Background
1987 - UMNO split into two opposing groups, commonly referred to as Team A led by Mahathir, and Team B led by Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah and Musa Hitam [from Wiki]
2019 - Pakatan and PKR split due to PM-transition issue between Mahathir and Anwar Ibrahim
Burning Issue
Basically, they were school administrators unqualified for Chinese schools.
 |
IGP launched Ops Lalang to arrest DJZ leaders and supporters |
2019 - Education Minister's decision to implement Khat-Jawi lessons in vernacular schools which causes suspicions and fears amongst Chinese educationists and students' parents.
Basically, the topic is not appropriate for building a strong base in science, maths, economics, technology for Chinese schools.
Basically, the topic is not appropriate for building a strong base in science, maths, economics, technology for Chinese schools.
 |
IGP cancelled DJZ Congress through court order |
Parties Involved
1987
a. Education Minister
b. DJZ
c. Malay ultra groups threatened violence
d. Police
e. PM Mahathir
2019
a. Education Minister
b. DJZ
c. Malay ultra groups threatened violence
d. Police
e. PM Mahathir
Preventing Action
1987 - Ops Lalang where police arrested mainly opposition leaders, NGO leaders, press leaders
Common Denominator 1987 & 2019?
PM Mahathir who faced/faces problems vis-a-vis his power, position & political continuity in both 1987 and 2019.
These stupid dunggus do not know nuts from marbles,yet they want to teach their mothers and grandmothers how to suck balls.Mahathir,Anwar or Mazlee as education minister,the only good they can teach is to go suck Donald Trump's mini balls.Even Melania said that they are minis.
ReplyDeletewakakaka
DeleteThe main difference between 1987 and today.
ReplyDelete1987 Mahathir had an indefinite expectancy to hold on to power, and he had every intention to stay on in power another 20 or 30 years.
1987, UMNO was all powerful, even though it had internal fissures.
2019 - in 20 years, Mahathir will be just dust.
Pribumi is the weakest party, which has just been trounced in the latest by-elections.
ERRATUM:
ReplyDeleteQUOTE
2019 - Education Minister's decision to implement Khat-Jawi lessons in vernacular schools which causes suspicions and fears amongst Chinese educationists and students' parents.
UNQUOTE
CORRECTED STATEMENT (from MOE FAQ https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/486919)
QUOTE
When was this decision to include khat calligraphy made?
The introduction of khat calligraphy was decided during the revision of the curriculum (KSSR) in 2014.
UNQUOTE
Jibby was PM in 2014, not Toonsie. So the parallel universe theory falls apart.
But you got one FACT right: It was the Education Minister in 2019 who decided to implemented the decision, not the Deputy Minister, so Teoh Nie Ching is not to blame, so lay off her ha ha ha....
Syabas to the SEKAT conference organisers today, they totally defused, disarmed and neutralised the Malay NGO groups who were making all kinds of threats and overtures. SEKAT basically called their bluff and invited them into the conference where it was squeaky bum and red face time for the protesters.
ReplyDeleteWell done.
Wonder no more why our university graduates cannot find jobs. Here is what we teach them:
ReplyDeleteQUOTE
Varsity exam question calls Zakir Naik ‘an icon’
FMT Reporters -December 29, 2019
PETALING JAYA: An uproar has broken out on social media over a university examination question which appears to praise controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik by calling him an “icon in the Islamic world”.
The question appears in an examination paper on Ethnic Relations.
A screenshot of the question was posted on Facebook by MIC vice-chief Sivarrajh Chandran.
The question reads: “Zakir Naik is one of the icons of the Islamic world. He is very active in spreading true Islam and following the Quran and Sunnah of Rasulullah SAW. He is able to reason and to answer every question that is asked to him. However, in Malaysia, he is no longer allowed to deliver his preaching. In your opinion, as a Malaysian, why does this happen?”
Students are given a multiple-choice answer with these reasons:
1) Malaysians do not bother to receive information
2) Malaysians were sensitive and feel threatened for no reason
3) Malaysians just follow the crowd without verifying any information
4) Malaysians are ignorant about their own religion.
Sivarrajh had questioned why such a question, deemed to be insensitive to people of different races, had been included in an examination for a module that was meant to foster racial and religious understanding.
UNQUOTE
I-con rhyme with I con....and sounds exactly the same. LOL
DeleteBut why did Pakatan government have to implement a bad policy (as yet unimplemented by BN even though policy was in 2014) in 2019? Shows the evil intent of Pakatan government
ReplyDeletethere is more dog around i suppose, 42 at least.
DeleteNo!
DeleteDogs r not the issue.
The issue at hand IS the K9 caretaker!
Dogs, by nature can ONLY be easily enticed by the right inducements. The K9 caretaker, like u, is the go between amongst the K9 & the string pulling puppeteera.
Well said and next election tsunami should neutralize both PH&BN from coming into power.....all political parties should been shown that Rakyat is the power....Maju's direction is correct with small correction....let the locals endorse the independent candidates by their own merit...3rd party should not interfere...
ReplyDeleteHidup Mahathir... Hidup Mahathir... Teruskan perjuangan... Perjuangan belum selesai... Hidup Melayu... Hidup Melayu.... Melayu Mudah Lupa.
ReplyDelete