Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Israeli government accused of complicity as settlers demolish Jericho homes



Israeli government accused of complicity as settlers demolish Jericho homes

Israeli settlers demolish homes in village, leaving rubble and fear among displaced Palestinian families in Jericho.

Save

Palestinian in Ein al-Duyuk sees settler bulldozer furthering damage in yard [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]
A Palestinian man in Ein al-Duyuk looks on as a settler-operated bulldozer further damages a yard [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]

Jericho, occupied West Bank – Where Palestinian homes once stood among orchards and swimming pools on the southwestern edge of Jericho, there is now only flattened earth.

Somewhere beneath the packed dirt lie entire houses, dumped into pits and smoothed over. Only a few severed water pipes hint that anyone ever lived here – that, and the piles of rubble yet to be buried by an Israeli settler’s excavator.

“Why do you hide the crime you’re committing?” asked Khalil al-Razim, 60, a Jerusalemite who has spent his summers on a plot of land here in the area of Ein al-Duyuk for more than a decade.

Beside al-Razim’s house, a pile of rubble more than two metres high blocks the entrance to the home of his neighbour, Mohammad Salah. Next to the pile, Salah stood with one of his four children. He now climbs his own fence to reach his house.

Six months earlier in February, during the first settler attack to tear through the area – with homes demolished and damaged, and residents attacked and robbed – a settler arrived with a bulldozer and began demolishing fences and houses in the neighbourhood, including parts of Salah’s home. This summer, the same work resumed under the guise of “clearing” the ruins those earlier attacks had left behind – and in the process, the Israeli excavator dumped piles of rubble in front of Salah’s home.

“How am I supposed to get into my own house?” Salah recalled asking the settler.

“That’s not my problem, how you get into your house,” the man told him, according to Salah. “Can’t get into your house? Go around another way from here. This land is not coming back to you.”

Since July 19, settler-operated excavators have kept coming on a near-daily basis – for the supposed purpose of “clearing waste”, but doing far more than that. The settler behind the attacks, identified by locals and in legal filings from the Israeli state as Hanan Herbst, is escorted by soldiers on every visit. No order has ever been shown to residents – no paper a lawyer can hold up in court. “Not an official order,” Salah said. “It’s all thuggery. Just brute force, nothing else.”

What is unfolding here, according to residents, lawyers and the state’s own court filings, is a subversion of normal legal processes that have all but erased the line between settler ambition and state authority. In practice, Israeli authorities have given the settlers close to a free hand over an entire Palestinian neighbourhood.

“This is a state with no law,” Salah said. “No decency in it. A state of thugs.”

Al Jazeera reached out to Israeli authorities for comment, but received no response. Herbst was also reached by phone, but hung up after being told he was being contacted by Al Jazeera. He has not responded to further attempts at contact.

Ali Kaabneh in front of his partially destroyed home he still lives in [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]
Ali Kaabneh in front of his partially destroyed home he still lives in [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]

A minister and a pogrom

Herbst owns an Israeli settler outpost called Armonot Farm, built without authorisation on a ridge overlooking Ein al-Duyuk in the summer of 2024. It was initially illegal even under Israel’s own rules, but the Israeli cabinet formally recognised it as a settlement, under the name Daya, at the end of March.

The neighbourhood below, known locally as Stih, sits a few dozen metres from the ruins of the Hasmonean and Herodian winter palaces, an archaeological site Israel’s government has designated a flagship for a planned network of “Judeo-centric” heritage parks across the West Bank. On the morning of February 10, Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu posted a video of himself at the ruins, Israeli flag in hand. “Any place built on the heritage of the Jewish people,” he said, “we will destroy it.”

Within hours of the post, Palestinian residents said, dozens of masked settlers descended on the area from the Armonot settlement and other outposts in what activists and residents call an eight-hour “pogrom”. Two Palestinian communities sit side by side here, and both were hit that day: a group of Bedouins closest to the ruins, home to roughly a hundred people from the Kaabneh tribe, and the neighbourhood of mostly villa-style homes belonging to Palestinian families from elsewhere, including Salah’s and al-Razim’s.

Ali Kaabneh, 40, a Bedouin herder, was inside his house when the February 10 attack began.

“They started throwing stones at me,” he said. “They forced me and my wife out of the house. There were 13 families with me – they drove us out with stones and weapons. It was a threat: I’m going to die if I don’t get out.”

When the settlers withdrew roughly eight hours later, Kaabneh’s 150 sheep had scattered, and his licensed tractor was gone, driven up towards the settlement. Thirteen houses in the Bedouin compound were demolished that day, he said. In the neighbouring community, three homes were destroyed completely, according to Hussein Taha, a longtime resident.

Many of the Bedouin families have lived since then in the ruins of their partially destroyed homes, or without shelter at all, according to Kaabneh.

A view of the area Palestinian residents say was razed by an Israeli settler in Ein al-Duyuk [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]
A view of the area Palestinian residents say was razed by an Israeli settler in Ein al-Duyuk [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]

‘Clearing waste’

For months afterwards, “there was a kind of calm”, Taha said, during which settlers nonetheless carried out thefts of people’s properties and uprooted trees. “But whoever wanted to fix his wall, [Herbst] would come to him and stop him.”

But behind the scenes, developments continued. In March, the Israeli military issued a seizure order for a strip of Palestinian land for an access route to the archaeological site – an order not handed to affected residents until weeks after it was issued – part of a sharp increase in such orders that Israeli NGOs Emek Shaveh and Kerem Navot say now overwhelmingly serve settler rather than security interests.

That “calm” ended on July 19, at 8:30am, when Herbst arrived with a bulldozer – ostensibly to bury rubble from February’s attack, but soon damaging and destroying property well beyond it. The walls of four homes were destroyed or damaged in the first day alone, according to Taha. When residents and Israeli solidarity activists reached out to police, the military, the Palestinian District Coordination and Liaison Office (DCO) and the Civil Administration that day, they were told no one knew anything about it.

By afternoon, the official line had shifted, according to Yael Sela, a cofounder of the Palestine Solidarity co-op that has maintained a presence in the community since February: an unnamed “high-ranking” military figure, she was told, had authorised the work – to “clear waste”.

In the weeks since, residents and activists say, the bulldozers have demolished or damaged additional houses, alleys, orchards and gardens, and dug pits to bury the debris inside the residential area. Soldiers escort Herbst and keep activists back, citing an ambiguous “closed zone”; no official order has been produced for locals, though activists attempting to enter and document the site have been arrested.

Lawyer Tawfiq Jabareen filed for an emergency injunction at Israel’s High Court on July 23, then again, urgently, on July 29, when the demolitions intensified rather than stopped.

What came back, on the night of July 30, was the state’s own account of how Herbst came to be there – a filing, which Al Jazeera obtained, that revealed an extraordinary example of the state deputising settlers to carry out demolitions and land takeover.

The filing revealed that a state-backed arrangement granting Israeli settlers agricultural use of the land long predated February’s settler attack. According to the state’s account, a March 2025 agreement was reached between Herbst and the Settlement Division of the World Zionist Organization to cultivate “state land” for agriculture.

Following February’s mass settler attack that demolished the Palestinian homes in the area, in May, the Binyamin Regional Council asked the Civil Administration to let Herbst clear “building waste” from “previous demolitions”, without specifying that those demolitions were the settlers’ own making. Nonetheless, the Civil Administration approved the request. The Jordan Valley Brigade commander, Colonel Gilad Shriki, then approved a military escort for Herbst.

At least some of the Palestinian homes in the area have been under a longstanding Israeli court injunction protecting them from demolitions. The agreement instructed Herbst not to damage structures or trees and to stay within the allocated area – instructions that, residents and activists say, have been violated at every turn, under military escort.

“The settler has demolished, and continues to demolish, buildings and uproot trees, despite the existence of restraining orders from the court in Jerusalem barring the army from demolishing them,” said Jabareen, who filed his petition against the army, the settler and the state prosecution together. “That is: the army circumvented the court’s decision and sent the settler to do the demolishing instead.”

“The Prosecution claims the [Settlement Division of the World Zionist Organization] leased the land to the settler,” he said, “even though the Civil Administration itself had barred the settler from demolishing any building or any tree.”

“My analysis,” Jabareen said, “is that the army and the Civil Administration are now in the settlers’ grip, and there’s no longer any real difference between them.

“The law and court rulings mean nothing to them. They believe imposing facts on the ground is stronger than any court decision.”

Destroyed home in the Bedouin community in Ein al-Duyuk [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]
Destroyed home in the Bedouin community in Ein al-Duyuk [Courtesy of Unarmed Civilian Protection in Palestine]

‘Why can’t I go back to my home?’

Across the razed land, what remains standing is small strips of common-area vegetation belonging to no one in particular. The state’s initial response suggests Herbst plans to begin cultivating the razed land as early as this week. The state maintains the ground itself is state land, now allocated to Herbst for agricultural use – though, as Sela noted, no map or boundary of that allocation has ever been produced.

“The purpose of this act of destruction was to terrorise the Bedouin community, and to create the impression that this was an empty area with nobody living there – only piles of demolished concrete,” said Hussein Taha. “Then this ‘kind settler’ wants to come and ‘clean up’ the area, cultivate it, and benefit from it, because he supposedly loves agriculture and green gardens.”

For al-Razim, whose family bought land here more than a decade ago, what is happening feels familiar. He is from Silwan, in occupied East Jerusalem, where settlers have spent decades pushing Palestinian families out through a legal system that, he says, offers no real recourse. His own son’s rented home in Silwan was demolished by authorities. Due to the traditional system of ownership in the area, Palestinian-held land often remains undivided family inheritance, unregistrable under rules that demand proof no family can produce.

“They know there’s no tabu [land deed] for it,” al-Razim said. “But [they tell us to] bring proof. So they exploit that gap.”

Unable to safely reach their home and fearing settler attacks, Salah has moved his wife and four children into a rented apartment in Bethlehem, for 2,000 shekels ($667) a month, though he is unable to find work there. He goes back to what used to be his house, mostly alone, when he can.

“Any time I bring it up with my wife, she breaks down,” said Salah outside his blocked home. “She says to me, ‘We want to go back to our home.’ My kids say to me, ‘Why can’t we go back to our home?’ I don’t know what to say to them.”

Attempts to reason with the settlers have failed. “These settlers don’t try to speak with you,” he added. “They only speak in the language of power.”

He paused. “I feel like I’m weak,” he said. “In front of my son, I’m weak – I can’t protect him, I can’t get him back to his home. There’s no worse feeling than standing in front of your kids and your wife and not being able to protect your home.”

Salah glanced at his son accompanying him that day. “I always told my kids: If you don’t make trouble, nobody will bother you. If you don’t cause problems, the government won’t come after you. And my son says to me, ‘Dad, you’re a liar. Look – we don’t make trouble. And yet they came and destroyed our house.'”

He gestured at the razed land adjacent to their home, on the other side of the rubble. He looked up towards the hillside above – Herbst’s excavator visible on the slope of the now-legalised settlement.

“What am I supposed to say to him?”

Israeli settlers feel invincible after Gaza genocide



  • 18m ago
    (04:15 GMT)

    Israeli settlers feel invincible after Gaza genocide

    Israeli settler attacks in the occupied West Bank have become more brazen due to a sense of invincibility following Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, argues Muhannad Ayyash, a professor of sociology at Mount Royal University in Calgary.

    “One of the big things that has happened is that these settler movements have seen how Israel has gotten away with genocide on the world stage,” Ayyash told Al Jazeera.

    “The settler movement, just like Israeli politicians, believes that this is a moment in history where they can finish off the Palestinian question once and for all,” he said.

    Ayyash added that this sense of impunity among a majority of Israelis has been encouraged by US complicity.

    “Material pressure and economic isolation of the Israeli state is the only path, because right now, they keep getting rewarded.”

    An armed Israeli settler stands on a hillside overlooking the Palestinian town of Tell, in the occupied West Bank, Friday, July 31, 2026, during a march held days after deadly clashes involving settlers, Israeli forces and Palestinian residents in the area earlier in the week. (AP Photo/Majdi Mohammed)
    An armed Israeli settler stands on a hillside overlooking the Palestinian town of Tal, in the occupied West Bank, on July 31, 2026 [Majdi Mohammed/AP]
  • 33m ago
    (04:00 GMT)

    Iranian regime at its weakest point since 1979, US ambassador says

    United States Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee says the Iranian regime is “the weakest they have been since they took over in 1979”, praising Trump’s willingness “to bankrupt them” in an interview with Newsmax.

    “The operation between the United States and Israel did an enormous level of damage,” Huckabee said.

    Welcoming Trump’s military actions in the region, Huckabee claimed that Iran has “carried out actions directly and through its proxies that have killed thousands of Americans”.

    “I don’t know why a lot of Americans seem to be oblivious to the fact that this issue with Iran is not a Middle East issue. It is a global issue,” he added.

    “Hezbollah is in 12 Western Hemisphere countries already. They’re not there because they’re opening snow cone stands in South America. They are there because they have an ultimate goal, and that’s death to America,” Huckabee told Newsmax.

    “It’s what they’ve been saying for 47 and a half years. We need to take them seriously.”

***


Huckabee is a notorious Top Ampu for shailoks 😡😡😡



Podcasting duo’s arrest raises questions about selective policing of 'sensitive views'










Podcasting duo’s arrest raises questions about selective policing of 'sensitive views'


Zarrah Morden
Published: Aug 12, 2026 7:00 AM
Updated: 12:21 PM



The arrest of two podcasters - The Gut Shot producer Shamsul Saad and Let's Get It producer Bryan Kong - over remarks touching on race, religion, and politics has sparked a debate over the limits of free speech in Malaysia.

Shamsul and Kong - the latter of whom was misidentified by multiple media as local comedian Brian Tan - were arrested on Aug 6 and held for two days over an episode of Kong’s podcast featuring Shamsul, titled “Malaysia Introduced Me to Racism”.

The episode aired last month on July 2, but clips of it began to circulate among conservative circles last week, sparking an uproar over Shamsul’s remarks regarding religion.

During the interview, Shamsul blamed race-based policies, the abandonment of English-medium education, and an overemphasis on religious subjects initiated during Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s 1986-1991 tenure as education minister for breeding mediocrity and degrading national standards.

Highlighting growing religious pressure, he shared that his daughter resigned as a school prefect over headscarf enforcement, while panning non-Muslim politicians who wear the hijab to pander to voters as an insult to Muslim women resisting such mandates.





He also called for sweeping structural overhauls across Malaysia’s systems, including legally mandated equal opportunity laws and the abolition of religious political parties.

The remarks led to investigations under three different sections of the Penal Code covering remarks that hurt religious feelings, provoke a breach of the peace, and incite offences against the state or public peace.

Kong and Shamsul were also investigated under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act, which covers misuse of network facilities.

In a video days after being released from police custody, Shamsul slammed the government for using “Gestapo” tactics and the Sedition Act to punish two individuals for simply sharing their personal views.

Shamsul also called out the authorities for selective enforcement, pointing out that other individuals facing multiple police reports were never remanded, before pledging to continue fighting against political oppression to save the country.


Police tactics questioned


Speaking to Malaysiakini, the duo’s lawyer Siti Kasim questioned why the two were treated differently.

While Shamsul was the main subject of controversy, police had allowed him to schedule an appointment for questioning.

Kong, who was the interviewer, on the other hand, had 10 police officers turn up at his home to bring him to the Klang Utara district police headquarters.

Shamsul was arrested when he decided to turn up at the police station early to support Kong.


Lawyer Siti Kasim


Siti questioned whether the inconsistent treatment between the men was because of their ethnicities.

“One participant was allowed some latitude in arranging when to give his statement, while the other was confronted at his home by a large police presence and compelled to follow the police to the station.

“The authorities must explain the difference objectively. Race must never influence how police discretion is exercised,” she said.

The police have not responded to Malaysiakini's request for comment.

Siti further said that greater institutional restraint was warranted given that the complainant reportedly came from a religious authority.

“A state religious body is powerful. It should be capable of answering criticism with facts and reason.

“It should not appear to be using the criminal justice system to shield itself, religion, or religious orthodoxy from scrutiny,” she asserted.


Whither free speech?

Separately, former Selangor Bar chairperson Kokila Vaani Vadiveloo said the Sedition Act should not be used whenever speech touches on sensitive issues such as race or religion.

She said Kong and Shamsul’s discussion centred on personal experiences and such comments should, at least prima facie, be distinguished from attacks on a particular race or religion.


Former Selangor Bar chairperson Kokila Vaani Vadiveloo


She pointed to Singapore’s repeal of its Sedition Act in 2022, noting that the country retained more targeted offences relating to serious racial or religious disharmony, incitement to violence, and breaches of the peace.

Kokila said the central concern in the present case was where to draw the line between criticism of a religious community and criticism of the political use or performance of religion.

Meanwhile, Centre for Independent Journalism executive director Wathshlah Naidu described the police action against Kong and Shamsul as “extremely disproportionate”.

Arguing that the arrests appeared to be a response to public outrage, she said the issues discussed were politically sensitive but did not necessarily amount to incitement or sedition.

She also questioned the need to detain both individuals for two days, while seizing their phones and other devices.

Siti, Kokila, and Wathshlah agreed that Malaysia was likely to see more cases involving controversial speech unless there were meaningful changes to laws and enforcement practices.


CIJ executive director Wathshlah Naidu


Wathshlah said the issue was ultimately political, institutional, and legal, as Malaysia’s racial and religious divisions intersected with competing political interests while the existing legal framework gave the state extensive powers over speech.

“The problem, thus, is multi-pronged. Hence, the need to address the root causes of the divide, rather than look for a band-aid solution,” she explained.

She urged the government to encourage a culture of debate, rebuttal, and clarification, resorting to legal action only when truly necessary.


READ MORE:




Apa lagi Melayu Negeri Sembilan mahu?

 


Apa lagi Melayu Negeri Sembilan mahu?

Apa lagi Melayu Negeri Sembilan mahu?

Dengan Yamtuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz yang berkeadilan, apakah lagi yang kalian mahu?

faisal tehrani

PRN Negeri Sembilan 2026 telah pun berakhir. Akan tetapi, malangnya, Adat Perpatih di negeri tersebut masih ditunggang dan ‘dilacurkan’ oleh segelintir mereka yang mengaku pengamal adat.

Hal ini dapat dinilai memandangkan terdapatnya satu perintah mandamus dikemukakan pada 17 Julai 2026 di Mahkamah Tinggi untuk memaksa Menteri Besar Negeri Sembilan yang baharu, Ismail Lasim, menyingkirkan Yang Dipertuan Besar Negeri Sembilan, Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir.

Keinginan untuk menurunkan Tuanku Muhriz dari takhta telah mengheret seluruh Negeri Sembilan, malah seluruh negara, ke dalam kancah politik berbahaya.

Padahal, di dalam Adat Perpatih terdapat tuntutan dalam terombo dan perbilangan agar berlaku taat kepada pemimpin, atau raja yang adil.

Di dalam masyarakat yang mengamalkan Adat Perpatih, seorang pemimpin dihormati kerana terdapat anjuran bahawa mereka itu ‘ditinggikan seranting, didahulukan selangkah’.

Pemimpin, baik Undang mahupun raja, dalam hal ini Yamtuan Besar, diletakkan di tempatnya, atau takhtanya, dan itu semua berlaku dengan prosedur yang mana dalam adat dinamakan ‘alur dan patut’.

Terombo Adat Perpatih menyatakan begini:

‘Yang disebut pemimpin banyak ragamnya,
Ada kecil ada besarnya
Ada rendah ada tingginya
Ada pula letak tempatnya
Ada pula susun aturnya
Ada pula alur patutnya’.

Usaha menurunkan Yamtuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz, menerusi pemasyhuran raja palsu, penarikan sokongan dalam kerajaan negeri sehingga mengakibatkan pembubaran DUN dan berlakunya PRN Negeri Sembilan 1 Ogos lalu, dan kini usaha memaksa menteri besar baharu menandatangani sesuatu yang enggan dilakukannya menerusi mandamus, adalah satu tindak-tanduk derhaka.

Di dalam Adat Perpatih ada penekanan mengenai hal ini di dalam teromba:

‘Adat rumah adat tuanya
Adat kampung adat penghulunya
Adat negeri ada rajanya
Tua rumah membawa hikmah
Tua penghulu menghapus malu
Tua raja tegak daulatnya’.

Di dalam Adat Perpatih, kita diminta mengelak dan menghindar sejenis pemimpin, pembesar adat atau penghulu yang diberi gelar sebagai Tuk Pincang Panjang Lidah.

Menurut Mohd Rosli Saludin dalam ‘Sejarah Adat Perpatih Seri Menanti’ (2022), Tuk Pincang Panjang Lidah ini adalah pemimpin yang ‘suka berbohong, memfitnah atau bercakap tentang sesuatu yang tidak benar.’

Satu hal yang perlu masyarakat Melayu pengamal Adat Perpatih fahami adalah tindak-tanduk mereka diperhatikan oleh bangsa bukan Melayu di Negeri Sembilan.

Rosli, dalam buku yang sama, pernah mengatakan bahawa identiti Negeri Sembilan tidak seharusnya mengabaikan kemajmukan masyarakatnya. Ujar beliau:

“…dalam membicarakan konsep dan pengertian Adat Perpatih di Negeri Sembilan yang boleh memperkuatkan bangsa pada hari ini, kita akan membicarakan tentang kepentingan budaya asal yang diubah untuk dijadikan budaya bersama rakyat Negeri Sembilan bagi mewujudkan identiti dan peribadi rakyat majmuk yang bersifat seragam. Masyarakat Negeri Sembilan ialah suatu masyarakat yang bersifat majmuk dan pelbagai. Ia juga disebut sebagai masyarakat Jawi iaitu masyarakat yang bercampur dari pelbagai latar belakang. Masyarakat Negeri Sembilan itu masyarakat Jawi, maka setiap bangsa atau ras dalam sistem sosial Negeri Sembilan pastinya berbeza antara satu sama lain, khasnya dari segi latar belakang. Tidak terkecuali berbeza adalah daripada segi adat dan budaya. Oleh sebab itu, keputusan yang telah dicapai tentang identiti Negeri Sembilan perlu diperincikan supaya menjadi lebih tepat. Contohnya: Keputusan Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri Sembilan pada 19 November 1997 telah mewujudkan identiti Negeri Sembilan merangkumi rakyat jelata, jabatan kerajaan, agensi kerajaan, syarikat swasta, hotel, persatuan, peniaga dan lain-lain.”

Adalah sangat penting Negeri Sembilan kekal makmur dan terus terpelihara di bawah pemerintah adat yang berwibawa, bukan ditunggang-terbalikkan oleh Tuk Pincang Panjang Lidah kaki TikTok.

Tambahan pula, Negeri Sembilan bukan semata-mata Adat Perpatih.

Di kawasan Lukut, membawa ke pinggir pantai, Negeri Sembilan juga dihuni penghuni dengan Adat Melayu Linggi. Mereka memerhatikan pergaduhan sesetengah pengamal Adat Perpatih dengan rasa meluat dan jengkel.

Mengapakah ada Melayu pengamal Adat Perpatih merasakan mereka boleh melanggar adat ini?

Ini kerana hierarki pemerintahan dalam Adat Perpatih datang dari bawah. Ia sendiri adalah satu sistem demokrasi yang mulus.

Menurut Rosli dalam ‘Sejarah Adat Perpatih Seri Menanti’, sistem pemilihan pemimpin dalam Adat Perpatih ini cukup molek dan tidak boleh diganggu gugat oleh penderhaka:

“Di Negeri Sembilan telah mengamalkan sistem pemerintahan berdasarkan Adat Perpatih, iaitu kedaulatan berada di tangan rakyat. Mengikut hierarki pemerintahan Adat Perpatih, pelantikan pemimpin dibuat daripada peringkat paling bawah, iaitu Anak Buah, diikuti oleh Buapak, Lembaga dan Undang yang kemudiannya melantik Yang Dipertuan Besar. Ini menunjukkan sistem pemilihan pemimpin di Negeri Sembilan mempunyai unsur demokrasi. Sistem pemerintahannya telah melahirkan peraturan hidup seperti kepentingan bersama, semangat bergotong-royong, permuafakatan dan sikap saling menghormati antara satu sama lain. Sistem ini lebih mementingkan permuafakatan dan semangat kerjasama antara suku semasa memilih pemimpin. Secara rasminya terdapat 11 Yang Dipertuan Besar Negeri Sembilan, iaitu bermula dengan Raja Melewar pada tahun 1773 hingga 1795, diikuti oleh Yamtuan Hitam pada tahun 1795 hingga 1808, Yamtuan Lenggang pada tahun 1808 hingga 1824, Yamtuan Radin pada tahun 1830 hingga 1861 dan Yamtuan Imam pada tahun 1861 hingga 1869. Namun, pada tahun 1869 hingga 1872 Tengku Puan Intan telah dilantik menjadi Pemangku Raja. Kemudiannya, diikuti oleh Yamtuan Antah pada tahun 1872 hingga 1888, Tuanku Muhamad pada tahun 1888 hingga 1933, diikuti Tuanku Abdul Rahman pada 1933 hingga 1960, Tuanku Munawir pada tahun 1960 hingga 1967 dan Tuanku Ja’afar pada tahun 1967 hingga 2008. Seterusnya, Tuanku Muhriz telah dilantik sebagai Yang Dipertuan Besar Negeri Sembilan yang baharu, bermula pada tahun 2008 sehingga kini bagi menggantikan almarhum Tuanku Ja’afar yang mangkat.”

Usaha melakukan pelengseran Yamtuan Besar secara ‘non-adat’ atau tidak demokratik ini siapa yang empunya? Mandamus, pemaksaan dari atas kini sedang diusahakan.

Siapakah dalang atau bekap di sebalik semua ini? Tuk Pincang Panjang Lidah ini beroleh biaya daripada siapa? Gerakan ini memerlukan pendanaan besar, apakah ‘end game’ mereka?

Krisis adat dan kepimpinan yang sedang berlaku di Negeri Sembilan ini membuka jalan, satu hikmah, untuk membersihkan masyarakat daripada Tuk Pincang Panjang Lidah.

Krisis di Sungei Ujong dan Rembau telah diputuskan dengan Penghulu atau Undang yang baharu dan rasmi.

Insya-Allah, hal yang sama akan menyusul di Jelebu dan Johol, malah segala yang tidak patut di Tampin juga boleh dibuka kembali.

Ini kerana di dalam Adat Perpatih terdapat satu perbilangan ‘puar condong ke perut’, iaitu memastikan pemilihan pimpinan tidak dipengaruhi oleh mereka yang berkepentingan dan beragenda.

Arwah Rosli selaku salah seorang pakar adat pernah menyatakan dalam buku beliau setiap telingkah dan kelahi hendaklah dibereskan secara tertib menurut adat.

‘Institusi Yamtuan di Negeri Sembilan telah bertambah kukuh apabila wujudnya Undang-undang Tubuh Kerajaan Negeri Sembilan 1959 dan ini boleh dijadikan panduan penting.

Amalan adat setiap Luak tetap dihormati melalui Undang-Undang Tubuh ini dan semuanya dinyatakan secara terang dan jelas sekali.

Pergeseran dalam lantikan kepimpinan Adat Perpatih seharusnya dielakkan mulai sekarang. Badan yang dicadangkan tadi haruslah bertindak menyediakan setiap panduan Adat Perpatih untuk dijadikan sebagai rujukan penting.

Jika berlaku apa-apa masalah, panduan yang disediakan itu dapat dijadikan sebagai bahan penting dan boleh dibahaskan bersama pakar yang terpilih. Pakar ini pula jangan seperti puar condong ke perut yang mempunyai kepentingan sendiri.’

Adakah perintah mandamus ini sesuatu yang beradat, beradab dan tertib? Siapakah Tuk Pincang Panjang Lidah dalam hal mandamus di Negeri Sembilan ini? Siapakah kaki derhaka tidak sudah-sudah? Mengapa terdapat Melayu Negeri Sembilan pengamal Adat Perpatih bersekongkol dengan mereka?

Tidakkah mereka malu kini seisi negara telah tahu yang Melayu Negeri Sembilan mudah tertipu? Mengapakah kalian betah hidup lima tahun lagi di bawah Tuk Pincang Panjang Lidah? Dengan Yamtuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz yang berkeadilan, apakah lagi yang kalian mahu?