Saturday, November 22, 2025

Hamzah to stay on as opposition leader: Muhyiddin





PN chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has confirmed that Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainuddin will continue to serve as the leader of the opposition. - Scoop gfx, November 21, 2025


Hamzah to stay on as opposition leader: Muhyiddin



Perikatan Nasional chairman dismisses rumours of leadership change, reaffirming Hamzah's position as opposition leader



A. Azim Idris
Updated 7 seconds ago
21 November, 2025
9:02 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR – PN chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has confirmed that Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainuddin will continue to serve as the leader of the opposition.

Speaking to the media while campaigning for PN candidates in Pantai Dalit, Tuaran, in Sabah this afternoon, Muhyiddin said that no changes to the opposition leadership had been decided, local media reported.

His remarks came in response to circulating rumours suggesting that Bersatu vice-president Datuk Radzi Jidin was set to take over the opposition leader role.

“There’s nothing. No change (to the opposition leader). Everything remains as it is,” he said succinctly.

Speculation had emerged in recent days that Radzi might replace Hamzah, following reports linking Hamzah to attempts to destabilise Muhyiddin’s leadership.

However, a video shared by Bersatu leaders earlier showed 18 MPs meeting at Muhyiddin’s residence, with Hamzah later publicly reaffirming his support for the PN Chairman.

In a subsequent Facebook post, Muhyiddin emphasised that the discussion had been conducted transparently and responsibly. He also reiterated their shared commitment to fulfilling the people’s trust, ensuring discipline, and upholding the party’s integrity through principled and consistent actions. – November 21, 2025

Despite Gaza ceasefire, ‘we haven’t seen the worst’: B’Tselem chief


al Jazeera:

Despite Gaza ceasefire, ‘we haven’t seen the worst’: B’Tselem chief


The conditions that led to genocide in Gaza have remained precarious due to a lack of accountability, says rights advocate Yuli Novak


Displaced Palestinians live in tents in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of Gaza City on November 17 [File: Khames Alrefi/Anadolu Agency]



By Ali Harb
Published On 21 Nov 2025


Washington, DC – Yuli Novak, the executive director of the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, has a warning for politicians in the United States and across the world: The situation in Israel-Palestine is “disastrous”.

Despite the US-brokered ceasefire that scaled back the Israeli attacks in Gaza, Novak told Al Jazeera this week that the conditions are more dangerous than ever.


Recommended Stories



“Our warning is that we haven’t seen the worst,” she said, stressing that Israel must be held accountable for its abuses in Gaza.

Over the past two years, numerous human rights groups have released reports accusing Israel of carrying out a genocide in Gaza — a campaign to destroy the Palestinian people.

United Nations investigators, for instance, determined that Israel’s actions in the territory matched the definition of genocide under international law.

But B’Tselem provided another layer of analysis with its landmark report, called Our Genocide, in July.

It dissected the decades-long history of Israeli policies that laid the groundwork for the carnage in Gaza, including the apartheid system, demographic engineering, the systemic dehumanisation of Palestinians, and a culture of impunity for abuses.

Those conditions, Novak said, have been further entrenched since the war began.

“As long as these things are still in place, we are very concerned that the violence that we’ve seen is not over,” she said.

B’Tselem executive director Yuli Novak and field research director Kareem Jubran speak to Al Jazeera in Washington, DC, on November 20 [Ali Harb/Al Jazeera]


Killings continue

Since the ceasefire started, Israel has killed at least 360 Palestinians in Gaza, including 32 in a wave of air strikes across the territory earlier this week.

The Israeli government has also continued to impose restrictions on humanitarian aid to the enclave, including on temporary shelters needed to replace tents for tens of thousands of Palestinians who faced flooding earlier this month.

Israel’s war on Gaza has killed more than 69,000 Palestinians and turned most of Gaza into rubble.

In the occupied West Bank, conditions have been worsening, with intensifying settlement expansion and deadly Israeli military raids.

On Thursday, Human Rights Watch released a report documenting that Israeli forces forcibly displaced 32,000 Palestinians from their homes in Jenin, Tulkarem and Nur Shams.

Israeli settlers have also increased their attacks, regularly descending on Palestinian villages to torch homes and vehicles and at times kill civilians — often with the protection of the Israeli military.

Novak stressed that settler attacks are a form of Israeli state violence.

“They are Israeli civilians living in the West Bank being armed by the state. Sometimes, many of them wear [army] uniforms. Sometimes these are soldiers on reserve duty that are on a break,” she said.

Some Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have condemned settler violence, but Novak dismissed the move as a ploy to blame Israel’s policies on a “small group of crazy settlers”.

Novak also highlighted that most of the killing and destruction in the West Bank is carried out by official Israeli forces, not settlers. “So this is another arm of the violence that Israel inflicts on Palestinians,” she said.


Meeting US lawmakers

Novak and her B’Tselem colleague Kareem Jubran have been in Washington, DC, this week, where they met with US lawmakers, including Democratic Senators Peter Welch, Jeff Merkley and Chris Van Hollen, as well as Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib.

Novak said the group wants to stress the need for accountability for the genocide in Gaza.

“We are talking about a governing system, the Israeli system, that conducted genocide for two years — war crimes on a daily basis — and got away with it with no accountability,” she said.

“The current situation is probably the most dangerous that we’ve ever been in because not only this violence and this criminality took place, it was also normalised, and in any moment, it can start again, go back to the same scale.”

US President Donald Trump has falsely claimed that there is peace in the Middle East for the first time in 3,000 years because of the truce he helped broker in Gaza.

And earlier this week, the United Nations Security Council passed a resolution backing the US president’s 20-point plan for Gaza, which calls for an end to the fighting, gradual Israeli withdrawal and the deployment of an international force to the territory.

The plan would also see Hamas disarm and Gaza’s governance handed over to an international commission, dubbed “the Board of Peace”.

It has no accountability or compensation mechanism for the horrors that Israel unleashed on Gaza for two years.

Novak said Trump’s plan is disconnected from the reality on the ground.

“It just allows everybody to move on, instead of dealing with the situation and demanding Israel not only to be held accountable but also stop this kind of systematic oppression over the Palestinians,” she said.



Doha Film Festival: Annual event opens with 'The Voice of Hind Rajab'


Trump’s plan

Since the Security Council embraced the ceasefire deal, Israel has faced less international pressure. Even the push for measures like suspending the country from the Eurovision singing contest and European football have lost momentum.

On Monday, Germany announced it was lifting restrictions on weapons exports to Israel, citing the truce.

“That is probably what scares us the most because we see regression here,” Novak said.

Jubran, B’Tselem’s field research director, also stressed the need for accountability, saying that the previous rounds of wars on Gaza from 2006 onwards enabled the genocide.

“That’s what allowed the genocide system to be more brazen in order to do its crime against the Palestinians in Gaza,” he told Al Jazeera.

Despite the lack of political or legal accountability, Novak hailed the growing international public awareness of Israel’s atrocities, which she said politicians are choosing to ignore.

“If there is something that gives us hope in this really, really terrible moment, it is the fact that many people around the world are able to see through the Israeli propaganda and just to make sense of what their eyes saw, and some of the voices of the victims were able to come out from Gaza and from the West Bank,” she said.

“So people do understand. We are in the moment where people need to demand their leaders and politicians to hold Israel accountable.”


Friday, November 21, 2025

No AIM-260 JATM For Saudi F-35s; U.S. Could Retain Qualitative Military Edge For Israeli Military



Friday, November 21, 2025


No AIM-260 JATM For Saudi F-35s; U.S. Could Retain Qualitative Military Edge For Israeli Military: Expert


By Sakshi Tiwari


Saudi Arabia has finally received approval from US President Donald Trump to purchase F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters. However, US officials and defense experts have said that the aircraft will likely be less advanced than Israel’s F-35I Adir.

President Donald Trump designated Saudi Arabia a major non-NATO ally of the United States during a visit by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to Washington, DC, on November 18 and signed a “historic strategic defence agreement.”

Additionally, the White House announced that Trump authorized a future delivery of F-35 stealth fighters to Saudi Arabia, and the country had agreed to buy 300 US tanks.

The US President did not reveal the number of jets that will be sold, but previous reports suggested that Riyadh had formally requested 48 F-35 fighters. There is speculation in the media that the number of jets could be reduced to two squadrons, or 24 aircraft.

Approval for the sale of F-35s was granted despite stiff opposition from the IDF (Israel Defense Forces), which fears that the delivery of these cutting-edge stealth fighters would erode its Qualitative Military Edge (QME) in the tumultuous Middle East.

Notably, the sale was approved just days after the Israeli Air Force (IAF), which operates a special F-35 Adir variant, raised objections to the sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia in a formal position paper submitted to political leaders.

The US has a long-standing agreement with Israel, which stipulates that US weapons supplied to Israel should be “superior in capability” compared to those sold to Israel’s neighbors and rivals in the region. Therefore, to strike a balance, the US could downgrade the F-35s meant for Saudi Arabia, US officials and defense experts told Reuters.


File Image: F-35 Adir


The scope of these modifications is currently unknown, but experts believe that, unlike Israel, which has US-approved permissions to modify its F-35s independently, Saudi Arabia could be prohibited from making such alterations.

This would prevent Riyadh from tailoring the jets to its specific needs or upgrading them over time. Whether Saudi Arabia has that technical capability is a different question.

The US could make the Saudi F-35s technologically inferior to Israeli jets based on the software package commissioned for the jet. The F-35’s software governs sensor fusion, data sharing, and mission planning. The US can integrate the Saudi versions with a less capable baseline configuration, restricting access to full-spectrum updates, AI-driven targeting, and network-centric warfare tools that Israel enjoys.

Additionally, it can ensure that the Saudi jets do not receive certain other advanced Israeli features, such as enhanced electronic warfare suites for jamming radars and disrupting enemy communications, thereby limiting their defensive and offensive versatility in contested airspace.

It can also limit the number of jets that Saudi Arabia acquires so that Israel can have a numerical superiority. Israel currently has 45 of these jets, with 30 more on order.

Additionally, the US can restrict the weapons Saudi Arabia receives alongside the F-35. Douglas Birkey, the executive director of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, told Reuters that even if it receives the jet, Saudi Arabia is unlikely to obtain the AIM-260 JATM (Joint Air Tactical Missile).

The AIM-260 is a highly classified weapon with an expected range of 120 miles (about 194 kilometers) or more. The US has not publicly acknowledged any plans to export the missile, much less to Israel. However, based on the defense cooperation between the two countries, which allows Tel Aviv to receive priority access to cutting-edge munitions, there are speculations that Israel may be offered the missile.

It must be noted that Israel was the first country to receive and operationally deploy the F-35, and the only country that has the freedom to upgrade the aircraft without restrictions.

If approved for export, the AIM-260 could be integrated on Israel’s F-35I, enabling internal carriage for stealthy, long-range engagements.

Long-range air-to-air missiles typically enable fighter aircraft to engage and neutralize enemy aircraft and other High-Value Airborne Assets from very far ranges. Once IDF acquires AIM-260, the Israel Air Force will have a clear edge over the Royal Saudi Air Force (RSAF).

Therefore, while Saudi Arabia’s acquisition of F-35 will certainly end Israel’s stealth monopoly in the region, the integration of a long-range missile will ensure that it continues to operate the most sensitive, advanced tech in the region.

That, however, does not put Saudi Arabia in a position of complete disadvantage. The country currently operates one of the most powerful and diverse fleets in the Middle East, which includes the F-15C/D (an aircraft with 100 kills and zero losses), the F-15S and F-15SA (the advanced F-15 variant on which the F-15EX is based), Tornado upgraded to the GR4 standard, and Eurofighter Typhoon.

Even if it acquires the F-35, the 24-48 jets would form a very small part of the massive Royal Saudi Air Force (RSAF) inventory.

The possible F-35 “downgrade” would ensure that Israel retains a military edge, but the RSAF would still benefit from the aircraft’s core advantages, such as low observability and data-linking, to name a few.

The Royal Saudi Air Force (RSAF) relies on advanced 4.5-generation fighters such as the F-15SA Strike Eagle and Eurofighter Typhoon Tranche 2, which have undergone significant upgrades to modern avionics and networking. These platforms excel in individual sensor performance and basic data-sharing.

While stealth is a very important tool in modern combat, it is barely invincible. Stealth reduces radar cross-section (RCS) dramatically, but it never reaches zero, and the aircraft could still very much be detected by the adversary.

Interestingly, in 2012, a German Eurofighter Typhoon beat the F-22 Raptor in a couple of dogfights at the Red Flag air combat exercises over Alaska. The F-22 is positioned as the most advanced fifth-generation stealth air superiority fighter jet by the US.

In fact, a French Rafale (comparable to the Eurofighter that Saudi Arabia operates) managed to “score a kill” against the American F-35 stealth fighter at a multinational military exercise in Finland.

A cash-rich Saudi Arabia has the option to explore the acquisition of other fifth-generation stealth fighters, such as the Turkish KAAN. Or, it could join a sixth-generation fighter program, the GCAP.

The F-35 would be a valuable addition to the Saudi inventory, but the full squadron delivery will not be completed before 2030, meaning nothing will radically change in the region for quite a few years.

By the time deliveries are complete, Israel could acquire the sixth-generation F-47, as previously discussed in a EurAsian Times report.

Before the deal is finalized, a formal qualitative military edge (QME) evaluation will be necessary, the US officials told Reuters. For the sale of F-35 to Saudi Arabia to go through, it will have to be approved by Congress, which could be hindered due to Israel’s influence over Capitol Hill. This essentially means that the sale is not set in stone, at least as of now.
The AIM-260 As An Air Superiority Determinant

The existence of the AIM-260 JATM was initially confirmed in 2019 during an Air Force Life Cycle Management Center industry conference. Due to its sensitivity, the AIM-260 JATM is classified as a Special Access Program (SAP), and details about the missile remain scarce.

Developed by Lockheed Martin in collaboration with the US Air Force and Navy, the ‘AIM-260′ is a long-range missile that will succeed the AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM), which has a range of 150 kilometers.

Although there is a paucity of details about the classified missile, speculation suggests it will be powered by ramjets or dual-pulse rocket motors to enhance its performance and range.

Additionally, experts and military observers believe the AIM-260 will feature an advanced multi-mode seeker system, possibly incorporating infrared imaging and active radar. They assert that with this dual-seeker design, the missile’s accuracy and resistance to electronic warfare countermeasures would both be greatly increased.

An F-22 Raptor firing AIM-260 JATM in a USAF rendering


The AIM-260 is expected to contain a two-way datalink, similar to the latest AIM-120D-3 AMRAAM variant. The missile’s effectiveness would be further increased by this feature, which would enable mid-course targeting updates or re-targeting.

Israel’s fleet enables networked warfare with real-time data fusion from its advanced C4I (command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence) systems, amplifying the AIM-260’s two-way datalink for mid-course guidance updates. Saudi forces, with less mature integration, would face interoperability gaps.

The AIM-260 beyond-visual-range missile would be crucial in a potential combat, as it would enable the aircraft to destroy high-value assets, such as the adversary’s AEW&C aircraft and refuelling tankers flying deep inside the ‘safe zone’.

The AIM-260 would be designed to counter stealth aircraft and operate in contested environments with heavy electronic jamming, thereby ensuring effectiveness against advanced adversaries like China and Russia.

The US is purportedly advancing work on this missile because the first-strike advantage is often decisive in modern combat. With the AIM-260, USAF and US Navy’s fighter jets would have an air-to-air weapon capable of striking a wide spectrum of aerial threats hundreds of miles away. The same goes for an Israeli F-35 and AIM-260 combination.

Interestingly, the USAF earlier stated that the JATM “is the number-one air-delivered weapon priority for both the Air Force and the Navy, and out-prioritizes other weapon system improvements and modernization efforts on any fielded aircraft.”

The US Air Force (USAF) and US Navy have, for the first time, publicly requested $670.5 million in funding for the acquisition of the classified air-to-air AIM-260 Joint Advanced Tactical Missile (JATM) in the fiscal 2026 budget request that was released on June 26. They have also requested $687 million for the continued development of the missile.

Initially introduced for the F-22 Raptor, the missile will eventually be fitted to the F-35 and the Navy’s F/A-18E/F. In fact, the AIM-260 JATM will also likely arm the US Navy’s sixth-generation combat aircraft, which is currently under development.

The missile has been tested at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., but when it will enter serial production is currently unknown.


Zelensky: Engulfed in Scandals, Cabinet In Ruins, Can Ukraine Defy Trump’s “Surrender Deal”?



Friday, November 21, 2025


Zelensky: Engulfed in Scandals, Cabinet In Ruins, Can Ukraine Defy Trump’s “Surrender Deal”? OPED


By Prakash Nanda


Can President Volodymyr Zelensky withstand the mounting pressure from the Trump Administration to be a party to a reported Russian-American peace proposal, even as he is undergoing the most challenging test of saving wartime unity at home following what is said to be the most significant corruption scandal of his tenure?

The question is becoming increasingly difficult to answer with each passing day.

As of now, the scandal has cost him two ministers – Justice Minister German Galushchenko and Energy Minister Svitlana Hrynchuk. But this seems to be just the beginning, not the end.

The timing of the scandal could not have come at a worse time. With winter approaching and the Russian forces seemingly at an advantage, the British and the American media reported on November 19 stories of a secret 28-point ceasefire plan between the US and Russia that envisages Ukraine settling with its invader on crippling terms.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the proposal has been drafted by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. It says Kyiv must cede control of the eastern Donbas region, a long-standing Russian demand.

If the Daily Telegraph of London is to be believed, the region will not be ceded to Ukraine; it will retain legal ownership, and Russia would pay an undisclosed sum for its control.

However, Crimea would be recognized as Russian territory; Ukraine would have to reduce its military size and could not possess long-range missiles. It will not join NATO and will also block the deployment of foreign troops in its territory.


That this proposal has not been officially acknowledged by the Trump Administration as yet is a different matter, though the American President’s inclination toward such a plan to end the war is widely known.

Under normal circumstances, such news would have unified all the Ukrainians to stand behind Zelensky in protest, but that does not seem to be the case.

The corruption scandals in the last six months have made him as unpopular as ever, with his approval rating coming down 50 percent in opinion polls. In fact, as one writes this, Zelensky is due to face members of his parliamentary party, many of whom want more ministers to be sacked. On November 19, the Ukrainian parliament voted to dismiss the energy and justice ministers.

The scandal involves a group of individuals, including officials and businessmen close to the government, who allegedly used the state-owned Energoatom, Ukraine’s biggest electricity producer, for their own illegal enrichment.

Apparently, private companies paid kickbacks to informal “overseers” for the right to work with Energoatom, and this illicit cash was then laundered through the group’s financial network. The criminal scheme’s mastermind was supposedly none other than Timur Mindich, a former business partner of Zelensky.


Mindich is said to have organized a scheme in which at least $100 million was stolen over the last 15 months from the state nuclear power company through kickbacks to contractors.

When investigators bugged an apartment and an office in Kyiv where Mindich and others, including a government minister and an executive at the nuclear company, discussed divvying up hundreds of thousands of dollars and moving money to Switzerland and Israel.

The ripple effects of the revelations are said to be now spreading to affect a growing number of senior officials, including former defense minister Rustem Umerov, recently appointed Prime Minister Yulia Sviridenko, and others.


It is also alleged that former deputy prime minister Oleksiy Chernyshev, another member of Zelensky’s circle of confidantes (Zelensky’s wife is supposedly godmother to Chernyshev’s child), is accused of receiving cash from Mindich’s shadow coffers.


And to all this, there is the alleged involvement of people formerly associated with Andrei Derkach, the longtime head of Energoatom who defected to Russia in 2022 and is now a member of Russia’s upper chamber of parliament, the Federation Council.

Incidentally, tackling corruption has been a major issue ever since Zelensky assumed office in 2019. In fact, as the EurAsian Times had pointed out in July, the movement against Zelensky was marked with street protests after he had moved to neutralize the anti-corruption agencies, particularly the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), through a new law.

The protests, accompanied by Western criticisms, were so intense that he was forced to repeal the laws.

And all this was when the whole of last year (2024) was full of allegations of corruption involving Ukraine’s war efforts. The SBU had discovered a mass corruption scheme in the purchase of weapons by the country’s military, amounting to nearly $40 million (1.5 billion Ukrainian hryvnia).

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky listens his national anthem as he arrives at the Villacoublay air base, in Velizy-Villacoublay, near Paris on November 17, 2025. Ukraine’s President visits Paris on November 17, in a new bid to secure weaponry to defend his country against increasingly lethal Russian missile and drone attacks. His visit is part of a brief tour of his western allies. (Photo by Christophe Ena / POOL / AFP)


Of course, corruption has been a long-standing problem in Ukraine, which has posed a major hurdle to its membership in the European Union (EU).

Apparently, Ukraine scored 35 out of 100 points on the 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI).

In a recent study by Transparency International, Ukraine ranks 105th out of 180 countries. The fact remains that apart from Russia (154), Belarus (114), and Bosnia and Herzegovina (114), no other European country is perceived as more corrupt than Ukraine, according to this Index.

Be that as it may, allegations of graft, even if unfounded, have tarnished the reputation of the Zelensky government. So much so that now, thinking Ukrainians are not buying the standard logic of Zelensky’s supporters that all these allegations of corruption are being promoted by Russia-connected politicians, media groups, and oligarchs from influencing Ukrainian politics, and that the government is only taking countermeasures.

In fact, the present scandal has encouraged such cynicism that many Ukrainian soldiers have reportedly started deserting the armed forces. Abroad, it is making it harder for Ukraine to ask for the aid it needs, estimated at $100bn per year.

Accusations of corruption have also generated fear among political analysts that these could cause a realignment against Zelensky in Parliament, particularly when his political party, Servant of the People, wants more resignations, including that of Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak.

It is alleged that Yermak played a role in a scheme that saw the siphoning off of funds earmarked for building defenses to protect Ukraine’s vulnerable energy infrastructure from Russian air attacks to third parties. Yermak is also reportedly Zelenskyy’s point man for ties with Washington.

Of course, notwithstanding all these allegations, and with elections suspended under martial law, Zelensky cannot be voted out of office. His term was originally scheduled to end in May 2024, but the ongoing Russian invasion and the resulting martial law prevented the regularly scheduled presidential election from being held. He is expected to remain President as long as the Russo-Ukrainian War continues.

However, his lack of support in the Parliament may now weaken his ability to pass legislation. He was supposed to pass his budget this week, but the schedule has now been postponed.

Obviously, in the absence of adequate strength to pass legislation, Zelensky does not seem to be in a position of strength to make quick decisions, so vital during a war. Will he be able to resist the seemingly Trump-Putin proposal? Time will tell.Author and veteran journalist Prakash Nanda is Chairman of the Editorial Board of the EurAsian Times and has been commenting on politics, foreign policy, and strategic affairs for nearly three decades. He is a former National Fellow of the Indian Council for Historical Research and a recipient of the Seoul Peace Prize Scholarship.


***


If Poms have their way, they'll encourage Ukraine to fight to the last Ukrainians, wakakaka.


PKR Could Be Wiped Out – PM Anwar Faces Real Test In Sabah





PKR Could Be Wiped Out – PM Anwar Faces Real Test In Sabah


November 19th, 2025 by financetwitter



First, the good news – no matter which parties form the next Sabah government, they would realign with the federal government under Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. That had been the case in the past – previous Barisan Nasional and Perikatan Nasional federal governments – and it will be the same with the current Pakatan Harapan-led multi-coalition government, as well as any future governments.

The 17th Sabah State Election, with a record-breaking 596 candidates vying for 73 seats (averaging eight candidates per seat, with four-horse races being the minimum and even a 14-way contest), is very important because it is the first in a series of state polls – next up are Melaka, Johor and Sarawak – between now and 2028, by when Malaysia’s 16th General Election must be held.


Candidates in the super-crowded election include 74 independents, 73 from Parti Warisan, 72 from Parti Impian Sabah, 55 from Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS), 46 from Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku (STAR), 45 from Barisan Nasional (BN), 42 from Perikatan Nasional (PN), and 40 from Parti KDM. PM Anwar’s Pakatan Harapan alliance has fielded 22 candidates, with Anwar’s own party PKR contesting 10 seats.


Sabah is arguably the only state in Malaysia where independent candidates stand an equal chance of winning, just like those contesting under the banner of powerful and rich political parties. The game is to win – either fairly or through vote buying – first, before hopping like a frog to the winning camp which promises rewards in the form of cash, lucrative projects or government portfolios.

The Borneo state is both interesting and strange because the Anwar-led Pakatan Harapan (PH) pact is currently a government coalition partner of the ruling Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS), an alliance of eight local parties, while another coalition of parties, Barisan Nasional (BN), is in the opposition led by Warisan. This is unlike at the federal level, where all these coalitions are part of Anwar’s government.


It’s unlikely that a single party or coalition could win enough seats to form a simple-majority government in Sabah. Therefore, rivals could become allies, and foes could become friends after the state election. Heck, even after a state government has been formed, it could still collapse as existing “half-baked anti-hopping law” does not stop independents or party assemblymen from shifting support to a potential chief minister.


There’s a reason why Sabah election is also infamously known as a “frog season”. There’s no loyalty amongst thieves, let alone amongst politicians here. There are no permanent enemies or friends, only permanent interests. Before the election was called, GRS had 39 seats, Warisan had 14 seats, BN had 10 seats, PH had 7 seats, and Parti KDM had 1 seat (with 2 seats remained vacant). That may change.

Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS), formed in Sept 2020, was itself an informal alliance which has gone through phases of betrayal, treachery, back-stabbing, coup, defection, corruption, back-stabbing and whatnot till today. To make it even more interesting, PH and BN have announced an electoral pact to mirror its federal partnership, but BN has refused to work with GRS, despite GRS stating its intention to continue working with PH.

This stemmed from bad blood between GRS and BN, when some BN members tried and failed to topple the government led by Sabah chief minister and GRS chairman Hajiji Noor in a 2023 political crisis known as the Kinabalu Move. At the time, five BN assemblymen chose to continue supporting Hajiji. Make no mistake – both BN and GRS still desire to continue working with PH because Anwar is the premier.


Now the bad news – even though Anwar is the prime minister, his Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR or People’s Justice party) could be easily wiped out. In the previous Sabah state election in 2020, PKR won only 2 seats. Mr Anwar was in the opposition camp back then. However, PKR was never a force to be reckoned with in Sabah in the first place.



Five years later today, Anwar is not only the 10th Prime Minister, but also controls the powerful finance minister. Yet, his PKR only dares to contest 10 out of 73 seats – a sign of the party’s weakness and Anwar’s lack of influence in Borneo. If he is so popular as he would like the people to believe, PKR or Pakatan Harapan should at least “double their share” of seats to contest.

It’s a lame excuse to say PKR doesn’t want to increase its number of seats because it doesn’t wish to jeopardize the chances of both allies BN and GRS. BN is contesting 45 seats and there’s no telling it may work with Warisan to form a state government without the need of GRS or PH. Likewise, GRS is contesting 55 seats and there’s no guarantee it won’t form a government with PN without BN or PH.


Warisan president Shafie Apdal – the previous Sabah chief minister whose party led the last state government between May 2018 and September 2020 – has his own political reason and calculation by contesting all the 73 seats on its own. He does not trust any of the Sabah political parties, let alone those from Malaya (Peninsular or West Malaysia).

“Before the elections they are quarrelling about allocation of seats. After the election, they will quarrel about which ministry they will have. If you don’t fulfill that, they will jump. So, what is the benefit for us to work with too many parties? You will be only trying to resolve the needs of that particular party, the leaders of that particular party,” – said Shafie Apdal.

While it appears that Warisan has been “pretty quiet” over the years, in reality, it has been working silently very hard in the rural areas, especially in its strongholds on the east coast of Sabah. This “less talking, more working” approach might appeal to voters. Local Sabahans may prefer a local party like Warisan compared to a messy GRS, which has worked in the past with PN and now with PH.




On paper, Anwar’s PKR should not only be able to defend its 2 seats, but also capture more seats for obvious reasons. As the finance minister holding the purse strings, he could – easily and quietly – buy votes, which could be as cheap as bribing each Sabahan with “Gardenia” bread as Islamist party PAS suggested recently. It would be both disaster and humiliation if PKR performs worse than in 2020.

That explains why the prime minister is under tremendous pressure to ensure PKR does not get annihilated. By hook or by crook, he must at least defend 2 seats for PKR. Anwar was so desperate that out of 10 PKR candidates for the Sabah election, four were “parachute candidates” – referring to candidates who jumped from other parties or candidates who had just joined the party.

Narcissist Anwar was also so afraid of losing face if PKR is defeated that he has even recruited Yamani Hafez, the son of Musa Aman, who in turn was the most corrupt former Sabah Chief Minister but was promoted as Sabah Governor by the Anwar administration. Yamani was once a member of UMNO before hopping to Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu) and now PKR.


Similarly, PKR’s Melalap candidate, Jamawi Jaafar, also once joined UMNO and was with Parti Warisan when Sabah was under the party’s administration. However, when Warisan fell in 2020, Warisan returned to UMNO and when UMNO was not on the same page with GRS in 2023, Jamawi jumped ship to GRS and is now in PKR. And you can bet your last dollar that he will jump again.

PKR’s another frog, George Hiew, was originally from DAP, before he jumped to join Warisan and managed to become an assistant minister. But when the party fell, he switched sides to GRS, and is now in PKR. Loyalty is a rare commodity amongst these parachute candidates. Even if they all win, PKR could still lose all the seats overnight just like how the party lost everything in the Melaka state election in 2021.



But the risk of PKR candidates defecting after winning is not the only problem faced by the party. A key issue expected to feature during the campaign period is last month’s Kota Kinabalu High Court ruling that the Malaysian federal government had acted unlawfully by failing to fulfil Sabah’s 40% entitlement for nearly 50 years. This has forced the Anwar administration to do damage control.


In a “carefully calculated move”, obviously after having consulted with the Prime Minister Office (PMO), the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has said that it will not appeal the ruling. Yet, at the same time, the AGC has challenged parts of the court’s decision. Forked-tongue Anwar contradicted himself when he told Parliament that the Federal Government’s “appeal” is limited to specific aspects of the court’s judgment on the issue.

Anwar might think he could hoodwink Sabahans by spinning and twisting that his Madani government cares about the Borneo state. However, the resignation of UPKO President Ewon Benedick from the Cabinet and the withdrawal of UPKO from Pakatan Harapan over disagreement with the AGC’s stance speaks volumes about the federal government’s hypocrisy, lies, and untrustworthiness.

It doesn’t take a genius to tell it was purely political drama when the Anwar government took almost 4 weeks (26 days to be precise) to announce (on Nov 12) that it would not appeal since the day Kota Kinabalu High Court ruled on Oct 17 that the Federal Government had acted unlawfully and beyond its constitutional authority by failing to fulfil Sabah’s right to 40% of federal revenue from 1974 to 2021.


Even then, it was only after Ewon’s resignation, followed by UPKO withdrawal, that Anwar scrambled to pretend that the federal government would not appeal (which was a lie and a scam). Rubbing salt on the wound, DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke tried to defend his boss Anwar by attacking Ewon, only to be grilled by the UPKO president – exposing Loke’s ignorance and lies.



Loke, known for keeping quiet when the ethnic Chinese are being bullied, was speechless when he was challenged by Ewon to explain to the people of Sabah the “eight points” the federal government wants to challenge concerning Sabah’s 40% claims. Loke had falsely accused Ewon of not expressing his objections during Cabinet meetings on the 40% claim.

No matter how Anwar twists the spin that his government is not cheating the people of Sabah or plundering the state’s resources, the fact remains that Sabah is one of Malaysia’s poorest states despite being a major contributor to the country’s oil and gas output, and it is still locked in negotiations with the federal government on returning to its entitlement of 40% of its revenue, which it says is crucial for development.


Beside Sabah, another Borneo state – Sarawak – is also pushing for one-third of the parliamentary seats at the federal level to be allocated to them as stipulated in the Malaysia Agreement 1963. Again, chameleon Anwar said the time is not ripe for the one-third seats allocation – another proof that the federal government has been cheating and lying all along.

The Malaysia Agreement signed in 1963 formed the basis of the formation of the Federation of Malaysia. It recognises Sabah and Sarawak not as mere states but as equal partners with West Malaysia. It was the Federal Government’s refusal to recognize the agreement it had signed in 1963 that has sparked the “Sabah for Sabahans” sentiment – a desire for local-based parties to govern Sabah exclusively.

Crucially, many Sabahans still remember and view Anwar with distrust because when he served as former PM Mahathir Mohamad’s deputy in government from 1993 to 1998, Anwar was involved in covert operations to alter the demographics of the state by issuing citizenships to illegal Muslim refugees from the neighbouring islands of southern Philippines and Indonesia.




The biggest factor which terrifies PKR is the unpredictable uprising of Gen-Z, who shocked both the Sabah state and Anwar government last year when thousands gathered to demand justice for the suspicious death of Form One student Zara Qairina Mahathir. Her death has sparked nationwide protests with many Malaysians demanding an end to a culture of bullying in the education system.

The same Generation Z, referring to individuals born approximately between 1997 and 2012, was also responsible for the rally to protest the corruption scandal plaguing the Hajiji administration, but has been shamefully protected by PM Anwar with the lame excuse that the anti-corruption agency could not act due to lack of evidence – despite overwhelming video clips and key witness.

Now, the Gen-Z could retaliate over the bread and butter issue – water disruptions, lack of electricity, and rising cost of living hitting university students. When the youngsters started burning a caricature of Anwar over widespread corruption in Sabah, it was not merely a protest, but a “warning” to both state and federal governments.


And while bread and butter issues will dominate the Sabah election, the state polls are also a barometer of the level of support that Anwar’s daughter Nurul Izzah – newly elected to the post of deputy president of her father’s political party – can galvanise. The election of Nurul in May had sparked accusations of nepotism, incompetence, and dynasty politics.

If Anwar’s daughter fails to increase PKR’s seats, PKR would be in trouble not only in the coming state elections in Melaka, Johor and Sarawak, but also the 16th General Election. Anwar Ibrahim could be just a 1-term prime minister while Pakatan Harapan may end up as the opposition again. Sabah’s new government may switch sides, the same way GRS abandoned Perikatan Nasional after the 15th General Election.


Amirudin may go federal, moots Nurul Izzah as his successor


FMT:

Amirudin may go federal, moots Nurul Izzah as his successor


Yesterday
Elill Easwaran

The Selangor menteri besar, who may be serving his final term, says passing the baton to Nurul Izzah Anwar at state level would avoid claims of nepotism


Amirudin Shari has hinted he may be in his final term, and suggested grooming Nurul Izzah Anwar as a potential successor to lead Selangor.


PETALING JAYA: Selangor menteri besar Amirudin Shari has hinted that he could be moving on to a federal post, suggesting that PKR deputy president Nurul Izzah Anwar may be a potential successor.

Amirudin said Nurul Izzah, the daughter of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, would gain valuable administrative experience if she took charge of Selangor, without sparking charges of nepotism should she be appointed directly to the federal Cabinet.

“And honestly, I’ve already put the idea to Izzah herself. It’s up to her whether to take it or not,” he said in the latest episode of the Keluar Sekejap podcast.


Nurul Izzah currently holds no elected position after losing the Permatang Pauh seat in the 2022 general election. She had briefly served as senior economic and finance adviser to the prime minister.

Amirudin, now in his second term, also confirmed he is considering a federal post. “Personally, yes, I have started considering moving to the federal level. If there is a ministerial opportunity, no problem, I will try my best. But for now, I will finish my term as menteri besar,” he added.

The current Selangor government’s mandate lasts until 2028. Amirudin had previously indicated he preferred staying on as menteri besar rather than taking up a federal post.

A Cabinet reshuffle may be imminent following the resignation of Upko president Ewon Benedick as entrepreneur development and cooperatives minister, while the Senate term of investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz ends next month.

The prime minister has so far remained tight-lipped on a possible reshuffle.

Two other Cabinet posts have been vacant since May following the resignations of economy minister Rafizi Ramli, and natural resources and environment sustainability minister Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad.


Their portfolios are being handled by finance minister II Amir Hamzah Azizan, and plantation and commodities minister Johari Ghani, respectively.


Door open for Rafizi’s return

On PKR’s internal elections, Amirudin acknowledged that the contest between Rafizi and Nurul Izzah had caused some damage but stressed it was “not as serious as widely reported”.

He said Rafizi’s political return was still possible.


“I see a door still open for Rafizi to come back into the party, even though people say he no longer sees a path. Historically, he has come back before.

“I see it the same way now. If he wants to return, I believe the party will welcome him. But if he chooses to continue building his success through his social business activities, that is his choice and should be respected,” he said.

In July, Rafizi had suggested that he might quit PKR after his current parliamentary term, frustrated by the party’s internal culture. He said he could not leave immediately, as he still holds a mandate from the people of Pandan.

Palestinians ‘squeezed’ as Israel moves beyond ‘yellow line’ in Gaza City


al Jazeera:

Palestinians ‘squeezed’ as Israel moves beyond ‘yellow line’ in Gaza City

Move comes as Israeli attacks on bombarded enclave killed at least 32 Palestinians and wounded 88 others in 24 hours


Mourners react at the funeral of Palestinians killed in overnight Israeli attacks on Gaza, at al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, November 20, 2025 [Dawoud Abu Alkas/Reuters]


By Al Jazeera Staff
Published On 20 Nov 2025


Dozens of Palestinian families are “besieged” in northern Gaza, local authorities say, as the Israeli military has repositioned its forces deeper into the enclave in violation of a United States-brokered ceasefire agreement.

Gaza’s Government Media Office said on Thursday that Israeli forces and tanks had advanced about 300 metres (984 feet) beyond the so-called “yellow line” in eastern Gaza City.


Recommended Stories



“The fate of many of these families remains unknown amidst the shelling that targeted the area,” the office said, adding that the expansion of the yellow line shows a “blatant disregard” for the ceasefire deal.

Set out in the agreement between Israel and Hamas, the yellow line refers to an unmarked boundary where the Israeli military repositioned itself when the deal came into effect last month.

It has allowed Israel, which routinely fires at Palestinians who approach the line, to retain control over more than half of the coastal territory.



Israel kills at least 30 Palestinians in wave of Gaza ‘ceasefire’ attacks


Reporting from Gaza City on Thursday, Al Jazeera’s Hind Khoudary said Israeli soldiers were seen placing yellow blocks and signs to identify the new deployment line, deeper into the city’s eastern neighbourhood of Shujayea.

“But the entire boundary has not been marked, so many Palestinians do not know exactly where it is,” Khoudary said.

“With this latest advancement in Gaza City’s Shujayea, more Palestinians are unable to reach their homes. People say this is a cage, as they’re being pushed and squeezed into the western parts of Gaza.”

The Israeli military has not publicly commented on the reports that it has gone beyond the yellow line in violation of the ceasefire.



‘When will this nightmare end?’


The move comes amid a surge in Israeli attacks across the Gaza Strip that have sown fear across the war-ravaged enclave.

The Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza said on Thursday morning that at least 32 Palestinians were killed in Israeli attacks over the past 24 hours and another 88 were wounded.

Medics said an Israeli air strike on a house in Bani Suheila, a town east of Khan Younis, killed three people, including a baby girl, and wounded 15 others.

Israel has violated the truce nearly 400 times since it came into force on October 10, according to an Al Jazeera analysis.





A displaced Palestinian man, 36-year-old Mohammed Hamdouna, told the AFP news agency that people are being killed daily in continued shelling.

“We are still living in tents. The cities are rubble, the crossings are still closed, and all the basic necessities of life are still lacking,” he said.

Lina Kuraz, a 33-year-old from the Tuffah neighbourhood east of Gaza City, also told AFP that she was worried about the full-blown war starting up again.

“Every time we try to regain hope, the shelling starts again,” Kuraz said. “When will this nightmare end?”


***


Murderous genocidal shailoks - we need Adolf again


‘Chaotic’ culture in UK government led to more COVID deaths, inquiry finds


al Jazeera:

‘Chaotic’ culture in UK government led to more COVID deaths, inquiry finds


An inquiry commissioned in 2021 has found ex-PM Boris Johnson failed to act decisively to combat the global pandemic


Former UK prime minister Boris Johnson faces questioning at a public inquiry over his government's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. [Photo by UK Covid-19 Inquiry / AFP]


By Abby Rogers and News Agencies
Published On 20 Nov 202520 Nov 2025


The “toxic and chaotic” culture at the centre of the United Kingdom’s government led to a delayed response to the COVID-19 pandemic that resulted in about 23,000 more deaths across the nation, a damning report from an inquiry into the government’s handling of the pandemic has found.

The inquiry, which former Prime Minister Boris Johnson ordered in May 2021, delivered a blistering assessment (PDF) on Thursday of his government’s response to COVID-19, criticising his indecisive leadership, lambasting his Downing Street office for breaking their own rules and castigating his top adviser Dominic Cummings. The inquiry was chaired by former judge Heather Hallett.


Recommended Stories



“The failure to appreciate the scale of the threat, or the urgency of response it demanded, meant that by the time the possibility of a mandatory lockdown was first considered it was already too late and a lockdown had become unavoidable,” the inquiry found. “At the centre of the UK government there was a toxic and chaotic culture.”

The global pandemic, which began in 2020, killed millions of people worldwide, with countries enforcing lockdowns in an attempt to stop the spread of the virus.

The UK went into lockdown on March 23, 2020, at which time it was “too little, too late,” the inquiry found, revealing that if the nation had gone into lockdown just a week earlier, on March 16, the number of deaths in the first wave of the pandemic up to July would have been reduced by about 23,000, or 48 percent.

“Had the UK been better prepared, lives would have been saved, suffering reduced and the economic cost of the pandemic far lower,” the inquiry found.
Advertisement

A failure to act sooner again, as cases rose later in the year, also led to further national lockdowns, Hallett’s inquiry found.

A campaign group for bereaved families said “it is devastating to think of the lives that could have been saved under a different Prime Minister”.

There was no immediate comment from Johnson on the inquiry’s findings.

The UK recorded more than 230,000 deaths from COVID, a similar death rate to the United States and Italy, but higher than elsewhere in western Europe, and it is still recovering from the economic consequences.



Is the world ready for another pandemic?


“Mr. Johnson should have appreciated sooner that this was an emergency that required prime ministerial leadership to inject urgency into the response,” the inquiry found.

Following the release of the inquiry’s findings, Sir Ed Davey called on Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the Conservative Party, to apologise on behalf of the Conservatives.

“As this report is published, my thoughts and prayers are with all those who lost loved ones during the pandemic, and everyone who suffered,” Davey said. “This report confirms the abject failure of the last Conservative government.”

Ellie Chowns, a Green Party MP for North Herefordshire, said the British people were “let down” by their government.

“Families and communities – especially children – are still living with the consequences. It’s vital to learn from this report, and invest far more seriously in pandemic preparedness, so that Britain can be secure and resilient if – or when – we are again faced with such a challenge.”

The first cases of COVID-19 were detected in Wuhan, China, in late 2019, and information from the country is seen as key to preventing future pandemics. As late as June 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) said it was working to uncover the origin of the pandemic, with its work still incomplete, as critical information has “not been provided”.

“We continue to appeal to China and any other country that has information about the origins of COVID-19 to share that information openly, in the interests of protecting the world from future pandemics,” WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in June.

In 2021, Tedros launched the WHO Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), a panel of 27 independent international experts.

Marietjie Venter, the group’s chair, said earlier this year that most scientific data supports the hypothesis that the new coronavirus jumped to humans from animals.

But she added that after more than three years of work, SAGO was unable to get the necessary data to evaluate whether or not COVID was the result of a lab accident, despite repeated requests for detailed information made to the Chinese government.


The Sabah state election was not meant to influence federal politics, but…..



Murray Hunter


The Sabah state election was not meant to influence federal politics, but…..


The Sabah election may show just how fragile the ‘unity coalition’ really is


Nov 21, 2025



Picture Bernama


The 17th Sabah state election has become very complex with 569 candidates standing for 73 seats on Saturday 29th November. Some constituencies using first-past-the-post system are 4-way contests going up to 14-way contests. There are 74 independent candidates, 73 from Warisan, 72 from Parti Impian Sabah, 55 from Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) – the current government, 46 from Parti Solidarity Tanah Airku (STAR), 45 from Barisan Nasional (BN), 42 from Perikatan Nasional (PN), 40 from Parti KDM, and 22 from prime minister Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Harapan (PH) (DAP 12 seats and PKR 10 seats).

Any political analyst who claims they can pick the result is just guessing as there is really not reliable polling. There is a paradox between what is happening on the ground and loyalty to old political clans, with Sabah still largely underdeveloped. A large youth cohort making up around one-third of first-time voters and money-politics will certainly influence the outcome. There are parties advocating “Sabah for Sabahans” and peninsula-based parties contesting the election.

However, its expected that the election is really a competition between the ruling GRS with an alliance of 8 parties and Warisan which is running alone. STAR, BN, and PH are expected to make up new coalitions should the results be undecisive on Saturday. This doesn’t factor in post-election defections and party hopping, a feature of Sabah politics.

Sabah politics is largely ‘personality’ driven, rather than policy driven, at least until this election. This time there are a number of factors that may change things. The overall underdevelopment of Sabah is a major issue. The recent court decision giving Sabah the right to 40 percent of the revenue collected in the state is another important issue. The federal government challenging the decision by appeal could have electoral ramifications.

Issues over the MA63 and oil and gas revenues always come up during elections. Ewon’s resignation from the federal cabinet and subsequent withdrawal of his party UPKO from the ‘unity government is another unknown. Scandals around central politicians in the Hajiji Noor GRS government are another issue. The death of Form One student Zara Qairina Mahathir ignited large protests concerning the culture of bullying. Its only last year that students burnt effigies of Anwar Ibrahim in Kota Kinabalu.

However, it must be remembered that no matter which coalition wins on Saturday week, the ‘unity government will not be affected. That’s the aggregate, but underlying the federal coalition are some issues of long-term concern.

The way all the parties have landed on the ground in Sabah shows a split between UMNO and Pakatan Harapan. UMNO is running a completely different campaign to Pakatan Harapan. Its as if this is a testing ground for UMNO with a view to going alone in the upcoming Melaka and Johor state elections. PKR is particularly weak in Sabah currently holding only two seats. PKR was wiped out in the 2021 Melaka state election, and lost six seats in the 2022 Johor state election, today holding only one seat in the state assembly.

With talk of Khairy Jamaluddin returning to the UMNO fold, UMNO is clearly thinking ahead for the general election due in 2027.

UPKO leaving the national ‘unity coalition’ so quickly is an indicator of just how quickly the government can be abandoned. This sends a message for the next general election that no coalition can be assured of support from east Malaysia. East Malaysian support is ‘up for grabs’. The decision by UMNO, although UMNO has a long history in Sabah, to run alone is also a warning for the future that the current political status quo is far from anything permanent.

Things don’t look too promising for the peninsula-based parties. No one can expect a good performance from PN. They are hoping to win seats that UMNO is targeting. UMNO is hoping to return to the dominance it once enjoyed in Sabah, but that might be a dream just too far away. Potentially, any wipe-out of PKR would be disaster on October 29. PKR have parachuted in a number of locally prominent candidates, with some anger coming from the grassroots. If PKR stumbles, UMNO would be much more confident of going alone in the future.

From the federal point of view, it will be the UMNO-PH nexus that is created after the election that will be important. This will be a telling sign for the life expectancy of ‘unity coalition’ past GE16.



My coming court case on December 21st poses the question about when fair journalism becomes defamation. Every journalist should be concerned.


No need to sack aide over support letter, says Anwar


FMT:

No need to sack aide over support letter, says Anwar

4 hours ago
'Ainin Wan Salleh

The prime minister says any action against Shamsul Iskandar Akin should be based on the gravity of the offence and available evidence


Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said he has given a stern warning to his staff over the issuing of support letters, ‘and it should also serve as a lesson to others’. (PMO pic)



JOHANNESBURG: Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has defended his decision not to dismiss his political secretary, Shamsul Iskandar Akin, for issuing a letter of support for contractors involved in a hospital project.

Anwar, who is also the finance minister, said any action taken against Shamsul should be based on the gravity of the offence.

“Did it violate the law? Was the project approved based on his letter? No,” he told reporters on a flight en route to Johannesburg, South Africa.


He was responding to Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli’s statement that he should not merely reprimand, but sack Shamsul to show his commitment to fighting corruption.

New Straits Times had reported Anwar as telling the Dewan Rakyat on Tuesday that he had reprimanded his political secretary as government regulations did not permit the issuance of such support letters.



Anwar had said he could only remark “please review” even for letters addressed to him and contracts could be scrutinised but not given “automatic” support.

He had said this during Minister’s Question Time in response to Perikatan Nasional’s Pasir Mas MP, Ahmad Fadhli Shaari, who raised the issue of Anwar’s political secretary listing six contractors in a support letter for an unspecified hospital project.

Rafizi said Anwar’s answer lacked “oomph”, given that the letter in question came to light last year, and health minister Dzulkefly Ahmad had verified its authenticity.

He also urged Anwar to refer Shamsul to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to check when the letter was issued and if money had changed hands.

Anwar admitted that the letter did exist, but it was vaguely written and did not constitute an instruction to approve the suggested contractors.

He then said that Rafizi, who is the former economy minister, could be a bit hardline, “but even so, we must be consistent”.

“Don’t be the type who demands harsh action only against people we disagree with, and then go soft on those on our side,” he said.

“If you go after the small fries, you can be popular. But it doesn’t have the desired impact, especially when there is no compelling or incontrovertible evidence to justify a case against him (Shamsul).”


Anwar said he had encountered cases where staff overstepped their authority by issuing such support letters for projects.

“So, I have issued a stern warning to my staff, and it should also serve as a lesson to others,” he said.


Ambiga, Marina throw weight behind Indira's march to Bukit Aman










Ambiga, Marina throw weight behind Indira's march to Bukit Aman


G Vinod
Published: Nov 21, 2025 11:59 AM
Updated: 4:39 PM




Prominent rights activists Ambiga Sreenevasan and Marina Mahathir will join M Indira Gandhi's Justice March tomorrow, the Indira Gandhi Action Team (Ingat) said today.

Ingat chairperson Arun Dorasamy said Ambiga (above, left), a former Malaysian Bar president and Bersih chairperson, has consistently been at the forefront of various human rights and governance issues.

“Her presence is not only symbolic, it reinforces the fundamental principle that no authority is above the law, and that the fight for Prasana Diksa’s return is a fight grounded in constitutional justice, child rights, and moral duty.

“Having a figure of her calibre walk alongside Indira is a powerful reminder to the nation that the pursuit of justice must never be abandoned, no matter how long the struggle,” Arun said in a statement today.

Extending appreciation to Marina, Arun said her presence tomorrow affirms a simple but powerful truth - that no child should be separated from a loving parent, and no authority should stand above the law.


Ingat chairperson Arun Dorasamy


When contacted, Marina said: “I am just joining because, as a mother myself, I cannot imagine not being able to see my own child for so long.

“It is just heartless on the part of everyone who is keeping her away from her mother.”

The Justice March tomorrow is to protest the police’s repeated failure to retrieve Prasana, Indira’s daughter, from her Muslim convert father, Riduan Abdullah, despite multiple court orders instructing authorities to arrest him and return the girl.

Arun previously said protesters will march from the Sogo shopping centre, starting 10.30am, to the federal police headquarters in Bukit Aman, where Indira will hand over a teddy bear, a stroller, and other toys belonging to Prasana before she was abducted to Inspector-General of Police Khalid Ismail.

He had said that the march would not end until Khalid met with Indira, adding that all legal challenges against the government in the case would cease as soon as Prasana was returned to her mother.

Other prominent figures expected to join the march are Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M Kulasegaran and former law minister Zaid Ibrahim.

Unfulfilled mandate

Indira’s 16-year plight started in 2009, when her ex-husband, Riduan, then known as K Pathmanathan, unilaterally converted their children to Islam, abducted the then still nursing 11-month-old Prasana and disappeared.

The Ipoh High Court in 2013 overturned the three minors' conversion to Islam, ruling it to be against the principle of natural justice as the mother's consent was not sought.

M Indira Gandhi


The Ipoh High Court subsequently also granted Indira full custody, but in 2014, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court order directing the IGP to recover Prasana.

The High Court order gave Riduan a week to bring Prasana to Indira or be jailed. He defied the order, failing to carry it out by the deadline at noon on June 6, 2014.

In 2016, the Federal Court finally ordered the police to arrest Riduan and reunite Prasana with her mother - a mandate that remains unfulfilled to this day.


A lawyer's shame - Ambiga says justice system failed Indira










A lawyer's shame - Ambiga says justice system failed Indira


Published: Nov 21, 2025 2:13 PM
Updated: 5:19 PM



“Where else would I be?”

This was former Malaysian Bar president Ambiga Sreenevasan’s unwavering response when asked if she would join M Indira Gandhi’s protest march to Bukit Aman tomorrow.

Ambiga reflected on the harsh reality in Malaysia, where time is often expected to heal or erase the pain of those who suffer.

“But how do you forget a child? Who you know is being hidden away. Who our police (who are one of the best) just cannot seem to find. Who deserved to grow up with her loving mother and siblings,” she told Malaysiakini.

As a lawyer, Ambiga said she felt embarrassed that despite court orders and rulings at the highest level, “we as a civilised society cannot find the child and return her”.

Ambiga Sreenevasan


“In fact, there is no information! Snatched at 11 months old, this child is now 17, having gone through her growing years without her mother. Yes, I will be there (at the protest).

“Our system of justice has failed her,” she added.

‘I wouldn’t recognise her if she walked next to me’

In a recent interview with Malaysiakini, Indira reminisced about the few precious memories she holds of her long-lost daughter, admitting that it is almost impossible for her to imagine the young woman her child has now become.

“Even if she walked beside me tomorrow, I wouldn’t even recognise Prasana. I mean, to not be able to imagine your own child’s face, it is sad,” she said.

At tomorrow’s rally, dubbed “a mother’s final appeal to her nation’s conscience,” Indira will push her daughter’s stroller toward the police headquarters, intending to personally hand her daughter’s teddy bear to the inspector-general of police (IGP) - a poignant gesture carrying the hope that justice, though long delayed, might still be delivered.

Indira’s 16-year struggle began when her ex-husband, Riduan Abdullah (formerly K Pathmanathan), unilaterally converted their children to Islam, abducted Prasana, and disappeared.

In 2013, the Ipoh High Court overturned the conversion of the three minors, ruling it violated natural justice since Indira’s consent was not obtained. The court also granted her full custody.

Riduan Abdullah


However, in 2014, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court order directing the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) to recover Prasana. Riduan defied the order, missing the deadline of June 6, 2014.

In 2016, the Federal Court finally ordered the police to arrest Riduan and reunite Prasana with her mother - a mandate that remains unfulfilled.

Last month, a social media post reignited scrutiny over the police and Attorney-General’s Chambers’ (AGC) handling of the case by alleging that Indira’s ex-husband remains in Malaysia and has been benefiting from government assistance such as Budi95 and the Rahmah Necessities Aid (Sara).

Checks by Malaysiakini on the Budi95 and Sara platforms, using the MyKad number linked to Riduan, found that the account had fully utilised the one-off RM100 Sara cash aid and nearly 100 litres from the 300-litre Budi95 fuel subsidy quota.

A check on the Immigration Department’s travel status portal using the same IC number also showed “no restrictions” on his ability to travel abroad.


Niigata governor approves restart of world’s largest nuclear plant, moving Japan closer to post-Fukushima shift





Niigata governor approves restart of world’s largest nuclear plant, moving Japan closer to post-Fukushima shift



Tokyo Electric Power Co’s (Tepco) Kashiwazaki Kariwa nuclear power plant, which is the world’s biggest, is seen from the seaside in Kashiwazaki, November 12, 2012. — Reuters pic

Friday, 21 Nov 2025 3:30 PM MYT


TOKYO, Nov 21 — A Japanese regional governor said today he would allow a partial restart of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear power plant, the world’s biggest, as Japan tries to revive its nuclear sector and reduce fossil fuel imports.

Approval by Niigata Prefecture Governor Hideyo Hanazumi will remove the last major hurdle for plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) to go ahead with plans to restart one or two of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa’s biggest reactors.



Hanazumi will still need to seek the prefectural assembly’s vote of confidence on his decision during its regular session beginning on December 2.

A restart would be the first for Tepco since the March 2011 tsunami destroyed its Fukushima Daiichi power plant. It would also be a breakthrough for Japan, which after the disaster shut all 54 nuclear reactors in operation at the time, leaving it heavily reliant on fossil fuel imports vulnerable to production shocks and supply disruptions.


Niigata residents remain divided between those supporting the restart and those opposing it, Hanazumi said, adding that providing accurate information about safety measures should help to raise awareness among those living in the area.


Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who took office last month, has said she supports more nuclear relaunches to strengthen energy security and to address the cost of imported energy, which accounts for 60 per cent to 70 per cent of Japan’s electricity generation. Japan spent ¥10.7 trillion (RM282 billion) last year on imported liquefied natural gas and coal, a tenth of its total import costs.

“The restart ... is extremely important from the perspective of reducing ... electricity prices, and securing decarbonized power sources,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara said today.


Of the 54 reactors in operation pre-Fukushima, Japan has restarted 14 of the 33 that remain operable.

Tepco is planning to bring online units No. 6 and No. 7, which together can produce 2,710 megawatts of electricity, or about a third of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa’s total capacity of 8,212 MW. Tepco has said it plans to decommission some of the other five units at the facility.

In October, Tepco finished checks at the No. 6 reactor after fuel loading, saying at the time that it had confirmed the main systems required for reactor startup were operating properly.

Commodity analysts at Kpler have already lowered their estimates for LNG imports by Japan, the world’s second-biggest buyer after China, by three million metric tons to 63 million tons for next year on potential nuclear restarts.

In July, Kansai Electric Power, Japan’s top nuclear power operator, said it would begin conducting surveys to investigate building a reactor in western Japan that would be the first new unit since the Fukushima disaster.

Tepco shares closed 1.9 per cent down today, paring losses after Japan’s nuclear watchdog said yesterday that confidential documents were mishandled at the plant. That was better than a 2.4 per cent drop in the Nikkei index.

Tepco continues to pay compensation for the Fukushima Daiichi disaster of 2011, the world’s worst nuclear power accident since Chernobyl in 1986. — Reuters