Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Exclusive: Saudi Arabia launched covert attacks on Iran as regional war widened, sources say




Exclusive: Saudi Arabia launched covert attacks on Iran as regional war widened, sources say

May 13, 2026
4:08 AM GMT+10
Updated 2 hours ago



Summary

  • Attacks were followed by drop in Iranian strikes on the kingdom, Reuters tally shows
  • Kingdom warned Iran of further retaliation, but diplomatic channels were maintained
  • Saudi-Iran engagement tested by renewed attacks from Iraq


RIYADH/DUBAI, May 12 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia launched numerous, unpublicized strikes on Iran in retaliation for attacks carried out in the kingdom during the Middle East war, two Western officials briefed on the matter and two Iranian officials said.

The Saudi attacks, not previously reported, mark the first time that the ​kingdom is known to have directly carried out military action on Iranian soil and show it is becoming much bolder in defending itself against its main regional rival.

The attacks, launched by the Saudi Air ‌Force, were assessed to have been carried out in late March, the two Western officials said. One said only that they were "tit-for-tat strikes in retaliation for when Saudi (Arabia) was hit."

Reuters was unable to confirm what the specific targets were.

In response to a request for comment, a senior Saudi foreign ministry official did not address directly whether strikes had been carried out.
The Iranian foreign ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

Saudi Arabia, which has a deep military relationship with the United States, has traditionally relied on U.S. military for protection, but the 10-week war has left the kingdom vulnerable to ​attacks that have pierced the U.S. military umbrella.


GULF ARAB STATES BEGAN HITTING BACK

The Saudi strikes underscore the widening of the conflict — and the extent to which a war that began when the U.S. and Israel launched airstrikes on ​Iran on February 28 has drawn in the broader Middle East in ways that have not been publicly acknowledged.

Since the U.S. and Israeli strikes, Iran has hit all six Gulf Cooperation Council ⁠states with missiles and drones, attacking not only U.S. military bases but civilian sites, airports and oil infrastructure, and closed the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting global trade.

The United Arab Emirates also carried out military strikes on Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. ​Together, the Saudi and Emirati actions reveal a conflict whose true shape has remained largely hidden — one in which Gulf monarchies battered by Iranian attacks began hitting back.

But their approach has not been identical. The UAE has taken a more hawkish stance, seeking ​to extract a cost from Iran and engaging only rarely in public diplomacy with Tehran.

Saudi Arabia has meanwhile sought to prevent the conflict from escalating and has stayed in regular contact with Iran, including via Tehran's ambassador in Riyadh. He did not respond to a request for comment.
The senior Saudi foreign ministry official did not directly address whether a de-escalation agreement had been struck with Iran, but said: "We reaffirm Saudi Arabia's consistent position advocating de-escalation, self-restraint and the reduction of tensions in pursuit of the stability, security and prosperity of the region and its people."


STRIKES, THEN DE-ESCALATION

The Iranian and ​Western officials said Saudi Arabia made Iran aware of the strikes and this was followed by intensive diplomatic engagement and Saudi threats to retaliate further, which led to an understanding between the two countries to de-escalate.

Ali Vaez, the Iran Project Director at ​the International Crisis Group, said retaliatory Saudi strikes on Iran, followed by an understanding to de-escalate, would "show pragmatic recognition on both sides that uncontrolled escalation carries unacceptable costs."
Such a sequence of events would show "not trust, but a shared interest in imposing limits on confrontation before it ‌spiraled into a ⁠wider regional conflict."

The informal de-escalation took effect in the week before Washington and Tehran agreed to a ceasefire in their broader conflict on April 7. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

One of the Iranian officials confirmed that Tehran and Riyadh had agreed to de-escalate, saying the move aimed to "cease hostilities, safeguard mutual interests, and prevent the escalation of tensions."

Long at odds, Iran and Saudi Arabia — the two leading Shi'ite and Sunni Muslim powers in the Middle East — have backed opposing groups in conflicts across the region.

A China-brokered détente in 2023 saw them resume ties, including a ceasefire between the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen and Saudi Arabia that has since held.

With the Red Sea remaining open to shipping, Saudi Arabia has been able to continue exporting oil ​throughout the conflict, unlike most Gulf states, and so has ​managed to remain relatively insulated.


KINGDOM AVOIDED 'FURNACE OF DESTRUCTION', SAYS ⁠PRINCE

In an op-ed in Saudi-owned Arab News over the weekend, former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal captured the kingdom's calculus, writing that "when Iran and others tried to drag the kingdom into the furnace of destruction, our leadership chose to endure the pains caused by a neighbor in order to protect the lives and property of its citizens."
Saudi Arabia's strikes followed weeks of mounting tension.

At ​a press conference in Riyadh on March 19, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan said the kingdom "reserved the right to take military actions if deemed necessary."

Three days later, Saudi ​Arabia declared Iran's military attaché and ⁠four embassy staff members personae non gratae.


IRAN CURTAILED DIRECT HITS ON KINGDOM, SOURCES SAY

By the end of March, diplomatic contacts and the threat by Saudi Arabia to take a more hawkish approach akin to the UAE and retaliate further led to an understanding to de-escalate, the Western sources said.

From more than 105 drone and missile attacks on Saudi Arabia in the week of March 25-31, the number fell to just over 25 between April 1-6, according to a Reuters tally of Saudi defence ministry statements.
Projectiles fired at Saudi Arabia in the ⁠days leading up ​to the wider ceasefire were assessed by Western sources to have originated in Iraq rather than Iran itself, indicating Tehran had curtailed direct strikes while ​allied groups continued to operate.

Saudi Arabia summoned Iraq's ambassador on April 12 to protest against attacks from Iraqi soil.

The Saudi-Iranian communication continued even as strains emerged at the start of the broader ceasefire between Iran and the U.S., when the Saudi defence ministry reported 31 drones and 16 missiles fired at the kingdom ​on April 7-8.

The spike prompted Riyadh to consider retaliation against Iran and Iraq, while Pakistan deployed fighter jets to reassure the kingdom and urged restraint as diplomacy gathered pace.


7 comments:

  1. 🚨 BREAKING:

    🇱🇧🇮🇷 Lebanon has filed a formal complaint against Iran at the UN Security Council, the first time it has taken such a step.

    - The complaint accuses Tehran of violating the Vienna Convention, interfering in Lebanese sovereign decision-making, and involving the IRGC in unlawful actions that caused widespread destruction
    - Lebanon also challenges Iran's narrative around the killing of Iranian diplomats in Beirut, saying some of the deceased were not officially registered as diplomats
    - The complaint alleges Iran failed to comply with Lebanese decisions regarding its ambassador and continued meddling in internal affairs

    Source: MTV Lebanon

    https://x.com/marionawfal/status/2054519938199548141?s=46

    ReplyDelete
  2. 🇮🇱 🇦🇪BREAKING: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu secretly visited the United Arab Emirates during the war with Iran and met with President Mohamed bin Zayed

    “This visit resulted in a historic breakthrough in relations between Israel and the UAE,” PMO said.

    A few details of Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE:

    1. A secret flight reportedly took place while Israeli airspace was fully shut,without leaks or detection.

    2. Sources suggest a deal was reached on an Iron Dome shipment, spectro systems and Iron Beam

    3. UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has publicly hosted Israeli leaders like Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid, but not Benjamin Netanyahu. Until now, their contacts stayed behind closed doors.

    Sources; I24, N12 etc

    https://x.com/iambrianbj/status/2054611907139559661?s=46

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Mahjong Tiles in the ME are moving around!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oooop… yr kind of A3 mahjong, no doubt!

      Delete
  4. Norway Say:

    "Thank You Ed Milliband, Leave All The Minyak Dan Gas To Us. Norway Hopes You Will Become YewKay's next PM".

    Miliband vows permanent shutdown of the North Sea.
    Labour plans to make it harder for a future government to reopen oil fields

    Jonathan Leake
    Energy Editor
    Jonathan Leake is the Telegraph's Energy Editor.
    Published 13 May 2026 7:53pm BST

    Labour is to ban new oil and gas fields in Britain, making it far harder for any future government to reopen the North Sea.

    A legal prohibition on new drilling will be included in the energy independence bill, part of the raft of new legislation set out by the King in his speech opening Parliament on Wednesday.

    The bill will make Ed Miliband’s temporary moratorium on new drilling permanent, ensuring it would be far harder for a future government to reverse the ban. Labour also plans to legally ban onshore fracking.

    A detailed note released by the Energy Secretary’s officials after the King’s Speech said the bill would “meet [Labour’s] manifesto commitment not to issue new licences to explore new fields, including delivering the commitment to ban fracking”.

    However, the timing is controversial because the Iran war has choked off supplies of fuel from the Middle East and created a global oil crisis. Leading executives, including the bosses of British Gas and Octopus Energy, have urged Mr Miliband to rethink his North Sea policy as a result.

    The Energy Secretary’s plan won praise from environmental campaigners but generated a backlash from his political rivals, the offshore industry and Sir Tony Blair’s think tank.

    Claire Coutinho, the shadow energy secretary, said the policy would “amount to the wilful destruction of our own domestic energy supplies and people’s livelihoods”.

    She added: “It is utterly shameful and we Conservatives will fight them every step of the way.”

    Richard Tice, Reform’s energy spokesman, called the plan “ludicrous”.

    ...more

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/05/13/miliband-vows-permanent-shutdown-of-the-north-sea/?WT.mc_id=tmgoff_tw_post_shutdown-of-the-north-sea/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Reuter's manipulated media fart!

    ReplyDelete