Putin Agrees to Resume Peace Talks With Ukraine

 

Putin Agrees to Resume Peace Talks With Ukraine

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to resume US-mediated peace talks with Ukraine as soon as next month following a meeting Wednesday with US special envoy Steve Witkoff in St. Petersburg, according to the Kremlin. The proposed trilateral talks could begin on or after November 10 in Abu Dhabi and would focus on security arrangements for Russia and Ukraine after the war ends.

The nearly three-hour meeting marked Witkoff’s ninth in-person meeting with Putin. It followed talks in Oslo a day earlier between Witkoff, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the leaders of Finland and Norway, and European and NATO representatives.

A US official said Ukraine brought new proposals covering security guarantees, a postwar economic plan and broader European security arrangements. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said the proposals did not fully satisfy Moscow.

During the meeting, Putin offered to help Trump address Iran’s nuclear program and said Russia could supply large quantities of fertilizer to US farmers. The two sides also discussed a possible meeting in China next month involving Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Putin has maintained Russia’s demands for control of Ukraine’s Donetsk region and for Ukraine to remain outside NATO, while Trump has increased pressure on Kyiv to reach a peace agreement.

Turkey Plans Parliamentary Mandate to Deploy Military Personnel to Saudi Arabia Under Defense Pact

 

Turkey Plans Parliamentary Mandate to Deploy Military Personnel to Saudi Arabia Under Defense Pact

 

Turkey plans to seek parliamentary authorization to deploy military personnel to Saudi Arabia under a joint defense agreement with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, a ruling-party lawmaker told Reuters on Wednesday.

Turkey submitted the Mecca Joint Defense Agreement to parliament for ratification on Tuesday. The lawmaker said the separate deployment mandate would be submitted after parliament approves the agreement.

The three countries signed the pact on August 7, establishing a mutual-defense commitment under which an armed attack on one member would be treated as an attack on all three. The agreement brings NATO member Turkey, Saudi Arabia and nuclear-armed Pakistan into a trilateral defense arrangement as Saudi Arabia faces missile and drone attacks from Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi movement.

Under the proposed Turkish contribution, technical personnel and specialists would initially support Saudi air defenses, electronic warfare capabilities and other defensive systems. A Turkish ruling-party lawmaker said personnel deployed under the agreement would not participate in offensive operations. Turkish officials have also discussed military equipment, intelligence sharing and weapons systems as potential forms of support.

The agreement comes as the three countries expand military coordination in response to regional security threats. Pakistan has confirmed that its forces are serving in Saudi Arabia under the pact, while Turkey has been assessing how to assist the kingdom. Turkey has also agreed to join a Saudi-led coalition focused on protecting navigation in the Red Sea.

GhostofBasedPatrickHenry: At every step of the Mecca Agreement process, shills online have mocked and ridiculed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman for believing that Turkey or anyone else would ever come to their aid in a military capacity. There have been countless psyops deployed by various entities claiming that Turkey had reneged on the agreement, or that the agreement was all for show, or that the Muslims had no honor and wouldn’t follow through on their promises. (I assume all of these ops were orchestrated by the CIA and Mossad.)

Well who’s laughing now? The Turkish military is now going to be in Saudi Arabia, which puts them right on the doorstep of Israel.

Israel is having an election next week in which pretty much every major candidate has forecast a military conflict with Turkey. Well it’s easy to run your mouth when the Turkish military is hundreds of miles away and Erdogan’s threatening rhetoric seems performative.

It’s another thing when the Turkish military—which is the largest military not only in the Middle East, but also in Europe—has you completely surrounded. What do I mean by that? Take a look at the map below.

As the article explained, in addition to the Mecca Agreement, Turkey also joined the Saudi-led Red Sea naval coalition, so it’s likely that the Turkish navy is already in the Red Sea and around the Gulf of Acaba (southern tip of Israel) as well as in the eastern Mediterranean. It’s likely that we’ll see a ramp-up of those forces, and that ground forces will be brought in by both air and sea. The Turkish military has been on the ground in Syria since the “fall” of Assad, which Israel loves to whine about, and now it would be very easy to deploy ground troops on the Sinai Peninsula (Egypt) as well as in the Jordanian desert.

Simply put, Turkey has the numbers to completely surround Israel while also aiding the Saudis with whatever tomfoolery is happening down in Yemen. And this is before Pakistan or Egypt even get involved.

So I guess the question now is, what is Israel going to do? Will the winner of this upcoming election (whether it’s Netanyahu or Naftali Bennett or Gadi Eisenkot) follow through on their respective promises to flex on Turkey and fight them in Syria? The IDF still hasn’t even defeated Hamas. Apparently they are still kicking around. How the hell are they going to contend with one of the largest militaries in the world, especially when that military is already deployed in the Red Sea and on the Arabian Peninsula? And didn’t Trump just say that if Netanyahu loses the election then the US is going to pull out and stop fighting Iran?

How easy would it be for the Turks to embargo Israel—which is completely dependent on imported products (including food) to sustain its population?

US Evacuating US Military Bases in the Middle East in Preparation of More War With Iran

 

US Evacuating US Military Bases in the Middle East in Preparation of More War With Iran

 

The United States has moved some troops off bases in the Middle East amid threats from Iran and Yemen’s Houthi militants, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing unnamed officials familiar with military planning. US Central Command spokesman Capt. Tim Hawkins said the military routinely moves assets but does not discuss those movements for operational security reasons.

The State Department also ordered nonessential diplomats and government employees’ families to leave Saudi Arabia following deadly Houthi attacks, according to Ukrainian National News. The department cited strikes on civilian airports and other critical infrastructure that caused casualties and severe travel disruptions.

NBC News reported that personnel reductions were taking place as President Donald Trump considered further military action against Iran. The sources did not establish that Trump had made a final decision. The reported movements involve some personnel, rather than a complete US withdrawal from the region.

GhostofBasedPatrickHenry: Okay, I want everyone to slow down, and read that headline very slowly.

Now read it again.

Now read it a third time.

When was the last time that a war was fought where military assets were preemptively withdrawn from the theater, while the attack plans were announced by the media?

Yes, guys, we are preparing for another major escalation with Iran... by pulling all of our warfighters and equipment out of the region.

The amazing part is that people are so deeply brainwashed (even within the “Truth” Community) that they just lap up these narratives without question.

My best guess is that, like before, this Iran War narrative is a cover story to explain the peaceful transfer of power from the Unipolar Hegemony (physically represented by the US military) to the Multipolar World Order.

Foreign countries have long allowed US military bases on their land because it offered power projection and deterrence. Nobody would attack them if they had a US military base in their backyard. But this Iran War storyline has challenged and upended that premise, as Arab countries (and the world) now widely recognize that hosting a US military base is actually a major liability, because they become targets when the US is engaged in a war with a third party. Even if your country possesses a vital natural resource—like oil—that is deeply connected to the world economy, that will not be enough incentive for the US military to come in, guns blazing, to defend you from said third party.

If Saudi Arabia can’t get adequate military protection—which was the foundational promise made by Henry Kissinger to King Faisal in 1974 when he negotiated the Petro Dollar Deal—what hope does some random third world nation have? Why would any country ever again agree to host a US military base?

By the way, all of this is a good thing. America became the globalists’ world police because the globalists were able to establish some 800+ military bases around the world. Without those outposts, it’s going to be much harder to get the US sucked into a forever war.

P.S. Since 2015, President Trump has mocked Barack Obama for announcing his military plans in the media prior to attacking. Trump has always promised that he would never do that. So anytime you hear a news story claiming Trump is about to attack something, you know it is absolute bullshit.

Ramanan hits back at Rafizi's challenge to sue, calls it 'political distraction 101'

Ramanan hits back at Rafizi's challenge to sue, calls it 'political distraction 101'

Qistina Nadia Dzulqarnain

Published: Oct 22, 2026 8:00 PM


PKR vice-president R Ramanan has hit back at Rafizi Ramli, who recently doubled down on his challenge for the human resources minister to initiate legal action against him over corruption allegations linked to the “corporate mafia”.

Ramanan’s pointed remarks against Rafizi came after lawmakers in the Dewan Rakyat on Oct 20 referenced the former PKR deputy minister’s claims that a PKR MP had received RM9.5 million to act as an intermediary in disputes linked to the alleged corporate mafia.

Addressing the lower house, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had dismissed the allegation as an unsubstantiated political claim. While Anwar, who is PKR president, did not name anyone, Ramanan had previously denied accusations that he was the PKR MP in question.

Following the exchange in the Dewan Rakyat, Rafizi said in a statement that he has not yet received any legal notice from Ramanan over the matter, contrary to Anwar’s claim that legal proceedings are underway.


READ MORE: PM vows to release 'corporate mafia' probe findings in 3 months, even if Azam, Farhash named


Not suing Rafizi to 'avoid burdening rakyat'

Ramanan today stressed that he has no intention to haul Rafizi to court, arguing instead that the Bersama co-leader should file a report with authorities if he believes he has credible evidence to support his claims.
Rafizi Ramli

“I don’t want to take any legal action - once (Rafizi) loses in court, he will do a donation drive and ask for the rakyat’s money to help him avoid bankruptcy.


“So if I sue him, who am I actually burdening? The rakyat!” Ramanan claimed during a press conference after officiating an appreciation event for Human Resources Ministry personnel in Kuala Lumpur today.


READ MORE: Ramanan: 'Coward' Rafizi using cybertroopers to split PKR with 'evil agenda'


The Sungai Buloh MP said that contrary to Rafizi’s “style of dirty politics”, he is “thankful” that he is not facing any difficulties and can serve the rakyat without accepting a salary or any allowances.


He also claimed that while Rafizi appears quick to urge others to take legal action, the latter has yet to initiate such action against those who accused him of accepting RM500,000 in bribes linked to Datasonic Group Bhd, now known as NexG Bhd.


'Distraction 101'

Ramanan further accused Rafizi of seemingly harping on issues allegedly implicating other individuals, including Anwar and his former aide Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak, to “cover up” supposed transgressions involving the former economy minister and his Bersama peers.

Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak


“It’s political distraction 101,” Ramanan said, pointing to Rafizi’s previous statement raising concerns about tech company Zetrix AI’s financial crisis.

READ MORE: Rafizi demands PM come clean on Zetrix AI losses, immigration system's future


Besides the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) ongoing khalwat investigation against Bersama co-leader Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, Ramanan also referred the MACC’s probe into the government’s RM1.1 billion deal with semiconductor firm Arm Holdings.

“Rafizi says the Zetrix AI issue is bigger than 1MDB - he is a mangkuk hayun that is not clever at all (as) the matter involves corporate governance, but he is trying to sensationalise it (to cover up news on other cases).

“What kind of a human is (Rafizi)? Does he not understand? Let me teach him: the sin of slander is bigger than the sin of killing, and is condemned even by the Prophet,” Ramanan added.


He also pressed Rafizi to address rumours that the other individual involved in Nik Nazmi’s case held a high-ranking position in a foundation under the Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Ministry during the former Setiawangsa MP’s tenure as its minister.

Ramanan emphasised that Rafizi should state whether the foundation has been audited to avoid claims of “failed governance, gross negligence, and immorality.”

“I would like to advise this hantu raya (Rafizi) - take care of yourself and look at your surroundings first. Don’t create stories here and there (just to) cover up the mess that you have created,” Ramanan added.

Ismail denies he resigned as MB

Ismail denies he resigned as MB

N Faizal Ghazali

Published: Oct 22, 2026 9:28 PM


Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar Ismail Lasim has denied China Press’ report that he has signed his resignation letter amid a leadership and administration crisis in the state.

“This is just political games, not true. I did not resign,” he told Malaysiakini when contacted on WhatsApp.

Earlier, the Chinese-language daily published an article titled “Ismail Lasim has signed resignation letter” concerning the Negeri Sembilan royal crisis, as speculation about a possible change of menteri besar by next week swirls.

The dispute, which began in April, saw customary territorial chieftains (undang) proclaiming the abdication of Yang di-Pertuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, with Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar succeeding as state ruler.


Ismail’s role in the crisis has been controversial, as he initially claimed to have signed the proclamation removing Tuanku Muhriz under duress but later declared it valid along with his state executive council.

Tuanku Muhriz revoked the appointment of the entire exco except Ismail on Sept 20 in response, decreeing the menteri besar to submit to him a new list of names, which has yet to be fulfilled.

A screen capture of a video showing Negeri Sembilan ruler Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir giving Menteri Besar Ismail Lasim an earful on Oct 16

The state ruler was also recently seen on video giving Ismail a public dressing-down over his shifting allegiance in the royal and customary dispute.


'Who's their source?'

Lenggeng assemblyperson Asna Amin similarly denied the report to Malaysiakini and described it as mere gossip.

“The menteri besar said no such thing; this is gossip,” he said.

Ismail’s press secretary, Fasha Musthafa, also denied the report and questioned the newspaper's source of information.


“The menteri besar is working as usual today. Where did China Press get its source (for the report)? (This is) not true,” he told Malaysiakini.

Meanwhile, Negeri Sembilan Umno chairperson Jalaluddin Alias today emphasised that all parties should give space to the state leadership to resolve its own affairs.

The Jelebu MP made the statement in Dewan Rakyat when responding to Hulu Terengganu MP Rosol Wahid, who raised the matter in Parliament.

“Hulu Terengganu does not need to worry; this matter will be resolved. Let Negeri Sembilan settle its own affairs,” said Jalaluddin, who is also Pertang assemblyperson.

When a pro-Modi Indian media 'stings' Zakir in Putrajaya

When a pro-Modi Indian media 'stings' Zakir in Putrajaya

Published: Oct 22, 2026 3:37 PM


On Oct 13, a senior journalist from India’s The Republic Media Network, widely regarded as sympathetic to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), travelled to Putrajaya to meet Zakir Naik.

The Indian-born Muslim preacher, who resides in Malaysia, remains a wanted man in India, where he faces allegations that have fuelled a protracted legal and diplomatic saga between the two countries.

The journalist, Anirudda Bhakat, claimed that Zakir, his associates, and family members occupy the entire 21st floor of a condominium tower.

The Republic described the meeting between its journalist and the preacher as a “sting”.

Their conversation appeared to be secretly recorded, and the subsequent report portrayed Zakir as sympathetic to India’s opposition All India Congress Party and supportive of demonstrations in New Delhi.

The demonstrations were organised by the youth-led Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), a satirical political movement that has since grown into a wider campaign against the government.


The movement has been at the forefront of protests over alleged manipulation of voter rolls and calls for the resignation of India’s chief election commissioner.

'BJP goes first'

Asked by the journalist when he intends to return to India, Zakir was blunt about what needs to happen first.

“After BJP goes… Before that, if I come home, I won’t be able to come out of the country,” he said.

Addressing the allegations against him, including money laundering charges and hate-speech cases, the preacher maintained that they were baseless.


“They are allegations. There is no proof,” Zakir said, adding that he was willing to provide a witness statement via video, but Indian authorities insisted that he do so in person.

“If I come in person, I won’t come out... I will be inside only; they won’t give me (a) trial,” he added.


Turning to the protests sweeping India, Zakir said mounting public anger would spell trouble for the ruling BJP.

“I don’t think BJP will survive till the next elections. If it survives, it won’t win (the elections). Inshallah. Elections are due in 2029; they may go before that also. Next year,” he said.

Asked whether he hoped Congress would return to power, Zakir said the party led by Rahul Gandhi was preferable to the BJP.

But he stopped short of offering an unqualified endorsement of Rahul’s leadership, describing him as not yet a “seasoned or experienced” politician.

“But he is better than Modi. He is one person who is honest; he is not corrupt, and he doesn’t cheat. That simple.

“The country is in a very bad situation, economically, financially... too much unemployment… the rupee has devalued a lot,” he added.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Towards the end of the conversation, Zakir told the journalist that he expected to deliver his next sermon in Bangladesh soon.

It remains unclear whether the preacher knew he was speaking to a journalist, as the circumstances surrounding their meeting were never made clear.


Permanent resident

Zakir was granted Malaysian permanent resident status in 2015.

His relocation to Malaysia came amid mounting scrutiny in India over his sermons and the activities of his Islamic Research Foundation, which Indian authorities declared unlawful in 2016.

Indian authorities subsequently pursued money laundering allegations against him and sought his extradition.

In 2018, then prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad defended Malaysia’s decision not to send Zakir back, saying the country had the right to refuse extradition. The government’s position was that he could remain as long as he did not cause problems in Malaysia.

Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad


Last month, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said he had discussed Zakir’s extradition with representatives from India.

According to Indian news site New Delhi Television, Anwar confirmed that engagements on the matter had been held in “private discussions” believed to have taken place in New Delhi.

“We thought we should keep it very private to protect the interests of both nations. But we, of course, put it on the priority list for building trust and relationship between our countries,” he was quoted as saying.

He added that any potential action on India’s extradition request must be done “very cautiously”, in a way that respects the rule of law and the importance of bilateral relations.

 

Forget Zahid and BN, go solo in GE16, Zaid urges PAS

Forget Zahid and BN, go solo in GE16, Zaid urges PAS

3 hours ago

FMT Reporters

The former Kota Bharu MP claims BN chairman Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is insincere about working with PAS, which he believes can win 60 parliamentary seats in GE16 on its own.

Former Kota Bharu MP Zaid Ibrahim claimed BN chairman Ahmad Zahid Hamidi is ‘Anwar Ibrahim’s man yesterday, today and forever’.

PETALING JAYA:

Former Kota Bharu MP Zaid Ibrahim has urged PAS to go solo in the next general election (GE16) instead of forging an alliance with Barisan Nasional.

Zaid, who used to be in Umno but is now in PAS, claimed that BN chairman Ahmad Zahid Hamidi was insincere about working with the Islamic party.

He also believed PAS was capable of winning 60 parliamentary seats in the peninsula on its own in GE16.

After the polls, PAS can form the government with parties in Sabah and Sarawak by offering them a “fair deal” on matters critical to the development of both states, Zaid added.

“The Umno president (Zahid) once again decided not to attend an important event with PAS this Friday. Earlier, it was a much-touted presence at the PAS muktamar that did not materialise.

“You mean PAS still harbours hope? Zahid is (Prime Minister) Anwar Ibrahim’s man yesterday, today and forever. I know it’s difficult, but PAS should focus on winning 60 parliamentary seats in the peninsula on its own.

“Working with Zahid does not guarantee Anwar will not remain in power. Zahid, in fact, is inclined to keep Anwar in power. So what does PAS want?” he said in a Facebook post.

Zaid was responding to reports that Zahid had cancelled his attendance at a mega “ummah unity” event organised by PAS at the Sultan Muhammad IV Stadium in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, this Friday.

The deputy prime minister was supposed to deliver a speech, along with PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang, while over 100,000 are expected to attend the event.

The gathering will commemorate 36 years of Kelantan being governed by PAS.

Yesterday, Zahid confirmed that BN would form an alliance with “PAS and friends” for the Melaka polls.

The Umno president said the Umno-led coalition would contest 21 of the 28 seats up for grabs while PAS and its Perikatan Nasional allies would vie for the remaining seven.

However, PN secretary-general Takiyuddin Hassan denied that the distribution of seats had been finalised, saying further negotiations are ongoing to refine the pact.

 

Jawi seeks to overturn RM160,000 award to Siti Kasim

Jawi seeks to overturn RM160,000 award to Siti Kasim

4 hours ago

FMT Reporters

The federal territories Islamic religious department argues that even if its officers erred in arresting the activist in 2016, this does not constitute an abuse of power.

On July 18 last year, the High Court awarded Siti Kasim RM160,000 in damages and RM100,000 in legal costs after ruling in her favour in a civil suit against Jawi.

PETALING JAYA:

The federal territories Islamic religious department (Jawi) and 22 others have asked the Court of Appeal to overturn a ruling ordering them to pay lawyer and activist Siti Kasim RM160,000 for her wrongful arrest and detention in 2016.

Berita Harian reported that senior federal counsel Ng Siew Wee, representing Jawi, 15 of its officers and seven others, told the court that the officers were only trying to enforce a religious ruling, or fatwa.

She said even if the officers had misunderstood the law, an honest mistake should not automatically be treated as an abuse of power.

“An honest mistake about the law is not misconduct in public office,” she said.

Ng also said there was no evidence that the Jawi officers who lodged a police report against Siti had acted dishonestly to have her charged with obstructing a public servant.

She argued that the High Court judge had erred in assessing witness testimony and relying on evidence from an earlier criminal case.

However, Siti’s lawyer, A Saha Deva, said the officers went ahead with the raid without checking whether they had the legal authority to do so.

“They did not care whether they had the authority or not. They went ahead with the raid anyway,” he said.

Saha Deva said the High Court had properly considered the evidence and applied the law in finding the officers had misused their powers.

The case dates back to April 3, 2016, when Siti was arrested during a Jawi raid on a private fundraising dinner. She was taken to the Dang Wangi police headquarters and held for about four hours before being released.

She was later charged with obstructing a Jawi officer from carrying out official duties, but was acquitted by the magistrates’ court in August 2020 after the prosecution failed to establish a case against her.

Siti filed a civil suit against Jawi and the government in September 2019, claiming compensation for wrongful arrest and illegal detention, saying she had only been carrying out her duties as a lawyer during the raid.

On July 18 last year, the High Court ruled in her favour and awarded her RM160,000 in damages and RM100,000 in legal costs.

The three-member Court of Appeal bench chaired by Justice Noorin Badaruddin, sitting with Justices Shahnaz Sulaiman and Meor Hashimi Abdul Hamid, fixed Nov 5 for case management to determine the date of its decision.