Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Letter from Larut: the ground that holds Hamzah’s political strength


FMT:

Letter from Larut: the ground that holds Hamzah’s political strength


There is a widespread perception among Larut voters that their constituency has produced a leader capable of operating at the highest levels of government





On my way to Padang Besar, Perlis, last week, I made a detour into Larut.

What began as a brief stop soon turned into a slow drive through parts of the constituency — first Batu Kurau, then Kubu Gajah, before ending the day breaking fast in Selama.


Larut (P56), a parliamentary constituency in Perak, is represented by Hamzah Zainudin, formerly the deputy president of Bersatu and currently the opposition leader in the Dewan Rakyat.

His name has been circulating widely in national politics of late, but here in Larut the conversation about him feels less like news and more like familiarity — the kind usually reserved for a local political strongman.

To understand Hamzah’s political standing, one has to spend time in places like these —- small rural towns, village markets, roadside cafes and surau compounds.


Political strength

Larut is where the foundations of his political strength were built, patiently and over many years.


Then with Umno, Hamzah first won the seat in the 2008 general election under the Barisan Nasional coalition banner. He retained the seat again in 2013 and 2018, both times comfortably.


He left Umno for Bersatu after the 2018 general election, and four years later, contested under the Perikatan Nasional banner at the 15th general election.


Despite the shift in political platforms, something that might have unsettled many constituencies, Hamzah held on to Larut convincingly.

Within its parliamentary constituency, Larut has three state seats — Selama and Kubu Gajah (both won by PN-PAS), and Batu Kurau (under PN-Bersatu).

In the 2022 general election, Hamzah secured 28,350 votes, defeating the BN candidate Shafiq Fhadly Mahmud, who received 16,752 votes. As for the remaining candidates, Zolkharnain Abidin of PH obtained only 6,207 votes while Auzaie Fadzlan Shahidi of Pejuang lost his deposit with only 566 votes.


Larut’s political behaviour is also shaped by its demographics. The constituency is majority Malay, with sizeable Chinese communities in towns such as Selama and Rantau Panjang, and smaller Indian and Orang Asli populations scattered across plantations and rural areas.


In many ways, Larut reflects the political character of northern Perak — rural, socially conservative and historically comfortable with strong local personalities.

Electoral outcomes here are often less about national swings and more about the credibility of the individual candidate on the ground.


Tin mining district

Historically significant in Perak, Larut has always been associated with tin mining, and, in fact, was considered a hub in 19th-century Malaya.

Developed in the 1850s following the discovery by Long Jaafar of rich tin deposits, it was the site of the Larut Wars between two Chinese secret societies — Gee Hin Kongsi and Hai San Society.

The conflicts of the 1860s and 1870s eventually drew in British intervention — leading to the appointment of the first British Resident in Perak, marking a turning point in the colonial administration of the Malay states.

Larut is not a small constituency. It stretches across roughly 1,129 square km — about the size of Hong Kong (1,106 square km) and significantly larger than Singapore (728 square km).

The terrain runs from plantations and villages to small towns and hill settlements. Representing such a constituency requires more than political branding; it demands presence, patience and years of personal engagement.

The issues that dominate conversations here are often practical rather than ideological. Roads linking villages to the main towns, agricultural support for smallholders, youth employment and flood mitigation during the monsoon months come up more frequently than national political debates.

In places like Batu Kurau and Selama, many residents still depend on rubber smallholdings, oil palm plots or small-scale trading.

Federal access and government assistance therefore carry significant weight, and having a representative perceived as well connected in Putrajaya matters.

Yet, despite its size, Hamzah is widely recognised here. In roadside coffee shops, village markets and town centres, his name surfaces easily in conversation.


National leader

Many people remember meeting him, attended events he officiated, or saw him on the ground during local programmes.

For a constituency of this scale, that familiarity is not accidental. Neither is it the work of party politics; it is the product of years of personal groundwork — caring, friendly and approachable.

Long before becoming Larut MP, Hamzah had already established himself in federal politics, serving as a senator in the Dewan Negara from 2000 to 2006.

After winning Larut as an Umno candidate in 2008, his national career steadily progressed.

He became a deputy minister, later a full cabinet minister, and eventually served as home minister when Muhyiddin Yassin led the PN government in 2020.

For many in Larut, his rise in national politics was seen, not as distant power, but as a reflection of their own representative’s growing influence.

So, how do the local voters in Larut currently perceive their leader, Hamzah Zainudin?

There is a widespread perception that their constituency had produced a leader capable of operating at the highest levels of government.

There was, until recently, a widely shared expectation that Hamzah would one day take over the leadership of Bersatu from Muhyiddin and lead PN into the next general election.

In Larut, some even spoke of him as a potential candidate for the post of prime minister.

Recent political events and subsequent developments, including his removal from the deputy presidency of Bersatu, may have altered that trajectory, at least for now.

But in Larut, the sentiment appears less about immediate positions than about long-term confidence in their son of the soil.

What stands out is that Hamzah’s support here appears to cut across party lines.

Supporters of Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS), Bersatu and even segments of Umno voters speak of him with a degree of respect rarely afforded to politicians in a deeply polarised environment.

That may ultimately explain his durability. Parties change. Coalitions rise and fall. But a political base built patiently over the years, town by town and village by village, tends to endure.

In an era when Malaysian politics is increasingly shaped by shifting alliances in Kuala Lumpur, Larut offers a reminder that the foundations of political power are often laid far from the capital — in coffee shops, surau compounds and quiet constituency sites that rarely make the headlines.

And in Larut, that foundation still appears very much intact.

Salam Hari Raya. Maaf Zahir & Batin.

The 5 Malay warriors of Malaysia’s turbulent politics


FMT:

The 5 Malay warriors of Malaysia’s turbulent politics


Yesterday
Tajuddin Rasdi

Who among ‘Hang Pintar’, ‘Hang Popular’, ’Hang Senyap’, ‘Hang Handsome’ and ‘Hang Merajuk’ has what it takes to be the next prime minister?





Over the past five years, Malaysian politics has been marred by a host of sackings and suspensions of so‑called party rebels.

And those who have been given the boot are no ordinary folk. For the most part, they appear to have enough personality to succeed some of our Malay folklore heroes.


In this piece, allow me to take certain creative liberties with well‑established lore, and re‑imagine it for present times.

To me, there are five warriors in our beloved kingdom — Hang Pintar, Hang Popular, Hang Senyap, Hang Handsome and Hang Merajuk.

They are, for better or worse, the modern day political equivalents of the legendary Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat, Hang Kesturi, Hang Lekir and Hang Lekiu of the glorious Melaka sultanate.

According to a book edited by the late Kassim Ahmad, the Melaka Five grew up as friends and trained under the same silat master. Of them all, Tuah was said to be the most loyal, skilled and cunning, able to even trick a princess from another kingdom into marrying his boss, the Raja.


Hang Tuah’s popularity however triggered a jealous aristocrat into accusing the mighty warrior of sleeping with one of the Raja’s women. As a result, the Raja ordered his Bendahara — the equivalent of the prime minister at the time — to have him executed.

The Bendahara, however, hid Tuah and lied to the Raja that he had been executed as ordered.


When Hang Jebat got wind of the supposed execution, he went berserk and killed many soldiers and generals. When Jebat captured the castle, the Raja broke down in regret.

It was then that the Bendahara brought Tuah out of hiding, and the Raja promptly forgave his best warrior.

But there was a problem. Hang Jebat’s killing spree prompted Tuah to demand that his childhood friend surrender. Jebat refused, knowing it would lead to his own execution.

That led to a fight which saw Tuah kill his beloved friend.


For the Malay community, Hang Tuah represents bravery and unquestioned loyalty to the sovereign, while Hang Jebat taught us a lesson in standing up to tyranny and courage.

But what are the “Hangs” in our political arena like?


Hang Pintar

As the party’s second-in-command, he was rumoured to have secretly collaborated with a member of a partner party — though some dispute this— and was endorsed as a future prime minister.

But Hang Pintar was sacked, although the significant influence he had over his former party has led many to pledge their allegiance to him. For his part, Hang Pintar has forged a strategic alliance with two other parties and is set to form his own outfit.

Once he does, he is expected to join the opposition coalition, setting the stage for a direct showdown with his chief rival.

Hang Pintar stands to win big, maybe even claim the prime ministership, provided he can oust his main rival who doesn’t seem to enjoy the support of his entire party.


Hang Popular

This personality recently indicated that he would return to his former party after its president spoke of amnesty.

Hang Popular has, following his ouster, re-invented himself and has become all the rage, which counts a lot in Malaysia’s realpolitik.

He did not resort to personal attacks of his former president, choosing instead to bide his time while waiting for the door to be opened for his re-entry.


Hang Senyap

This particular general took an even more interesting approach. He went completely silent, leaving people to wonder whether he has been meditating or hatching his own scheme.

But as they say, still waters run deep. Leaders of this kind may be easy to strike in the open, yet remain extremely dangerous, and poised to move without warning.


Hang Handsome

This particular general is the slickest of them all. He leads a rebellion without being on the front line. There is no bravado or grand declarations that so-and-so is his number one enemy.

This particular general tends to get others to do his bidding and has likely forged secret alliances with other parties as a “Plan B”.


Hang Merajuk

The loudest and most boisterous of all the other warriors is the jilted one. He attacks his own party, his own president and burns bridges with every important political entity. He tries to sell himself as a political messiah — uncompromised and not tainted by dirty politics.

This general is so sure of himself that he makes no alliances and draws up no strategies, instead adopting a scorched-earth approach, although this could be to his detriment. Will any of the other generals want to join forces with him?

But who will win?

Several questions remain. Who among the five generals are prime minister material? And who will suffer the same fate as Hang Jebat?

If any of these generals want to usher in changes, are they capable of building alliances, or will they act alone?

Do they have strategies which will give them a better chance of taking over Putrajaya and affecting change?


Blast over Jerusalem, Israel building hit after Iran missile fire


FMT:

Blast over Jerusalem, Israel building hit after Iran missile fire


The Israeli military sent search and rescue teams to a damaged building following two rounds of Iranian missile fire


AFP reporters in Jerusalem heard a loud explosion, and medics reported no casualties. (AFP pic)


JERUSALEM: A loud blast rang out over Jerusalem early today as the Israeli military sent search and rescue teams to a damaged building following two rounds of Iranian missile fire.

Israel’s military announced the Iranian launches hours after US president Donald Trump said Washington had held talks with an unnamed Iranian official – a report denied by Tehran.

Minutes after the second missile alert, AFP reporters in Jerusalem heard a loud explosion, but the military said people were now cleared to leave their shelters and medics reported no casualties.


Following the first launch, the military said it had sent “search and rescue forces to operate at a scene in northern Israel where reports of an impact have been received”.

The Magen David Adom emergency services released video of a damaged building, with a smashed area on an upper floor and rubble spread across the ground.


The medics said they were providing treatment to a man in his 30s who suffered mild injuries after stepping on shrapnel, but there were no other casualty reports.

Yesterday, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he spoke with Trump and relayed that the president believed US-Israeli military gains in Iran could be converted into a negotiated agreement that protects Israel’s interests.

Shock in Dimona as Iranian missile strike shatters homes near Israel’s secretive nuclear site





Shock in Dimona as Iranian missile strike shatters homes near Israel’s secretive nuclear site



An Ultra-Othodox Jewish man looks at the houses destroyed in an Iranian missile strike in Dimona on March 22, 2026. — AFP pic

Monday, 23 Mar 2026 9:00 PM MYT


DIMONA (Israel), March 23 — Galit Amir said she thought the presence of a key Israeli nuclear facility on the edge of her hometown Dimona meant it would be well-protected by air defences during the war with Iran.


But that sense of security was torn apart Saturday evening when a direct strike by an Iranian ballistic missile ripped open residential buildings and left dozens wounded.


“We thought we were safe,” Amir, a 50-year-old care provider, told AFP.

A day after the devastating blow in the southern town of 40,000 nestled in the Negev desert, residents spoke of shock mixed with resignation, but were largely reluctant to discuss the presence of the ultra-secret nuclear facility nearby.

Israel’s much-vaunted air defences failed to intercept the projectile, which Iran said was launched in response to a strike on its nuclear facility at Natanz.


Another Israeli town nearby was also hit just hours later by another direct strike.

“Dimona is the most safe place in Israel,” said Amir, who runs a care home not far from the nuclear site. “We didn’t expect this.”


Six people were inside her nursing home at the time of the strike and suffered minor injuries, she said.

Dimona lies next to the Shimon Peres Negev Nuclear Research Center, a facility officially dedicated to research but widely believed by analysts to house Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal.

Little information has emerged about the Dimona site.

Israel maintains a policy of “strategic ambiguity”, neither confirming nor denying possession of nuclear weapons.

Saturday’s strike, which hit a residential neighbourhood just kilometres from the facility, marks a significant and dangerous escalation, and has thrust the desert town into the global spotlight.


‘Everything was destroyed’

Wary of journalists, some residents avoided talking about the sensitive issue.

Asked about safety near a potentially targeted nuclear site, a young woman standing outside her home, its front door blown inward, said: “They hit a textile factory, that’s all.”

“There is no nuclear research facility,” insisted David Azran, 54, a contractor standing near a crater and the remains of his home just metres from the impact point.

“I don’t feel threatened. I have faith,” said Azran, a rifle slung over his shoulder.

At the impact site, the scale of destruction was jarring.

Debris stretched as far as the eye can see: chunks of concrete, collapsed walls, shattered glass and twisted metal scattered everywhere.

Nearby houses were blown apart, sometimes leaving only a few load-bearing walls standing like hollow shells.

Some signs of everyday life were visible too: a large exercise ball and a bag of dog food scattered in the dust.

The impact site lies about five kilometres from the nuclear facility, which is hidden in the mountains southeast of the town.

Since February 28, the Middle East has been engulfed in war triggered by joint US and Israeli strikes on Iran, to which Tehran has responded with missile and drone attacks targeting Israel and several countries in the region.

“We feel completely safe here. There is no cause for concern,” said Krishna Vishwakarma, a 34-year-old carpenter from India.

Motherland




Einav Alon, 37, whose supermarket was damaged in the strike, described the scene: “When we left the bomb shelter room, everything was destroyed”.

The mother of two boys, aged eight and six, said she was “quite surprised”.

Still, she added: “We don’t feel scared.” — AFP

A slap on the wrist: Existing legal gaps weaken crackdown on syndicated cable theft, among key challenges, says Prasarana




A slap on the wrist: Existing legal gaps weaken crackdown on syndicated cable theft, among key challenges, says Prasarana



Lenient legal deterrence and increasingly organised syndicates have resulted in rising cable theft cases and financial losses. — Picture by Raymond Manuel

Tuesday, 24 Mar 2026 7:00 AM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, March 24 — For cable thieves, it has become a high-risk, high-reward crime but weak legal deterrence has allowed them to grow bolder and continue to thrive even after being caught — a trend rail authorities say will persist unless laws are strengthened.

One key challenge is the difficulty of securing heavier charges, as proving intent to sabotage critical infrastructure requires a higher burden of proof, often resulting in offenders being charged with minor offences instead.

“Law enforcement like the Royal Malaysia Police has been very helpful in curbing cable theft but their hands have been tied for a long time.

“Because the burden of proof to show they performed sabotage is very high, and the evidence requires photographic proof of the perpetrators with their tools cutting the cables.

Operating with speed and precision, the thieves often leave authorities little time to catch them in the act as breaching an access point from ground level typically takes 10 to 15 minutes.


Low penalties

“From a legislative point of view, it is easier to charge them under criminal trespass or possession of stolen goods instead and that is not a sufficient deterrent,” Prasarana Group chief health, safety, security, environment and sustainable development officer Idzqandar Abu Bakar told Malay Mail in an interview recently.




Idzqandar said lenient legal deterrence has resulted in rising cases of cable thefts and repeated offenders. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa


Idzqandar said law enforcement authorities typically investigate cable theft incidents under Section 379 of the Penal Code for theft, but suspects are often ultimately prosecuted under Sections 447 for criminal trespass instead.

In certain instances, suspects are also charged under Section 29(1) of the Minor Offences Act for possession of stolen goods which provides a maximum fine of RM1,000 or imprisonment for up to one year or both if convicted.

The difference in penalties is stark: theft carries a jail term of up to seven years, a fine or both, while criminal trespass carries a jail term of up to six months, a fine of up to RM3,000 or both.

“So if you consider the scrap value (of the stolen cables) to be RM50,000 to RM60,000 per night and every time you get caught you only receive a fine up to RM3,000 or several months in jail, that is not enough of a deterrent.

“It’s a worthwhile effort for them,” he said, adding that each incident results in approximately RM90,000 in replacement costs for Prasarana.


Dangerous but lucrative

Idzqandar recalled a suspect risking his life to evade capture, underscoring the crime’s high-risk, high-reward nature.

“There was a case where our patrol discovered a suspect traversing the elevated tracks and decided to corner him on both ends of the rail which the suspect later realised.

“He then decided to jump down when we started pursuing and managed to escape. Later, during another theft incident, we caught a suspect walking with a crutch who admitted to being the same person from before.

“But this time he was on the ground (in charge of) collecting the stolen cables thrown down by his accomplice from the tracks above,” he said.



The 48km-long MRT Kajang Line is one of the two most frequent targets of coordinated cable theft syndicates, with 25 such cases reported in 2025 alone. — Picture by Choo Choy May


Increasingly syndicated as law reform lags

Recently, Transport minister Anthony Loke said a proposal has been submitted to the Home Ministry to amend existing laws, imposing harsher penalties on individuals involved in cable theft.

Loke was quoted saying cable theft cannot be treated as a normal theft, as it has the potential to endanger public safety and disrupts the operation of the public transport system.


Career crime

“If you look at the pattern (of thefts), some involve the same person we arrested several times in the past, so it has become a career for them.

“And we sort of know who (the usual suspects are) because we later found out they were a group comprising a father, his son and his son’s cousin,” Idzqandar said, noting that most were locals.

There were also instances of arrested foreigners, but Idzqandar said they were mostly hired help with local syndicates being the masterminds.

According to Idzqandar, there have been no reported electrocution cases or fatalities, reflecting the suspects’ degree of planning and preparation despite the inherent dangers.

Therefore, a stricter form of punishment must be introduced to effectively deter what has evolved into a highly coordinated criminal operation possessing technical skills, specialised tools and detailed knowledge of the rail alignment.

When asked whether any incidents involved inside jobs, Idzqandar said it cannot be ruled out, but nothing has been proven to date.

“That is why one of the things we are proposing is to prosecute people with the intent to sabotage if they are found trespassing with the right tools rather than waiting until they are caught red-handed,” Idzqandar said.

DIESEL AT RM4.90 PER LITER

 

Monday, March 23, 2026


DIESEL AT RM4.90 PER LITER


Diesel fuel is selling at RM4.90 per liter at the pump. It is going to send prices of everything up again. The whole world is delivered by trucks and lorries that run on diesel. All construction machinery and heavy equipment run on diesel. Construction costs are going to go up as well. 

Oil price is at US$91.84 per barrel (WTI today's price in the US). Despite the Iran situation. The in-the-know people say the war plan covers SIX WEEKS and today is the 24th day of the war - four days shy of four weeks. The next two weeks will be the closing phases. 

The regime in Iran is now being run almost completely by remnants of the IRGC leadership. The latest scare yesterday was the two missiles fired by the IRGC at the American military base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. It created a scare because Diego Garcia is 4,000 km distant from Iran. Implying that the IRGC has developed 4,000 km range ballistic missiles - enough range to hit Finland. 

However both missiles splashed into the sea, at some distance from Diego Garcia. This implies that the missiles did not have sufficient range. It was psy war to trick people into believing that indeed they did have long range missiles. Thus increasing pressure on the western media to push for de-escalation. The trick seems to have worked because the legacy press has been playing up the "threat to Europe" angle. 

Oil prices moved up a little. Lets see what happens tomorrow.

Some countries are facing serious economic problems - even without any help from the Iran situation. Pakistan closed its schools for two weeks. Offices and businesses in Pakistan have been told to work for FOUR DAYS only - to save on fuel consumption by the economy.   Pakistan does not have foreign exchange reserves (US Dollars) to pay for a higher oil import bill.  Plus they do not export much to accumulate foreign exchange reserves in the first place.

Indonesia is having problems too. The Indon rupiah is still crashing. It is now at 16,975 Rupiah to one US Dollar.

Here is the 5 Year chart for the Indon Rupiah vs USD. You can see it is doomed.



The Ringgit seems to be holding steady at around RM3.93 to the US Dollar. I hope it strengthens further. It will certainly help reduce price inflation of imported goods. 

The private sector economy must be grown even more to totally eclipse the goverment sector. It will help to strengthen the Ringgit even more.  

Monday, March 23, 2026

DEFEAT - Trump backs down


From the FB page of:





THE AMERICAN-ISRAELI ATTACK on Iran is stopping, US President Donald Trump said within the past hour.
The US army’s imminent attack to destroy Iranian infrastructure will not go ahead, he said in an unexpected post on Truth Social.
It will pause for five days, to begin with, and then the situation will be reviewed.
.
POSITIVE SPIN
Trump tried to put a positive spin on the obvious defeat by saying in his post that the pause had come about because of “very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East”.
But this was clearly untrue.



The Iranians had already made their peace concessions in full last month.
The real story, which can hardly be denied, is that the Iranians are undefeated after three weeks of fighting, and have the spirit to continue the battle—and Trump could not afford more pain to the US Armed Forces, or to their reputation, or to their allies, or to the global economy.
He's backing down.
Trump’s advisors clearly told him that if the stand off continued or escalated, he would personally be blamed for triggering a global recession. Even with his extraordinary talent for self-delusion, he could not face that fact.
.
TOTAL DEFEAT
The attack on Iran has been a clear failure for the US.
FAILED: The promise to fulfil Netanyahu’s 40-year-old dream to destroy Iran was not achieved.
FAILED: The achievement of regime change, which is illegal under international law, was not achieved.
FAILED: The destruction of Iran’s WMDs could not be achieved, since they never existed, as the US’s 18 intelligence agencies agreed.
FAILED: Perhaps worst of all, the opportunity to burnish the US Armed Forces' reputation as a power able to speedily conquer any enemy flopped badly. The US military, despite Israel’s help, struggled badly.
FAILED: The defeat is also a personal one for Donald Trump and Secretary for War Crimes Pete Hegseth too. They treated the attacks on Iran as if they were schoolboys playing war games—and respect, once lost, is very hard to regain.
.
IT WAS NEVER A WAR
The western mainstream press will report that the “Iran war” has temporarily paused, and may be over. But this is not accurate.
There never was a war. The US did not declare war on Iran. It made an unprovoked attack, which is something very different in international law.
By pretending it was a war, western politicians and the western corporate media can call for Iran to stop its attacks on military bases in the Gulf.
But if they described it as it really was – an unprovoked attack by the US and Israel, using a variety of bases (in the Gulf states and the UK), then the world has to see the real story: Iran was attacked and was defending itself.
Iran did so by firing missiles at the bases from which the attacks came. This is entirely legitimate within the scope of United Nations law.
The world has learned that a rogue state willing to disregard international law and cause immense damage to the economies of the planet exists.
We can use Trump's phrase, and says that a “terror regime” exists and is a genuine problem for the world.
But it was never Iran.


Pete Hegseth is promoting a nihilist cult of death




Pete Hegseth is promoting a nihilist cult of death


Jan-Werner Müller



The Trump administration is embracing violence for the sake of violence

Mon 23 Mar 2026 21.00 AEDT



‘Faithful to his master’s desire for total domination and destruction, Hegseth announces future war crimes on live TV.’ Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters


It appears that members of Trump’s cabinet get chosen not despite their endorsements of violence, but because of them. Pete Hegseth was primarily known as a dapper TV host willing to defend war crimes. Markwayne Mullin is apparently still proud of challenging a witness to a fistfight at a Senate hearing; he also refuses to apologize for “understanding” an assault on fellow senator Rand Paul. Never before has an administration so openly glorified outright killing as the current White House propaganda machine does with its obscene snuff videos of the Iran war and the destruction of small boats.

Unlike with fascism in the 20th century, there is no attempt to promote or symbolically reward self-sacrifice – it is just video game-style killing at a distance, justified not with strategic objectives, but with seemingly uncontrollable emotions (“fury” and a thirst for vengeance). And all accompanied by open admissions that basic laws of warfare will be broken. Actual soldiers with longstanding codes of honor, as opposed to the fantasy world Hegseth is creating with his cliche-ridden chatter on TV, would not punch enemies when they are down.

Trump has never hidden his desire for domination and the related willingness to have his followers engage in violence, from the call to rough up people at his rallies to the pardons of even the most brutal January 6 insurrectionists.


Hegseth and company are promoting an ultimately nihilist cult of death

During his first administration, an “axis of adults” mostly held his worst impulses in check; after the Venezuela “excursion” and the realization that people on small boats can be killed with impunity, Hegseth, and perhaps even Rubio, seem drunk on the idea that special military operations could be quick and costless in American lives – and make for great TV. Trump’s fixation on visuals and props – if I show a pile of paper on TV, it means I really have divested from my companies, or I really have a great healthcare plan – is now shared across his administration.


Trump himself appears to treat a global decapitation campaign as if it were a version of The Apprentice that includes firing live ammunition – as if he gets to remove other leaders, and as if he should get to choose the successors of whoever gets kidnapped or killed.

Historically, there is an ideology that made the glorification of violence central to their propaganda. “Long live death” was a fascist slogan; Mussolini’s movement started with veterans and celebrated them as a “trenchocracy” – an aristocracy of men hardened by battle in the trenches.

Gigantic ossuaries for the war dead – some holding the bones of as many as 100,000 dead soldiers – were meant to encourage future sacrifice; the Nazis in turn presented their youth with slogans like “We are born to die for Germany”.

It seems that Hegseth and company are also promoting an ultimately nihilist cult of death. But it celebrates killing by pressing a button thousands of miles away; meanwhile, America’s own dead are dishonored, as Trump has used their repatriation to display his Maga merch and fundraise off the victims of war.

Is anyone as ill-suited for great office as Donald Trump? Yes, Pete Hegseth – that’s why Potus likes him
Emma Brockes


Read more


Simultaneously, faithful to his master’s desire for total domination and destruction, Hegseth announces future war crimes on live TV (“no quarter”) and encourages gratuitous cruelty: “We are punching them while they’re down.” The obscene focus on “lethality” is part of this shift towards war understood as inflicting maximum destruction and pain (as opposed to achieving strategic objectives – which the administration has of course been utterly incapable of articulating).


The reality of war itself recedes because the airwaves are filled with an endless series of entertaining images and empty talk. Hegseth, fond of laughably overwrought language and alliterations in particular (“warriors, not wokesters”), seems unable to articulate anything other than cliches (“unbreakable will”) or snippets of a Christian nationalism which flies in the face of the first amendment’s prohibiting an established religion: one cannot make it a litmus test of patriotism that citizens pray for the troops on bended knees and in the name of Jesus.

The point is not to equate the two men, but one cannot help but remember how Hannah Arendt, in her highly controversial book on the Eichmann trial, described the Nazi bureaucrat: someone utterly incapable of thinking, someone who instead just produced an endless stream of hollow phrases.

Will all this have an effect in legitimizing an illegal war? Hegseth has also created a fantasy world inside the Pentagon itself; instead of press conferences with critical questions and genuine answers, there is gentle back-and-forth between “the secretary of war” – a fantasy name, as Congress has not authorized changing the department’s name – and figures from the Epoch Times and LindellTV (the world according to “the MyPillow guy”).

Even with this extra layer of insulation from reality, Hegseth insisted that the press was not being positive enough about US attacks on Iran. Like with many Maga men performing puerile stunts for the manosphere, the fragile ego inside seems incapable of facing up to the reality of what has been unleashed so thoughtlessly.


Jan-Werner Mueller is a Guardian US columnist