theVibes.com:
Police probe if Pamela Ling fled the country, lawyer demands answers
Pamela's lawyer Sangeet Kaur Deo has called for an immediate investigation into any role MACC might have in her disappearance.
Updated 12 minutes ago
Published on 13 May 2025 11:52AM
It has been 33 days since Pamela went missing, - May 13, 2025
POLICE are conducting a detailed investigation into the case of Datin Seri Pamela Ling Yueh, who was reported missing on April 9, including the possibility that the individual may have fled abroad.
Putrajaya District Police Chief Aidi Sham Mohamed said that so far, the individual's movement out of the country has been blocked by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) while the team is conducting the investigation.
"The police will also record statements of the individual's children and witnesses will be taken in the near future and are being arranged by the International Police (Intepol).
"So far, a total of 27 witnesses have also had their statements recorded," he said in a statement today.
He said police also ruled out the possibility of other suspects being involved in the case.
Yesterday, the media reported that Interpol was arranging to record statements from Pamela’s son.
Pamela, the wife of a businessman from Sarawak, was reported missing after taking an e-hailing service from Cheras to the MACC office.
Witnesses claimed that the vehicle she was travelling in was blocked by three cars and she was then taken away by individuals wearing police uniforms.
Lawyer calls for detailed probe
Meanwhile, Pamela's lawyer Sangeet Kaur Deo has called for an immediate investigation into any role MACC might have in her disappearance.
She said it has been 33 days since Pamela went missing, and the MACC has yet to explain its actions leading up to her disappearance.
“An immediate, independent, and transparent investigation into MACC’s role is essential.
“MACC said Pamela was only assisting in investigations, then claimed she was a ‘suspect’. Which was it? If she was a suspect all along, why was this not made clear? If she wasn’t, why was she hunted so aggressively?” the lawyer said in a statement.
She added that the MACC released a timeline of events but left out key details such as Pamela being arrested, held in custody, questioned multiple times, and placed under a travel ban that separated her from her children.
Sangeet claimed that Pamela was forced to stay in Malaysia under MACC’s watch, and was separated from her three children in Singapore due to a travel ban that was imposed without any explanation.
“Even when her lawyers sought to lift the restriction, the MACC refused to respond. Just days later, she disappeared.
“The MACC’s integrity is being called into question. Yet, in the face of growing public concerns, the MACC has remained silent," she said.
She called on MACC to answer three matters - Who gave the order to go after Pamela?; Why was she repeatedly pressed over personal matters unrelated to MACC’s legal powers? and why has the MACC chief commissioner stayed silent?
She said Malaysians deserved a corruption-fighting institution that commands trust, not one that fuels mistrust by “retreating into silence when transparency is most needed”. – May 13, 2025
POLICE are conducting a detailed investigation into the case of Datin Seri Pamela Ling Yueh, who was reported missing on April 9, including the possibility that the individual may have fled abroad.
Putrajaya District Police Chief Aidi Sham Mohamed said that so far, the individual's movement out of the country has been blocked by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) while the team is conducting the investigation.
"The police will also record statements of the individual's children and witnesses will be taken in the near future and are being arranged by the International Police (Intepol).
"So far, a total of 27 witnesses have also had their statements recorded," he said in a statement today.
He said police also ruled out the possibility of other suspects being involved in the case.
Yesterday, the media reported that Interpol was arranging to record statements from Pamela’s son.
Pamela, the wife of a businessman from Sarawak, was reported missing after taking an e-hailing service from Cheras to the MACC office.
Witnesses claimed that the vehicle she was travelling in was blocked by three cars and she was then taken away by individuals wearing police uniforms.
Lawyer calls for detailed probe
Meanwhile, Pamela's lawyer Sangeet Kaur Deo has called for an immediate investigation into any role MACC might have in her disappearance.
She said it has been 33 days since Pamela went missing, and the MACC has yet to explain its actions leading up to her disappearance.
“An immediate, independent, and transparent investigation into MACC’s role is essential.
“MACC said Pamela was only assisting in investigations, then claimed she was a ‘suspect’. Which was it? If she was a suspect all along, why was this not made clear? If she wasn’t, why was she hunted so aggressively?” the lawyer said in a statement.
She added that the MACC released a timeline of events but left out key details such as Pamela being arrested, held in custody, questioned multiple times, and placed under a travel ban that separated her from her children.
Sangeet claimed that Pamela was forced to stay in Malaysia under MACC’s watch, and was separated from her three children in Singapore due to a travel ban that was imposed without any explanation.
“Even when her lawyers sought to lift the restriction, the MACC refused to respond. Just days later, she disappeared.
“The MACC’s integrity is being called into question. Yet, in the face of growing public concerns, the MACC has remained silent," she said.
She called on MACC to answer three matters - Who gave the order to go after Pamela?; Why was she repeatedly pressed over personal matters unrelated to MACC’s legal powers? and why has the MACC chief commissioner stayed silent?
She said Malaysians deserved a corruption-fighting institution that commands trust, not one that fuels mistrust by “retreating into silence when transparency is most needed”. – May 13, 2025
***
kt comments:
While Police are checking on the whereabouts of Pamela Ling, please also check on the mysterious death-falls of (a) Teoh Beng Hock on 16 July 2009, and (b) Ahmad Sarbani bin Mohamad, BOTH being in the custody of the MACC at the time of their sudden deaths.
Last updated Oct 14, 2018
Back in 2011, Kit Siang said the MACC must take responsibility not just for Beng Hock’s murder but for the murder of Customs Department officer Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed as well. Today, Kit Siang says the MACC is not to be blamed but Najib who was Prime Minister then must take the blame.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Lim Kit Siang and Najib Tun Razak are engaged in a public debate regarding Teoh Beng Hock’s murder.
Kit Siang said, since Najib was the Prime Minister on 16th July 2009 (he took over as Prime Minister three months before that) then the Prime Minister must personally take the blame for the murder even if he did not personally murder Beng Hock.
Apek ini sudah nyanyok ke?
What about the murder of 500 other people over the last 30 years, all who also died while in custody? Should the three Prime Ministers over the last 30 years (Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Najib) be personally held responsible for these 500 murders as well?
Back in 2011, Kit Siang said the MACC must take responsibility not just for Beng Hock’s murder but for the murder of Customs Department officer Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed as well. Today, Kit Siang says the MACC is not to be blamed but Najib who was Prime Minister then must take the blame.
Apek ini sudah nyanyok ke?
Back in 2011, Kit Siang said the MACC must take responsibility not just for Beng Hock’s murder but for the murder of Customs Department officer Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed as well. Today, Kit Siang says the MACC is not to be blamed but Najib who was Prime Minister then must take the blame.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Lim Kit Siang and Najib Tun Razak are engaged in a public debate regarding Teoh Beng Hock’s murder.
Kit Siang said, since Najib was the Prime Minister on 16th July 2009 (he took over as Prime Minister three months before that) then the Prime Minister must personally take the blame for the murder even if he did not personally murder Beng Hock.
Apek ini sudah nyanyok ke?
What about the murder of 500 other people over the last 30 years, all who also died while in custody? Should the three Prime Ministers over the last 30 years (Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Najib) be personally held responsible for these 500 murders as well?
Back in 2011, Kit Siang said the MACC must take responsibility not just for Beng Hock’s murder but for the murder of Customs Department officer Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed as well. Today, Kit Siang says the MACC is not to be blamed but Najib who was Prime Minister then must take the blame.
Apek ini sudah nyanyok ke?
***
kt comments again:
Please read below:
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Teoh. Sort by date Show all posts
6/01/2017
Let us not forget Teoh Beng Hock
Alas, someone in the DAP might have forgotten
The evil that was perpetuated on a young manBy a Nazi-like organization that has been rotten
Yet easily forgiven by a political flash in the pan
All for grubby politics, none for integrity nor justice
For a man slain on the very eve of his wedding day
Oh we weep, what treachery to become so solicitous
To abandon principles, an evil crime now is gainsay
When is the MACC going to hand over to the police the person responsible for the untimely death of Teoh Beng Hock?
 |
DAP leader Lim Kit Siang shook hands with Rohaizad Yaakob, a top Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) official to show the opposition’s solidarity with the MACC Yet just a year earlier Kit Siang in his article, titled "Malaysians will not rest until justice is done for the killing of Teoh Beng Hock" said DAP and Pakatan Rakyat would continue to highlight the injustice of Teoh Beng Hock’s unresolved murder what utter bullshit |
But I haven't!
When is the MACC going to hand over to the police the person responsible for the untimely death of Teoh Beng Hock?
8/06/2015
Forgetting Teoh Beng Hock
Hey, my late name was Teoh Beng Hock
Is that even in your memory
Or just a wee footnote in history
My story soon to become mere talk-cock
Those who sinned against me
Cursing my family with veritable untold woes
Making Er Jia a fatherless baby
And those men with no pity
Have become icons by you, your new heroes
Thou faithless headless chooks
Cursing my family with veritable untold woes
Making Er Jia a fatherless baby
And those men with no pity
Have become icons by you, your new heroes
Thou faithless headless chooks
Have further insulted my already grieving family
Giving the enemy support but not rebukes
Ever greater pain my family now brooks
All because of your sad self-interest treachery
Giving the enemy support but not rebukes
Ever greater pain my family now brooks
All because of your sad self-interest treachery
Bhai once said don't be immoral
In desperately seeking victory without morality
Nor should one be ever unethical
But safeguard and value our principle
To never sacrifice and replace with hypocrisy
In desperately seeking victory without morality
Nor should one be ever unethical
But safeguard and value our principle
To never sacrifice and replace with hypocrisy
YOU UNMITIGATED HYPOCRITICAL BASTARDS!
Read also my KTemoc Komposes posts:
(1) Remembering Teoh Beng Hock
(2) The murder of Teoh Beng Hock
(3) I work for the rights of the dead
And read Malaysiakini:
Ayam even more concerned about victims of MH17 and MH370. Bloodymir Pootin protecting the convicted criminals and Old Bullyland not helping to look for the plane.
ReplyDelete