
From Statesman to Controversy: Mahathir’s Reputation Under Fire
4 Jan 2026 • 12:00 PM MYT

FlyingBird
Passionate about sharing authentic local news
4 Jan 2026 • 12:00 PM MYT

FlyingBird
Passionate about sharing authentic local news

Sinar Harian
Former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has once again found himself at the centre of political controversy, this time over his apparent association with controversial blogger Wan Muhammad Azri Wan Deris, widely known as Papagomo. The development has reignited debate about how far Malaysia’s longest-serving leader is willing to go in his continued opposition to the current government, and what it means for the legacy he leaves behind.
Dr Mahathir, who turned 100 in 2025, once stood as one of the most dominant figures in Malaysian politics. However, his influence has waned significantly in recent years. The 15th General Election marked a historic low point when Parti Pejuang Tanah Air, the party he founded, failed to secure a single parliamentary seat. Dr Mahathir himself also lost his long-held Langkawi seat, a defeat that symbolised the collapse of his political comeback.
Against this backdrop, public attention was drawn to a recent appearance in which Dr Mahathir and Papagomo were seen together, prompting strong reactions across the political spectrum. Critics viewed the association as a stark contrast to Dr Mahathir’s former image as a statesman, arguing that aligning himself with a figure frequently linked to provocative and divisive rhetoric reflected a troubling shift in judgment.
Papagomo has long courted controversy due to statements widely criticised as defamatory or racially charged. His legal troubles have further fuelled public scrutiny. In August 2025, he pleaded not guilty in the Magistrate’s Court to charges related to failing to notify authorities of changes in business details involving a company allegedly used to collect public donations. These donations were reportedly linked to the payment of a defamation fine stemming from a case involving Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Earlier, in 2024, the High Court ordered Papagomo to remove defamatory remarks made against Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain after ruling against him in another defamation suit.
For many observers, Dr Mahathir’s willingness to appear alongside such a figure has raised uncomfortable questions. Critics argue that the move undermines the moral authority he once commanded and risks overshadowing decades of influence with decisions seen as driven by political bitterness rather than principle. Some have suggested that the alliance reflects a continued determination to destabilise the current administration, regardless of the reputational cost.
Supporters, however, maintain that Dr Mahathir remains a significant voice of dissent and argue that his actions should be viewed as part of a broader struggle against what he percees as governance failures. They contend that age and electoral setbacks have not diminished his right to participate actively in political discourse.
Still, as public debate intensifies, the episode has reinforced a growing perception that Dr Mahathir’s post-premiership years are increasingly defined by controversy. For a leader once synonymous with power, reform, and national direction, the question now being asked is whether these late political choices will ultimately redefine how history remembers him.
***
I have a feeling no one cares a hoot





















