Tuesday, August 08, 2017

Exploitation of Islam

It's a pity that the government will be dropping from its first parliamentary reading the proposed new Section 88A, which was intended to prevent unilateral conversion of minor children by any one parent from the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) (Amendment) Bill 2016.


Indira Gandhi

Without unilateral conversion ban, what reform is left? Hindu mom asks Putrajaya

The ulama and ultra conservative Islamic bloc might believe that amendment militates against matters Islamic, but I have to ask them: Does Allah swt want 'cradle snatching' to broaden the Islamic Ummah?

That's basically an insult to the dignity and honour of Islam!

That amendment if approved will place Islam on a much higher pedestal in the eyes of non-Muslims.

But alas, now it's still possible for sneaky scoundrels to misuse Islam to gain an upper hand over the non-Muslim spouse via a stealthy attack, namely by the scoundrel's preemptive and exploitative conversion to Islam, for his or her personal advantage and not for any sincere belief in Allah swt.

We know that many non-Malays have exploited the associated benefits of the Malay religion by converting to Islam, but principally for custody of children in an unhappy almost-failing marriage, inheritance of property via Islamic laws and gaining from the Bumiputera-Muslim programs.


and so are some 'bin Abdullahs' 

Such exploitative scoundrels must be curtailed or better, stopped. Why admit them to the fold of Islam?

15 comments:

  1. islam can be both peace n submission. when we observe how a muslim do his praying, we will find peace, even if we r not a muslim. however when islam mix with politics, some twist it as way of life, then it is solely abt submission. since some muslim can embrace thief, y not a scoundrel? u oso no problem with thief what.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. childish and out of thread but typical of an unhappy you

      Delete
    2. unlike u, i am honest. i never see u say anything good abt christianity, but keep on telling us how beautiful n harmony is islam, when both r basically from the same source. it seem u know islam very well, anyone dun follow yr version of islam is an insult to the beautiful islam? u think yr readers r as gullible as the "satisfy with arul explanation" horde kah? u n the pas under hadi dedak gang r abang adik la, full of pretense.

      Delete
    3. I am amazed by your ultra tangential style, from Islam to Arul, wakakaka

      Delete
    4. didn't one say imitation is the highest form of flattery? what i did is pale compare to how u link every little issue, no matter how distant n irrelevant, to mahathir.

      Delete
  2. This sounds like Alice through the Looking Glass, except you Are in the looking glass.

    Both the Indira Gandhi case and the stupid flip-flops over Section 88A,of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) (Amendment) Bill 2016 occurred / are occurring long after Mahathir left the building but you balik-balik keep trying to tie it to him.

    If you want to blame this on someone at a Prime Minister level, you should know who was/is the PM during both incidents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wasn't Mahathir the very one who gave the clerics excessive powers in 2002 by his unilateral declarations?

      Delete
    2. dia punya declarations tak laku la.

      Delete
  3. Any conversion to Islamic faith 'bukan kerana Allah dan kesedaran/keinsafan' should be curtailed. It is obvious. By the way Hadi has a Chinese daughter in law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. religion and religious beliefs should always be above race

      Delete
    2. To borrow someone's bloated egoistic claim of ultra tangential style;

      During the high of Nazi Germany, there were Nazi officers who helped to save Jews from persecution.

      So HOW the father behaves has zilch relationship with who's the daughter-in-law le!

      Samax2 吃饭不知米价!

      Just acting blur NOT to do the correct extrapolation....tsk..tsk one is wordsmith ulta jamban, the other zombie!

      Delete
    3. i dun think hadi, or in that matter any msia pm is truly racist, as in the supremacy context. racism now become a tool, a weapon n an approach. my point is this tool, weapon n approach would lead us to nowhere.

      Delete
    4. “非我族类其心必异,非我族者其性必恶”

      IS a natural tribalistic instinct of human.

      That's NOTHING wrong with such an exhibit of fear of unknown.

      It ONLY mould into the evilness of racism when that group fear is been manipulated by charismatic scoundrels into achieving selfish aims while waste-lying the 'outsiders'.

      So, say it AGAIN that hadi, or in that matter any msia pm is NOT truly racist, as in the supremacy context.

      How far can one's political-correctness pretend to cover le!!!

      Delete
    5. i always try to write base on feeling, whether right or wrong is another story. i give u one example, how some of us chinese look down on indian, in my true feeling, is kind of supremacy racism, mean to say, we believe some cant perform is due to their skin color. in a way what mahathir did is more likely a reverse racism wakaka.

      Delete
    6. first mayor of chinese-dominated georgetown was ds ramanathan. guess in which constituency had/has been the late karpal singh, his sons, kulasegaran, patto - chinese in malaysia do not look down on indians

      Delete