Showing posts sorted by date for query sour grape. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query sour grape. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Mahathir’s Sour Grapes over Anwar’s ASEAN Triumph





OPINION | Mahathir’s Sour Grapes over Anwar’s ASEAN Triumph


11 Nov 2025 • 1:30 PM MYT


TheRealNehruism
An award-winning Newswav creator, Bebas News columnist & ex-FMT columnist



Image credit: Harakah Daily


If you’ve been wondering whether Dr Mahathir Mohamad feels a tinge of envy watching Anwar Ibrahim take the international stage at the recent ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, you might not have to wonder too long. Some of the things Mahathir has been saying about ASEAN since that event seem to say it all.


To be blunt, Mahathir really has no reason to be talking about ASEAN anymore. At a time when even his views on Malaysia barely register where decisions are made, his sudden interest in regional affairs feels almost like someone who, after being refused a RM10 loan, decides to ask for RM100 instead.


So why this sudden fixation on ASEAN?


The answer may be simpler — and more human — than we think. Watching Anwar, his old adversary, chair ASEAN for two years and close it with a highly successful, well-received summit — not in the Putrajaya that Mahathir built, but in Kuala Lumpur under Anwar’s name — must sting.


Like the fox in the old fable, who dismissed the grapes it couldn’t reach as sour, Mahathir too seems to be doing some sour-grape philosophising of his own. Unable to bask in relevance, he’s reaching for the next best thing: trying to sound like the elder statesman that the world still listens to.


And so, out came his latest idea — that ASEAN should adopt a “common defence and security policy” to stand up to major powers like the US and China.


Unfortunately for him, experts wasted no time calling out the absurdity of that notion. According to a report by Free Malaysia Today, international relations and defence analysts described the proposal as “impossible” and “unrealistic.”



Dr Phar Kim Beng of IIUM noted that ASEAN’s member states are far too different in their political systems and priorities to ever form a NATO-style military pact. He pointed out that Mahathir was confusing the idea of strength in numbers with an actual defence alliance, and that the bloc’s diversity made such cooperation structurally unworkable.


Lam Choong Wah, a defence analyst from Universiti Malaya, went even further, saying ASEAN couldn’t even pretend to be neutral anymore. Some countries, he said, are clearly pro-US — like Singapore and the Philippines — while others, such as Cambodia, lean heavily toward China. In such a divided environment, talk of a “common defence policy” is little more than daydreaming.


Both experts agreed that ASEAN should instead focus on building internal trust and economic resilience, rather than chasing unrealistic military unity.



So what prompted Mahathir to suddenly play the regional defence philosopher?


Maybe his comments weren’t really about ASEAN at all. Maybe they were about Anwar.


Just a few days earlier, Mahathir had taken to Facebook to accuse the government of “handing over Malaysia’s independence” to the United States in exchange for trade benefits. He wrote that Malaysia was now “subjected to the dictates of the US,” claiming that the country had “surrendered its sovereignty” for “crumbs” in the form of tariff reliefs.


On the surface, it sounded patriotic — even righteous. But when viewed in the broader political context, it looked more like another attempt to paint Anwar’s government as weak, subservient, and unprincipled, while he, Mahathir, remained the unbowed nationalist of yesteryear.


The irony, of course, is that the man lecturing others about foreign control once courted Japanese investors, wooed foreign automakers, and thrived on global admiration during his own premiership. The problem isn’t that Mahathir has suddenly become anti-globalisation — it’s that the world has stopped listening, and that’s what hurts most.



His talk about ASEAN unity and national sovereignty is less a policy proposal than a form of political therapy — an aging titan trying to remind himself, and everyone else, that he still matters.


But history moves on.


While Anwar sits at the ASEAN table as a respected regional leader, Mahathir is left on the sidelines, delivering Facebook sermons that even his former admirers read out of nostalgia rather than conviction.


In the end, Mahathir’s problem isn’t with ASEAN, or even with Anwar’s policies. His real frustration is with time itself — a force no leader, no matter how long his shadow once was, can ever outmanoeuvre.


***




Mahathir a Nationalist???

Malaysia’s longest serving prime minister Mahathir Mohamad has called for “foreign interference” to help oust his corrupt­ion-tainted former protege, Najib Razak, and questioned Canberra’s silence over the multi-billion-dollar 1MDB scandal that has drawn in one of Australia’s biggest banks. The comments mark an extra­ordinary about-face for the famously nationalistic 91-year-old, memorably branded a “recal­citrant” by former prime minister Paul Keating for boycotting the inaugural 1993 APEC summit because he favoured an Asian caucus that excluded foreign (caucasian) nations.


Wakakaka



Podah Mamak


Friday, October 03, 2025

Rafizi Ramli: A singles player in a team sport — Terence Fernandez





Hailed as a reformist when he entered government, Rafizi Ramli now finds his credibility in question as critics say his tenure as Economy Minister was marked more by missed opportunities than meaningful delivery. - Scoop file pic, October 3, 2025
OPINION/ANALYSIS


Rafizi Ramli: A singles player in a team sport — Terence Fernandez


He commanded the imagination of millions but the former Economy Minister self destructed in a sea of disgruntlement and confusion



Terence Fernandez
Updated 14 hours ago
3 October, 2025
8:00 AM MYT


DATUK Seri Rafizi Ramli entered the Unity Government in 2022 with high expectations and a reputation as a policy master armed with data-driven approaches and a reformist zeal.

Positioned as Economy Minister, he was seen as a crucial player in Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s administration, particularly in areas of subsidy reform, cost of living and economic restructuring.

But two years later, the results — or lack thereof — tell a different story.

One of Rafizi’s most talked-about responsibilities was the subsidisation plan, particularly fuel subsidies.

Whilst politically sensitive but economically it is a necessary reform. Despite months of discussion, white papers, and public engagements, the plan never materialised under his leadership.

Of course, the Cabinet takes collective responsibility, but this was his KPI.

In the end, the Ministry of Finance had to eventually take over the rollout, implying that the Economy Ministry under Rafizi could not get it off the ground.

If Rafizi had the vision, where was the implementation? Did he lack the political will, the administrative machinery, or simply the execution strategy?

Several academics and observers chimed in when asked about this by Scoop. Their take was not surprising.

Schemes like SARA, BUDI95, and others were meant to help the lower-income groups navigate inflation and targeted subsidy transitions. These programs, led or co-announced by other ministries such as Finance and Domestic Trade, lacked the visible coordination or backing of the Economy Ministry during Rafizi’s time.

Rafizi’s absence in explaining these initiatives to the public led to confusion and further fueled public distrust.

Ironically, he is now criticising these very programmes after he resigned following his loss in the PKR Deputy Presidency race.

Rafizi’s recent criticisms of government decisions — particularly on subsidy mechanisms and economic aid — ring hollow when juxtaposed against his own underwhelming track record as a minister.

The embarrassment that is the RM85 million Central Database Hub (PADU) and the Inisiatif Pendapatan Rakyat (IPR), which came with a RM250 million allocation in Budget 2025, begs scrutiny.

No one questions Rafizi’s intelligence, his grasp of numbers, or his command of policy language. But with that brilliance comes responsibility.

When a former key minister becomes his own government’s most vocal critic, investors pay attention. And not in a good way.

Question to Rafizi: Where were you and what were you doing for the last two years?

If he had genuine disagreements with Cabinet direction, why not voice them then? Why only now? And risk being labelled a sour grape.

Rafizi had the rare combination of public trust, technical credibility, and a reformist brand. But as a minister, he was largely invisible during key economic moments.

In contrast, Anwar, who is also Finance Minister and others such as Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan, Minister of Investment, Trade and Industry Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz and Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali, took the lead on critical matters such as fiscal reforms, inflation control, and rakyat-focused aid programmes.

Rafizi’s lack of presence during floods, price hikes, and subsidy confusion periods left many wondering: Was he too focused on theory and not grounded in pragmatism?

Now, out of government and out of PKR’s upper leadership, Rafizi seems more interested in throwing potshots at former colleagues than reflecting on his own shortcomings. The bitterness of his tone reflects more of a wounded politician than a constructive voice for reform.

And in the end, his legacy as Economy Minister may be defined more by what wasn’t done than by what was. — October 3, 2025



Terence Fernandez is Editor in Chief of Big Boom Media, which publishes Scoop. He believes Rafizi has the goods to be an effective Minister and leader, but needs to grow up.

Thursday, January 16, 2025

'Sour Grape' Bye-Deen warns of dangerous ‘oligarchy’ in dark farewell speech

 

Biden warns of dangerous

‘oligarchy’ in dark farewell

speech

-

The outgoing president cautioned against a dangerous concentration of power among a few ultra-wealthy individuals.

5
Shares
Total Views: 273
Joe Biden
In his farewell message from the Oval Office, president Joe Biden urged Americans to ‘stand guard’ as Donald Trump returns for a second term. (AP pic)

WASHINGTON: 
US president Joe Biden urged Americans Wednesday to “stand guard” against a “dangerous” oligarchy forming under Donald Trump as he delivered a dark farewell address before stepping down next week.

In a primetime speech from the Oval Office at the end of his single term in office, the 82-year-old warned of an ultra-wealthy “tech industrial complex” that could gain unchecked power over the American people.

“Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in a US of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy,” the 82-year-old Democrat said.

“That’s a dangerous concentration of power in the hands of a very few ultra-wealthy people.”

Biden also lashed out at social media firms, with X owner and the world’s richest man Elon Musk set to play a key role in Trump’s incoming administration and Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg courting the Republican.

“Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation, enabling the abuse of power,” said Biden.

Biden also warned of the dangers of AI, saying that the US must take the “lead” over China on the transformative technology, and said that “powerful forces” threatened his climate achievements.

Signing off Trump returns for a second term on Jan 20, Biden told Americans: “Now it’s your turn to stand guard.”

Biden’s speech took a dark turn after he began by touting his legacy on the economy, healthcare, climate and tackling the gun violence that plagues the US.

The US’s oldest ever president has spent much of his final months in office trying to burnish his reputation before he is replaced by the bitter political rival he defeated in the 2020 election – a result Trump still disputes.

Biden’s efforts got a boost earlier Wednesday when Israel and Hamas agreed to a ceasefire and hostage release deal Biden said he’d ordered his administration to cooperate with Trump’s team to reach an accord.

‘Soul of America’

However, his legacy was badly damaged by his decision to run for a second term despite his age.

The Democrat was forced to drop out of the race last June after a disastrous debate against Trump, 78, who went on to a commanding victory over Biden’s vice president, Kamala Harris.

Polls show Biden remains an unpopular president. A CNN poll published Wednesday showed him with a 36% approval rating, remaining at the lowest of his term.

That puts him above Trump, who left office with a 34% approval rating, according to the American Presidency Project. The lowest in recent times was Richard Nixon with 24% while the highest was Bill Clinton with 66%, followed by Barack Obama with 59%.

In a letter previewing his remarks Biden took an implicit swipe at Trump earlier Wednesday, saying that he “ran for president because I believed that the soul of America was at stake.”

“And, that’s still the case,” Biden said in the letter.

Biden added in the letter that “I have given my heart and my soul to our nation” and that it had been the “privilege of my life to serve this nation for over 50 years.”

The White House also released a dossier of more than 100-pages setting out his achievements from the economy to healthcare and climate change.

In a farewell interview in the Washington Post published Wednesday, outgoing First Lady Jill Biden took a dig at the Democratic Party for pressing Biden to drop out.

“Let’s just say I was disappointed with how it unfolded,” she said.

Emotions ran high at the White House ahead of his speech.

Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre – part of a team that brought back regular media briefings after Trump ended them during his first term – fought back tears on her last appearance at the famous podium as she described the “honour of a lifetime”.

Thursday, June 29, 2023

“Muhyiddin is part of the problem, not the solution”


Focus Malaysia:


“Muhyiddin is part of the problem, not the solution”



By Prof Ramasamy Palanisamy


I DON’T expect Perikatan Nasional (PN) chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin to say anything worthwhile or good about the few-months-old unity government helmed by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.


He said recently that the unity government is hopeless, lacks direction and mostly importantly has no answer of the decline of the value of the ringgit, the state of the economy and the sad plight of the B40 community.

Muhyiddin also claimed that it was Anwar’s inability to address these – and other issues – that had given rise to instability in the country.


I don’t think that Anwar has downplayed the economic and financial problems of the country. He might be in power for a for few months, but he is certainly not resting on his laurels.

There is constant and relentless search for enduring political, economic and political stability.

Muhyiddin might criticise the Anwar administration but he must also realise at the same time that his PN coalition is the major source of instability in the present government.

Muhyiddin must also realise that he cannot hide his hands behind his back after throwing the stones at the unity government.

The infamous Sheraton Move not only dethroned the legitimate Pakatan Harapan government but provided propitious circumstances for the PN government to amass wealth under the cruel conditions the COVID-19 pandemic.

In fact, this illegal generation of wealth is presently subject to investigation by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

The PN government under Muhyiddin could not last for more than two years.

The subsequent government under Barisan Nasional (BN) merely compounded the economic and social problems of the country.

The problems faced by the unity government is not the doing of Anwar’s leadership; rather, it was the spillover from the previous PN and BN governments.

What Anwar is trying to do is to address the myriad economic and social problems left behind by the present “heroes” in the PN coalition headed by none other than Muhyiddin.

Anwar is not pretending that he has all the answers, but solutions have to be sought in the political process that is unfolding under difficult circumstances.

PN is certainly is not providing the stable circumstances for Anwar to address the economic and social woes of the country.

It was certainly not Anwar or the unity government that was responsible for the creation of the country’s whopping RM1.5 trillion debt.

It was not just Muhyiddin, but leaders in the past, among them Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob who are responsible for the country’s present debt.

Muhyiddin himself knows that the present instability – real or imagined – is caused by self-seeking politicians like himself.

If he can join hands with Mahathir to destabilise Anwar, then the public should know the kind of desperate leader he is.

The present unity government was not forged under ideal political climate but it was formed to ensure political stability and mostly importantly to thwart the grand designs of the PN coalition to constitute a government under dubious sworn affidavits.

In the final analysis, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had the final say as who will form the government after the last general elections.

Muhyiddin should not be the proverbial “sour grape” simply because the government had slipped away from PN’s grasps.

If there is instability in the country today, perhaps Muhyiddin can do his part and restrain the PN coalition from going berserk over race and religion.

Is he prepared to do this? PN is part of the problem and not the solution. – June 29, 2023



Prof Ramasamy Palanisamy is the DAP state assemblyman for Perai. He is also Deputy Chief Minister II of Penang.

Thursday, March 23, 2023

“Malaysia: Truly Asia” turns into Malaysia’s truly Michelle’s feud




“Malaysia: Truly Asia” turns into Malaysia’s truly Michelle’s feud

By Francis Yip





LATELY, I couldn’t help myself but to laugh at the feud between a journalist and an advertising man over Tan Sri Michelle Yeoh’s Oscar win. It is like watching a brawl between two little kids.

A celebrated Malaysian icon, Yeoh has been dragged into the quagmire of the famous “Malaysia: Truly Asia” advertising campaign. For those who are unaware, the advertising leader let his gloves off at the uncalled remarks of a journalist (-cum-actor) about Yeoh.

But in-between the bitter war of words, the ad man claimed the “Malaysia: Truly Asia” tagline was started by his agency. Of course, this didn’t bode well with the original creator of “Malaysia: Truly Asia” campaign, ISC International. Eventually, the agency released a media statement regarding this issue.

So, what’s next? Allow me to give my two cents of advice to all. Put the drama aside. Let us focus on the positive instead of nit-picking on Yeoh’s support to ex-premier Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the past. That is her right and choice – the same way you and I choose our support to party leaders whom we deem as worthy.


Michelle Yeoh in ‘Everything Everywhere All at Once’ which won her an Oscar (Pic credit: Everett)


Why let this became the spotlight? We should instead look at all the positive vibes Yeoh brought to us.

For instance, right after her Oscar win, the New York Times ran a letter written by Yeoh herself on the plight of war and earthquake victims? Yeoh is the United Nations (UN) Goodwill Ambassador and committed to helping the UN Development Programme to fight global poverty and inequality between men and women.

She didn’t forget her Malaysian roots and the country, Hong Kong, which gave her a leg up in her career. In fact, she constantly made donation to the Hong Kong Cancer Fund, amfAR, and even raised over US$2.75 mil for amfAR’s life-saving AIDS research programmes.

Her filial piety to her mother is undisputable and could be seen in her Oscar acceptance speech. If this is not enough to give her credits to who she is today, look at how many ribs and bones she needs to break before she broke the highest ceiling as the first Asian woman to win the Best Actress Oscar.

Forty years of sacrifice to the craft and her brilliant body of work is often praised by the best in show business.

So don’t be like a sour grape or that Ustaz who made a snide remark on Yeoh’s win, saying her win didn’t benefit Islam. Do we need such remark? Let us celebrate her Oscar win as an inspiration to us and as a Malaysian. If we have nothing good to say about her, say nothing at all. Peace to all.



Francis Yip is a fashionista and an award-winning writer and HRDF (Human Resource Development Fund)-accredited trainer. He is also the CEO of Franciswriter Dot Com and guest lecturer in The One Academy.


Friday, November 25, 2022

Don’t be a sour grape, Muhyiddin; Anwar walks into Putrajaya via the front door




Don’t be a sour grape, Muhyiddin; Anwar walks into Putrajaya via the front door




PERIKATAN Nasional (PN) chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin who reigned as Malaysia’s premier with the second shortest stint at 17 months – only to be beaten by caretaker prime minister (PM) Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob’s 14 – is seemingly reluctant to concede his defeat in the race to be Malaysia’s 10th PM.


As Indonesian President Joko Widodo became the first head of state to congratulate Pakatan Harapan (PH) chairman Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who ended his 24-year wait to helm Putrajaya, the Bersatu president stands tall as one of the few political leaders who is still questioning the validity of Anwar’s appointment.

Already outright derhaka (treacherous) for his action defies the order of Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah and the Council of Rulers for their selection of Anwar as the best man for the job, imagine the further disrespect demonstrated by the incumbent Pagoh MP by staging a media briefing which coincided with the swearing in ceremony at 5pm yesterday (Nov 24) to denounce Anwar’s validity as PM.




Even PN’s dominant partner, PAS – though short of congratulating Anwar for his premiership appointment – has endeavoured to move on by accepting that “whatever has happened, has happened and there must be a wisdom attached to it”.

“The important thing is that we be honest with the people, be patient, and remain steadfast (in our struggle),” penned PAS president Tan Sri Abdul Hadi Awang in his latest Facebook post. “We have tried our best. The onus is now on the PM to prove the actual support that he received.”

Even if PN is not part of Anwar’s unity government which features PH, Barisan Nasional (BN) and Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS), the very least Muhyiddin-led PN can do is to provide the check and balance machinery as a forceful opposition in the Dewan Rakyat when Parliament convenes on Dec 19.

Although he is still revered by Pagoh folks – very much the way Pekan’s born and bred towards incarcerated former PM Datuk Seri Najib Razak – Muhyiddin must realise that Malaysians tend to associate him as one of the masterminds/key defectors of the infamous Sheraton Move which toppled the 22-month-old PH Government in February 2020.

This has led to the stigma of “traitor” and “backdoor government” which is very difficult to be erased from the minds of Malaysians towards the 75-year-old eighth Malaysian PM.

If this is not bad enough, his flawed COVID-19 management has resulted in countless fatalities among Malaysians, many of whom could still be alive today.

“Malaysia (at the height of the COVID-19 health crisis) had the worst Health Minister in the world and Malaysia plunged from a country with a good record to a country with one of the worst records in the world in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic,” lambasted retired DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang who faulted Muhyiddin for the poor handling of the pandemic

Recall that the declaration of emergency during Muhyiddin’s administration on Jan 11, 2021 had not only failed to stem the spread of the pandemic in Malaysia but the number of cases actually spiked to 17,150 with daily COVID-19 deaths soared to 160 on Aug 1 that year being the last day of the COVID-19 emergency.

This is a stark contrast from the 2,232 new COVID-19 cases and four deaths on the day the emergency was declared.

Well, whether ‘caretaker’ Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Azhar Azizan Harun is right to describe Muhyiddn as an “overlooked reformist” is as good as anybody’s guess. – Nov 25, 2022

Thursday, March 24, 2022

It’s nothing personal, says Boo on call for Guan Eng to quit



It’s nothing personal, says Boo on call for Guan Eng to quit


Dr Boo Cheng Hau said he has been an ardent supporter of Lim Guan Eng for decades. (Facebook pic)


PETALING JAYA: Former Johor DAP chief Dr Boo Cheng Hau has reiterated his call for Lim Guan Eng to quit as party chairman pending disposal of his corruption cases in court, saying it is nothing personal.

He decried baseless attacks over his call, especially by party leaders, saying some were accusing him of being a sour grape over his loss at the recent party polls.

He said despite losing in the recent party polls, he would stick with DAP, just as he did in 2018 when he fell out of favour with DAP leaders after calling for those who had pending criminal charges not to contest in elections.

“This accusation (of not accepting the loss at the recent party polls) is absolutely absurd and baseless. Its purpose is to confuse the public and party members from the substance of the issues that I raised,” Boo said in a statement today.

He added that he had been an ardent supporter of Lim for decades, and even protested against his imprisonment for speaking up for the victim in a statutory rape case in the 1990s.

“Even though I had just joined DAP then, I stood up for him by organising many events, including ceramahs where police had a strong presence.”

Boo said, however, that the circumstances of the charge against Lim then was different to the graft charges he was facing now.

“As the most prominent leader in DAP, his corruption charges have adversely impacted DAP. That is why we have to face the public with honesty and rationality.

“Hence, I still insist that Lim should resign as chairman and free DAP from any adversity arising from his corruption charges,” he said.

Boo said it was the right thing to do for a leader charged with corruption to relinquish all posts until he cleared his reputation in court.

“This is in line with the party mentor’s (Lim Kit Siang) wish to achieve a world-class democracy,” he said.

Boo then challenged his critics and party leaders Teresa Kok, Lim Lip Eng and Howard Lee to refer him to the disciplinary committee if his statement had affected party interests and principles.

Saturday, October 09, 2021

Melaka Umno crisis stretches back to 2018, says insider

theVibes.com:

Melaka Umno crisis stretches back to 2018, says insider

Datuk Seri Idris Haron reportedly discontented by more than one decision by state leadership since GE14


Recently sacked by Umno for his role in the collapse of the Melaka government, Datuk Seri Idris Haron (pic) is said to be frustrated that he has been overlooked for several key appointments in the state, says party veteran Datuk Seri Kamal Amir Kamal Hijaz. – Bernama pic, October 9, 2021

KUALA LUMPUR – It appears the crisis within the Melaka Umno ranks, which led to the recent collapse of the state government, can be traced back to 2018 when the party held its polls, according to an insider.

Party veteran Datuk Seri Kamal Amir Kamal Hijaz said Datuk Seri Idris Haron, who was sacked by Umno earlier this week for his role in the crisis, was discontented by a number of decisions made by the leadership since the election.

Chiefly, Idris was supposedly frustrated that he was overlooked for a couple of key appointments in the state.

Kamal Amir said the first incident occurred in July 2018, when Umno president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi – then freshly elected – appointed Datuk Seri Ab Rauf Yusoh to head Melaka Umno, replacing Idris.

“Idris wanted to keep his position as state liaison chief, so he was not satisfied when he wasn’t given the role,” he said today.

“But it has been Umno’s convention to appoint the state chairman from among division leaders. Idris, unfortunately, failed to defend his Tangga Batu division chief post.”

Idris’ defeat was among the biggest shocks during the Umno polls in June 2018, although he did successfully defend his Sg Udang seat during the general election a month earlier.

There have been speculations that money politics were involved to ensure Umno delegates did not vote for Idris for the Tangga Batu division chief position, with a rumour of a falling-out between him and Zahid swirling back then.

The transition of the Melaka government in March last year following the infamous Sheraton Move, which also saw a change in federal administration, further aggravated the tussle.

Kamal Amir said then, Idris, a former Melaka chief minister himself, was again left frustrated after the responsibility of leading the state was given to Datuk Seri Sulaiman Md Ali.

Rauf, while he is the state Umno chairman and Tangga Batu division chief, is not an assemblyman, so he can’t be the chief minister. So, the position was instead given to Sulaiman, who is the secretary in Rauf’s Tangga Batu division. That didn’t please Idris one bit, and this led to the crisis we are seeing today. But in terms of party hierarchy, Sulaiman deserves the chief ministership more because at least he holds the position of division secretary.”

The Melaka Legislative Assembly was dissolved effective Monday after Idris led three other assemblymen to withdraw their support for Sulaiman, citing a loss of confidence over his handling of the government.

Idris and another Umno lawmaker – Datuk Nor Azman Hassan – were swiftly sacked by the party for their actions.

Rauf should take responsibility, too

However, Kamal Amir believes the two former Melaka reps should not be the only ones receiving their marching orders from the party, and that Rauf should similarly take the blame.

“First of all, I think the decision to announce the dissolution of the state assembly was done too hastily. Rauf, as Umno liaison chief, should be responsible.”

“He also overstepped his boundaries when he announced the dissolution. This should only be made by the chief minister or the governor.

“Finally, Rauf had been meeting Melaka DAP lawmakers to get their support when the crisis was first brewing in the state. So, I feel he deserves disciplinary action, too.”

Regardless, Kamal Amir said Idris’ decision to pull out his support for the state government could have been avoided had he sought the advice of Umno’s top leadership.

When pointed out that Idris had claimed that all channels within Umno had been blocked for him, Kamal Amir said he could still have aired his grievances through the media.

“Don’t be a sour grape. Whatever he said, his action (of withdrawing support for the chief minister) can be considered as a betrayal to the party, and so were Rauf’s actions.” – The Vibes, October 9, 2021


Wednesday, June 23, 2021

“Sour grape” Tajuddin

Focus Malaysia:

“Sour grape” Tajuddin should focus on the bigger picture!



You would think that by now Pasir Salak MP Datuk Seri Tajuddin Abdul Rahman would have learned to let sleeping dogs lie, especially when it comes to the two-train collision incident and his embarrassing gaffe that had let to his sacking as the chairperson of Prasarana Malaysia Bhd.

Alas, no. The drama continues, with Tajuddin recently dropping the ‘bombshell’ that he is planning to take legal action against those who have ‘tarnished his reputation’ in the aftermath of the incident.

He bemoaned that he had been humiliated all over Malaysia as an unqualified, insensitive, racist figure who does not follow standard operating procedures (SOPs), and that everything was a hit against him to the point that some were willing to petition for his resignation.

But someone needs to get his priorities in order.

Instead of going on and on about his damaged reputation and threatening legal recourse against the people who had, well, ruined him, Tajuddin should remember that he is still an MP and that he represents the voice of the rakyat, who had voted him into that position.

Shouldn’t more effort be put into helping the people in his constituency to manoeuvre their ways through the pandemic? There are more things to worry about than his bruised ego, that’s for sure!

There have been plenty of news lately about MPs who have gone into the field and taken the hands-on approach to help their people.

They have partaken in initiatives to hand out cash aids, food baskets, groceries, and even laptops to the B40 group of people, and maybe it’s time that Tajuddin takes a leaf out of their book and focus more on the people’s welfare.

After all, he really has got nobody to blame but himself for his fall from grace, and the sooner he comes to that conclusion, the better. – June 23, 2021

Monday, March 18, 2013

GE-13 - snakes galore

Kacang ready? Fried chicken wings ready? F&N ready? Then sit down, relax and read. It's one of kaytee's tng k'ooi (chong hei, long winded) post, wakakaka.



There is a terrible so-called joke in Malaysia of a blatantly racist nature that has been rendered for decades, openly in earlier years but more restrictively in recent ones.

It's about a snake and a person of a particular race, with the thrust of the so-called joke on the alleged treacherous character of the race of the person, and not so much the person per se, hence it should be recognized for its blatant racism.

The so-called joke would only be a joke among the teller and the selected listener (both could be of Race X or Race Y, or one of Race X and the other Race Y), usually with the story told in the absence of the victimized race (Race Z), but sometimes as an in-your-face insult deliberately in the presence of a person or persons of Race Z. It reeks of damning blind prejudice, one of a sweeping nature, without any shred of evidence as to its justification or veracity, as all racist insults or jokes would be.

The racist insult would usually be posed as a rhetorical question (meaning no answer is required from the listener as the answer is implicit in the question) asking: What does one do when one sees a poisonous snake and a person belonging to Race Z?

I came to hear of this (let's not pretend it's a joke - it's bloody not - but just a) racist demon-ization or insult in KL where I first started working after school. Now, could this be because Penangites in my days weren't aware of or didn't favour this particular racist demon-ization? Well, I don't know.

Additionally, in Chinese culture the snake is not viewed in the same way as the Judeo-Christian religions see it as a symbol of evil, treachery, wickedness, slyness or untrustworthiness.



And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou [art] cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel - Genesis 3:14-15 (KJV)


But to the Chinese, the snake has been perceived as a creature of wisdom, with people born in the Chinese year of the Snake believed to have the potential to be great thinkers as well as endowed with wisdom and sagacity.


Some famous people born in the Snake year were Kang Xi of the Qing Dynasty, who ascended to the Chinese throne when he was 7 years old and died in 1722 after ruling China for 61 years, making him the longest reigning monarch in Chinese history, and Abraham Lincoln, Mohandas Mahatma Gandhi, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Alfred Nobel, and Chou En Lai.


Sob sob, no, kaytee wasn't born in the year of the snake.

As a kid, I recall my mum and lady friends talking about the Year of the Fire Snake in 1977(?) as a wonderful year for girls to be born, as she would be beautiful, charming and clever, and would make a lovely, wise and good wife like Bai Suzhen, the immortalized Madam White Snake of Hangzhou in the 7th Century. Since then I have been seeking a sweetie born in 1977, wakakaka.


Madam White Snake (Bai Suzhen) in the battle with Fahai

My mum's belief was not so unusual as I read somewhere that in Japan (which borrowed or adopted Chinese culture and folk beliefs and therefore the Chinese would share many same cultural beliefs), Japanese paying a woman a compliment on her beauty would say: "My dear, you are a real snake".

Now, that's not the sort of sweet nothing one could whisper to a Western woman. The equivalent in modern western language should be "My dear, you are real foxy!", but which in turn would be an insult to Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Vietnamese women implying they're huli jing (vixen demons) thus evil, lecherous and demonic, wakakaka. Yes, a clash of civilizations!

Apparently, those born in the Snake year are not people who can be easily ignored - wakakaka, we'll come to this aspect shortly. They possess an irresistible personality which has been described by some Chinese astrologers as charmingly 'bewitching' or 'beguiling'. Snake people (male and female) are reputed to have an insight on their sweeties' desires, and known as experts in the art of seduction gasp.

So back to my post topic - Thus I doubt the racism we mentioned at the beginning would have its origin among Chinese. But that doesn't mean it was not from Chinese MALAYSIANS. After all we Malaysians of all races are among the world's most lamentably vile, vitriolic and vicious racists. I believe the 'snaky' racist story or insult originated in Malaya but definitely not from Race Z, wakakaka. It's likely to have been coined by either Race X or Race Y.

In true life ophidian stories (of Malaysian origin), I read about three cases of snake versus man, with snake winning one (but losing in the end), man winning one, and a draw.

The first was a Chinese bloke who went to her betrothed's house (in the boondocks) to discuss wedding arrangements. While there, he nipped off to the back for a quick dump (or so he thought), but then didn't return. After the alarm was raised and a hastily assembled search party went looking for our missing future bridegroom he was found almost completely swallowed by a huge python (just his legs sticking out of snake's mouth). Unfortunately for him, he must have encountered the hungry snake while on his way to the outdoor WC. Naturally the python was massacred.

The second was a Malay rubber tapper who like Ah Chong above was attacked by (also) a hungry python who had serious ambitions about lunch. Pak Cik struggled with the coiling reptile and was about to lose the battle when a nearby Mak Cik (incidentally his Mak Cik), having heard his cries, came to his aid with a machete. When Mak Cik got mad (or frightened for her man) 'twas no match lah. Snake inevitably was sashimi-ed by her Zatochi-ish swirling whirlwind of parang slashes.



The two snakes above were boa constrictors, better known as the infamous and most dangerous Malayan reticulated pythons which would sneak up silently or drop suddenly from above on their victims and constrict them to death by asphyxiation rather than the incorrect belief of the constrictions crushing their bodies, bones and all.

Perhaps this may explain why I titled one of my previous posts PAS - from Progressive to Pythonic, suggesting death of secular democracy and its freedom by a sneaky silent and sinister hudud-ish constrictions, asphyxiating secular Constitutional rights and non-Malay cultural practices and traditions like the saucy koe-tai, wakakaka.


koe-tai, wakakaka

Third case was also a Pak Cik who was bitten by a snake of unknown species. Pak Cik chased snake who wisely disappeared. Newspaper reported Pak Cik swearing eternal enmity with snake and vowing to get the slithery sneaky snaky one sooner or later. I wonder what would have been the outcome of that vowed vendetta?

In Penang Hokkien, the word for snake is chua, wakakaka ...

... which brings us after my tng k'ooi (chong hei) meandering above to two Chua's, namely our once favourite martyr-wannabe but now PKR-snaky Tian Chua and also PKR-snaky Chua JM.

Please note, as they're Chinese, their 'snaky' attributes should be viewed favourably as positive values of their character, like those of Abraham Lincoln or Mohandas Mahatma Gandhi, wakakaka.

In a previous post PKR and its arrogant tokong I wrote:

The truth is that PKR (if we leave out the PRM component) has been KeADILan has been UMNO. It undeniably possesses UMNO genes and characteristics but it claims to be multi-racial, a claim somewhat discredited by Anwar Ibrahim's poor treatment of many of its erstwhile Indian members who left in droves - now, if they hadn't, would Azmin Ali have a chance of becoming party deputy president and eventually party president?

So while the ex-UMNO members represent the core of PKR and dominate party policies and decision making, and precisely because of all these, the nons want so desperately to demonstrate their relevance in the party.

And, hey hey hey, there's the PKR Chinese faction, with its unspoken faction leadership reputed to have been assumed by Tian Chua.

Tian Chua is of course not his birth/legal name, which is Chua Tian Chang. It's obvious he has clung on to his Aussie-given name.


Western nations have this (culturally) bad habit of westernizing Chinese names by relegating the Chinese surname to being the last name (where the western surname stands), thus Chua Tian Chang became Tian Chang Chua, and under the Western-Christian naming concept, which has First name (Personal or as Malaysians know it, Christian name), then Middle name, and finally Last name (or Surname), Tian was believed to be his 'First' name, thus Tian Chua, not unlike Elvis Presley from Elvis (1st name) Aaron (Middle name) Presley (last name) wakakaka.

Hmmm, I wonder what his parents or siblings call him? Probably Chai or Chang.

For more of Australian (western) mangling of Chinese names, please read my post What's in a name! wakakaka.


And I wonder what role/status former MCA man Chua Jui Meng has in PKR, and what threat he poses to the current leadership of Tian Chua? But sorry, thus has to be another story.

[for CJM, see further down]

Anyway, long before the current 'Lim GE is an arrogant and cocky tokong' brouhaha, courtesy of PKR's Mansor Othman wakakaka, Tian Chua had been well aware that his Heavenly Snake faction in PKR might not have a role at all, or at best only a token one, if Anwar Ibrahim were to see DAP as the Pakatan component to be given responsibility for Chinese and Indian majority constituencies.

Tian Chua's fear has now crystallized into reality and thus become a current contentious issue within PKR, as reported in the Malaysia Chronicle’s MUTINY IN PKR: Anwar under fire for "betraying" members over seats. I'll discuss this further in a while.

Oh, BTW, I was told by a friend that Tian Chua has mucho influence in Malaysian Chronicle, wakakaka.

Thus, prior to 2008, in order to prevent such a terrifying Pakatan status quo (of Anwar accepting DAP as the Pakatan component party to be given responsibility for Chinese and Indian majority constituencies) from setting in to the disadvantage of the Heavenly Snake faction, he and his cohorts had the treacherous habit of making pre-emptive strikes against DAP in seat allocations, by making unilateral media announcements of seat allocations for Pakatan (not PKR) which strangely, if you believe in coincidences wakakaka, usually favoured PKR.

Of course those 'unilateral' announcements meant that DAP leaders would, after reading the morning news, invariably exclaim 'WTF!' wakakaka.

Alas, despite all its pre-emptive strikes, the general success (or lack of) by PKR in elections has been noticeably inferior to DAP , especially in Sarawak, and coupled with the avalanche-like dominance of DAP in Penang DUN, have dampened their (Chinese) members' confidence severely, thus it was hardly surprising these PKR members in Penang desperately sought Mansor Othman's assurances that he would not relinquish any of PKR's seats allocated in 2008, even the ones they lost, to DAP.

The Chinese PKR faction’s fears have been realized today, following news of Anwar's agreement with DAP that Karpal Singh's party will contest in the federal seats of Bentong (Pahang) and Gelang Patah (Johor).


The latter constituency was eyed by Chua Jui Meng, a born-again Christian who had shed off his MCA skin (ecdysis, wakakaka) to be born again as a PKR VP. But he wants a seat to get back into the game just in case Pakatan wins GE-13, and he thought his ticket into parliament and a possible ministerial position (Health? wakakaka) was to be Gelang Patah.

In an earlier post Treachery in Johor? my hero Bhai Karpal said what I've been saying all along about Chua Jui Meng (CJM) - see The Malaysian Insider's Karpal says Jui Meng’s intentions ‘suspect’ in Johor DAP-PKR spat.

Chua JM had a tussle with DAP Johor chief, Dr Boo Cheng Hau, precisely because of Gelang Patah. And not only that but Dr Boo had accused Chua JM of organizing an underground campaign against the DAP in Johor.

Alamak, I am beginning to see Tian Chua-ness in him. Maybe both are snakes of the Eden rather than Hangzhou variety, wakakaka.

For that, Bhai mauled Chua JM badly as he roared: “The credibility of Chua Jui Meng is suspect. His long sojourn in the MCA and by extension in the Barisan Nasional (BN), his unsuccessful attempt in 2004 at the MCA presidency and his obvious overzealous enthusiasm to regain a seat in Parliament certainly exposes a credibility problem which may appear to consume the better part of his intellect.” 

Ouch and bloody ouch!


The Malaysian Insider reported: ... an unimpressed Karpal told Chua that a politician who “deserts his own political mother” could not be regarded with approval or pride.

He said that if Dr Boo’s allegation that Chua has been the “black hand” behind a campaign against DAP in Johor were true, the latter must be checked in his tracks as soon as possible.

“An in-depth inquiry ought to be launched to determine who are behind the ‘vicious anonymous attacks’ against the DAP and also determine the ‘black hand’ behind these attacks,” Karpal said.

“The assertion by Dr Boo cannot be dismissed out of hand in the interests of the Pakatan Rakyat (PR). 

In riling the Johor DAP, perhaps Chua JM could have misread Anwar's appointment of him as the head of PKR’s campaign in Johor to be the head of Pakatan's campaign in Johor, wakakaka, thus believing he could ride roughshod over Dr Boo. Instead he had a rocket up his ....., wakakaka.


Don't you think he and Azmin Ali share similar mistaken belief in over-fantasizing their party positions as Pakatan positions, wakakaka - thunderous applause please, wakakaka again.

In another post Fixed deposits? What interests? I wrote of Chua JM as follows:

I am reminded he was once in MCA, and while we shouldn't hold that against him as we shouldn't hold an UMNO past against Anwar, there are conditions for excusing his MCA background, equally as there would be for Anwar Ibrahim's UMNO lamentable track record.

For Chua JM, his move to Pakatan would have been more credible (like Zaid Ibrahim's) if he had left when he was still in power, such as in a party or/and ministerial position, thus indicating his preparedness to sacrifice his power, position and privilege because of his repentance in being a part of an ineffectual MCA leadership or recognizing the BN's general poor performance in governance, transparency and accountability.

He only joined PKR after he lost his bid to be a deputy president of MCA, very much like another sour grape, Anwar Ibrahim, who crooned reformasi only after he was kicked out of UMNO but not while he was in that party for 16 years, ...

... unlike Zaid Ibrahim who voluntarily resigned from his ministerial post under the AAB government to leave UMNO so as to come over to Pakatan.

Remember I had very recently wrote of Anwar as someone so obsessed with the PM-ship that he would do anything, repeat 'anything', to get that position. Ignoring other methods, the most obvious path is to win GE-13.

I suspect and I believe I won't be too far off, that Anwar would have reckoned the DAP brand rather than PKR symbol is more likely to win in some federal seats that were eyed by the Heavenly Snake (Chinese) faction in PKR as their due rights or rewards. Thus Anwar has agreed to DAP contesting in those seats as a more assured prospect to his chances of becoming PM.

Touch luck for the PKR Chinese, coz' Anwar has to look after numero uno, wakakaka.

Is it then any wonder that the Malaysia Chronicle, in sympathy wakakaka with the PKR Heavenly Snake faction, reported:

Disgruntlement within PKR, simmering for months now, has erupted over party adviser Anwar Ibrahim's alleged betrayal of "long-standing" members, dropping them after having indicated they would be selected to contest at the coming general election.

That is what some upset PKR members are claiming. Their complaints and views if not treated with respect can cause a really serious rift in the PKR party and derail its recent resurgence and return to the top spot in the Pakatan Rakyat hierarchy.

"This is a most unpleasant situation with racial overtones. Not all who have been dropped are Chinese but most are Chinese. The Malays in PKR are now also very concerned. Who will be next?" a PKR insider told Malaysia Chronicle on strict conditions of anonymity.

Dear PKR Malay members, don't worry lah about the suggestion that Malays in PKR would be threatened by Anwar's Nalla-fication (wakakaka) and Gobala-fication (wakakaka) of the PKR Chinese (unless of course you PKR Malays are from Team W, wakakaka), because it's just a furphy from PKR's Chinese snaky hissing about their own problem.

Anyway the Malaysian Chronicle report (or the PKR Chinese faction, wakakaka) sounded a warning to Anwar as follows:

Johor PKR, for one, has no intention of letting Anwar get his way without a fight. It is understood that Johor PKR political bureau has called for an emergency press conference at 10am on Monday (March 18) at their office in Bandar Baru Uda, Johor Baru.

They are expected to announce their stand on the "seats allocation" matter. Not only DAP but Anwar can expect to get a real peppering.

Perhaps, it is time for the PKR adviser to come down to earth and realize that his greatness came not only from God but from millions of unseen Malaysians who supported him in good faith and without condition.

Anwar should remember that his multiracial credentials, in particular over the past 4 years, were built largely by minority groups such as the Chinese, Indians, Dayaks and KDM, who were fed up with the Umno-BN and willing to fight for change behind his banner.

To treat them shabbily and discard them now that his goal of becoming the next Prime Minister is in sight would not only make a hypocrite of what he stands for but invite well-deserved criticism and retribution.

Can we then expect 3-corner fights (BN, DAP, PKR) in Johor seats like Gelang Patah to the delight of another chua (snake) wakakaka.

By the by, did I ever mention about the nest of vipers that is PKR? wakakaka