Two US warships visited Penang

Murray Hunter


Two US warships visited Penang


Mar 18, 2026





Photos Sherwynd Kessler


It was confirmed that two US warships from the US Navy’s 5th Fleet made a brief logistical visit to Penang’s northern container terminal. The visit from March 14 to 16 reflected the close and enduring military cooperation Malaysia has with the United States.

On March 15 the Penang-based military aviation tracker Sherwynd Kessler posted photographs of two littoral combat ships (LCS) the USS Tulsa and USS Santa Barbara that had docked at North Butterworth Container Terminal, some 5,600 km from the Persian Gulf. Both these ships were assigned to minesweeping duties in the Persian Gulf before the war.

The timing of this visit came when many nations have forbidden any US military planes, ships and other equipment from transiting their nation’s territories. This includes several European countries including Switzerland, and Spain.

On February 28 the United States together with Israel launched an unprovoked attack on Iran. One of the first air raids killed the Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khameni, while another raid murdered 170 school girls aged 6 to 12 at the Shajareh Tayyebeh Girl’s elementary school. These are all very serious war crimes.

Last October, Putrajaya signed a memorandum of understanding with the Pentagon on defence cooperation. The US is now carrying out saturation bombing of civilians in Iranian cities including hospitals and schools.

The two naval ships are most likely heading back to the gulf to participate in this war that more and more people are becoming critical of. The US appears to have returned to its decapitation strategy with the seeking out and killing of Iranian leader. A tope security chief Ali Larijani was killed just a couple of days ago.

While NATO member countries are refusing to join the war against Iran, the US National Counterterrorism chief Joe Kent has handed in an immediate resignation from his position to US President Trump in protest. Joe Kent said that Washington had been dragged into the war at the behest of Israel, which is shaping up to become another ‘never ending; conflict like Vietnam.

At face value it appears Malaysia is directly supporting the United States and Israel. More realistically, it looks like Malaysia is positioning itself more behind Saudi Arabia that has strongly condemned Iran’s attack on the gulf states. Malaysia deeply values its diplomatic relationship with Saudi Arabia.

Through diplomatic channels (e.g., Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan’s talks with his Iranian counterpart), Saudi Arabia has explicitly warned Tehran to stop attacks on the kingdom, or Riyadh may be forced to allow US forces to use its bases for operations and/or retaliate directly. This is framed as defensive necessity rather than enthusiasm for joining the war.

The opposition coalition Perikatan Nasional (PN) explicitly called on the federal government to provide a detailed explanation regarding the presence of these US naval assets in Malaysian waters. PN secretary-general Takiyuddin Hassan highlighted concerns that this could contradict Malaysia’s neutral stance (particularly in relation to the Middle East conflict), potentially undermining public confidence and the country’s international image. He urged clarification on the purpose, status, route of the ships (e.g., whether in transit to areas like the Strait of Hormuz), and alignment with Malaysia’s non-alignment policy.

Defence Minister Khaled Nordin responded by stating that the port call followed established Malaysian procedures for foreign naval visits, which are routine. Khalid said “These stops allow for logistical arrangements such as replenishments. Any foreign naval vessel must submit a request through its country to the Royal Malaysian Navy, which forwards it to the Foreign Ministry for approval.”

There are some concerns that Malaysia’s role in facilitating or being indirectly involved in military operations linked to the conflict could be detrimental to the nation’s interest. Assisting the United States which is aligned with Israel could add to further division within the Islamic community of nations. Indirectly, Malaysia is supporting an adversary which is killing innocent Muslims on a continuous basis in Iran. As such this could be counterproductive to Malaysia’s aims at progressing within the BRICS procedures to become a full member.

On the other side, Malaysia has done what some other countries are refusing to do. That is host armored ships and give access to military aircraft flying over sovereign territory.

Time will tell whether there will be any diplomatic repercussions to the Malaysian approach.

The diesel asymmetry and what Malaysia’s subsidy design means for mobility

FMT:

The diesel asymmetry and what Malaysia’s subsidy design means for mobility


Letter to the Editor


There is a gap between the depth and design of diesel-related support and the protection afforded to private motorists

From Wan Agyl Wan Hassan

Malaysia’s BUDI95 programme that entitles qualified motorists to fuel subsidies reflects a deliberate policy choice to shield households from the impact of sharp global oil price volatility.


That protection matters as Brent crude surged to US$119 (RM468) per barrel on March 9 in response to the escalation of the West Asia conflict. As a result, the government’s monthly fuel subsidy bill rose from RM700 million to RM3.2 billion.

However, there is a structural dimension to Malaysia’s current fuel pricing landscape that merits closer examination, one that sits beneath the weekly price headlines and touches on the long-term design of how we protect mobility for all Malaysians, not just those who drive.


The price of diesel has risen by as much as 80 sen per litre in Peninsular Malaysia in recent days. The government has maintained subsidised diesel rates for public land transport operators at RM1.88 per litre and for goods transport at RM2.15. It has also raised the BUDI Diesel cash assistance from RM200 to RM300 per month.

These are meaningful measures. But the question is whether they are sufficient to absorb the sustained cost pressure operators face when global prices remain elevated and volatile.

This is pertinent given the removal of broad-based diesel subsidies in Peninsular Malaysia in June 2024, a fiscally necessary reform that strengthened Malaysia’s budget position and curbed subsidy leakage.

The current discussion is not about reversing that progress. It is about the next layer of precision in how we design support mechanisms as global volatility intensifies.


The structural issue

When diesel prices rise sharply and rapidly, the impact moves through the system. It affects bus operating costs, freight rates and the price of moving goods from warehouses to shelves. Ultimately, it surfaces in the cost of living for the same households BUDI95 is designed to protect.

This is what I describe as a subsidy asymmetry — not the absence of diesel support, but a gap in that support’s depth and design relative to the protection afforded to private motorists.

The household that saves at the pump through BUDI95 may find those savings partially offset by rising transport fares, higher food prices and reduced service reliability, all consequences of residual diesel cost pressure flowing through the supply and mobility chain.


I want to be precise about what I am not arguing for. Restoring broad-based diesel subsidies would be fiscally regressive and would undermine the subsidy rationalisation gains of the past two years.

That is not the case being made here. Nor is this a criticism of the existing tiered diesel pricing and BUDI Diesel assistance, which represent a genuine and necessary layer of protection.

The question is whether that layer is structurally adequate, when global oil prices surge to levels that multiply the government’s monthly fuel subsidy bill more than fourfold.

The more precise question is this: does Malaysia’s current subsidy architecture, which already distinguishes between diesel tiers for public transport, goods transport and private use, go far enough in protecting the operating viability of public mobility services during periods of extreme price stress?

And does the design of that protection account for the cumulative cost burden that operators face when volatility is sustained, not episodic?

Public transport operators face a structurally different challenge from private logistics companies. Bus fares are regulated and service obligations are fixed.

The impact

When fuel costs rise significantly, the market does not self-correct. A public bus operator absorbs the cost quietly over time, until it shows up not as an immediate service cut, but as deferred maintenance, reduced frequency and deteriorating reliability.

For government-linked operators, public service obligations mean losses are often absorbed internally before they become visible. But that absorption has limits, and sustained cost pressure eventually affects the quality and reach of services.

Think of what that means in practice. For a mother in Teluk Intan, a young worker in Kuala Pilah or a student in Segamat, the bus is not a lifestyle choice, but the only available connection to employment, education and economic participation. When service deteriorates, they do not switch modes. They lose access.

Malaysia’s National Transport Policy targets a public transport modal share, the proportion of daily journeys made by public rather than private transport of 40% by 2030. We are currently at approximately 20%.

Closing that gap requires not just infrastructure investment but sustained service viability. A subsidy architecture that inadvertently pressures the operating economics of public transport works structurally against that national target.

A way forward

Other countries have navigated this design challenge. Ireland operates a targeted diesel rebate scheme specifically for qualified road transport operators, providing partial cost relief when diesel prices exceed a defined threshold without restoring broad consumer subsidies.

Niger offered temporary targeted support to transport businesses during its own diesel subsidy reform, recognising that the mobility system needed protection even as consumer subsidies were rationalised.

Malaysia already has the institutional architecture to differentiate between diesel tiers, and the existing subsidised rates for transport operators reflect that capacity.

The next step is to build a more dynamic mechanism upon that foundation that adjusts support levels in response to sustained price stress, rather than relying solely on fixed rates and periodic cash top-ups.

The design details matter, and they require careful work. But the policy question itself is worth raising now, while the conversation about fuel pricing continues, and the policy window is open.

Getting subsidy design right is not purely a fiscal question, but also of mobility equity. Malaysians with the fewest options like those in peri-urban areas and secondary towns, where the bus is the only mode available, are also the least protected when the system that serves them comes under sustained financial pressure.

Malaysia’s subsidy rationalisation journey has been one of the region’s more credible fiscal reform stories. The government’s willingness to absorb a RM3.2 billion monthly subsidy bill to protect Malaysians from the current price shock is a demonstration of that commitment.

The next chapter of that journey is not about retreating from reform, but about applying the same discipline and precision to protecting the mobility system the reform was designed to serve.



Wan Agyl Wan Hassan is a transport expert.

DAP leaders publicly rebuke own deputy minister over appearance with activist Arun

DAP leaders publicly rebuke own deputy minister over appearance with activist Arun



Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M. Kulasegaran speaks at the Dewan Negara in Kuala Lumpur on December 11, 2024. — Bernama pic

Wednesday, 18 Mar 2026 3:55 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, March 18 — Four DAP leaders today publicly rebuked Deputy Minister M. Kulasegaran for his presence at a court complex with an activist facing charges, saying the action invited “public controversy” and does not represent the party’s official stance.

In a joint statement, DAP central executive committee (CEC) members Sheikh Umar Bagharib Ali, Young Syefura Othman, and Syahredzan Johan, along with Bukit Bendera MP Syerleena Abdul Rashid, said they were in “complete disagreement” with their fellow party veteran’s actions.

They said that Kulasegaran should have been more mindful of how his actions would be seen, given his official role as a deputy minister in the Prime Minister's Department.

“His position in the government demands a higher level of sensitivity towards public perception, particularly concerning the principle that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done,” the statement read.


The group also insisted that Kulasegaran’s actions were personal and not a party-sanctioned decision.

“Any act of solidarity towards Arun Doraisamy does not represent the stance of DAP,” they said.

The criticism comes a day after Kulasegaran was seen at the Jawi Magistrate’s Court with activist Arun Dorasamy, who was there to face charges of making statements conducive to public mischief.


In his defence yesterday, Kulasegaran explained that he was already in Penang for a meeting and only stopped by the court complex for a brief, coincidental meeting.

He insisted he was not present in the courtroom and had only spoken to Arun to advise him to trust the legal process.

The DAP leaders today concluded by proposing a “middle-ground approach” for the party, urging it to uphold the principle of “innocent until proven guilty” while avoiding any action that could create a perception of interference or partisanship.

Trump confirms meeting with China’s Xi Jinping delayed as war on Iran rages

Trump confirms meeting with China’s Xi Jinping delayed as war on Iran rages

US President Donald Trump delays his trip to Beijing due to Iran war while also seeking China’s help to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, in Busan, South Korea, in October 2025 [Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters]

By Erin Hale
Published On 18 Mar 2026


US President Donald Trump has confirmed he is delaying plans to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the end of the month, as the US-Israeli war on Iran continues to consume most of Washington’s focus.

“We are resetting the meeting,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday. “We’re working with China. They were fine with it.”

Recommended Stories

Who is Joe Kent, and why did he resign as Trump’s counterterrorism chief?


Trump’s comments that he wants to remain in Washington come as the war against Iran extends into its third week and the Strait of Hormuz remains closed to almost all global shipping.

“Because of the war, I want to be here. I have to be here,” Trump said.

Trump was scheduled to visit Beijing from March 31 to April 2. The president said he now plans to visit in “about five weeks” or towards the end of April. His last state visit to China was in 2017, during his first term.

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Tuesday that the US and China “remain in communication” about Trump’s plans to visit.

Trump and Xi were expected to discuss a range of issues, from trade tariffs and Chinese export controls on rare earth minerals and magnets, to the US relationship with Taiwan and Chinese fentanyl exports.

The US-China trade war was put on pause in October when Xi and Trump signed a truce following a meeting in South Korea, and both sides have been working on a more comprehensive trade agreement to resolve their dispute.



Trump, Xi to hold high-stakes talks as US strikes on Iran test fragile US–China trade ties



Beirut building turned to rubble by Israeli attack



China: Transition to electric vehicles softens the effect of the Iran war


While China and Xi were in Trump’s crosshairs at the start of his second term last year, the president’s tone towards both has softened since his meeting with the Chinese leader in South Korea.

“I look forward to seeing President Xi; he looks forward to seeing me, I think,” Trump said from the White House. “We have a very good relationship with China. It’s much different than it was in the past.”

Trump has also signalled that he is seeking China’s help to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which has been largely blocked by Tehran since the US and Israel launched their war on Iran 19 days ago.

The waterway is a critical conduit for global trade and Middle East oil exports, and the price of oil has fluctuated significantly due to its closure and constricting fuel supplies.

Trump told The Financial Times that China was among the group of countries that should lobby Tehran to reopen the strait.

Trump previously accused Tehran and Beijing of belonging to the “Axis of Autocracy” due to their close economic ties, as China is Iran’s largest trading partner. China has also supplied Tehran with critical technology to support electronic warfare, some of which has been on display in recent weeks.

If the strait remains closed and the war continues, Trump could still see himself on the back foot when his meeting with Xi next takes place, said Ali Wyne, senior researcher of US-China relations at the International Crisis Group.

Proponents of the Trump administration’s foreign policy had hoped that Operation Epic Fury, as the US campaign on Iran has been named, “would enhance President Trump’s negotiating posture vis-a-vis President Xi by underscoring his willingness to take dramatic, unexpected actions”, Wyne said.

“The gambit, however, has quickly boomeranged. Facing the severest oil supply shock in history, Trump is now exhorting Xi to help him reopen the world’s most vital waterway, the Strait of Hormuz,” he said.

***

Clown was attempting to "fix" China up by seizing Venezuela and Iran, two of China's oil sources (about 20%).

Israel bombs central Beirut, killing 6, strafes south, east Lebanon

Israel bombs central Beirut, killing 6, strafes south, east Lebanon

Wave of Israeli air attacks launched as ground offensive widens in south where Hezbollah are fighting Israeli forces

Firefighters are seen at the site of an Israeli air strike in Beirut's Bashoura neighbourhood on March 18, 2026. Lebanon said Israel struck central Beirut early March 18 without warning, killing at least six people, as the Israeli military announced it was targeting the country's south [Ibrahim Amro/AFP]

By Al Jazeera Staff, AFP and Reuters
Published On 18 Mar 2026


Israel has attacked a building in Bashoura, a neighbourhood in the heart of Beirut, Lebanon’s National News Agency (NNA) reported, with a blast and smoke rising over the area shortly after Israel issued an evacuation threat for the site.

The attack was part of a deadly wave of Israeli strikes across Lebanon that killed at least 20 people and wounded 24 on Wednesday, according to the country’s Ministry of Public Health, with raids stretching from the capital through southern and eastern parts of the country, a devastating front in the wider United States-Israel war against Iran embroiling the region.

Recommended Stories

Israeli attacks on Lebanon may amount to war crimes, UN rights office says


At least six people were killed in the air strikes in Beirut, with dozens injured.

Al Jazeera’s correspondent in Beirut, Zeina Khodr, reported that intense Israeli attacks hit multiple regions across Lebanon, including central Beirut, overnight.

Speaking from in front of a 15-storey building struck in one of the attacks, Khodr said its lower floors had been targeted a week earlier. In the early hours, however, the structure was completely demolished, with the Israeli army claiming Hezbollah had stored cash there.

“You can see the widespread damage across this whole neighbourhood,” Khodr said.



Israeli air strike flattens residential building in Beirut



Iraq’s capital Baghdad rocked by powerful blasts near US embassy



Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Saudi Arabia intercept missiles, drones


Israel’s military said it had launched what it described as limited ground operations in southern Lebanon, issuing evacuation threats for residents of four towns near the Zahrani River and the Tyre area, warning them to head north immediately.

Lebanon’s NNA also reported strikes on Tyre and the nearby area of Al-Burj Al-Shamali in the pre-dawn hours.

At least four people were killed in an Israeli attack that targeted four houses in the town of Sahmar in eastern Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley.

The intensifying assault has now killed at least 912 people in Lebanon, including 111 children, and wounded more than 2,200 since Israel launched its offensive on March 2, according to Lebanese Health Ministry figures.

More than one million people have been forced from their homes. The United Nations warned on Tuesday that Israeli attacks on residential buildings and civilian infrastructure may constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law.

A spokesperson for the UN human rights office said that deliberately targeting civilians or civilian objects “amounts to a war crime”, adding that Israel’s sweeping displacement orders for southern Lebanon may themselves violate international law.

Khodr said that Hezbollah’s secretary general, Naim Qassem, last night laid down conditions for the war to end, including Israel stopping attacks, displaced people being permitted to return to their homes, those detained over the last two years by Israel being released and the Israeli army withdrawing.

Across southern Lebanon, Khodr said Hezbollah was “still present in the area, trying to repel the Israeli army’s advance”, adding that Hezbollah’s aim was not just territorial control of the region, but preventing Israel from gaining new positions in the country.

The conflict was ignited on February 28 when US and Israeli forces assassinated Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in Tehran, prompting Hezbollah to launch rockets into northern Israel on March 2.

Israel has since killed more than 2,000 people across Iran and Lebanon in its attacks.

France’s special envoy for Lebanon ‌said on Wednesday that It ⁠would ⁠be unreasonable to expect Lebanon’s government to ⁠disarm Hezbollah while the country ⁠is being bombed by Israel,, adding that only a negotiation would resolve the crisis.

“Israel occupied Lebanon for ⁠a very long ⁠time and failed to eradicate Hezbollah’s military capacity. Therefore, ⁠they cannot now ask ⁠the Lebanese ⁠government to do that job in three days under ‌bombardment,” Jean-Yves Le Drian told France ‌Info ‌radio.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, a staunch Israeli ally, had also added his voice to growing international concern, warning that Israel’s ground offensive in Lebanon was an “error” that risked worsening what he described as an already dire humanitarian situation.

***

Shailok serial-killers continue their killings, with Wankee military equipment and supplies, all borne by Wankee taxpayers.

Director of the US National Counterterrorism Center resigned because Trump started the war against Iran on behalf of Israel

From the FB page of:

Occupy Democrats  ·

Follow

Sspodonrte824am5al6glm0177lm9cfc5t6acc60hu7hglu057hig0i91lf6 ·

BREAKING: Retired U.S. Army Brigadier General Steve Anderson gives Trump NIGHTMARE news after his top counterterrorism official resigned over the Iran War by predicting many more resignations to come.

The flood gates are about to burst...

"I think that this is absolutely significant," Anderson said of the departure of Joe Kent, the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center.

"I mean, think about the anguish that he went through to do this, to make this resignation," said Anderson. "This is an insider, this is a MAGA guy through and through. And this is a tremendous blow to President Trump. But it took an incredible amount of political courage for him to make the stand that he has made."

Kent announced his resignation earlier today in a letter to Trump in which he stated that he "cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran." He said that Iran "posed no imminent threat" to the United States and the war was started on behalf of Israel and "its powerful American lobby." He added that he "cannot support sending the next generation off to fight and die in a war that serves no benefit to the American people nor justifies the cost of American lives."

General Anderson made it clear that while he doesn't agree with Kent's broader politics since he's a part of MAGA, he respects his courage.

"I don't agree with his positions. I don't agree with a lot of things he's done in the background, but I respect him for his service to our nation, losing his wife as he did and for his ability to make a political stand here of the highest order," said Anderson. "I'm very, very proud that he has chosen to do this."

Kent is an Army Ranger combat veteran and a former CIA officer who lost his wife to a suicide bombing in Syria.

"And I hope that this leads to other resignations, because this war is not going well," continued Anderson. "It's only getting worse, and I think that Joe Kent, by recognizing that there was no imminent threat, in actually putting that in writing and resigning as he did, is a tremendous, tremendous blow to the Trump administration."

Let's hope that Anderson's wishes come to fruition. More Trump officials need to resign in protest because this war is an historic atrocity. Trump is mass murdering men, women, and children on behalf of a foreign nation in an illegal war that does nothing to make America safer or more prosperous. Remaining silent right now, or continuing to serve this president, constitutes a grave crime.

Please like and share to demand more resignations!

Even Dr M is welcome to rejoin Umno, says Ahmad Maslan

FMT:

Even Dr M is welcome to rejoin Umno, says Ahmad Maslan

The Umno Supreme Council member says the party is taking a ‘forgive and forget’ approach

Ahmad Maslan (left) said even if Dr Mahathir Mohamad were to submit an application, it would be deliberated by Umno’s Supreme Council.

PETALING JAYA: Umno is open to readmitting any former member who wishes to return to the party, including prominent figures like its former president Dr Mahathir Mohamad, says Supreme Council member Ahmad Maslan.

Ahmad said anyone could apply to rejoin Umno and its top leadership would consider all applications, adding that the party was taking a “forgive and forget” approach.

He said even if Mahathir were to submit an application, it would be deliberated by the Supreme Council, Harian Metro reported.


“Umno’s doors are always open. If there is an application, we will discuss it and make a collective decision,” he said when met at an iftar event with the public works department and the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) in Kuching.

He added that several categories of applicants are being considered for readmission, including those who faced disciplinary action, those who left voluntarily, and those seeking to join the party’s cause for the first time.

Mahathir joined Umno in the 1940s and became Kedah Umno chairman in 1959. He was sacked from the party by then prime minister Tunku Abdul Rahman, but later rejoined Umno and was elected as one of its vice-presidents in 1975. In 1981, he became the party’s president, a post he held for over 22 years.

In May 2008, he quit Umno in protest of the administration of his successor, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. He joined the party again before quitting for the second time in 2016 in protest of the administration of prime minister Najib Razak.

Mahathir then led Bersatu, Pejuang and the Gerakan Tanah Air coalition, before establishing a “Malay secretariat committee” in June 2025, in an effort to advocate for Malay interests under one “big umbrella”.

Earlier this month, Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the party’s doors were “unconditionally” open to former members, and that “all past mistakes and differences would be forgiven” in the spirit of Ramadan.

He said the Rumah Bangsa task force, chaired by party vice-president Khaled Nordin, would coordinate the re-entry process for former members wishing to return.

Ex-Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin has applied to rejoin the party, while former vice-president Hishammuddin Hussein has formally requested that his suspension be lifted.

***

He will if guaranteed the No 1 position for either himself or his son 😂😂😂 Dirgahayu Tun 👏👏👏

Trump declared total victory against Iran for the 10th time in 11 days

From the FB page of:

😂😂😂

Sodium Haze ·

Follow

Stndpoesro7hi 137a52MuMg0iaha182a6ilmlcf8i98cP ra0lmt8g :a1  ·

...and now an address from the President of The United States.

"Fellow Americans I am proud to update you on how we are totally winning this war in Iran against the 'deranged scumbags' that we must help towards democracy, freedom and the orderly transfer of oil reserves to Haliburton and Chevron.

We are winning in such a bigly way that I am here to declare total victory for the 10th time in 11 days - we have decimated Iran, killing 2,600 civilians, bombing primary schools, medical facilities and civilian infrastructure - it is now up to the Iranian people to overthrow their government in gratitude. We have done all we can.

We are in total control of the air, sea and land which is why our aircraft carriers have been able to tactically withdraw to Oman and the Red Sea, its a lot easier to operate a 1,000km from Iran and they can do nothing to stop us.

We can re-open the Strait of Hormuz whenever we want, which is why it remains closed. Not a single tanker has been hit near Hormuz because nobody goes through, which shows how safe it is.

Many nations are flocking to join my flotilla of peace that will unblock the Strait of Hormuz with zero ships pledged so far, I won't visit China if they don't send ships and I know they are very upset about that.

NATO says they won't send any ships and very bad things are going to happen to them if they don't do what I want, there is no point in a defensive alliance if they don't follow my orders and join all my totally legal and defensive wars. I am going to invade Canada and Greenland anyway after this totally legal defensive war is over because I have always said NATO is a one way street.

The price of oil is falling rapidly down to $106 a barrel from $100 and is set to fall further to $120 or even $200. The oil terminal of Fujairah is not an fire again as you can see from the picture below, all of these reports of Iranian missiles and drone strikes are just FAKE NEWS published by the hard left corrupt media...

...so we are going to withdraw broadcasting licences from media companies that don't act in the public interest, the public interest being whatever I say it is, further strengthening the American democracy that we must spread to other countries whether they want it or not.

Our glorious military will soon move on to more success in Cuba and my beautiful SAVE bill will help to set the result of future elections in advance, also in the public interest.

Pete Hegseth is recovering well after my lego model of the USS Gerald R Ford aircraft carrier and other toys hit him on the head, he really is a great guy.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!!!