Sunday, May 24, 2026

“So who’s behind Selangor non-Muslims barred from running spiritual centres at shoplots – PKR or DAP?”






“So who’s behind Selangor non-Muslims barred from running spiritual centres at shoplots – PKR or DAP?”




NON-MUSLIMS in Selangor who are still coping to accept pig farming ban in the state has apparently been slapped with another shocker that houses of worships within areas designated as commercial zones are not permitted” given existing buildings cannot be arbitrarily converted into Places of Worship Other than Islam (RISI).


This follows a revelation by Petaling Jaya MP Lee Chean Chung who expressed concerns over several clauses in the recently published Selangor State Planning Guidelines and Standards for Community Facilities that was approved by State EXCO Meeting 34/2025 on Nov 12 last year.


“It is widely known that, for years – due to the shortage of land gazetted for RISI purposes – some religious centres have operated in commercial or industrial areas while generally co-existing peacefully with surrounding communities,” asserted the PKR lawmaker in a Facebook post.

LEE CHEAN CHUNG | 23 May 2026

I am deeply concerned by several clauses in the recently published Selangor State Planning Guidelines and Standards for Community Facilities (Garis Panduan dan Piawaian Perancangan Kemudahan Masyarakat Negeri Selangor) that was approved by State Exco Meeting (MMKN) 34/2025 on 12 Nov 2025.

Paragraph 6 under “KM: 4-3 Places of Worship Other than Islam (RISI)” (Page 51) states that “Placement within areas designated as commercial zones is not permi...

See more

“Rather than intensifying efforts to address the long-standing shortage of land for non-Islamic places of worship, why introduce restrictions on arrangements that have largely not posed problems?”


‘Bureaucratic red tape’


Concern of the former two-term Semambu state assemblyman (2013 to 2022) in Pahang was echoed by political commentator Prof James Chin who lamented that non-Muslim communities are forced into commercial shophouses to gather “simply because they’re frustrated from getting legal permission anywhere else”.

“It’s sad to think that what YB Lee highlighted might actually be true. I hope it’s not true,” the inaugural director of the Asia Institute at the University of Tasmania reacted in a FB post.

😿😿It's sad to think that what YB Lee highlighted might actually be true. I hope it is not true.
Non-Muslim communities are forced into commercial shophouses just to find a place to gather, simply because they are frustrated from getting legal permission anywhere else. The laws and local regulations feel so heavy and restrictive, leaving these crowded, fragile spaces as their absolute last resort.
To even try to operate lawfully, they are burdened with endless paperwork, force...

See more

The laws and local regulations feel so heavy and restrictive, leaving these crowded, fragile spaces as their absolute last resort.

To even try to operate lawfully, they’re burdened with endless paperwork, forced to register with the Registrar of Societies (ROS) and ask local councils for special permission to operate as places of worship.

For non-Islamic faiths in Malaysia, it is a painful, exhausting struggle against mountains of bureaucratic red tape just to establish a simple place to pray.

It hurts to hear the official rhetoric about the government respecting all religions when the crushing reality of the bureaucracy tells a completely different, heartbreaking story.

Veteran journo and columnist Andrew Sia found the entire exercise a politically suicidal cause for the Pakatan Harapan (PH)-rule Selangor state government.

“Non-Muslims can’t have worship houses in Selangor shops, nor convert buildings. Reason given is “better traffic & parking”. REALLY?” the former environmental editor at The Star fumed on his FB page.

Non-Muslims cannot have worship houses in Selangor shops, nor convert buildings. Reason given is "better traffic & parking". REALLY?
Then supermarkets & makan places must also be banned from shops since they attract many cars. Churches operate on Sundays when many other shops are closed, so the traffic reason is not logical. So what's the Real Reason?
The rule is supposedly for "new townships" and land will be provided for non-Muslims. This means Chinese temples, Hindu temples, Sikh Gurdwaras & churches must compete for probably the single non-Muslim space.
Why did the PKR-led state gomen approve this? Did DAP agree? Looks like Pakatan Harapan wants to lose the coming elections.


Then supermarkets & makan places must also be banned from shops since they attract many cars. Churches operate on Sundays when many other shops are closed, so the traffic reason is not logical. So what’s the Real Reason?

The rule is supposedly for “new townships” and land will be provided for non-Muslims. This means Chinese temples, Hindu temples, Sikh Gurdwaras & churches must compete for probably the single non-Muslim space.

Why did the PKR-led state gomen approve this? Did DAP agree? Looks like PH wants to lose the coming elections.


Another testing the waters exercise?

This is when Selangor DAP chairman ng Sze Han stepped in ‘to douse the fire’ that the said PLANMalaysia Selangor’s guidelines “have not yet been implemented or enforced by any local authority”.

“The review of these guidelines will be carried out by the state government in consultation with religious associations,” clarified the Selangor state Investment, Trade and Mobility EXCO in his Non-Islamic Affairs Special Committee co-chairman capacity.

Non-Muslim Places of Worship in Commercial Shoplots

The Selangor State Government wishes to address recent concerns regarding PLANMalaysia Selangor’s guidelines on non-Muslim places of worship, specifically concerning the approval of future applications for non-Muslim places of worship in commercial shoplots.

As such, we wish to clarify that the guidelines have not yet been implemented or enforced by any local authority.

...See more

A meeting will be arranged in early June. No enforcement action will take place while this review is on-going.

The state government is dedicated to resolving this administrative and technical alignment through constructive dialogue, thus ensuring that Selangor remains a progressive, fair and inclusive state for all.

Whether the intention is there or this is purely a proposal, non-Muslims in Selangor surely deserve to know who came out with such brilliant idea so as to facilitate their decision making at the ballot boxes come the next state poll. – May 24, 2026





"Coming soon" to Malaysia





Horrific reaction to brutal public lashing under Syariah law for adultery in Bandar Aceh




CRUEL. Barbaric. Archaic. Those were just some of the sentiments that followed reports of a couple who were subject to severe punishment for the crime of having consensual sex outside matrimony.


Daily Mail's Post


A woman has passed out after she and her partner were lashed 100 times each for sleeping together outside of marriage under an Indonesian province's draconian Sharia laws.
The woman, who was not identified, needed to be carried away after she was publicly caned in Banda Aceh, on the north end of Sumatra island.
A figure dressed head-to-toe in an ominous brown garb with a white mask administered the lashes.
The woman's partner was seen grimacing as he took the punishment.
The couple were two of several people who were punished under Sharia law.
The Banda Aceh Sharia Court and Prosecutor's Office was punishing Sharia violators with between 25 and 100 lashes, including those involved in extramarital romps arranged through online apps.
Unmarried couples are not allowed to sleep together under the harsh laws in the region of Aceh, which is the only place in Muslim-majority Indonesia to administer Sharia law.


As reported by the UK’s Daily Mail, a woman passed out after she and her partner were lashed 100 times each for sleeping together outside of marriage under an Indonesian province’s draconian Syariah laws.

The woman, who was not identified, needed to be carried away after she was publicly caned in Banda Aceh, on the north end of Sumatra island.

A figure dressed head-to-toe in an ominous brown garb with a white mask administered the lashes. The woman’s partner was seen grimacing as he took the punishment.

The couple were two of several people who were punished under Sharia law. The Banda Aceh Sharia Court and Prosecutor’s Office was punishing Sharia violators with between 25 and 100 lashes, including those involved in extramarital romps arranged through online apps.

Unmarried couples are not allowed to sleep together under the harsh laws in the region of Aceh, which is the only place in Muslim-majority Indonesia to administer Sharia law.

The news was also shared on the British tabloid’s Facebook feed, generating 40.2K likes, 13.4K comments and 5.9K shares at time of publication, with many expressing horror at the harshness of the punishment.

The sense of outrage among the western readership was palpable, with many clearly disagreeing that the state should have any say in a person’s personal affairs, especially when it involves consenting adults.

Let the punishment fit the crime. Putting the so-called punishment into perspective, one mortified observer pointed out that the frisky couple did not “steal from anyone” nor did they “murder anyone”.


Arguing that sex outside marriage was also frowned upon in other religions, one commenter felt that the punishment went too far.

Let the person take responsibility for their actions rather than public shaming such as this seems to be the sentiment here.


Let the person who has not sinned cast the first stone. This was the message from a commenter who asked if the executor and, indeed, the accuser had spotless records.

However, there were those who applauded the punishment, seeing it as a deterrent to social ills that stem from “women’s bodies being treated as public property”.


It was argued that critics do not fully understand the merits of Syariah law and therefore should refrain from commenting.

It was also pointed out that the caning in this instance was not the same as those carried out in prison, insinuating that it was a lot less severe.


The difference in ideology is stark, especially to Western perceptions. To those with liberal idealogy, it will seem utterly unacceptable that the authorities have any say in a citizens’ consensual intimate relations.

But to some, it is an acceptable method to control social ills. The hypocrisy of Western media for reporting this instead of other equally shocking news was highlighted as subtle propaganda.

How one views this episode will largely depend on whether a person falls into the ‘liberal’ or ‘conservative’ camp.

The division is stark with nothing in between if the comments in the Daily Mail’s Facebook feed seem to suggest.

In the meantime, lusty lovers in Bandar Aceh best beware as they all know, if caught, the punishment will be severe. —May 24, 2026