Cornered like a dirty rat by the twin prongs of professionally derived facts, namely the Asli and UM reports, it has finally, grudgingly and reluctantly confessed, though still making resisting long claw marks on the sill of its house of lies.
During question session in the Dewan Rakyat (Parliament) yesterday, Deputy Finance Minister Dr Awang Adek Hussin admitted that bumi share ownership hit 36.64% but only as at Dec 31 last year (1st claw mark, perhaps implying when the 9MP was being formulated the bumi equity was only 18.9% - and why should we believe him!).
He also said 717,935 companies were registered with the Companies Commission last year, of which, only 172,568 (or 24%) were considered to be bumiputera-controlled.
He explained that a company with over 50.1 percent shares in bumi hands is deemed to be bumi-controlled (2nd claw mark, because when we talk about bumi equity, it’s not just bumi controlled companies or those with 50.1% bumi holdings – it’s the bumis’ sum total equity, whether of shares, assets or in kind, like if a bumi sells the shares for money)
His reply was in response to a question from Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah (BN-Gua Musang), who asked for the number of bumi-controlled companies (not including those controlled by Malay Trust Fund) listed on the Bursa Malaysia and the value of their shares.
Note that the admittance of the 36.64% did not include those controlled by Malay Trust Funds. If included, would the bumi equity be more than 45%, or even more?
Dr Awang continued to propagate the stubborn but indefensible mantra that the government’s methodology was the best, but of course without revealing it – and we can understand why he won’t (how to admit a lie or if we want to be kind, a monumental error?) but we certainly cannot accept nor condone the bullsh*t.
Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Ipoh Timor) raised the UM and Asli studies, asking for the deputy minister’s views on those.
Dr Awang dared not answer and thus in typical government parliamentary unaccountability, brushed those damn inconvenient ‘facts’ aside.
And his ‘scintillating’ ministerial response? He has not read the findings and is therefore unable to make a stand as to whether or not the two studies are acceptable.
What utter bull or what utter ministerial irresponsibility in not reading reports that challenge the governments questionable figures.
When the press queried him on the government’s methodology in the Parliament lobby later, Awang Adek again defended it, saying this had been prepared with advice from World Bank leaders and international scholars. Then why not reveal it? Was the advice related to the true outcome of that methodology, or was the 18.9% massaged?
When asked when the government would reveal its methodology as promised, he had the f**king nerve to aver that his (unrevealing) reply in the House was ‘a way of revealing the government’s methodology’.
WTF can you do with such a ministerial response or rather bullsh*t non-response?
Meanwhile Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Abdul Rahman Suliman, told reporters at the Parliament lobby later that his explanation in Parliament was in line with the government’s move to reveal the methodology but, again like Awang Adek, admitted (unashamedly) his statement to Parliament however represented only ‘part of the methodology’ which, dear readers, had definitely nothing revealing on the government so-called 'methodology'.
He did not provide any breakdown of figures. He said a detailed methodology will soon be discussed and finalised by the government. Why not now? What's being selected for hiding or cover-up?
As we can see, the government is in full damage control, attempting to bullsh*t its way out of its unmitigated indefensible lies.
Not surprisingly, Abdul Rahman criticised the UM research paper which asserted the 30% bumi equity ownership had been reached TEN YEARS AGO.
malaysiakini chart
However, it’s plain f**king obvious that either he didn't know or was attempting to bull his way through. Dr Fazilah’s calculations in 1997 did not include government-linked companies - see above chart. Fazilah had put the government-held ownership at 9.5 percent in 1997 under another category.
Again, another pathetic attempt at blatant fibbing by a minister. He merely confirmed what we knew all along, that the UMNO-led government had been lying through its rotten teeth.
I wonder how his disgraceful act of attack on Dr Fazilah's report, but which is inconvenient to the government's sinister manipulations will engender academic excellence in our universities that AAB has been calling for?
While we continue to argue over these lies, today, Intel, who has been one of the largest investor in Malaysia, announced it will increase its investment in Vietnam to US$1billion. How many people want to bet that come 2020, intel operation in Vietnam will be much much bigger than in Malaysia
ReplyDeletewonder if dr m pazilah will also stand by her report and also resign for it (if it's said to also said to be wrong)?
ReplyDeletefunny, they can't use the racial factor now that it's coming from one of their own and from the country's formerly premier public university at that.
The fact of the matter is that the UMNOputras think the NEP is for equalizing the races when in fact the original excuse was prevent marginalization of the Malay which is done long time ago. The truth it was argued from the start that the NEP would never achieve equality of the races.
ReplyDeleteNEP goal of equality is an illusion sold as political capital for UMNO much the same way communist and fascist sold their ideology. It will take an even longer time for NEPeology do die than communism but it will die to our own destruction and missed opportunities.
I always wonder whether UMNO's mentality is:
ReplyDelete1, Malays are INFERIOR, so they need all the help they can get to make them EQUAL as other races - the ultimate aim is EQUALITY; or
2, Malays are SUPERIOR as 'sons of the soil', so they need all the help they can get to make them TUAN of other races - the ultimate aim is Ketuanan Melayu; or
3, BOTH, hence double-speak??
Otherwise, I can't explain how come they keep complaining that they are 'weak', while at the same time argue that they must be 'on top' of everybody else.
Maybe they are using 'weak' as a way to become 'on top'? In other words, just because they cease to be weak one day (and hence equal with others) is not the end of the struggle - they have to fight until they become on top?
- Which is fine, so long as you fight like equals, not by STILL pretending to be weak.
And I won't be surprised if the coming UMNO GA will come up with a 'brand new' Malay Agenda which would conveniently take them completely out of the current shithole of disputed equity % and rejuvenate the party's support at the same time - 30% is no longer enough, we want 60% NOW, as the population is 60%!!!
(The 30% target was set in 1970, when Malays were less than 50% of the population!!! How's that as the NewEST Malay Agenda????)
When government shot down the research done by one of the leading university in Malaysia, what do you expect in our university rankings? It is not the think tank that leads the development of the country, it is bird brain that does it.
ReplyDeleteThe NEP has become a
ReplyDeleteNever Ending Policy
Never Ending Pain
Never Enough Plan
No Enquiry Please
what a lot of bull****
Y1
This is good news indeed, I knew Bumi can do it. Well at least we can stop bumi bashing in so many blog posting with this report.
ReplyDelete