Sunday, January 25, 2026

Russia Launches First Ever Kh-22 Cruise Missile Strike on Kiev: Why Are They Near Impossible to Shoot Down?


Military Watch:


Russia Launches First Ever Kh-22 Cruise Missile Strike on Kiev: Why Are They Near Impossible to Shoot Down?

Eastern Europe and Central Asia , Aircraft and Anti-Aircraft



The Russian Aerospace Forces on January 24 for the first time launched Kh-22 cruise missiles to strike the Ukrainain capital Kiev, with 12 reportedly fired against targets in the city. The missiles are carried by Tu-22M3 strategic bombers exclusively, with their 6,000 kilogram weights making them to large to be effectively deployed by fighter-sized aircraft. The Kh-22 has been used extensively since the outbreak of full scale hostilities in February 2022, due in part to the sheer size of the Soviet arsenals which Russia  managed to keep in storage in good condition, which made them readily available. The age of the missiles, which are nearing their decommissioning dates, means they would soon need to be disposed of regardless of the situation in Ukraine, making it highly cost effective to utilise them in combat. 

Kh-22 Cruise Missile
Kh-22 Cruise Missile

Ukrainian Air Force Command spokesperson Yury Ignat previously singled out the capabilities of the Kh-22 cruise missile, noting that Ukrainain air defences had consistently been unable to intercept them. “I emphasise that it is impossible to shoot down Kh-22 missiles with the means we have in our arsenal,” he observed, highlighting the missile’s sheer speed as the reason. By late 2023 Russian forces had in less than two years fired approximately 300 Kh-22 missiles at targets across Ukraine, with Ukrainian air defences having failed to intercept a single one. Although Ukrainian sources have since claimed successful shootdowns, the veracity of these assertions remains in question, particularly considering both the history of claimed shootdowns that later proved to be false, and the limitations of air defence systems in service. 

Tu-22M3 Bomber with Kh-22 Cruise Missile
Tu-22M3 Bomber with Kh-22 Cruise Missile

The Kh-22 first entered frontline service in 1962, but still has few rivals in the world in terms of flight performance. The missiles were designed for anti-shipping roles to penetrate the multi layered air defences of U.S. Navy carrier strike groups, and achieved this with irregular trajectories and a very high near hypersonic speed of Mach 4.6. Although Russia has expanded its capacity for the production of multiple types of cruise and ballistic missile to several times the levels seen before 2022, production nevertheless remains dwarfed by the scales seen in the Soviet era, meaning once Kh-22 stocks are depleted, the country is unlikely to field a similarly large arsenal of air-launched long ranged cruise missiles again. 

Surface-to-Air Missile Launcher From S-200 Air Defence System
Surface-to-Air Missile Launcher From S-200 Air Defence System

Despite its strengths Kh-22’s suitability for land attack roles has nevertheless been called into question, with its guidance systems having been developed in the late 1950s to be able to home in on enemy warships, which has limited its ability to distinguish targets from ground clutter. Although Ukrainian forces may not have successfully shot down any of the missiles, the Ukrainian Air Force did succeed in April 2024 in shooting down a Tu-22M3 bomber, which was credited by Western and Ukrainian sources to a Soviet S-200 air defence system. The S-200 system was notably not in service in the Ukrainian Air Force when open hostilities with Russia broke out in February 2022, but the systems are reported to have either been brought out of storage or sent as aid from Poland which still relied on the heavily for its own defence. The system’s 300 kilometre engagement range has few rivals in the world, and makes it ideal for targeting large high value aircraft like the Tu-22M3. 

Trump threatens 100 percent tariff on Canada over China deal


al Jazeera:

Trump threatens 100 percent tariff on Canada over China deal


Donald Trump’s threat comes after Canada reached deal with China last week on trade of agriproducts, electric vehicles


Tensions escalated this week between United States President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney after Carney's speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos [AFP]



ByJillian Kestler-D'Amours
Published On 24 Jan 2026


Montreal, Canada – United States President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff against Canada if Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney moves ahead with an announced trade deal with China.

In a statement shared on Truth Social on Saturday morning, Trump said Carney is “sorely mistaken” if he thinks Canada can become a “‘Drop Off Port’ for China to send goods and products into the United States”.

“If Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with a 100% Tariff against all Canadian goods and products coming into the U.S.A,” Trump wrote in the post, which referred to Carney as “governor” instead of prime minister.

Carney’s office did not immediately respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment on Trump’s remarks.

The Canadian minister responsible for Canada-US trade, Dominic LeBlanc, said on X later on Saturday that “there is no pursuit of a free trade deal with China”.

Instead, he described a deal announced last week between Ottawa and Beijing as a “resolution on several important tariff issues”.

“Canada’s new government is building a stronger Canadian economy, with a plan that is building our strength at home and strengthening our trading partnerships throughout the world,” LeBlanc said.



Is the world's rules-based order ruptured?


Trump’s tariffs threat comes as tensions mounted between Canada and the US this week after Carney delivered an address at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that was widely seen as a rebuke of the Trump administration’s policies.

“We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition,” Carney said in the speech, urging the world’s “middle powers” to deepen cooperation in the face of coercion and threats.

The prime minister’s remarks drew the ire of Trump, who responded by saying that “Canada lives because of the United States”. “Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements,” he said in Davos.

Trump also revoked an invitation for Carney to join his so-called “Board of Peace” this week.

The US president has been threatening to impose steep levies on Canadian goods since before he formally came into office in January 2025, while he has repeatedly said he wants Canada to become the US’s “51st state”.

That has plunged ties between the North American neighbours to historic lows, and pushed Carney in recent months to seek out new economic partnerships, including with China, the European Union and Qatar.



What's edging Canada and China close?


“This is all part of Mr Carney’s goal to lessen [Canada’s] reliance on the United States,” Asa McKercher, a professor at St Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia specialised in Canada-US relations, told Al Jazeera after the Davos speech.

He’s a banker, so any sort of ‘diversified portfolio’ lessens our risk to certain shocks. That’s the way a banker would probably see it,” McKercher said.

“[Carney] senses the US is a risky trade and security partner, which is not a bad assessment given that Donald Trump is threatening a trade war against America’s closest allies.”

Last week, the Canadian government announced a “new strategic partnership” with China after Carney travelled to the country for talks with Chinese leaders.

The deal would see Beijing lower tariffs on canola and other agriproducts from Canada in exchange for Ottawa allowing as many as 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles into the Canadian market.

“At its best, the Canada-China relationship has created massive opportunities for both our peoples,” Carney said in a statement after the announcement.


The fight against corruption: surat kuning and Article 34(3) – Rocky Bru





Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim Iskandar has deemed the corrupt as traitors to the country, prompting debate on the need to stop alleged royal influence or “surat kuning” in the awarding of government contracts, and for firmer application of constitutional provisions preventing the king from active involvement in commercial enterprises during his reign. - Bernama pic, January 24, 2026


The fight against corruption: surat kuning and Article 34(3) – Rocky Bru


A blistering royal warning against corruption has reignited debate over “surat kuning”, with activist Chegubard urging the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be bold in ending political patronage, strengthening MACC independence and upholding the Constitution on royal involvement in businesses




RockyBru
Updated 1 day ago
24 January, 2026
8:00 AM MYT


IF you abuse your power, misappropriate public funds, accept bribes or conspire to protect corruption, you are traitors to the country. – Sultan Ibrahim Iskandar

The King’s message on corruption at Parliament earlier this week is probably the strongest yet on the malaise, but still short of “epic”, says Chegubard, the political activist widely credited for helping expose the latest big corruption cases.

In an open letter to Sultan Ibrahim Iskandar, the 17th Yang Dipertuan Agong, Chegubard said “epic” would be if the King orders civil servants throughout the country to ignore any form of “surat kuning” in the award of government contracts and projects.

“Make all adhere to the process and win on merit,” Chegubard wrote.

Chegubard, whose real name is Badrul Hisham Shaharin, 47, made two more requests to the King: make the MACC answerable directly to Parliament and give precedence to Article 34 (3) of the Constitution, which specifies that the King shall not be actively involved in commercial enterprises.

Excerpts from Chegubard’s open letter on Facebook to the Agong:

“Hamba patik juga merafak sembah, agar dalam kesempatan ini supaya bertitah supaya semua penjawat awam seluruh negara agar menghentikan atau abaikan tekanan amalan konon ada surat kuning dibelakang apa juga keputusan. Semua wajib ikut proses dan kelayakan. Jika DYMM Tuanku bertitah tidak ada lagi surat kuning dalam melobi projek atau kontrak maka itu tindakan berani dan dikenang rakyat.

“Ia satu keberanian yang boleh di katakan epik.

“Satu perkara lagi Tuanku, mungkin Tuanku boleh gunakan kedudukan Tuanku agar mendesak kerajaan meletakkan SPRM dibawah kuasa parlimen atau melapor terus kepada parlimen bagi memperkukuhkan kuasa dan membebaskan SPRM dari dikawal individu atau kelompok.

“Ampun Tuanku.

“Dalam kesempatan ini juga hamba patik mengingatkan diri ini bahawa Raja Raja Melayu ialah institusi penting dalam negara dan ia wajib dipertahankan kesucian dan kehormatannya. Sistem Raja Berpelembagaan ini menjadi tanggungjawab semua mengukuhkan kedaulatannya.

“Menurut Perkara 34 (3) Perlembagaan Persekutuan dinyatakan bahawa “Yang di-Pertuan Agong tidak boleh melibatkan diri secara aktif dalam apa-apa perusahaan komersial”.


Opening the first meeting of the 5th Session of the 15th Parliament on Tuesday, the Yang DiPertuan Agong urged the people to be “the eyes and ears of the nation and report all forms of corruption”. Corruption, he said, must be fought on a massive scale. Those guilty of corruption and those who protect corruption are “traitors to the country”.

As the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, the YDPA was utterly disappointed with the corruption involving high-ranking officials in the army.

Sultan Ibrahim isn’t the only Ruler alarmed by the number of corruption cases that the MACC has unearthed in recent times. In the past week or so, three of Sultan Ibrahim’s brother Rulers have made equally strong remarks on corruption.

Raja Nazrin of Perak, in warning against obsession with wealth, status and power, observed that “society is increasingly ensnared by the pursuit of outward success, often at the expense of moral integrity, spiritual purity, manners, and religious obligations”.

Tuanku Muhriz, the Yang di-Pertuan of Negeri, was shocked by public support for convicted corrupt officials. “(It) reflects not only a failure to grasp the destructive impact of corruption on institutional integrity and society’s moral foundations, but also calls for serious reflection on one’s faith, principles and values.”

Sultan Sharafuddin, lashing out at arge-scale pig farming in Malay/Muslim-majority areas in his state Selangor, wondered aloud if the project served the interests of certain groups of politicians and businessmen, and even alluded to “possible elements of corruption, conflict of interest, or governance lapses in the project’s planning and approval process”. – January 24, 2026



Datuk Ahirudin Attan is the Executive Editor of Big Boom Media that publishes Scoop.my.

This article was first published on Rocky Bru’s blog.


Bersatu hits back: ‘Not meddling in PAS’





Bersatu Information Chief Datuk Tun Faisal Ismail Aziz said the suggestion by Menteri Besar Abu Bakar Hamzah was aimed at resolving administrative issues related to the distribution of allocations to residents in the three affected constituencies. - Scoop file pic, January 25, 2026


Bersatu hits back: ‘Not meddling in PAS’


Tun Faisal says proposal to retain three ex‑PAS reps as independents is to resolve allocation issues, not meddle in party affairs


25 January, 2026
6:00 PM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR – Bersatu has denied that a proposal to retain three former PAS assemblymen in Perlis as independent representatives amounts to interference in PAS’ internal affairs.

Bersatu Information Chief Datuk Tun Faisal Ismail Aziz said the suggestion by Menteri Besar Abu Bakar Hamzah was aimed at resolving administrative issues related to the distribution of allocations to residents in the three affected constituencies.

He explained that the status of the three former assemblymen remains “in limbo” until their court case against the declaration of vacant seats by Perlis Speaker Rus’sele Eizan is concluded.

“This proposal is to determine the position of the three assemblymen so they can continue serving their constituents,” Tun Faisal wrote on Facebook.

“It has nothing to do with PAS’ disciplinary actions against its members. Decisions to expel or suspend members are PAS’ internal matters.”

Ridzuan Hashim, Fakhrul Anwar Ismail and Saad Seman have filed a judicial review against Rus’sele at the Kangar High Court after their constituencies—Guar Sanji, Bintong and Chuping—were declared vacant. Their membership was terminated following allegations they withdrew support for former Menteri Besar Shukri Ramli.

Abu Bakar, who is also Bersatu Perlis chief, said yesterday that the current uncertainty is affecting residents in the three areas, particularly in accessing aid and welfare services.

He expressed hope for a resolution to safeguard political stability and public welfare, suggesting the three former PAS assemblymen be retained as independents and subsequently withdraw their lawsuit against the Speaker.

Following Abu Bakar’s proposal, PAS Information Chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari today responded that “there is no need to interfere in another party’s affairs,” stressing that the trio’s membership ended due to disciplinary breaches under the party constitution.

“The Menteri Besar should focus on governing the state and ensure he does not become the shortest‑serving Perlis MB in history—that’s enough,” Ahmad Fadhli wrote on Facebook. – January 25, 2026


Zahid hopes MIC will stay in BN amid PN speculation





Barisan Nasional chairman Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has expressed hope that MIC will remain within the coalition, saying BN is strongest when its core component parties stay united.– Scoop file pic, January 25, 2026


Zahid hopes MIC will stay in BN amid PN speculation


The BN chairman says the coalition is stronger when its core parties remain united, as MIC weighs its future


Updated 3 hours ago
25 January, 2026
3:09 PM MYT



KUALA LUMPUR – Barisan Nasional chairman Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has expressed hope that MIC will remain within the coalition, saying BN is strongest when its core component parties stay united.

Zahid said BN respected the autonomy of its component members, particularly long-standing parties such as MIC, but stressed the importance of cohesion among the coalition’s founding partners.

“Whatever decision MIC makes is its right, but we hope these core parties will continue to be strengthened,” he told reporters after the groundbreaking ceremony for the QL Innofood Park industrial project in Hutan Melintang in Perak, today.

The deputy prime minister noted that the recent return of the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) had brought the number of BN component parties to five, a development he said would further reinforce the coalition.

“With PPP’s return, BN now has five component parties. This should strengthen the coalition,” he said.

Zahid had announced PPP’s reinstatement at the party’s 72nd annual general assembly on January 18, following Home Ministry approval of its appeal against deregistration by the Registrar of Societies in 2019.

Asked whether he had contacted MIC president Tan Sri S.A. Vigneswaran amid reports the party may join Perikatan Nasional, Zahid said he would not interfere in MIC’s internal affairs.

He said Vigneswaran and MIC representatives were absent from the BN Supreme Council meeting in Kota Kinabalu on January 21 as they were overseas at the time.

“We are confident they will make the right decision for themselves and for the coalition,” he said.

Vigneswaran was reported yesterday as saying MIC would convene an extraordinary general meeting to discuss the party’s official participation in Perikatan Nasional.– January 25, 2026

The politics of smelly animals












Published: Jan 25, 2026 7:00 AM
Updated: 11:43 AM




COMMENT | Mirror, mirror on the wall, which animal is the most “busuk” (smelliest) of them all? This is the sad yet hilarious face of our politics.

The recent brouhaha over pig farming in Selangor led to many social media posts slamming the animals and meat as “smelly and dirty”.

But don't chicken, cow and goat farms also stink? Some people find mutton too pungent to eat as well.

Puncak Borneo MP Willie Mongin responded to the anti-pork side by telling Parliament: “Although pigs are smelly, budu and belacan are worse. But we have never insulted those foods, we practise mutual respect.

“While we do eat pork, many of us don’t take bribes, abuse drugs… But we have been condemned as uncivilised for eating pork.”

His point was that “hati busuk” or hateful minds, plus corruption, are worse than any farm odours.


Puncak Borneo MP Willie Mongin


Willie urged all Malaysians to refrain from mocking the food choices of other races.

I personally love budu, which is fermented anchovy sauce, it adds a real zing to Kelantanese food. And we all love belacan, even though this fermented shrimp paste has a jarring odour.

For me, all “smelly” stuff adds a unique, delicious twist to food, be it petai, durian, salted fish, tempoyak, cincalok, blue cheese, stinky tofu, etc.


Imposing on others

However, imagine a Malay who lives in Europe and fries vegetables with belacan. The neighbouring Caucasian family then lodges complaints against “odour pollution” and demands that he stop. Is it fair for one community to impose their culture on others?

Pigs can actually be very clean and even kept as pets. Actor George Clooney was “inseparable” from his pet pig called Max for 18 years.

It was a beloved companion which Clooney had described as "his longest relationship".

So, just because pork is forbidden to Muslims, is it fair to demand that non-Muslims cannot rear pigs in Selangor? Because they are smelly?

In India, Hindu radicals have beaten up Muslims on suspicion of eating, storing, or transporting beef or cattle.

In the latest of several incidents, on Jan 14, a Muslim youth named Sheikh Makandar Mohammad was driving a van loaded with cattle in Odisha, west India.

He was badly whacked by “cow vigilantes” and later died in the hospital.




The cow is a sacred animal for Hindus, but is it right to demand that Muslims in India cannot be allowed to eat or transport beef? Because it's “sensitive” or “offensive” to the majority?

In a multicultural society, let's learn to live and let live.

The respected former Sarawak chief minister Adenan Satem was reported as saying: “Sarawakians, whether they are Malays, Chinese, Dayak, Bidayuh, they live together, drink together, eat together, find partners together.”

What I admire about Sarawak is that Muslims, Chinese and Dayaks can sit together in a coffee shop. The Muslims eat their halal nasi lemak while the others eat non-halal kolo mee. Everyone is cool.

That's why Sarawak is the model for Malaysian racial harmony.


Cows, goats and pigs

Yes, admittedly, traditional pig farms in coastal Selangor, in Kuala Langat and Sepang, have issues with smell and pollution.

On Jan 10, Selangor ruler Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah said he firmly opposed the renewal of licences for existing pig farms there.

However, are chicken, cattle and goat farms more “fragrant”? Or less dirty? Well, it all depends on how they are managed, right?

Even the cleanest animals will stink if they are not taken care of, and that includes pets. Think about cats in apartments that poop everywhere.

I had a friend who caught leptospirosis after accidentally swallowing river water while doing white-water rafting at Gopeng, Perak.

It's a serious disease from rat urine. Rafting guides told him the source was an unhygienic riverside goat farm.

As for cattle farms, they can spread various diseases to humans, such as Q fever, cryptosporidiosis, salmonellosis, E coli, and brucellosis.

So even farms that supply halal meat can be smelly, cause diseases and taint water. It's all about how they are operated.


Clean modern farming


To solve the problem of polluting pig farms, Selangor wants to relocate them to a modern eco-friendly system at Bukit Tagar to minimise odour, noise and pollution, said Menteri Besar Amirudin Shari.

This means zero waste emission, as everything will be in a closed system. Pig waste will be converted into biogas for electricity generation, explained Izham Hashim, the state executive councillor overseeing agriculture.


Exco member Izham Hashim


He added that the farms will be located away from residential areas and flanked by buffer zones.

For the record, Lam Sai Kit was the scientist who discovered that the Nipah virus from bats in nearby fruit orchards had transferred to pigs to cause a deadly outbreak in 1998.

He supports the Bukit Tagar plan as “modern and centralised pig farming enhances public health”, CodeBlue reported on Jan 23.

Centralised systems allow for engineered wastewater treatment, reducing pollution, he explained. It also allows veterinary disease monitoring and vaccination.

In short, the most reasonable opinion is that we need to clean up pig farming through modern methods, as done in Europe.


Emotional politics

But sadly, pigs and pork have become emotional religious issues, and rational debate starts to break down. Then, political calculations enter.

Perhaps that's why, on Jan 23, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim called for the proposed Bukit Tagar modern farm to either be put on hold or relocated due to “residents’ concerns”.

Yet, “residents’ concerns” have often been ignored when it comes to super high-density condos, local council elections or lately, the imminent destruction of parts of the Ayer Hitam Forest Reserve in Puchong, Selangor.

So, why is Anwar suddenly so sensitive to residents' unease over an eco-friendly pig farm?


Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim


“Even if the technology is the best available, if it causes concern in the area, it should not be allowed to proceed,” Anwar added.

So, it's a big no to modern science and yes to emotional fears and possible loss of votes - when the issue is blown up by the usual suspects.

The reason earlier pig farms could survive was that they were scattered, small-scale operations under the radar. However, that meant a lack of central pollution control.

Whereas Bukit Tagar is a big, integrated operation that invites political attention, like a big red bullseye target.

So, will pig farming in Selangor have to shut down even though a modern, hygienic alternative is available?

Why not just be honest and declare: “Sorry, actually we want to close down all pig farms as the animals and meat are offensive to Muslims, no matter what scientific farming methods are used.”


What’s next?

In 10 or 20 years, what will come next? Will shops be banned from publicly displaying “offensive” roasted pork products such as char siew and siew yuk?

Perhaps, Selangor's pig farms can be relocated to an island far, far away - namely Sarawak - but that will mean higher costs. Maybe we have to import pork from Thailand or faraway Europe and Brazil, even if it goes against local “food security” policy.

Izham underlined that the issue was long-standing and should not be politicised, stressing that the state government’s focus is on resolving pollution and safeguarding community well-being.

That is the right approach. One can only hope that such rational ideas will speak louder than emotional or political panic.

Meanwhile, please stop evoking the ridiculous argument of “busuk”.



ANDREW SIA is a veteran journalist who likes teh tarik khau kurang manis. You are welcome to give him ideas to brew at tehtarik@gmail.com


Greenland imbroglio and Trump's predicament











Hanipa Maidin
Published: Jan 25, 2026 12:34 PM
Updated: 3:34 PM




COMMENT | US President Donald Trump’s insatiable desire for occupying sovereign states has been running wild.

Having illegally captured (read kidnapped) an elected president of Venezuela, his fixation on acquiring Greenland - an autonomous territory of Nato member, Denmark - has escalated into a new transatlantic imbroglio.

So far, Trump has come up with threats of sweeping new tariffs and even taking Greenland by military force. No doubt such threats have rattled the stock market.

Since both the US and Denmark are members of Nato, Article 5 of the Nato charter has been haunting Trump in accomplishing his unhinged mission.

Collective defence is a Nato’s hallmark principle and Article 5 enacts that “an armed attack against one Nato member shall be considered an attack against them all”.

Article 5 is supposed to protect a sovereign territory belonging to Denmark from being invaded by its enemies, not by its own ally.

So, is America obligated to assist Denmark when Greenland is to be invaded by America?




Since 1949, the unwavering pledge has bound together all members of Nato. The UK and Danish Prime Ministers Keir Starmer and Mette Frederiksen, respectively, have recently agreed that security in the Arctic region was a “matter for the entire Nato alliance”.

A basic truism about Greenland must be overlooked, namely, the Greenland Icecap possesses considerable strategic and economic value not only to the controlling power but to the entire free world.

Strategic location

For the last 50 years, climatic changes in its coastal waters have resulted in a rapid development of fisheries utilised by several major powers. It was reported that some significant mining activity had also been undertaken.

The strategic location of the ice continent renders such possession by friendly powers imperative if the western alliance is to remain in undisputed control of the "North Atlantic Life Line”.

Needless to say, other facets such as the fur trade and the importance of its location for meteorological studies have added to Greenland’s significance.




Regardless, international law has duly recognised Denmark's legal right to Greenland. In 1933, the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) ruled in favour of Denmark in its claim against Norway on its sovereignty over all of Greenland, including the disputed eastern part that Norway claimed.

The upshot of PCIJ's decision was that Denmark holds both legal sovereignty and corpus possessionis - physical possession/control - of Greenland.

By the way, PCIJ was the precursor of the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

It is instructive to note that one piece of cogent evidence Denmark used against Norway in PCIJ was a declaration on behalf of the Norwegian government by its then-foreign minister that Norway would not make any difficulty in the settlement of the question of Greenland sovereignty.

The issue in the court then was whether a country was bound by the reply given on its behalf by its foreign minister. The PCIJ answered it in the affirmative.

Batu Puteh case

Such smoking gun evidence reminds me of the Batu Puteh/Pedra Branca case at the ICJ.

One crucial piece of evidence, which Singapore heavily relied upon, was a 1953 letter from the acting state secretary of Johor in responding to Singapore's query about the island's status.


READ MORE: How did Malaysia lose sovereignty of Pulau Batu Puteh?


Singapore forcefully argued that the letter was a form of admission that Johor allegedly relinquished ownership claim of Batu Puteh - indicating Johor's lack of sovereignty claim at the time.


Pulau Batu Puteh


Even though Malaysia subsequently argued that such a damning letter was purportedly unauthorised and ineffective, the ICJ nonetheless found it significant in determining the issue of the actual sovereignty of the island.

Be that as it may, a good lesson to be learned here is that a response by the diplomatic representative of a foreign power would be binding upon the country the minister represents. So, be careful.


HANIPA MAIDIN is a former deputy minister of law.


Why the rush to sack 3 Perlis reps, asks PAS spiritual leader


FMT:

Why the rush to sack 3 Perlis reps, asks PAS spiritual leader


Hashim Jasin says the syura council must be consulted and the decision should not shut the door on repentance


PAS spiritual leader Hashim Jasin said he does not oppose the punishment imposed by the PAS central committee, but believes it was done too hastily.



PETALING JAYA: PAS spiritual leader Hashim Jasin has questioned the haste in terminating the party membership of three former Perlis assemblymen, saying the matter was not referred to the syura council for deliberation.

Hashim said that he did not oppose the punishment imposed by the PAS central working committee, but felt the decision was made too hastily, Utusan Malaysia reported.

He said the syura council would convene soon to deliberate on the appeals submitted by the three former assemblymen — Ridzuan Hashim (Guar Sanji), Fakhrul Anwar Ismail (Bintong) and Saad Seman (Chuping).


“The issue was previously raised briefly at an earlier session, and an upcoming meeting will discuss it more thoroughly and reach a decision,” he was quoted as saying.

Hashim said any disciplinary action should reflect Islamic wisdom and an educational approach when judging wrongdoing, citing an example from the Quran to illustrate his point.

“I would like to give an analogy of a story about a woman who confessed to adultery and asked to be punished by the Prophet Muhammad SAW, but he postponed the punishment several times to safeguard the welfare of the unborn child and the child who was to be born,” he said.

“What does this mean? In Islam, there is just consideration.”

He said PAS leaders should learn from this by not closing the door entirely on repentance or correction.

“Based on that, I suggest that the leadership take heed and avoid finalising a punishment in a way that completely shuts the door on members who wish to repent or correct their mistakes, especially when those involved have dependents,” he said.

Yesterday, PAS assistant secretary-general Syahir Sulaiman said the Perlis trio’s termination of membership was final due to a clause in the party’s constitution passed at last year’s muktamar.

He said the clause stipulates that any termination of a PAS lawmaker’s membership is considered a “final decision”.

The three former assemblymen’s seats were declared vacant after PAS terminated their membership following allegations that they had withdrawn support for then-menteri besar Shukri Ramli.

They have since submitted a formal appeal to the syura council on their PAS membership status, citing provisions under the party constitution.


Selangor govt to discuss PM’s call to cancel Bukit Tagar pig farming plan


FMT:

Selangor govt to discuss PM’s call to cancel Bukit Tagar pig farming plan


State exco Ng Suee Lim says approval for the project has yet to be granted by the Hulu Selangor Municipal Council


Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently called on the Selangor government to cancel its plan to centralise the pig farming industry in Bukit Tagar and find a better location instead. (Reuters pic)



PETALING JAYA: The Selangor state government will hold further discussions on its plan to centralise the state’s pig farming industry in Bukit Tagar after Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim called for the project to be cancelled.

State tourism and local government executive councillor Ng Suee Lim said the state executive council is waiting for menteri besar Amirudin Shari to call for a meeting, Utusan Malaysia reported.

Ng also said that no approval had been granted by the Hulu Selangor Municipal Council for the construction of the centralised pig farm.


“There is no problem. We will discuss it. The issue was only recently raised by the prime minister. However, at the local council level, there has been no progress yet,” he was quoted as saying.

Anwar had called on the Selangor government to cancel its plan and consider a “more appropriate location” for the initiative. He said he would discuss the matter with Amirudin.

This came despite agriculture and food security minister Mohamad Sabu saying the federal government had no objections to the plan, provided the area is deemed suitable from both an environmental and management perspective.

Earlier this month, the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, disagreed with the state government’s plan to centralise the state’s pig farming industry in Hulu Selangor.

While he acknowledged the need for small-scale, controlled farming of pigs to meet the needs of non-Muslims in Selangor, he said large-scale farming was unnecessary and insensitive given the fact that Muslims make up the majority of the Selangor population.

Selangor agriculture committee chairman Izham Hashim had previously said the centralisation of the pig farming industry in Bukit Tagar would ensure the sector is managed cleanly and systematically without affecting the environment or local communities.

Izham said about 202ha in Bukit Tagar, including a buffer zone, had been identified for the purpose, which will see the implementation of a closed farming system with zero emissions.


***


Devolve to Sarawak uninhabited interior, and use technologies as per:

Top Modern and Clean Pig Farm Examples
  • Muyuan Foodstuff (China): Operates the world’s largest pig farm in Nanyang, featuring multi-story, high-rise buildings that house over 1 million pigs to maximize land efficiency and manage waste centrally.
  • "Bajie" Skyscrapers (China): A 26-story, high-rise, vertical farming project in Hubei that keeps pigs in a controlled, clean, and modern industrial environment.
  • Danish Closed-Loop Systems (Denmark): Known for extreme biosecurity, these farms often use automated AI monitoring, advanced air filtration, and strict disinfection procedures, resulting in very low disease outbreaks.
  • Van Veldhuizen Farm (Netherlands): Notable for extreme cleanliness, including easy-to-clean coatings, crystal-clear water, and a zero-tolerance policy for flies.
  • Cargill Global Innovation Center (Netherlands): Part of a global network focused on advanced nutrition and research. 
Key Technologies and Features
  • AI and IoT Monitoring: Cameras, sensors, and AI are used to track health, activity, and environmental conditions (temperature/humidity) in real-time.
  • Vertical Farming: Multi-story buildings are used to concentrate production and minimize land use while keeping the environment sterile.
  • Advanced Waste Management: Waste is often processed into biogas or organic fertilizer.
  • Strict Biosecurity: Technologies like air filtration, automated cleaning, and strict, controlled entry systems prevent the spread of diseases.
  • Automated Feeding: Precision feeding systems provide tailored, consistent nutrition, reducing waste and improving growth rates. 
These modern operations prioritize high-efficiency, disease-resistant environments, with some, like the Chinese vertical farms, even focusing on creating a clean, odorless environment in high-density areas. 



Back off, Perlis MB told after call to reinstate 3 ex-PAS reps


FMT:

Back off, Perlis MB told after call to reinstate 3 ex-PAS reps

PAS information chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari says the disciplinary action taken against the three former assemblymen remains non-negotiable


PAS’s Ahmad Fadhli Shaari (left) said Perlis menteri besar Abu Bakar Hamzah should stay out of the party’s affairs after proposing the reinstatement of three sacked PAS assemblymen as independents.



PETALING JAYA: A PAS leader has pushed back against Perlis menteri besar Abu Bakar Hamzah over his proposal to reinstate three former PAS assemblymen as independents.

PAS information chief Ahmad Fadhli Shaari said Abu Bakar, who is from Bersatu, should focus on governing the state and refrain from interfering in the affairs of other political parties.

“The three former PAS assemblymen had their memberships terminated because they breached party discipline, as clearly stipulated in the party’s constitution.


“PAS cannot compromise on disciplinary issues like this,” he said in a Facebook post today.

“Abu Bakar should just focus on governing the state and make sure he doesn’t end up being the shortest-serving Perlis menteri besar in history.”


Yesterday, Abu Bakar was reported as saying that Ridzuan Hashim (Guar Sanji), Fakhrul Anwar Ismail (Bintong) and Saad Seman (Chuping) should be reinstated as elected representatives, even if they remain as independents.

He said the three still have a mandate to serve their constituents, Utusan Malaysia reported

Their seats were declared vacant after PAS terminated their membership following allegations that they had withdrawn support for then-menteri besar Shukri Ramli.

Fadhli also took a swipe at Abu Bakar by recalling the menteri besar’s own political conduct in November 2023, when he allegedly “declared war” on the Perlis leadership after not being appointed to the state executive council.


“If PAS wants to play politics, the six PAS assemblymen can declare ‘war’ like the menteri besar himself once did,” he said.

“But the thing is, PAS assemblymen are not like the menteri besar. Our party is also not like the menteri besar’s party. The people come first.”

Lim Guan Eng urges overhaul of Sosma after teen girl detained for nine days in Kedah






Lim Guan Eng urges overhaul of Sosma after teen girl detained for nine days in Kedah



Lim Guan Eng said it was “very wrong” for a minor to be held under Sosma for nearly a week, adding that the experience must have been traumatic for the girl and her mother. — Bernama pic

Sunday, 25 Jan 2026 11:41 AM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 25 — DAP veteran Lim Guan Eng has condemned the detention of a 16-year-old girl under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (Sosma), saying the case exposes serious flaws in the law and could have caused lasting trauma to the minor.

The girl was detained in Kedah for nine days from Jan 14 to Jan 23, before being released on Friday, her mother told Free Malaysia Today (FMT).

The incident drew public attention after the mother pleaded for her daughter’s release following her arrest at a roadblock near the Jitra toll plaza.

According to the mother, police flagged down the vehicle in which the teenager was travelling, alleging it was being used to smuggle migrants. The girl, her father and others in the car were then taken into custody.

While in detention, the teen suffered vomiting and developed skin allergies, the mother said, adding that her daughter was so distressed that police allowed her to visit to calm her down.

She also claimed that the girl was placed in a lockup with other adult female detainees and suffered panic attacks, making it difficult for her to sleep.

Lim said it was “very wrong” for a minor to be held under Sosma for nearly a week, adding that the experience must have been traumatic for the girl and her mother.

Under Section 13 of Sosma, bail is generally prohibited for those charged with security offences, with mandatory detention required.

However, Lim pointed out that exceptions exist for persons under 18, women, and those who are sick or infirm.

“Serious questions remain as to why the exception provided under Section 13 was not applied when the 16-year-old girl is not only a minor below 18 but also a woman,” he said in a statement today, describing the incident as unacceptable.

Lim also called for the law to be either abolished or completely overhauled and amended to ensure compliance with the rule of law, due process and constitutional safeguards of human rights.

“The time to do it is now to prevent more abuses of power by the authorities,” he said.

According to FMT, the case was confirmed by Kedah police chief Adzli Abu Shah, while Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said he would look into the detention of the minor.

Rights group Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) also previously called for the girl’s immediate release, saying she should have been dealt with under the Child Act 2017.

Consumers Association of Subang and Shah Alam president Jacob George, who was approached by the mother for help, described the incident as “deeply troubling”.

He said Sosma requires strict due diligence, especially when minors are involved, and urged the home ministry to ensure that minors are placed in halfway homes while investigations are ongoing.