Sunday, November 08, 2026

Providence Becomes Largest US City to Divest From Israel




Consortium News
Volume 31, Number 308 — Saturday, November 7, 2026


Providence Becomes Largest US City to Divest From Israel


Organizers in Rhode Island’s capital city are celebrating a win for direct democracy as the Palestine solidarity movement marks its first binding municipal divestment law passed by popular vote, Shireen Akram-Boshar reports.



Skyline of Providence, Rhode Island, with a view of Providence River Bridge, 2025. (Quintin Soloviev /Wikimedia Commons/CC BY 4.0)

By Shireen Akram-Boshar
Truthout



On Tuesday, voters in Providence, Rhode Island, overwhelmingly passed an ordinance requiring the city to divest from companies that enable genocide, apartheid, and human rights violations.

The ordinance is the Palestine solidarity movement’s first binding municipal divestment law passed through popular vote, versus voting by elected officials, in the U.S. — and makes Providence the largest U.S. city to vote to divest from Israel.

The ordinance, listed on Providence’s ballot as Question 7, passed by 74.99 percent. It calls on the city to “divest from countries and companies profiting from genocide, apartheid, ethnic cleansing and prolonged military occupation,” and became a ballot question due to a sustained, popular campaign led by the Providence for Palestine Coalition over the past year.

[While the ordinance does not name Israel or restrict itself to any particular government, it is widely seen as a victory for the Israeli boycott movement.]

“Millions of dollars in Providence city funds are invested in companies facilitating and profiting from the Israeli genocide in Gaza, apartheid system in the occupied West Bank, and ongoing assault on Lebanon and Iran,” Jewish Voice for Peace-Rhode Island said in a press release.


“In addition, Providence has a 20-year history of investing millions in Israel Bonds, which function as direct, no-strings-attached loans to the Israeli government and military.”

Jackie Goldman, a Jewish Voice for Peace organizer and city councilor elect, told Truthout that the ordinance is “the first constituent-led ballot initiative, which is both unique and replicable.”

“It was regular people who said, ‘we are going to create this ordinance, we are going to get enough signatures to get this on the ballot, we are not waiting for our elected officials to do something, we are going to do that work ourselves to make it happen,’” Goldman said.

[U.S. cities that since 2024 have passed some sort of divestment initiative through elected officials, include Hayward and Richmond in California; Portland and Belfast in Maine; Hamtramck and Dearborn in Michigan; Medford, Massachusetts, and most recently, in late October, Cambridge, Massachusetts.]

Goldman said that the ballot initiative evolved from a campaign led by Jewish Voice for Peace-Rhode Island to push Providence to divest from Israel Bonds. When allied city councilors introduced a similar divestment ordinance, it stalled out due to opposition from the outgoing mayor, Democrat Brett Smiley, who is a staunch supporter of Israel.


Divestment win in Providence, RI! This comes a week after divestment win in Cambridge, MA! The people of the US want to stop sending money to commit genocide against Palestinians -- our politicians disagree. These campaigns are way to get heard: let's keep it up!
56
Reply
Copy link


Goldman is also the first openly trans person to be elected to the Providence City Council. Speaking on the phone with Truthout while canvassing on Tuesday, Goldman repeatedly turned to speak to local residents and explain the importance of Question 7, both in English and in Spanish.

“As it was stalling out, we said, ‘how do we take this into our own hands, and get this on the ballot?’” Goldman said. “And so we talked with some of the folks from Pittsburgh who had done a ballot referendum, and also looked through the various rules in the Providence city charter, and decided to go the ballot initiative way.” Organizers also looked to the example of Somerville, Massachusetts, the first U.S. city to vote to divest from Israel last year.

In Providence, residents must collect 1,000 signatures to put an ordinance before city council — if the council does not pass the ordinance, it can be put on the ballot by collecting around 5,000 additional signatures. The Providence for Palestine coalition — which includes Jewish Voice for Peace-RI, the Democratic Socialists of America-RI, AFT Local 6516, American Muslims for Palestine MA/RI, and Reclaim RI — decided to go to the ballot rather than lobby council members, and ended up collecting over 10,000 signatures, more than double those required.

Adit Sabnis, a graduate student organizer at Brown University in AFT Local 6516, said that organizers at Brown and within Jewish Voice for Peace had “tried to find ways of divesting,” but “our leaders weren’t listening.” So they asked, “how can we take this power and put it into our own hands? How can we make the decision on this, rather than outsourcing it to them?” The coalition decided that “if the leaders won’t listen to us, we’re going to take it straight to the people.”



Brown University Gaza Solidarity Encampment, Providence, R.I., April 2024. (Kenneth C. Zirkel, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)


“What I think is unique is that I have not seen a lot of constituent-led ballot initiatives to try to fundamentally change how cities work. That being said, I know that a lot of city charters have mechanisms like this that will allow for [people in various cities across the U.S.] to be able to do direct democracy,” Goldman said.

“This is so important for the fact that we are in this moment where our elected officials are so often bought by corporate power” or otherwise facing pressure to ignore popular will, Goldman added.

While the outgoing mayor was a staunch supporter of Israel, the primaries brought forward several democratic socialist candidates for council, as well as for mayor. Sabnis explained that the divestment coalition coordinated with the David Morales mayoral campaign to canvass citywide. Throughout the process, the coalition “tried to find ways where we could bring regular people like us to show that we can really make a difference.”



Morales in 2025. (Rhode Island State Assembly /Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain)


Morales, a democratic socialist, won the election and will now become Providence’s youngest mayor, at age 28.

“This time, we have a majority city council as well as a mayor who are on board with divesting, which means that we will actually enforce this legislation,” Goldman said.

The local divestment campaign dovetailed with a citywide mobilization for rent stabilization, both policy priorities that the outgoing mayor blocked from becoming law and that the wave of progressive candidates made central to their platforms.

“I think it is very clear that the people of Providence want something new and want something different,” Goldman said. “While divestment and some of the issues like rent stabilization are maybe separate, it is similar in that a lot of people are not happy with how the status quo is going.”

The divestment initiative energized the campaigns of local candidates, strengthened Providence’s organizing movements, and demonstrated that there are ways to mobilize for change beyond electing individuals, Goldman added.

Activists in Providence have managed to connect local struggles with Palestine solidarity organizing. Palestinian community organizer and American Muslims for Palestine member Reem Said-Awad told Truthout that the coalition tied the fight for Palestine to Black Lives Matter and the struggle against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Over the past three years, more mainstream mobilizations in Providence like No Kings also began speaking about Palestine, she said.

“Things do change, if you are persistent,” Said-Awad said. “Even though we don’t have as many people on the streets right now, people are actively doing things behind the scenes. Awareness is there. Now it’s time for action.”

Sabnis said that the campaign for divestment has been met with an outpouring of support from Providence residents.

“Based on our leaders and politicians, it was very easy over the last two or three years to be very hopeless, and feel like we couldn’t do anything about [the genocide in Gaza],” Sabnis said. “I think the No. 1 thing we saw when we started going out in the community and collecting these signatures is that people were so happy and so thankful that we were organizing around this, but also just thrilled that they could actually do something meaningful for Palestine.”

“So often in the U.S., we’re told that the only way to make our voices heard is to ask elected leaders, and to beg them to abide by some semblance of a moral code,” Sabnis went on. “And so the fact that 10,000 people in Providence, if not more, could … take it all into their own hands, and say, ‘we’re going to reclaim our power. We’re no longer going to ask our leaders to do it if they’re not going to listen to us’ — to me, I think it’s emblematic of how democracy should be.”

Trump's new press officers

 


Donald Trump invited “violent fighter and warrior” Dana White to be White House press secretary—and asked him to bring his assistants. There used to be a gap between official presidential announcements and wacko absurdist jokes, but the two categories are now indistinguishable



Ex-CIA Officer Says The Agency Delivered The Same Iran Verdict Three Times Before The War






Ex-CIA Officer Says The Agency Delivered The Same Iran Verdict Three Times Before The War



by Tyler Durden
Sunday, Nov 08, 2026 - 10:30 AM


Former CIA officer John Kiriakou says the agency produced three separate national intelligence estimates before the Iran war began, and each one found that Tehran had no nuclear weapons program. He made the claim on the Nov. 6 "Intelligence Community Roundtable" edition of Judge Andrew Napolitano's Judging Freedom, alongside Larry Johnson.




Napolitano asked what the CIA had told the president "about the practical consequences of his plan with Netanyahu to win the war in six days." Kiriakou answered that "we know a little bit from leaks," then said: "the CIA had published three separate national intelligence estimates and all three times concluded that the Iranians did not have a nuclear weapons program. It just simply didn't exist."



Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told Congress in March 2025 that the intelligence community "continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," and Trump answered that he didn't "care what she said."

Kiriakou said the agency's analysts were just as consistent on what a war would cost. "The CIA was pretty consistent that this was a bad idea from the very beginning," he said, arguing that the analysis held "the Iranians were far tougher than we as policymakers believed." In his telling, a look at the map was enough: Iran is "the size as the whole of Western Europe," ringed by mountains on three sides, with "92 million people, all of whom will go to their deaths to protect their homeland." Conquering it, he said, would have taken "one million ground troops."

He also pointed to a leak from "less than three weeks ago." A CIA "red cell" team, the kind of group meant to "think outside the box," had concluded that "it was Israel that could break up and fall apart and cease to exist because of all of this, not Iran," Kiriakou said. The person who leaked it, he said, was a CIA contractor who passed it to his girlfriend, who put it in her blog. That matches the case of Ian Brinksman, the contractor the FBI arrested last month, as we reported. His case is ongoing, and Kiriakou's account of what the red cell concluded rests on the leaked reporting, not on a document we have seen.

The segment was part of a broader hour in which Johnson and Kiriakou argued that Trump's Iran policy cost Republicans in Tuesday's midterms. Both are known critics of the war, and the claims above are theirs.


The Machiavellian Evil of Satanyahu






Leak Reportedly Exposed Netanyahu & Mossad Chief's Plan To Attack Iran Before Israeli Election



by Tyler Durden
Sunday, Nov 08, 2026 - 03:00 PM


Via Middle East Eye


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Mossad chief Roman Gofman sought to carry out an operation against Iran on the eve of Israel's 27 October election, but the plan was thwarted after Washington was inadvertently alerted, Israeli media have reported.

A report by Channel 12 said the proposed operation was opposed by senior officials in Israel's security establishment, who feared it could trigger a major escalation with Iran and lead to the postponement of the vote. It said preparations nevertheless continued until an Israeli security operative mistakenly alerted the United States, prompting Washington to move quickly to stop the plan.


Getty Images/AFP


Netanyahu's office denied the account, saying: “The prime minister himself clarified in real time that an attack before the Israeli elections was not on the agenda.”

The report adds to allegations of tensions between Netanyahu and senior military officials over proposed action against Iran in the days before the election.

On October 25, two days before Israelis went to the polls, Channel 12 reported an "unprecedented confrontation" between Netanyahu and Israeli military chief of staff Eyal Zamir over a military action that defence officials feared could provoke a confrontation with Iran.

The network said Zamir had resisted carrying out the action and sought further deliberations, as well as signed documentation from Netanyahu confirming its legal authorization. A military source quoted by Channel 12 said: "This relates to an action that could lead to a flare-up with Iran, at a sensitive and dramatic moment, creating this [potential] miscalculation."

The report also cited unnamed sources who said military leaders were concerned that the political leadership was seeking to “utilize the Iranian issue for political benefit”.

On October 26, a day before the election, Channels 12 and 13 reported that Zamir was the only senior Israeli security chief to oppose military action sought by Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz, amid concerns that it could trigger an escalation with Iran and disrupt the vote.

The New York Times also reported that Netanyahu had "sought for weeks to orchestrate a new airstrike on Iran" but was blocked by Zamir. It said the military chief had become concerned that Netanyahu was pushing for a separate operation short of an overt strike, which Zamir believed could provoke an Iranian response.

Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, a critic of Netanyahu, said in an interview with Channel 12 on Thursday that the prime minister had planned to carry out “a provocation” involving Iran “via the Mossad, behind the back of the IDF chief of staff”.


Threat of renewed strikes

The reports of the alleged operation come amid diplomatic efforts to end the war between the United States and Iran, with Qatar mediating between the two sides as Washington weighs its next steps.

On November 1, Channel 12 reported that Netanyahu had urged US President Donald Trump to resume the war against Iran immediately after the 3 November US midterm elections. The report, citing Israeli and American sources familiar with a phone call between the leaders, said Trump wanted to give negotiations with Tehran more time.

Netanyahu reportedly feared that a diplomatic agreement could lead to a significant easing of pressure on Iran, while Trump wanted Israel to avoid disrupting the negotiations. Qatar's mediation efforts have continued since the US midterm elections.

Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani said on Saturday that Washington remained willing to reach an agreement with Tehran and that significant progress had been made. “We cannot wait to reach a perfect agreement; we hope to reach a good agreement,” he said, according to Reuters.

Trump said on Friday that the United States was talking to Iran, while insisting that Washington had the upper hand in the conflict. “We've beaten Iran. We are doing very well with Iran. We're talking to Iran. We haven't lost a soldier in six or seven months,” he told reporters outside the White House.

He also repeated his claim that “Israel and, in fact, the entire Middle East, WOULD NOT EXIST TODAY if I did not stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon”.


US launches task force to disrupt Iran’s land-based supply routes

 


US launches task force to disrupt Iran’s land-based supply routes

The operation is to prevent Iran from using ground routes to transport weapons and other materials, US Central Command says.

Save

FILE PHOTO: Vessels at the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, November 3, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer/File Photo
Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman [File: Stringer/ Reuters]

The United States military’s Central Command (CENTCOM) has announced a plan to block Iran’s land-based supply routes, expanding its months-long naval blockade of Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz.

CENTCOM, which oversees US military operations in the Middle East, announced on Saturday that it had established a new task force “to prevent Iran from using ground routes to transport advanced weapons and other materials”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Task Force Iron Gate will reinforce “the success of our ironclad blockade against Iran at sea”, CENTCOM Commander Admiral Brad Cooper said.

Based in Tampa, Florida, the task force will coordinate with other US government agencies “on preventing the movement of advanced weapons systems, dual-use technologies, sanctioned materials, and illegal revenue streams across Iran’s land borders and the Caspian Sea”, CENTCOM said.

Michael Mulroy, a former US deputy assistant defence secretary for the Middle East, told Al Jazeera the task force’s role will be to find out where “weapons systems are coming in, how they could potentially be cut off”, and how “Iran is transporting its energy”.

He added that if US President Donald Trump orders an escalation to the war, it will likely be attacks on this “series of targets”.

“Unlike Operation Epic Fury, which primarily focuses on military targets, I think these targets will be focused on economic and infrastructure targets, as part of this comprehensive plan to cut the regime off from its ability to fight and ability to fund itself,” Mulroy told Al Jazeera.

CENTCOM separately said on Saturday that it had disabled a commercial cargo vessel in the Gulf of Oman as part of its blockade of Iranian ports.

A US “military aircraft fired precision munitions at the stern of St. Kitts-flagged M/V Huda, disabling the ship after CENTCOM forces directed the crew to abandon targeted spaces”, it said in a statement.

“Enforcement actions since July have resulted in U.S. forces redirecting 147 commercial vessels that complied”, and disabling “five merchant ships that refused to comply”, it added.

Explosions reported

On Saturday, Iran’s official news agency IRNA reported the sound of two explosions on Qeshm Island, located in the Strait of Hormuz.

IRNA also reported the sound of “several explosions” in the cities of Jask, Sirik and Bandar Abbas.

Trump confirmed new strikes on Qeshm Island a day earlier, but downplayed them as “minor”. He added that Tehran still wants a deal as Qatari-mediated talks continue.

0:46
Trump confirms US strikes in Iran, insists ‘it’s not a war’


Meanwhile, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy reported that two oil tankers struck mines near the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday.

Iranian state television, citing the navy, said the tankers had passed through an “unsafe” part of the strait with their navigation systems off. They “suffered severe damage and stopped after hitting sea mines”.