In Klang, ustaz slapped with rape, sexual assault charges

In Klang, ustaz slapped with rape, sexual assault charges

Ustaz Fathi Naim was charged with seven counts of raping and one count each for sexually assaulting and committing unnatural sex on a teenage girl, who is now 14-years-old.

Tuesday, 29 Nov 2022 2:40 PM MYT


KLANG, Nov 29 — A preacher pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court here today to nine charges of committing rape, sexual assault and unnatural sex on a teenager between June 2021 and last February.

Muhammad Fathi Na'im Mazlam (rpt Mazlam), 30, who is also known as Ustaz Fathi Naim, made the plea before Judge Syafeera Mohd Said.


The man, who has three wives and eight children, was charged with seven counts of raping and one count each for sexually assaulting and committing unnatural sex on a teenage girl, who is now 14-years-old.

The offences were allegedly committed in a Toyota Vellfire car in front of a surau, a parking area of Dataran Eco World and in a hotel in the vicinity of Bandar Puncak Alam near here between June 2021 and February this year.


The charges for rape and sexual assault were framed under Section 376 (1) of the Penal Code and Section 14 (a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017, respectively, which provide imprisonment for up to 20 years and is also liable to whipping, if found guilty.


On the charge of committing unnatural sex, Muhammad Fathi Na'im was charged under Section 377CA of the Penal Code which carries imprisonment for up to 30 years and whipping, if found guilty.

He was allowed bail of RM40,000 with one surety for all the charges and also ordered to report himself at a police station once a month, as well as to not intimidate the victim and witnesses in the case.

The court fixed Jan 10 next year for mention. of the case.

The prosecution was represented by deputy public prosecutor Ku Hayati Ku Haron, who is also Selangor Prosecution director. She is assisted by deputy public prosecutors Aqharie Durranie and Nurul 'Izzati Mohamad.

Lawyer Samry Masri represented the accused. — Bernama

***

kt comments:

Early last year, 22 Feb 2021 exactly, I posted
MyGovernment says: Polygamy required by Islam due to husband’s “incredible sense of sexual desire” that the wife cannot fulfil, when and where we were advised by a furious Mukhriz that the MyGovernment website, which was a “single gateway to all government online services”, informed readers polygamy is required by Islam, among others, due to the husband’s “incredible sense of sexual desire” that the wife cannot fulfil.

Mukhriz criticised such [salacious?] info on polygamy on a government portal, saying it was among the reasons why Islam has been so misunderstood.

Perhaps the info on "the husband's incredible sense of sexual desire" was not incorrect after all, wakakaka.

Earlier, seven years ago, in March 2015, I reminded my readers that the then-Mufti of Kelantan, Mohamad Shukri Mohamad, had in 2006 (then as the deputy mufti of Kelantan) told Berita Harian that wives would be deemed to be unjust and abusive if they cannot satisfy their husbands' sexual needs.

Wakakaka, it seems it's always women who were/are to be blamed and bullied, even when used as a sexual tool.

Wakakaka again, abusive in sexual needs?


In his (note ‘his’ and not 'the') most 'brilliant' exposition of Islamic doctrines, he asserted that in a marriage, it's not always the wives who were abused as it could also happen to the husbands. He advised that Islamic laws protect both women and men.

He warned: "Thus wives who do not provide proper care for their husbands, including not fulfilling their sexual needs, can be considered as being unjust and abusive towards their husbands."

"These women can be charged under Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002, which provides for a fine of RM 1,000 or jail of up to six months or both upon conviction."

But he skipped the details, yup, by neglecting to elaborate on how the courts would determine any husband’s claims of his wife failing to satisfy his sexual needs as per, wakakaka, Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002.

As we know, some husbands may have excessive sexual needs, so the poor wives could be required to perform to super-human standards, you know, 'above and beyond' the call of duty.

Dahleeng, use a Kryptonite to 'soften' his super sex needs, wakakaka


If their wives cannot satisfy their super sexual needs, would those poor wives be still deemed as unjust and abusive as per, wakakaka again, Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002 by this mufti?

But truthfully, I would be very interested in how he would impartially gauge that a husband has attained sexual satisfaction in his legal act of consummation.

I've been informed though, that in the West it's supposedly measured by how loud the man (or woman) screams 'OH GOD', wakakaka again.



Poor Malaysian women.

And it seems SEX SEX SEX would always be in the picture if you were to read Malaysiakini's K'tan deputy MB admits error on 'unnatural sex'.

We gather from Kelantan's Deputy MB Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah that: "Some scholars argue that since wives belong to their husbands, their husbands can do as they like."

The wife belongs to the husband and he can do as he likes? Wow. Incidentally, he was referring to anal sex between the married couple.

And he added that this wife-as-a-chattel (mere property) comes from the differences of interpretation of the Quranic verse which states that "wives are tilths for their husbands", and therefore, they can approach their wives in any sexual manner they choose.

[kt note: tilth = cultivated land]

And on that, let me remind wives that the Mufti of Kelantan, Mohamad Shukri Mohamad had already warned that "... wives who do not provide proper care for their husbands, including not fulfilling their sexual needs, can be considered as being unjust and abusive towards their husbands."

"These women can be charged under Section 128 (1) of the Kelantan Islamic Law Enactment 2002, which provides for a fine of RM 1,000 or jail of up to six months or both upon conviction."

Yes, leave it to PAS - they have all angles covered, sexual angles, that is, wakakaka.