Sunday, June 22, 2008

Omnia Vincit Jambuism

Yin and yang.

I get to like a bloke I didn’t before, but I am disappointed with a group I had admiration for.

This post is on the first, the cheery bit.

Haris Ibrahim of The People’s Parliament blog!

I have to admit I didn’t like him before … well, because of what I saw as his double standards in okaying the Bersih rally whilst condemning Hindraf’s.

But my blogging mate, hardworking civil activist Lucia Lai of the charming blog Mental Jog has frequently attempted to correct my impression of Haris Ibrahim, telling me he’s a nice bloke and in fact had apologised for his initial criticism of Hindraf.

Well, kaytee can be a wee stubborn and while not harbouring any intense dislike of Haris, didn’t look at him with the neutrality that our lack of acquaintance calls for. I believe I might even have made a couple of minor snide remarks at him in my previous posts.

But what changed my mind was a recent post by Haris which appeared in Malaysiakini corner for Top Blogs. I don’t normally visit The People’s Parliament blog but the title of that post was rather catchy – Jambuism ;-)

As a Malaysian, of course I know what ‘jambu’ and ‘ism’ are, but what the content was, at that time remained a mystery to me. As I was already on Malaysiakini home page, it was only a mere click away from reading it. They say ‘curiosity kills a cat’ (even a creature said to have nine lives), but fortunately for me, it was ‘curiosity kills a prejudice’.

Haris wrote about God and our belief in him as follows:

Take the following four as given and not calling for proof.

First, that there is a God who will one day judge all of us.

Second, that there is a heaven and a hell and, based on God’s judgment, all of us will either go to heaven or hell. There is no halfway house.

Third, God’s law for all of us can be summed up by the following: serve Him by loving all of creation.

Finally, we all believe in God.

Of course being an atheist I don’t agree with him, but that’s irrelevant because the rest of his story carries the more important message.

Yet even as we all believe, some believe in the unseen God whilst others ascribe to Him a form.

Imagine now that one Z, a bachelor with no family dependents, believes that the jambu tree in his garden is God. Every morning, Z wakes up, goes into his garden, prostrates before the jambu tree and gives thanks for the blessings he will receive and asks that he be given strength and courage to do what is good and right.

After his morning prayers, Z leaves his house and heads for his workplace of the last 30 years: an orphanage. Z teaches English to young orphans. Lunch is provided at the orphanage and in the evening, before he leaves for home, Z picks up two food packs. One for dinner that night and the other for breakfast tomorrow. That’s his wages for the day.

That, in a nutshell, sums up Z’s daily life.

Fast forward to judgment day.

Never mind my atheist’s lack of belief in Judgement Day, but read on …

Z’s turn is up and he is summoned into the judgment chamber.

He enters with great trepidation, expecting to see his familiar jambu tree.

No tree.

Nothing, except the sense of a Great Presence.

And then he hears judgment being handed down.

“Expecting a tree were you, you silly bugger! Go on, the door to heaven’s on the left”.

Strangely (or should it be) for an atheist I find God’s judgement as presented by Haris very touching. If there is a God ;-), surely Haris’ version has to be the true one - One who is kind, just, loving, compassionate, humorous, and definitely One confidently above silly (human projected) petty nonsensical jealousy.

I am reminded of a quote by one of the Hindu Trinity, Krishna who said “Whoever you pray to, it is I who will answer”.

But the story of Jambuism also tells me a little about the author, and I now look at him differently.

Yes, I now like him ;-)

9 comments:

  1. the group (6 people) met up with him for the first time recently. I can say that he is down to earth but what strikes me most is his honesty and strong commitment for a sustained civil society.
    this guy is for real and I think the country needs more individuals like him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The issue of Hindraf actually divided the cyber based civil society. This mainly because of Uthayakumar's interview in Singapore's pop tabloid.But more than that, there are other reasons for the divide in opinion (Harris camp vs Nat camp).

    This bec of selective presentation of Rocky who first introduce the interview. Rocky excerpts were selective in projecting Uthaya as promoting violent. Latter, a number of bloggers reproduced the whole interview, it gives much different view than Rocky's initial projection.

    On the other hand, the paper itself is known for sensationalisation and dramatisation. It is well known for with that image in singapore.

    Third cause for the problem is the naivity of Uthaya himself in understanding how media can play up an issue. He did made a mistake. He said the right thing in the wrong way. His examples are all subject to manipulation. And that happened.

    Thanks to Rocky, he managed to do what he intend to.His dislikes to uthaya is not a secret for a careful reader.Thus divided the cyber world and people like Harris.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I respect Harris's writings, though I don't always agree with him.
    I think Harris's initial criticism of Hindraf (which I also shared misgivings) was that it advocating a purely race (in fact religious-based-Hinduism) approach to a valid social issue. And Hindraf's apparent militancy made many people, even people who sympathise with their complaints, uneasy.

    One of the lessons of life for me has been not to be too hasty to judge people's intentions. And also be willing to reevaluate people in light of subsequent behaviour and situations.

    People are not black-and-white cardboard cut-outs. I guess that is something most of us have to learn the hard way over many years, after we realise we can be sometimes very wrong about people (either way, good or bad).

    ReplyDelete
  4. i know who are the 2nd group....the ungrateful hindraf!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kaytee, your confession of your cessation of prejudice against outspoken Harris is a signal indication that there is hope for this nation. God is not finished with Malaysia yet, because men like KT can be converted!

    I just reasoned with my children - all bright and logical - this morning that an atheist is effectively declaring himself god, all knowing! Think about it!

    sing, penang

    ReplyDelete
  6. With his ongoing trench-war with the non-progressive muslim blog-front, I am sure Haris will be happy to get all the friends he can get :-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I find his article Jambuism funny too... ;)

    Kind of curious about the group that you are disappointed... :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kaytee ... good to read that you have revised your opinion of Haris.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Prince Principles1:13 pm, June 23, 2008

    High time you appreciated Haris Ibrahim.

    ReplyDelete