Monday, August 31, 2026

POKKAI LIAO LAH

 


From his FB page:πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚




US military rampas minyak Venezuela - a la lanun


From the FB page of:


BREAKING NEWS: The United States has taken control of a substantial portion of Venezuela’s oil reserves, it said yesterday.
“The United States of America has just entered into an Agreement with the Country of Venezuela on, THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY!” Trump wrote in a social media post.
Details of the deal were not released—other than the fact that it involved Washington taking majority control over more than 65 billion barrels in 17 strategic oil fields. Fuel will be extracted by private US businesses in conjunction with the US government.
The US maintains that Venezuela’s oil fields were “stolen” from the United States.
.
‘OUR HEMISPHERE’
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the “win” had the effect of “securing stable reserves and low-cost oil in our Hemisphere and lowering gas prices here at home”.
(The “our Hemisphere” reference reiterates the US claims over the whole of the Americas, including the South American countries and Canada.)
.
OIL FIELDS 'STOLEN' PROPERTY
Trump claims the Venezuelan oil fields were “stolen” from the United States, after Americans were among early fuel explorers there.
Venezuela nationalized its oil industry to share profits with its people—an event Trump adviser Stephen Miller said was “the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property”.
However, under international law, resources identified in a country by visitors are the property of the country, not the visitors.
But nothing about US activities in the south American country has been legal. “Experts have denounced US intervention in Venezuela as illegal under international law,” Al-Jazeera reported earlier today.
.
ANALYSTS DOUBTFUL ABOUT EASY PROFITS
Still, this may not be the easy oil-grab that it appears to be, analysts say.
The assertions that Venezuela has “the world’s largest proven oil field” and “more oil than Saudi Arabia” are often made in the western mainstream media but are considered doubtful by many oil analysts.
Furthermore, Venezuelan oil is unusually thick and difficult to process, which is one of the reasons why the country has remained poor—the other being a huge raft of sanctions and political interventions by the US.
.
U.S. SWITCHED LEADERS
The oil field deal has been signed off to the US by Venezuela’s interim President Delcy Rodriguez, the White House said.
The original US plan was to claim that Washington-allied politician MarΓ­a Corina Machado was the most popular politician in the country and place her in the top job.
But the US revised the scheme, discarded her as “unpopular”, and chose to put Washington loyalist Rodriguez in the decision-makers' chair.
.
VENEZUELA ATTACK CHARGED TO THE COUNTRY
The US made Venezuela pay for the US attack on its territory, President Trump told a rally in Las Vegas last month.
The assault, in which 200 people were killed, and President NicolΓ‘s Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores abducted, was paid for “with what we’ve taken out” from the country, Trump said.
“That’s the old-fashioned way, right? The old-fashioned way. To the victor belong the spoils, right?”
The US disregards international law and its military operates as a pirate body, many analysts and commentators have said—including Trump himself, who agreed, describing US forces as being “like pirates” in April this year.
.
.
See less
Imagine the outrage if China or Russia did the same to another country.
  • Reply
  • Gerald Sy if that were ever happened … it would be for certain that the elimination of the 5K years civilization by nukes as what they want to do to the other oldest 5K civilization…




    Three Prime Ministers, One Courthouse: A Day of Infamy

     

    Dennis Ignatius

     

    ~ Provoking discussion, dissent & debate on politics, diplomacy, human rights & civil society.

    Three Prime Ministers, One Courthouse: A Day of Infamy

    Tags

    , , , ,



    [1] There are days that force a nation to look in the mirror and confront what it has become. August 27 was such a day. At the Kuala Lumpur Court Complex, three men who once held the highest office in the land — Najib Razak, Muhyiddin Yassin and Ismail Sabri Yaakob — passed through the same doors within hours of one another. Najib returned for the civil suit seeking to recover billions looted from 1MDB. Muhyiddin’s graft trial over the Jana Wibawa programme ground on. Ismail Sabri arrived to be charged over undeclared assets — cash, foreign currencies and gold bars. It was a story that quickly went viral and perhaps global.

    [2] We should feel the shame of it. A day of infamy. But shame is not enough. We must stop, take stock, and face a difficult truth: corruption has long ceased to be an aberration; it is a culture that has engulfed the nation and reaches to the very summit of power.

    [3] We did not arrive here by accident; it is the result of institutional and personal failures. Too many who held power at different levels failed to do their duty — or quietly profited while the rot spread. All too many were appallingly dishonest and horribly corrupt. None in the cabinet had the courage or the moral conviction to demand accountability; they either kept their silence or publicly defended corrupt leaders for the sake of political or personal expediency. Silence, in the face of criminality and abuse of power, is not neutrality. It is complicity.

    [4] When it became clear that something was badly amiss at Tabung Haji — the sacred savings of ordinary pilgrims — many of the same voices did not demand accountability. They reached instead for their oldest weapon, recasting legitimate scrutiny as an attack on Malay-Muslims, an attempt to shame the community. It is a squalid manoeuvre, used again and again: whenever the powerful are cornered, race and religion are summoned to shield them.

    [5] That is why this moment carries a weight beyond the courtroom. Many whose hands are soiled with corruption, and who have shown not a shred of integrity, are now manoeuvring for a return to power. Once again they wrap themselves in the cloak of race and religion, as though piety and ethnic loyalty could launder a record of plunder. 

    [6] This must be a defining moment — the point at which we finally say: enough. Enough of corrupt, dishonourable and failed figures. Enough of the racial and religious theatre deployed to distract from the looting. Enough of rewarding, election after election, the very people who betrayed our trust.

    [7] Three former prime ministers stood in the dock that day. Let that image not merely embarrass us; let it instruct us. The courts will deal with the guilt of individuals — but only the voters can deliver the larger verdict. And that verdict comes down to a single, stark choice: do we gamble on something new and untested, or return once more to the same tainted parties?

    [8] It is heartening to see Pakatan Harapan find its wings again, pursuing those once thought untouchable with a resolve many had despaired of ever seeing. Yet in almost the same breath it speaks of working with other parties, of alliances and accommodations still to be struck. And there lies the danger: that the old reflex of compromise reasserts itself, and principle is once again traded away for the arithmetic of power.

    [9] Many feel we need a fresh start, a clean break from the past. It’s foolish to expect political parties with a history of corruption, compromise and identity politics to deliver anything different. It might well come down to a choice between experienced but corrupt and compromised parties and fresh but untested ones.

    [10] Inexperience is a curable failing; entrenched corruption is not. As Zohran Mamdani told the disgraced former New York governor Andrew Cuomo: “What I don’t have in experience I make up for in integrity. And what you don’t have in integrity you can never make up for in experience.” A nation gets the leaders it is willing to tolerate. It is time we tolerated far less — and demanded far more.

    Dennis Ignatius | Kuala Lumpur | 28 August 2026