Thursday, October 09, 2025

Haj won't absolve sins of corruption, deputy IGP tells cadet officers










Haj won't absolve sins of corruption, deputy IGP tells cadet officers


G Vinod
Published: Oct 9, 2025 12:37 PM
Updated: 4:12 PM



Deputy Inspector-General of Police Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay has reminded his personnel that going for pilgrimage after indulging in corruption would not absolve them of their sins.

“You may remember me saying this before, when it comes to corruption, especially for Muslims, don’t think your sins of corruption will be absolved after going for haj or umrah.

“No such thing when it comes to corruption. Go ask your ustaz, the mufti. I have even asked the grand mufti of Al-Azhar (University)…no such thing.

“So, I remind you all again, go and seek forgiveness from 32.5 million Malaysians, one by one (if you have been involved in corruption),” he said during a convocation ceremony for cadet officers at the Police Training Centre.

He also reminded the cadets that going on a pilgrimage while indulging in corruption was nothing short of making a mockery of God’s laws.




“So, listen and make sure this message gets imbibed into your souls,” Ayob said, adding that the message is also meant for non-Muslim cadets.

“To me, there is no religion that asks its followers to become corrupt and abuse their powers.”

kt comments: ... except Judaism. which favoured:

(a) Jacob for cheating on his father and brother Esau,

(b) Judah for incestuous sex with his daughter-in-law Tamar,

(c) David for adultery with his general's wife, murdering that cuckolded general, his king and family, treason with the Philistine foe, etc

 

Lodge reports with IPCC, MACC

Ayob also urged new personnel not to be afraid to lodge reports against officers who abuse their power and indulge in corruption.

He acknowledged that working in the real world can be challenging, with some ending up with bad superiors.

However, Ayob said, unlike in the past, officers now have ample options to lodge complaints against errant colleagues, such as the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) and MACC.




“If you’re doubtful about making a complaint with the Police Integrity and Standard Compliance Department, lodge a report with the IPCC, that’s the best option apart from MACC.

“Don’t let it slide. If you feel desperate, take down my phone number and inform me directly,” Ayob added.

Ayob also warned that when he chairs the committee to investigate errant officers, firing as a punishment will be a priority.

“As long as I’m the deputy IGP, that’s my first option. No need to use any cables (for support).

“Use whatever cable you want, if I’m chairing it (the committee), I will sack (if officer is found to have committed wrongdoing). I will not compromise,” he added.


6 comments:

  1. Kaylee's hatred of Judaism is boundless.
    The story of David is a narrative of a highly capable and talented man who was also deeply flawed and subject to serious moral failures.
    Does the Judaism praise David's moral misconduct ? It does not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. David’s Rape of Bathsheba and Murder of Uriah (2 Samuel 11-12)
      Bible Commentary / Produced by TOW Project
      David
      People in power have been covering up instances of sexual abuse for millennia, but the Bible boldly exposes examples of abuse against Sarah, Hagar, Dinah, two Tamars, and Bathsheba, the subject of this passage. The abuse of Bathsheba seems the most shocking of all because it comes at the hands of none other than Jesus’ most famous ancestor, King David. The story is ancient, but the issue remains as timely as ever. In recent years a wave of sexual abuse stories spawned a #metoo movement that toppled titans from the realms of entertainment (Harvey Weinstein, Bill O’Reilly, Charlie Rose), politics (Al Franken, Patrick Meehan, John Conyers), business (Steve Wynn, Travis Kalanick), sports (Larry Nassar), music (R. Kelly), and religion (Bill Hybels, Andy Savage, Paige Patterson). These names are from the USA, but the problem is worldwide.

      The story is a familiar one. From his rooftop, David notices his attractive neighbor, Bathsheba, washing. He sends his men to take her back to the palace, he has sex with her, and she conceives. In an attempt to cover up the pregnancy, David recalls Bathsheba’s husband Uriah from the siege of Rabbah, but Uriah has too much integrity to sleep with his wife while the rest of the army and the ark are camping in tents. After David orchestrates Uriah’s death in battle, he assumes the disaster has been averted. But David doesn’t take God into account.

      Over the course of history, this encounter between David and Bathsheba has often been described as adultery, which implies mutual consent. However, as we examine the details, we see that it is actually sexual abuse of power, in other words, rape. Neither the text nor the context supports the conclusion that it was an affair between two consenting adults. People who think Bathsheba seduced David by bathing outside his window may not realize the Hebrew verb rachats, used for Bathsheba’s action here (2 Samuel 11:2), literally means “wash” which is how it is translated elsewhere in this narrative (2 Sam. 11:8; 12:20). There is no reason to assume that Bathsheba was naked, or that she was aware that the king, who should have been with his army, would have been watching from his rooftop like a peeping Tom (2 Sam. 11:1-2).

      (CONTINUED)

      Delete
    2. CONTINUED PT 2
      People who think that she agreed to come to the palace willingly do not understand that when an ancient ruler summoned a subject to the palace, the subject had no choice but to comply. (See Esther 2:14, 3:12, and 8:9 for example.) And David sends not one, but several messengers, to ensure Bathsheba’s compliance (2 Sam. 11:4). Remember, the only person who refuses to follow David’s directives in this story, Uriah, is killed (2 Sam. 11:14-18). The text does not say that Bathsheba realized she was being brought to the palace for sex with the king. More likely, she would have assumed she was summoned there to be informed of her husband’s death, which is essentially what happened later (2 Sam. 11:26-27).

      The text states the action as a one-way perpetration by David. “He lay with her,” not “they lay together” (2 Sam. 11:4). The language used here to describe their encounter suggests rape, not adultery. David “took” (laqach) Bathsheba and “lay” (shakav) with her. The verb shakav can mean merely sexual intercourse, but it is used in most of the rape incidents in the Hebrew Bible. The verbs laqach and shakav only appear together in contexts of rape (Genesis 34:2; 2 Sam. 12:11; 16:22).

      We cannot blame Bathsheba for acquiescing when conveyed into the chamber of a man possessing great power and a history of violence. As the narrative continues, every person reproaches David, and none Bathsheba. God blames David. “The thing that David had done displeased the Lord” (2 Sam. 11:27). The prophet Nathan indicts David by telling a parable in which a rich man (representing David) “takes” a precious sheep (Bathsheba) from a poor man (Uriah). After hearing Nathan’s parable, even David blames David. “The man who has done this deserves to die” (2 Sam. 12:5). Just in case it wasn’t already clear, Nathan responds, “You are the man!” (2 Sam. 12:7). According to the rape and adultery laws of Deuteronomy 22:22-29, if only the man deserves to die, what took place was not adultery, but rape.

      When we call this incident adultery or impugn Bathsheba’s actions, we are not only ignoring the text, but we are essentially blaming the victim. However, when we call it rape and focus on David’s actions, we not only take the text seriously, but we validate the stories of other victims of sexual abuse. Just as God saw what David did to Bathsheba, so God sees what perpetrators do to sexual abuse victims today.

      David’s crime was an abuse of power carried out in the form of sexual violation. As sovereign over Israel’s largest empire, David had arguably more power than any other Israelite in the Old Testament. Before David took the throne, he used his power to serve others, perhaps most notably the defenseless cities of Keilah and Ziklag (1 Samuel 23:1-14; 30:1-31), but with Bathsheba he abused his power first to serve his lust, and then to preserve his reputation.

      Delete
  2. These zionist myrmidons have only filtered grandmother's fairytale to wet their drugged sense of judaism & all related ancillary stories.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Which emperor had 3000 wives?
    The emperor with the most wives and concubines in Chinese history is traditionally believed to be Emperor Kangxi of the Qing Dynasty (r. 1661–1722). He is reputed to have had over 3,000 consorts at one point...

    Many regarded Emperor Ai as the most effusive homosexual emperor of the Han dynasty, although the Han Dynasty included many emperors that had male lovers....

    Emperor Xuanzong (reigned A.D. 713-756) had 40,000 concubines

    (WTF!!!!)

    Fu Deng, Emperor Gao of Former Qin, married his younger sister, Princess Dongping (东平公主) to Qifu Gangui, Prince of Western Qi...

    First-cousin marriage is allowed in Japan, though the incidence has declined in recent years. China prohibited first-cousin marriage only since 1981, although cross-cousin marriage was commonly practiced in China in the past in rural areas....

    Dr Li was BullyMao's personal doctor......pedophile???

    "Everywhere Mao went, he took his own hard wooden bed. It was enormous, and one side was about four inches higher than the other. Li was told that this was to prevent Mao falling out, but later he realised it had more to do with Mao’s sex life than his safety. Just like the emperors. Li reports, Mao had scores of concubines – nurses, dancers, travel attendants. He no longer slept with his wife, Jiang Qing; and when he was 67 he began to use Daoist sexual practices – which meant that he had to refrain from ejaculating so that his sexual energy, jing, would remain within his body and be converted into the vital energy, chi. The young women – they had to be young – also had to adopt special positions...."

    https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v17/n19/leslie-wilson/mao-s-pleasure

    Pedophile....?

    https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/the-dark-side-of-the-chinese-communist-leader-mao-zedong-the-pedophile-36663b77bab3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wakakakaka, mfer r u into Chinese roadside fairytales too?

      Ooop… font read too much of these Chinese tales, especially from those. mfering 台毒!

      Those zionists, megalomaniac western & similar tales ain't enough for yr mfering daily consumption?

      Delete