Sunday, November 08, 2026

The world needs boring





The world needs boring




Saturday, 07 Nov 2026 | 10:09 PM MYT



Texas, South Carolina, Kansas - sometimes, three names tell you more than a thousand statistics.

Republican citadels have sent Democrats to the United States Senate. The party that returned Donald Trump to the White House two years ago has suffered a repudiation extending far beyond the familiar battlegrounds.


This blue tsunami has breached territory Republicans had treated almost as an inheritance.

The political map has sustained an earthquake and its consequences will travel well beyond America.

Democrats have captured both chambers of Congress. American midterms routinely punish the president’s party, but this result belongs among the exceptional reversals. As the Associated Press notes, since the Second World War, both chambers had changed hands together in the same midterm only in 1946, 1994 and 2006. There are historical parallels but not many.

The pollsters have some explaining to do again. Many correctly identified the direction of travel; some late surveys captured the surge. Yet polls still underestimated the scale of the Democratic victory in important contests. The distinction matters. Foreseeing Republican losses and measuring this demolition are different achievements.

After elections in which Trump’s strength was underestimated, the surprise has come from the other direction. Yesterday’s polling error offers no guarantee about tomorrow’s.

For Republicans, the central problem is Trump. Candidate quality and local grievances matter, but a defeat spanning such different states demands a national explanation. He made the party his instrument. He cannot plausibly disclaim responsibility when voters reject the music.

Trump may blame candidates, disloyal colleagues or insufficient enthusiasm. It is difficult to believe he does not understand the verdict. A president so attentive to winning will recognise what losing on this scale means, however loudly he insists otherwise.

There is a warning here for every leader with dictatorial tendencies: electoral victory does not confer ownership of a country. Public office comes with limits, obligations and an expiry date. Treating institutions as personal possessions eventually invites resistance from people who might otherwise support your politics.

The American constitutional tradition begins with suspicion of concentrated power. Its practice has often betrayed its promise, and American history abroad hardly supports claims of consistent opposition to imperialism. Nevertheless, the domestic principle remains powerful: a president is not a king. Conservatives have as much reason as liberals to defend it.

Republican voters helped deliver that rebuke. In Texas, the AP Voter Poll found that about one in ten Republicans backed Democrat James Talarico for the Senate. That is evidence of crossover support, although turnout and independent voters also matter. These voters did not have to abandon conservatism to decide their party had lost its way. No party should assume habitual supporters will indefinitely excuse conduct they would condemn in an opponent. Loyalty has limits. Trump, and anyone tempted to imitate him, should absorb that lesson.

Republicans themselves now face a test of seriousness. They can spend two years explaining away this defeat or recover the capacity to disagree with their leader. A party that cannot correct itself leaves correction entirely to the electorate. These results show how expensive that arrangement can become, even in places where defeat once seemed almost unimaginable.

Much of the world will breathe more easily. European reactions already combine relief with concern about what divided government will bring. That caution is justified. The election has checked Trump politically; it has not removed him from office or transferred American foreign policy to the Democrats.

Europe, China, India and the Middle East must therefore resist premature celebration. A wounded president can remain a powerful president. Frustration at home could encourage him to seek dramatic victories abroad, where executive authority gives him considerable room to act. Foreign governments should prepare for that possibility without assuming it is inevitable.

Europe needs dependable security commitments and workable trade relations. China needs to calculate whether confrontation with Washington will intensify or ease. India needs space to pursue its interests without every negotiation becoming a public loyalty test. The Middle East needs sustained diplomacy, restraint and follow through. None benefits from American policy becoming an outlet for presidential resentment.

Nor does the wider world benefit if Washington locks itself into another exhausting cycle of investigation, retaliation and paralysis.

Democrats face a consequential choice. After their 2018 House victory, confrontation with Trump became a defining feature of Washington, culminating in his first impeachment in 2019. There were serious constitutional issues at stake. Accountability cannot simply be dismissed as partisan mischief. But the political danger is allowing the next two years to become another television series with Trump permanently in the starring role.

Congress must investigate credible wrongdoing, defend lawful limits and protect public money. It must also legislate. Voters who have lent Democrats their support deserve more than the satisfaction of watching committee hearings. They need evidence that changing their vote can improve their lives.

That means concentrating on household costs, access to healthcare, housing, reliable public services and opportunities for their children. Congressional majorities cannot accomplish everything while an opposing president retains his veto. Democrats should make practical proposals, negotiate where progress is possible and explain clearly when the White House blocks them. They can establish priorities even when they cannot dictate outcomes.

There is political strength in that discipline. A family struggling with bills will judge politics differently from a strategist counting viral clips. Useful compromises can outlast triumphant speeches. Competence becomes persuasive when people experience it rather than merely hear it advertised.

If Democrats translate this breakthrough into tangible benefits, they can build a credible route to the presidency in 2028. Nothing about a midterm landslide guarantees that outcome. Voters can reject Republicans without embracing every Democratic prescription. Borrowed support must be earned again.

The opportunity, however, is considerable: a new generation of Democratic leadership could move American politics beyond the long shadow of Trump and Joe Biden. Age alone guarantees neither wisdom nor renewal. The next standard bearer must offer judgment, energy and an ability to govern a divided country. A younger face repeating familiar failures would accomplish little.

The international opportunity is equally important. We need to restore habits of cooperation suited to a multipolar world. America remains indispensable, but other countries have interests, agency and dignity. Durable arrangements require negotiation among them. They cannot depend on one leader’s mood or on everyone else performing gratitude before a camera.

A multipolar order also needs rules. Otherwise, it becomes permission for several powerful states to bully their neighbours instead of one. Respect for sovereignty, credible institutions and commitments that survive a change of government matter particularly to smaller countries, which cannot purchase security through sheer weight.

Climate change, debt, displacement, technological disruption and the danger of war demand patient work. They require leaders who listen, explain their choices and carry out their promises. Grandstanding consumes attention that should be spent solving problems.

This election offers a welcome reminder that citizens can still impose limits on leaders who mistake applause for consent. Its promise will be fulfilled through what follows: steadier government, material improvement and a less combustible international order.

After so much spectacle, the world needs boring. Leaders who arrive prepared, honour agreements and leave institutions stronger would be a welcome change. Let the drama belong to election night. Let the work begin.


Umno ‘terer’ kutip RM50 juta

 


Umno ‘terer’ kutip RM50 juta

Umno ‘terer’ kutip RM50 juta

Umno 'terer'. 'Power'. Orang lain terkial-kial cari dana untuk capai sasaran jauh yang lebih kurang daripada jumlah yang Umno kumpulkan dengan mudah.

Mohsin Abdullah

Saya angkat songkok kepada Umno sambil ucap tahniah dan syabas kerana berjaya kutip RM50 juta dengan cepat dan pantas bagi membolehkan bekas presiden Najib Razak menjalani baki hukuman penjara di rumah.

Kita tentu masih ingat Umno mula pungut wang September lalu. Semalam RM50 juta sudah dapat dikumpulkan. Kurang tiga bulan. Satu pencapaian menakjubkan.

Itu sebab saya kata Umno ‘terer’. Power. Orang lain terkial-kial cari dana untuk capai sasaran jauh yang lebih kurang daripada jumlah yang Umno kumpulkan dengan mudah. Misalnya, ada banyak NGO bertungkus-lumus cari sumbangan orang ramai dan syarikat untuk umpamanya membiayai pembedahan jantung kanak-kanak. Media juga diminta membantu untuk menghebahkan usaha mereka supaya matlamat tercapai. Usaha itu mungkin membuahkan hasil tetapi ada kala mengambil masa berbulan-bulan atau lebih lama.

Tetapi Umno dapat pungut RM50 juta bagai sekelip mata, menyebabkan saya angkat songkok dengan penuh rasa kagum. Saya cadang NGO minta pertolongan Umno lain kali mahu cari dana untuk biaya rawatan pesakit yang tidak berkemampuan, atau belajar daripada Umno rahsia memungut wang dengan pantas.

To put things in context, kita imbau kembali. Najib dipenjarakan pada Ogos 2022 selepas Mahkamah Persekutuan mengekalkan sabitan atas kesalahan menyalahguna kuasa, pecah amanah dan pengubahan wang haram membabitkan dana RM42 juta milik SRC International. Beliau dihukum penjara 12 tahun dan denda RM210 juta.

Pun begitu pada Januari 2024, Yang di-Pertuan Agong ketika itu Al-Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah mengurangkan separuh hukuman itu dan menurunkan jumlah denda kepada RM50 juta menerusi pengampunan diraja. Pada September lalu, Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim memberikan Najib pengampunan bersyarat yang membolehkan dia menjalani baki hukuman di bawah tahanan rumah sehingga 23 Ogos 2028.

Tetapi tahanan di rumah hanya boleh dilaksanakan jika Najib bayar denda RM50 juta serta pematuhan syarat-syarat lain yang ditetapkan. Syarat-syarat itu membabitkan urusan pemenjaraan. Yang paling utama ialah Najib mesti bayar RM50 juta, barulah boleh nikmati tahanan di rumah, di kediaman yang terletak di kawasan elit di ibu negara.

Berikutan itu, Umno lancar Tabung Solidariti Najib Razak pada 18 Sept lalu, tujuannya untuk kumpul RM50 juta. Menurut Setiausaha Agung Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki, setakat Ogos lalu, Wanita Umno ada 1,412,052 ahli. Pemuda Umno ada 418,062 ahli. Puteri Umno pula 226,076 ahli. Jadi jumlah keseluruhan ahli Umno ialah 3,251,456 orang.

Saya tidak tahu sama ada si setiausaha agung Umno ada ambil kira jumlah ahli yang tinggalkan parti. Lazimnya orang yang keluar parti akan angkat kaki begitu sahaja. Mereka tidak akan maklumkan kepada ibu pejabat Umno. Saya merujuk kepada ahli biasa yang tak terkenal.

Tidak usah pertikai jumlah ahli Umno yang diumumkan si setiausaha agung parti. Take it as it is, ertinya ada tiga juta lebih ahli. Senang cerita genapkan kepada empat juta ahli Umno maka jika setiap ahli sumbang RM1 untuk tabung Najib, dapat kumpul RM4 juta sahaja. Bagaimanapun takkanlah mereka sumbang RM1 sahaja — mungkin ada yang sumbang RM50, RM100 atau RM1,000. Tentu ada yang beri lebih daripada itu.

Teringat saya laporan media 21 Sept lalu yang memetik isteri Najib, Rosmah Mansor, menzahirkan rasa terharu kerana rakan-rakan dari Singapura, Brunei, Itali dan Kanada menghulur sumbangan untuk bantu Najib. Mungkin jumlah yang dinyatakan Rosmah itu disalurkan kepada tabung anjuran Umno.

Sememangnya RM50 juta itu satu jumlah besar. Semalam Asyraf dengan bangga dan gembira mengumumkan partinya sudah berjaya kumpul dana mencukupi menerusi kempen sumbangan untuk Najib, dan Umno sudah menjelaskan denda RM50 juta untuk Najib.

“Kami ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada ahli-ahli dan orang ramai atas sumbangan mereka,” kata Asyraf menerusi kenyataan.

Muncul bekas Ahli Parlimen Damansara Tony Pua menggesa pihak berkuasa mengaudit sumbangan yang dikutip. Kata beliau, audit oleh Bank Negara dan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia penting bagi memastikan dana yang dikumpulkan diperoleh secara sah dan bukan hasil pengubahan wang haram. Saya setuju.

Dalam pada itu, Pua berpendapat adalah lebih elok jika wang yang Umno kumpul digunakan untuk bantu rakyat biasa. Memang betul tetapi jelas Umno has its own priorities.

A Lost European?

 



Selective outrage of our race-and-religion politicians





Selective outrage of our race-and-religion politicians

Saturday, 07 Nov 2026 | 1:49 PM MYT


Many here are celebrating the victories by some Muslim candidates in the US mid-term elections, but the results are more than about those few wins – they are about inclusivity, diversity and shared power.

IT'S twisted logic, really. There is something rather amusing, even ironic, about the way some of our politicians are reacting to the US mid-term elections.


When it comes to Malaysian politics, some are quick to invoke race and religion, insisting that these are the most important considerations when deciding who should lead the country.

One particular party leader has even said that is better to vote for a corrupt Muslim leader than an honest non-Muslim one.





They have built much of their political messaging around racial identity, religious affiliation and the need to protect particular communities.

Yet, when the results of the recent US midterm elections came in, some of these same politicians were quick to celebrate the victory of Muslim candidates. Suddenly, the message was about representation, diversity and the breaking of barriers.

There was much enthusiasm over Abdul El-Sayed becoming the first Muslim elected to the US Senate.


It was certainly a historic achievement, and there is every reason to acknowledge the significance of his victory.

But why stop there? The Nov 3 elections produced a remarkable list of historic firsts.

They saw women, African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans and members of the LGBTQ community elected to important positions.

Among them was Chris Pappas, who became the first openly gay man elected to the US Senate. Deb Haaland became the first Native American woman elected governor of a state.

Keisha Lance Bottoms became the first Black woman to occupy the governor's office in Georgia.

Gina Hinojosa made history as Texas' first Latina governor, while Peggy Flanagan became the first Native American woman elected to the US Senate.

These were not insignificant achievements. They represent a broadening of political representation in a country that has long struggled with questions of race, identity and equal opportunity.

Yet, one wonders whether our politicians who were so enthusiastic about the Muslim victories would be equally generous in acknowledging the achievements of these other candidates.

Why celebrate one identity while conveniently overlooking others?

The irony becomes even more apparent when we consider that these victories were not confined to one political party.

Florida elected Republican Byron Donalds as its first Black governor, while other historic breakthroughs came from Democratic candidates.

The American electorate, whatever its political divisions, has demonstrated that voters can choose candidates from different backgrounds and identities based on a much wider range of considerations.

It would not be wrong to assume many American voters were simply fed up of President Donald Trump's war cry and religious chest-thumping - in this case, the White Christian narrative.

Of course, nobody should suggest that Malaysia can simply transplant the American political system into our own.

Our history, constitutional arrangements, demographics and political realities are different.

But there are lessons worth considering.

The American elections showed that a candidate's religion, race, gender or sexual orientation need not automatically disqualify that person from seeking the highest public office.

Voters are also capable of looking beyond identity to examine a candidate's policies, leadership, experience and ability to serve the wider population.

That is the distinction our politicians should understand.

In Malaysia, we have too often witnessed political narratives that encourage communities to view one another with suspicion. Race and religion are repeatedly brought into political conversations, sometimes at the expense of more pressing national concerns such as the cost of living, education, employment, corruption and economic opportunities.

Our politicians cannot have it both ways.

They cannot champion religious representation when it suits their political narrative abroad, but question the legitimacy or suitability of people from other backgrounds when discussing leadership at home.

If the election of a Muslim senator in America is celebrated as a victory for inclusion, then surely the election of a woman, a Black politician, a Latino, a Native American or an openly gay politician should also be recognised as part of the same democratic principle.

Representation should not be a selective celebration.

There is also an important distinction between respecting someone's religious identity and expecting political leaders to govern primarily along religious lines. A Muslim politician in America is elected to represent all constituents, not Muslims alone.

The same applies to a Christian, Jew, Hindu or a politician of no religious faith. That is what public service is supposed to mean.

Malaysia, with its multiracial and multireligious population, has much to gain from a political culture that puts the interests of the nation above narrow communal considerations.

We should be asking whether our leaders can bring people together, rather than constantly reminding us of the differences that separate us.

Perhaps our politicians should look at the US results more closely. Not just at the Muslim victories that they were so eager to celebrate, but at the entire picture.

The message from the ballot box was much bigger than religion.

It was about the right of people from different backgrounds to participate in democracy and be judged as individuals.

If we can applaud that principle in America, why should it be so difficult to practise it in Malaysia?

Unity cannot be celebrated selectively, and diversity cannot be embraced only when it suits our political convenience.

That is a lesson worth bringing home. Malaysia belongs to Malaysians of all faiths and races.

Heavy rains leave tens of thousands without shelter in Gaza

 


Heavy rains leave tens of thousands without shelter in Gaza

Heavy rains leave tens of thousands without shelter in Gaza

Rainwater is inundating tents sheltering displaced people, and collapsing walls and roofs have caused injuries.

Displaced Palestinians travel on animal-drawn carts through a flooded street following heavy rainfall in Khan Younis. (EPA Images pic)
GAZA CITY:
Heavy rain on Saturday flooded tens of thousands of displaced people’s tents in war-devastated Gaza, Palestinian authorities said, leaving them without shelter.

In a statement, the Hamas-run government media office said that about “70,000 tents sheltering tens of thousands of displaced people were flooded on the first day” of rains.

It also noted the “collapse of dozens of cracked walls and roofs, which caused injuries”, some critical, in various areas of the tiny territory.

Since early Saturday, hundreds of displaced families have been seen fleeing camps in parts of Gaza City and in the central and northern areas of the territory after they were inundated by rainwater.

Civil defence spokesman Mahmoud Bassal told AFP his teams had received more than 1,500 calls during the night from residents requesting urgent assistance after their tents were flooded, explaining that the agency “is operating without any equipment or capabilities”.

“We have issued an urgent distress call to the international community and humanitarian organisations to intervene immediately to save hundreds of thousands of displaced people from the flooding of their tents.”

“We cannot face the consequences of this storm on our own.”

Um Muhammad al-Hersh, 45, who lives with her family in a tent in western Gaza, told AFP: “We were not able to save the mattresses, and all the clothes were soaked. Our suffering is repeated every winter.”

Maryam Odeh, 34, who lives with her children in Deir el-Balah, said, “We no longer know how to protect our children. My children ask me where we will sleep tonight, and I have no answer”.

For his part, Khaled al-Najjar, 41, said, “We fear for our children not only from the flooding of the tents, but also from the cold and the widespread diseases”.

‘Catastrophe’

A coalition of Palestinian civil society organisations warned in a statement of “the catastrophe that has come to threaten the lives of hundreds of thousands of residents”, pointing to the risk of the spread of diseases and epidemics.

The coalition, which includes dozens of local institutions and organisations, called for “pressure on Israel to allow the entry of humanitarian aid without restrictions”.

The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority on Saturday called on the international community to take immediate action, saying that Israel’s war in Gaza had exacerbated dire living conditions there, according to Palestinian official news agency WAFA.

A fragile ceasefire came into effect on Oct 10, 2025, after two years of war that erupted following the unprecedented attack carried out by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023.

Despite the ceasefire agreement reached with Egyptian, Qatari, and American mediation, the Israeli army continues airstrikes and ground operations on an almost daily basis.

Mustafa Qazzaat, a member of the Gaza city council and an official in the Strip’s emergency committee, said Israel has not allowed prefabricated homes to shelter the displaced in Gaza since the truce was announced, and has only permitted the entry of limited numbers of tents.

Qazzaat told AFP on Saturday that Gaza “needs 200,000 prefabricated homes urgently, in addition to the entry of heavy machinery to remove the rubble of destroyed homes and buildings, open main roads, and urgently provide electricity and heating”.