India ‘precision strikes’ Pakistan killing at least eight, Islamabad vows retaliation

A flare goes up in air over the hill near main town of Poonch district today. — AFP pic
Wednesday, 07 May 2025 9:04 AM MYT
MUZAFFARABAD (Pakistan), May 7 — India fired missiles at Pakistani territory early yesterday, killing at least eight people, according to Pakistan, which said it had begun retaliating in a major escalation between the nuclear-armed rivals.
The Indian government said it had carried out “precision strikes at terrorist camps” at nine sites in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, days after it blamed Islamabad for a deadly attack on the Indian-run side of the disputed region.
The Indian army, in a video posted on X after the strikes, said “justice is served”, with New Delhi adding that its actions “have been focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature”.
Pakistan reported eight civilians — including one child — killed in the strikes, which hit at least six locations.
The country’s Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif told AFP: “The retaliation has already started. We won’t take long to settle the score.” He accused Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi of launching the strikes to “shore up” his domestic popularity.
Earlier, Pakistan’s military said three locations in Pakistan-administered Kashmir had been hit along with two — Bahawalpur and Muridke — in the country’s most populous province of Punjab.
AFP correspondents in Pakistani-run Kashmir and Punjab heard several loud explosions.
Shortly after, India accused Pakistan of firing artillery across the Line of Control (LoC), the de facto border in Kashmir, which could also be heard by AFP correspondents in the region.
India had been widely expected to respond militarily to the April 22 attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir by gunmen it said were from Pakistan-based group Lashkar-e-Taiba, a UN-designated terrorist organisation.
That assault left 26 people dead, mainly Hindu men, in the tourist hotspot of Pahalgam. No group has claimed responsibility.
New Delhi has blamed Islamabad for backing the attack, sparking a series of heated threats and diplomatic tit-for-tat measures.
Pakistan rejects the accusations, and the two sides have exchanged nightly gunfire since April 24 along the LoC, according to the Indian army. Pakistan also said it has held two missile tests.
Maximum restraint
Yesterday’s strikes are a dangerous heightening of friction between the South Asian neighbours, who have fought multiple wars since they gained independence from the British in 1947.
For days the international community has piled pressure on Pakistan and India to step back from the brink of war.
“The world cannot afford a military confrontation between India and Pakistan,” the spokesman for UN chief Antonio Guterres, Stephane Dujarric, said in a statement, adding that Guterres called for “maximum restraint.”
Asked about the strikes, US President Donald Trump told reporters in Washington he hopes the fighting “ends very quickly”.
India’s embassy in Washington said New Delhi’s National Security Advisor Ajit Doval had briefed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio after the strikes.
Rubio also spoke with Pakistan’s national security advisor, Lt General Asim Malik, a senior Pakistani military official told AFP.
“I am monitoring the situation between India and Pakistan closely,” Rubio said on X, adding that he will “continue to engage both Indian and Pakistani leadership towards a peaceful resolution”.
Explosions near LoC
India’s army said it had “demonstrated considerable restraint in selection of targets and method of execution”, adding that “no Pakistani military facilities have been targeted”.
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, calling the Indian attack “unprovoked” and “cowardly”, said the “heinous act of aggression will not go unpunished.”
Indian fighter jets could be heard flying over Srinagar, the capital of Indian-administered Kashmir.
Loud explosions could also be heard in the town of Poonch, only about 10 miles (16 kilometres) from the LoC.
Rebels in Indian-administered Kashmir have waged an insurgency since 1989, seeking independence or a merger with Pakistan.
India regularly blames its neighbour for backing armed groups fighting its forces in Kashmir, a charge that Islamabad denies.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is expected in New Delhi yesterday, two days after a visit to Islamabad, as Tehran seeks to mediate.
India was also set to hold several civil defence drills yesterday, while schools in Pakistan’s Punjab were closed, local government officials said.
The strikes came just hours after Modi said that water flowing across India’s borders would be stopped. Pakistan had warned that tampering with the rivers that flow from India into its territory would be an “act of war”.
Modi did not mention Islamabad specifically, but his speech came after New Delhi suspended its part of the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty, which governs water critical to Pakistan for consumption and agriculture.
“India’s water used to go outside, now it will flow for India,” Modi said in a speech in New Delhi. — AFP
***
kt comments:
Modi said that water flowing across India’s borders would be stopped. I don't think that's advisable unless Modi wants the war to continue a la Satanyahu's intention.
This could quickly escalate to Indo-Pak nuking each other.
ReplyDeleteKaboom.
'"Modi said that water flowing across India’s borders would be stopped. I don't think that's advisable"
ReplyDelete5,000-year old Bullyland is doing the similar to Mekong and Brahmaputra, which all have their source in 5,000 year old Bully Land, but majority who are automatically pro-5,000-year old Buillyland are OK with that
Source in Himalaya mountain range, contributing just the initial source.
DeleteMfer, what happened to tributaries downstream where the monsoon climate sublimates the regional climate?
Ooop… don't know about that! Just hentam as farted by those western media. Forgetting about the pollution too done to the rivers when reaching human habitats.
India and Modi is over reacting. Their response is not proportional to the killings of “only” 26 tourists in Kashmir. Only 26, why the need for all out attack & war. It’s not like Ishmael killed 1200 civilians at the Nova Music festival and took hundreds of hostages. Isaac then launched a response on Gaza which people from all over the world protested, like in Harvard, Columbia and KL. Isaac should have kept cool and just bang table at UNGA
ReplyDeleteI hope Pakistanis now won’t cry
“From the Ganges to the Indus, Kashmir will be Free”.
Greta Thunberg the useful idiot will soon fly into Jammu Kashmir in a Hot Air Balloon in PRIDE colours, flying a Greenpeace Flag and screaming “How Dare You” on her megaphone.
Tian Chua will protes or not?
Instead Modi should stay calm, offer peace talks over a pot of Twinings Tea with Pakistan PM, propose a Two State solution for Kashmir. Nothing for Old 5000 yo Bullyland, their claim for Aksai Chin and Karakoram is ludicrous. They, in fact, would be suitable neutral peacemakers, not PMX who sides with one side.
So now let’s see how many university protes there will be for Yindia or Pakistan? No Isaacs involved here.
yr mfering protests should start in the USofA.
DeleteOoop… again u don't know about that! Then just concentrate in spreading yr zionist gospel of move-on lah.
Maharaja Hari SINGH decided to join India, not Pakistan, in 1947. No he was not Hindu or Muslim, so he was neutral. Why can’t the Ishmaels respect his decision. Just like the Sultan of Brunei decided not to join Malaysia in 1963. We respected his decision. No need to gaduh or perang.
ReplyDeleteooop… u have conveniently ignored that evil hands of pommie!
DeleteBravo!!!!
Yindia Weaponising Water Flow is nothing new. Toonsie has done that countless times to that Little Red Dot ha3.
ReplyDeleteThe Arab League (now 22 members) in 1964 approved an evil plan to divert two of the three sources of the Jordan River (yes THAT river)
that flows into the Sea of Galilee, one of the most important sources of agriculture and potable water for Isaacs.
1. The Hasbani River is one of the sources that flows in Lebanon, Golan Heights and to the Sea of Galilee.
2. The Banias River flows from the Golan Heights to the Jordan River and the Sea of Galilee.
Diverting this flow will dry up the Sea of Galilee, but the Arab League don't care, as long as Isaacs have no water.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headwater_Diversion_Plan_(Jordan_River)
Israel had no choice but to take control over the strategic Golan Heights.
The UN resolution then passed a ridiculous Resolution (Security Council Resolution 497 (1981)), declaring Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights as null and void. It also reaffirms the continued applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention to the Golan as an occupied territory.
What a biased and stupid resolution. So now lets see what decision the UN will make on this Yindian-Pakistan river and who will abide by it.
Don't u forget that ur beloved Issacs r Europe rejects forcefully occupying others' land.
DeleteTo chase out the trespassing zionists from their land, anything & everything r game!
India can easily overwhelm Paki defences if it chose to go all out.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately that will likely set up a Nuke escalation.
Kaboom.
wakakakaks… u didn't read about the casaulty of that assault?
Delete6 planes downed with unknown Indian civilian casualty!