Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Stung by Iran war, Trump heads to China in need of wins as summit with Xi looms





Stung by Iran war, Trump heads to China in need of wins as summit with Xi looms



US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping react as they hold a bilateral meeting at Gimhae International Airport, on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) summit, in Busan, South Korea October 30, 2025. — Reuters pic

Wednesday, 13 May 2026 7:00 AM MYT


  • Trump and Xi will hold talks on May 14-15
  • Leaders seek to extend fragile trade truce
  • Trump wants Xi’s help to end unpopular Iran war
  • Low expectations reflect Trump’s struggles, analysts say


BEIJING, May 13 — A year ago, US President Donald ‌Trump predicted that towering trade tariffs would bring America’s main economic rival to heel.

He heads to China this week with that ambition blunted by court rulings, narrowing his goals to a few deals on beans, beef and Boeing jets, and enlisting China’s help to resolve his unpopular Iran war, political analysts say.

The modest expectations for Trump’s May 14-15 meetings with Xi Jinping — the first since they paused a bruising trade war in October — underscore how Trump’s bombastic ‌approach has failed to deliver an advantage ahead of the talks, according to analysts.

Trump “kind of needs China more than China needs him,” said Alejandro Reyes, a professor specialising in Chinese foreign policy at the University of Hong Kong.


“He needs a kind of foreign policy victory: a victory that shows that he is looking to ensure stability in the world and that he’s not just disrupting global politics,” Reyes added.


Since their last brief meeting at an airbase in South Korea where Trump suspended triple-digit tariffs on Chinese goods and Xi backed away from choking global supplies of rare earths, China has quietly sharpened its economic pressure toolkit aimed at Washington.

Trump, meanwhile, has been preoccupied fighting US court rulings against his tariffs and a war with Iran that has sapped his approval ratings ahead of November’s midterm elections.


This week’s meeting in the Chinese capital will be a grander occasion, with the leaders set to hold a summit at the Great Hall of the People, tour Unesco-heritage site Temple of Heaven, dine at a state banquet and take tea and lunch together.

But the anticipated economic deliverables amount to a handful of deals and mechanisms to manage future trade, while it remains unclear whether the leaders will even agree to extend their trade truce, officials involved in the planning said.

Trump will be joined by CEOs including Tesla’s Elon Musk and Apple’s Tim Cook, though the business delegation is smaller than when he last visited ‌Beijing in 2017.

Aside from trade, Trump said on Monday he will discuss arms sales to Taiwan and the case of jailed media tycoon Jimmy Lai with Xi. Families of two Americans imprisoned in ⁠China for more than a decade are also urging Trump to seek their release.

“We used to be ⁠taken advantage of for years with our previous presidents, and now we’re doing great with China,” Trump said. “I respect him (Xi) a lot, and ⁠hopefully he respects me.”

One battle after another

The mood music has changed ⁠dramatically since Trump declared in a Truth Social ⁠post in April 2025 that his tariffs would make China realise that the “days of ripping off” the United States were over.

Those levies prompted Beijing to restrict exports of rare earths, brutally exposing the West’s dependency on elements vital to the manufacturing of everything from electric cars to weapons, and eventually led to Trump and Xi’s fragile truce.

Since then, Trump has faced countless other battles: capturing Venezuela’s leader, threatening to annex fellow Nato member ⁠Greenland and waging a war on Iran that has plunged the Middle East into chaos and stoked a global energy crisis.

More than 60 per cent of Americans disapprove of his Iran war, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey last month.

Now, Trump wants China to convince Tehran to make a deal with Washington to end the conflict. China maintains ties with Iran and remains a major consumer of its oil exports.

Matt Pottinger, who served as deputy national security advisor during Trump’s first term, told a forum in Taipei last week that while China would like to see an outcome that weakens American power it is not immune to the economic cost of a protracted conflict.

But Beijing will want something in return, and top of Xi’s agenda is Taiwan, the democratically governed island claimed by China.

While some fear a bargain that ⁠could embolden China to take Taiwan by force, even a nuanced change in Washington’s wording would raise anxiety about the commitment of Taipei’s most important backer that would reverberate across other US allies in Asia.

Wu Xinbo, a professor at Fudan University in Shanghai who serves on the policy advisory board of China’s foreign ministry, said Trump should make clear that ⁠he “won’t support independence or take actions that encourage a separatist political agenda”.

‘Superficial ceasefire’


China also wants the Trump administration to commit to not taking future retaliatory trade action such as technology export controls, and to roll back ⁠existing controls on chipmaking equipment and ⁠advanced memory chips, people briefed on the talks said.

And since last October, Beijing has been expanding its own economic leverage, such as enacting laws to punish foreign entities that shift supply chains away from China and tightening its rare earth licensing regime.

A majority of Americans (53 per cent) now say the United States should undertake friendly cooperation and engagement with China, up from 40 per cent in 2024, according to a survey by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs published in October.

So ‌just keeping relations on an even keel and extending the trade war truce could be enough for Trump to claim a win.

That leaves the main outcome likely to be “a superficial ceasefire that is largely to China’s advantage,” said Scott Kennedy of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington. — Reuters

What if we eradicated mosquitoes? Experts debate exterminating a species that kills 760,000 people a year




What if we eradicated mosquitoes? Experts debate exterminating a species that kills 760,000 people a year



A child with rashes on the legs and infected with dengue rests at a hospital ward in Manila on February 19, 2025. — AFP pic

Wednesday, 13 May 2026 7:00 AM MYT


  • Mosquitoes kill around 760,000 people yearly, spreading diseases worsened by climate change and expanding into new regions.
  • Scientists are testing gene-drive and Wolbachia technologies to suppress mosquito populations or stop disease transmission safely.
  • Experts warn mosquito control alone is insufficient without stronger healthcare, vaccines, housing and sustained international funding.


PARIS, May 13 — The deadliest animals are not lions, spiders or snakes, but the tiny mosquitoes that suck our blood, make us itchy and infect us with disease.


Mosquitoes kill around 760,000 people every year, according to research site Our World in Data, with humans ourselves coming a distant second.


This is because mosquitoes account for 17 per cent of all infectious diseases, including malaria, dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya and Zika.

And as the world warms due to human-driven climate change, mosquitoes are roaming to new areas during longer summers, raising fears they could propel future health crises.


So how can humanity fight back against our greatest foe? Is there a safe way we could eradicate these killer mosquitoes – and how bad would that be for the environment?


#Notallmosquitoes

First, we would not need to vanquish all mosquitoes. Out of roughly 3,500 mosquito species, only around 100 bite humans.


And just five species are responsible for roughly 95 per cent of human infections, Hilary Ranson, a vector biologist at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, told AFP.

On balance, Ranson felt that losing five mosquito species “could be tolerated given the huge devastation” they inflict on the world, from mass death to crippling economic fallout.

Dan Peach, a mosquito entomologist at the University of Georgia, broadly agreed, but emphasised that more information was needed to compare eradication with the alternatives.



A soldier sprays insecticide to combat Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in a house in San Salvador on October 9, 2024. — AFP pic



What about the environment?

The five disease-spreading mosquitoes “have evolved to be very closely associated to humans,” including feeding on and breeding near us, Ranson explained.

This means eradicating them would not have a major impact on the broader ecosystem – and other, genetically similar but less deadly mosquitoes would likely quickly “fill that ecological niche”, she added.

Peach was not convinced we know enough “about the ecology of most mosquito species to be confident one way or the other, but I also think that it is OK to acknowledge this and still proceed.”

Mosquitoes do “transfer nutrients from their aquatic larval habitats” to other areas, and serve as food for insects, fish and other animals, he said.

They also pollinate plants, but this “isn’t well understood and may vary by species”, Peach added.

Ranson acknowledged there is a valid debate over the ethics of humans committing “specicide”, while pointing out that we are currently unintentionally wiping out a huge number of species.



Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia bacteria are released by a technician from the Federal District’s Health Department in a residential area of Brasilia on March 10, 2026. — AFP pic



How can it be done?


One of the most prominent new technological options is called gene-drive, which involves genetically modifying animals so that they pass down a particular trait to their offspring.

When scientists tweaked females of malaria-carrying Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes to make them infertile, it wiped out a population in the lab over just a few generations.

Target Malaria, funded by the Gates Foundation, has tested this technology in several African countries.

However the effort was dealt a major blow last year when Burkina Faso’s military-led government ended testing in the country, where it had been criticised by civil society groups and targeted by disinformation campaigns.

Another strategy involves infecting Aedes aegypti mosquitoes with the bacteria Wolbachia. This can crash their population – or simply reduce their ability to transmit dengue.

This raises another question: do we actually need to kill them?



An Aedes aegypti mosquito is pictured at a laboratory of the Center for Parasitological and Vector Studies of the national scientific research institute CONICET in La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina on March 26, 2024. — AFP pic



What if we made them harmless instead?


When Wolbachia-infected sterile mosquitoes were released in the Brazilian city of Niteroi, there was an 89 per cent drop in dengue cases, research showed last year.

More than 16 million people across 15 countries have now been protected by these mosquitoes, with “no negative consequences”, Scott O’Neill, founder of the World Mosquito Program, told AFP.

Meanwhile, a project called Transmission Zero is trying to use gene-drive technology to make it so that Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes no longer spread malaria.

Lab research published in Nature late last year suggested the scientists are getting closer to this goal, with the team planning to launch an in-country trial in 2030.

The Burkina Faso setback showed that these projects must have some “political support or buy-in” from the countries where they are tested, study author Dickson Wilson Lwetoijera of Tanzania’s Ifakara Health Institute told AFP.


No ‘magic bullet’

Rather than just relying on a technological “magic bullet”, usually funded by the Gates Foundation, Ranson called for a more “holistic solution” for these diseases.

This would require giving people in disease-hit countries more access to treatment, diagnosis, better housing and better vaccines, she said.

However sweeping foreign aid cuts by Western countries have threatened progress against most mosquito-borne diseases over the last year, humanitarian organisations have warned. — AFP


Jho Low seeks Trump pardon in bid to clear US criminal charges





Jho Low seeks Trump pardon in bid to clear US criminal charges



An undated file photograph of fugitive financier Low Taek Jho. — Picture via Facebook

Wednesday, 13 May 2026 8:53 AM MYT


NEW YORK, May 13 — Malaysian financier Low Taek ‌Jho, widely known as Jho Low and now a ‌fugitive, has sought a pardon from US President Donald Trump, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported yesterday.

Reuters could not immediately verify the report.

The request was filed in recent ‌weeks, the Journal said, citing ⁠people familiar ⁠with the ⁠matter, and if ⁠granted ⁠would remove US criminal charges against him.

A Justice ⁠Department website lists a pending request for a “Pardon after Completion of Sentence” under Taek Jho ⁠Low that was filed this year, the report said.

A ⁠White House official said Low’s ⁠request ⁠was not currently on the White House’s radar, ‌WSJ added. — Reuters


Eurovision boycott widens as Spain, Ireland and Slovenia decline to show 70th anniversary event over voting integrity and Gaza war






Eurovision boycott widens as Spain, Ireland and Slovenia decline to show 70th anniversary event over voting integrity and Gaza war



Fans attend the opening ceremony of the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 at the City Hall Square in Vienna May 10, 2026. — AFP pic

Tuesday, 12 May 2026 3:58 PM MYT


VIENNA, May 12 — The public broadcasters for Spain, Ireland and Slovenia said yesterday they will not show the 70th anniversary Eurovision Song Contest this week, as they boycott the TV extravaganza over Israel’s participation.


The three countries, along with the Netherlands and Iceland, pulled out of this year’s event in Vienna, which kicks off today and culminates in Saturday’s grand final.


Israel’s war in the Gaza Strip prompted the five countries to withdraw from the world’s biggest live televised music event — with Eurovision director Martin Green vowing to do “anything in our power to find a pathway back” for them.

Suspicions were also raised that the public televoting system was being manipulated to boost Israel at Eurovision 2025 in Basel, Switzerland. Furthermore, some broadcasters voiced concerns about media freedom, with Israel preventing their journalists from accessing Gaza.


“Instead of the Eurovision circus, the national television programme will be coloured by the thematic programme series ‘Voices of Palestine’,” Slovenian broadcaster RTV said.


Ireland are joint-record seven-time Eurovision winners, but on Saturday, RTE will be showing a Eurovision-themed episode of the popular 1990s Irish-based sitcom “Father Ted” instead.

Spain’s RTVE will run its own musical special, “The House of Music”.

Public service broadcasters in the Netherlands and Iceland will screen the competition, despite neither taking part.


‘We hope they come back’

Only 35 countries will take part in Eurovision this year — the fewest since entry was expanded in 2004 — following the five withdrawals.

As to whether those countries could return, Eurovision chief Green said: “We’ve got five members of our family missing this year. We miss them and we love them and we hope they come back.

“We’ll remain in conversations. We’re very clear we’ll do anything in our power to find a pathway back. Ultimately, it’s up to them and I totally respect that,” he told a press conference at the Wiener Stadthalle venue.

He also fielded questions about the voting system’s vulnerability to manipulation.

On Saturday, Green said Israel’s participating broadcaster KAN was warned to stop putting out videos urging viewers “to vote 10 times for Israel”, saying such actions were not in line with the rules and spirit of the competition.

Noting that this year, professional juries were returning to the semi-finals as a counterbalance to the public vote, “we have one of the most safest, secure and fair voting systems,” he said Monday.


Amnesty decries ‘cowardice’


First held in 1956, Eurovision is run by the European Broadcasting Union, the world’s biggest alliance of public-service media.

Amnesty International said the EBU’s failure to suspend Israel from Eurovision was “an act of cowardice”.

Israel’s participation “offers the country a platform to try to deflect attention from and normalise its ongoing genocide in the occupied Gaza Strip”, Amnesty’s secretary general Agnes Callamard said in a statement.

“Songs and sequins must not be allowed to drown out or distract from Israel’s atrocities or Palestinian suffering.”

A UN-backed probe in September determined that “genocide is occurring in Gaza” — a charge that Israel vehemently denies.

Amichai Chikli, Israel’s diaspora affairs minister, said a “sharp and coordinated surge in antisemitic and anti-Israel discourse surrounding Eurovision 2026” had been detected.

“This online incitement attempts, among other things, to brand the Eurovision as ‘Genovision’ — an event allegedly concealing a fabricated Israeli ‘genocide’,” he said in a statement.

“This situation is a direct continuation and result of the conduct of European governments and public bodies, which choose, in a hypocritical and weak manner, to boycott the competition.” — AFP


***


Shailoks cheat every which way




The Letter DAP Cannot Ignore-Even If It Wants To



Malaysia's #1 Content Aggregator



OPINION | The Letter DAP Cannot Ignore-Even If It Wants To


12 May 2026 • 6:00 PM MYT



Picture from Google Gemini's Image Generation (Nano Banana)

By Mihar Dias May 2026


There was a time when open letters in Malaysian politics were written in the polite language of constitutionalism, economic policy, or coalition arithmetic. This one is different. It is not merely political. It is civilisational.



The lengthy open letter by Ustaz Noor Deros addressed to DAP is not just another conservative Malay-Muslim critique of the party. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EDmemf5u1/ It is something deeper and potentially more consequential: an articulation of a growing worldview among segments of the Malay-Muslim intelligentsia that sees the political contest in Malaysia not as one between parties, but between entire moral universes.


That distinction matters.


For decades, DAP believed the central Malaysian argument was about governance, corruption, equality, economic competence, constitutional rights, and administrative fairness. The letter argues otherwise. It insists the real axis of politics is metaphysical: Islam versus secularism; rooted civilisation versus imported liberalism; historical continuity versus ideological disruption. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EDmemf5u1/ 
In one sense, the letter is remarkably sophisticated. It does not merely accuse DAP of being “anti-Malay” in the crude style of old ceramah politics. Instead, it reframes the Malay rejection of DAP as a conscious civilisational defence mechanism. The argument is simple: Malays are not resisting change itself — after all, they embraced Islam centuries ago and transformed their worldview entirely — they are resisting a political project perceived to dilute Islam’s centrality in national identity. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EDmemf5u1/



That is a far more difficult accusation for DAP to answer.


Because corruption can be debated. Budgets can be recalculated. Policies can be amended. But when politics becomes a question of sacred identity, compromise becomes almost theological treason.


The most striking line in the letter may not even be the repeated attacks on secularism. It is the blunt invitation for DAP members to “masuk Islam” — convert to Islam — as the path toward genuine Malay acceptance. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EDmemf5u1/



On the surface, it reads provocative, even incendiary. Yet politically, it reveals something important: the writer is essentially declaring that assimilation, not coexistence, is the ultimate condition for trust.


That is a profound shift in tone.


Malaysia’s post-1969 political structure was built on negotiated coexistence. The old bargain never demanded ideological surrender from minorities. Chinese parties remained Chinese parties; Malay parties remained Malay parties; everyone operated within a carefully managed ethnic equilibrium. This letter suggests that equilibrium is no longer sufficient for parts of the Malay-Muslim discourse. Acceptance now increasingly requires civilisational alignment.



And therein lies the real danger for the unity government led by Anwar Ibrahim.


Because PKR and DAP have long attempted to bridge two incompatible vocabularies simultaneously: liberal multiracial constitutionalism on one side, and Islamic-majoritarian legitimacy on the other. For years, Anwar Ibrahim managed this balancing act through charisma, ambiguity, and rhetorical elasticity. But letters like this indicate the centre ground is shrinking.


The old formula — “DAP is not anti-Islam, merely secular” — may no longer reassure enough Malay voters because the letter explicitly frames secularism itself as the threat.



That is politically devastating because it shifts the debate onto terrain where DAP is structurally weak.


DAP can defend itself against allegations of corruption. It can point to governance records in Penang and elsewhere. It can cite economic competence, transparency rankings, investments, and administrative efficiency. But how does a secular-democratic party defend secularism itself in a climate where secularism is being portrayed not as neutral governance, but as a spiritually empty colonial inheritance hostile to Islam?



That is the strategic trap embedded in this letter.


The timing matters too.


Across the Muslim world — and especially after Israel–Hamas war and Gaza — political Islam has regained emotional momentum. The letter cleverly taps into global grievances: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Western hypocrisy, liberal decay, and moral collapse. It links local Malaysian politics to a worldwide narrative of Muslim victimhood and Islamic resurgence. This is no longer merely domestic electoral messaging. It is part of a broader transnational mood.



And moods are harder to defeat than manifestos.


Ironically, the letter may also expose DAP’s deepest strategic contradiction. For years, DAP tried to moderate itself to gain Malay confidence. It softened rhetoric, embraced Malay leaders, worked within coalition structures, accepted the monarchy, toned down “Malaysian Malaysia,” and even allowed allies to speak for Islamic sensitivities. Yet this letter suggests none of that matters because the suspicion is not tactical — it is existential.


To critics shaped by this worldview, DAP is not distrusted because of what it does. It is distrusted because of what it represents.



That changes everything.


It means no amount of policy moderation may ever be enough. The issue ceases to be governance and becomes metaphysical authenticity.


The ramifications could be enormous.


First, it further narrows the already limited space for moderate multicultural politics in Malaysia. Any party attempting cross-ethnic consensus will increasingly face pressure to prove Islamic legitimacy, not merely constitutional loyalty.


Second, it strengthens parties and movements that thrive on civilisational polarisation. The more politics is framed as Islam versus secularism, the more the middle ground collapses.



Third, it places non-Muslim parties inside the government in an almost impossible position. If they respond aggressively, they risk reinforcing the narrative that they are hostile to Islam. If they remain silent, they appear intellectually defeated.


Finally, the letter reflects a generational evolution within Malay political thought itself. Older Malay nationalism was often ethnic and material — quotas, land, contracts, language, political dominance. This newer rhetoric is theological and civilisational. It is less interested in economics than in metaphysical purpose.



That makes it far more enduring.


But there is also another uncomfortable truth buried inside this entire episode.


The more Malaysian politics moves into sacred territory, the less room remains for pragmatic compromise — and Malaysia has historically survived precisely because of compromise. The country’s stability was built not on ideological purity, but on ambiguity, accommodation, and mutual toleration between communities that never entirely trusted one another but understood the cost of permanent confrontation.


This letter signals impatience with that ambiguity.


And that may be the most consequential development of all.


***


I respectfully disagree with Mihar Dias. While it's expected that PAS and cohorts are (always have been) against secularism, that long established fact doesn't deny DAP of a reason to show it is NOT against Islam, even if PAS insists that secularism itself is anti-Islam.

Secularism is a choice for DAP and the concept (secularism) does NOT automatically declares that every DAP member is an atheist, a common enough folly. DAP members can be both secularistic and a Christian, Buddhist, Taoist, Hindu, Confucianist, Ba'hai or even Muslim because 'secularism' is not a religious belief per se but a general belief in the principle of separating religion from state institutions, public education, and law, focusing instead on naturalistic considerations, human rights, and social cohesion. It ensures state neutrality, protecting freedom of belief for all individuals, whether religious or non-religious, without allowing any particular worldview to dominate public policy.

Therein (above underlined highlighted sentences) allow even Muslims to be 'secularists' without being apostates or heretics. For example, Türkiye is constitutionally a secular nation since 1937, as is Malaysia since its formation though many Malaysian Muslims reject that despite several court rulings.

But whatever, DAP needn't shy away from its long time status of being 'secular' insofar as state policies are concerned.


Why Mahathir destroys everything he tries to save



Malaysia's #1 Content Aggregator



OPINION | Why Mahathir destroys everything he tries to save


12 May 2026 • 3:00 PM MYT



Image credit: Utusan Borneo


In the way that I see it, Mahathir was not born a Malay. He likely became a Malay much later in life.


One reason that I believe that Mahathir is not a Malay by birth Is because Mahathir is the only "Constitutional Malay" in the entire world.


I have never heard any other Malay claim that they are a Malay because the constitution says so.



If you are born a Malay, you will just say you are a Malay because you are a Malay. You won't provide any further explanation, because your race will be a self evident truth, that stands on its own.


That Mahathir has repeatedly explained that he is a Malay because he satisfies article 160 of the constitution's definition of a Malay, is to me the proof that he wasn't born a Malay.



The fact that he repeatedly laments publicly that the Malays are untrustworthy or lazy or ungrateful, is another reason why I don't think he was born a Malay.


If you are born a Malay, you will not so consistently condemn your own race, because it will feel like you are condemning yourself.


Yes, there are Malays that criticize their race harshly and regularly, just as there are Indians and Chinese that criticise the Chinese and Indians race regularly and harshly, but that is mostly because they are frustrated with their lives.



Mahathir on the other hand, has achieved a lot in his life - that despite achieving a lot, he still sees fit to condemn the Malays, is likely another proof that he didn't always identify as a Malay.


If you notice, no other high ranking or succesful Malay condemns the Malay as regularly or harshly as Mahathir does. Be it Tunku or Tun Razak or Hussein Onn or Najib or Anwar or Muhyiddin or Pak Lah, none of them criticise the Malays as regularly or harshly as Mahathir.


Also, to be brutally honest, the way that Mahathir criticizes the Malay is actually the way that the older generation Non-Malays criticise the Malays. That Mahathir looks at the Malay disparagingly as how some older generation Non-Malays look at the Malays is another indication that Mahathir most likely identified as a non-Malay until later in his life.



Another reason that I believe that Mahathir did not identify as a Malay until much later in his life is because of the way he sounds and expresses himself.


I don't think that I am the only one who can notice a non - Malay or Indian twang in his accent. Not only that, the way that Mahathir jokes, uses sarcasm or cynicism in his expressions, is also closer to the indian rather than the Malay way of expressing oneself, and the difference is as noticeable as how an Indian curry is noticeably different from a Malay curry.



Finally, I don't think Mahathir is Malay because according to such journalists like Barry Wain, who researched Mahathir's life, Mahathir was born a non-Malay, or as Wain termed it, a Peranakan.


Now although he wasn't born a Malay, I consider Mahathir as a Malay, because I think it is possible to legitimately convert into becoming a Malay, even if you are not born a Malay.


In my view, the Malay identity is a work based identity, not a birth based identity.


You can't convert into a birth based identity, like the Chinese or Tamil identity - to be a Chinese or a Tamil, you have to be born as a Chinese or Tamil or at least, be raised as Chinese or Tamil from birth.



But you can convert into a work based identity later in life, if you agree to embrace the norms and ways of the people you wish to join, and they reciprocate your gesture by accepting you into their fold.


In my view, the Malay identity is like the Viking or Mongol identity - you can join it later in life, even if you have no ancestors in the group, for so long as you are willing to work together with the people you are joining.


My problem with Mahathir though, is that when he converted into becoming a Malay, instead of making himself more Malay, he wants the Malays to be more like him.



Because he is originally a non-Malay, when he wants the Malays to be more like him, it is equal to him wanting the Malays to be more like the non-Malays.


At the same time that he wants the Malays to be more like the non-Malay that he used to be, he is also expecting the non-Malays to follow his example and become like a Malay, although he himself doesn't want to be like a Malay.


When the Malays would rather be Malays than non-Malays, he takes offense to them not wanting to be more like him, and condemns them as lazy and ungrateful.



At the same time, when the non-Malays would rather be non-Malays than Malays, he also takes offense against the non-Malays for not wanting to be like him, and condemns them as disloyal and chauvinistic.


Mahathir likely genuinely believes that he is a uniting figure, because he wants the Malays to be like the non-Malays and the non-Malays like Malays, and perhaps in his mind, he sees his desire for all of us to be what we are not as an effort into uniting us to be one and the same, but he is actually a very divisive figure precisely for the same reason.



One of the great tragedies of our country is that we put Mahathir at the top for so long that at least two or more generations have modelled ourselves by using him as our example.


The problem with using Mahathir as an example, is that the more we model ourselves after him, the more we will despise ourselves for being what we are not and despise everybody else for not wanting to be what we ourselves cannot be.


Mahathir has many great qualities - he is energetic, intelligent and daring, but his conflicted sense of self has been the one great tragedy of his life and the lives of everybody else he influenced.



If he was not such a conflicted person, maybe his could have been as great as Lee Kuan Yew.


But because of this one great flaw of his, he has never been able to make peace with himself, ruined his legacy and caused the people that he led for decades, to be plagued with an identity crisis for generations.


Anyway, this thought occurred to me when I read that Mahathir is again lamenting that he has failed to unite the Malays, in a Facebook post a day or two ago, before lamenting how this is going to cause them to lose their country - which I don't doubt is a passive aggressive dig against the non-Malays.



The great tragedy that is Mahathir is that he genuinely sees himself as a uniting figure, even if his efforts only causes division, not only in his country, race and party ,but also within himself.


The more he tries to unite anything, the more he divides it, and the more than everything he tries to unite becomes divided, the more he will weep for it.


In a way he reminds me of the Russian Tsar Ivan the Terrible, who would massacre multitudes in the day, and then spend the night praying for the salvation of their souls.



If there is anything we can learn from Mahathir, it is that sometimes we can be our own worst enemy, and when we are our own worst enemy, no matter how brilliant we are, nothing we do will bear fruit , and the more we try to save anything - be it our race, country, party or even our own sense of self - the more we will destroy it.


Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Two wild cards for the next election


Murray Hunter
May 11, 2026



Two wild cards for the next election






As I am trying to find out why I am banned form leaving Thailand and undo this so I have freedom to travel once again.

There are two things I wish to bring your attention to as they are both going to greatly influence the way the next election will go.


A pardon for Najib Razak

Najib was originally sentenced to 12 years in 2020. In early 2024, the Pardons Board (under the previous King) granted a partial pardon, halving it to 6 years and reducing the fine. He has been serving this in Kajang Prison since August 2022. Back in November Najib was given another 15-year sentence in a major 1MDB-related trial (abuse of power and money laundering).

Groups within UMNO are actively pushing for a full pardon, with many divisions submitting motions for it. UMNO leaders like Deputy PM Zahid Hamidi have publicly expressed hope for one.

The YDPA can grant it. Whether it happens depends on political support, the Pardons Board/King’s view, and timing. Some argue that Federal Territories Minister Hannah Yeow will staunchly oppose any such move by the board. However, she is just one member with no veto power. Any pardon given to Najib would reflect very badly on Hannah Yeow and the DAP across the board.

A pardoned Najib before the general election releases a wild card. Najib is one of the few UMNO people that the Malays will listen to in the rural hustings. He will definitely be portrayed as a freed political prisoner, in some sense playing a similar role Anwar Ibrahim once played.

With a pardon Najib would be eligible to run as a candidate and will generate massive publicity. With the current political scene Najib could easily become a de facto opposition leader and take the fight right up to the prime minister.



Najib would electrify a Barisan Nasional campaign


A group is preparing a massive electoral fraud operation

A couple of sources have informed me that a massive well financed operation is getting ready to intervene into the next Malaysian general election process. Electoral tampering drastically changed the result of the last Thai general election, where evidence of fraud is difficult to establish.

These same forces are involved in strategizing a similar Malaysian project for a certain political party. There are ‘black contractors’ ready to move ballot boxes full of fraudulent votes into the ballot counting process on election night. The key target will be during early voting.

This will create a surprise result that no election surveys will predict.





Electoral fraud is very sophisticated and the recent Thai election indicates that extra safety provisions are required.

These are important issues I wanted to bring your attention to.


***


Who knows, Najib may even be the next PM, wakakaka - and the Grand Old Man will collapse lah!!!

😂😂😂

BN may struggle to win back voters if changes not seen in Umno, says Shahril




BN may struggle to win back voters if changes not seen in Umno, says Shahril


Yesterday
Kirthana Arumugam, Kayley Loo and Danish Raja Reza


Former Umno leader says anger with the current government does not automatically translate into support for Barisan Nasional


Former Umno information chief Shahril Hamdan at the Affin Market Outlook Conference 2026 in Kuala Lumpur today.



KUALA LUMPUR: Barisan Nasional (BN) risks failing to benefit from voter dissatisfaction with the current government if Malaysians do not see changes in Umno, says the party’s former information chief Shahril Hamdan.

He said any BN comeback would depend on the coalition’s ability to convince voters that it had genuinely renewed itself since its defeats in 2018 and 2022.

“You cannot mistake people’s disgruntlement with the current administration for the idea that, if push comes to shove, they are willing to support BN.


“What has actually changed in the party that would make people who didn’t support it in 2018 and 2022 want to support it now?” he said at the Affin Market Outlook Conference 2026.

He was speaking as a panellist during a session titled “Malaysia’s Investment Future: Resilience, Reform & Returns”, where he was asked if he thought the ruling coalition could remain in power after the next general election.


Former deputy trade minister Ong Kian Ming was also a panellist, while Peter Yong, co-founder of Mr Money TV, moderated the session.

Shahril said BN’s problem is not only public perception, but whether Umno’s leadership, internal culture and messaging appear meaningfully different.

“It’s the same faces. It’s the same set of policies. It’s the same dynamic. You have ostensibly progressive faces but also right-wing politicians who remain the core of the party.”

He said this gap could open up the space for anti-establishment figures to attract voters unhappy with Pakatan Harapan (PH) but still unwilling to return to BN.


Naming former PKR deputy president Rafizi Ramli and former Muda president Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman, Shahril said both built political brands around being outside the establishment.

“Their brand is integrity… They did not sell out, did not strike a deal, and are not your normal politicians.”

He said such figures were unlikely to win enough seats to form the government but could split the vote in a way that disadvantages both PH and BN.

He said this could lead to a post-election scenario where Perikatan Nasional (PN) becomes too dominant for BN to realistically claim the prime minister’s post.


“If PN and BN do not each win about 60 seats, and the result is closer to PN winning 90 seats and BN 30, that changes the equation. It would be difficult to justify a BN prime minister if BN is clearly the smaller partner.”

The 16th general election (GE16) is due by February 2028, though speculation persists that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim may call an early election, possibly in the second half of 2026, to align with the Melaka and Johor state polls.

Despite previously pushing for the unity alliance to continue into GE16, BN has since signalled its intention to contest the next general election independently.

However, BN chairman Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has said the coalition may still pursue electoral pacts with “other parties” to avoid overlapping seat contests.

Freeze Penang land tax, water tariff hikes for 1 year, says Guan Eng





Freeze Penang land tax, water tariff hikes for 1 year, says Guan Eng


Yesterday
Predeep Nambiar


The Air Putih assemblyman says the state and PBAPP can absorb the RM70 million in foregone revenue to ease the people’s burden


Air Putih assemblyman Lim Guan Eng said the impact on ordinary people and businesses would be far greater than the additional revenue gained by the state and Penang Water Supply Corporation. (Facebook pic)



GEORGE TOWN: Lim Guan Eng has urged the Penang government to defer its land tax increase and a scheduled water tariff hike for at least a year, saying the state should not add to the people’s financial burden amid uncertain economic conditions.

The former Penang chief minister said the freeze would cost the state government and the Penang Water Supply Corporation (PBAPP) about RM70 million in foregone revenue, which he said both entities could absorb.

Lim (PH-Air Putih) said the state was expected to collect an additional RM50 million from the land tax revision, while PBAPP would gain about RM20 million from an average 20 sen per cubic metre increase in water tariffs from July 1.


“The RM50 million and RM20 million can be borne by the state government and PBAPP, respectively,” he said when debating the governor’s address in the Penang state assembly.

He added that the impact on ordinary people and businesses would be far greater than the additional revenue gained by the state and PBAPP.

Lim said the proposed freeze should last for one year, or until the global economic crisis eased.

He said the conflict in the Middle East had pushed up oil prices, disrupted supply chains, and increased the cost of raw materials and logistics.

Lim said if the state government or PBAPP urgently needed the funds, they could seek financing from the federal government instead of passing the cost on to the public.

In May last year, Penang chief minister Chow Kon Yeow said the state was facing a cash flow problem and a possible deficit of up to RM500 million, prompting it to seek a RM100 million advance from Putrajaya as a buffer.


Table Perak water deal in assembly first

Lim also said any agreement on the purchase of treated water from Perak should be tabled in the state assembly before it is signed.

He said the proposed deal, involving up to 500 million litres of treated water, could eventually push PBAPP’s tariffs to RM3 per cubic metre or more – almost five times the current average tariff of 62 sen.

He said that while 20,000 litres would cost about RM12.40 at 62 sen per cubic metre, the same volume would cost RM60, before other charges were added, if the tariff was raised to RM3 per cubic metre.

Lim said the higher tariff would take effect once treated water supply began in about 10 years, with the project expected to start in 2031.

He said the agreement should not be decided solely by PBAPP or PBA Holdings Bhd board members as it involved public water supply and affected all 1.8 million people in Penang.

He said the public must also be assured that the agreement would represent the best possible deal for Penang.


***


Guanee, don't be a publicity hound - do this within the party


UN: Children paying ‘intolerable price’ in West Bank as 70 killed by Israeli forces since 2025






UN: Children paying ‘intolerable price’ in West Bank as 70 killed by Israeli forces since 2025



Israeli soldiers direct Palestinian children to disperse during a weekly settlers’ tour in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, May 9, 2026. — Reuters pic

Tuesday, 12 May 2026 6:23 PM MYT


GENEVA, May 12 — The United Nations condemned today the toll from “escalating” Israeli military operations and settler attacks in the occupied West Bank on children, with 70 Palestinian children killed since the start of 2025.

“Children are paying an intolerable price for escalating military operations and settler attacks across the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem,” UN children’s agency spokesman James Elder told reporters.

Since the start of 2025, when Israel began a large-scale military operation in the West Bank, “at least one Palestinian child has been killed on average every single week” there, adding that another 850 children had been injured during that period.

“Most of those killed or wounded were done by live ammunition,” he said.

Israeli forces were responsible for a full 93 per cent of the deaths, Elder said, highlighting that the scaled-up military operations had come amid “historic levels of settler attacks”.


According to the UN, March 2026 saw the highest number of Palestinians injured by Israeli settlers in at least 20 years, he pointed out.

“Documented incidents include children shot, stabbed, children beaten and children pepper-sprayed,” Elder pointed out.


He stressed that such incidents were taking place against the backdrop of the “steady dismantling of the conditions children need to survive and grow”.

“Homes are demolished, education is destroyed, water systems are attacked, access to healthcare is obstructed, movement is restricted,” he said.

Mass displacement

At the same time, there has been a dramatic spike in the number of barriers and restrictions imposed across the West Bank, meaning children in the Palestinian territory “are routinely cut off from schools, from hospitals and other essential services”.

All of this has caused mass displacement, with more than 2,500 Palestinians — 1,100 of them children — displaced in just the first four months of this year in the West Bank.

“That surpasses the total displacement recorded in 2025,” Elder pointed out.

Since the war in Gaza erupted in October 2023, after Hamas’s attack in Israel, violence has also surged in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967 in contravention of international law.

Israeli soldiers or settlers have killed at least 1,070 Palestinians, including many militants, according to an AFP tally based on Palestinian Authority figures.

Official Israeli figures meanwhile show that at least 46 Israelis, including soldiers and civilians, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations in the same period. — AFP


***


The shailoks must be held totally accountable for their immense evil, offering child sacrifices to their god Moloch






‘Taken out of context’: Liew Chin Tong denies announcing new 150L Budi95 limit





‘Taken out of context’: Liew Chin Tong denies announcing new 150L Budi95 limit



Deputy Finance Minister Liew Chin Tong delivers his speech at the Affin Market Outlook 2026 at Menara AFFIN @ TRX in Kuala Lumpur on May 12, 2026. — Bernama pic

Tuesday, 12 May 2026 6:07 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, May 12 — Deputy Finance Minister Liew Chin Tong has clarified that he did not announce a reduced 150-litre Budi95 quota, saying that his remarks during a corporate event earlier today were taken out of context.

The clarification follows media reports suggesting that the government was mulling specific fuel caps as part of its subsidy rationalisation strategy.

Liew said that in no instance during a fireside chat during an Affin Bank event did he announce any policy on behalf of the government, nor did he present a 150-litre limit as a potential move.

Addressing the "media storm" caused by the reports, Liew explained that his comments were focused on data and long-term sustainability.

“I said the Budi95 mechanism is a good tool as it provides us with data to understand the travel pattern of Malaysians.

“⁠The top priority of the government and everyone in the society is to ensure that we have sufficient supply for as long as possible,” Liew said in a subsequent statement.

He argued that as a nation, Malaysia must ensure its petrol supply lasts for as long as possible. To achieve this, he suggested that the country should eventually build a societal consensus to support efforts aimed at reducing overall fuel consumption.

Expressing regret over the misunderstanding, the deputy finance minister urged the public and the media to consider the full context of his statements.

He reiterated that the discussion was centred on managing the global energy crisis and long-term resource management rather than the immediate implementation of new restrictive policies.

CHINA BRAINWASHING WAS CIA FICTION


From the FB page of:


CHINA BRAINWASHING WAS CIA FICTION: CIA
It was not China or North Korea, but the US which worked on mind control processes in the 1950s to 1970s, newly declassified CIA documents show.
The US had long claimed that it used illegal brainwashing techniques on people (US and Canadian citizens, Korean prisoners of war) because they were copying what China and North Korea were doing.
The US even produced a string of movies, and a bestselling book, “The Manchurian Candidate”, telling stories of Americans brainwashed with drugs and mind-control methods by the Chinese and the Koreans.
But these tales, some starring Ronald Reagan, were designed to fool Americans and the wider public.
.
CIA, NOT CHINA
The new documents, declassified this month, show no evidence of Chinese or North Koreans taking any such action, and indicate that the illegal techniques used in these programs (Project Bluebird, Project Artichoke, and MK-Ultra) originated from the CIA, not the Chinese or Koreans.
CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb already said in 1983 that the Chinese and the Koreans “DIDN'T depend upon sophisticated techniques used in drugs and other more technical means” (contrary to popular allegations in the media).
This system, now known as Projection, is widely used today. The US creates friction in Taiwan, or Hong Kong, or the South China Seas, or in waters around Korea, and then blames China and North Korea.
Today, as in the 1950s, the US intelligence agencies work closely with the western mainstream media to make sure that tension created by the west is blamed on the victims.
But many people today are harder to fool. Be one of the smart ones! Peace.