Not wise to think of barring arraigned MPs from Dewan, say lawyers
There has been a proposal to bar MPs facing charges in court from Dewan Rakyat proceedings.
PETALING JAYA: Two lawyers have questioned the wisdom of a proposal to bar MPs facing charges in court from Dewan Rakyat proceedings.
PETALING JAYA: Two lawyers have questioned the wisdom of a proposal to bar MPs facing charges in court from Dewan Rakyat proceedings.
guess I'll still see you in the Dewan, matey
Commenting on remarks that the Dewan Negara president Rais Yatim made recently, Bastian Pius Vendargon and SN Nair said the ban might go against the legal principle of presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
They said a lot of thought needed to be put into the proposal before any move to amend the law.
“That sort of legislation is not generally acceptable,” said Vendargon, a constitutional expert.
They said a lot of thought needed to be put into the proposal before any move to amend the law.
“That sort of legislation is not generally acceptable,” said Vendargon, a constitutional expert.
Bastian Pius Vendargon.
Nair noted that a basic principle of Malaysia’s criminal justice system is to presume a defendant’s innocence until all appeal processes are exhausted.
Both lawyers told FMT they were also concerned over constituents’ loss of representation when MPs affected by the rule are unable to perform their duties as elected representatives.
“That will be unfair to both the MPs facing charges and their constituents,” said Nair.
Last Thursday, Rais said amendments to the Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers) Act were being reviewed and that the matter regarding MPs facing charges had been discussed in a special meeting on parliament transformation.
Nair said the proposal ran afoul of Article 48 of the Federal Constitution, which underlines the factors that would disqualify an MP from being a member of the lower house, and that he believed amending the law to pursue the proposal would require a constitutional amendment.
Nair noted that a basic principle of Malaysia’s criminal justice system is to presume a defendant’s innocence until all appeal processes are exhausted.
Both lawyers told FMT they were also concerned over constituents’ loss of representation when MPs affected by the rule are unable to perform their duties as elected representatives.
“That will be unfair to both the MPs facing charges and their constituents,” said Nair.
Last Thursday, Rais said amendments to the Houses of Parliament (Privileges and Powers) Act were being reviewed and that the matter regarding MPs facing charges had been discussed in a special meeting on parliament transformation.
Nair said the proposal ran afoul of Article 48 of the Federal Constitution, which underlines the factors that would disqualify an MP from being a member of the lower house, and that he believed amending the law to pursue the proposal would require a constitutional amendment.
SN Nair.
Vendargon disagreed, saying a constitutional amendment might not be required.
He said he was “not in full support of the proposal” but added that he saw it as “undesirable” to have MPs face serious criminal charges in court.
“There’s this element of undesirability of having parliamentarians who have to be in court to defend themselves in long trials as opposed to being in Parliament and at their constituencies carrying out their duties,” he said.
“So, we have to find an answer. I’m not in favour of a blanket situation where you say they cannot go to Parliament. But there’s got to be a better way.”
He also said an MP failing to attend sittings for a certain period for whatever reason could be deemed to have vacated his seat.
Vendargon disagreed, saying a constitutional amendment might not be required.
He said he was “not in full support of the proposal” but added that he saw it as “undesirable” to have MPs face serious criminal charges in court.
“There’s this element of undesirability of having parliamentarians who have to be in court to defend themselves in long trials as opposed to being in Parliament and at their constituencies carrying out their duties,” he said.
“So, we have to find an answer. I’m not in favour of a blanket situation where you say they cannot go to Parliament. But there’s got to be a better way.”
He also said an MP failing to attend sittings for a certain period for whatever reason could be deemed to have vacated his seat.
$15 Million for 63 Chinese Schools serving 20,000 students.... $35 MILLION FOR RENOVATION OF SRI PERDANA PM STUPID RACIST MANSION FOR SIMPLE JOB IS THE TESTIMONY OF EPIC CORRUPTION FOR 63 YEARS!!...BABI BANGSAT MACC ADA MATA KAH??? GOT EYES KAH???.. IN 2021 HENDRA-MERS-DELTA MUTATED COVID 2021 VARIANT IS THE ONLY SOLUTION FOR FAIL STATE MALU-SIAL...DEATH TO ALL WHO CONDONE CORRUPTION OF EPIC SCALE!!......SURPRISING ONLY THE SUPREMACIST RACE WILL HAVE DISPROPORTIONATE DEATH LEADING TO AGENDA 2020 ...13 NEW NATION WITHOUT AH LONG AND SUE TAN!!...MALAYSIAL SUDAH BANKRUPT...
ReplyDeleteI think those oredy found guilty by High Court or higher like Jibby should be barred from Parlimen.
ReplyDelete