Saturday, October 30, 2010

Hated by Indra


Yesterday when I was in a barber shop waiting for my turn, I read bits of an old book lying on the magazine table. The barber gave it to me as he saw me so engrossed in its pages. It's a 1993 novel by Martin Booth titled ‘The Iron Tree’.

The story centred around an Irish Catholic priest in China of yonder days (1900). I came to the page which described the priest strolling along a road beside the river that flowed past Wuchow, the village he was stationed at. He saw Chinese coolies (labourers) hauling blocks of stones from a barge to the town. These were the lines I was drawn to:

The blocks were several feet square and each took two men with a substantial bamboo pole slung between their shoulders to lift it. These pairs of men struggled up the steep bank with the blocks, their breath coming in starved gasps by the time they reached the road, their horny bare feet kicking up dust as they staggered off into the town.

Pausing for some minutes, I watched the procession, wondering what life expectancy might be of these near-slaves. They could not be able to look forward to long lives and it was of no surprise to me the British had found it so easy to addict the Chinese to opium. Anyone with such an existence would want frequent release into a better world.


Opium has always been associated with the Chinese. But not many people, especially westerners, are aware that it was the British who forcefully brought large quantities of the drug (from its Indian colonies) into China, leading to two wars with China, appropriately called the Opium Wars, when the Chinese authorities attempted to bar the imports of the dangerous substance.

The Chinese lost both times and were heavily punished by the British with severe bank-breaking amounts of monetary compensation. Naturally British supplied opium continued flowing into China, and the rest is history.

The British Parliament, British merchants and the Royal Navy were collectively the world's original drug cartel.

But I return to Martin Booth’s most observant two sentences of “They could not be able to look forward to long lives and it was of no surprise to me the British had found it so easy to addict the Chinese to opium. Anyone with such an existence would want frequent release into a better world.”

Nearly five years ago I wrote The Toddy Syndrome where I stated:

Probably the most deprived and marginalised ethnic group in Malaysia, a land of bountiful plenty, is the Indian community. […]

The typically hardworking but unskilled Indian struggles at the lower scale of employment, earns enough to live from hand to mouth day to day, has no or little after-hours amenities, has many children as a result of their sole entertainment (not unlike Chinese farmers in remote rural areas), at the end of work dashes off to the local ‘pub’ for several tin mugs of watered toddy, gets himself pissed drunk to blank out his agonizing frustration, apprehension, worries, physical/mental pain, hopelessness and anger at his-fate-decided-by-the-gods, ... [...]

The evil toddy ... has become the straw to hang on for many socially-drowning Indians. Its devastating effect produces the syndrome, but the disease is hopelessness in an increasing competitive world that is rapidly leaving many Indian Malaysians behind.

Their children are born into immediate disadvantage. Their community is looked down upon. They are assigned ownership of Malaysian crimes which cannot be attributed to foreign migrant workers. They have become the debris, flotsam and garbage of Malaysian society.

Such is the unhappy lot of the chronic poor, impoverished people who would be exploited for the economic and sensual gratification of the ruling class and the rich.

These unfortunate people include Filipino or Indonesian maids in Malaysia and the Gulf countries, (once) poor Vietnamese in the old USSR and East Germany, underage Thai prostitutes, semi-naked Chinese women demeaned into cavorting with hundreds of snakes in glass cages in restaurants in southern China, illegal migrant prostitutes in Malaysia, and as for India, the world’s biggest democracy, one only needs to read Aravind Adiga’s Man Booker Prize winning book ‘The White Tiger’ to realize the evils of class-caste exploitations and persecutions in India.


We can bet 100% that when society has a class system, whether this was determined by religion as among Hindus and orthodox Jews (Cohanim, Leviim, and Israelites), or social strata as among the English and (earlier) Japanese, the culprit who developed and propagated the system would undoubtedly have come from an upper Brahmin class.

As French philosopher Claude Levi-Strauss said: “The only phenomenon with which writing has always been concomitant is the creation of cities and empires, that is the integration of large numbers of individuals into a political system, and their grading into castes or classes. It seems to have favored the exploitation of human beings rather than their enlightenment.”

But thousands of years of (religious or/and societal) indoctrination have convinced the lower class, despite their modern education, to accept their man-assigned positions. I recall an Indian friend, a Dalit, who lamented he couldn’t marry the woman he loved (and who loved him too) because she was from a higher caste.

I looked at him in shock and asked why in today’s world he and his sweetheart would even accept such social discrimination. All he did was to moan and groan and cry out in despair that it was impossible to break free from the shackles of the Hindu caste system. Of course with such an attitude, he didn’t marry her.

There is no greater evil than the caste-class system, especially one instituted by so-called religion:


Indra

He gained possession of the Sun and Horses, Indra obtained the Cow who feedeth many. Treasure of gold he won; he smote the Dasyus [dark skinned people], and gave protection to the Aryan color - Rig Veda III.34.9

Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates - Rig Veda IX.73.5


Related: Malaysia's Economic Pariahs?

13 comments:

  1. The opium consumption part are utter inaccurate.

    In fact, back in 1900 in China, "coolies",farmers, low income class CANNOT AFFORD opium!!The price is just forbidden! Forget about those Wong-Fei-Hong kungfu movies, it just exaggerate bullshit of a empire downfall due to opium.

    Those afford to take opium are GOVERNMENT OFFICER, MILITARY personnel and RICH family!

    Easy money allow them to enjoy "trendy opium lifestyle". During those period, government officer and army people ALSO COLLABORATOR of opium trade. That's how silver flow from China to Britain : NOT from the people pocket, but the GOVERNMENT pocket.



    So it is comparing apple to orange using the opium example!

    ReplyDelete
  2. trishaw pullers and stevedores took opium - they were hardly in the rich or even middle class

    ReplyDelete
  3. KTemoc :
    IMHO, minion consumption are too little to make economy different. It is the premium opium user that make the different.

    Take casino as example : profit come from rich family and corrupted government officer. Typical gambler are merely paying the maintenance.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The population of China was so great even in those days that by sheer volume the cheap opium dens were having the more significant turnover. Besides, most of China's masses were the poor - farmers, labourers, rickshaw pullers, peasants, fishermen - and the customers of the opium dens. Even in British Malaya, the opium addicts were mainly the poor. The rich addicts hardly constituted a significant consumer class.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is like the tobacco industry today--- most of the educated rich do not smoke to safeguard their health. The ignorant poor puffed like chimneys to their early graves.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Quote: "I looked at him in shock and asked why in today’s world he and his sweetheart would even accept such social discrimination. All he did was moan and groan and cry out in despair that it was impossible to break free from the shackles of the Hindu caste system."

    Have you noticed that once a system is in place and which is advantageous to a group of people, although it may have been agreed upon right at the outset that it (the system) would be temporary, when the time comes to rescind it the group of people benefitting from it would fight tooth and nail to keep it going indefinitely. In other words, the arrangement would become permanent and well-nigh impossible to dismantle. Human nature is like that - it happens all over the world. That's why there's this saying that "The heart of men (and women) is desperately wicked".

    ReplyDelete
  7. There are various grades of opium introduce by the Brits to China back then. Some are higher priced and some are of lower grade.
    The poorer addicts will add in tobacco plus other stuff.

    As not just the Brits brought in the opium. But it was the Brits who make it a big business back then. Yes, they were legal cartels.Those were the days.

    In modern Malaysia , we have groups defending their addiction too. The 30 % addictions.
    In India they have the caste system and it is still in practice.
    While here we have the Superbumi, bumi and pendatang caste.

    "when the time comes to rescind it the group of people benefitting from it would fight tooth and nail to keep it going indefinitely " - anon12:15 PM, October 31, 2010. Yes , very true.
    Greed is the word.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The caste system is the BEST system and a Indian/Vedic/Hindu CULTURAL TREASURE.

    The caste system however has not been applied properly that's all. I hope you are aware of the difference between the caste system in itself and the implementation there of.

    Don't insult a culture and people if you don't know better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I am a person of Indian decent. I guess I have right to criticize. Have you been to India? Have you seen what your "BEST" system done to the people? You must be one of the most insensitive person in this whole world. Slavery got abolished within 2 or 3 centuries. The attrocities against ordinary people of India continues for millenniums.

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anon of 7:42 AM, November 03, 2010, here's your caste system as written in the Vedas, about the prejudice against dark or swarthy skinned people:

    He gained possession of the Sun and Horses, Indra obtained the Cow who feedeth many. Treasure of gold he won; he smote the Dasyus [dark skinned people], and gave protection to the Aryan color - Rig Veda III.34.9

    Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the swarthy skin which Indra hates - Rig Veda IX.73.5

    ReplyDelete
  11. Are you yourself a racist who hates Indians and the Hindu religion?

    Dasyu, or Dark Ones, were hostile Vedic demons. Don't take the Rig Veda out of context 'bro'.

    ReplyDelete