Saturday, April 27, 2024

Analysts: With Perikatan snapping at its heels, Kuala Kubu Baru by-election no walk in the park for Anwar’s unity govt





Analysts: With Perikatan snapping at its heels, Kuala Kubu Baru by-election no walk in the park for Anwar’s unity govt




Perikatan Nasional (PN) chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and PN candidate for the Kuala Kubu Baru by-election, Khairul Azhari Saut during the announcement at the PN operations centre in Batang Kali, April 25, 2024. — Picture by Hari Anggara

Saturday, 27 Apr 2024 7:00 AM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR, April 27 — The upcoming Kuala Kubu Baru by-election comes at a pivotal moment for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s administration, which has pledged significant reforms and progress but has yet to deliver substantial results.

The seat fell vacant following the death of its three-term assemblyman, Lee Kee Hiong, on March 21 due to cancer.


Marking the seventh by-election under the unity government, this electoral contest unfolds against a backdrop of pressing issues and contentious events.

From the “Allah” socks controversy to the prospect of fuel subsidy reductions, public concern looms large.


As the 47,412 voters in Kuala Kubu Baru prepare to cast their ballots on May 11, the by-election stands as a litmus test for the Anwar administration’s ability to translate promises into tangible change, amidst a landscape marked by scepticism and unresolved challenges.


Green shoots, green wave?


Yet, the current landscape does not guarantee success for Perikatan Nasional (PN) in Selangor, which has, in recent weeks, come to be perceived as a relatively pragmatic coalition, particularly in its response to the “Allah” socks controversy, where it backed a “ceasefire” amid escalating racial tensions.

The 15th general election (GE15) in 2022 and ensuing six state elections in August last year saw the “green wave” spearheaded by PN making further inroads into Selangor, Negeri Sembilan and Penang, while almost shutting out its rivals entirely in Kedah, Kelantan and Terengganu with an average voter turnout of 70.4 per cent.

Presently, however, Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu), the lynchpin party of PN, is putting out fires on the home front as seven of its representatives — six MPs and one Selangor state assemblyman— have thrown their support behind Anwar.

This development has placed Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, the president of Bersatu and chairman of PN, under scrutiny over his leadership abilities.

In an apparent effort to broaden its appeal among non-Malay voters, PN also recently welcomed the Malaysian Indian People’s Party (MIPP) into its ranks as its newest component, led by former MIC leader P. Punithan, who was also appointed as a deputy chairman of the PN coalition.

Selangor MB’s appeal

In last year’s state election, Kuala Kubu Baru incumbent, the late Lee Kee Hiong of DAP, successfully defended the seat, defeating Teoh Kien Hong (Gerakan), Siva Prakash Ramasamy (Muda), and Chang Boon Lai (Parti Rakyat Malaysia) with a majority of 4,119 votes.

Senior fellow at Nusantara Academy for Strategic Research, Azmi Hassan, said he believes this historical trend could repeat itself this time, attributing it more to the positive appeal of Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari rather than Anwar’s influence.

“Yes, there are several issues that the federal government faces right now. Voters are quite upset, but this is a by-election in Kuala Kubu Baru. I think the state government of Selangor under Amirudin is doing pretty well. The state government’s efforts will basically save the day for Pakatan Harapan (PH) in Kuala Kubu Baru.

“The chances for PH or the unity government — in this case the DAP — to keep their seat is quite high,” Azmi said, noting that despite PN’s significant influence in the last state election, DAP still clinched the seat with a majority of over 4,000 votes.

Voter patterns

Syaza Syukri, political analyst at the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), shared Azmi’s perspective but warned against underestimating PN’s prospects too hastily.

“I think DAP’s candidate still has a slight edge over PN’s because of the track record within the constituency itself, instead of looking at wider national politics. But it will be tough, because PN will be gunning for Malay votes.

“I think MIPP joining PN could definitely help PN win slightly more Indian voters, more from the community’s unhappiness with the government,” she told Malay Mail.

This view was echoed by Azmil Tayeb, a political analyst with Universiti Sains Malaysia, who agreed that PN might mount a campaign highlighting the government’s perceived weaknesses.

“The unity government’s chances depend on PH’s ability to fire up its supporters and maximise turnout.

“PN could campaign on corruption issues like it did in GE15, especially Zahid Hamidi’s DNAA and Najib’s pardon and house arrest.

“In last year’s state election, there was a discernible shift of Indian voters going to PN. We might see that trend again,” he said when contacted by Malay Mail.

Regarding the possibility of lower voter turnout due to political fatigue, Syaza stated that such by-elections typically witness a reduced number of voters.

“Because of that, every vote matters. The more politically motivated ones will go out to vote, but to get the others, it requires something major like a blunder by the government or something similar to the ‘Allah’ socks issue to rile up the people,” she added.

PN has named Hulu Selangor Bersatu acting division chief Khairul Azhari Saut as its candidate for Kuala Kubu Baru.

Muhyiddin made the announcement at the coalition’s by-election headquarters on Thursday, saying that the PN supreme council had unanimously agreed that the 54-year-old Hulu Selangor-born businessman was the right candidate to secure a win in the state by-election for the Opposition coalition.

PH, meanwhile, announced Pang Sock Tao as its candidate. Pang, 31, previously served as a news presenter for DAP’s UbahTV and as the press secretary to Local Government Minister Nga Kor Ming, among other career highlights.

The Election Commission (EC) has fixed April 27 for nominations and May 11 for polling.


***


kt comments:

Many supporters of DAP are wondering whether to 'frighten' the DSAI government for its 'reformasi' go-starn behaviour and risk the green wave putting its foot into the door?


MB: Perak to collaborate with rare earth elements firm from S. Korea





MB: Perak to collaborate with rare earth elements firm from S. Korea




Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad during a working visit to the Murata Innovation Museum in Kyoto, Japan, April 25, 2024. — Picture from Facebook/Saarani Mohamad

Friday, 26 Apr 2024 10:56 PM MYT



IPOH, April 26 — The Perak state government is expected to establish cooperation with Star Group Industries (SGI), a leading South Korean company with experience in the production of downstream products of rare earth elements (REE).

Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Saarani Mohamad said the company will visit the state next month and further details regarding the collaboration will be discussed in a meeting involving both parties.


“SGI, which is led by the founder and chief executive officer Kong Kun Seong, has shown interest in working together and expressed his desire to visit Perak next month to discuss further.

“This is a positive development and it is a follow-up to the state government’s work visit there where we were also taken to visit the SGI factory in Daegu, which produces REE downstream products,” he said in a Facebook post today.


Saarani led a state government delegation on a working visit to South Korea and Japan from April 20 to 27, 2024.


The purpose of the visit is to attract companies from both countries to invest in Perak, particularly in the mineral industry, electric vehicles (EV), solid waste management, and green energy.

The menteri besar also noted that the collaboration with SGI also has the potential to complete the supply chain of the automotive industry, particularly in implementing the Automotive Hi-Tech Valley (AHTV) project in Tanjung Malim, Perak, without having to rely on raw materials imported from outside.

“Among the most important components in the automotive industry are permanent magnets that produce magnetic induction motors, hybrid starter generator magnets, integrated electric brakes, electric power steering motors and various other high-tech components,” he said.

Saarani said the cooperation that will be established between the two parties is also seen to provide great benefits to the state, especially in providing job opportunities.

“Imagine how many job opportunities we can create through these new industries. It will certainly be beneficial for the people of Perak, especially the young people,” he said. — Bernama


***


kt comments:

Just make sure it won't be another of the old coot & his Jap mateys' A.R.E (Asian Rare Earth) scandal in Bukit Merah


Count me out but time for a change, says Khairy on FAM hot seat





Count me out but time for a change, says Khairy on FAM hot seat




Khairy Jamaluddin said that being the president of FAM required a person to be hands-on, and he currently did not have the time and space to carry out such a duty. — Bernama pic

Friday, 26 Apr 2024 9:28 PM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR, April 26 — Former youth and sports minister Khairy Jamaluddin has admitted that he never harboured any thoughts on returning to the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) after his name was linked to the presidency of the governing body.

Khairy, or better known as KJ, who was also former deputy president in FAM, said there were other candidates more qualified than he is to lead the parent body.


He said that being the president of FAM required a person to be hands-on, and he currently did not have the time and space to carry out such a duty.

“Due to the focus given to football, he (the president) needs to be a very ‘hands-on’ person and may have to deal with the daily management at FAM and I may not have the time at the moment to take on that role.


“I like to be hands-on when I work, and I don’t have time, so it’s unfair for FAM if I try my luck in the upcoming FAM election,” he said on the hot seat when met at the Battle of the Reds Motivational Talk event here today.


Prior to this, Khairy’s name cropped up as a possible candidate for the FAM president’s post held by Datuk Hamidin Mohd Amin since 2018, following the spread of a poison-pen letter that discredited the parent body’s leadership and management.

The FAM Election is scheduled to take place next year.

At the same time, Khairy, who is a board member of the Johor Darul Ta’zim Football Club (JDT) felt that the time had come for a transformation in FAM.

Without faulting or discrediting the current leadership, he described the change as necessary for the continued progress of national football as a whole for the future.

“This is my personal view, maybe it’s time for a change in FAM, I think the existing management has done its job but since we want to look at the next five to 10 years, I think it’s time for a transition in FAM,” said the former Rembau MP.

Meanwhile, today’s ceremony saw about 200 fans having the opportunity to meet up close and take memorable pictures with the legendary line-up of two English clubs, Manchester United and Liverpool.

The Manchester United legends who were present at the ceremony which lasted about two hours were Wes Brown, Dimitar Berbatov, Danny Webber and Paul Rachubka while the Liverpool legends were John Arne Riise, Luis Garcia, Vladimir Smicer and Steve McManaman.

The ceremony was held in conjunction with the “Battle of the Reds” match between the legends of Manchester United and Liverpool at the National Stadium in Bukit Jalil tomorrow night.

Battle of the Reds is supported by the Malaysian Convention & Exhibition Bureau (MyCEB) — an agency under the Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture — the Ministry of Youth and Sports, Stadium Corporation of Malaysia (PSM) and FAM. — Bernama


Friday, April 26, 2024

US embassy refutes American professor Bruce Gilley’s claim, says Malaysia still safe to travel

 

SCMP:


US embassy refutes American professor Bruce Gilley’s claim, says Malaysia still safe to travel

  • Gilley said he left the country due to safety concerns caused by an ‘Islamo-fascist mob whipped up by the government’
  • The academician was panned for his controversial comments made during a lecture at the University of Malaya

The US embassy in Kuala Lumpur has affirmed that Malaysia is still safe to travel, negating American academician Bruce Gilley’s claim that it is not.

“There is no change to the US travel advisory, which remains at Level 1, the lowest level out of four,” it said in a statement.

According to the United States Bureau of Consular Affairs, Level 1 is the lowest advisory level for safety and security, between Levels 1 to 4, and 4 being “do not travel”.

At Level 1, travellers are to exercise normal precautions in the country, it said.

The US State Department’s website showed that Malaysia has been on Level 1 since its last update on July 24, 2023. Additionally, its country information on Malaysia says that the two sides have healthy bilateral ties.

“Economic ties are robust, and there is a long history of people-to-people exchanges. Malaysia has a diverse democracy and is an important partner in US engagement with Southeast Asia,” it said.

Earlier this week, Gilley claimed in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that Malaysia is not safe to travel to.

He said on the social media platform that he had left Malaysia due to safety concerns caused by an “Islamo-fascist mob whipped up by the government there”.

Recently, the University of Malaya (UM) had invited Gilley to speak, which caused controversy.

Gilley purportedly claimed that Malaysia had pushed for a “second Holocaust against the Jewish people” during his talk, and downplayed the country’s ties with the US.

US professor Bruce Gilley delivers a lecture at the Universiti of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur. Photo: BruceDGilley/X

After the cancellation of all events involving Gilley by Higher Education Minister Dr Zambry Abd Kadir, the academician has since returned to America.

Further sparking outrage, he posted that he will not accept reimbursement for his travels from the university, choosing instead to ask the public to fund his costs via an online platform.

“[Gilley’s] social media post on the safety of travelling in Malaysia is too much. It is irresponsible and can cause anger among all Malaysians,” UM said in a statement.

"Where Is Justice...?" Angry Dr M Lashes Out At Both International And Local Laws!





"Where Is Justice...?" Angry Dr M Lashes Out At Both International And Local Laws!


26 Apr 2024 • 11:00 AM MYT


JK Joseph
Repentant ex-banker who believes in truth, compassion and some humour



Credit Image: Sinar Harian


Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who was hospitalised for a prolonged period due to infection prior to the recent Hari Raya Aidilfitri festive season, appears to be back to his combative best; and this time, it looks like, he has been training his guns at “laws” - both international and local!


In a recent post on his popular Facebook account, the 98yo ex-prime minister, in his trademark matter-of-fact style, took a potshot at “international law” where he literally questioned its credibility and legality.


According to him, while the world believed that international law can help to deal with the violation of justice between countries, apparently countries such as the United States of America (USA) rejected the concept of equality for every nation under the law.


Probably, what angered him greatly was that in the United Nations Charter there was even a provision for exceptions to be made for certain nations who put themselves above the said law, where they can exercise veto power.


Another thing that seemed to pique the strong-minded nonagenarian is that according to international law, in a conflict the winner seems to enjoy the right to prosecute and judge the wrongdoings of the losers.


However, he asserted that this practice was not fair as by right, judgement must be made by neutral (third) parties; furthermore he lamented the fact that winners did not have to be answerable to anyone.


While to some, the former Umno president may have hit the bullseye with his latest stinging comments on the west, particularly his bogeyman the USA- his critics may be pointing a finger back at him; after all, wasn't he known also to be beyond reproach - often refusing to acknowledge his blunders and reluctant to accept blame when things go wrong?


In fact, some years ago writer K George had highlighted that for Dr Mahathir, democracy, freedom, and human rights have different interpretations - just like how the west appears to have its own whimsical take on all that?


And while he has always condemned the west for their skewed sense of justice, hasn't Dr M’s own principles of natural justice and rule of law been called into question many times?


In fact, back in 1998 when he was faced with the prospect of dismissing his deputy Anwar Ibrahim due to differences between them - including alleged bailing out of his cronies, which the latter apparently objected - didn't Dr Mahathir, who has always maintained that an accused person is innocent until convicted, “declare” that he could not allow an immoral person like Anwar to be the prime minister of Malaysia?


Meanwhile, in an earlier Facebook post on April 17, he had posted another article alleging that the current government was using local laws in an oppressive way to threaten some people - including himself who was being investigated for asset declaration!


His two entrepreneur sons, Mokhzani Mahathir and Mirzan Mahathir, have also been ordered to compile and collate 43 years' worth of information to declare their assets to the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC) earlier this year - failing which they could be jailed.


But during his first tenure as prime minister, didn’t his government also use obnoxious local laws such as the Internal Security Act, the Official Secrets Act, the Police Act, the Printing Presses and Publications Act, and the Sedition Act to instil fear in people's minds and to suppress dissent in the face of several scandals?


And what about the infamous "Operation Lalang" when his government imprisoned many people virtually without trial and suspended the licences of several vocal newspapers, depriving many families of their only source of income?


Or what about the manner his government subdued the judiciary which saw the Lord President, Salleh Abas, and two other Supreme Court judges dismissed. Didn't many of the victims back then also cry out: “where is justice?”


While the country's ex-strongman who is known for his wit and vision, may be right in some aspects, what many may be asking is - how can a man who at one time was held in such high regard as a statesman, still remain in denial and myopic to the injustices committed under his own watch?


Information Source: Dr Mahathir Facebook and Aliran

JK Joseph is a content creator under the Newswav Creator programme, where you get to express yourself, be a citizen journalist, and at the same time monetize your content & reach millions of users on Newswav. Log in to creator.newswav.com and become a Newswav Creator now!


Either you are for the working class or against it, Anwar. You can't run with the foxes and hunt with the hounds





Either you are for the working class or against it, Anwar. You can't run with the foxes and hunt with the hounds


26 Apr 2024 • 10:30 AM MYT



TheRealNehruism
Writer. Seeker. Teacher



Image credit: Focus Malaysia


It is an open secret that most of the elites in the country contribute nothing of value to the country. The overwhelming majority of the CEOs, Managing directors and decision makers in the business world have a parasitic relationship with the organization they control. The lion’s share of value and wealth that any organization generates actually comes from the B40 and M40 workers in the organization, but the lion’s share of the organization's wealth is parasitically sucked up by the elites, who have little to no part in the value creation of the organization.


Even Anwar’s own government has reported that our current model of the economy enables up to 53 percent of our subsidies to be sucked up by just the top 20 percent of the population. Subsidies are not the only way that the elites parasitically suck up the resources and wealth of the country, by the way. Other than national subsidies, they also suck up the wealth and resources that organizations and business entities in the country generate.


Anwar recently said that government must not be hasty in implementing reforms as it needs to consider the repercussions of the changes that are made.


“Any promised reforms by the government must be implemented carefully to ensure the people are prepared to embrace the changes,” he says


According to Anwar, there is a lesson to be learnt from what took place in France in the 18th century after the French Revolution, when the people’s living conditions became worse because of the radical changes made by the new leaders.



“Therefore, we should not hastily fulfil the desires of the elite without considering the political implications, stability, and the repercussions of such changes.


“There is a major disconnect between the idea of immediate change and the readiness of the people,” he claimed at PKR’s 25th anniversary special convention at the Ideal Convention Centre here recently.


I find it strange and disturbing, to hear Anwar claim that it is the elite that are desirous of change, but he has to restrain their desire, because he does not want their desire for change to affect the people’s lives negatively.


I find it strange because it is almost impossible that the elites, who are the ones that are chiefly benefitting from the exploitative model of economy, which not only exploits millions of our own B40 and M40 workers, but downright oppresses millions of foreign workers, are clamoring for change.


If our elites were the sort that clamors for change, our economy wouldn’t be the sort that exploits local workers or oppresses the foreign workers in the first place!


Also, why would the vast majority of people in the country need time to embrace the changes, like Anwar claims, if the changes that he seeks to implement is to demolish the control mechanism that these parasitical and exploitative elites have imposed on the country, to undermine the value that M40 and B40 workers generate for the nation, pilfer the wealth of the nation, oppress millions of foreign workers and cause the nation to not only be permanently stuck in the middle income trap, but bleed the nation to the extent that we have been slowly drifting back to the third world nation status that took our forefathers generations to rise out from.


I also find Anwar’s statement disturbing, because although he coats his words with the language of reason and sensibility, if you inspect what he is saying and who is he saying it to, it would seem that Anwar is actually speaking in support of the status quo while appearing like he is a force for change.

If he is really a force for change, he would have spoken to the elites and told them to prepare for change, not spoken to the people and asked us to be wary of change.


If Anwar was really sincere about the politics of reform, he would have asked the elites to repent and give up their addiction to wealth that is generated by exploitation, not portray them as heroes who are so desirous of change, that the prime minister himself has to step in to reign in their desire, less they too quickly change the economy from one that is exploitation oriented to one that is value generating!

Anwar has to choose sides.

That there is a powerful exploitative class in the country is of no doubt. Without a powerful exploitative class in the economy, there wouldn’t be millions and millions of exploited and oppressed foreign workers in the country. Having normalized an exploitative mindset, it is very unlikely that this exploitative class will just limit their exploitative ways on the foreign workers. In the same way that they apply exploitative tactics on the foreign workers, they surely do so on the local workers too. The difference is just in degrees, not in principle.


That this exploitative class will wrap their exploitative ways in a cloak of reason, sugar-coated language and presentation of goodwill or charity is also expected. The most exploitative CEOs in the country will take extraordinary steps to prevent themselves from being seen as people who suck the blood, tears and sweat of the working class to enrich themselves. Instead, they will always portray themselves as sweet and loving people, who despite earning their wealth by their own merit, are always charitable to the working class and ever seeking for ways to improve the lives of the people. Everything they do, they will portray, is only for the interest and wellbeing of the working class. If they have their way, they will even make it sound as if they are the ones who are most eager to dismantle the exploitative economic model that they created and profit from, and it is only for the sake of the working class that they exploit, that they resign themselves to accept the exploitative economic model.


Anwar must show that he can see through the illusions that the exploitative elites conjure to perpetuate the system of exploitation in the country.


If he can’t see through their illusions, but instead shows signs that he has been deluded by the illusions they conjure, he will start sounding like his sympathies and concerns are for the working people, but whose behaviour and actions will indicate that he is more interested in exploiting the working class that helping us.


If Anwar starts looking like he identifies with exploitative elites more than he does with the working class, then all his talk about reform and changes will be nothing more than a sham.


It will look like all his talk of reform was merely geared towards creating an image of being a pro-working class, so that he can win votes and become a prime minister, in the hopes that once he become the prime minister, he will be courted and welcomed with red carpet by the elites into their fold.


Once he is in the fold of the exploitative elites, he will do exactly what the exploitative elite has always done to the working class. They will collude with each other to control the platforms, institutions, organizations, resources, processes, procedures, laws and opportunities in the nation, and use their control to exploit the working class to their benefit.


If Anwar does not want to be seen in that light, he must change his language.


Stop portraying the exploitative elites as heroes. Stop asking the people to be patient with an exploitative and oppressive system that oppresses and exploits them. Advise the exploitative elites to change and turn over a new leaf, not ask the working class to be patient and enduring of their oppression and exploitation. Tell the exploitative elites to give up on the practice of colluding and creating illusions to exert control over people, resources, institutions and procedures, for the purpose of siphoning wealth that other people created, and instead free and enable the working class to generate true wealth by adding real value into the economy.



Nehru Sathiamoorthy is the author of “While Waiting for the World to end”. He was a columnist at FMT and a frequent contributor to the South China Morning Post, The Star, Malaysia-Today, MalaysiaNow, MalaysiaKini and Focus Malaysia.


Najib’s bid for “home detention” has just got one step closer



Murray Hunter

Najib’s bid for “home detention” has just got one step closer

Precedent will be important in Najib’s case

APR 26, 2024





A report in today’s Dayak Daily reports on a landmark decision to grant a 31 year old female prisoner licensed release for home detention. This is heralded as a major step in penal reform.

Former prime minister Najib Razak meets the criteria just turning 70 years old last year, and the commutation of his sentence by the Pardons Board on 29th January puts his remaining time to serve to just over 4 years.

This greatly strengthens Najib’s case for a judicial review to serve the remainder of his sentence at home. Najib claims that there was an addendum order by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in the royal pardon granted to him on Jan 29, whereby he was allowed to serve his prison sentence under house arrest.

Now Najib’s legal team has a precedent to cite to the court. Technically, according to new Department of Prisons guidelines Najib could commence release on license on 23rd August this year.

The argument there are currently no provisions for home detention has now been overcome.

The Dayak Daily article can be accessed here.


What About The Plight Of Doctors From Parallel Pathways?





What About The Plight Of Doctors From Parallel Pathways?



The MMC is embroiled in a tussle with the parallel pathway specialists and the medical genetics graduates over recognising their qualifications for the purpose of listing them in the National Specialists Register (NSR). Four cardiothoracic surgeons with qualifications from the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and six Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) graduates have filed legal action against the MMC over the dispute. The minister said recognition of all specialist programmes is being looked into.



“I put my foot down at the meeting and told them we cannot let this problem fester,” Zambry, who co-chaired the special meeting with health minister Dzulkefly Ahmad on Thursday, told FMT. “Otherwise, it’s the sick Malaysians waiting for long periods for treatment who will continue to suffer. The current situation cannot continue unabated, with the nation’s healthcare under severe stress due to the lack of specialists.”
(https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2024/04/20/zambry-calls-for-ceasefire-in-mmc-specialist-imbroglio/)



For the past month, this news has been in the headlines of every local paper. But I wonder why there was nary a murmur of solving the issue of doctors from unrecognised universities. Aren’t they also needed for the health sector to lessen the workload of doctors in mainly the government sector especially in Sabah and Sarawak? Are only specialists important for the health sector and when it involves them the Madani government suddenly springs into action? But lower level doctors are expandable and are not needed in Malaysia?



Haven’t these doctors also come from parallel pathway programs for their undergraduate studies? If all specialist programs should be recognised, why can’t all MBBS and MD programs also be recognised? Why can’t Article 12 which was brought in 1992 be removed by government legislations since the Madani government now has more than 2/3rds majority in parliament? Why the delay in revamping the medical sector?



And why can’t those who have completed the Australian AMC exams, the United States USMLE, the UK’s PLAB and Canadian Licensing exams also be accepted here in Malaysia? Aren’t these also parallel pathway exams which are world recognised? Everyday there is a cry of brain drain but when doctors who clear these exams are not accepted here, why should they come back to Malaysia?



Those with GMC recognition are allowed to come back and immediately work for just 1 year of housemanship instead of 2. How come this parallel pathway is allowed and even given preference but others are not?



This is the 10th letter which Finance Twitter has published from me. How many letters does it take to change the system? The courts failed in changing the system when 30 doctors took a case in 2004. But that was 20 years ago when the independence of courts was questioned. If a similar case comes up now, the outcome might be different.



Only the late Datuk Seri Chua Jui Meng in 2002 ordered the MMC to take these doctors in to work when Mahathir was out of the country. But when Mahathir returned, the tyrant once again put a stop to it as told by the late Datuk Seri Samy Vello when he met these doctors in 2003. Since then, there has always been this tussle between the undemocratic MMC where 2/3rds of their members are appointed; and the health ministers on this issue with the health ministers always falling in line with the wishes of the MMC.



It’s hightime the ministers remove MMC from the equation. The ministers are the ones who have the power to bring forth change. MMC is an archaic institution as claimed by none other than Datuk Chua Soi Lek in 2006 who was the Health Minister then. MMC’s role should only be in adding doctors to the medical registrar once they have finished the required housemanship and medical officer years. Not in recognition of universities which MMC does not have the manpower or capability to carry out as they replied in their sworn affidavit to the case filed by the 30 doctors.



Isn’t the WHO list of recognised universities of every country enough for doctors to come back and undergo housemanship? In the past an MMC official has had to resign as there was a scandal that the team that went to do recognition of a Russian university was just wined and dined to get the recognition process done.




If the MMC wants us to sit for an exam, then once a candidate passes it, they should be taken in as a medical officer and not just be made to go and join housemanship where they are basically trainee doctors. Only Malaysia practices this. In other countries, you immediately join as a medical officer. This is further proof that this qualifying exams are redundant.



If Russian universities which have only 3 years of active medical subjects taught in their medical programs accepted, why can’t doctors from other countries who do an active 6 years course also be accepted? The first 3 years of a Russian medical degree are a basic science program with animal husbandry and plant physiology. A physiotherapist can transfer to complete the final 3 years and come back and practice in Malaysia as MMC recognised the Russian universities.



Doctors trained privately in Indonesia were allowed credit transfers to government universities through agents. Those who had the cash went for it. They just had to complete the final 2 clinical years at these Indonesian government universities which were rocognised here. How come their classmates who were left behind didn’t have their theory years accepted for recognition and just asked to sit for a clinical exam when they returned? Why make them take the whole exam and insist they must pass both sections in one go? No other professional exam is conducted as such!



Recognition is a money making process for the universities involved. If Ramiah Medical College in India could see a jump of 60K to 130K in their capitation fees once their medical degree was recognised in 1990, please don’t say that money has no factor in the recognition process. Recognition is only done when there are MARA and JPA students in the overseas universities. So when is Madani going to get rid of this corrupt system which is based on race also? Is this the refomasi Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar claims to do?



The foreign classmates of unrecognised doctors can come and do specialist courses at our government universities and return to their countries as specialists. But here we refuse the Malaysians to even start as houseman as their same basic degree is unrecognised here. Please tell me there was no biasness involved.



Foreign doctors can practice here especially as specialists as we lack specialists, but we can’t allow our own Malaysians to put a foot in the door and work themselves up as specialists all because they are mainly Non-Malays whose parents sacrificed their blood, sweat and tears to see them graduate as doctors from parallel pathways when the country didn’t even have private medical studies available in the 90’s. Take them in today and they can still serve for the next 30 or more years of their active lives if they live to their 80s.



We don’t need MMC’s qualification exams. Different role numbers, no marks from course work, negative marking and answering in English while local candidates answer in BM was clearly meant to set them up for failure. Instead of saying that the passing rate is now about 40%, MMC should be questioned as to why it was only about 10% in the past. All this was the social engineering MMC partook in with the racist governments which ruled then.



So why is this Madani government still dragging their feet where MMC is concerned? It it because they have 5 years that they think they can push it under the carpet and then use it as another election promise to gullible voters to come into power again? It’s no use handing money all over the place like they are doing for pensioners hoping they will be voted back into power and forgetting those intellectuals who can’t even work due to legislative constraints. FDI will also not flow in where the educated sector has to leave to find employment to avoid being oppressed.



I’ve written about this in length in the other articles about unrecognised doctors Finance Twitter has published in the past few years. Please do take time to read them as each article has different points. Instead of shouting for the plight of people in other countries, it’s high time the Madani government pays attention to the needs of all Malaysians.



Signed,
Disillusioned Malaysian Doctor

U.S. Senate Passed Bill Forcing TikTok To Sell – But Here’s Why It’s Not A Done Deal Even If Biden Signed It Into Law





U.S. Senate Passed Bill Forcing TikTok To Sell – But Here’s Why It’s Not A Done Deal Even If Biden Signed It Into Law



Unable to accept the reality that a Chinese company could develop a highly popular app called TikTok, the United States has been trying everything in its power to control it. ByteDance now has two options – either sell it to American owners, or get ready to be banned. The Senate voted 79 to 18 after the House passed the legislation by a margin of 360 to 58.



President Joe Biden, who has previously said he would back the legislation, is expected to sign it into law on Wednesday. To expedite efforts to take over the short-video app, the legislation was attached as part of a larger US$95 billion package of foreign aid to Ukraine and Israel. From the initial 6 months, the latest revised legislation now gives ByteDance 9 months to sell.



Interestingly, the bill also says ByteDance cannot control TikTok’s secret sauce – the secret algorithm that powers the “For You” page, the reason why the app has been downloaded more than 4 billion times. When users open TikTok, the first thing they see is the “For You” page – an endless stream of videos uniquely tailored to each user. No two feeds are the same – the secret weapon that has made the app hugely popular.



To put it in perspective, the TikTok’s “For You” algorithm works like the Google’s search engine’s algorithm which dynamically determines which website or page on the Internet is the most relevant for a specific key word or key phrase and displays its first. Getting featured on “For You” page can either make or break a TikTok influencer’s video and potential career.



Therefore, to tell ByteDance that it can no longer control its secret algorithm is like telling Google that it must surrender its search engine algorithm. For years, American politicians have expressed concerns that Chinese authorities could force ByteDance to hand over U.S. user data. Like Huawei, the U.S. conveniently uses national security to threaten Chinese products.



So far, there has been “no evidence” the Chinese government has actually accessed the personal information of TikTok’s U.S. users or used that data to influence them. It appears the U.S. was trying to destroy TikTok because of jealousy more than due to national security threat. And Washington wanted to take over (or rather rob) the app by force due to its popularity.



Accusing TikTok of serving as a Trojan horse for Beijing to manipulate – even control – America and steal sensitive data on U.S. citizens is just a lame excuse. Hilariously, Biden is repeating Trump’s mistake to ban the same app in July 2020, threatening to shut down the extremely popular social media app if it could not be sold by its Chinese owner Bytedance to a U.S. buyer.



TikTok has about 170 million users in the United States, its biggest market outside of China. Its revenue was around US$20 billion last year. Founded in 2012 by entrepreneur Zhang Yiming, TikTok owner ByteDance reportedly had a private valuation of between US$105 billion and US$110 billion in May 2020, making it the most valuable start-up in the world.



ByteDance recorded revenue of US$120 billion in 2023 – up about 40% from a year earlier, driven by TikTok’s exploding growth. In comparison, Meta’s 2023 revenue rose 16% to US$134.90 billion. In the U.S. alone, the short video app’s revenue hit US$16 billion last year. One Bloomberg analyst even speculated that it could be worth up to US$180 billion in an IPO (initial public offering).



For years, tech giants like Facebook and YouTube have been competing directly with TikTok. In April, 2020, thanks to Coronavirus lockdown, TikTok amassed over 2-billion downloads on Google Play Store and Apple’s App Store, largely because people “trapped” at home wanted to keep themselves entertained. It came just 5 months after it surpassed 1.5 billion downloads.



It means on average, there were 100-million downloads every month leading to the 2-billion milestone. It became the first app after WhatsApp, Instagram and Messenger to break past the 2-billion downloads since 2014. As TikTok’s popularity skyrockets, so does its revenue. Users spent a whopping US$456.7 million when it hit a 2-billion downloads, up from US$175 million when it hit 1.5-billion downloads.




In what appears to be a shameless theft of the Chinese developed app, former treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin revealed that he was putting together a group of investors to buy TikTok. He said – “I understand the technology, it’s a great business, and I’m going to put together a group to buy TikTok”. So, is TikTok being forced to sell because of national security or business greed?



Forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok to Americans is like forcing Alphabet to sell Google to the Chinese. If it’s impossible for Google’s algorithm to fall into the hands of China, it’s also a wishful thinking that TikTok’s “secret sauce” can fall into the possession of the United States. Yes, the engine or the algorithm is the reason why Microsoft, Oracle, WalMart, Twitter, Netflix and even Triller, a rival app, wanted to buy TikTok previously.



But according to the South China Morning Post (SCMP) – “The car can be sold, but not the engine.” Even if ByteDance wants to sell TikTok’s algorithm, it can’t because an approval from Beijing is needed before Chinese companies can export their technologies. On the other hand, even if China agrees to allow ByteDance to sell TikTok, it can only be sold without the algorithm.



However, TikTok requires the algorithm to function, and the algorithm is Chinese home-grown technology, which in turn is considered China’s national security. Clearly, TikTok is a goldmine. When Trump signed an Executive Order on August 2020 to ban TikTok, Beijing slammed the “forced sale” of TikTok as “theft” and labelled the U.S. as nothing but a “rogue country”.



But even if Biden signed it, it’s not a done deal. TikTok has said it will fight any ban or forced sale of the app in the courts because the bill violated the “First Amendment” of the US Constitution, which protects freedom of speech. When the state of Montana tried to ban the app in 2023, a federal judge found it “oversteps state power and infringes on the constitutional rights of users,” with a “pervasive undertone of anti-Chinese sentiment.”



The legal challenge is not merely about first amendment alone. Previously, TikTok has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government over President Trump’s executive order, arguing that the ban prevents the company from due process, as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, which says that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.”



On September 27, 2020, a preliminary injunction was issued by Judge Carl J. Nichols blocking enforcement of Trump’s executive order to ban TikTok. Again, in December 2020, U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols in Washington said Trump overstepped his authority and therefore, blocked his administration’s attempt to ban TikTok in the country.



Crucially, many of TikTok’s 170 million monthly active U.S. users rely on the app to generate income. That includes 7 million small businesses that use the platform to drive growth, according to a report from Oxford Economics. About 39% percent of small businesses say that access to TikTok is critical to their businesses’ existence, while 69% of small businesses say TikTok has led to increased sales in the past year.



TikTok content creators who rely on the app have been trying to make their voices heard. For example, Tiffany Cianci, a content creator who has more than 140,000 followers on the platform, had encouraged TikTokers to show up in front the Capitol building to protest against the bill. She believes TikTok is the safest platform, arguing – “If our data is not safe on TikTok, I would ask why the president is on TikTok.”



Amusingly, Trump, who had tried to get rid of TikTok, has suddenly made a huge “U-Turn”. Making a comeback to redeem his defeat to Biden, the former POTUS who may return to the Oval Office said – “If you get rid of TikTok, Facebook and Zuckerschmuck will double their business. I don’t want Facebook, who cheated in the last Election, doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!”



China previously said it would oppose a forced sale of TikTok and has indicated that it does not have any plan to part with the app. In fact, Beijing warned ByteDance that it should strictly abide by Chinese laws and regulations – indicating that in worst case scenario, TikTok will shut down in America. China may retaliate, banning American apps, not to mention companies like Tesla or Apple.

Ustaz arrested for allegedly sodomising students

 

FMT:


Ustaz arrested for

allegedly sodomising

students

FMT Reporters-

He faces up to 20 years in jail and a whipping, if convicted.

25
SHARES
Total Views: 2,088
The 39-year-old suspect was arrested after the three boys lodged police reports on April 15.

PETALING JAYA: An ustaz at a tahfiz (religious school) in Machang, Kelantan, was arrested last week after allegedly sodomising three of his students two years ago.

Machang police chief Ahmad Shafiki Hussin said the 39-year-old suspect was arrested after the three boys, who are between 12 and 13 years of age, lodged police reports on April 15.

“In the reports, the victims claimed that they were forced to commit the act by the teacher,” Shafiki said in a Sinar Harian report.

Shafiki said police are investigating the case for sodomy under Section 377C of the Penal Code, which carries a sentence of up to 20 years in jail and a whipping upon conviction.