Tuesday, December 02, 2025

Give MCA a 2nd chance in place of DAP


Reference to a paragraph in the article Told You So – Congrats Anwar & Anthony For Leading PKR-DAP To Extinction, namely, "DAP has long been compared to eunuch MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association). But DAP is worse than MCA. At least, MCA was subservient to only UMNO. DAP is submissive to both UMNO and PKR", I believe it's time to relieve MCA from political opprobrium.

MCA has suffered long enough and is probably reborn by now, having learn its lesson (and villain status) for aeons. Instead let DAP enjoy its newly earned label of a "cringe-worthy" political party, a lapdog of its Malay partner, a 'yes-man' to ketuanan Melayu.

It is of course true that today's DAP is lightyears worse than yesterday's MCA, but as stated let us no longer mentioned MCA in despicable terms, comparative as it has been. Give the party (MCA) a 2nd chance and in place let us now enjoy insulting DAP, wakakaka (well, until it repents).




Told You So – Congrats Anwar & Anthony For Leading PKR-DAP To Extinction





Told You So – Congrats Anwar & Anthony For Leading PKR-DAP To Extinction


December 1st, 2025 by financetwitter



He had been huffing and puffing profusely trying to convince Sabahans to vote for Pakatan Harapan, an alliance made up of PKR (People’s Justice Party), DAP (Democratic Action Party) and Amanah (National Trust Party). But the voters in the Borneo state saw only injustice, inaction and untrustworthiness from the Malaya-based ruling government led by forked-tongue Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.


The Sabah state election results on Saturday (November 29) show that not only angry and disillusioned Chinese Sabahan had rejected Chinese-dominated party DAP, but there was also not a single “Palestinian vote” for PKR, let alone Amanah. It was a huge humiliation for Anwar, whose tireless – yet boring – campaign captured only 1 seat for his party PKR, whilst DAP was literally wiped out with zero seats.



In total, Pakatan Harapan won only 1 seat despite fielding 22 candidates. That is a “national embarrassment” considering that its chairman Anwar is the 10th Prime Minister, who also holds the purse strings in his capacity as the finance minister. Even then, its sole victory came from an assemblyman who had been parachuted in from Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) at the eleventh hour.




PKR’s win in Melalap through Jamawi Jaafar was nothing to shout about. He was one of three express frogs “bought” by Anwar in the last minute to boost PKR’s chances. Jamawi was once with UMNO, before hopped to Parti Warisan. However, when Warisan fell in 2020, Warisan returned to UMNO and when UMNO was not on the same page with GRS in 2023, Jamawi jumped ship to GRS and is now in PKR.



Another parachute candidate orchestrated by Anwar and his daughter Nurul Izzah was Yamani Hafez Musa, the son of Musa Aman, the Sabah governor and a former corrupt chief minister. Despite high expectations, Yamani ended up losing the contest in Sindumin to Warisan’s Yusri Pungut. PKR’s gamble on another parachute candidate from GRS, George Hiew, also lost to Warisan’s Alex Wong.





Therefore, PKR has actually been wiped out in Sabah, losing even its traditional two seats of Api-Api and Inanam, which it won in the 2013 General Election and retained in the last state polls. Still, the top leadership of PKR continued to show arrogance. Lawmaker Fuziah proudly told all and sundry that PKR was on its way to form a state government, even before GRS chairman Hajiji Noor finished compiling his numbers.


The stunning defeat reflects how PKR had lost touch with the realities on the ground. In fact, barely 24 hours before the polling, the clueless PKR Sabah bragged about winning up to eight seats out of the 22 constituencies it was contesting. It was already bad when PKR was given the chance to contest 12 seats, up from eight in the 2020 polls, but managed to win only 1 seat (thanks to a lucky frog).



It becomes worse when in spite of the “middle finger” shown by the Sabahans, half-baked PKR deputy president and election director Nurul Izzah pretends that the party was still in great demand. The daughter of PM Anwar said that PKR’s opportunity to contest 12 seats shows the “seeds of confidence” in the party are beginning to take root in Sabah. Sure, what could possibly go wrong with such mentality.



It’s not that the People’s Justice Party did not know the incoming tsunami. There were prior surveys done by think-tank like Ilham Centre – warning of a wind of change among Chinese voters in seats such as Likas, Inanam, Luyang, Kapayan and Api-Api, all of which were previously held by Pakatan Harapan. But Anwar and his lieutenants stubbornly believed PKR was powerful, invincible and undefeatable.


DAP under the arrogant leadership of Anthony Loke Siew Fook, meanwhile, was both shocked and speechless after failing to retain any of the eight seats it had won in the last state polls – the worst result in DAP’s history. The party top leadership did not expect the annihilation of big guns like DAP chief Phoong Jin Zhe, his deputy Chan Foong Hin, Sandakan MP Vivian Wong and two-term Kapayan assemblyman Jannie Lasimbang.



Having dominated in urban areas for several election cycles, DAP was overconfident even before it entered the election. Since winning its first Sabah state seat in 2008, DAP has slowly built up entrenched positions in the state, mostly in urban areas with a sizeable Chinese voter base. The party reached its peak in 2018, going from four state seats to six – a number which it retained in 2020.



However, those achievements were not due to Anthony (who took over as the new DAP secretary-general in March 2022), but thanks to years of hard work from previous leadership such as Lim Kit Siang and son Lim Guan Eng. In the same breath, PKR and DAP’s results in the 2020 Sabah state election were also attributed to their partnership with Warisan that year. This round, DAP lost all the constituencies it previously held to Warisan.


Many Chinese voters happily shifted their support to Warisan instead of DAP, largely due to the perceived lack of integrity at the federal level and corruption scandals involving political elites in Sabah, which power-crazy Mr Anwar shamelessly defended in order to cling to power. But corruption did not rock only Sabah, but also the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).



When corruption scandal plagued the PMO, which saw PM Anwar arrogantly defending his senior political secretary Shamsul Iskandar, DAP downplayed the crisis and bragged about its so-called “good service” for the people, despite lacking basic amenities like electricity, water, roads and public transport. If Sabahans wanted good service, they would rather go to Hatyai for head-to-toe service.



Worse, after UPKO president Ewon Benedick resigned as Entrepreneur Development and Cooperatives Minister over disagreement with Anwar-appointed Attorney General’s appeal on Sabah’s 40% revenue rights, followed by the withdrawal of UPKO from Pakatan Harapan, DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke foolishly attacked Ewon in an attempt to impress his boss Anwar.


Loke’s moronic attack was the last straw that broke the camel’s back. DAP, through its relative silence – made worse by Loke’s attack on Ewon – on the issue of Sabah’s 40% entitlement to its federal revenue contributions, continued to behave as though its Chinese vote bloc was assured – a fixed deposit – even as ground sentiment showed they were shifting to Warisan.



Sabah has for years been trying to negotiate a return of its entitlement as stated in the Federal Constitution. The last thing they want is an appeal from Malaya to insult a Sabah High Court’s verdict that Sabah is entitled to 40% of revenue collected in the state. Anwar’s Madani decision to appeal was seen as betrayal, disrespect, and oppression, whilst Loke’s attack was seen as insensitive, ignorance and arrogance.


UPKO’s strategic move to leave Anwar-led Pakatan Harapan paid off when the party tripled its seats to three in the Sabah election on Saturday. The negative reaction to the arrest of Albert Tei, the businessman at the heart of an alleged mining corruption scandal implicating GRS-PH, by enforcement agencies under Anwar’s government, has also painted Pakatan Harapan as a bully and gangster like Barisan Nasional.


Sabahan might not be very clever, but they were smart enough to not trust PKR president, who trumpeted about anti-corruption and good governance, but at the same time defended the corrupt Sabah elites. Likewise, they have enough brain cells to see Sabah DAP as nothing but lapdogs taking orders from their big boss in Malaya. Neither big talker PKR nor DAP was interested in championing the rights of Sabah.



Sabah Chinese chose to vote for Warisan in droves because Shafie Apdal has the balls to speak up against racial discrimination, corruption and injustice – the previous trademark role played by DAP. Hardcore supporters of DAP who now laugh and mock Sabahans as “sohai” for supporting the corrupt Hajiji government again should realize that Anwar and Loke were also the same “sohais” who defended Hajiji, and worse, continues the support the corrupt gang today.


At the same time, the ethnic Chinese in Sabah could see how “ungrateful” young Turks led by Loke had plotted with gang members like Nga Kor Ming, Steven Sim Chee Keong, and Chow Kon Yeow to kick out “old guard” led by Lim Guan Eng. But unlike Lim, who fought to defend the interests of the minority Chinese community, the Loke faction cowardly keeps quiet whenever the ethnic Chinese are bullied.


If spineless DAP under Loke leadership does not even have the balls to defend Chinese in Malaya, how do you expect Sabah Chinese can trust DAP to speak for them in Borneo? DAP has long been compared to eunuch MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association). But DAP is worse than MCA. At least, MCA was subservient to only UMNO. DAP is submissive to both UMNO and PKR.



DAP today has no courage, no leadership, no integrity, and no principle. Yet, its leaders were very LCLY (only Chinese understood this acronym). From the suspicious death of Teoh Beng Hock to the abduction of Raymond Koh by the Royal Malaysia Police, and from Lynas radioactive waste to corruption in the Prime Minister Office, DAP’s new motto is “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil”.


For ethnic Chinese to be trampled all over by UMNO gangster Akmal Saleh is one thing. For Prime Minister Anwar to personally threaten to ban alcohol in Chinese schools’ halls rented to generate income for maintenance, upgrades, and student aid is another thing altogether. It was only after DAP adviser Lim Guan Eng fiercely spoke up that the timid Anthony Loke, whose mantra was “don’t spook the Malays”, found his balls to beg Anwar for a U-turn.


And it definitely screams betrayal when DAP, which was once perceived as a fearless and outspoken party against corruption, racism, extremism and injustice during the era of Lim Kit Siang and Karpal Singh, is now reduced to a church mouse – too terrified to even express its displeasure over crooked Najib Razak’s discounted jail sentence and dropping of corruption charges against UMNO crooks as well as Anwar’s cronies.



Instead of fighting against crooks who had stolen billions, DAP excitedly rubbed shoulders with them, even having wet dreams of partnering with UMNO in the next 16th General Election. The fact that Barisan Nasional suffered major setbacks in the Sabah state election – from 59 seats in 2008 to just 14 in 2020, and to 6 now – indicates that UMNO which DAP tries to suck up to is on its way to oblivion.



In general, Sabahans were disappointed because instead of lowering the cost of living, eradicating poverty, and fighting corruption, the Anwar government has instead expanded sales and service tax (SST), introduced more taxes, and protected crooks. To their horror, the premier easily gave away RM200 million to Hamas-Palestinian while the people of Sabah struggle to put food on the table. It’s “Sabah First” bah, not “Gaza First”.


Anwar supporters in Malaya may think he is the greatest invention since sliced bread, but many Sabahans still remember and view Anwar with distrust because when he served as former PM Mahathir Mohamad’s deputy in government from 1993 to 1998, Anwar was involved in covert operations to alter the demographics of the state by issuing citizenships to illegal Muslim refugees from the neighbouring islands of southern Philippines and Indonesia.



Crucially, Anwar’s political rhetoric, hypocrisy, and double-standards have helped to push the narrative that a Sabah government fully composed of local parties could better push Putrajaya for the state’s full and rightful claims under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). MA63, the legal instrument signed in 1963 as the basis of the formation of the Federation of Malaysia, recognises Sabah and Sarawak not as mere states but as equal partners with West Malaysia.


We began criticizing Anwar in the past two years because he had gone astray after just one year in power, and we wanted to push Pakatan Harapan back on the right track. While we were supporters of Pakatan Harapan, a blind supporter we are not. What’s the point of blindly praising Anwar Ibrahim, and Anthony Loke for that matter, if the consequences are a “total wipe out” as seen in the Sabah state election today?


Plenty pro-Anwar bloggers, propagandists, cyber troopers, YouTubers, TikTokers and news media were both shocked and flabbergasted when news flashed about the total annihilation of DAP and the near extinction of PKR in Sabah on Saturday because they had blindly supported and worshipped them, even when the writing was on the wall that Anwar has been deviating from PKR’s original struggle. Sure, go ahead and cook up more excuses that Sabah political landscape is different from Malaya.



The biggest red flag that Anwar has started behaving like ex-PM Najib Razak is his increasing dictatorship due to fear of losing power by limiting freedom of speech to only those praising and supporting the Madani government. Was it a coincidence that Pakatan Harapan lost horribly in Sabah after blocking alternative news sources like FinanceTwitter?


Former Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi’s ruling Barisan Nasional coalition lost for the first time its traditional two-thirds majority in the 2008 general election – after his son-in-law Khairy Jamaluddin attacked the blogging community, referring to bloggers as “monkeys”. Ultimately, Barisan Nasional lost its power after 60 years under Najib leadership – also after censoring alternative news media, including FinanceTwitter.


Like it or not, the Sabah election result is a “major setback” for not only Anwar, but also his daughter Nurul’s appointment as election director. Nurul Izzah, who was recently appointed deputy president of PKR through a coup hatched by his daddy to topple Rafizi Ramli in an effort to create a dynasty, has damaged her own political credibility, competency and strategic calculations. This is not a wake-up call. This is a warning. She’s not ready.



Perhaps PKR would not have suffered such a humiliating defeat had Rafizi – armed with his big data analysis – remained PKR deputy president and chief strategist. Perhaps DAP would not see an egg on Loke’s face had the young Turks humbly shared power with the old guards, or at least put on a thinking cap before insulting UPKO. DAP needs to go back to DAP 1.0, not MCA 2.0. For now, Guan Eng and Rafizi probably are watching with popcorn


***



Ref to a paragraph above, namely "DAP has long been compared to eunuch MCA (Malaysian Chinese Association). But DAP is worse than MCA. At least, MCA was subservient to only UMNO. DAP is submissive to both UMNO and PKR", I believe it's time to relieve MCA from political opprobrium. MCA has suffered long enough and is probably reborn by now, having learn its lesson (and villain status) for aeons. Let DAP enjoy the label of a "cringe-worthy" political party by itself, a lapdog of its Malay partner, a 'yes-man' to ketuanan Melayu.

It is of course true that today's DAP is lightyears worse than yesterday's MCA, but as stated let us no longer mentioned MCA in despicable terms, comparative as it has been. Give the party (MCA) a 2nd chance and in place let us now enjoy insulting DAP, wakakaka (well, until it repents).


“Tun M ever ready to offer free advice on how to dislodge PMX Anwar from Putrajaya”





“Tun M ever ready to offer free advice on how to dislodge PMX Anwar from Putrajaya”


By Phlip Rodrigues
10 hours ago






WHO do you consult every time you want to derail the Madani government? Invariably, it is Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

The centenarian is always ever ready to offer free advice to anyone who is plotting to unseat Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who gets no respite from the intense criticism of his political foes.

More often than not, Dr Mahathir has one standard counsel and that’s for the PMX to step down for allegedly mismanaging the country.

The twice former premier simply cannot stand the sight of his protégé-turned-adversary who has been making waves on the domestic and international fronts with his policies and decisions – all not aligned with Dr Mahathir’s trajectory of thinking or to his liking.

Although frail in body, the elderly good doctor will jump on the political bandwagon to throw his unstinting support whenever it’s all about opposing the PMX.

In July, the warrior joined a massive “Turun Anwar” rally to press for the resignation of the PMX over the latter’s alleged failure to “deliver promised reforms”, among other grievances.

No doubt, if there is another street demonstration against Anwar over the controversial trade pact with the US, you bet there will be the centenarian marching together with the crowd to castigate the PMX for allegedly selling out the nation’s sovereignty or handing over Malaysia to America.

At any media conferences staged by PAS to complain about the man in Putrajaya, there will be Mahathir joining hands with his former enemy to launch vitriolic attacks on the same target.

If there is another grand alliance of the opposition forged to save Malaysia, you can bet to the last ringgit that the codger will be at the forefront leading the charge against Pakatan Harapan (PH).

Image credit: Hisham Badrul Hashim Spice/Facebook


It looks like he’s playing the role of an inveterate political agitator out to create more troubles for the Madani government. He simply cannot accept defeat – inside or outside politics – and stay quiet in his ripe, old age.

One can say he has descended to playing gutter politics to smear the reputation of his nemesis which is unbecoming of a leader who once commanded respect and admiration for his leadership quality.

So far, his attempts to bring down the administration have been futile. But he won’t give up his seemingly endless quest to find just that one issue that will nail the PMX.

What Dr Mahathir is eagerly searching for is a “smoking gun” – just one piece of incriminating evidence to destroy once and for all the political career of the Tambun MP who also doubles up as the Finance Minister.

Has he found one? It appears that the doctor has something solid this time to make a strong case against the PMX when a businessman Datuk Albert Tei Jiann Cheing met him and perhaps consulted with him over something to do with a mining licensing scandal in Sabah.



Over the past few months, the trader has been strenuously trying his level best to bring the Sabah government to account for allegedly being involved in the bribery scandal.

Tei has produced voluminous amount of documents, videos and WhatsApp screenshots of some Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) politicians allegedly embroiled in this scandal.

Editor’s Note: Tei had on Saturday (Nov 29) been remanded for six days to assist the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in investigating a leaked video clip containing his conversation with a woman identified as Sofia Rini Buyong, the alleged proxy of ex-senior political secretary of PMX, Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin.

But the trader appears to be hitting a brick wall despite his overwhelming evidence against the politicians including state ministers.

Delusional behaviour

So, who did he finally seek advice and help? Of course, Dr Mahathir. Aha! Here is some real juicy evidence because this time, PMX has been dragged into the mud.

Immediately, up jumped Dr Mahathir’s ally, PAS which played the same old broken record by urging PMX to resign over this damning evidence.

It doesn’t matter to Dr Mahathir if it is an unknown businessman who appeared out of the blue to seek his help. His doors are always open to those seeking ways and means of faulting the PKR president. Any enemy of PMX is a friend of Dr Mahathir.

So, here is the man – Malaysia’s longest-serving PM of 22 years and 22 months – going all-out in his campaign to unseat the administration out of sheer spite and loathing of PMX if nothing else.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (left) and twice former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad have failed to establish lasting peace with each other


Dr Mahathir seems to be living in a world of disillusion – thinking that the whole country is backing him in his petty wars.

Even some quarters seem to attach great importance to his person as though he can cure all the ills of the country with his time-worn prescriptions effective in years gone by but out-dated by today’s standards.

Undoubtedly, he will actively participate in the 16th General Election (GE16) and he will be on the stump to urge the electorate to stop supporting Anwar.

And if anyone has more dirt to uncover about the PMX during the course of the campaigning period, who do you call for advice? You got it right – Dr Mahathir! – Dec 1. 2025



Phlip Rodrigues is a retired journalist.

Taiwan Bets $40 Billion On ‘Israeli-Style’ Iron Dome Air Defence Shield; Know All About Taiwan’s T-Dome



Monday, December 1, 2025


Taiwan Bets $40 Billion On ‘Israeli-Style’ Iron Dome Air Defence Shield; Know All About Taiwan’s T-Dome


By AFP NEWS
-November 30, 2025


Taiwan has unveiled plans for an additional $40 billion in defence spending over the coming years, the centrepiece of which is an ambitious, Israeli-inspired multi-layered air defence network — “T-Dome”.

Designed to shield the island from swarms of Chinese fighter jets, ballistic and cruise missiles, and unmanned drones, T-Dome aims to create an impenetrable protective dome over Taiwan’s skies.

Beijing continues to insist that Taiwan is an inseparable part of the People’s Republic and has repeatedly vowed to bring the island under its control, by force if necessary.

President Lai Ching-te has made the rapid deployment of T-Dome a top priority, describing it as an essential “safety net” for Taiwan’s 23 million people amid what he calls China’s increasingly aggressive military posture toward the island and the wider Indo-Pacific region.


What is Taiwan’s T-Dome

The T-Dome was announced by Lai on October 10 and has drawn comparisons with Israel’s Iron Dome anti-missile system.

But there are key differences.

While the Iron Dome is designed mainly for short-range weapons, the T-Dome will face a “much wider array of threats”, Taipei-based security analyst J. Michael Cole said.

“This is aimed at PLA aircraft, ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as, increasingly, drones,” said Cole, using the acronym for China’s People’s Liberation Army.

Taiwan already has air defence systems, including the US-built Patriot and the domestically made Sky Bow systems.

And it is awaiting the delivery of National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System fire units from the United States.

The T-Dome will integrate these with radars, sensors, and other advanced technology to provide what Lai describes as “high-level detection and effective interception”.

“If you do not integrate these detection devices, then those air-defence missiles, whether for counter-fire, counter-attack or counter-drone purposes, can’t achieve efficient interception or effective fire coordination and allocation,” Defence Minister Wellington Koo has said.

The T-Dome will have two major components, said Su Tzu-yun, a military expert at Taipei’s Institute for National Defense and Security Research.

It will have a command and control system that “collects radar data, identifies threats, decides which interceptor should fire, and coordinates all units, so they react within seconds,” Su said.

The other part will be the “interceptor layer” — the weapons used to “shoot down incoming threats” at different altitudes.


(FILES) An Air Force Patriot missile system is deployed at a park in Taipei on July 11, 2025 on the fourth day of the Han Kuang military exercise. Taiwan’s government has proposed 40 billion USD in extra defence spending over several years, with the focus on developing a multi-layered air defence system dubbed “T-Dome”. (Photo by I-Hwa Cheng / AFP)


Why Does Taiwan Need It?

Taiwan has learned vital lessons from Ukraine on the importance of having air defence systems that can protect combat forces, critical infrastructure, and civilian buildings.

While Taiwan has been upgrading its military over the past decade and has spent billions of dollars on US arms, it would be outgunned in a conflict with China.

Having the ability to “neutralise” a sudden Chinese missile strike would help deter Beijing from attacking, Su said.

Su said Chinese warships routinely deployed near Taiwan are capable of firing hundreds of missiles at Taiwan’s airports, radar sites, and military bases “within three minutes”.

That does not include the hundreds of land-based missiles China has.

“This is why Taiwan needs an integrated air defence system capable of responding to these emerging challenges,” Su said.


When Will It Be Ready?

That depends on a range of factors, including when the United States can deliver the weapons and technology needed.

Taiwan is already waiting for billions of dollars’ worth of US arms.

The defence ministry has published a list of items it plans to procure with the new budget, including precision artillery, long-range precision-strike missiles, anti-ballistic and anti-armour missiles, and unmanned systems.

The opposition-controlled parliament has not yet approved the budget and it is not clear what Taiwan plans to buy from the United States, but Lai said there would be “significant” US arms acquisitions.

Lai said Wednesday that Taiwan’s military aims to have a “high level” of joint combat readiness by 2027 — which US officials have previously cited as a possible timeline for a Chinese attack on the island — and “highly resilient and comprehensive deterrent defence capabilities by 2033”.

“Completing the entire T-Dome architecture before 2027 is impossible,” said Su.

“System integration and the production of new interceptors — missiles, anti-aircraft guns, and directed-energy weapons — will all take time.”

Readiness does not only depend on deliveries, said Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University.

“It really comes down to how you define effectiveness, how you define readiness, and what’s included in T-Dome,” Thompson said.

“Are they counting war reserve munitions? Do they have enough missiles in storage? Are they distributed?”

And it also requires the military to “learning how to operate” the systems.


By Agence France-Presse
Edited by ET Online Desk


Monday, December 01, 2025

Why Malaysia’s Anwar faces uphill task after Sabah election trouncing to win back voters


SCMP:

Why Malaysia’s Anwar faces uphill task after Sabah election trouncing to win back voters


Sabah voters don’t trust Anwar, and this will complicate his plan for the next general election, analysts say



Iman Muttaqin Yusof
Published: 7:05pm, 1 Dec 2025
Updated: 7:15pm, 1 Dec 2025


Malaysia’s Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim faces a more complex political landscape ahead after his coalition was routed in Sabah’s polls, as analysts warn he would need to craft a compelling narrative to win over voters ahead of the next general election.

Anwar’s Pakatan Harapan coalition won a single seat of the 73 up for grabs in Saturday’s election, from his own Parti Keadilan Rakyat, a stinging rebuke to a government perceived to have failed to fix Sabah’s perennial problems, ranging from irregular water supply to low funding. The Democratic Action Party, a key part of Anwar’s coalition, lost all its eight seats in the election.

Gagasan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) was the big winner with 29 of 73 seats, enough to return Anwar’s ally, Hajiji Noor, as chief minister, albeit with support from other parties to reach a majority in the state assembly.


Warisan, a moderate and multiethnic party popular with younger and urban voters, secured 25 seats.


Anwar congratulated Hajiji on his reappointment, saying the federal government “fully respects the strong and clear message” delivered by voters in Sabah, whose national-level lawmakers are crucial to keep his parliamentary majority intact.

The outcome of the state polls has exposed the lack of trust among voters with Anwar, and that may be dangerous for him with a general election due by early 2028, according to analysts.

“Sabah voters don’t believe Anwar,” political analyst James Chin told This Week in Asia, as they viewed the low level of revenue returned to the state from the national government as a politically explosive issue.


People gather at a market in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. The outcome of the Malaysian state’s election on Saturday shows that Sabahans that they “don’t believe” Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, political analyst James Chin says. Photo: Shutterstock


“If you include oil and gas, Sabah gets back very little. People feel they have been taken for granted for years,” said Chin, who is a professor at the University of Tasmania.

The election came shortly after the Kota Kinabalu High Court ruled that the federal government had unlawfully failed to deliver Sabah’s constitutional right to 40 per cent of federal revenue collected from the state. Anwar’s administration opted not to appeal, a move widely interpreted as an attempt to address a decades-long grievance before polling day.

But Anwar’s decision not to appeal did little to shift voter sentiment, as Sabah voters resoundingly rejected his coalition.

The results have complicated efforts by Anwar’s administration to help Sabah, one of Malaysia’s poorest states, with a poverty rate of 17.7 per cent in 2024.


The prime minister, who formed the national government in 2022 by bringing together former rivals, depends on Sabah MPs to maintain his two-thirds parliamentary majority.

His coalition has survived challenges from a Malay-nationalist opposition bloc and defended controversial financial measures, including subsidy cuts.

As Anwar plans for the general election, he faces an uphill task to convince voters to return him to power, according to analysts.

“People want more than stability. [They] want tangible changes and benefits,” said Syaza Farhana Mohamad Shukri, head of the political science department at the International Islamic University Malaysia.

Several more state elections – including in Melaka, Negeri Sembilan, Kelantan and Terengganu – are scheduled over the next two years.

If results go against the government, the tide may turn inexorably against Anwar and limit his plan for further reforms, especially on subsidies that drain state budgets but are popular in the poorest parts of the country, analysts say.

A corruption scandal has also hit Anwar’s coalition amid an ongoing probe against one of his former aides in the run-up to the state election.

Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, Anwar’s senior political secretary, resigned last week, hours after allegations surfaced that he had received more than 600,000 ringgit (US$145,300) in gifts and bribes from a businessman linked to the alleged Sabah mining scandal.

Shamsul is being held by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to assist investigators. He said he stepped down to “defend myself” against claims that could “harm the image of the government”.


Charles Santiago, a former DAP MP for Klang in Selangor from 2008 to 2022, said the election loss was “a full-blown backlash” from the party’s former supporters.

“Especially among ethnic Chinese voters who once formed the party’s core support. When your most loyal base turns away, it’s not a warning sign any more – it’s a verdict,” he wrote in an opinion piece on Monday. “The same resentment is simmering in the peninsula.”




Iman Muttaqin Yusof

Iman Muttaqin Yusof is a Kuala Lumpur-based journalist covering Malaysia and Southeast Asia, whose work has previously appeared in international news outlets.

Sabah state election - Koon Yew Yin





Koon Yew Yin's Blog




Koon Yew Yin
Publish date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025, 03:47 PM


The result of Sabah State election (PRN17) on 29th Nov. has shaken the entire nation. The people of Sabah have decisively rejected PKR, DAP and Perikatan National (PN).

PKR preached reform, anti-corruption, meritocracy, and multiculturalism for over 30 years.

Yet when the moment came, Rafizi and the so-called reformists were sidelined to make way for Nurul Izzah, classic nepotism. PKR has turned into a “father-and-daughter” party.

Out of 12 seats contested, PKR won only one and even that victory came from an imported candidate from another party.

DAP lost ALL 8 seats contested, every single traditional urban stronghold. In Luyang, Warisan crushed Dap with a 6,000-vote majority in a seat DAP once held by 18,000.

This is not just a defeat. This is the first tremor of a political earthquake coming for DAP in Sabah, and perhaps beyond. DAP treated non-Malay voters like your fixed deposit, DAP personal insurance policy.

When it mattered most, DAP went quiet, passive, and betrayed the community’s trust. DAP are turning into MCA 2.0.

Sarawak has recognised UEC. Hajiji has promised recognition if GRS returns to power.

Yet at the federal level, DAP remains silent, acting deaf and dumb.

The loudest voices defending Chinese education and rights today are Abang Johari, Haji Noor, and Shafie Apdal, none of them Chinese. Think about that.

Perikatan Nasional (PN) contested 41 seats and won only ONE.

Sabah, with more than 70% Muslim population, delivered a resounding rejection of Perikatan National’s brand of radicalism, racism, and religious extremism.

Even PAS candidate backtracked and dared not utter a word about banning alcohol, gambling, concerts, enforcing dress codes, or implementing hudud.

In Peninsular Malaysia, non-Muslims are PAS’ favourite punching bag, easy targets.

In Sabah, PAS didn’t even dare try.

Why? Because Sabah Muslims rejected PAS Semenanjung Taliban-style politics outright.


Sabahan Muslims are tolerant, respectful, progressive, and moderate.

They do not weaponize race and religion the way PN does.

That is the true face of Malaysian Islam, and Sabah showed it to the entire country. Sabah is proving that a Muslim-majority state can firmly reject extremist politics.

The result of Sabah State election is reminding the nation what unity, maturity, and true Malaysian values look like.

The old chapter of “Sabah for Sabahans” must now evolve into the next chapter: Borneo for Malaysia.

Sabah and Sarawak, you are the original natives of this land. You have preserved the soul of Malaysia when the peninsula lost its way.

The only beacon of hope left is Borneo.

If Sabah and Sarawak stand united, you are no longer just kingmakers, You can be the architects of Malaysia’s renaissance.


Sabah polls: Distrust, anger among Chinese community culminated in major electoral backlash



theVibes.com:

Sabah polls: Distrust, anger among Chinese community culminated in major electoral backlash


Chin, a professor of Asian Studies at the University of Tasmania, said this sense of distrust merged with anger directed at the Democratic Action Party (DAP), culminated in a major electoral backlash

Updated 25 minutes ago · Published on 01 Dec 2025 5:37PM


Frustration had been simmering for some time among voters, said Chin - December 1, 2025

by Alfian Z.M. Tahir


GROWING discontent among Chinese voters over Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s decision to pursue an appeal involving Sabah’s 40 per cent revenue entitlement has compounded Pakatan Harapan’s setback in the recent state election, said political analyst Professor James Chin.

Although Anwar insisted the federal government was merely challenging the wording of the judgment and not the state’s constitutional rights, many voters—particularly in Sabah’s urban Chinese community—felt misled and interpreted the move as a retreat from long-promised autonomy.

Chin, a professor of Asian Studies at the University of Tasmania, said this sense of distrust merged with anger directed at the Democratic Action Party (DAP), culminated in a major electoral backlash.

He noted that PH’s component party suffered severe losses partly because urban Chinese voters believed DAP had drifted away from local priorities.

According to him, frustration had been simmering for some time among voters who felt that DAP leaders in Peninsular Malaysia were exerting excessive influence over the party’s Sabah chapter.

“Many Chinese voters were already unhappy with how DAP performed while in government in Sabah. They felt the party could not clearly articulate what it had delivered for urban communities,” he said.

Chin added that resentment intensified when two sitting Members of Parliament were fielded as state candidates, a move voters viewed as a political overreach.

“To many, it looked like politicians wanting to hold multiple positions at once. Voters generally reject the idea of one person occupying two seats,” he explained.

But the turning point, Chin said, came on nomination day. Photographs of Sabah DAP candidates flanked by senior Peninsular DAP leaders circulated widely and were perceived as evidence that the state chapter lacked autonomy.

“That visual alone was damaging. It reinforced the narrative that DAP in Sabah is directed from across the South China Sea, rather than run by local leaders,” he said.

Another sore point was the party’s muted response to the corruption allegations involving businessman Albert Tei. Chin noted that many urban Chinese voters felt DAP failed to take a principled stance.

“Sabahans expected a firm rejection of any association with corruption. Instead, DAP’s silence was seen as evasive, and Chinese voters reacted strongly to that,” he said.

The shift was most visible in high-density Chinese constituencies—traditionally solid ground for DAP—where voters gravitated instead towards Warisan and Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS).

“When the Chinese vote swung away from DAP, they asked who was realistically capable of forming the government. The results show they leaned towards Warisan, which they saw as having a clearer path,” he added.

Tei was previously detained to assist investigations into claims that he paid substantial sums to a former political aide in a bid to reclaim money he had channelled to several Sabah politicians.

Chin said the combination of DAP’s missteps, unresolved grievances, and the broader frustration with federal leadership culminated in one outcome: a decisive rejection of PH in Sabah’s Chinese-majority areas. – December 1, 2025


Special forces chief knew UK soldiers were executing Afghans but covered it up, whistleblower claims


Special forces chief knew UK soldiers were executing Afghans but covered it up, whistleblower claims


Senior officer issues extraordinary plea to the UK special forces community to ‘decide what you stand for’


Holly Bancroft
Home affairs correspondent
Monday 01 December 2025 08:28 GMT




The head of the UK’s special forces (UKSF) knew soldiers had probably committed war crimes in Afghanistan but failed to act and conducted a “fake exercise” to cover it up, according to damning new testimony.

One of the most senior special forces officers in the British Army told the Afghan war crimes inquiry that he first raised concerns that Afghans were being killed unlawfully and that stories were being invented to disguise the deaths in early 2011.

In a new batch of documents released by the inquiry, the senior officer, known only as N1466, said he tried to get the special forces chief to act, but instead, the director conducted a “fake exercise” of a review that did not get to the bottom of what was happening.

He told the independent inquiry in secret evidence sessions: “I will be clear we are talking about war crimes.”

N1466, who was the assistant chief of staff for operations in UKSF headquarters between 2010 and 2011, said he first became concerned about reports of Afghans being killed on operations around February 2011, when the deaths didn't tally with the number of weapons recovered.

He became further alarmed by reports of Afghans dying in custody after they had apparently tried to make futile attempts to attack their captors, but he said some accounts were "so implausible as to be ridiculous".

He explained his shock when he was later shown photos of dead Afghans by military police, which showed people with headshot wounds, despite the official write-up of the incident saying they had been caught in crossfire.

He told the inquiry: “If we had got this right, we could have stopped it in February 2011... Me trying to argue the case with the director, who has clearly, in my view, made a conscious decision that he is going to suppress this, cover this up and do a little fake exercise to make it look like he’s done something, that’s a charade.”

Lord Justice Haddon-Cave, chair of the Independent Inquiry relating to Afghanistan (PA)

The whistleblower said he came to the view in early 2011 that the military’s Special Investigation Branch (SIB) needed to launch a criminal probe, but that the UKSF in-house lawyer did not provide clear legal advice to that effect.

He said the worrying patterns of deaths were clearly explained to the director of special forces, who “was clearly cognisant back in February that there were things going wrong”.

He accused the director of controlling the information about alleged murders “in a way that I think indicated a desire to keep it low profile”.

He described the director as a “capable, intelligent, astute individual who would have known exactly what was happening”. But instead of referring the incidents to the police, or launching a full investigation, the director commissioned a review into the practice of bringing Afghans with soldiers to search a house after it had been cleared, the inquiry heard.

N1466 said the review “seemed to me to be completely missing the point or, and not necessarily accidentally missing the point”.

He added that “not just one director” of the special forces knew about the war crimes allegations, saying: “Other directors...clearly knew there was a problem in Afghanistan”. Talking about his decision to report the evidence directly to the Royal Military Police in 2015, he said in a witness statement: “I had lost confidence in the willingness of the UKSF chain of command to report the allegations....to SIB”.

In an extraordinary plea to other members of the special forces community to come forward and speak up, N1466 told the inquiry: “It is time to decide what you stand for."

“We didn’t join UKSF for this sort of behaviour... toddlers to get shot in their beds or random killing. It’s not special, it’s not elite, it’s not what we stand for, and most of us I don’t believe, would either wish to condone it or to cover it up.

“It’s not loyalty to your organisation to stand by and watch it go down a sewer,” he said.

N1466 said that Afghan partner units began withdrawing their support for UKSF in protest at the crimes they believed were being committed. This happened for short periods in 2011 but became more sustained in 2013.

In one incident explained to the inquiry, a soldier from an Afghan Partner Unit pulled out a grenade on the way back from a joint operation with Special Forces Unit 1 and threatened to pull it because he was so unhappy with what he had just witnessed.

In another case recalled by N1466, an Afghan burst into a room with UK special forces colleagues, pulled a pistol from its holster, and pointed at a member of UKSF and said something along the lines of “these guys are all murdering our people”.

Referring to one photo of an Afghan killed by UK special forces, N1466 told the inquiry: “Quite clearly the narrative talks about ‘as they moved towards the target area, two men were seen moving around the guesthouse’. Well, this character doesn’t look like he’s been moving around the guesthouse. He looks like he’s in bed. He’s got a blanket over him and he certainly doesn’t look like he’s running around or engaging anybody with a grenade or about to engage anyone.”

Referring to photos of another incident, he said that “you’re not seeing many other bullet wounds other than head shots”, which didn’t tally with the narrative in the operation reports. He told the inquiry about other casualties: “No one can control a long burst of AK47 fire and put a hole in everyone’s head ... It is not plausible and not true.”

He said it didn’t make sense for the individuals to be caught in crossfire, saying: “Why are they all hit in the head?... That really, to me, stood out as being wrong and it doesn’t matter how recently you’ve been to theatre. That makes no difference. That’s wrong.”

He was again concerned about pictures of another incident where dead bodies had weapons laid parallel to them with the stocks up, positioning that “for me isn’t right” if the Afghans had been killed in combat.

Included in the batch of documents released by the inquiry was a summary of an interview between N1466 and the Royal Military Police (RMP).

During the October 2018 interview, he told the RMP of an incident where UKSF1 members sent to clear a compound found people hiding in a room under a mosquito net.

The document read: “They did not reveal themselves, so the UKSF1 shot at the net until there was no movement.

“When the net was uncovered, it was women and children. The incident was covered up, and the individual who did the shooting was allegedly given some form of award to make it look legitimate.”

The Afghanistan Inquiry has released summaries of closed hearings in which members of special forces have given evidence about alleged murders in the wartorn nation between 2010 and 2013.

The inquiry continues.


NATO Needs to Be ‘More Aggressive’ Towards Russia – Top Commander






NATO Needs to Be ‘More Aggressive’ Towards Russia – Top Commander

 

NATO members should find ways to be more aggressive towards Russia, the US-led alliance’s top military chief has said.

Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of the NATO Military Committee, told the Financial Times (FT) in an interview published on Sunday that member states have been weighing options to respond to what he described as Russia’s “hybrid war.”

“We are studying everything … being more aggressive or being proactive instead of reactive is something that we are thinking about,” Dragone said. The commander added that a “pre-emptive strike” could be considered a “defensive action,” though it would be “further away from our normal way of thinking and behavior.”

According to FT, diplomats from Eastern Europe have been especially vocal in demanding tougher actions against Russia, including retaliatory cyberattacks. Dragone noted, however, that NATO’s decision-making has been constrained by legal and ethical concerns, as well as jurisdiction. — RT

 

Our Take: Oh really? That’s your master plan? And here I was assuming that NATO’s entire existence was predicated on an aggressive posture toward Russia and studying ways to become even more aggressive. And I would assume ever since Russia rolled into Ukraine in early 2022, and NATO branded it as an existential threat toward all of Europe, that NATO would have really kicked it up a notch and made preparations for a potential all-out war with Russia.

But no, this whole time NATO has been playing opossum, conserving its deadly energy for the perfect moment — four years after Putin’s invasion; after the Ukrainian military has gotten its ass kicked and regime leaders are resigning in disgrace (after being exposed for stealing hundreds of millions of dollars in aid money from the west); and [as] Trump and Putin are days away from announcing a peace deal — to shift into that highest gear and unleash NeoCon fury onto those damned Ruskies.

I guess I’ve really underestimated the geniuses at NATO. I thought they were in over their heads and had no idea what they were doing; but in reality they were just pretending to be retarded and incompetent to lull Putin into a false sense of security.

Putin thinks that by destroying the Ukrainian-Nazi war machine, exposing its politicians for being grifting frauds, and cornering the regime to the point of desperation — leading to humiliating outcomes — that he can conquer his declared enemy and just win the day?

Jokes on you, Vlad. You have awoken the Jewish Nazis and EuroFags, and filled them with terrible resolve. — GhostofBasedPatrickHenry

Lawmakers Suggest Follow-Up [Venezuelan] Boat Strike Could Be a War Crime

 



Lawmakers Suggest Follow-Up Boat Strike Could Be a War Crime

 

A top Republican and Democrats in Congress suggested on Sunday that American military officials might have committed a war crime in President Trump’s offensive against boats in the Caribbean after a news report said that during one such attack, a follow-up strike was ordered to kill survivors.

The remarks came in response to a Washington Post report on Friday that said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had given a verbal order to kill everyone aboard boats suspected of smuggling drugs, and that this led a military commander to carry out a second strike to kill those who had initially survived an attack in early September.

“Obviously if that occurred, that would be very serious, and I agree that that would be an illegal act,” Representative Mike Turner, Republican of Ohio and a former chairman of the Intelligence Committee, said on “Face the Nation” on CBS.

Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, said on CBS that if the report was accurate, the attack “rises to the level of a war crime.” And on CNN, when asked if he believed a second strike to kill survivors constituted a war crime, Senator Mark Kelly, Democrat of Arizona, answered, “It seems to.”
— The New York Times

AND

Trump Confirms Conversation With Venezuela’s Maduro

 

U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed on Sunday that he had spoken with Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, but did not provide details on what the two leaders discussed.

“I don’t want to comment on it. The answer is yes,” Trump said when asked if he had spoken with Maduro. He was speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One. […]

“I wouldn’t say it went well or badly, it was a phone call,” Trump said regarding the conversation. The revelation of the phone call comes as Trump continues to use bellicose rhetoric regarding Venezuela, while also entertaining the possibility of diplomacy. — Reuters

Our Take:


You mean a land war is not imminent and Maduro is not currently fleeing to Turkey?

That is shocking. [Clip Link] — Chris Paul

FULL PODCAST: THE THINGS WE CANNOT SAY IN MALAYSIA

 

Monday, December 1, 2025



FULL PODCAST: THE THINGS WE CANNOT SAY IN MALAYSIA


There was a technical glitch in uploading this podcast earlier. The earlier podcast was of only 50 minutes duration. 30 minutes of the podcast was missing. The podcast THE THINGS WE CANNOT SAY IN MALAYSIA has since been uploaded again with its full duration of 1hr 26 minutes. This was recorded on Friday 28th November just one day before the Sabah State elections on Saturday.

Here is the link as well:  https://youtu.be/ccd6_8Z0ZxE?si=SVqfp6QeDJlgcfTF

 


 

Did PMX stab DAP in the back?





“Has two-faced PMX ingenuously plotted PH’s demise in Sabah by also backing GRS to skipper state?”






WHILE many detractors are over the moon about DAP’s total 8-0 wipe-out in the recent 17th Sabah state election, one critical observer has gone beyond the Sabah for Sabahan sentiment that has generally rejected peninsula parties/coalitions to argue that the Madani government is very much intact in the Land below the Wind.


This is because amid Pakatan Harapan (PH) contesting in the elections, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had all the while been playing a double-sided game by also having campaigned for Gabungan Rakyat Sabah’s (GRS) president and now two-term Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Nor.


“PH got walloped by Sabahans but did PMX-Madani lose their shirts and trousers, everything in Sabah?” asked Aisehman |  (@Aisehman) in a thought-provoking post on X.


PH got walloped by Sabahans, but did PMX-Madani lose their shirts and trousers, everything, in Sabah? Because while PH contested in the elections, Anwar also campaigned for Hajiji. And all the while, GRS was facing a major corruption scandal and allegations of Hajiji abusing Show more
89
Reply
Copy link


‘PMX still holds the sword’

“All the while, GRS was facing a major corruption scandal and allegations of Hajiji abusing his power to favour Farhash (former PMX’s political secretary-turned- corporate raider Datuk Seri Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak) who is said to be Anwar’s crony.

“Despite all this, Hajiji and GRS not only survived; they won the most seats (29 seats followed by Warisan by 25) and retained power in Sabah.”

As the allegations of corruption and abuse of power remain in the air “like the proverbial sword hanging over the heads of Hajiji and other GRS leaders” Aisehman contended that it was still PMX who called the shots at the end of the day.

app-facebook
Anwar Ibrahim
on Saturday

Tahniah saya ucapkan kepada Ketua Menteri Sabah Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor atas mandat baharu pembentukan Kerajaan Negeri. Kerajaan MADANI menghormati sepenuhnya mesej tegas dan jelas yang telah dilontarkan para pengundi di Sabah, bahawa mereka menuntut perubahan yang nyata setelah sekian lama dihadapkan dengan ketidakadilan dan pengabaian oleh hampir semua parti samada dari Semenanjung mahupun Sabah sendiri.

Alhamdulillah, dalam tiga tahun yang lalu, kami berusaha merungkai set...

See more

“And who holds the sword? Federal which controls the levers of investigation and enforcement does,” argued the poster who is renowned for his counter perspective

“Sabah has just put back in power people who could potentially be the most beholden to Federal interest and influence.

“With Hajiji back in Seri Gaya (CM’s official residence) and Sabah’s governor Tun Musa Aman in Seri Kinabalu, PMX-Madani appears to have strengthened rather than weakened its hold on Sabah.”

Sabah Chinese discontent with PMX

Somehow solidifying Aisheman’s argument, former Barisan Nasional (BN) strategic communication deputy director Datuk Eric See-To painted a notion of PMX having stabbed DAP in the back with “a smug and arrogant borderline threatening remark to the Chinese community” two days before polling.

“You can’t scold me, call me lu siau eh (Hokkien for ‘are you crazy?’) and then come asking for things again. That’s not how it works,” PMX had reportedly said at a Sabah Chinese association dinner in Kota Kinabalu in his final push for PH candidates.

“(This is) as if federal allocations come from his parents’ (PMX) pockets? Which Chinese voter would react well to being called ‘crazy’ and warned in public?” the opposition-slant Madani critic who also blogs under the Lim Sian See moniker hit out on X.


There’s a solid case that DAP’s total wipeout in the Sabah polls was driven by PMX’s growing unpopularity among Chinese voters. Then PMX made things worse two days before polling with a smug and arrogant borderline threatening remark to the Chinese community: “You can’t scold Show more
55
Reply
Copy link

“So of course DAP collapsed – then kept sinking. They didn’t just lose every seat (but) seats they once won by massive margins flipped into massive defeats.

“Even the Sabah DAP chairman and two DAP MPs – including a deputy minister – lost their pants when contesting state seats.”

Amid the brouhaha about the humiliation inflicted on DAP, an observer has exposed an underlying sentiment that many have presumably overlooked.




“The statistics of this Sabah state polls are clear. Only the STUPID can’t see it. PN (Perikatan Nasional) contested 41 seats – won one (36 lost deposits) – of which PAS contested six, won one (five lost deposits),” proffered a commenter to a social media post.

“PH contested 22, won one (one lost deposit). DAP contested eight, didn’t win but didn’t lose any deposit at all. This means that Sabah is not rejecting DAP completely. But rejecting PN/PAS ” – Dec 1, 2025


Main image credit: Bernama