/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2026/04/7165b3eda6377cbfa9ed899ce29fe918.jpg)
COMMENT | Assault on constitutional sovereignty of N Sembilan monarchy, rule of law
Published: Sep 21, 2026 2:22 PM
COMMENT | We are a country of laws. Yet several events of the past few days have wrought chaos upon the sanctity of the rule of law and the institutions established under the Federal Constitution.
On Sept 16, 2026, Malaysians were shocked by the news that His Royal Highness the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, had purportedly been deposed unilaterally and unceremoniously by the Negeri Sembilan state executive council without any stated grounds, due process, or enquiry.
The reported conduct of the exco is an egregious violation of the state constitution, and a direct and unlawful assault on the institution of the constitutional monarchy.
The removal of a reigning constitutional sovereign is an extraordinary measure of the gravest constitutional consequence. Political expediency, backroom manoeuvres, and unilateral executive decrees can never be a substitute for due process. In Negeri Sembilan, that removal process is strictly governed by Article 10 of the constitution, which stipulates three conditions.
The first condition for initiating the removal of the ruler is the holding of a “full and complete enquiry by the undangs” to establish whether valid and sufficient grounds exist for such an extraordinary course of action. Based on media reports, there has been no evidence that any enquiry was ever conducted. No charges or grounds of misconduct have ever been made known to the public.
Most crucially, it appears that His Royal Highness was never notified of any allegations, let alone afforded the elementary right to be heard.
Questions over validity, propriety
Attempts by the exco to assert that an enquiry was held do not stand up to scrutiny, having been advanced only belatedly and without any explanation as to whether His Royal Highness was notified or given any opportunity to be heard. In any event, such an alleged enquiry cannot constitute the “full and complete enquiry by the undangs” required under Article 10(1) of the state constitution.
The second and third conditions stipulate that a proclamation must be executed “under the hands of the undangs and the menteri besar”. Serious questions arise as to the validity, propriety, and legality of the purported proclamation dated April 19, 2026, which has been denounced by former menteri besar Aminuddin Harun and disavowed by current Menteri Besar Ismail Lasim, who has stated that he signed it under duress, and in respect of which he has lodged a police report.
On Sept 16, 2026, Malaysians were shocked by the news that His Royal Highness the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, had purportedly been deposed unilaterally and unceremoniously by the Negeri Sembilan state executive council without any stated grounds, due process, or enquiry.
The reported conduct of the exco is an egregious violation of the state constitution, and a direct and unlawful assault on the institution of the constitutional monarchy.
The removal of a reigning constitutional sovereign is an extraordinary measure of the gravest constitutional consequence. Political expediency, backroom manoeuvres, and unilateral executive decrees can never be a substitute for due process. In Negeri Sembilan, that removal process is strictly governed by Article 10 of the constitution, which stipulates three conditions.
The first condition for initiating the removal of the ruler is the holding of a “full and complete enquiry by the undangs” to establish whether valid and sufficient grounds exist for such an extraordinary course of action. Based on media reports, there has been no evidence that any enquiry was ever conducted. No charges or grounds of misconduct have ever been made known to the public.
Most crucially, it appears that His Royal Highness was never notified of any allegations, let alone afforded the elementary right to be heard.
Questions over validity, propriety
Attempts by the exco to assert that an enquiry was held do not stand up to scrutiny, having been advanced only belatedly and without any explanation as to whether His Royal Highness was notified or given any opportunity to be heard. In any event, such an alleged enquiry cannot constitute the “full and complete enquiry by the undangs” required under Article 10(1) of the state constitution.
The second and third conditions stipulate that a proclamation must be executed “under the hands of the undangs and the menteri besar”. Serious questions arise as to the validity, propriety, and legality of the purported proclamation dated April 19, 2026, which has been denounced by former menteri besar Aminuddin Harun and disavowed by current Menteri Besar Ismail Lasim, who has stated that he signed it under duress, and in respect of which he has lodged a police report.
/file/publisher-c1a3f893382d2b2f8a9aa22a654d9c97/2026/01/857dbe729b8427fa36ece5ae30a739bc.png)
Further, if the purported proclamation is dated April 19, 2026 but was signed by this menteri besar only on Aug 3, 2026, this raises a fundamental question as to its validity, given that he was not the menteri besar April 19, 2026.
The exco’s announcement on Sept 16, 2026 smacks of blatant executive overreach. The exco possesses no constitutional mandate, jurisdiction, or power to unseat a ruler. Any such unilateral pronouncement is an ultra vires act that strikes at the very foundation of the constitutional order.
It is noteworthy that the invalidity of the proclamation has been affirmed by the Negeri Sembilan Council of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar and the Ruling Chiefs (Dewan Keadilan dan Undang; DKU), and by the Attorney-General’s Chambers. The State Secretary’s Office has likewise concurred with the latter’s position and declined to proceed with the gazettement of the purported Proclamation.
We, the undersigned, call for an immediate and complete halt to this assault on the constitutional sovereignty of the Negeri Sembilan monarchy and the rule of law. We strongly urge the Negeri Sembilan government, all public officials, and all citizens of Malaysia to faithfully uphold the Federal Constitution and the Negeri Sembilan constitution, preserve the rule of law, and fully respect the sovereignty and constitutional standing of Tuanku Muhriz as the sole, lawful, and reigning Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan.
The exco is not above the law, and its unlawful conduct in this matter must be curbed.
We call on the federal government to step in and finally resolve these troubling issues. This state of affairs sets a dangerous precedent for the constitutional monarchy and the future of this country - a country that must, at all times, chart its course strictly in accordance with the law.
Such unbecoming and undignified conduct, as well as such utter disrespect for the law, must stop.
Endorsed by past Malaysian Bar presidents:
Kuthubul Zaman Bukhari
Yeo Yang Poh
Ambiga Sreenevasan
Ragunath Kesavan
Lim Chee Wee
Christopher Leong
George Varughese
Salim Bashir
Karen Cheah Yee Lynn
No comments:
Post a Comment