Monday, November 02, 2026

Can DAP's Kerk hold Ayer Keroh as 'Malay unity' faces Gerakan test?








Can DAP's Kerk hold Ayer Keroh as 'Malay unity' faces Gerakan test?

Published: Oct 30, 2026 8:00 PM


The battle for Ayer Keroh, a traditional DAP stronghold, will be an important test as Malacca voters head to the polls on Nov 14. The question is whether Malay voters, particularly Umno and PAS supporters, are prepared to vote for Gerakan.

For Gerakan, which has languished in the political wilderness for years, wresting the seat from DAP after 18 years would be a major coup. It would give the party a much-needed victory against detractors who have long written it off as a spent force in Malaysian politics.

Although Ayer Keroh is considered a DAP citadel, incumbent Kerk Chee Yee faces a potentially difficult fight. Yet, the crowded contest could also offer him an unexpected lifeline.

Before the dissolution of the state legislative assembly, Pakatan Harapan held just five seats in Malacca – four through DAP and one through Amanah.


With the Umno-PAS alliance emerging as a formidable electoral challenge, three constituencies have become critical battlegrounds: Amanah's Bukit Katil and DAP's Ayer Keroh and Kesidang. These are seats Harapan will be desperate to defend.

The stakes are particularly high given Ayer Keroh's voter demographics. Based on 2022 general election figures, Chinese voters make up 47.6 percent of the electorate, Malays 42.4 percent, and Indians 8.3 percent.



In the previous three-cornered contest, the combined BN and Perikatan Nasional votes were insufficient to unseat Kerk.

But the political landscape has since shifted. Recent election results in Johor and Negeri Sembilan have demonstrated how Umno-PAS cooperation can produce a "one plus one is greater than two" effect, with both parties benefiting from working together.


If the partnership succeeds in consolidating Malay support while Chinese voter turnout dips, Harapan could find itself squeezed from both sides.

Bersama's entry adds another layer of uncertainty.

Kerk himself has acknowledged that Ayer Keroh is a high-risk constituency, underlining the challenge of defending one of DAP's traditional strongholds.


"Right now, looking at the data, we are trailing by 2,000 votes in Ayer Keroh.

Ayer Keroh, Malacca

"And this hasn't factored in whether there are other political parties - including Bersama, which announced it will contest in Ayer Keroh," said Kerk, son of the late Kerk Kim Hock, DAP's fourth secretary-general.


MCA's unfinished business

However, this assessment hinges on one crucial assumption: that Malay voters will rally behind PN's candidate. The latest candidate announcements have complicated that equation.

Ayer Keroh was an MCA stronghold for three consecutive terms before DAP wrested it in 2008, when Khoo Poay Tiong was elected. A decade later, Khoo handed over the baton to Kerk, who retained the seat in 2021.

Reclaiming Ayer Keroh has remained unfinished business for MCA.

The party had hoped the Umno-PAS partnership would provide the momentum to wrest the constituency from DAP. But when BN unveiled its candidates on Oct 24, Ayer Keroh was conspicuously absent.

In a surprising turn, MCA found itself competing with its own coalition partners for the right to contest a seat it had hoped to reclaim. After protesting, the party eventually accepted the arrangement, with Ayer Keroh allocated to PN.


Can Gerakan win Malay voters?

That raised another question: who would PN field?

Given the emphasis on consolidating Malay support, speculation centred on whether it would nominate a Malay candidate from PAS or Wawasan Negara.

PN, however, had another surprise up its sleeve. It named Malacca Gerakan chairperson Gan Peng Lam, who also contested Ayer Keroh in the previous election.

In that election, Gan polled 2,479 votes, or about 16 percent, against Kerk's 9,459, nearly 60 percent.

Malacca Gerakan chairperson Gan Peng Lam


On those figures alone, Gan faces a formidable challenge.

But this time, he is banking on a different equation. Beyond Gerakan's traditional support base and PN voters, he will also be looking to attract voters left without a BN candidate after the coalition decided to sit out the contest.

The stakes are particularly high for Gerakan, which currently holds just one state assembly seat and no parliamentary seats. Winning Ayer Keroh would double its state representation, adding to its rare electoral success in Kulim, Kedah, in 2023.

But will BN's votes actually transfer to Gan? Will Umno supporters back a Gerakan candidate in the name of "Malay unity"? And will MCA's grassroots be willing to campaign for the party that has effectively denied it a chance to contest the seat?

The arithmetic is further complicated by PAS supporters, who may not necessarily be inclined to vote for a Gerakan candidate either.

Gan also faces a more fundamental challenge. If some Malay voters are reluctant to support a non-Malay candidate, where will their votes go?


Bersatu's entry complicates the equation

The third twist, in the form of Bersatu, may offer an answer.

On the night of Oct 29, Bersatu announced it would contest eight seats, four overlapping with Harapan constituencies. One is Ayer Keroh, where it is fielding Hamnaim Mohamad.

This does not mean Malay voters will necessarily vote along ethnic lines. But Bersatu's entry gives those uncomfortable with voting for Gerakan another option, adding yet another variable to an already crowded contest.

Perhaps the most intriguing twist, however, lies beyond Malacca.

Just hours before Bersatu announced its candidates, six MPs from the party aligned with president Muhyiddin Yassin signed a confidence and supply agreement (CSA), pledging support for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's government and the 2027 Budget.

Bersatu MPs and other lawmakers signed an agreement to support Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's government


While extending a lifeline to Harapan in Putrajaya, Bersatu is preparing to challenge it at the state level. It is a curious political arrangement.

For Kerk, however, this may not necessarily be bad news.

If Malay voters aligned with Umno-PAS are unwilling to back Gerakan and instead turn to Bersatu, the Malay support BN and PN hope to consolidate could end up divided, upsetting their electoral calculations.

But the equation cuts both ways. Bersatu could also attract disillusioned Harapan supporters looking for an alternative.

The question, therefore, is not simply whether Bersatu will split the Malay vote, but which side stands to lose more. At the very least, its entry challenges the assumption that Malay votes will naturally gravitate towards Gan.

That said, another candidate on the ballot does not automatically translate into a substantial following. Bersatu's performance in the Johor and Negeri Sembilan state elections was lacklustre, raising questions about its ability to make significant inroads in Malacca.


Mixed views on Kerk's performance

Earlier this week, Malaysiakini visited Ayer Keroh to speak to residents about the impending contest. One conversation offered an interesting glimpse into the electoral mood.

Yazid Haris, a 64-year-old vendor and voter, had positive things to say about Kerk's performance, describing him as a good assemblyperson.

But when asked whom he would vote for this time, Yazid replied: "BN."

The catch? BN is not contesting Ayer Keroh.

Vendor Yazid Haris


To be fair, PN had yet to announce its candidate when we spoke to Yazid. It would therefore be premature to assume his preference for BN would automatically translate into support for Gerakan.

Still, his response highlights an important distinction: appreciating an incumbent's performance does not necessarily mean voting for him.

With BN not fielding a candidate there, the question is how Malay voters like Yazid will respond.

Malaysiakini also spoke to dozens of residents from different racial backgrounds to gauge Kerk's standing among his constituents.

The responses were mixed. Some recognised him or recalled seeing him around the neighbourhood, describing him as an active assemblyperson who regularly visits the community and lends a helping hand.

Others were more measured, rating his performance as satisfactory, while a few complained that issues brought to his attention remained unresolved.

Despite these differing assessments, most Chinese voters interviewed said they would continue supporting DAP, primarily to keep PAS out of the state assembly.

One particularly interesting encounter was with Nur Suhana, an 18-year-old student who initially struggled to recall Kerk's name. However, she remembered seeing him distributing aid and engaging with young people, describing him as approachable.

Student Nur Suhana

As a first-time voter, Suhana has yet to decide whom to support.

These observations are based on a limited number of interviews and should not be taken as representative of the constituency as a whole.


Could Bersama eat into DAP's support?

Kerk faces another potential complication. Some voters disillusioned with Harapan and the federal government are considering backing Bersama, which is fielding Chinese Muslim lawyer Muhaimin Lau Abdullah.

In an interview with Malaysiakini, Muhaimin said his campaign would focus on the economy, youth incomes, and the need for stronger checks and balances against the government.

Asked whether Bersama's presence could eat into DAP's support, he stopped short of a direct answer. Instead, he pointed to the Negeri Sembilan polls, arguing that Harapan had suffered losses even without Bersama in the picture.

Bersama's Ayer Keroh candidate Muhaimin Lau Abdullah


Malaysiakini's street interviews also picked up a small but notable group of voters expressing support for Bersama, with some describing the party as an agent of change.

But the implications for Kerk will depend largely on where these votes come from.

If Bersama attracts former Harapan supporters, it could chip away at the very votes Kerk needs to retain Ayer Keroh. If its support comes instead from the opposition camp, the electoral equation would look quite different.

There is also a third possibility: Bersama could persuade some voters who had intended to sit out the election to turn up because they now have another option.

Ultimately, Ayer Keroh is more than a fight for one state seat. For DAP, it is about defending an 18-year stronghold. For Gerakan, it is a chance to reclaim political relevance. For Bersatu and Bersama, it is an opportunity to establish themselves as viable alternatives.

And for the Umno-PAS partnership, the contest will test whether its combined political clout can translate into votes, regardless of who flies the flag.

The great souls who give us anchors and sails





The great souls who give us anchors and sails


Sir Patrick Stewart was man who understood that true leadership is not about power or authority, but about integrity, compassion and the courage to do what is right


Updated 1 day ago · Published on 31 Oct 2026 8:55AM


Sir Patrick Stewart, a gentleman in every sense of the word. - October 31, 2026




by Vinod Sekhar



WINY and I have always been passionate Star Trek fans. Especially Star Trek: The Next Generation.

At the heart of it was Captain Jean-Luc Picard, a character whose moral compass, courage, wisdom, and unwavering belief in humanity gave us something to aspire to.

But beyond the character was the man himself. Sir Patrick Stewart. A gentleman in every sense of the word. Kind, generous, extraordinarily intelligent, humble and open.

A man who understood that true leadership is not about power or authority, but about integrity, compassion and the courage to do what is right.

Qualities that should define leaders in every field, not just on the bridge of the Enterprise.

I had the privilege of meeting him thrice in my life. And I treasure every one of those encounters.

As we grow older, I become increasingly aware of how many extraordinary souls we are losing. People who, often without ever knowing it, helped shape our values, inspired our dreams and reminded us of the better angels of our nature.

They gave us anchors when the seas were rough, and sails when we needed the courage to venture beyond the horizon.

We are losing too many, too quickly. And with each passing, a little piece of the world that shaped us disappears.

But perhaps that is the greatest legacy of truly remarkable people. They remind us not merely of what humanity is, but of what humanity can be.

And that is something worth holding on to.

Live long and prosper. – October 31, 2026



Datuk Dr Vinod Sekhar is the publisher of The Vibes and Chairman of the Petra Group


At least eight Palestinians killed in Israeli attacks across Gaza

 


At least eight Palestinians killed in Israeli attacks across Gaza

Four-year-old among eight Palestinians killed in Israeli drone attacks across the Gaza Strip.

Save

EDITORS NOTE: Graphic content / An ambulance drives past a blood stain on the ground following an Israeli strike that killed three people in Gaza City's Al-Remal neighbourhood on November 1, 2026.
An ambulance drives past a blood stain on the ground following an Israeli strike that killed civilians in Gaza City's Al-Remal neighbourhood on November 1, 2026 [AFP]

At least eight Palestinians, including a four-year-old boy, have been killed by the Israeli military in Gaza, hospital sources told Al Jazeera.

An Israeli drone attack killed five Palestinian police officers and wounded several people in al-Mawasi, west of Khan Younis, in southern Gaza on Sunday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Israeli forces had targeted a number of police officers while they were “performing their routine duties”, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Interior and National Security.

The ministry condemned the “horrific massacre” and called on the international community “to take urgent action and exert pressure” on Israel to stop its killing of policemen.

It said in a statement at least 75 police officers and security personnel have been killed by Israel since the “ceasefire” with Hamas came into effect in October last year.

The Israeli army meanwhile claimed that its attack was targeting “a terrorist” in southern Gaza.

Separately, in northern Gaza, at least three Palestinians, including a four-year-old boy, were killed in a drone attack on Gaza City’s Rimal neighbourhood, sources at al-Shifa Hospital said. The Taj Mall was also targeted.

Another person died on Sunday from wounds sustained during a previous attack.


“It’s hard to remember a day gone by when we haven’t reported on deadly attacks across the Gaza Strip,” said Al Jazeera’s Hani Mahmoud, reporting from Gaza City.

“In the last couple of hours, a group of law enforcement officers patrolling al-Mawasi … to protect displaced civilians was targeted. Five policemen were killed instantly.

“An hour on from that attack … in the heart of Gaza City, three people were reported killed – including a father and his three-year-old son – who were walking down Revolution Street,” he said, adding that Israeli attacks have not stopped despite the so-called “ceasefire” in place for more than a year.

‘Continuation of the genocidal war’

Hamas on Sunday condemned the latest Israeli attacks as a “deliberate war crime”.

In a statement, it denounced the “horrific massacre” that targeted a group of police officers as well as the “bombardment of Gaza City” that killed and wounded civilians.

The deliberate and repeated targeting of police officers while they perform their duties is part of Israel’s “attempt to obstruct recovery efforts, undermine stability in the Gaza Strip, and sow chaos”, the statement said, adding that “international silence and the failure to confront these horrific crimes only embolden the occupation”.

“This is yet another chapter in the ongoing series of Zionist atrocities against our Palestinian people … a continuation of the genocidal war whose tragic unfolding our people are still enduring,” Hamas said.

Israeli forces continue to attack Gaza, despite a US-brokered “ceasefire” taking effect last October, killing more than 1,500 people since then.

At least 74,594 Palestinians have been killed since Israel launched its genocidal war in October 2023, in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel, according to the Gaza Ministry of Health.


What Melaka knew about unity in diversity

 


What Melaka knew about unity in diversity

What Melaka knew about unity in diversity

The claim that non-Malay presence in the peninsula is a colonial residue does not stand before the facts of history.

a kathirasen

In calling on Malaysians to reject the politics of hatred based on race and religion on Oct 25, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said some people were attempting to “distort history by claiming that this country can only be saved through the victory of a single race”.

“If our ancestors succeeded in building the Melaka Malay Sultanate into a great empire, we can do the same through peace, unity among all quarters, and sound development strategies,” he said.

I couldn’t agree more. And history proves him right.

In recent decades the tension over whose country this is has taken on a life of its own, with those arguing for ketuanan Melayu or calling non-Malays pendatang gaining in strength. So much so that it has put many non-Malay citizens on the defensive.

It is as if Malay political strength and cosmopolitan composition are rivals for the same space.

They need not be, as Melaka’s history shows.

For roughly a century, the most important port in the Malay world was simultaneously the most thoroughly Malay polity in the region and one of the most diverse places on earth. Both facts were true at once. Neither diluted the other.

The Sultanate of Melaka was unambiguously Malay and Islamic. The court spoke Malay, kept Malay adat, drew its ceremonial rituals from Hindu-derived concepts filtered through centuries of courtly tradition, and derived legitimacy from control of the Strait of Melaka.

And yet the city’s population was staggering in its variety. Tomé Pires, writing within living memory of the sultanate’s fall, described traders from around the world who spoke somewhere around eighty-four languages in the port.

Gujarati Muslim traders and Tamil merchants from India traded here; Hokkien and Cantonese-speaking Chinese merchants ran warehouses; and Javanese, Siamese, Cham, Ryukyuan, Arab, Persian and Filipino traders also maintained quarters here.

There were resident communities with temples, mosques, shrines and headmen of their own.

This diversity was not incidental to Melakan power. It was Melakan power. The sultanate’s wealth came from being the place where the South China Sea met the Indian Ocean.

And that could only work if an Indian Muslim or Tamil merchant, a junk owner from Quanzhou and a pepper shipper from Java could all find or agree on the same weights, the same credit practices and the same language of contract.

Cosmopolitanism was not a value Melaka upheld. It was the economic base.

Melaka’s answer to governing this population was administrative rather than ideological. The state appointed a Shahbandar — the chief port master — to oversee all traders and revenue. The Shahbandar managed distinct trading quarters, registered merchants, collected taxes, settled internal disputes, and liaised with the government.

In practice this gave each community customary autonomy over its own affairs (marriage, inheritance, temple and mosque management), while the Bendahara handled internal Malay affairs. All commercial, criminal and appellate jurisdiction, however, rested with the sultanate.

The arrangement deserves attention precisely because it looks superficially like what colonial administrators later built and what Malaysian coalition politics later imitated — separate channels for separate communities. But the difference is structural, and it matters for how we think about unity today.

Under colonial rule, communal separation was the point. British policy froze categories through census classification, partitioned schooling by language, segregated employment by race, and treated intermixture as a management problem. Communities coexisted economically while remaining socially sealed, held together from above by an administration that belonged to none of them.

Melaka’s system separated for the purpose of incorporation. The Shahbandar registered you so you could trade, marry, inherit and litigate inside Melaka’s order. The Undang-Undang Melaka and the maritime code recognised community customs while reserving commercial, criminal and appellate jurisdiction to the state.

Malay was the lingua franca of the market and the court, and participation in that common life was the price and the reward of belonging.

Movement across lines was expected and routine. Chinese traders married locally and produced Baba-Nyonya culture. Indian Muslims settled into quarters that became permanent neighbourhoods, as did the Tamil merchants. And Arab Syed families entered Malay genealogies.

Conversion to Islam opened the fullest paths into the elite, and did so without erasing the commercial networks converts had brought with them.

Unity here meant a shared sovereign frame, a shared commercial language and a shared legal horizon — not shared blood, shared schooling or shared culture. Diversity was not accommodated at the margin. It was administered at the centre.

Against this record, the claim that non-Malay presence in the peninsula is a colonial residue awaiting digestion does not survive contact with the evidence. The ancestors of today’s Malaysian Chinese and Malaysian Indian communities were not confined to nineteenth-century steamships.

Long before Penang, Singapore and Melaka passed to Britain, there were resident Chinese, Tamil, Indian Muslim, Gujarati and Arab populations under Malay sovereignty here. They were registered, taxed, and adjudicated; and they even intermarried.

They were not guests awaiting permanent permission and the Shahbandar was not a manager of ethnicities.

That historical fact dismantles the foundational premise of ethnic exclusivism — that Malayness and non-Malay residence are, in principle, incompatible claims on the same land.

Five hundred years of Malay statecraft say otherwise, in Jawi script, in the records of a Malay court.

Honesty, however, requires stating the limits. Melaka was a transit entrepôt with a small population, perhaps tens of thousands, many of them sojourners, governed as subjects rather than citizens, and ranked by status and religion in ways no modern Malaysian would want restored.

So Melaka is not a blueprint. Nobody should propose reviving the Shahbandar offices. But it is something more useful than a blueprint: it is a refutation. It removes the alibi. If exclusion is defended on the grounds that Malay civilisation has always been exclusive, the fifteenth-century record contradicts the defence.

If assimilation is defended on the grounds that diversity requires uniformity to be governable, the fifteenth-century record contradicts that too.

What survives the comparison is a definition. Melaka shows that this region produced a working model of unity in diversity in which unity meant shared sovereignty, shared law and shared language, while diversity meant real autonomy of custom, belief and association.

The unity did not require the diversity to dissolve. The diversity did not threaten the unity.

This is an opportune time to remember this historical fact, as voters prepare to go to the polls in Melaka next month.

Some politicians will surely tell voters that they must choose between affirming Malay identity and embracing the country’s plural character; that they must unite to save their race or religion. Others may say voters need to come together to defend their rights.

The city’s own history says the choice being thrown at them was invented by colonial administrators who preferred divided subjects to a mixed populace. Before the colonialists came, the most successful Malay state in history proved the two were never opposites.

It would be asking a great deal of a banner-waving election season to engage with that. But the evidence sits there, in plain sight, in the very state being fought over — and it is worth saying out loud, in Melaka, before the voting: this country’s diversity is not a problem Malay civilisation inherited from outsiders. It is an achievement Malay civilisation once mastered.

The writer can be contacted at: kathirasen@yahoo.com