Wednesday, April 04, 2012

UMNO's Noah's Ark

Malaysiakini's Bersih 2.0: PSC report fails in five key areas reported:


Election reforms pressure group Bersih 2.0 is disappointed that the parliamentary select committee (PSC) on electoral reform has failed to address five key issues.


The five issues, Bersih 2.0 said, are:

  1. Manipulation of the electoral roll;
  2. The citizenship-for-votes scam in peninsula Malaysia;
  3. Enforcement of the Election Offences Act 1954 and enhancing the definition of election offences;
  4. A plan to stop ‘dirty politics’; and
  5. Inviting international observers.
In view of this, the Bersih 2.0 steering committee said it was “highly likely” that electoral fraud and other irregularities will continue unabated.


The EC represents the last hope, the Noah's Ark for an UMNO about to be swamped by another tsunami.


Tsunami 2.0 is in spite of Anwar Ibrahim's poor example of his undemocratic 916 and shameful frogological expedition to Taiwan and the piss-poor example of his party's questionable polling process.


UMNO has failed miserably to exploit Anwar's cakap ta'serupa bikin by moving on to higher moral grounds, but instead stepped deeper and deeper into its 25-year old cesspool.


Tsunami 2.0 is the people's aggravated grievance against UMNO's unrepentant excesses since March 2008, as witnessed by its selfish, avaricious and nation-damaging exploitation of race, religion and sheer Goebbels-ish lies to divide the rakyat.


UMNO's Ketuanan Melayu is not, never was, about protecting ordinary Melayu but the UMNO elite and their cronies (including non-Melayu cronies), to ensure and enable their continuing binge in the public coffers.


UMNO knows Tsunami 2.0, the great flood, is coming. Their last hope is the EC, their Noah's Ark.

41 comments:

  1. Hullo Kt, it's been a long time hearing from me, yeah.
    As usual, the noise comes after it has been passed in Parliament. Always after the fact.
    The opposition did not want to debate it though the Dewan Rakyat speaker invited them to do it.
    Same as Lynas issue. Invited to talk about it, but rebuffed it.
    Pakatan prefers to make a din outside to provoke their supporters.
    Najib is right in saying opposition likes prolonging of issues for capital gains. Never provide a solution!
    And yes KT, there will be tsunami that will drown Anwar and his cohorts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bersih 3 comes,Buttercup run to jungle.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh my God!

    Even in a completely unrelated matter which is so very important to highlight, you had to get a dig in at DSAI!

    Anyway, its a given that the EC is a rubber stamp for Barisan Najis. The problem with Malaysia is the BRitish parliamentary system is unsuitable for us now proven with a compliant EC! and a corrupt speaker.

    sunwayopal

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nothing wrong with the Westminster style of parliament. It's the lack of professioanlisn of the EC and other public services such as the police etc

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sunwayopal

    Nothing wrong with criticizing any leader, We put them in power.
    Even Tok Guru has come out with a fatwa that it's not a sin to condemn leaders.
    Or is it, you can criticize Barisan Najis and Najis. But we cannot touch oh-so-pure Anwar.
    Typical Anwaristas!

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's why we need the Monster here to take care of Butter Cup otherwise he will start talking cock with no rebuttal. Monster, where are you???

    ReplyDelete
  7. Buttercup must keep carrying Najib's balls.
    Monsterball comes, he balls shrink and run away.
    Meanwhile, we are producing good results and Monsterball must be delighted to keep quiet.
    He is our chosen Commander.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like to join Monsterball.
    He is funny lively and serious.
    His hot tempter, foul words inspire me to be brave.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Talk talk talk, discuss discuss discuss what is good bad and ugly for what?
    Lawan tetap Lawan, no more talk.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Masa sudah sampai.

    ReplyDelete
  11. koret koret koret
    lawan tetap lawan
    hidup Anwar hidup monsterball

    ReplyDelete
  12. Helloooo, Buttercup, welcome back. Aah, you seem to have brought in an extra pair of shoes and flung both at your adversaries! Way to go!! All talk, no action itu bosan lah. That's why the parliamentarians in Taiwan, South Korea and even India are so adorable. When talking gets them nowhere they let their swinging fists and flying feet do the talking. Which of course is wonderful - a veritable feast for the ears and the eyes.

    Now, when Monsterball gets back into the fray, things will start jumping again!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Buttercup is now giving sucking services only.
    His cup, Big Big bitten, need stitches and 5 weeks rest to heal.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You heard the Commander.
    Fuck you BUTTERCUP.

    ReplyDelete
  15. go suck and shut up...buttercup

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hellooo, Monsterball, I see you are back, too, right after I mentioned your name!

    As I welcomed back Buttercup, so also I should say to you - welcome back!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Buttercup,smelly cup, go jump into a river,drunk yourself,

    ReplyDelete
  18. Buttercup!!
    Open up, bend down and let ktee fuck you.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Tarok Butteercup kua kua.
    He is a racists.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Monsterball, stop commenting using so many nicks

    ReplyDelete
  21. Poor Buttercup, but I guess he deserves it being so stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  22. ANON 4.46pm, are you trying to insult all of us?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bloody motherfucker Anon 4.46PM, ghost insulting monty and all of us, with no proof.
    Big Big has more work to do.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Shithead Anon 4.46PM want some shit pour onto his head?
    Come come, bend down and get it from me.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes...fuck him Monsterball

    ReplyDelete
  26. Are you including me,shithead Anon 4.46PM?

    ReplyDelete
  27. This Anon 4,46PM is too much.

    ReplyDelete
  28. hi Anon 4.46PM
    i also anon like you
    i support Anwar and Monsterball
    also not real?
    what are you? GOD?

    ReplyDelete
  29. trial and error.''

    Smooth and fair

    This place brings back memories.

    It's yummy

    berkobar-koba

    Camera Phone LOL!

    Bijan knee shaking already...

    narts ecomer

    ReplyDelete
  30. Aiyoyo Monsterball, here we start again. Fuck those pro BN commentators as much as you want but please leave KTee out lah. If you push him against the wall he will ban you from here....how then? Without you, this Butter Cup will talk cock and laugh at you. we need you here to brighten up the comments section lah.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Buttercup said...

    Sunwayopal

    Nothing wrong with criticizing any leader, We put them in power.
    Even Tok Guru has come out with a fatwa that it's not a sin to condemn leaders.
    Or is it, you can criticize Barisan Najis and Najis. But we cannot touch oh-so-pure Anwar.
    Typical Anwaristas!



    I think the criticism of DSAI is totally out of context and so personal its ridiculous.

    if ktemoc was objective, he would have put in another para PERSONALLY lambasting Najis Razak also.

    So, why the almost deafening silence ?

    In a commentary totally about a different topic, suddenly DSAI appears.

    And even then his criticism is totally unjustified.

    sunwayopal

    ReplyDelete
  32. KT:

    You fail to understand those fellas' complaining about your digs at Anwar at every opportunity.

    It's getting irritating, not that Anwar is their idol.

    You don't seem to get over your Captain Ahab syndrome. It's over temple bells, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  33. I see Ktee deleted Monsterball defense from Anon 4.46P but allow Anon 4.46PM accusations on, as if the accusations are right.
    This is a shit blog.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Monsterball, you are getting schizoprenia. Stop trying to pretend being so many different people.

    ReplyDelete
  35. "I think the criticism of DSAI is totally out of context and so personal its ridiculous."

    "if ktemoc was objective, he would have put in another para PERSONALLY lambasting Najis Razak also".


    sunwayopal,

    Why out of context? His conduct is just as bad as UMNO's, but we shouldn't be surprised because he was from UMNO and still has UMNO ways - wasn't 916 precisely that?

    Put in another para lambasting Najib? What do you think the post is about?

    ReplyDelete
  36. The post was about UMNO, not about Najis Razak, as far as I am aware, i have never read anything personal about Najis Razak whereas DSAI's name crops up everywhere in every single topic at every single opportunity. Maybe you can point to me where you have lambasted Najis Razak on a personal basis. You seem to bring up every single instance when DSAI was a UMNO member what he did but you fail to bring up the very important point what Najis Razak when he was UMNO Youth head. You fail to bring up the point what Najis Razak is still doing TODAY and NOW but yet u delight in dredging up 20 year old events. People dont change is it?

    Let me ask you, your acts today is the same as your thinking 20 or 30 years ago? People change! You should highjlight idiots today in UMNO who is still the same as they were 30 years ago!

    Let me debate you know on your very frequent DSAI incident on 916 and your frequent putdowns of Hannah Yeoh.

    To me the 2 incidents are NOT similar. Ie the Perak illegal takeover and the 916.

    Only you in your absolute hatred of DSAI can label it the same.

    Point 1 - What is wrong with DSAI as a parlimentarian asking for a vote of no confidence in Parliament ? Is there anything wrong ?

    Point 2 - If there was no issue with such a vote and Badawi and Barisan Najis was secure, why even sweep up MPs and take them to Taiwan on a holiday at our expense ? Precisely because Badawi was unsure , precisely because he knew he was going to get a dagger into his back if he agreed to a no confidence vote. But likewise these Barisan Najis MPs wouldnt reveal their daggers unless they have 100% certainty they could kill Badawi.

    Point 3 - by doing the above, DSAI wasnt doing anything illegal, was the august House illegally distrubed, was the Speaker forcibly removed and replaced ? Was the Agong fait accompli in an illgeal act?

    Point 4 - Contrast that with Perak, do u know the number of illegal precedents set by UMNO in this illegal takeover?

    Point 5 - That UMNO bastard yeah i dont dispute he had the right to jump ship twice, go ahead, my issue is with all the subsequent illegal acts and ursurping of the Speakers powers in the Perak state assembly!

    Therein lies the big difference !

    So before you go knocking DSAI so personally get your facts right.


    sunwayopal

    ReplyDelete
  37. In case you dont understand the difference, what Barisan Najis and Najis Razak should have done in the Perak incident was to call a no confidence vote in the Assembly and thereafter vote in a new MB.

    Not do a illegal visit to the Sultan and make some side deal vis a vis Gamuda and thereafter take over the MB post illegally.

    That is the difference between 916 and the Perak takeover which you always equate to as the same.

    It never was!

    sunwayopal

    ReplyDelete
  38. " i have never read anything personal about Najis Razak whereas DSAI's name crops up everywhere in every single topic at every single opportunity. Maybe you can point to me where you have lambasted Najis Razak on a personal basis."

    Just one recent exmaple - "But in more recent times, we suspect that Dr M might have entertained some doubts as to Najib’s ‘loyalty’, not that Mr Zigzag has been particularly renowned for that quality."

    ReplyDelete
  39. "People change!"

    Has he?

    1994 - Sabah state government changed by his frogs

    2008 - he tried again with 30 frogs.

    Still subverting the ballot box.

    ReplyDelete
  40. KTemoc said...

    " i have never read anything personal about Najis Razak whereas DSAI's name crops up everywhere in every single topic at every single opportunity. Maybe you can point to me where you have lambasted Najis Razak on a personal basis."

    Just one recent exmaple - "But in more recent times, we suspect that Dr M might have entertained some doubts as to Najib’s ‘loyalty’, not that Mr Zigzag has been particularly renowned for that quality."

    8:05 PM, April 06, 2012


    u call this an advserse comment ?


    DOUBT about Najis Razak ???


    surely, u can do better man. Not trying to hard are we !





    sunwayopal

    ReplyDelete
  41. and since when has asking for a no confidence vote in Parliament called subverting the will of the rakyat ?

    what is wrong with that ? he went the proper way.

    Contrast that with what happened in Perak.

    You and your half past 6 analysis kept equating the 2 and u hammer Hannah Yeoh for pointing out it was different. It was different, dulu, kini dan selamanya.






    who in the first place doesnt want to pass a constituitional amendment to ban frogs?

    u can also thank Najis Razak and Barisan Najis for that.

    ReplyDelete