Monday, October 05, 2026

A theory on why Malays accept corrupt leaders

 


A theory on why Malays accept corrupt leaders

A theory on why Malays accept corrupt leaders

Education, economy, religion and party sentiment are said to be among the factors influencing Malays’ attitudes towards corruption.

tajuddin

There is a question that many non-Malays often ask me, and recently even my wife has raised it: why are Najib Razak and Umno still embraced by Malays, from kampung folk to those with tertiary education?

This question resurfaced following Najib’s conditional pardon allowing for house arrest and Umno’s significant victories in Johor and Negeri Sembilan.

In this article, I present my theory. Readers may find the issue worthy of a research project, or even a PhD thesis!

Reason one: taxation

Many Malays pay little or no tax. For example, my two children, both university graduates, earn about RM4,000 per month and contribute only a few ringgit in taxes. I, on the other hand, pay a substantial amount in tax, but a high-earning non-Malay friend pays four times more than I do.

Because many Malays do not feel the weight of taxation, corruption involving public funds does not resonate with them. To them, money for the people comes from a Malay-led government. As long as salaries, festive aid and allowances arrive, they are content.

Reason two: government employment

A large proportion of Malays work in government. The civil service and political leadership are overwhelmingly Malay – about 80%. Salaries are paid every month, so even if corruption drains RM40 billion, Malay wages remain unaffected.

Advertisement
Advertisement

People may say the country is drowning in debt due to 1MDB, but salaries still come in. Why then should the Malays worry about corruption?

If salaries were withheld for even one month, Umno would collapse and Najib would be cursed. But as long as salaries and allowances flow, corruption has no impact.

Reason three: lack of awareness

Civil servants and Malay businessmen are rarely told that their wages and development allocations – roads, schools, infrastructure – are funded largely by taxes paid by non-Malays employed outside government.

The plundering of billions through corruption does not strike home because Malays do not feel the burden of national debt. Thus, corrupt leaders chosen by Malays borrow from external sources while siphoning off wealth that rightfully belongs to the people.

Reason four: Islamic education

Whether at school or university, this issue is never taught. Even Islamic education avoids it, focusing instead on moral issues like alcohol, gambling and pork.

There are three aspects of Islam that cause corruption to be accepted or ignored:

  • Religious education itself: I have reviewed thousands of Friday sermons, and none explains how tax money becomes salaries or development funds. Corruption is treated as a minor sin, distant and irrelevant to ordinary people.
  • Political sermons: Some religious teachers from political parties justify corruption, claiming it is not punishable under hudud because it is absent from classical fiqh texts. So, stealing RM200 shoes may warrant amputation but embezzling RM40 billion is not mentioned. As a result, corruption is seen as less serious than drinking alcohol, not wearing the headscarf, or failing to vote for an Islamic party.
  • Preachers from abroad: Some insist that Muslims must vote for Muslim candidates, even if they are weak or immoral, as long as they are Muslim. This is compounded by political parties promising heaven for those who vote for them. Thus, corruption, slander and insults will be tolerated if the party claims to uphold Islam in politics.

Reason five: party benefits

Malays receive benefits – haj trips, kitchen aid, bicycles – from Malay parties. No one ever asks where the money comes from.

At restaurants, Malays check for halal certificates, but when receiving party contributions, they never question the source of funds.

Reason six: the DAP bogeyman

This is the most classic and effective reason: vote for Malay or Islamic parties to prevent DAP from ruling. My wife’s retiree friends recently admitted voting for Umno out of fear that DAP would take over in Johor and Negeri Sembilan.

Malays have never compared the number of DAP members convicted of corruption against Malays from Malay parties.

All they care about is blocking DAP from coming to power because it is a party of infidels. Malays believe it is their religious duty as Muslims to prevent DAP from winning, and in doing so, they feel assured of heaven.

With no proper education at schools, universities or mosques about the impact of corruption, Malays will continue to support parties steeped in it.

I believe that until the end of time, Malays will not change but will go on backing corrupt parties in Malaysia.

DAP dares PAS to state stand on Negeri Sembilan crisis

 


DAP dares PAS to state stand on Negeri Sembilan crisis

DAP dares PAS to state stand on Negeri Sembilan crisis

DAP vice-chairman Syahredzan Johan says Malaysians want to know the extent of PAS's involvement in the Negeri Sembilan crisis.

Syahredzan Johan Ahmad Fadhli Shaari
DAP vice-chairman Syahredzan Johan (left) asked PAS information chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari whether the Islamic party plans to challenge the sacking of the Negeri Sembilan exco members in court.
PETALING JAYA:
DAP vice-chairman Syahredzan Johan has challenged PAS to state its stand on the Negeri Sembilan constitutional crisis.

Syahredzan questioned whether the party’s central leadership endorsed the menteri besar and the former executive council’s attempt to remove Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir as Yang Dipertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan.

In a statement, he pointed out that one of the exco members whose appointments the ruler revoked was from PAS.

“What is PAS’s stand on the decision made by the Yang Dipertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan? Don’t be evasive or only drop hints. State PAS’s stand clearly about what has happened to their assemblyman.

“More importantly, Malaysians want to know the extent of PAS’s involvement in the Negeri Sembilan crisis,” he said, adding that DAP and Pakatan Harapan’s stand on the crisis was clear.

The Bangi MP was responding to PAS information chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari, who earlier questioned whether DAP would accept having exco members in other states being removed from their posts by the ruler without the state government’s approval.

Fadhli said the constitutions of other states also outline that exco members hold their posts “at the pleasure” of the ruler.

Syahredzan asked Fadhli whether PAS plans to take legal action to challenge Tuanku Muhriz’s decision to sack the Negeri Sembilan exco members since the PAS leader appeared to oppose the ruler’s decision.

The Negeri Sembilan royal crisis was sparked in April by a proclamation by four “undangs”, some of whose positions are under dispute, purporting to remove Tuanku Muhriz as ruler.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Last month, the Negeri Sembilan exco issued a statement claiming that the ruler’s removal was legitimate, with menteri besar Ismail Lasim endorsing the statement a day later.

This is despite Ismail stating support for Tuanku Muhriz to remain as Yang Dipertuan Besar in August.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers and the state’s royal court, known as Dewan Keadilan dan Undang, later said the exco’s statement had no legal effect and that Tuanku Muhriz remained the rightful ruler.

The 10 Negeri Sembilan exco members were sacked by Tuanku Muhriz as a result, with the palace saying their appointments were “at the pleasure of the ruler” according to the state constitution.