Friday, September 25, 2026

Spell out the offence: Aminudin challenges Negeri MB over royal dispute allegations





Spell out the offence: Aminudin challenges Negeri MB over royal dispute allegations



Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar Datuk Ismail Lasim speaks during a special press conference with the Negeri Sembilan executive council members in Seremban on September 24, 2026. — Bernama pic


Summary

  • Former Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun, has urged the current Menteri Besar, Datuk Ismail Lasim, to clarify alleged shortcomings of the previous administration, particularly regarding state traditions and royal institution issues.
  • Aminuddin insists the public deserves specifics on any claimed breaches of the Negeri Sembilan Constitution (UUTKNS) 1959 during his tenure, including when these occurred.
  • He expressed readiness to provide documentation to substantiate decisions made during his time in office.
  • Additionally, Aminuddin questioned Ismail's decision to sign a proclamation document related to the Yang Dipertuan Besar's position, which Aminuddin had previously opted not to sign over process concerns.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 3:47 PM MYT


SEREMBAN, Sept 25 — Former Negeri Sembilan menteri besar Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun has called on current Menteri Besar Datuk Ismail Lasim to specify the alleged shortcomings of the previous administration that led to issues involving the state’s customary traditions and royal institution.

Aminuddin said the public had the right to know what actions were allegedly not taken during his tenure as Menteri Besar, including the specific provisions of the Laws of the Constitution of Negeri Sembilan (UUTKNS) 1959 that were allegedly breached and when the alleged violation occurred.

"What actions were said to have been overlooked? Which provisions of the UUTKNS 1959 were allegedly breached and when did the alleged breach occur?

"If there was an offence, state clearly what it was. If there was a violation of the law, identify the relevant provision. On an issue of this magnitude, the public deserves clear and verifiable facts,” he said in a Facebook post today.


Aminuddin said he was prepared to take responsibility for decisions made during his tenure as Menteri Besar by providing relevant documents, dates and legal provisions based on official records.

Yesterday, Ismail said the issue in the state did not stem from the current administration but was a problem inherited from the previous government.

Meanwhile, the Port Dickson Member of Parliament also questioned Ismail’s decision to sign a proclamation document related to the position of the Yang Dipertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, despite previously choosing not to sign the same document.


Aminuddin said the proclamation document dated April 19 was presented to him on April 20 while he was still Menteri Besar, for his signature under Article 10(2) of the UUTKNS 1959.

"I decided not to sign the document. If I, as Menteri Besar at the time, could make that decision due to doubts over the process, how could the signature of the next Menteri Besar appear on the same document?

"Datuk Ismail, with his legal background, would certainly understand the importance of the process. The issue involving Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir is about whether the process was properly followed or had flaws from the beginning,” he said.

Aminuddin said Article 10 of the UUTKNS 1959 not only covers matters relating to the powers concerning the position of the Yang Dipertuan Besar, but also sets out procedures that must be fulfilled, including matters related to a full and complete inquiry. — Bernama

Anwar wraps China visit with RM36.8b in trade, investment pledges





Anwar wraps China visit with RM36.8b in trade, investment pledges



Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim holds a bilateral meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang at the Mingyuan Hall of the West Lake State Guest House in Hangzhou on September 24, 2026. — Bernama pic


Summary

  • Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's visit to China marked a significant enhancement of Malaysia-China strategic relations, moving beyond routine diplomacy to solidify Malaysia's role as a key partner in Southeast Asia.
  • This visit resulted in a potential RM28.6 billion investment in high-impact sectors, reflecting mutual trust and economic cooperation.
  • Discussions also addressed the concerns of local MSMEs and emphasized ethical digital technology, fair trade, and skills development.
  • The relationship, built on strong personal ties between Anwar and Premier Li Qiang, positions Malaysia to maximize economic benefits through MADANI Diplomacy.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 4:06 PM MYT


HANGZHOU, Sept 25 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's three-day working visit to Shanghai and Hangzhou, China, is not just a routine diplomatic trip, but rather a new benchmark for the continuation of strategic relations that strengthen cooperation in various fields between the two countries.

Amidst the global geopolitical and economic uncertainties, the MADANI Diplomacy approach brought by Putrajaya has proven to be fruitful, thus strengthening Malaysia's role as Beijing's main strategic partner in the Southeast Asian region.

The working visit at the invitation of the Chinese government not only strengthens bilateral relations, but also opens up new opportunities for Malaysia to expand investments, export markets and cooperation in strategic and high-value economic areas.

Among the main returns of the visit was the potential investment worth RM28.6 billion from meetings with 26 Chinese companies, including five of the republic's giants, particularly in high-impact sectors such as semiconductors, mainstreaming artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, electric vehicles (EV), battery materials, advanced optics, biotechnology and advanced manufacturing.


The commitment of companies such as robotics giants AgiBot Innovation, ZTE Corporation, Alibaba Group, Geely Automobile Holdings and Huawei Technologies to increase investment is based on confidence in the stability and policies implemented by the MADANI Government.

Also achieved as a result of this visit was the potential export to China worth RM8.2 billion for a period of one to three years.

Summarising the overall outcome of the visit, Anwar, who is also the Finance Minister, said the relationship between Malaysia and China is now at a very strong level and is developing positively.


Describing the close relationship between Malaysia and China today as having gone beyond the usual diplomatic framework, the Prime Minister said this bilateral relationship is based on mutual trust, sincerity and confidence in order to bring prosperity and benefits to the people of both countries.

During the packed working visit, Anwar stressed the long-standing trust and mutual confidence forming the basis of the Malaysia-China bilateral relationship and cooperation that goes beyond traditional diplomatic ties.

The Malaysia-China relationship also translates into a broader agenda covering connectivity, protection of local enterprises, the digital economy, and talent and skills development.

While delivering a keynote address at the plenary session of WorldSkills Shanghai 2026, Anwar said Malaysia has elevated Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET) as the core of the country's industrial policy and an instrument of economic transformation, particularly in ensuring talent development goes hand in hand with investment inflows.

"Malaysia and China are well positioned to do more together. Investments come to Malaysia for various reasons. But we all know that it grows especially when there are sufficient skills to support it,” he said.

While in Hangzhou, Malaysia's first-ever participation in the Fifth Global Digital Trade Expo (GDTE) provided exposure to the exploration of new technologies and AI applications that deserve to be learned and drawn from China's rapid progress.

Malaysia also offers a stable, well-connected and business-friendly base for partners from China and globally to forge strategic partnerships.

Malaysia's participation in both important Chinese events and Anwar's presence to deliver the keynote address at the WorldSkills Conference 2026 and GDTE is a high recognition for Malaysia and the country's leadership.

The Prime Minister had the opportunity to voice his stance on the importance of ethical digital technology, fair and free digital trade and shared prosperity through strategic national cooperation.

Anwar also expressed recognition of China's rapid progress in the fields of digital technology and AI as well as its role in sharing technological advances with countries in the Global South.

The bilateral meeting and discussions between the two Malaysian and Chinese delegations at the West Lake State Guest House, Hangzhou, highlighted the level of personal chemistry between Anwar and China Premier Li Qiang.

The close relationship between the two leaders is not a secret. Repeated meetings since Anwar's tenure as the country's leader in November 2022 reflect a high-level of mutual trust that goes beyond formal diplomatic protocols.

This closeness allows complex issues such as supply chains, the implementation of infrastructure projects and regional and international geopolitical stability to be discussed in a frank and relaxed, yet effective manner.

Among the matters discussed during the bilateral meeting was the agreement between Malaysia and China on the proposal to extend the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) project from Kota Bharu to Rantau Panjang, Kelantan, thus providing economic spillover and prosperity to rural areas in Kelantan.

Also given attention was the concerns of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Malaysia regarding foreign market domination that could affect local interests.

"This matter has been raised directly and we have received assurances from the relevant companies, including Alibaba and Li himself, that the best method will be sought so that business dealings do not affect the interests of MSMEs in Malaysia," said Anwar.

This working visit not only maintains China's status as Malaysia's largest trading partner, but also redefines the landscape of cooperation from traditional commodity trade to the digital economy, artificial intelligence and high skills.

China has been Malaysia's largest trading partner for 17 consecutive years, with bilateral trade reaching US$113.82 billion (RM456.68 billion) for the period January to August this year.

The combination of pragmatic MADANI Diplomacy and the close relationship between Anwar and Li puts Malaysia in the best position to maximise economic benefits for the well-being of the people. — Bernama

Negeri Sembilan Undang, disputed chiefs: Conference of Rulers told of Tunku Nadzaruddin’s succession





Negeri Sembilan Undang, disputed chiefs: Conference of Rulers told of Tunku Nadzaruddin’s succession



File picture of Istana Negara. The Negeri Sembilan government has informed the Conference of Rulers that Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar has been selected as the state’s 12th Yang di-Pertuan Besar, according to an Undang and three disputed ruling chiefs. — Bernama pic


Summary

  • The Negeri Sembilan government has informed the Conference of Rulers about Tunku Nadzaruddin's selection as the state's 12th Yang di-Pertuan Besar.
  • The group insists that Tunku Nadzaruddin is the lawful authority under the Negeri Sembilan Constitution to exercise all functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar.
  • There is a dispute with Dewan Keadilan dan Undang, which asserts Tuanku Muhriz is the lawful Yang di-Pertuan Besar and the April 19 proclamation is invalid.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 3:45 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 25 — The Negeri Sembilan government has notified the Conference of Rulers of Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar’s selection as the state’s 12th Yang di-Pertuan Besar, according to an Undang and three ruling chiefs whose positions are disputed.

The group said the notification meant Tunku Nadzaruddin was the only person with lawful authority to perform the functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar under the Negeri Sembilan Constitution 1959, including attending meetings of the Conference of Rulers, The Star reported today.

It also urged the state administration to recognise Tunku Nadzaruddin and provide him with the privileges and entitlements attached to the office.

“The state government administration must comply and remain loyal and must not commit any act of disobedience.


“The state government administration must also immediately accord all privileges and entitlements prescribed for Tunku Nadzaruddin,” they said.

State civil servants, meanwhile, were urged to follow decisions of the executive council and not bow to pressure from any party.

The group said the official notification to the Conference of Rulers reflected its position that Tunku Nadzaruddin was entitled to exercise all the functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar.


“Through the... official notification to the Conference of Rulers, only Tunku Nadzaruddin... has the lawful authority to exercise all functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar under the Negeri Sembilan Constitution 1959, including attending all meetings of the Conference of Rulers,” they said.

The joint statement was issued by Undang of Johol Datuk Muhammed Abdullah, Datuk Mubarak Thahak, Datuk Maarof Mat Rashad and Datuk Abdul Rahim Yasin, whose positions as the Undang of Sungei Ujong, Jelebu and Rembau respectively are disputed.

Tunku Besar Tampin Tunku Syed Razman Syed Idrus Al-Qadri was also a signatory.

The group maintains that Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir was removed as Yang di-Pertuan Besar on April 19, with Tunku Nadzaruddin subsequently chosen as his successor.

The Dewan Keadilan dan Undang disputes that account, maintaining that Tuanku Muhriz remains the lawful Yang di-Pertuan Besar and that the April 19 proclamation was invalid

Don't hide behind excuses, explain why you signed proclamation, ex-N Sembilan MB tells Ismail








Don't hide behind excuses, explain why you signed proclamation, ex-N Sembilan MB tells Ismail

Published: Sep 25, 2026 1:35 PM


Former Negeri Sembilan menteri besar Aminuddin Harun has told his successor, Ismail Lasim, not to blame the previous administration for the ongoing state royal imbroglio and urged him to explain why he signed the controversial proclamation to install a new ruler.

Aminuddin (above, right) said he had no problem with his record as menteri besar being scrutinised, but Ismail should specify what alleged wrongdoing the previous state government committed.

“Don’t just use the term ‘previous government’ as a general answer. If there was wrongdoing, state what it was. If there was a breach of the law, state the provision.

“In a matter this serious, the people have a right to clear and verifiable facts,” he said in a statement today.


Yesterday, Ismail (above, left) brushed aside questions about his shifting loyalties to the state ruler and his claim that he was forced to sign a document affirming the state’s disputed territorial chieftains' (Undang Yang Empat) move to dethrone Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir (below).


On Aug 3, a day after being sworn in as menteri besar, Ismail met with the chieftains and rival claimant to the throne, Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar.

During that meeting, he signed a document affirming the territorial chieftain's proclamation on April 19 dethroning Tuanku Muhriz.

When the matter was made public on Sept 6, Ismail distanced himself from the document and pledged loyalty to Tuanku Muhriz.


READ MORE: MB 'forced' to sign order against Tuanku Muhriz, but doesn’t say why he met rebel undangs


'I refused to sign same document'

Commenting further, Aminuddin said that on April 20, while he was still menteri besar, he was presented with a proclamation dated April 19 for his signature, with reference to the process under Article 10 of the Negeri Sembilan Constitution.


He said he decided not to sign it as he had serious concerns about the process, including whether the requirements under Article 10 had been fully complied with.

Aminuddin added that his position was based on legal advice that a menteri besar should not sign a document with such significant implications for the institution of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar when questions over the process and its validity are unresolved.


“If I, during my tenure as menteri besar, could decide not to sign the document due to doubts regarding the process, how is it that the signature of the menteri besar who succeeded me appears on that same document?” he asked.

He noted that Ismail had acknowledged the signature as his own but later claimed that he had signed the document under duress. The menteri besar later lodged a police report on the matter.

Aminuddin also pointed to the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ Sept 17 statement, which said that the April 19 proclamation was invalid because the mandatory requirements under Article 10 had not been complied with.

READ MORE: AGC: N Sembilan MB, state exco's decision on Tuanku Muhriz invalid

At the same time, he acknowledged that the Undang Yang Empat secretariat had disputed this position, maintaining that the inquiries conducted on March 5 and April 19 had fulfilled the requirements of Article 10 of the state constitution.

“The difference in interpretation itself shows that compliance with Article 10 is a substantive issue and not something that can be simplified by blaming only one party,” he said.

‘What changed in early September?’

Separately, former minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz also questioned the sequence of events surrounding Ismail’s signing of the proclamation and his subsequent position on the matter.

In a statement yesterday, Zafrul said that Ismail took his oath as menteri besar before Tuanku Muhriz on Aug 2 and signed the proclamation concerning the ruler’s removal the following day.


Yet on Sept 6, more than a month after signing the document, Ismail still publicly expressed full support and loyalty to Tuanku Muhriz as Yang di-Pertuan Besar, Zafrul added.

Three days later, Ismail lodged a police report saying he unwillingly signed the proclamation to remove Tuanku Muhriz and under duress, while the state government maintained that the proclamation did not comply with the prescribed process and procedures.

On Sept 15, Ismail maintained that a proclamation did not, by itself, create the constitutional power required to remove the ruler and that questions over its source of authority, conditions, and procedures needed to be determined.

However, the state executive council, chaired by Ismail, unanimously decided on the same day that the proclamation was valid and in force.

The decision to remove Tuanku Muhriz as Yang di-Pertuan Besar was announced on Sept 16, while Ismail again confirmed the exco decision the next day and directed that the gazettement process proceed.

READ MORE: KINIGUIDE | Negeri Sembilan royal rumble: What's going on?

Therefore, Zafrul called upon Ismail to explain what had changed between Sept 9 and 15.

Among the questions he raised were whether Ismail was indeed forced to sign the proclamation on Aug 3, who allegedly forced him, what prompted the change in position between Sept 9 and Sept 15, and whether he had also been pressured into changing his position.

“If there was pressure to change your position, who was involved and who did you meet during that period?” Zafrul asked.


Najib’s bank accounts frozen, cannot afford RM50m fine, says lawyer






Najib’s bank accounts frozen, cannot afford RM50m fine, says lawyer



Datuk Seri Najib Razak waves to members of the media at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur, September 25, 2026. Najib cannot afford the RM50 million fine imposed as a condition for him to serve the remainder of his SRC International prison sentence under house arrest, his lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah said today. — Bernama pic


Summary

  • Najib Razak cannot afford the RM50 million fine needed to serve his prison sentence under house arrest, as his bank accounts are frozen.
  • Najib's legal team has not received the official letter detailing the terms of his conditional pardon from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
  • The delay in receiving the pardon's official document is hindering Najib's legal team's ability to plan their next steps.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 12:14 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 25 — Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak cannot afford the RM50 million fine imposed as a condition for him to serve the remainder of his SRC International prison sentence under house arrest, his lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah said today.

Shafee said Najib did not have the financial means to settle the fine and that his bank accounts had been frozen, including an Affin Bank account he had previously used to receive his salary as prime minister and Member of Parliament, Berita Harian reported today.

Shafee said Najib was in a difficult position as he was required to pay the fine as one of the conditions of his pardon but did not have the means to do so.

“He is in a dilemma because he is supposed to pay it, but he does not have the money,” he said, adding that he did not know how much had been raised in contributions.

Separately, Shafee said Najib had yet to receive the official letter on the conditional pardon granted by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, which allows him to serve the remainder of his SRC International sentence under house arrest.


He said the legal team had also not received the document setting out the conditions of the pardon.

“The Yang di-Pertuan Agong has made the decision under his prerogative, but the most important person is Datuk Seri Najib because he is the one who was sentenced to prison and house arrest, yet until today he has not received the letter.

“We do not know why the letter is taking so long. Even the Prisons Department has not received it,” he said, noting that today marked the eighth day since Najib was granted the conditional pardon.

Shafee said the delay was affecting the legal team’s next steps because they did not know the full conditions contained in the official document.

“Eight days. It is strange. This delay is affecting the legal team’s next course of action because we do not know the full conditions contained in the official document,” he said.

Bandar Utama school stabbing: Family plans civil suit as mother asks if tragedy could have been prevented






Bandar Utama school stabbing: Family plans civil suit as mother asks if tragedy could have been prevented



Wong Lee Ping, the mother of 16-year-old student Yap Shing Xuen, who was fatally stabbed at a Bandar Utama school last year, speaks to reporters in Kepong on September 25, 2026, as the family announced plans to pursue a civil suit. — Picture by Raymond Manuel


Summary

  • Nearly a year after the tragic school stabbing of her 16-year-old daughter, Wong Lee Ping continues to seek answers about whether the incident could have been prevented.
  • Following the Shah Alam High Court's acquittal of the accused on grounds of unsound mind, the family plans to file a civil suit while the case moves to the appeal stage.
  • Wong emphasizes the need for awareness and preventive measures in schools to protect children, expressing a deep sense of loss and gratitude for public support.
  • The family's legal actions aim to address potential oversight and prevent future tragedies.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 1:47 PM MYT
Last Modified: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 1:52 PM MYT


KEPONG, Sept 25 — More than 11 months after her daughter was fatally stabbed at school, Wong Lee Ping is still asking a question she cannot put behind her: could the tragedy have been prevented?

The mother of 16-year-old Yap Shing Xuen said the family is planning to pursue a civil suit as the criminal case moves to the appeal stage following the Shah Alam High Court’s decision to acquit the teenage accused on the grounds of unsoundness of mind.

“Our lawyers will be filing a civil suit. Until the criminal proceedings are completed, we will not comment on the details. Our lawyers will explain those matters later,” Wong told a press conference today.

Asked whether the civil action would be filed after the appeal or concurrently, Wong said the family intended to proceed but had yet to determine when.


She also confirmed that the family was considering legal action against certain parties, but declined to identify them, saying the matter would be reviewed in due course.


For Wong, however, the civil action is not simply another legal avenue. Her daughter, she said, is not coming home.

“I am not here today to seek resolution in the criminal case, because my daughter is already gone.


“No matter what we do today, I will never be able to hear her call me again. I will never be able to call her home again,” she said, breaking down in tears.


‘Were the warning signs seen?’

Wong said she remained troubled by what might have happened before the stabbing.

“If there were already some warning signs before the tragedy happened, were those warning signs seen?

“And if they were seen, did anyone actually take sufficient action?” she said.

Wong said she was not asking schools to guarantee that tragedies would never happen.

“But I hope that whenever a child shows warning signs of danger, we don’t wait until another child loses their life before regretting it and asking why nobody stopped it, why nobody could stop it.

“My daughter does not have a second chance,” she said.

Wong said she hoped her daughter’s death could instead give other children a better chance of being protected.

“That is why I am continuing to stand here and speak today,” she said.

She also questioned whether warning signs had been missed during the accused teenager’s first two weeks at the school.

“For two weeks the student brought a knife to school, why didn’t anyone notice this? I think it is very possible that other students knew.

“Why didn’t the school teachers tell the children that if they noticed anything dangerous, or if someone brought a knife or something like that to school, they should tell a teacher?” she said.

Wong’s husband, How Boon Chin, who was also at the press conference, stressed the importance of measures to prevent similar incidents in schools.

“School is supposed to be a very safe place,” he said.



Wong Lee Ping and How Boon Chin, the parents of 16-year-old student Yap Shing Xuen, who was fatally stabbed at a Bandar Utama school last year, stand alongside Kepong MP Lim Lip Eng (2nd left) and supporters during a press conference at the Kepong MP Service Centre in Kuala Lumpur on September 25, 2026. — Picture by Raymond Manuel


From murder charge to appeal


Yap Shing Xuen was fatally stabbed at a secondary school in Bandar Utama on October 14 last year.

The teenager accused of killing her, who was 14 at the time, was charged with murder at the Petaling Jaya Magistrates’ Court on October 22.

The case subsequently went through psychiatric assessment before being transferred to the Shah Alam High Court, where the trial was conducted in camera because the accused was a minor.

A psychiatric assessment found him fit to stand trial in January. He pleaded not guilty when the murder charge was read again at the High Court on February 12.

The trial began on August 3.

On August 13, the High Court ordered the teenager to enter his defence after finding that the prosecution had established a prima facie case.

The defence closed its case on August 26 after two witnesses — the accused and a forensic psychiatrist — testified.

On September 14, High Court Judge Adlin Abdul Majid acquitted and discharged the teenager after finding that he was of unsound mind at the time of the offence, and ordered him to be placed at Hospital Bahagia Ulu Kinta for a period to be approved by the Sultan of Selangor.

The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) filed a Notice of Appeal at the Court of Appeal on September 22, challenging the acquittal.


Appeal puts High Court ruling under fresh scrutiny

Kepong DAP MP Lim Lip Eng, whose office offered legal assistance to the family, said the AGC’s decision to appeal showed that prosecutors were challenging the High Court’s ruling.

“And to answer a few questions from the reporters whether we or the family members agree with the judgment, I think the government has answered. The government disagrees with the judgment, hence the appeal,” he said.

Wong said the family was moved by the decision to appeal.

“When I heard that the AGC was appealing, I was actually very touched because I felt that someone was supporting me,” she said.

She said the family would now wait for the appeal process rather than attempt to intervene in matters outside its control.

Wong also said the family had not had the opportunity to access certain documentary evidence, including government documents and the medical report.

She therefore declined to comment on some aspects of the case while the appeal was pending, saying the Court of Appeal should make its decision based on the complete evidence.

Asked whether the family was willing to meet the accused again, Wong said she had no intention of doing so.

“I don’t think I will meet him again, there is no need for that,” she said.

‘It feels like it happened only the day before yesterday’

The passage of almost a year has not made the loss feel distant for Wong.

She said she had struggled to return to work after her daughter’s death, continuing only because her team was still there.

“We reduced our workload. We worked more slowly and did less,” she said.

“It feels as though this happened only the day before yesterday.”

For much of the past year, she said, she simply wanted to rest and not think about anything.

“Just eat and sleep. The year passed like that,” she added.

Wong said she had spent the year carrying out Buddhist prayers and rituals for Shing Xuen, including ceremonies marking the 49th and 100th days after her death.

She also arranged for 20,000 copies of Buddhist scriptures to be printed and distributed to temples.

But Wong said the family had to be careful about how much of the case they discussed with her other daughter.

“There are many things that I don’t talk to her about too much because it would disturb her life and affect her, and it would also affect me,” Wong said.

“Because in our current situation, it feels like a second trauma for us.

“So I try to avoid exposing her to these things. I only discuss important matters with her. Other things, I don’t tell her too much.”

Wong said she was grateful for the public support the family had received throughout the case.

“The public has really shown us a lot of care and support. I am really touched. I thank everyone and am grateful that people have shown us this support,” she said.

How said the family would hold a separate press conference on the civil suit once more details were available.

Najib’s family still awaiting house arrest SOP, says daughter






Najib’s family still awaiting house arrest SOP, says daughter



File picture of Datuk Seri Najib Razak with daughter his Nooryana Najwa at the Kuala Lumpur High Court in Kuala Lumpur August 9, 2019. Nooryana said neither the family nor his lawyers had received details from the Prisons Department, including on any modifications needed to the residence for the house arrest arrangement. — Picture by Firdaus Latif


Summary

  • Najib Razak's family has not received any official details or SOP from the Prisons Department about his house arrest, leaving them unsure of the requirements.
  • Najib's Langgak Duta residence, empty since his imprisonment, is designated for house arrest, pending official guidelines and modifications.
  • A fundraising campaign by Umno for Najib has raised over RM2 million, reflecting public and party support for his conditional house arrest arrangement.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 9:00 AM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 25 — The family of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has yet to receive any official information, including standard operating procedures (SOP), from the authorities on the implementation of his house arrest.

Nooryana Najwa, one of Najib’s daughters, said neither the family nor his lawyers had received details from the Prisons Department, including on any modifications needed to the residence for the house arrest arrangement, according to a report by Berita Harian.

“We have not received any SOP from the Prisons Department. Simply put, we have not received any official information. Our lawyers have also not received any official information. So we are still waiting for information from the Prisons Department,” she said.

“We really do not know. As family members, we have not received any word or information from prison officers,” she said.


Media had previously reported that Najib was expected to serve the remainder of his sentence at his residence in Langgak Duta here, under Prisons Department supervision, with restrictions including limited family visits.

His lawyer Datuk Hasnal Rezua Merican had said the location was chosen because no family members lived there, allowing the property to be used as a prison facility, subject to criteria set by the Prisons director-general.

Nooryana said the Langgak Duta residence had been vacant since her father was imprisoned on August 23, 2022.


“My mother (Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor) lives with me. So the house has been empty since (Najib) was imprisoned,” she said.

Najib is currently serving his sentence at Kajang Prison following a conditional pardon granted by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim on September 18, allowing him to serve the remainder of his sentence for the SRC International case under house arrest until August 23, 2028, subject to the conditions imposed, including payment of a RM50 million fine.

However, as of today, the eighth day since the decision, there has been no new development from Kajang Prison.

On the fundraising campaign launched by Umno, Nooryana said she had been informed that total contributions had so far reached more than RM2 million.

“I understand that Umno members are not concentrated in the cities, so it is quite difficult for us to reach the fundraising target within a short period.

“So, Umno’s effort at the moment is to bring the fund to programmes in rural areas each time to raise more contributions,” she said.

Nooryana said the family welcomed the decision on the conditional house arrest after waiting for some time for developments concerning Najib’s situation.

“At the time of the decision, my mother was with me. We were happy because at least there was a decision. There was a way out for my father.

“Although the opportunity is rather complicated for the family, we know what needs to be done,” she said.

However, she said the family was still waiting for several matters to be finalised before commenting further on the implementation of the house arrest.

“Because right now we are still waiting. There has been no final decision. So I cannot comment beyond that.

“I know there is a lot of speculation out there and so on. If we are to make a decision, we will make it based on accurate information from the authorities,” she said.

Nooryana also said the family was touched by the support shown by Umno and members of the public who had contributed towards efforts to secure Najib’s release through the house arrest arrangement.

“We were very touched when Umno announced that it would launch a solidarity fund for Datuk Seri Najib. Likewise, we appreciate the efforts of members of the public who are willing to contribute.

“We are relieved because there is finally a way out. It gives the family hope, although we understand that its implementation remains subject to the conditions set,” she said.

PDRM tightens security at Wisma Negeri following exco revocation






PDRM tightens security at Wisma Negeri following exco revocation



Negeri Sembilan Police Chief Datuk Alzafny Ahmad speaks to the media at the Port Dickson District Administrative Complex in Port Dickson on July 18, 2026. — Bernama pic


Summary

  • The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) in Negeri Sembilan emphasizes maintaining public safety and order amid current state developments.
  • In response to the cancellation of appointments by the Negeri Sembilan Palace, PDRM executed access management at the Wisma Negeri Office to ensure smooth operations.
  • Police deployment at key locations aims to uphold public safety while avoiding disruptions.
  • The police assure impartiality in handling any legal and constitutional matters and remain committed to enforcing the law without bias.


First Published: Friday, 25 Sep 2026 8:40 AM MYT


SEREMBAN, Sept 25 — The Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM), particularly the Negeri Sembilan police contingent, continues to prioritise public safety and order in light of current developments in the state.

Negeri Sembilan police chief Datuk Alzafny Ahmad said that the PDRM acknowledges the statement from the Attorney General’s Chambers regarding the proclamation dated April 19 and respects the ongoing constitutional and legal processes without making any determinations beyond its jurisdiction.

“PDRM has implemented access management to the Wisma Negeri Office for the former line-up of Negeri Sembilan State Executive Council (MMKN) members immediately following the announcement of the cancellation of their appointments made by the Negeri Sembilan Palace.

“This action is to ensure that the aspects of safety, public order, and smooth operations at the premises are continuously maintained,” he said in a statement here yesterday.


Alzafny also explained that the deployment of police at several locations, including the Tuanku Ja’afar Royal Gallery, the Luak Sungei Ujong Hall, and the State Secretariat yesterday, was to maintain public safety.

He said that any access control at the relevant location is implemented in a controlled manner based on the current security assessment and the premises management requirements, in addition to avoiding any situation that could cause tension or disrupt public order.

He said that the action should not be interpreted as the PDRM favouring or recognising any party in matters that are undergoing constitutional and legal processes.


“As an agency responsible for maintaining peace and enforcing the law, the PDRM will continue to carry out its duties professionally, fairly, and based on the law without favouring any party,” he also said.

He added that the PDRM will not compromise on any actions that violate the law, provoke, disturb public order, or threaten the safety of any individual and institution. — Bernama

A Perfect Storm – Something Else Causing Bond Market Havoc





A Perfect Storm – Something Else Causing Bond Market Havoc


September 24th, 2026 by financetwitter



In a rare move, Donald Trump personally welcomed Xi Jinping’s entourage at Andrews Air Force Base as the U.S. Air Force band marched on the tarmac and U.S. and Chinese flags flew. The last American president to welcome a foreign leader at Andrews John F. Kennedy in 1962, although Trump welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin off his plane in Alaska last year.

After officials literally rolled out the 100ft (30m) red carpet, Trump and First Lady Melania shook hands with Xi and his wife Peng Liyuan once the Chinese president descended from his plane at Joint Base Andrews, a US military airfield outside Washington. Trump, wearing a long coat and gloves, and Xi then stood side by side on the tarmac as a military band played national anthems.


Ahead of Xi’s arrival, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the U.S. and China will extend their trade truce, which was set to expire 10 November 2026 to January 2027. Even though the three-day summit is expected to be more about spectacle than substance, it shows desperation on the American side to smooth tensions on everything from AI (Artificial Intelligence) and trade to Iran.


The unusual ceremony at the airport demonstrated how much the U.S. leader is seeking to impress his counterpart. In a normal protocol, Trump would wait for Xi to drive up to the White House. In comparison, Chinese President Xi Jinping did not receive U.S. President Donald Trump as he arrived at Beijing International Airport on May 13. Chinese Vice President Han Zheng was there instead.

It’s not hard to understand why Trump has made it clear he wants to wow Xi, and has very interest in flexing muscles. He has enough on his plate to pick up another round of fights with China. A perfect storm is forming in the financial market – selloff in the U.S. bond market, fighting words from an Iranian official at the U.N., hawkish comments from a Federal Reserve governor and a weak auction of government bonds.


The 10-year Treasury yield closed at 5.113% on Wednesday (September 23), blowing past the recent highs at levels unseen since 2007. The 30-year U.S. Treasury yield has topped 5.43%, putting it on track for its highest close since 2004. Borrowing costs are surging in Asia and continue to rise in Europe. Oil prices are rising, with the most actively traded Brent contract, for December delivery, trading right around US$100 a barrel.


From an intractable conflict in Iran to a seemingly indestructible U.S. economy, it just “doesn’t make sense to a lot of people to own bonds here,” – said Christopher Sullivan, chief investment officer at the United Nations Federal Credit Union. Even Japan’s 10-year bond yield jumps to highest since August 1996.

Government bond yields, which rise when bond prices fall, have been climbing for months, and their rise is already rippling throughout the economy, impacting everything from mortgage and credit card rates to private-equity firms’ willingness to make debt-fueled acquisitions. At the same time, the uptick in yields still doesn’t seem like it has done enough to broadly slow the economy.

That has only caused yields to rise further, as investors bet that the Fed will have to raise rates even higher than previously anticipated to have any real success in bringing down inflation. Investors now see a 73% chance that the Fed will lift interest rates again next month, according to CME Group data – up from 55% last week and 11% last month.


Looking further out, investors expect hikes to keep coming. Traders see a roughly 50% chance that interest rates will be at least one full percentage point higher around this time next year – a scenario that was barely on their radars just a month ago, thanks to strong economic data, higher oil prices and comments from a Fed governor backing further rate increases.



The bad news for bonds started early on Wednesday, when oil prices spiked in European trading. Traders who had hoped for U.S.-Iran diplomacy during the ongoing United Nations General Assembly in New York were less than thrilled with comments from Iran’s president, who said his country won’t fully open the Strait of Hormuz as long as sanctions remain in place.

The U.S. 10-year yield drifted higher early. Then, at 9:45 a.m. in New York, a monthly business survey that is rarely known for moving markets turned heads. Izaac Brook, U.S. rates strategist at RBC Capital Markets, was on a plane about to leave from New York to Minnesota when the headlines broke about the survey, known as the S&P Global Flash U.S. Composite PMI.


The report, based on a survey of services and manufacturing firms, showed businesses growing at the quickest pace in more than five years and the fastest job growth in more than four years. Brook got a quick glimpse of the market’s reaction – a sharp jump in yields on short and longer-duration bonds – before turning his phone onto airplane mode.

When he arrived at his destination a few hours later, the strategist said he had “a million” messages from people asking what was happening. “It just is so hard for people to be constructive right now,” – Brook said. “You can look at the levels and say these are really attractive. But we’ve been playing that game for the past six months, and every time we’ve tried to draw a line in the sand somewhere, it just keeps going.”

The Fed last week raised interest rates for the first time in three years, and the market is anticipating further hikes. That sentiment got further fuel just after 10 a.m. when remarks by Fed governor Michael Barr hit the newswires. “Inflation is above our 2% target and not clearly trending toward target in a timely way,” Barr said in a speech in Chicago.




He noted that risks that could prevent the Fed from achieving its inflation target have risen. The concern among investors is that “the Fed is willing to hike to constrain inflation despite a lot of the pressures coming from supply shocks, which could mean unrelenting hawkishness,” said Dhiraj Narula, U.S. rates strategist at HSBC.

Meanwhile, traders were waiting for the Treasury Department to announce the size of its planned bond buyback operation set for Thursday. That announcement came – US$6 billion – but had little effect on the selloff. Then at 1 p.m., the federal government’s auction of fresh 5-year Treasury notes was met with weak demand.

The notes were sold at a yield well above what traders had anticipated, and bond dealers that are required to bid at auctions were forced to take down an unusually large share, pointing to a lack of interest from other potential buyers. Investors had little interest in buying bonds right when their prices were tumbling. The poor result only caused more alarm, driving yields still higher.


All in, it was the worst day in nearly 18 months for U.S. government bonds. Major stock indexes also slipped, but not as far as some traders might have expected on a day when debt benchmarks that affect rates on everything from corporate bonds to mortgages soared.

Few are denying those were contributing factors. But there was also something else behind the scenes, according to market watchers – traders being forced out of their positions. “The move has the hallmarks of a pain trade and forced selling by investors at these more elevated levels and could have further to run,” – said MUFG Bank’s Derek Halpenny in a note today.



Mohit Kumar, chief European economist at Jefferies, had the same assessment – “The main driver was likely stop outs and position unwinds. There appears to be a lot of pain on the street in fixed income.” In recent weeks, many traders had been making a popular fixed-income bet known as a “steepener”, betting that the gap between short- and long-dated bond yields would widen.


Instead, that gap has narrowed as traders have rapidly adjusted their interest-rate expectations. Active traders “either had steepeners or outright longs at the front end of the curve. Some of the positions had been cleared in the last two weeks, but yesterday saw another round of washouts,” – Kumar said. A new round of U.S.-China tariff war would push up inflation even higher.

From one U-turn to another, Ismail now going round in circles





From one U-turn to another, Ismail now going round in circles


Ismail now says the state government has never sought to remove Tuanku Muhriz and has no authority to determine who occupies the throne


Updated 2 hours ago · Published on 24 Sep 2026 6:20PM


Ismail cannot simply point to adat and the Constitution and leave unanswered the actions taken by the administration he leads. - September 24, 2026



by The Vibes Says




NEGERI Sembilan Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Ismail Lasim is facing increasingly difficult questions over his handling of the dispute surrounding Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, as his latest statement appears to depart sharply from positions taken by his own administration over the past three weeks.


Ismail now says the state government has never sought to remove Tuanku Muhriz and has no authority to determine who occupies the throne.

But that assertion sits uneasily with the record.

In early Sept, shortly after the disputed proclamation was made public, Ismail reaffirmed the state government’s full support and loyalty to Tuanku Muhriz as the Yang di-Pertuan Besar.

Days later, he said he had signed the instrument seeking Tuanku Muhriz’s removal unwillingly and under duress.

He lodged a police report and described the document as invalid, unconstitutional and unenforceable, while again declaring Tuanku Muhriz the only legitimate ruler of Negeri Sembilan.

Yet the position changed dramatically within days.




The state executive council, chaired by Ismail, subsequently declared the April 19 proclamation valid and said Tuanku Muhriz’s removal was legitimate.

It recognised Tuanku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja’afar as the new Yang di-Pertuan Besar and said the state government would take immediate steps to implement the decision.

Ismail later confirmed that the Exco had reached the decision unanimously.

That is difficult to square with today’s claim that the state government had never sought to remove Tuanku Muhriz.

The issue is not simply whether the proclamation was ultimately valid.

That question is now also the subject of competing constitutional and customary interpretations, including the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ position that the Menteri Besar and Exco had no unilateral power to remove the Yang di-Pertuan Besar.

The more immediate political question is why the position of the state government, under Ismail’s leadership, has shifted so markedly.

The DKU has also put the spotlight on the role of Ismail’s predecessor, Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun, saying he refused to sign the April proclamation because the requirements under Article 10 of the state Constitution had not been fulfilled.




That account matters because it undermines any attempt to suggest that the controversy can simply be traced to the previous administration.

Whatever may have happened in April, it was Ismail who became Menteri Besar, and whose signature appeared on the later instrument, and Ismail who chaired the Exco meeting that declared the proclamation valid and backed its implementation.

Now, after the Attorney-General’s Chambers rejected the premise that the MB and Exco could unilaterally act against the ruler, Ismail is presenting his administration as an outsider to the dispute — one that merely wants the customary institutions to resolve the matter.

That raises an obvious question: where was that restraint when the Exco was declaring the removal valid and recognising a new ruler?

For a Menteri Besar at the centre of a constitutional and customary crisis, changing explanations are not a minor matter. They go directly to political responsibility.

Ismail cannot simply point to adat and the Constitution and leave unanswered the actions taken by the administration he leads.

Nor can invoking Aminuddin’s earlier role explain away decisions subsequently made under Ismail’s chairmanship.

The chronology is now difficult to ignore: allegiance to Tuanku Muhriz, an admission of signing the removal instrument under duress, an Exco decision endorsing the removal, recognition of a successor, and now a declaration that the state government never sought to remove the ruler.

Each position has come from the same administration.

That leaves Ismail with a credibility problem of his own making.

At a time when Negeri Sembilan’s institutions are already under extraordinary strain, the public deserves something more than another change in position.

It deserves a clear account of what the Menteri Besar knew, what he signed, what his Exco decided and why the government’s position has shifted so dramatically.

Until those questions are answered, Ismail’s latest attempt to distance the state government from the removal process is unlikely to settle the controversy. If anything, it adds another layer to it. – September 24, 2026


***


The Dud has been ceaselessly banging his own head with his preeeeggg, wakakaka, hence he is going around in circles.


Tuanku Muhriz's sacking of 10 N Sembilan excos gazetted








Tuanku Muhriz's sacking of 10 N Sembilan excos gazetted


Published: Sep 24, 2026 9:48 PM


The Negeri Sembilan government has gazetted state ruler Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir’s revocation of the appointments of 10 state excos who violated their oath of allegiance to the Yang di-Pertuan Besar.


According to the gazette dated today, the executive councillors’ positions were revoked effective Sept 20.

“According to Article 38(5) of the Negeri Sembilan constitution, state exco members, except for the menteri besar, hold their posts with the consent of the ruler.

“Since the 10 have violated their pledge of loyalty to the ruler, their appointments as members of the state exco have been revoked and annulled,” the gazette stated.


The 10 assemblypersons involved include seven from Umno, namely Mustapha Nagoor (Palong), Faizal Ramli (Linggi), Zaiful Bahri Idris (Chembong), Razi Ali (Sungai Lui), Asna Amin (Lenggeng), Siti Nur Umaira Hasim (Labu) and Suhaimizan Bizar (Gemencheh).

The others are MCA’s Siow Kong Choon (Chennah), PAS’ Fairuz Isa (Serting), and Razali Abu Samah (Sikamat) of Wawasan Negara.



Besides the now-former excos, Umno still has nine assemblypersons while MCA has one next to PAS’ three and Wawasan’s two.

Clash of heads


Earlier today, Menteri Besar Ismail Lasim insisted that the state exco line-up remains intact, crying foul over how councillors have been allegedly barred from entering their offices at Wisma Negeri and prevented from carrying out their duties.

READ MORE: 'Overtaken by events' - MB dodges shifting loyalty, 'forced to sign' posers

Ismail had also publicly disagreed with Tuanku Muhriz’s Sept 20 request for him to present a new set of exco members to the state ruler.


The Juasseh assemblyperson argued that the ruler’s move was not legally valid as contrary to the requirements of the state constitution; he had not advised for the excos’ removal as he was never consulted prior to the royal decision.

Ismail had also confirmed that a Sept 22 meeting of the state executive council had agreed to suspend secretary Zafir Ibrahim and state legal adviser Muzalmah Mustapha Kamal.

However, Chief Secretary to the Government Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar and the Attorney-General’s Chambers rejected the move, with both authorities instructing their respective personnel to continue their tasks as usual.

Hundreds protest for return of Machado to Venezuela

 


Hundreds protest for return of Machado to Venezuela

Hundreds protest for return of Machado to Venezuela

The exiled opposition figure and Nobel Peace Prize laureate was blocked from entering the country on Tuesday after another attempt to return home.

People demonstrate in Caracas demanding the return of Maria Corina Machado to Venezuela. (EPA Images pic)
CARACAS:
Hundreds of protesters demanded the return of exiled opposition figure and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Corina Machado to Venezuela, AFP observed at a demonstration in Caracas on Thursday.

“Maria Corina, come, we’re waiting for you!” the crowd chanted, marching under an enormous Venezuelan flag.

Machado was blocked from entering the country on Tuesday after yet another attempt to return home, sources from her political party told AFP.

That same day, Venezuela’s interim leader Delcy Rodriguez met with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Protester Douglas Mata, 65, questioned why Machado had been prevented from coming home.

“It’s not possible that they receive Delcy Rodriguez like a queen in the United States, yet they won’t let Maria Corina enter her own country,” he said.

Rodriguez took over from president Nicolas Maduro after his ouster by US forces in January, and has effectively governed under Washington’s thumb since then.

The White House denies allegations that Trump has vetoed Machado’s return to Venezuela.

The opposition figure came out of hiding in December, when she traveled to Norway to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.

After a brief stint in the US, she settled in Panama City, where she now lives in exile.