With crosshairs on their backs, DAP reps raise 'deep state' poser
According to DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng, this question was posed during a meeting of party lawmakers last night.
Questions were raised as to why similar action was not taken against opposition leaders when they were in government, before the 2018 general elections.
"A common question that remains unanswered was why action was taken against DAP elected representatives by the present government for alleged offences committed before 2018 when the previous BN government had not taken similar action against them.
you should have eff-ed those Rocket people, you brat, and you failed to report to me for 6 months |
"Failure to take similar action against the then government leaders who are now in opposition, some who have given funds, raises questions of the existence of a deep state," said Lim in a statement today.
While Lim did not elaborate on what he meant by "some who have given funds", it was a likely an allusion to the links between some figures in the previous administration and the defunct Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
Last week, two DAP lawmakers - G Saminathan and P Gunasekaran - were among five DAP members who were charged under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 over alleged links with LTTE.
The meeting last night at the DAP headquarters involved MPs and state lawmakers from the entire country. Such meetings are usually called only under special circumstances.
Lim said another issue raised during the meeting was the banning of a comic book for allegedly promoting communism.
"Again questions were raised as to why no action was also taken against former government leaders who attended a communist party training school or gave speeches at a communist party congress," he said.
Lim said the views of the meeting participants were raised in cabinet today.
"An explanation should be forthcoming by the authorities on LTTE, which does not exist any more, vis-a-vis other existing terrorist organisations like ISIS," he said.
Lim said another issue raised during the meeting was the banning of a comic book for allegedly promoting communism.
"Again questions were raised as to why no action was also taken against former government leaders who attended a communist party training school or gave speeches at a communist party congress," he said.
Lim said the views of the meeting participants were raised in cabinet today.
"An explanation should be forthcoming by the authorities on LTTE, which does not exist any more, vis-a-vis other existing terrorist organisations like ISIS," he said.
Is Guan Eng saying the "Deep State" exist now, in the Pakatan governed Malaysia headed by Mahathir, policed by Atuk's macai IGP Hamid Bador and his Merry Men & Women in the PDRM?
Hamid Bador: 'I'll never turn against Tun Mahathir' 'Even if I am cut in 12 pieces, I will never defame the servant of Allah who has contributed so much to the country' |
I make this reasonable assumption because Guan Eng said no such anti DAP kerbau's had taken place under the previous Najib Administration.
So, does the "Deep State" Guan Eng alluded to, report to Atuk?
I'm suddenly reminded of Atuk as Bapak Ops Lalang where and when he put people he didn't like behind bars, including Lim KS, Lim GE himself, Karpal Singh, Chandra Muzaffar, the Dong Zong community, etc.
Hasn't the recent midnight knock on the Anehs' doors been reminiscent of Ops Lalang?
Is the present brutal draconian exercise of SOSMA in arresting alleged LTTE terrorists, especially from the DAP membership, a connivance by Atuk and his macai IGP and their "Deep State" to show:
(i) Malay voters in Tanjung Piai that with Atuk as Pahlawan Hang Mamak, all's well & safe for them, and
(ii) Malays in the Heartland that Parti Pribumi can ensure their safety, security (& gullibility) as UMNO III, a party for Malays to join?
Likewise, is Superman Hew being hounded by the same "Deep State"?
presented by Mahathir himself to Chinese president Xi Jinping, and witnessed by new Macai Does that make Mahathir a pro-Chinese Communist suspect? |
No comments:
Post a Comment