Room for the third vote: What is the Federal Capital Act 1960, and why is PAS attacking DAP over calls to amend it?
Wednesday, 23 Oct 2024 7:00 AM MYT
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 23 — Political tensions are flaring again as PAS has openly criticised DAP over the latter’s alleged intentions to amend the Federal Capital Act 1960.
But what is this Act, and why has it become a hot debate? Malay Mail breaks it down for you.
So, what is the Federal Capital Act 1960?
The Federal Capital Act 1960 is the law that formalised Kuala Lumpur as Malaysia’s capital and laid out its development and management by the federal government, unlike other towns and cities in the country, which are administered by local councils.
Since Kuala Lumpur became a Federal Territory (FT) in 1974, its administration has been handled by the FT Ministry and the Mayor with input from an appointed Advisory Board.
Unlike other cities, Kuala Lumpur lacks elected or appointed city councillors, leaving its governance highly centralised under federal jurisdiction.
What amendments is DAP pushing for?
DAP leaders, notably secretary-general Anthony Loke and vice-chairman Teresa Kok, have long called for reforms to the law regarding the appointment of city councillors for Kuala Lumpur.
This proposal is part of a broader effort to align Kuala Lumpur’s governance with other Malaysian cities, which operate under local councils with either appointed or elected representatives.
According to DAP, the ultimate goal is to reintroduce local government elections.
On October 13, the FT DAP during its convention urged the federal government to implement governance reforms within DBKL by introducing a system for appointing councillors, which is already required in all 14 states.
According to its chairman Tan Kok Wai, the move would be a preliminary step towards more comprehensive reforms, with the ultimate goal of reinstating local council elections, which are also called the third vote.
Loke recently described the proposal by the Federal Territory DAP to appoint council members to the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) as a progressive step towards ensuring good governance.
But he also said the proposal would be taken up with the central Pakatan Harapan (PH) leadership council before any formal actions are taken.
That was also when Kok emphasised the importance of amending the Federal Capital Act to permit the appointment of councillors, similar to other local authorities governed by the Local Government Act 1976.
This, according to DAP, would enhance transparency, accountability, and representation for Kuala Lumpur residents, ensuring their interests are better reflected in the city’s administration.
So why is it controversial with PAS?
Federal Opposition party PAS has taken the stance that amending the Federal Capital Act to be in line with the Local Government Act will potentially shift the power structure from the federal government to a more locally controlled administration.
Basically, the Islamist thinks this could tip the political balance in favour of urban-focused parties like DAP, especially given their support base in metropolitan areas such as Kuala Lumpur.
KENYATAAN MEDIA PAS WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN
Mengapa DAP Mahu Pinda Akta Ibu Kota Persekutuan 1960?
PAS Wilayah Persekutuan dengan tegas membantah sebarang usaha oleh DAP untuk meminda Akta Ibu Kota Persekutuan 1960, khususnya berkenaan cadangan pembentukan jawatan Ahli Majlis Berkuasa Tempatan (PBT) di Wilayah Persekutuan.
...See moreThe Youth wing of FT PAS had even accused DAP’s Nga Kor Ming of accomplishing this in his capacity as housing and local government minister and the proposed Urban Renewal Act.
At the core of it, however, if the fear that the ethnic Chinese would dominate urban areas. This point had previously been highlighted when Nga was appointed to the portfolio back in 2022.
MATLAMAT DAP MENGUASAI TANAH & PBT
1- Parti DAP sekali lagi mengumumkan hasrat dan cita-cita mereka untuk mewujudkan pilihanraya Pihak Berkuasa Tempatan (PBT) di Wilayah Persekutuan melalui cadangan meminda Akta Ibu Kota Persekutuan 1960 didalam Konvensyen Biasa Negeri DAP Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur 2024 pada 13 Oktober lalu.
2- Hasrat DAP ini bukanlah suatu perkara baru dan sememangnya perkara ini telah acap kali diulang oleh para pemimpin mereka di banyak peringkat. D...
See moreData from civil group Tindak Malaysia provided to Malay Mail in 2022 showed that Kuala Lumpur is still dominated by Bumiputeras, and ethnic Chinese voters continue to fall in proportion despite still being the majority.
PH, which holds 10 of Kuala Lumpur’s 13 parliamentary seats, evenly divided between DAP and PKR, initially promised to reinstate local council elections when it came to power in 2018.
However, the coalition eventually dropped this commitment, citing insufficient support. To reintroduce local council elections, the coalition would have needed a two-thirds majority in Parliament.
Recommended read:
Grilled over third vote in London, Hadi brings up May 13
Tuesday, 25 Dec 2018 5:18 PM MYT
PETALING JAYA, Dec 25 — A dialogue session with PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang in London yesterday turned into a heated verbal exchange between participants after he invoked the spectre of the bloody May 13 racial riots in warning against local elections.
According to a report by Malaysiakini, Abdul Hadi was earlier responding to a question by a participant on why the former was against the implementation of local council elections.
“When an election is contested only by residents [and does not include those who serve the residents], it is certain that big cities such as Kuala Lumpur, Ipoh, Penang, Seremban, and Johor Baru would be dominated by DAP Chinese.
“They can make alcohol and gambling permissible,” he reportedly said in the event held by PAS supporters’ club in the United Kingdom, but the report did not state his proof for the assertion.
He argued that local elections must be inclusive so that cities are not dominated by just one race.
“So an election must involve the taxi drivers, traders, and all those who make a city alive.
“If only one race is in power then a situation like in May 13, 1969 may arise again, we don’t want that,” he said in the report.
However the mention of May 13 caused the participant who claimed to have raised funds for PAS in 2013, to verbally abuse Abdul Hadi by chiding the Islamist politician of being “stuck in 1969.”
When asked to calm down, the man responded with a barrage of expletives by telling the other individual to mind their own business.
The verbal exchange did not stop there as the man then subsequently challenged the other audience member to meet him “outside,” before calling Abdul Hadi a racist.
***
No comments:
Post a Comment