Wednesday, December 03, 2025

India to Begin Formal Talks on Procuring Russian S-500 Space Warfare Missile Systems

Military Watch:


India to Begin Formal Talks on Procuring Russian S-500 Space Warfare Missile Systems

South Asia , Missile and Space


Indian media outlets have confirmed that the country’s defence ministry is scheduled to begin formal discussions with Russia regarding the procurement of the S-500 long range air defence system. Talks will begin during a meeting in New Delhi between India's defence minister Rajnath Singh and his Russian counterpart Andrey Belousov December 4. The meeting will also see both sides also review delivery schedules for the S-400 long range air defence system, and further ongoing talks on the possible sale of Su-57 fifth generation fighter aircraft. Russia is scheduled to complete the deliveries of the last of ten battalions’ worth of S-400 systems by November 2026, despite growing demand from the Russian Aerospace Forces for the systems at a time when the country’s defences are under sustained pressure. 

Surface-to-Air Missile Launcher From S-500 Air Defence System
Surface-to-Air Missile Launcher From S-500 Air Defence System

The Russian Aerospace Forces were confirmed in December 2025 to have formed their first full regiment equipped with the S-500, which was the world’s first mobile surface-to-air missile system with the ability to shoot down satellites or intercontinental range ballistic missiles. The system’s very long engagement range of up to 600 kilometres allows it to pose a serious threat to force multiplier assets such as tankers and airborne early warning and control systems that are vital to the functioning of NATO air power. The system can also employ the 40N6 long range surface-to-air missile which the Indian Air Force has already procured to equip its S-400 systems, and combat tested to shoot down a high value Pakistani support aircraft in May deep inside the country’s airspace at a range of over 300 kilometres. The missile type has also been extensively combat tested by the Russian Aerospace Forces to achieve even longer range kills in the Ukrainian theatre.

Missile Launchers From S-400 Long Rang Air Defence System
Missile Launchers From S-400 Long Rang Air Defence System

Indian interest in procuring the S-500 is likely to have been stimulated by multiple factors, one of which is China’s unveiling of the rival HQ-29 system in active service in September. The two are the only systems in the world that provide a mobile anti-ICBM and anti-satellite capability, although the United States is expected to seek to develop similar systems as part of the Golden Dome missile defence program. A further factor is the reported particularly impressive performance of the S-400 during engagements with Pakistani forces in May, contesting sharply to the underwhelming performance of India’s other high profile new air defence asset the Rafale fighter which saw between one and four shot down during the engagements. The underperformance of the Rafale, the which received little comment from Indian officials, served to further raise the perceived importance of the S-400, and is speculated to have also revived interest in procurements of more advanced Su-57 fighters. 

Flight Prototypes Developed For Two Separate Chinese Sixth Generation Fighter Programs
Flight Prototypes Developed For Two Separate Chinese Sixth Generation Fighter Programs

Prime Minister Narendra Modi was among multiple officials who singled out the performance of the S-400 for praise when commenting on hostilities with Pakistan, observing: “Platforms like the S-400 have given unprecedented strength to the country… A strong security shield has become the identity of India.” Indian Air Force Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh in early August observed: “The S-400 system which we had recently bought has been a game changer… The kill range of that system kept their aircraft away from the maximum distance at which they could employ their long-range air-to-ground weapons, like those long-range glide bombs that they have.” The S-500’s capabilities are highly complementary to those of the S-400, and could provide a much needed improvement to air defence capabilities as neighbouring China is poised to begin fielding the world’s first sixth generation fighters from the early 2030s. Even with the Su-57 potentially entering service, the Indian fighter fleet is expected to remain well below parity in its sophistication relative to that of China, which makes the fielding of more advanced air defence systems particularly important to provide an asymmetric defence. 

Trump administration is ‘selling out’ admiral to shield Hegseth over boat strikes, officials say


Guardian:

Trump administration is ‘selling out’ admiral to shield Hegseth over boat strikes, officials say


White House names Adm Frank M Bradley as officer who ‘directed the engagement’, distancing Hegseth from accountability

Joseph Gedeon and agencies
Wed 3 Dec 2025 03.00 AEDT




Officials in Congress and the Pentagon say the Trump administration is attempting to shield Pete Hegseth from responsibility for a “second strike” to kill survivors on an alleged drug boat by scapegoating a US navy admiral instead.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, on Monday explicitly named Adm Frank M Bradley as the officer who “directed the engagement”, distancing Hegseth, the Pentagon secretary, from accountability despite a Washington Post report that he ordered the deaths of everyone on the boat.


“Secretary Hegseth authorised Adm Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes,” Leavitt said, adding: “Adm Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”


The White House statement came after Donald Trump said on Sunday he “wouldn’t have wanted that – not a second strike” when asked about the incident, and claimed Hegseth told him “he did not order the death of those two men”. The president added: “And I believe him.”

The administration’s apparent effort to distance Hegseth from the operation has not flown under the radar for some elected officials.

“He is selling out Admiral Bradley and sending chills down the spines of his chain of command, who now know their boss will sell them out if he is taking heat,” said Chris Murphy, a Democratic senator. “A case study in how not to lead.”

The White House’s legal justification for the strikes, outlined in a classified justice department office of legal counsel opinion reviewed by the Guardian, treats the operations as targeting cocaine rather than people – meaning anyone killed on board should be considered an enemy casualty or collateral damage rather than a murder victim.

The reasoning differs sharply from Trump’s public narrative that the strikes are an effort to stop overdose deaths, rather than attacks on a commodity that finances warfare.


Bradley will provide a classified briefing to lawmakers overseeing the military on Thursday. Bipartisan scrutiny has mounted over a report that Hegseth issued a verbal order in September to strike the vessel, and according to the Washington Post, to “kill everybody”.

Democrats have said the allegations, first reported last week by the Washington Post, could amount to a war crime, and Republicans have also voiced their concerns about the legality of the attack on 2 September.

The House and Senate armed services committees have opened investigations into the recent US military strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean.

In her comments to reporters on Monday, Leavitt did not dispute the Washington Post report that there were survivors after the initial strike.

Bipartisan scrutiny has mounted over a report that Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order to strike the vessel. Photograph: Orlando Barría/EPA


Hegseth posted late on Monday, simultaneously praising the admiral and pointing responsibility in his direction: “Adm Mitch Bradley is an American hero, a true professional, and has my 100% support. I stand by him and the combat decisions he has made – on the September 2 mission and all others since.”

A month after the strike, Bradley was promoted from commander of Joint Special Operations Command to commander of US Special Operations Command.

Concern over the Trump administration’s military strikes against the alleged drug-smuggling boats has been building in Congress, but details of this follow-on strike stunned many lawmakers from both parties and generated stark questions about the legality of the attacks and the overall strategy in the region, particularly toward the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro.


The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week’s Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were sceptical. Still, they said the reported attacking of survivors of an initial missile strike posed serious concerns and merited further scrutiny.

Leavitt said Hegseth had spoken with members of Congress who may have expressed some concerns about the reports over the weekend.

Gen Dan Caine, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, also spoke over the weekend with the two Republican and two Democratic lawmakers leading the Senate and House armed services committees. He reiterated “his trust and confidence in the experienced commanders at every echelon”, Caine’s office said in a statement.

The statement added that the call focused on “addressing the intent and legality of missions to disrupt illicit trafficking networks which threaten the security and stability of the western hemisphere”.

The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said on Monday the second strike was carried out ‘in self-defence’ and in accordance with laws governing armed conflict. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


The Senate majority leader, John Thune, on Monday broadly defended the operations, echoing the Trump administration position that they were necessary to stem the flow of illegal narcotics into the US.

Thune said the committees in Congress would look into what happened. “I don’t think you want to draw any conclusions or deductions until you have all the facts,” he said of the 2 September strike. “We’ll see where they lead.”

After the Post’s report, Hegseth said on Friday on X that “fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland”.

“Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both US and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict – and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command,” Hegseth wrote.

The Senate Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, called Hegseth a “national embarrassment” over his response to critics. Schumer demanded that Hegseth release the video of the strike and testify under oath about what happened.

The Republican senator for Mississippi, Roger Wicker, the chair of the Senate armed services committee, pledged that his panel’s investigation would be “done by the numbers”.

“We’ll find out the ground truth,” he said, adding that the ramifications of the report were “serious charges”.

The 2 September strike was one in a series carried out by the US military in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean as Trump has ordered the buildup of a fleet of warships near Venezuela, including the largest US aircraft carrier. More than 80 people were killed in the strikes.

Chaos has surrounded Hegseth, who has renamed himself the “war secretary”, in his first year on the job. He was outed for sharing sensitive military information about incoming strikes in Yemen on the messaging app Signal, suffered internal feuding among his senior staff, and has encouraged a paranoia-driven hunt for leakers, which have led to multiple top aides being fired.

A former Pentagon spokesman, John Ullyot – who had been a Trump loyalist – wrote in April that the department was experiencing “total chaos” and “full-blown meltdown”, suggesting Trump should consider removing Hegseth.

Trump has repeatedly defended Hegseth, saying this week that he is “doing a great job”.



AGC orders Palapes cadet's death reclassified as murder


The Star:

AGC orders Palapes cadet's death reclassified as murder

Tuesday, 02 Dec 20257:44 PM MYT





KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) has directed that the death of Reserve Officers Training Unit (Palapes) cadet Syamsul Haris Shamsudin be reclassified as murder under Section 302 of the Penal Code for further investigation by the police.

In a statement on Tuesday (Dec 2), the AGC said the decision was made after it was briefed on the findings of the police's investigation into the 22-year-old's death.

"After being briefed and reviewing the investigation report, the AGC has instructed that the case be reclassified under Section 302 of the Penal Code [Act 574] for continued investigation by the police," it said.

Syamsul Haris died on July 28 at Kota Tinggi Hospital in Johor after undergoing training at the Army Combat Training Centre in Ulu Tiram.

He was buried the following day at the Kampung Rinching Ulu Muslim Cemetery in Semenyih, Selangor.

Meanwhile, Bukit Aman CID Director Datuk M. Kumar said the investigation into Syamsul Haris' death would now focus on identifying individuals involved or responsible.

He said the investigation papers would be resubmitted to the AGC for further direction, in line with Article 145 of the Federal Constitution.

"The public is reminded not to speculate while the police complete their investigation, and out of respect for the principles of criminal justice in this country," he said in a statement on Tuesday.

The case was previously classified as a sudden death report (SDR). It was taken over entirely by the Classified Crime Investigation Unit (USJT) of Bukit Aman's Prosecution and Legal Division (D5) on Aug 27, following a Shah Alam High Court order allowing the family's application for exhumation and a second post-mortem.

– Bernama


Why Are So Many Heavy Vehicle Drivers Linked to Drugs or Crime?





OPINION | Why Are So Many Heavy Vehicle Drivers Linked to Drugs or Crime?


2 Dec 2025 • 8:30 AM MYT


TheRealNehruism
An award-winning Newswav creator, Bebas News columnist & ex-FMT columnist



Image credit: Malay Mail


A lorry driver drove 150 kilometres against traffic on the North-South Expressway. Not 15km. Not 50km. One hundred and fifty. In the wrong direction.


According to Hulu Selangor police chief Ibrahim Husin, the driver bolted when officers tried to flag him down near Bukit Beruntung. He sped onto the highway, swerved past oncoming vehicles, and at one point even tried to ram a patrol car, before finally being cornered and arrested. The man later tested positive for methamphetamine and had two prior criminal offences on record.


Shocking? Yes.


Unexpected? Unfortunately, no.


Because we have seen this pattern before.


Recall the horror in Perak earlier this year — nine Federal Reserve Unit personnel killed, crushed in an instant, when a gravel-laden lorry rammed into their truck. The driver in that case, according to Perak police chief Datuk Noor Hisam Nordin, had six criminal records, including drug-related offences.


Then there was the Kajang toll plaza crash, where a lorry ploughed into multiple vehicles, killing a one-year-old child. Kajang police chief Naazron Abdul Yusof confirmed the driver also had multiple criminal records, including for drug-related offences.


Three different cases. Three different tragedies. One unmistakable pattern. All the drivers involved had a history of crime and drug use.


These three cases by the way, are simply the most prominent example of the correlation between lorry drivers in Malaysia with drug use and criminal record. They are by no means, the only examples.


There are so many examples of such a correlation as a matter of fact, that it literally is begging the question "Why do so many heavy vehicle drivers have drug histories or criminal backgrounds?"

When I ask the question to myself at least, only one answer comes to mind:


Is it because people with criminal pasts — especially those with drug records — have almost nowhere else to go?


No employer wants them. No HR department wants the liability. So they end up where society’s refusal to rehabilitate them pushes them:


doing the jobs no one else wants.


Lorry driving might be a physically draining, lonely, poorly paid, and often dependent on impossible delivery deadlines. This might cause some drivers to drive until they literally cannot see straight. Some might speed between destinations because time is money. And some turn to drugs not because they want to get high, but because they are trying to stay awake long enough to survive the day.



What happens when a man who is exhausted, underpaid, and chemically dependent is put behind the wheel of a 10-tonne machine hurtling down the highway?


What happens when they can't find the drugs that is necessary to keep them alert and awake when doing their job?


I don't know which is worse - having a lorry driver who is high on drugs or having one that is driving while having withdrawal issues, because they couldn't find the drug that allows them to cope with the stress of driving a lorry for long hours.


In both cases, I think we might already have found the answers. It is written in the obituaries of the FRU personnel. In the grief of the parents at the Kajang toll plaza. In the sheer terror felt by highway users who see a lorry flying toward them — sometimes in the wrong direction — at dawn.

But this problem is bigger than the drivers. Much bigger.

If these men are desperate enough to take these jobs, then we must also ask:

Are companies quietly exploiting ex-offenders because they can pay them less, push them harder, and get away with it?


Why are enforcement systems so weak that drivers with drug histories, criminal records, or untreated addictions are allowed to operate heavy vehicles capable of killing dozens in seconds, when many of them seem to be still dependent on drugs ? I am not saying that you can't hire a person who used to have a history with drugs to do a job where the lives of many people is in their hands, like that of driving a heavy vehicle on a public road, but isn't the responisble thing to do if you hire such a person, is to at least conduct drug test on the drivers, for at least a couple of years, until you are sure that they are no longer dependent on drugs?

Why are vehicle inspections still spotty, and why are some of these lorries barely roadworthy?


What is it that we think is going to happen when a lorry that is not roadworthy, is driven by a driver that is likely dependent on drugs or suffering from withdrawal symptoms on account of not being able to get their hands on any drugs, while they are likely overworked and on the road chasing a deadline ?


Everyone pretends each new accident is a freak occurrence — a tragedy that “could not have been foreseen”. But the truth is that each of these disasters was foreseeable, because each one fits into a growing pattern that has been staring us in the face for years.


This is not bad luck.


This is not coincidence.


This is a structural failure — in hiring, in enforcement, in rehabilitation, and in oversight.


And unless we address those failures, the next headline — the next viral dashcam video, the next toll plaza tragedy, the next mass funeral — is not a matter of if, but when.


***


Nehru matey, one of your readers wrote in with a 'spot-on' comment. 

LEEKAHPOH63
• 8h
drug to boost stamina to do more trips long time practice by express drivers.

Yes, and that's likely the practice in many countries, even & especially in Australia (a large country) where truck drivers drive long, very very long distances.

It's not correct to say drug addicts apply to drive heavy trucks but rather drivers of heavy trucks travelling long distances involving long stretches of time take drugs to sustain themselves over the long duration of quite strenuous effort.

That's why there's now a law requiring two drivers on each coach for coaches on long distances.

How do we combat such dangerous habits?

Well, ensure the driving effort is not overtaxed through regulations and enforcement. The devil will be in the details, as always.




Tuesday, December 02, 2025

Stop Subsidising B40 Muslims for Hajj





OPINION | Stop Subsidising B40 Muslims for Hajj


2 Dec 2025 • 1:00 PM MYT


Fa Abdul
FA ABDUL is a former columnist of Malaysiakini & Free Malaysia Today (FMT)



Photo credit: Sinar Harian


Every year, without fail, Malaysians talk about the rising cost of living, rising cost of food, rising electricity bills… but when it comes to the rising cost of Hajj, suddenly silence. Suddenly, it’s “Demi Allah, saya reda.”


But this year, something interesting happened: 50% of Malaysians offered Hajj said “No, thank you.” Not because they don’t want to go. Not because they suddenly discovered religious nuance. Nope. Just one thing - money. Cold, hard, very missing money. And honestly? I don’t blame them.


According to Tabung Haji, the cost of Hajj is now RM33,300. If you’re B40, you only need to pay RM15,000 - the rest magically subsidised. Government bagi RM1,000 lagi sebagai bantuan.


M40? You cough out RM23,500. Rest is subsidised.


T20? You kaya, so bayar full price lah.


On paper, this looks “adil”, “memudahkan umat.” But in reality? It reveals how addicted we have become to the idea that Hajj must be done - no matter the cost, no matter the debt, no matter the reality of our own bank accounts.


"Kalau tak mampu, tak wajib"

Here’s the part many conveniently forget - in Islam, Hajj is only obligatory for those who are financially and physically able. It literally says: “Kalau tak mampu, tak wajib.” Simple. Clear. Not complicated.


But try telling Malaysians that - you’ll hear replies like: “Takpe, kita pinjam dulu. Janji sampai Mekah” or “Kalau tak pegi haji, nanti apa orang kata?”


Yes, because nothing screams "spiritual purification” quite like emptying your life savings to stand on Arafah.


We love to talk about niat, ikhlas, pahala, but the moment Tabung Haji announces subsidy figures, everyone turns into Olympic-level mathematicians trying to justify why it makes perfect sense to spend RM15,000 that they don’t have.


And let’s be honest, for many, Hajj stopped being a “once-in-a-lifetime obligation" to those who can afford it. It became a status symbol. A social badge. A spiritual VIP pass.


You know how some people show off their Datuk/Datin pangkat? Same energy - just swap with Haji/Hajjah.


Registering for Hajj with minimum savings


Let’s also talk about the obsession with “first come first serve.” Many young people are encouraged to put their names in the Hajj queue even if they do not have the minimum RM1300 savings in Tabung Haji. Think about that - these young people who are not even trained to save for the future, are being trained to do whatever it takes to take a trip to perform Hajj.

I bet they are advised: “Kalau tak register awal, nanti umur 90 baru dapat pergi.”


As if God is saying, “Sorry bruh, you didn't try hard enough.”


No one seem to care of the truth that if you can’t afford it, you’re not required to go. No sin. No hellfire. No divine penalty. Islam literally gives you a pass.


But for Malaysians, we don’t like passes. We like pressure.


We like turning religion into performance art. We like comparing who went Hajj, who went Umrah, who went berapa kali, siapa dapat lounge Al-Safa, siapa selfie depan Kaabah paling aesthetic…


Dear Tabung Haji, why?


And here’s the part that really makes me raise an eyebrow. Surely Tabung Haji knows Hajj is NOT obligatory for those who cannot afford it. It’s literally Religion 101. So why do we even have a special category for the B40?


Why are the poorest Malaysians being encouraged to “take the offer,” when they still have to cough up RM15,000?


Let’s be realistic. RM15,000 isn’t “sikit je.” That’s RM1,250 a month, for every month of the year.


For families with little to spare, that kind of money could cover groceries, medical bills, children’s needs - or simply serve as emergency funds so they don’t fall into deeper hardship.


So why push them? Why present Hajj like something the B40 should aim to squeeze themselves into, instead of honouring the principle that if you can’t afford it, it isn’t required?


It almost feels like somewhere along the way, Tabung Haji shifted roles - from a body that guides the ummah, to a body that gently nudges people into believing Hajj is some kind of national KPI.


Why make something not compulsory feel increasingly essential?


Why create tiers like it’s some spiritual version of Astro subscription - B40 package, M40 package, T20 premium?


Dear Government, you pun sama!


And here’s the irony that really hits the spot: Why is the government subsidising B40 and M40 Malaysians to perform Hajj when the same government has already classified them as struggling households - so much so that they’re given Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah of up to RM200 a month just to survive?


In other words, the government gives B40 RM200 a month to help buy basic groceries for their survival… but somehow expects them to come up with RM1,250 a month for a religious ritual that isn’t even obligatory?


Bruh, make it make sense please.


If religion says “no need if you can’t afford,” but the system says “takpe, kita try juga,” then someone, somewhere, is encouraging a mindset that contradicts the very foundation of the obligation.


And that’s the real problem - not that Malaysians can’t afford Hajj, but that they’re made to feel like they must.


Now… if only someone with 
actual balls would dare bring this up in Parliament…


DAP’s Sabah defeat: Understand and learn from this, says veteran party leader


theVibes.com:

DAP’s Sabah defeat: Understand and learn from this, says veteran party leader


It is not just the losses, but the slide in majority margins, which is also startling to the socialist party.

Updated 7 hours ago · Published on 02 Dec 2025 10:08AM


Chow said that DAP accepts the verdict of the voters and hopes to rebound soon. - December 2, 2025



by Ian McIntyre


VETERAN DAP leader Chow Kon Yeow hopes the party can learn fast from the outright rejection by voters in the recent Sabah state election.

DAP for the first time since 2004, will not have any political representation in the second biggest state in Malaysia after eight of its candidates were whitewashed in the recent Sabah state election.

And it is not just the losses, but the slide in majority margins, which is also startling to the socialist party.

Chow, who leads the DAP-bastion Penang national unity government, said that main factors need to be considered when the national DAP conducts its post-mortem after the party’s total rejection in the 17th Sabah election.

What strikes his mind is a perception that the government is not doing enough to curb corruption or an abuse of power; it has led voters to take a different stand and reject Pakatan Harapan (PH), the lynchpin behind the national unity government.

“The most critical issue is the scepticism towards the Government’s efforts to curb corruption, abuse of power and other issues within the administration, which has led people to feel the need to take a stand," said Chow after opening an event here.

"It is not only DAP which fared badly, PH also didn't do well."

Although Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has demonstrated strong leadership internationally and ensured the nation’s finances have stabilised since taking over the administration, this still appears insufficient, said Chow.

“There are many issues that remain, especially the cost of living. Although much has been done, it continues to be a major concern among voters.

Chow said that DAP accepts the verdict of the voters and hopes to rebound soon.

There are speculations that the next general election may be held by early 2027.

Chow stressed the importance of understanding the voters’ message, the lessons that must be drawn from this setback, and how the party should chart its direction.

He added that what happened in Sabah was not a question of candidate suitability, as all eight candidates, including incumbents and a state cabinet minister, were defeated.

“We need to take note of the total rejection of DAP in the Sabah election and its implications," said Chow, who is a DAP central committee member, and a former vice-chairman.

A former political secretary to DAP founder Tan Sri LIm Kit Siang, Chow noted that none of the DAP candidates were seen as corrupt, yet they were rejected.

Meanwhile, former PKR deputy secretary-general S. Raveentharan urged PH to go back to its roots as a reformist - minded movement.

"We got popular votes because we knew then that reforms are the only way to salvage the country from savages of corruption, cronyism and nepotism."

But PH seems to have lost its way since 2020, and over time, support has eroded despite the impressive records such as high rate of investments, said Raveentharan.

Being part of the national unity coalition may impede the reform agenda but the effort to maintain reforms, must be convincing enough for voters to buy into it.

"Now, it remains a lukewarm initiative and the messaging for reforms has weakened in the face of global politics such as ASEAN and US tariffs. We need more attention on the domestic front if the Sabah outcome is to be learnt," he said. - December 2, 2025


Rafizi: Anwar Wants to Make Nurul Izzah Selangor MB





OPINION | Rafizi: Anwar Wants to Make Nurul Izzah Selangor MB


2 Dec 2025 • 12:30 PM MYT


TheRealNehruism
An award-winning Newswav creator, Bebas News columnist & ex-FMT columnist



Image credit: Utusan


When Rafizi Ramli speaks, the political world pays attention. And his latest revelation is perhaps his most explosive yet: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim allegedly attempted a covert plan in April 2024 to bring Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz into PKR, trigger two strategic by-elections, and pave the way for Nurul Izzah Anwar to become the next Selangor Menteri Besar.


The entire sequence of events was laid out in detail when Rafizi described how Anwar intended to unveil Zafrul’s entry at the PKR congress and subsequently orchestrate a parliamentary by-election for Zafrul and a state by-election for Nurul Izzah — a plan dismantled only because the details leaked early and triggered fierce objection from UMNO.


How the Plan Was Supposed to Work

Stage 1: Zafrul enters PKR

Anwar was reportedly preparing to make Zafrul’s entry a signature announcement at the party congress.

Stage 2: Two simultaneous by-elections

One for Zafrul to secure a parliamentary seat, and another for Nurul Izzah to return to the Selangor State Assembly.

Stage 3: Replacing the sitting Selangor Menteri Besar

With both in place, Zafrul’s position would help consolidate support for Nurul Izzah to replace Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari as Selangor’s leader.


Rafizi said the plan was pushed aggressively, with Anwar becoming upset when senior party figures disagreed — even though the matter had never been formally discussed in the leadership council.

But the scheme collapsed before it could be launched.


The Leak and UMNO’s Fury

The plan was derailed when someone inside Anwar’s own circle leaked it.

Rafizi revealed that internal factions accused one another of being responsible for exposing the strategy, which then caused UMNO to object sharply to PKR’s attempt to recruit Zafrul, who was still associated with the party at the time.

Caught off-guard by the premature exposure and mounting pressure, Anwar aborted the entire announcement.


Meanwhile, Amirudin Quietly Floated Nurul Izzah as a Successor

In a separate political twist, Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari later acknowledged that he had personally suggested Nurul Izzah could succeed him as Selangor MB — arguing it could provide her administrative experience and reduce possible accusations of nepotism at the federal level.

Amirudin even said he had spoken to Nurul Izzah about the idea directly, and emphasised that it was up to her whether to pursue it.

This suggestion, coupled with Rafizi’s revelations, paints a picture of a broader, longer-term effort to position Nurul Izzah in Selangor.


Anwar Publicly Denies Knowing Anything

When asked about Amirudin’s comments and the idea of Nurul Izzah being floated as a successor, Anwar dismissed it entirely as merely the MB’s personal view. He also said he was unaware of any intention by Amirudin to shift to federal politics.

“Nobody discussed it with me,” the prime minister told reporters after attending a dinner at the Sandton Hotel with the Malaysian diaspora in South Africa.

Pressed on Amirudin’s readiness to assume federal duties, Anwar replied: “When is the next (general) election? A long time more, so we’ll discuss this later.”

He insisted that no one had discussed the matter with him.

This denial now sits uncomfortably alongside Rafizi’s detailed description of a coordinated succession plan.


A Window That Has Now Closed

Even though Zafrul eventually did join PKR, Rafizi stressed that the original plan is no longer feasible. Under state law:if a Selangor state seat becomes vacant within two years of the assembly’s expiry in September 2028, no by-election is required.

This means the opportunity to create a state seat for Nurul Izzah through a by-election has vanished — shutting down the most crucial step of the plan.


What This Entire Saga Reveals About PKR

This episode uncovers deeper dynamics within PKR:

1. Leadership decisions occurring outside formal party structures

If the plan existed as described, major strategic moves were being devised privately, not through party consensus.

2. Internal factions willing to sabotage each other

The leak suggests deep mistrust and power struggles within PKR’s upper ranks.

3. Selangor as the strategic heart of PKR’s future

Control of Selangor is not just administrative — it is political capital.

4. The unavoidable shadow of political dynasties

Even if framed as meritocratic, any move involving Nurul Izzah will inevitably be scrutinised for signs of familial influence.

Conclusion: The Plan Is Dead — But the Political Fallout Is Just Beginning

The failed Zafrul–Nurul plan might have been buried in 2024, but its echoes will reverberate through PKR for years:

  • It raises uncomfortable questions about decision-making under Anwar’s leadership.
  • It intensifies speculation about Selangor’s political future.
  • It reignites debates about dynastic politics in Malaysia.

And most importantly, it reveals a party fractured by suspicion, ambition, and competing visions for what comes after Anwar.


12 GRS reps holding Sabah govt 'ransom' over state cabinet line-up?











12 GRS reps holding Sabah govt 'ransom' over state cabinet line-up?



Published: Dec 2, 2025 2:16 PM
Updated: 5:51 PM



Sabah’s post-election calm is fraying barely a day after the new cabinet was unveiled, with a dozen Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) assemblypersons and a handful of independents signalling open resentment over the composition of the state government.

What began as muted grumbling in private WhatsApp groups has spilt dramatically into the open, with several lawmakers effectively holding the Chief Minister Hajiji Noor-led administration ransom, by airing threats, frustrations, and political warnings online.

At the heart of their anger is the inclusion of national party leaders in the cabinet.

Umno’s Jafry Ariffin was appointed Sabah tourism minister, while PKR’s Jamawi Ja’afar was given the state agriculture portfolio.

For leaders who had spent the entire campaign rallying around the slogan “rumah kita, kita jaga, (our home, we manage)”, the appointments were quickly interpreted as a betrayal of the promise to build a Sabahan-led government free of national party influence.


CM Hajiji Noor


Several disgruntled assemblypersons have allegedly privately said the coalition is now “compromised”, arguing that the “Sabah first” message has been diluted, the moment national figures were placed in key portfolios.

Adding to their frustration is the recent behaviour of certain BN leaders, particularly Lamag assemblyperson Bung Moktar Radin, who publicly called the former GRS government “a failed government” during the Sabah election campaign.

Apart from the 12 GRS assemblypersons, five independents - Maijol Mahap, Jordan Angin, Rina Jainnal, Fairuz Renddan, and Awang Ahmad Sah Sahari - are understood to be aligned with the dissatisfied group, giving the rebellion the potential to snowball into a sizeable parliamentary-style faction inside the state assembly.


Masiung goes public, others simmer

From the GRS side, Malaysiakini was able to identify some of the assemblypersons, including Masiung Banah of Kuamut, Ruddy Awah of Pitas and Isnin Aliasnih of Klias.

More names are circulating in internal chats, but the three above are the only ones verified through their own posts or through multiple divisional sources.

Masiung made little effort to hide his resentment. On his official media page, he wrote: “Twelve GRS held constituencies are now potential by-election seats, including Kuamut.”



Kuamut assemblyperson Masiung Banah


On his personal Facebook page, he added: “I will call a press conference very soon.”

Both posts were widely circulated, fuelling speculation that several assemblypersons may be contemplating mass resignations or at least using that threat to negotiate for cabinet-level placements.

However, under Sabah’s anti-party hopping law, Masiung’s claim of an automatic by-election is not entirely accurate, since a GRS assemblyperson who withdraws support from the chief minister does not lose his seat unless he resigns from his party.


Isnin walked out of Istana meeting?

One viral message, believed to have originated from a divisional GRS WhatsApp channel, claimed that Isnin walked out of Istana Seri Kinabalu when the cabinet list was being finalised.

Meanwhile, a photo of the disgruntled group having dinner together at a hotel went viral overnight, inviting new rounds of speculation.





When one of them was asked what the meeting was about, the reply was brief: “We are just having coffee.”

Malaysiakini has not independently verified all claims. Attempts by Malaysiakini to contact the disgruntled assemblypersons were ignored, with several choosing instead to express their anger through vague Facebook captions, WhatsApp status updates, and forwarded screenshots.

Long-time political observers say this pattern usually indicates coordinated pressure, a precursor to bargaining for positions in a still fluid administration.


‘Use proper channels if dissatisfied’

Last night, GRS deputy secretary-general Armizan Ali issued a sharp reminder that governance cannot be dictated through anonymous WhatsApp forwards or cryptic online statements.


GRS deputy secretary general Armizan Ali


Without naming individuals, Armizan said the coalition “will not be swayed by threats circulated through WhatsApp groups or indirect political messaging.”

He urged dissatisfied assemblypersons to raise concerns through formal channels, stressing that forming a government required political sacrifice and that not every constituency could be represented in the first round of cabinet appointments.

Armizan warned that online agitation risked “undermining public confidence and destabilising a government that has only just begun its work.”

He also rejected claims that the inclusion of national party leaders compromised GRS’ “Sabah first” framework, arguing that the wider political arrangement was necessary to secure a functioning and stable government.

For now, the revolt appears to be only on the digital front. No assemblypersons have formally quit GRS, declared independence, or withdrawn support.

But the open dissatisfaction suggests deeper tension within the coalition, particularly over identity, representation and the meaning of the “Sabah first” politics now that national parties occupy key ministries.

Hajiji commands at least 46 assemblypersons, but if the disgruntled GRS dozen and five independents withdraw support, his numbers would plunge below the 37-seat threshold, placing the administration at risk of collapse.

Most of the dissatisfaction erupted online last night, but none of it has translated into action yet.


***


Warisan waiting patiently like Sang Buaya, wakakaka


DAP must push to correct Madani’s glacial reformasi course


FMT:

DAP must push to correct Madani’s glacial reformasi course


DAP must tell Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to speed up the implementation of reforms





From Terence Netto

Its wipeout in the Sabah polls has made it imperative for DAP to push for a course correction by the Madani government of which it has been an integral, if passive, part.

Having lost all eight seats it contested in the Sabah polls – an unprecedented failure – DAP cannot avoid drawing an adverse conclusion.

This is that urban Chinese voters, usually the mainstay of its support, no longer view the party as a political force they can rely on to defend their interests.

Three years ago, when DAP backed Anwar Ibrahim to the hilt as its choice for prime minister of the unity government, it virtually gave him a blank cheque.

That action reflected the trust and confidence that the party – the largest component of the Madani government in terms of parliamentary seats (40) – had in Anwar to bring about the political and economic reforms that Pakatan Harapan (PH) had espoused for nearly three decades prior to its assumption of federal power in late November 2022.

The party was virtually telling him it knew the constraints within which he had to manoeuvre as head honcho of the unity government, which included DAP’s adversary, Umno.

Nevertheless, DAP felt assured that Anwar would know what was to be done and when it was to be done.

It was a matter of trust.

Signs that this trust was beginning to fray were discernible a year ago at a large gathering of DAP supporters in Ipoh, at the launch of the Mandarin edition of journalist-author Kee Thuan Chye’s two-volume biography of Lim Kit Siang.

Anwar was guest of honour at the function.

All eyes were on the prime minister and what he was going to say in the face of growing unease among many at the slow pace of reforms since attaining his lifetime ambition to be prime minister.

The final speaker on the occasion, Anwar referred to the French Revolution, on how the seminal event was a lesson that radical reform was best taken in small doses lest reactionary forces arise to wipe out long-sought gains.

Anwar did not appear very convincing, and his comportment suggested he was irked by remarks from DAP stalwart Lim Guan Eng earlier in the evening that purported to tell Anwar to step on the gas.

In fact, Shamsul Iskandar Akin, then political secretary to the prime minister who was sitting at the press table, muttered his disapproval of Guan Eng’s seeming temerity.

Suffice to say, just two years after Anwar assumed the reins of power, the tardy pace of reforms by his administration was already taxing the patience of PH supporters.

Now, three years after, with the dismal results for PH components in the Sabah polls, the message from voters cannot be misread.

It’s get on with the reform programme or pay the forfeit at GE16, which must be held by February 2028.

PH components Amanah and PKR cannot be expected to prod Anwar to get going on reform; one is too feeble to exert pressure and the other has become a family concern.

It’s up to DAP to take the bit between the teeth and tell Anwar it’s now or never.

Voters will not give Madani another chance.



Terence Netto is a senior journalist and an FMT reader.


The football meeting that blows open the Haresh Deol assault


FMT:

The football meeting that blows open the Haresh Deol assault


Seven days on, one overlooked detail unsettles official narratives





Today marks one week since journalist Haresh Deol was beaten in broad daylight in Bangsar, yet the story has shifted more than the facts.

First, the police said it was “personal”. Then it became “mistaken identity”.

Now a previously unreported detail complicates both versions: minutes before the attack, Haresh had walked out of a 2pm meeting at Alexis Bistro with several figures linked to the national football scene.

He left the Jalan Telawi outlet around 3.25pm. The assault followed within minutes. That window is too tight to ignore.

Earlier that afternoon, Haresh knowing there were two Alexis outlets in Bangsar phoned his contact to confirm which one.

Yet the attackers seemed to know precisely where he would be and were already in position.

He was approached almost immediately after exiting, attacked in a swift, coordinated manner, and left on the ground while his belongings remained untouched.

Nothing suggests opportunism. Everything suggests a target.

It is learnt that the man who pleaded guilty admitted he did not know Haresh and expected payment.

He said a long-time friend had instructed him, alleging Haresh harassed his wife.

It is also understood he did not travel to Bangsar on his own; someone picked him up, provided transport, and told him to ride the bike.

That sounds like coordination, not spontaneous anger.

Yet police floated the “personal” angle early on, apparently relying mostly on the attacker’s unverified claim.

Such a characterisation shapes public perception and can shadow the victim.

Haresh, married to fellow journalist Pearl Lee, has categorically denied any knowledge of the alleged dispute.

No evidence has been presented publicly to support the claim.

So key questions arise: Was the allegation checked before it was aired? Was any link established between the alleged couple and Haresh?

And if not, why was a damaging insinuation allowed to circulate?

The storyline has since shifted to “mistaken identity”. But that raises deeper uncertainties.

If he was not the intended target, then who was?

And how does “mistaken identity” sit alongside accounts that one attacker appeared to know Haresh’s vehicle and movements?

Who exactly was being watched that afternoon, and by whom?

A third individual, described by a witness as a Malay male calmly recording the assault, remains unidentified.

There is no public confirmation that investigators have secured his mobile phone, a potentially crucial source of evidence. That is not a small omission.

What happened around that table?

Equally important is what happened before the assault. The Alexis meeting remains an unaddressed piece of the puzzle.

Have police:

  • Reviewed CCTV from inside Alexis and along Jalan Telawi?
  • Spoken to everyone at that meeting?
  • Determined whether Haresh was watched or followed from inside or outside the premises?

These are not speculative leaps. They are essential steps when timing is this precise.

The broader context matters too. Haresh has published critical reporting on governance and decision-making in Malaysian sports, including football administration and the naturalisation of foreign-born players.

His work has reached corners of the system that prefer shadows.

No one has established a link between his journalism and the attack, but any serious investigation must consider whether threats, warnings or patterns of intimidation existed.

As things stand, the public must reconcile several stark facts:

  • One man has pleaded guilty to a paid assault and is now on bail.
  • Two accomplices remain unaccounted for.

The motive has pinballed from “personal” to “mistaken identity”.

And a meeting minutes before the attack, attended by figures tied to the football landscape has barely been acknowledged.

Fear and uncomfortable questions

Through all this, Haresh, a seasoned journalist and family man, is now forced to think about the safety of his loved ones and himself.

With accomplices still out there, one assailant admitting to acting for money, and the motive unresolved, that fear is not abstract. It is rational.

This is no longer just about a brutal battering in Bangsar.

It is about whether the authorities are willing to confront inconvenient questions, avoid premature labels, and follow the evidence wherever it leads, even if that path unsettles familiar comfort zones.

“Personal” or “mistaken identity” cannot stand as throwaway explanations.

They shape investigative direction, influence public understanding, and carry real consequences for the victim.

Until the questions surrounding the Alexis Bistro meeting, the unidentified accomplices, and the true motive are addressed openly and thoroughly, this case cannot be considered close to resolution.

A week on, it remains incomplete. It remains troubling.

And it demands far more than silence.


Sabah Cabinet intrigue deepens as 17 assistant ministers and six assemblymen sworn in without portfolios






Sabah Cabinet intrigue deepens as 17 assistant ministers and six assemblymen sworn in without portfolios



In an official statement today, seventeen assistant ministers and six nominated assemblymen were sworn in at Istana Seri Kinabalu, but their ministries were not named. — Bernama pic

Tuesday, 02 Dec 2025 6:45 PM MYT


KOTA KINABALU, Dec 2 — In an official statement today, seventeen assistant ministers and six nominated assemblymen were sworn in at Istana Seri Kinabalu, but their ministries were not named.

The statement specifically stated the list included Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) and Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku (STAR) and independent assemblymen only.

The four independent assemblymen named – Pintasan assemblyman Datuk Fairuz Renddan; Kukusan assemblyman Datuk Rina Zainal; Bandau assemblyman Datuk Dr Maijol Mahap; Tulid assemblyman Jordan Jude Ellron – were part of the GRS coalition prior to nomination day.

They were among the 12 or so assemblymen who were reported to be unhappy with the inclusion of Barisan Nasional in the government yesterday.


STAR’s Bingkor assemblyman Mohd Ishak Ayub, who is also Sabah Governor Tun Musa Aman’s nephew, was a “direct” appointment, which will see his party remain in the opposition.

Topping the list of the 17 assistant ministers sworn in today was Gabungan Rakyat Sabah information chief and Kiulu assemblyman Datuk Joniston Bangkuai, followed by Pitas assemblyman Datuk Seri Ruddy Awah, Klias assemblyman Datuk Isnin Aliasnih, Labuk assemblyman Datuk Samad Jamri, Kuala Penyu assemblyman Datuk Limus Jury, and Lumadan assemblyman Datuk Ruslan Muharam.

They were also among those who were reportedly disappointed with the decision to include BN in the fold.


Completing the 17 are Tandek assemblyman Datuk Hendrus Anding, Telupid assemblyman Datuk Jonnybone J. Kurum, Limbahau assemblyman Datuk Juil Nuatim, Tanjung Kapor assemblyman Datuk Ben Chong, Tanjong Batu assemblyman Dr Andi Md Samsureezal, and Datuk Ceasar Mandela Malakun.

They took their oath of office before the Tuan Yang Terutama. Also present were Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor and members of the newly-appointed Sabah State Cabinet.

The ceremony also gave out letters to six nominated assemblymen: Mandela, who will use the appointment to serve as an assistant minister; former Sabah Law Society (SLS) president Datuk Roger Chin; PGRS’s secretary general Datuk Mohamed Razali Mohamad Razi; chief minister’s chief political secretary Datuk Haji Abdul Kassim Razali; Liberal Democratic Party secretary general Datuk Ir Chin Shu Ying; and PKR division chief Grace Lee Li Mei.

The list means that Barisan Nasional has only one representative – Sabah Umno secretary Datuk Jafry Arifin who was given the Tourism, Culture and Environment minister post. BN component Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah president Datuk Arthur Kurup and Parti Kesejahteraan Demokratik Malaysia’s sole representative Datuk Rusdin Riman was also left out of the fold.

Many are speculating that they will be offered posts in government-linked companies and other government agencies instead.


***


Frogs galore, wakakaka