’t Is Over’ – Yeo Bee Yin Opposes EPF Monthly Payout Scheme


Yeo said it was necessary to voice concern early.



Cover image via WeirdKayaYouTube/PARLIMEN MALAYSIA


Former Energy, Science, Technology, Environment and Climate Change Minister and Member of Parliament for Puchong, Yeo Bee Yin, has spoken out against a proposed Employees Provident Fund (EPF) reform, warning the government not to make monthly withdrawals compulsory for retirees.



Let retirees choose

Although the 13th Malaysia Plan (RMK13) only mentioned that the government “will explore” a monthly payout structure, Yeo said it was necessary to voice concern early.


EPF is people’s hard-earned money and the government should let people decide what to do with their savings,” she wrote on Facebook.


Photo by WeirdKaya. For illustration purposes only.


What’s being proposed?

Under the RMK13 plan, one of the suggestions is to study a shift from lump-sum EPF withdrawals to a fixed monthly payment model.

The aim is to prevent retirees from depleting their savings too quickly and to ensure longer-term financial stability.


However, it has sparked debate over whether the move should be optional or enforced.

Read our coverage here:


‘Not children’

Yeo criticised any move toward making such a model mandatory, saying retirees are capable of managing their own finances.


Retirees are no longer children. They don’t need the government to tell them what’s the best use for their savings,” she said.

To reinforce her point, she quoted former US President Bill Clinton: “The era of big government is over.”