Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Mohamad Hasan’s vibes were the sanest to have emerged from Umno

 


Mohamad Hasan’s vibes were the sanest to have emerged from Umno

Mohamad Hasan’s vibes were the sanest to have emerged from Umno

Umno’s deputy president stuck to a middle-of-the-road stance and his proposed test of PAS’s sincerity was shrewd.

From Terence Netto

Umno’s deputy president Mohamad Hasan (Tok Mat) deserves credit for urging on the party a stance that, to put it broadly, was middle-of-the-road.

He espoused this position in his policy address to the youth, Wanita and Puteri wings of the party.

It was not an easy position to take at a time when rightist voices are shrill within the party such that a disinclination to take the tub-thumping and cymbals-clashing ones would put an exponent on the outs with the muscle flexing crowd.

Not only did Tok Mat reach for the middle octaves, he asserted Umno should not alienate the non-Malays on the Peninsula and its friends in Sabah and Sarawak.

This is the sane middle path that is more recognisably Umno than the leanings of the party towards the ethno-centricism that characterised the Mahathir era (1981-2003).

There are no prizes for guessing who Tok Mat was referring to when he cautioned in his policy address: “You cannot impose your conservative and radical ideology on Umno.”

Although he did not mention names, his suggestion of a test of sincerity of PAS’s desire to collaborate with Umno in state polls and in the general election (GE16) to come was shrewd.

He proposed that PAS dissolve the Terengganu state assembly and allow Umno to contest half the seats in the snap poll.

PAS won 27 state and 7 parliamentary seats the last time that voters in the state went to the polls.

It was a wipeout for Umno.

It would be too much to expect that Umno would simply concede Terengganu to PAS at the next election as part of a collaboration with the Islamist party though that seems to be the drift of the rhetoric emanating from the mullahs.

PAS appears keener than Umno on having such a collaboration.

Hence Tok Mat’s proposed test of PAS’s sincerity that they dissolve the Terengganu state assembly and allow Umno to contest a number of the state seats is not an outlandish proposition.

Unless of course PAS harbours hegemonistic intentions and considers Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis as their fiefdom, and as such off limits to Umno.

Given that Tok Mat has used the occasion of Umno’s general assembly to reiterate that his party rejects conservative and radical leanings in its ideology and following this up with a proposed test of PAS’s sincerity on electoral collaboration, the ball is in the Islamic party’s court, so to speak.

It would be interesting to see how PAS reacts to these leanings and moves by Umno.

Umno is a nationalist party whereas PAS is a religious one; their ideologies cannot easily coexist.

Umno has a modernist outlook whereas PAS, at the end of a long day, would wind up as obscurantist.

It is only realism to accept what all this entails and take one’s drift accordingly.

Terence Netto is a senior journalist and an FMT reader.

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Malaysia won’t allow cargo aiding Israel’s military, says Anwar

 


Malaysia won’t allow cargo aiding Israel’s military, says Anwar

Malaysia won’t allow cargo aiding Israel’s military, says Anwar

Three Israel-bound containers were seized at Port of Tanjung Pelepas in Johor on Aug 19.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said Malaysia remained committed to preventing the country from being used to facilitate military aggression or acts against innocent lives.
PETALING JAYA:
Malaysia will not allow the country to be used as a transit point for shipments that support Israel’s military operations, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said today.

In a Facebook post, Anwar said Malaysia remained committed to preventing the country from being used to facilitate military aggression or acts against innocent lives.

“Malaysia’s position is clear and unequivocal. We will not allow our country to be used as a conduit for any shipment that supports or contributes to Israel’s military capabilities and its atrocities against Palestinians and other innocent lives,” he said in a statement posted on X today.

He said any suspicious shipment would be inspected and investigated in accordance with Malaysian law, adding that decisive action would be taken if any violations were found.

Anwar’s statement comes after Bloomberg reported that authorities had seized three Israel-bound containers at the Port of Tanjung Pelepas in Johor on Aug 19.

The containers reportedly contained electric bicycle parts shipped by a Chinese manufacturer and were bound for the Port of Ashdod, south of Tel Aviv. Their contents are still being investigated.

The seizure followed another incident on Aug 7, when authorities detained a container from the Philippines suspected of containing weapons and destined for Israeli defence technology company Elbit Systems Ltd.

The Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency said the goods were examined to verify their nature, specifications, intended use and classification, as well as to determine whether they were subject to trade control laws.

Malaysia does not have diplomatic relations with Israel.

The Strategic Trade Act 2010 regulates the export of sensitive technology and materials, including measures aimed at preventing terrorism, nuclear proliferation and the spread of weapons of mass destruction.

MACC officer retracts police report against Muhyiddin’s lawyer; court decides not to cite for contempt






MACC officer retracts police report against Muhyiddin’s lawyer; court decides not to cite for contempt



Lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex on August 27, 2026. Picture by Firdaus Latif


Summary

  • The High Court decided not to initiate contempt proceedings against MACC officer Mazery Mohd Zaini after accepting his explanation regarding a police report connected to Muhyiddin's trial.
  • Muhyiddin's lawyers accused Mazery of inappropriate communication, but he clarified the report was to check for information leaks, leading to its withdrawal and apology.
  • The trial continues in November, focusing on three charges of power abuse against Muhyiddin involving RM25.3 million in alleged bribes for his party.


First Published: Tuesday, 15 Sep 2026 7:37 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 15 — The High Court today decided not to begin contempt of court proceedings against Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigation officer Mazery Mohd Zaini, as it accepted the officer’s explanations about his MACC colleague’s police report.

Earlier today, former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin’s lawyers had accused Mazery of contempt of court, due to his actions that led to the police report.


Muhyiddin’s lawyers had pointed out that Mazery was still testifying as the 29th prosecution witness in Muhyiddin’s trial, and should not have communicated with anyone including the MACC colleague who lodged the police report.

High Court judge Noor Ruwena Md Nurdin this afternoon delivered her decision on whether to start contempt of court proceedings against Mazery.


The judge noted that she had told all prosecution witnesses in this trial to not discuss matters in this trial with anyone, while they remain on the witness stand.


“But just now, his explanation is that he wants to check that there is no information leak from MACC itself. So it can be said that this witness is overly-cautious and I accept his explanation. I think I will not proceed to cite for contempt.

“But Datuk Amer, it’s entirely up to you if you want to take further legal action, I don’t want to comment on that. But for the court, I accept his explanation,” the judge said towards the end of today’s court proceedings, referring to Muhyiddin’s lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad.


Mazery had testified yesterday and was supposed to continue testifying today, while the police report was lodged by his MACC colleague last night.



Former Prime Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex on September 2, 2026. Picture by Firdaus Latif



What the police report is about and what happened to it

This morning, Amer highlighted the police report, which he described as a form of “intimidation” against Muhyiddin’s lawyers and an “underhanded tactic” to undermine the trial.

The police report had named Amer as having presented to the court an allegedly classified document, namely Adam Radlan Adam Muhammad’s statement to MACC during investigations.

Amer said however that Muhyiddin’s lawyers did not obtain the document from MACC or through illegal or improper methods, stressing that Muhyiddin’s lawyers had obtained it from Adam Radlan’s lawyers.

Amer said he reserved his rights to take legal action against Mazery, while the latter apologised to Muhyiddin’s lawyers and said he did not intend to tarnish their reputation.

Mazery explained that the police report was lodged to protect MACC’s integrity, as he was worried that Adam Radlan’s statement had been leaked from MACC despite being a classified document.

This afternoon, Mazery returned to the High Court after confirming that there had been no information leaks.

Mazery also confirmed that the police report had been given a “No Further Action” (NFA) status, and a fresh police report had been lodged to withdraw last night’s police report.

“As a result of investigations which I carried out at the headquarters, it was found that there are no information leaks from MACC officers, and I am satisfied that no evidence or documents came from MACC officers,” he told the High Court, saying that last night’s police report had been retracted and has been given “NFA” status.

Mazery also expressed hope that Amer could accept his apology.




KUALAL LUMPUR 16/2/2024 Segambut Bersatu Division Deputy Chief Adam Radlan Adam Muhammad was seen here at Kuala Lumpur Court Complex. PICTURE BY SAYUTI ZAINUDIN



What Mazery told Muhyiddin’s lawyer

After Mazery’s update on the withdrawal of the police report, he was cross-examined by Amer.

Mazery said he had yesterday instructed his subordinate to lodge a police report to determine whether Adam Radlan’s statement had been leaked, but confirmed that this subordinate was not present in court yesterday and would not know what happened in court.

Mazery confirmed that he did not make any checks on whether the document had been leaked before the police report was lodged last night, and confirmed that his checks today with another MACC colleague on whether there had been leaks only took between 15 to 20 minutes.

Mazery confimed he did not contact this MACC colleague yesterday, but disagreed he could have done so before the police report was lodged.

While confirming that he had decided to lodge the police report without first carrying out an internal investigation and without clarifying with Muhyiddin’s lawyers, Mazery denied that the police report was a “deliberate plan” by him to prevent Muhyiddin’s lawyers from asking four recalled prosecution witnesses today about Adam Radlan.

Mazery confirmed that only he and his subordinate had received a copy of last night’s police report, and denied leaking it to a news outlet which had this morning published a news report on the police report.

Among other things, Mazery denied that he wanted to suppress facts that are in favour of Muhyiddin in this case, also disagreeing that the police report was lodged and leaked to the media to deter Amer from pursuing issues linked to Adam Radlan.

Later when asked by lead prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin to clarify why the initial police report was lodged, Mazery stressed it was purely to check if Adam Radlan’s statement had been leaked by MACC officers.

“So when there is none, I was satisfied that there is none, there is no need to continue with that report, that’s why I made an immediate retraction,” he said, adding that he has no malicious intention and that he had cooperated with both the prosecution and Muhyiddin from the start of investigations until now.

Before the judge delivered her decision on whether to cite Mazery for contempt, Wan Shaharuddin also addressed the police report incident in court.

“As the lead prosecutor in this case, I take responsibility for what had happened today. I myself apologise to Datuk Amer on this incident,” Wan Shaharuddin said, before closing the prosecution’s case in the trial after calling in 29 witnesses over more than 30 days of hearing.

When the trial resumes on November 26 and December 1 to 3, the prosecution and Muhyiddin’s lawyers are expected to present their arguments on whether Muhyiddin will have to enter his defence in this case.

In this trial, Muhyiddin is now facing only three charges of power abuse involving RM25.3 million in alleged bribes for his party, Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (from Nepturis Sdn Bhd, Datuk Seri Azman Yusoff, KCJ Engineering Sdn Bhd and Mamfor Sdn Bhd).