Albanese announces Palestinian recognition, saying war in Gaza has gone too far
Story by political reporter Jake Evans
Australia will join other nations to recognise Palestine, subject to conditions including that Hamas plays no role in its governance. (ABC News: Monte Bovill)
Australia will move to recognise a state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly next month, with a condition that terror group Hamas play no role in its future governance.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would work with the international community to make recognition a reality.
"Australia will recognise the state of Palestine. Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own, predicated on the commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority," Mr Albanese said.
"A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza."
The Palestinian Authority has promised Australia it would recognise Israel's right to exist, demilitarise and hold general elections, among other commitments.
Mr Albanese said every generation had known "failures and false storms" in the decades of failure to internationally recognise a state of Israel and of Palestine.
But he said the world could not wait for success to be guaranteed.
"The risk of trying is nothing compared to the danger of letting this moment pass us by. The toll of the status quo is growing by the day and it could be measured in innocent lives," Mr Albanese said.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said it had been more than 77 years since the world promised a Palestinian state.
"In the nearly two years since [the] October 7 [terror attack by Hamas], we have been working with the international community on breaking the cycle of violence," she said.
"We can't keep waiting for the end of a peace process that has ground to a halt."
The prime minister said he had spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a "long" and "civil" discussion.
"The arguments he put to me were very similar to the arguments he put more than a year ago. It seems to me very clearly … we need a political solution, not a military one," he said.
"I have said it publicly and I said it directly to Prime Minister Netanyahu: the situation in Gaza has gone beyond the world's worst fears.
"Far too many innocent lives have been lost. The Israeli government continues to defy international law and deny sufficient aid, food and water to desperate people, including children.
"This vital aid must be allowed to get to the people who need it most. This is about much more than drawing a line on a map."
Israel claims decision 'elevates Hamas'
Ahead of the decision, Mr Netanyahu told journalists that Australia and other nations were "delusional" for thinking Palestinian recognition would bring peace.
"To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that. Fall right into it … I think it's actually shameful, but it's not going to change our position," Mr Netanyahu said.
Israel's ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon said Mr Albanese's decision "would not change the reality on the ground".
"Peace is not achieved through declarations; it is achieved when those who have chosen terror abandon it and when violence and incitement end," Mr Maimon said in a statement.
"By recognising a Palestinian state now, Australia elevates the position of Hamas, a group i acknowledges as a terrorist organisation."
The Opposition has argued now is not the time to recognise Palestine, supporting Israel's view that it would be a reward to Hamas.
In a statement, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the government's unilateral decision put it out of step with Australia's "most important ally" and most consequential player in the Middle East, the United States.
"Until today it has been a bipartisan position that the question of recognising Palestinian statehood should come at the end of the peace negotiation process, not at the start or during it," Ms Ley said.
"Anthony Albanese has committed Australia to recognising Palestine while hostages remain in tunnels under Gaza and with Hamas still in control of the population of Gaza.
"Australians all want the war in Gaza to end. Ending this war is the only way to save lives and safeguard a two-state solution. The clear advice of our most important ally is this decision will not expedite that outcome."
Recognition 'practical contribution' to peace, says PM
Australia has long maintained a bipartisan position that the states of Israel and Palestine should be able to peacefully coexist under a "two-state solution" and within internationally recognised borders.
But as a number of Australia's allies, including the United Kingdom, France and Canada, say they are prepared to formally recognise Palestine next month, momentum has built for Australia to follow.
New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters confirmed this afternoon it too was carefully weighing its position on recognition and would decide in the next month.
The prime minister said last month, however, his government would only move to recognise Palestine if doing so would be a "meaningful" contribution to peace.
Senator Wong this afternoon said "September is that time".
Australia's recognition of Palestine would not immediately shift its legal standing.
But it would mark a historic moment for Australia to add its voice to international calls for recognition, and build pressure on Israel and the United States to find a pathway towards recognition.
"This is a practical contribution towards building momentum," Mr Albanese said.
"This is not Australia acting alone. What we are seeing is a range of countries engaging in detailed dialogue … behind the scenes, if you like, about what peace looks like in the region."
The Palestinian Authority's President Mahmoud Abbas told Anthony Albanese last week that Australia could play an "important" role as a diplomatic middle power by recognising Palestine.
Reacting to the announcement, Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said the prime minister's commitment was a "betrayal" of Israeli hostages still being held by Hamas.
"This announcement gives them no hope for release. It leaves Hamas armed and in control of territory, and in a position to regroup and rearm," Mr Aghion said in a statement.
"The government has departed from decades of bipartisan consensus which has envisaged Palestinian statehood and recognition as part of a comprehensive peace agreement between Israel, the Palestinians and the Arab States."
US maintains veto power over Palestinian recognition
The United Kingdom has said it will also formally recognise Palestine at the September UN meeting unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza and resumes humanitarian aid.
And Canada and France have said they intend to recognise Palestine at the UN, with conditions that Hamas play no role in its future governance.
France and the UK's recognition would leave the United States as the sole permanent member of the UN Security Council not to have recognised Palestine.
However, as a permanent member, the US has a veto power over Security Council resolutions, a power it has previously used to block Palestine's admission.
US President Donald Trump has said recognising Palestine in September would be "rewarding Hamas" after its October 7, 2023, attack, when hundreds of Israeli civilians were killed and more than 200 people taken hostage.
The US embassy confirmed Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke earlier today, and discussed "issues" in the Middle East.
Currently, 147 of the 193 UN member states recognise Palestine as a sovereign state.
Many hurdles to a two-state solution
Even if Palestinian statehood were to be endorsed at the General Assembly, a negotiated two-state solution has proven an insurmountable task for decades.
Recent major attempts in 2007 and 2013 to negotiate a solution, coordinated by the US, ended without an agreement.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has objected to Palestinian statehood, particularly since October 7, and Israel continues to occupy parts of the Palestinian territories, including settlements in the West Bank deemed illegal under international law.
This morning, he repeated that Israel had offered terms for a conditional statehood "many times" and it had been rejected.
"The prevailing assumption in this is that the problem that we have with the Palestinians is the absence of a Palestinian state, and if they were given a Palestinian state, they would stop the efforts to destroy the Jewish state," he said.
"The real reason that this conflict persists is not because of the absence of a Palestinian state, but the persistent Palestinian refusal to recognise a Jewish state in any boundary."
Just days ago, Mr Netanyahu also approved the takeover of Gaza City in a major escalation of the war.
On the Palestinian side, Hamas has refused to relinquish control of Gaza, and refuses to disarm until a Palestinian state is recognised.
While the Palestinian Authority signed a declaration last year that would allow Hamas to be included in a temporary "national unity" government after the war, Mr Albanese said today it had given commitments that Hamas would have no role to play, that the PA would disarm as part of a peace deal, and would restart elections in the territory.
Many of the Arab League nations also do not recognise Israel.
But in a momentous shift in Middle Eastern politics, those nations last month backed a declaration that called on Hamas to disarm and end its rule in Gaza so that a solution that recognises both Israel and Palestine could be negotiated.
Mr Albanese said the history of failures in implementing a two-state solution "casts a long shadow".
But he said the world could not let this moment pass by.
"There is a moment of truth here and Australia will work with the international community to seize it."
Even if Palestinian statehood were to be endorsed at the General Assembly, a negotiated two-state solution has proven an insurmountable task for decades.
Recent major attempts in 2007 and 2013 to negotiate a solution, coordinated by the US, ended without an agreement.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has objected to Palestinian statehood, particularly since October 7, and Israel continues to occupy parts of the Palestinian territories, including settlements in the West Bank deemed illegal under international law.
This morning, he repeated that Israel had offered terms for a conditional statehood "many times" and it had been rejected.
"The prevailing assumption in this is that the problem that we have with the Palestinians is the absence of a Palestinian state, and if they were given a Palestinian state, they would stop the efforts to destroy the Jewish state," he said.
"The real reason that this conflict persists is not because of the absence of a Palestinian state, but the persistent Palestinian refusal to recognise a Jewish state in any boundary."
Just days ago, Mr Netanyahu also approved the takeover of Gaza City in a major escalation of the war.
On the Palestinian side, Hamas has refused to relinquish control of Gaza, and refuses to disarm until a Palestinian state is recognised.
While the Palestinian Authority signed a declaration last year that would allow Hamas to be included in a temporary "national unity" government after the war, Mr Albanese said today it had given commitments that Hamas would have no role to play, that the PA would disarm as part of a peace deal, and would restart elections in the territory.
Many of the Arab League nations also do not recognise Israel.
But in a momentous shift in Middle Eastern politics, those nations last month backed a declaration that called on Hamas to disarm and end its rule in Gaza so that a solution that recognises both Israel and Palestine could be negotiated.
Mr Albanese said the history of failures in implementing a two-state solution "casts a long shadow".
But he said the world could not let this moment pass by.
"There is a moment of truth here and Australia will work with the international community to seize it."
***
Let us all remind ourselves that Hamas was created and nurtured by the Israeli State, in their nefarious intent to sabotage Fatah. Wakakaka, you nurse what was a viper in your breast so suck on its venom, Shailoks - in short, reap what you sow.
7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.
9 And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.
- Galatians 6:7–9 (KJV)
Albanese badly needs Australia's fast growing Muslim and Arab voters support for Labour.
ReplyDeleteMfer, is that the best excuse u could master out from yr twisted neurons?
DeleteAlbo says Oz will recognize the PA gomen in which Harm-ass has no part. This is wishful thinking not based on realities. It's kindergarten politics, not even a 19-year old chanting things he does not even begin to understand. He is sucking a pacifier and reading Batman comics.
ReplyDelete1. Albo says he has "received commitments" from PA, meaning from President Mahmoud Abbas, On 16 September 2008, in Jerusalem, Isaac PM Ehud Olmert offered Mahmoud Abbas 94% of the West Bank, and a tunnel or highway connecting it to the Gaza Strip. Olmert said "In the next 50 years you will not find one Isaac leader that will propose to you what I propose to you now". Two-state solution lah. Mahmoud Abbas rejected it. Fast forward to today: will Abbas now give up the "From The River to The Sea" and accept an Isaac state as neighbour?
Nah, read:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g0dv7rxxvo
2. Mahmoud Abbas is into his 20th year of a 4-year term. Does he have the legitimacy (similar argument to Zelensky-Ukraine)
3. Harm-ass kicked out PA's Fatah from Gaza in 2007. After Oct 7, 2023 IDF has fought back and Harm-ass' last stand is Gaza City. So who will remove Harm-ass from Gaza City? Will Harm-ass lay down their arms and surrender? If not....will Fatah send in soldiers to get rid of Harm-ass? Will Albo send Oz military? France? UK? Canada? Bolehland? The 155 countries that recognize Palestine? It will be messy if Harm-ass won't go quietly.
Oh Wait !! I have an idea: How about we ask IDF to finish the job? They are at the doorstep to Gaza City now, ready to go.
4. Albo says there must be an elections in Palestine. So Naive. There hasn't been one for 20 years. The last one ended in a civil war between Harm-ass and Fatah. No Isaac involved by the way. Today all polls show that Harm-ass is the most popular party. Fatah will likely lose. If Harm-ass is banned from contesting in elections their leaders can just form another party called "Friday the 13th Jihad Party", financed and armed by Iran, beat Fatah in elections then they will be back in power and want to continue waging civil war with Fatah and with Isaac. The Circle of Death Will Continue (not Life). The next Oct 7 just around the corner.
5. What are the borders of this new country? Have all the neighbouring countries agreed to it? Note: Albo sidesteps the precondition that all the neighbours accept that the country of Isaac has the right to exist.
6. What will be the capital of this new country? Note: I said "new" because Palestine has never existed. Did Albo say Who gets Jerusalem?
7. How Will the issue of the "Right of Return" be addressed? Will the 7 million or so "Arabs", the anak cucu cicik of the original 600k from 1948 stay where they are or will Isaac agree to absorb them all? If they are allowed back (now THAT would be Nakba) who will house, clothe, feed, educate and give them jobs? UNRWA? Oz, UK, France, Canada etc?
Will the 7 million then be called Isaacs, since they will be Isaac citizens and live in Isaac? Or does Isaac have to change the name, flag and national anthem to Ishmael, Bulan Sabit and Sword? Since Isaac constitution is a secular one, will the 7 million accept it and not insist on Sharia law? Or does the Isaac constitution have to be changed?
8. Did Albo state releasing the remaining hostages as a pre-condition for recognition. Or are they All forgotten? Isaac lives don't matter?
9. How will Albo explain recognizing a gomen that allows men to beat their wives? This is from official Palestinian TV:
https://youtu.be/NJYhwtn5wcI?feature=shared
https://youtu.be/DuGi2rA2SYA?feature=shared
I don't need to tell you what they do to LGBT. Will there be protes on the streets on Sydney and Melbourne?
Albo's decision has nothing to do with Gaza City, Bethlehem or Ramalah but everything to do with Paramatta, Bondi, Northcote and Broadmeadows. The same goes for France, UK and Canada.
repeat of an early comment.
Delete1) only a real fool would buy into the fart of zionist state PM Ehud Olmert offered to Mahmoud.
2) Mahmoud Abbas is into his 20th year of a 4-year term of a state that IS not recognized under UN Charter, mfer!
3) those meeting zionist soldierboys r ALREADY inside & ALLOVER Gaza strip. No need to ask. Just get them to keep watching their backs.
4) who the f*ck is the zionist state to get involved with the internal dissidences between Hamas & Fatah?
Ooop… to create The Circle of Death to ensure the sustainability of the zionist state!
5) borders of the new country?
Mfer, if u have believed in the 2state solution, then the zionist state would have to give back all those additional lands it has rampassed since the mfering pommie Belfour 'bestowed' upon it.
6) capital of this new country?
Mfer, the people of the new country will decide. It isn't ur fart to postulate otherwise.
7) similarly, the Right of Return" isn't yr fart to spill. The people will decide.
The zionist state has NO say!
8) when the zionist state is no more on the land of Levant, there will not be anymore hostages of any kind, mfer!
9) why must a outsider keapoci about the internal affairs of another nation?
Too free?
Then, mfer, raise the issue of those internal jewish caste within the zionist state lah.
mfer, do keep in mind that politikus r the same allover the world. Zionist state included!
Shalom,
ReplyDeleteJust finished reading Constantine K Zurayk's book: "The Meaning of the Disaster". Translated from Arabic. It's free online, courtesy of University of Massachusetts at Amherst. In my view it should be compulsory
reading for all pro-Palestinian protesters in Harvard and Columbia as punishment....ha3
Zurayk was a Arab-Syrian Nationalist Intellectual, the book was written in 1948, so his viewpoint provides a look into the Arab mindset as the the Arab-Isaac war was unfolding. He is best known for coining the term Nakba (Disaster). He grew up as an Orthodox Christian (surprise2).
Here are some key take-aways:
1. He doesn't even once refer to Arabs in the region as "Palestinians". They were all simply Arabs, like those who lived in today's Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia or Egypt
2. His views on Isaacs and Zionists are blatantly antisemetic (no surprise, majority of Arabs were the same, but not all)
3. He notes 30 years of revolts against Zionists prior to the war, countering what he perceives as the impotence of Arabs in the war
4. He speaks of Arabs fleeing and abandoning their homes at the first sight of battle (eg Haifa)
5. He laments the Arab disorganization in planning and executing the war as an utter failure compared to the Zionist preparedness. He offers intellectual and practical remedies to the problem
6. He speaks of Arab excess and luxury instead of war-readiness. What he describes as having snobbish arrogance instead of one ready to die for the cause
7. He focuses on the Arab nations’ many shortcomings, not the individual suffering of ordinary Arab civilians
8. His overarching message is clear: The catastrophe, or Nakba, wasn’t a story of passive victimization, it commemorated the complete failure of the Arab armies to defeat the Zionists.
Or as Zurayk puts it:
"Seven Arab states declare war on Zionism, stop impotent before it, and then turn on their heels. The representatives of the Arabs deliver fiery speeches in the highest international forums, warning what the Arab state and peoples will do if this or that decision be enacted.
Declarations fall like bombs from the mouths of officials at the meetings of the Arab League, but when action becomes necessary, the fire is still and quiet and steel and iron are rusted and twisted, quick to bend and disintegrate".
Excerpts from his other works:
"The reason for the victory of the Zionists was that the roots of Zionism are grounded in modern Western life, while we for the most part are still distant from this life and hostile to it. They live in the present and for the future, while we continue to dream the dreams of the past and to stupefy ourselves with its fading glory"
https://archive.org/details/zurayk-nakba
wakakaFar u read books?
DeletePerhaps, books recommended by zionist sources to ace their zion cause.
Mmmm… there is a current equivalent of this Constantine K Zurayk. Check Fareed Zakaria of CNN.
Harm-ass Cell Leader posing as a Al Jezebel "Journalist" was taken out by IDF.
ReplyDeleteHere is another example of fake reporting, this time by a photographer whose picture was viraled worldwide, now the picture is exposed as being staged. Journalists and photographers are supposed to be independent and fair in their reporting, in order to give balanced picture to all sides.
https://www.thejc.com/news/israel/picture-agencies-drop-gaza-photographer-hunger-images-staged-sl1eyl2e
Picture Agencies drop Gaza photographer after documentary reveals hunger images were staged...
Anas Zayed Fteiha, who works for the Turkish state-owned agency Anadolu, was filmed taking photos of Gazan children with empty bowls outstretched, despite not being at a food bank.
A number of European picture agencies have told German media that they will no longer use images from a Gazan photographer after an investigation by Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) found that some of his depictions of hunger in the Strip were staged.
In a documentary about his work during the war, Anas Zayed Fteiha was filmed taking pictures of civilians queuing for aid.
From the perspective of his lens, the photo showed a crowd of Gazans with empty bowls outstretched, appearing to be jostling for food.
However, a wide shot from the film published by SZ revealed that there were no supplies behind Fteiha as he took the photo and that he was not at a food bank at the time.
Questions have also been raised about the photographer’s independence, given that he works for Turkey’s state-run agency Anadolu and has previously posted anti-Israel statements on social media.
These included an illustration of him in a press vest and helmet surrounded by the domes of Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount and underscored by the caption “Free Palestine”, as well as a video clip bearing the caption “f*** Israel”.
The images he took were distributed by Anadolu and were used by outlets including New York Magazine, CNN and BBC News, according to German paper Bild.
Yr mfering description of those hungry Gazan children stretching their empty bowls for him to take photos is a cruel fart of no brainer!
DeleteSo what is unspoken in SZ revealed that there were no supplies behind Fteiha as he took the photo and that he was not at a food bank at the time?
Must those hungry children ONLY begging for foods in a queue winding around the food bank?
Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) ISN'T neutral in this reporting. Likening to ALL current generation of the German, they r all forced to repay the blood credit of the holocaust to those Europe rejected zionists running atrocities in the land of Levant.
Mfer, u know not of starvation to fart this!
How many of u, mfers, remember the hunting photo of a hooded vulture eyeing quietly aside for a starving child to take his last breath? This photo taken by Kevin Carter in Sudan (now South Sudan), in March 1993, troubled him so much that he eventually killed himself.
Carter took a sensational photo to upstage his career while Anas Zayed Fteiha took that photo to show the world about starving children in Gaza.
Mfer, show so decency if u still have some left!
"We in Gaza want Hamas to surrender and lay down its pointless arms"
ReplyDeleteProof that Harm-ass imposes GST (Gaza Starvation Tax) which many bloggers here love...ha3
The following video contains a statement from Moumen Al-Natour, who is a Gazan and anti-Hamas advocate. He describes his experience in Gaza as never receiving any aid for free, instead always having to buy it from the black market. He advocates having the civilian population moved into a restricted humanitarian zone where all identities are verified and Hamas members are prevented from entry. He says that this is the only way to lower the civilian casualties while continuing to fight Hamas, as they will never willingly surrender. He also calls for a change in the mechanism of aid due to the current process supporting Hamas through market taxation and extortion.
https://x.com/peacecomcenter/status/1953449971753123861?s=46&t=XwmR7hYz2HQwX_ulHIC87g
another c&p fart to whitewash yr zionist idols!
DeleteThis X user spent a lot of time analysing social media and reveals interesting data on what should be "combatant deaths" but reported by Harm-ass (aka Gaza Health Ministry) as "civilian child deaths". Note all are below 18 years of age and their pictures tell a different story, they all carry guns.
ReplyDeleteSo please don't be Gullible Guppies and swallow all the sampah Harm-ass spews out. The 61,000 deaths they report so far, only Allah knows how many of them were really civilians.
https://x.com/MiddleEastBuka/status/1943200137452675138
Gullible Guppies, only as u can use the term!
DeleteMfer, not everyone is as keen as u to source zionist farts & doing c&p postings.
For every pro zionist articles/videos u posted, there r equally many pro Palestinian articles/videos circulatong in the WWW.
Only a bored & mfering zionist arselicker would do what u r doing.
Ooop… honorary zionist!
Mfer, those zionists claim to be their god's chosen people. So is yr honorary approved by the zionist god?
Emboldened by Albo.....in Melbourne...."We Are Awaiting Orders", yes indeed, you Reap What You Sow....
ReplyDeletehttps://x.com/RadioEuropes/status/1954987632653709468
u, too!
DeleteThe Al Jezebel "Journalist" Anas Al-Sharif.....pictured with Harm-ass Leader
ReplyDeletehttps://x.com/Osint613/status/1954869419932262713
so?
DeleteJournalist cant have picture taken with anybody!
Especially in ME, any slight association with any Palestine movement is a foe to the cause of zion.
What a f*ck!