Wednesday, July 08, 2026

Netanyahu’s Christian comments ‘aimed at sowing strife’: Lebanese analysts




Netanyahu’s Christian comments ‘aimed at sowing strife’: Lebanese analysts

After Netanyahu’s statements on Lebanese Christians were denounced in Lebanon, analysts call Israel’s PM a liar.

Beirut, Lebanon – A number of Lebanon’s Christian villages released a statement on Monday, refuting claims by Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that they had requested Israeli annexation.

“Christian villages in Lebanon, some of them have actually asked to be annexed to Israel, because we protect them against Hezbollah, Hezbollah fanatics who want to kill them, and we do the same things with Christians everywhere,” Netanyahu had told the Fox News programme The Sunday Briefing the day before the villages responded.

Israel currently occupies around 6 percent of Lebanese territory, despite claiming in the recent Lebanon-Israel framework agreement that it has no territorial ambitions in the country.

Lebanese analysts and southern Lebanon residents also lambasted Netanyahu’s claims, with some using colourful language.

“[Netanyahu’s claims] reflect his cynicism and the fact that he’s a pathological liar,” Karim Emile Bitar, a professor of international relations at the Saint Joseph University of Beirut, told Al Jazeera. “Several Lebanese MPs and government officials called every single mayor of all towns in south Lebanon, and there is absolutely no truth in these statements. It is completely a fabricated claim.”

Officials in 15 towns in southern Lebanon with Christian populations issued the statement denouncing what analysts said was an effort by Netanyahu to inspire sedition and strife between Lebanese.

Division over Hezbollah but rejection of Israel

Netanyahu’s comments come on the back of a highly criticised, US-brokered agreement between Lebanon and Israel aimed at ending Israel’s war on Lebanon.

The latest round of fighting intensified on March 2, when Hezbollah fired six rockets at Israeli targets for the first time in more than a year, and Israel responded by increasing attacks across the country, including the capital Beirut, and invading southern Lebanon.

In recent months, Israel has attracted international criticism for indiscriminate attacks on Lebanese targets, including incidents involving Christians. Most notably, an Israeli soldier sparked global uproar when he smashed a Jesus statue in south Lebanon in April, while in early March a priest was killed by Israeli tank fire in south Lebanon. Additionally, an official of a Christian party was killed in early April in an eastern suburb of Beirut.

“Christian villages along the border have been affected by the war,” Nasser Khdour, Middle Eastern assistant research manager at Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, a US-based nonprofit that maps political violence, told Al Jazeera. “ACLED data shows that Christian villages were targeted by air strikes and artillery shelling. Civilians were killed, and civilian infrastructure was damaged.”

Khdour said ACLED has recorded property destruction incidents in Rachaya al-Fakhar, Debel, and Aalma Ech Chaab municipalities, all of which have significant Christian populations. In Debl, seven property-destruction incidents were recorded, including the vandalism of the Jesus Christ statue.

2:15
Lebanon latest: Teacher killed by Israeli airstrike

Behind Netanyahu’s comments

Lebanon’s political representation is divided along sectarian lines, with the leadership split between a Maronite Christian president, a Sunni Muslim prime minister, and a Shia speaker of parliament. A sectarian quota also exists for Lebanon’s parliament, and sect is also a consideration when assigning government ministerial posts.

Some analysts believe Netanyahu and the Israeli government are trying to amplify tensions within Lebanon’s sectarian system with the goal of creating internal conflict, at a time when the security framework signed between Lebanon and Israel is under growing scrutiny.

During the latest intensification of Israeli attacks, more than 1.2 million people were displaced from their homes. The majority are Shia Muslims who were forced to find refuge in areas with different sectarian makeups, at times leading to fears that communal tensions might boil over into violence.

“This seems to be clearly intended to sow civil strife in Lebanon, to pit the Lebanese against one another to promote this idea that Israel could be a protector of certain minorities to play on the existential angst of Lebanese southerners,” Bitar said. “It’s a decades-old divide-and-conquer strategy, part of an Israeli strategy.”

For the most part, those tensions have not yet culminated in violence. The country is, however, deeply divided on the role of Hezbollah and the issue of its weapons and armed resistance. Despite that division, Lebanese people still overwhelmingly view Israel in a negative light.

“While Christian villages and parties oppose Hezbollah’s policies, that does not mean they want to be part of Israel,” Nasser Khdour, Middle Eastern assistant research manager at Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, a US-based nonprofit that maps political violence, told Al Jazeera. “In Rmeish, for example, residents protested during the war and called for the Lebanese army to stay in the town.” Rmeish is a town on the Lebanon-Israel border.

3:23
Israeli air strikes kills at least four in southern Lebanon despite ‘ceasefire’

A June 2026 poll conducted by Lebanese American University professor Jad Melki backs up this sentiment. Out of 1,000 people polled, 54 percent agreed diplomacy is the only path to liberation, while 35 percent supported armed resistance as the only path.

And while about a third of the people polled supported a peace agreement with Israel (34 percent), 87 percent agreed with the view that Israel is an enemy of the Lebanese.

Divide and conquer

Lebanese officials also spoke out strongly against Netanyahu.

Melhem Khalaf, a Greek Orthodox MP from Beirut, gave a news conference on Monday where he said that Netanyahu “does not have the right to speak on behalf of Christians”.

Hanna al-Amil, the head of the majority Christian municipality Rmeish, told local newspaper L’Orient-Le Jour, “No village in the South has made such a request.”

2:27
Lebanese families from occupied village cling to hope of returning home

The strategy of Israel trying to divide and conquer minorities in the region is not new, analysts said. Israel has claimed it wants to play a similar role in Syria, particularly in the Suwayda region, after sectarian violence shook the Druze community there last year. Israel then bombed Damascus in what it said was an effort to defend the Druze community.

“The fact that most Lebanese living in those villages in the south also were shocked and released statements, firmly denying this was quite significant, but it should not be taken lightly because it is part of a wider Israeli strategy,” Bitar said.

“There is a need for all Lebanese to remain united and remain determined to nip in the bud all Israeli attempts to sow civil strife in Lebanon,” he added.

3:39
Israeli strikes hit Nabatieh in southern Lebanon amid fragile ceasefire

US says strikes launched as explosions heard in southern Iran

 



US says strikes launched as explosions heard in southern Iran

The US military says it has launched airstrikes against Iran as explosions were reported in several locations in the south of the country.

The US Central Command (CENTCOM) said the strikes began on Tuesday, and are being conducted “in response to Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels that were transiting the Strait of Hormuz”.

Iranian media have reported several explosions in the southern port city of Sirik, as well as Qeshm Island and Bandar Abbas.

Following the blasts, Iran’s foreign ministry said it held the US government responsible for the consequences of breaching the MoU agreed between the two countries in June. The MoU mandated lifting the US naval blockade on Iran in exchange for Tehran reopening the vital Strait of Hormuz.

The US also agreed at the end of June to waive sanctions on Iranian oil for 60 days.

However, the US Treasury Department on Tuesday moved to revoke the temporary suspension of sanctions on Iranian oil sales after series of attacks on tankers in the Strait of Hormuz this week. A tanker caught fire off the coast of Oman Monday after being struck by an “unknown projectile” in the Strait of Hormuz, according to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO).

Iranian television reported claims that the LNG tanker came under attack after ignoring warnings, but Tehran did not directly claim the assault. Neither the US Central Command (CENTCOM) nor the IRGC commented on the incident.

A second ship, believed to be a Saudi-flagged crude oil tanker, was also damaged in the Strait of Hormuz when the IRGC fired missiles, sources told Reuters news agency.

A US ⁠official warned that Iran’s attacks on vessels in the Strait ‌of Hormuz were “wholly unacceptable” and would ‌be ‌met with consequences, Reuters reported Tuesday.

In response, Iran’s foreign ministry said it would take any measure it deemed necessary to safeguard the country’s interests and national security.


Tuesday, July 07, 2026

Trump says ‘will consider’ selling F-35s to Turkey





Trump says ‘will consider’ selling F-35s to Turkey


Turkey has long sought to revive its participation in the F-35 programme and lift US sanctions on its defence sector


Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan welcomes US President Donald Trump at Esenboga Airport ahead of the Nato Summit in Ankara. (EPA Images pic)



ANKARA: US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Washington would consider selling F-35 fighter jets to Turkey after booting it out of the programme in 2019 over Ankara’s purchase of a Russian system.

“That’s a decision we’re going to make… it’s a great plane, the best plane by far and it’s certainly something we will consider,” Trump said, sitting next to Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan after landing in Ankara for a Nato summit.

Turkey has long sought to resolve the question of its readmittance to the F-35 programme and the lifting of US sanctions that have soured ties and hampered Turkish defence projects and has looked to Trump’s visit to break the deadlock.


When the pair met at the White House last September, both leaders expressed a desire to draw a line under the matter, although lifting the sanctions is a congressional decision.

Asked if he would lift the CAATSA sanctions, Trump said: “We’re going to be taking the sanctions off.”


“We don’t want to sanction friends,” he added.

Sitting next to him, Erdogan said he was confident Trump would resolve the issue and end the dispute.

“Mr Trump has also personally given us his word on this matter,” he said through a translator.

“On this issue, Mr Trump always stands by his word. Here again, God willing, I believe a favourable decision on the F-35s will emerge from this leaders’ summit.”

Leaders in denial over growing anti-PH sentiment, says Kian Ming





Leaders in denial over growing anti-PH sentiment, says Kian Ming


Yesterday
Keerthi Shanggar


The former DAP MP predicts a wave of voter discontent in Saturday's Johor election as well as in the Negeri Sembilan polls


Former DAP central leadership member Ong Kian Ming said Barisan Nasional had managed to consolidate its campaign narrative in Johor around state BN chief Onn Hafiz Ghazi’s leadership. (Facebook pic)



PETALING JAYA: Former Bangi MP Ong Kian Ming said today Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders are in denial over growing sentiment against the coalition, especially among non-Malay voters in Peninsular Malaysia.

He said they had yet to experience the “wave of anti-PH sentiment”, which he predicted would emerge in the Johor election this Saturday.

“It may lead to another wave in Negeri Sembilan and in the next general election,” he told FMT at Menara Axis here today after the launch of University of Nottingham Malaysia’s Asian Institute for Policy and Engagement.

The former DAP central leadership member was responding to criticism of his recent projection that Barisan Nasional (BN) would secure a landslide victory in Johor.

In a statement last Friday, he said BN would win up to 53 of the 56 seats up for grabs, with PH taking only three and Perikatan Nasional possibly failing to win any.


DAP deputy secretary-general Steven Sim later dismissed the prediction as merely an assumption, saying it had no bearing on the outcome at the ballot box.

However, Ong said BN had managed to consolidate its campaign narrative in Johor around state BN chief Onn Hafiz Ghazi’s leadership and “how they want to bring credible and experienced leaders to lead the state government”.

He also reiterated that PH had yet to name its menteri besar candidate, which he suggested had weakened the coalition’s narrative.

In the 2022 state election, BN won 40 seats, followed by PH (12), PN (three), and Muda (one).

‘If it’s from the PM, I will act on it’: Ex-finance minister Tengku Zafrul says in Muhyiddin’s trial






‘If it’s from the PM, I will act on it’: Ex-finance minister Tengku Zafrul says in Muhyiddin’s trial



Former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin arrives at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex for his ongoing trial July 7, 2026. — Picture by Raymond Manuel

First Published: Tuesday, 07 Jul 2026 7:46 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 — Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz today confirmed he did have the power when he was finance minister to not act on companies’ applications for government projects, but said he would ensure that the Finance Ministry considers the applications if they were forwarded by the prime minister.

Tengku Zafrul, 53, said this while testifying as the prosecution’s 11th witness in Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia president and former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s power abuse and money laundering trial.

Tengku Zafrul was previously the finance minister from March 2020 to August 2021 during Muhyiddin’s administration.

Since yesterday, he has been testifying on lists of companies forwarded either by then-PM Muhyiddin or the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) for the Finance Ministry to consider for government projects under the Bumiputera contractors’ programme Jana Wibawa.

These were listed in the High Court as letters to then-finance minister Tengku Zafrul, along with brief handwritten notes known as “minutes” by Muhyiddin on the documents sent:then-PM Muhyiddin’s November 13, 2020 letter to propose 54 contractors to be appointed through direct negotiation or without open tender for 54 projects under Jana Wibawa (with Muhyiddin asking the Finance Ministry to immediately consider the proposal);
PMO’s February 3, 2021 letter along with five companies’ applications for a Pulau Indah highway project in Klang, Selangor (with Muhyiddin’s minutes agreeing for the project to be via a pre-qualified or limited tender among the five companies).
PMO’s March 17, 2021 letter along with five other companies’ applications to build the Klang Utara district police headquarters in Selangor (with Muhyiddin’s minutes also agreeing for the project to be via a pre-qualified or limited tender among these five).

When cross-examined by Muhyiddin’s lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad today, Tengku Zafrul confirmed that he has the power to decide whether to take action or not, as long as companies’ applications reach the Finance Ministry or are brought to his attention as the Finance Minister.

Tengku Zafrul agreed that it does not matter where the companies’ project applications come from as long as it was brought to his attention, also agreeing that the minutes by Muhyiddin were to “bring to my attention for consideration”.


“Yes, but if it’s from the prime minister, I will act on it,” Tengku Zafrul said.

When Amer suggested that the minutes from Muhyiddin were “not final”, Tengku Zafrul replied: “I will act to ensure it is put to consideration.”

Tengku Zafrul confirmed he had as finance minister received many minutes from Muhyiddin, and agreed with Amer Hamzah’s suggestion that Muhyiddin’s minutes to the Finance Ministry or to him by itself were “nothing unusual”.

While Amer Hamzah suggested that the minutes were a way of highlighting matters and passing it on if there is anything to be done, Tengku Zafrul said it would depend on how the minutes is written as “there would be instances the minutes would be clear that you should not proceed”.

“For example, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin can say ‘I do not agree’,” Tengku Zafrul said.

But specifically for the Jana Wibawa projects, Tengku Zafrul agreed with Amer Hamzah that Muhyiddin was merely notifying him and asking him to look into the companies’ applications for the projects.



Former finance minister Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz arrives at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex to testify as a key prosecution witness at the corruption trial involving former Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin July 7, 2026. — Picture by Raymond Manuel



About the proposed 54 contractors for 54 projects list

Amer Hamzah suggested that the list of 54 companies sent by Muhyiddin to him for Jana Wibawa projects did not indicate “preferential treatment for all these companies”, which Tengku Zafrul agreed to.

Tengku Zafrul also agreed when Amer Hamzah said the list is “also not an indication that any of the companies should be favoured”.

Tengku Zafrul agreed that there was no interference or meddling by Muhyiddin as the PM or the PMO in terms of both the awarding of the projects and the government’s evaluation of whether the companies were qualified for the projects.

When asked if the list of 54 companies being brought to his attention meant that the companies should be approved by the Finance Ministry and awarded the projects, Tengku Zafrul replied that “it means the companies should be considered”.

Tengku Zafrul said he could not confirm whether all these 54 companies have been awarded projects.

Earlier, Amer Hamzah suggested that the then prime minister Muhyiddin “would not be micromanaging every single aspect of every economic stimulus packages” and that there would be officers to assist him, with Tengku Zafrul then agreeing.

Among other things, Tengku Zafrul agreed with Amer Hamzah that the fact that the list was enclosed in a letter signed by then-PM Muhyiddin “is not indicative” that it was the PM who actually prepared the contents of the list.

Tengku Zafrul said he did not know who prepared the list of 54 companies, but agreed that this kind of information would typically be compiled by officers.

The list had listed the proposed 54 contractors, along with the names of the 54 proposed projects along with the project value.



Lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad is seen during former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddn Yassin’s corruption case at the Kuala Lumpur Court Complex March 10, 2026. — Picture by Sayuti Zainudin



Earlier today, Tengku Zafrul confirmed at the High Court that Malaysia has more Bumiputera contractors than the 54 companies in the list forwarded by Muhyiddin.

Tengku Zafrul also confirmed to lead prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin that Muhyiddin never asked him to cancel the government procurement for KCJ Engineering Sdn Bhd, or the government procurement processes for both Sutracom Sdn Bhd and Nepturis Sdn Bhd.

KCJ Engineering was one of the 54 companies and was awarded a RM62 million project to build a new road from Felda Bukit Jalor to Gemas, Negeri Sembilan.

Sutracom and Nepturis (both which had applications forwarded to Tengku Zafrul) each separately received the Finance Ministry’s approval for the RM605.2 million Pulau Indah highway project and the RM141 million project to build the Klang Utara district police headquarters.

Previously, evidence in this trial such as bank documents showed that KCJ Engineering’s four cheques totalling RM800,000 were deposited into Bersatu’s CIMB account on October 12, 2022, while a RM1 million cheque from Nepturis was deposited into Bersatu’s AmBank account on February 21, 2022.

In this trial, Muhyiddin is facing seven charges, namely four counts of alleged power abuse to obtain RM225.3m bribes for Bersatu (from Nepturis, Azman Yusoff, Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd, and Mamfor Sdn Bhd) and three counts of alleged money laundering through money that Bersatu received from Bukhary Equity.

The trial before High Court judge Noor Ruwena Md Nurdin resumes tomorrow, with Tengku Zafrul to continue testifying.

Turkiye rejects Israeli claim on F‑35 fighter jet sale as ‘disinformation’






Turkiye rejects Israeli claim on F‑35 fighter jet sale as ‘disinformation’



The F-35 Lightning II jet is coveted by US allies around the world, especially Ukraine, with its distinctive shape and features that shield it from radar detection. ― AFP file pic

First Published: Tuesday, 07 Jul 2026 7:19 PM MYT
Last Modified: Tuesday, 07 Jul 2026 7:21 PM MYT


ISTANBUL, July 7 — Turkiye today rejected as “disinformation” Israel’s claim that the sale to Ankara of US F-35 fighter jets and components would upset the regional power balance.

Ahead of a Nato summit in Turkiye, Ankara’s foreign ministry slammed the claim made yesterday by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.


“The baseless allegations recently circulated by Israeli officials in a coordinated manner and with calculated timing are part of a disinformation campaign,” the ministry said.

“Netanyahu and his partners in crime deliberately distort any criticism directed at them and seek to divert attention through a systematic propaganda effort.”

Netanyahu had yesterday urged the United States not to sell the jets to Nato ally Turkiye, arguing it would “upset the power balance” in the region.


Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan was due to receive his US counterpart Donald Trump ahead of the summit starting Tuesday evening.

Last month, Trump promised to make Erdogan “very happy” when asked about Turkiye looking to secure F110 jet engines and regaining access to the F-35 programme.


Analysts say Turkiye wants to secure the new engines for use in its flagship KAAN stealth fighter project, as Ankara seeks to join the exclusive club of nations producing fifth-generation combat aircraft, which notably includes the United States, China and Russia.

In 2019, Washington expelled Turkiye from the F-35 programme two years after Ankara acquired a Russian S-400 missile defence system.

Ankara’s foreign ministry said Israel’s pushback could not “conceal the Netanyahu government’s genocide in Gaza, its policies of occupation and annexation, and its destabilising actions in the region”.

The ministry added Turkiye wanted to see peace, stability and prosperity come to the whole region and that “with this understanding, we once again call on Israel to pursue a constructive and peaceful policy.”

Netanyahu yesterday told Fox News: “I don’t think (Turkiye) should be given F-35s or the engines for their fighter jets, because that’ll upset the power balance in the Middle East, which is ultimately guaranteed by Israeli air superiority and also by, I think, by America’s posture in the Middle East.”

Erdogan is counting on his good relations with Trump and his country’s return to favour with Washington notably over its support for Ukraine to secure the delivery of six jets, for which payment has already been made. — AFP