Thursday, August 07, 2025

After Mandarin option surfaces, APAD warns e-hailing firms against language-based bookings





After Mandarin option surfaces, APAD warns e-hailing firms against language-based bookings



Tourists look on during the Changing of the Guard ceremony at Istana Negara in Kuala Lumpur on May 10, 2025. — Bernama pic

Thursday, 07 Aug 2025 4:37 PM MYT


KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 7 — The Land Public Transport Agency (APAD) has warned that it will not tolerate any language-based discrimination in the ride-hailing booking allocation systems used by e-hailing operators.

In a statement issued today, APAD said it took a grave view of claims online involving language-based discrimination in the booking system of a ride-hailing app.


While the agency did not specify this, there were discussions online about a major e-hailing operator that introduced a feature allowing customers to specifically book Mandarin-fluent drivers.

APAD reminded all e-hailing services that they are legally required to comply with licensing conditions under the Special Conditions of Business Mediation Licence (LPP), specifically Paragraph 9 concerning Service Level Requirements.



The regulation clearly states that booking allocation systems must be fair and equitable to all drivers.



“Any violation of these conditions constitutes a single offence punishable under Section 12A(9) of the Land Public Transport Act 2010.

“If convicted, the party involved can be fined not less than RM1,000 but not more than RM200,000 or be imprisoned for a term not exceeding two years, or both,” it warned.


APAD reaffirmed its commitment to upholding an e-hailing industry that is fair, transparent, inclusive, and free from any form of discrimination.

In posts online, users shared screenshots of an e-hailing app that provided an option to book Mandarin-speaking drivers, albeit at a premium.

It also provides options for Malay and Tamil languages.

The operator rolled back the option soon after, however, following public backlash.


1 comment:

  1. What is so discriminating in offering language option when choosing a service?

    The choice is up to the user. He/She pays for what is needed to satisfy the pending circumstances. That's SLA in the true sense!

    What is the point of having a duck guiding a chook?

    ReplyDelete